User talk:EdgarCabreraFariña

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 15:30, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Hello, I'm Amortias. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Seth Rollins without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Amortias (T)(C) 19:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015

Do not add speculative storylining to SummerSlam (2012) without sources to back this material up thank you. 121.214.28.199 (talk) 00:54, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! - 220 of ^Borg 04:31, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited "Mary Shelley (Doctor Who)", you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Storm Warning. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Seth Rollins and championship listing

Hello, I'm so sorry for replying only now, but I had some problems. Anyway, I don't remember much now, but yes, I did thank you for your edit, which I thought was helpful. I'm also so happy to hear that, I didn't know that just a "thank you" could do that, but I'm so glad to hear that, really. Talking about the Seth Rollins page, I actually don't know if I should talk about it here, but I wanted to talk about an edit I think would be helpful, in my opinion. I think that the championships won in the "Championships and accomplishments" section should be listed alphabetically and I thought that was already the criterion used since many other wrestler pages had the championship listed alphabetically, or at least I thought. Because I actually found out that the titles won in each promotion should be listed in order of importance. Honestly, though, I think it would be better to do it alphabetically, for two reasons:

Sure, there're titles who are obviously more important than others (for example, the world title, the WWE World Heavyweight Championship will always be more important than the secondary title, the Interoontinental Championship, no matter what), but there're also many other titles that it's not easy at all to be listed as more important than others (for example, how can you say which is the more important and promient title between either two world titles, secondary titles, or world tag team titles when they're portrayed as equivalents?). How can you objectively say that, for example, the United States Championship is more important than the Intercontinental Championship? Sure, now, thanks to John Cena, the United States Championship has grow up so much as value, but how it will be in one or two years? Maybe in two years the Intercontinental Championship will look to be more important, then in five years the United States Championship will look the be more important again, et cetera. Also, in Rollins' page they're listed in order of importance by the following: the WWE World Heavyweight Championship, the United States Championship, and then the WWE Tag Team Championship, respectly. But why should the WWE Tag Team Championship be considered less important than the United States Championship? Sure, the United States Championship may be in fact more important for being a single, old, and historic title, but after all it's "just" a secondary title, while the WWE Tag Team Championship is a world championship category (tag team e.d.) title. As you can see, there're so different opinions and it's really hard to say which title is really more important than others, which is why I think it would fit better to list them alphabetically.
The moves (finishing and trademark moves) are already listed alphabetically, so why not do the same for the championships won and the accomplishments conquered too? I would actually list alphabetically also ring names, the already listed alphabetically finishing and trademarks moves, plus managers, nicknames, and the said "Championships and accomplishments" section, while I would let only the entrance themes to be listed chronologically since there will must be listed the dates in which the themes were used by the wrestler.

So, what do you think about it? Do you agree with me or fo you think about it differently? Thanks for reading and let me know your thoughts. Thanks in advance for your reply.--Davide King (talk) 22:42, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry again for replying you only now, but I thank you so much for your reply, and also for your kindness. I'm so glad to hear that, and yeah, I just think that listing it alphabetically suits better an encyclopedia like Wikipedia, since by listening it in order of importance may not always be objective and there may be way more differents opinion. I understand, and I tried to list it alphabetically, but my edits got reverted.

Anyway, always about championship listing and such things, how would you list a championship that was won by the same wrestler with two differet names? Yeah, I'm mainly refering to all the wrestler who won the WWE's world title with both WWE Championship and WWE World Heavyweight Championship's names. For championships like the TNA Legends/Global/Television/King of the Mountain Championship I'm actually agree to use the "/", since they're totally different names, but for championships like the WWE and the ECW world titles (WWF World Heavyweight Championship became simply the WWF Championship, while then the WWE Championship became the WWE World Heavyweight Championship; meanwhile, the ECW World Heavyweight Championship, in the WWE's ECW (2006), first became the ECW World Championship and then simply the ECW Championship), where basically it only changes either the words "World" or "Heavyweight", or in some case both, it isn't bad to use the "()" instead of the "/"; so, instead to write the long "WWE Championship/WWE World Heavyweight Championship" or the "ECW World Heavyweight Championship/ECW Championship/ECW Championship", we could simply write "WWE (World Heavyweight) Championship" or "ECW World (Heavyweight) Championship". I saw first the "WWE (World Heavyweight) Championship" and I thought that it was actually ingenious, but now I see it isn't used as much as before, so I ask you: what do you think it's better? The pro of using the "()" is that it makes it way more shorter, but the con is that it may not be understandable at first; conversely, the pro of using the "/" is that it's always understandable, but sometimes it may get very long.

Said this, I also wanted to ask about certain championship's name; I'm talking in particular about the WWE World Heavyweight Championship and the Intercontinental Championship. What I wonder is when exactly then WWF World Heavyweight Championship became known simply as the WWF Championship, and on the other hand when then (WWF) Intercotinental Heavyweight Championship became simply known as (WWF) Intercontinental Championship, because there're different sources; Wikipedia, without any sources though, states that the WWF World Heavyweight Championship was known as such from December 26, 1983 to March 30, 1998 (ie Hogan's first reign and Stone Cold Steve Austin's first reign), but I also saw that other sources say that it became known as WWF Championship under the "Winged Eagle" championship belt or when Hogan's first reign came to an end and the vacant title was won by Randy Savage; while other sources state it became known as WWF Championship only on December 12, 2001, ie basically when Chris Jericho unifyed the WWF world title with the (WCW) world title and became the Undisputed WWF Champion. It should be noted that the "Winged Eagle" championship belt still had the word "Heavyweight", which was removed in the following championship belt, ie the "Big Eagle/Attitude Era" championship belt, which means it may be really true that the title became known simply as the WWF Championship only after WrestleMania XIV.

According to Wikipedia, the Intercontinental Championship became known simply as the (WWF) Intercontinental Championship on April 5, 1992, ie when Bret Hart defeated Roddy Piper at WrestleMania VIII. However, other sources state that the title became known simply as the Intercontinental Championship only in 1998, basically when The Rock was then Intercontinental Championship and had a new championship belt, which it should be noticed it didn't have the "Heavyweight" word aymore, so, like the WWF "Big Eagle" Championship belt, it may be true. There're also some sorces that don't consider the name (WWF) Intercontinental Heavyweight Championship and basically said that it was known as Intercontinental Championship since 1979. Always on Wikipedia, on the wrestlers' page who won the Intercontinental Championship when it was supposed to be still known as the Intercontinental Heavyweight Championship it is written simply as the Intercontinental Championship; even on Pat Patterson's page it is written only as the Intercontinental Championship; it may be just a mistake, but if the title was initially really known as the Intercontinental Heavyweight Championship, then the wrestlers' page who won the title during that period should be listed as such.

What do you think about it? I wonder all this because I'm curious about it and I actually do care even about little details, which is why if I see written WCW United States Championship I correct it in WCW United States Heavyweight Championsip, because that was actually the official title name (it became known simply as the WCW United Championship when the WWF purchased the WCW in 2001, and then in 2003 was simply known as the (WWE) United States Championship). I actually also do wonder about the old World Tag Team Championship; when the WWWF became simply the WWF, was the title known as the WWF Tag Team Championship or as the WWF World Tag Team Championship?

I apologize for the long message, but I hope that you can read it all when you can and write me your thoughts when it's possibile to you. Thank you so much again.--Davide King (talk) 20:05, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No need to say sorry and thanks to you, again! It's really nice talking to you. Wow, that's amazing, to hear that you thought the same, and I'm so happy that you got curious too. I'm not sure neither about the first point, I think both are correct, so it's just about whether you prefer to use the "/" or the "()". I knew it was announced as the "World Wrestling Federation Champion", but I thought that didn't excluded that the full name was still WWF World Heavyweight Championship, though you're probably right. I also did the same thing and I searched some videos too! So, in short, I think that you're right and that's probably the date more accurate and correct. Thank you so much for your reply.--Davide King (talk) 11:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sheamus

Could you revert your recent edit? You are correct that 4th comes from WHW, it is clear that Cole/Sheamus/WWE all consider unanimously that a former World Heavyweight reign counts as a former WWE World Heavyweight reign too, just as a former WWE reign does. WWE does the same thing for Cena/Orton calling them 15/12 time WWE World Heavyweight Champions.

Even the Rock's "World Championship" reigns with the WCW title (albeit while owned by WWE) are counted, which is why Rock is called a 10-time WWE World Heavyweight Championship.

Your edit removed references from the page, you erased evidence, why would you do that? If you are right then you should explain the evidence in some other way. You should supply a more reliable source for there being only 3 reigns for Sheamus and then mention he is referring to as being 4-time WWE World Heavyweight Champion, and who calls him only a 3-time one. So far 3-time is WP:OR because no source is listed next to it. 174.92.132.81 (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Shield page vandalized again.

Same IP user has vandalized The Shield (professional wrestling) yet again.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 22:27, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not vandalism, Roman Reigns and Dean Ambrose are The Shield, they're just not using The Shield name. The topic about this will be discussed in The Shield talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk) 01:43, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

re

Thanks for the notice about New wade on Bound for Glory (2016). I'm not sure what to do here. Whether we put an extended-confirmed protection on the page (New wade is not extendedconfirmed), bring this up to WP:INCIDENT, or get advice from the WikiProject Professional wrestling community, something should be done. I've placed an edit war tag on his talk page, and we'll see what comes from that. Thanks for the notice! JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

LaMia crash

G'day from Oz; the other day you thanked me for an edit to LaMia Flight 2933 in which I translated some comments into English. I now need some help; I have been using machine translation to add translations of the Spanish- and Portuguese-language sources in the article and I am at the stage where there are just two sources left in the article without translated titles. However I think the machine translation for these two is not useable and am hoping you can provide something better. The two are: "UEFA Champions League - Barcelona-Mönchengladbach - Mero trámite entre el Barcelona y el Gladbach" and "La aerolínea tuvo que acudir hasta a féretros prestados". Thanks in advance and cheers YSSYguy (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As well as the above, what is a pre-match pitazo? Cheers again YSSYguy (talk) 01:16, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of deletion notice

[1]

Not sure why you removed the deletion notice, but the deletion discussion is still ongoing.

Please leave it up there, until it is removed and closed by an administrator.

Thank you ! Sagecandor (talk) 16:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Yulín Cruz

I like YOUR text about 'unity of command' (which was totally replaced). Could some 'synthesis' be developed which might be an improvement over both versions of the text? MaynardClark (talk) 06:45, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rita Calderoni

Hello, thanks for writing this article! I'm concerned that this article has no inline citations, meaning it's hard to understand where the information came from and to verify it. Any chance you could specify which source you used where? Thanks. Blythwood (talk) 18:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

77

Hello again,

If I may write here, I apologize for the misunderstanding with info about the pavement. My question and misunderstanding was probably not well formulated — as I am not a native speaker — and I did not imagine this would be considered as insulting. Anyway, I just read WP:SOAPBOX as suggested.

Regards. 77 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.193.104.227 (talk) 22:02, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Fake News Awards

An article that you have been involved in editing—Fake News Awards—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. DARTHBOTTO_talk•cont 23:14, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 05:42, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Weinstein effect, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Narsil (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Sexism in American political elections

I declined your request to speedily delete Talk:Sexism in American political elections because I didn't understand what the problem was. If you want the underlying article Sexism in American political elections to be deleted, you may need to take it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion instead. If you need further advice, you can ask at my talk page (User talk:Metropolitan90). --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:14, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sexual abuse in Hollywood

Hi Edgar! I see you've done some great work on the "Sexual abuse in Hollywood" page and I thought I would direct you to an old version of the "Casting couch" page which had some interesting links relating to the background of this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Casting_couch&oldid=810564433 All the best! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Growlies (talk • contribs) 18:15, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for letting me know that the "Casting couch" page is looking better.Growlies (talk) 16:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conspiracy theorist on News

Yeah I thought that was a statement of someone at first and then I couldn’t find anyone with that name. Dogblock (talk) 13:01, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think you reporting the guy is a good idea Dogblock (talk) 13:13, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Man you seem pretty cool to talk to. Would you care to have a conversation off of Wikipedia? Dogblock (talk) 14:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring deleted messages on User Talk

Hi, I came across this edit where you restored the content of a (blocked) user's talk page after the user removed it, with edit summary: blanking any comment from any talk page is not allowed (unless it's a very clear personal attack, which is not the case here). Restoring comments.

While that is certainly true with talk pages in other namespaces, editors may remove messages from their own talk page, or blank it entirely (with a few exceptions: see WP:OWNTALK and WP:BLANKING). I haven't reverted you there since it's a moot point - the user hasn't edited the page for a month - but I just wanted to draw your attention to the actual guideline for User talk. byteflush _Talk 01:41, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tenses in English

On this edit, the difference between present perfect "has led" and pluperfect (past perfect) "had led" is whether the protests and the dip in the ratings are still ongoing, or now over and done with. When re-reading the source, I feel that these situations are still present: mentioned ratings are the most recent numbers and the Communist Party is still trying to obtain a national referendum. But hey, maybe you have ~~been knowing~~ known this all the way! Cheers. Wakari07 (talk) 19:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redneck Revolt

Hi EdgarCabreraFariña. Thanks for your edits. I just wanted to let you know that edits like this one to Redneck Revolt are generally considered unnecessary per WP:NOTBROKEN. The gist of that guideline is that links to redirects like Libertarian Socialism or U.S. Left or Gramscian usually don't need to be changed to link instead to those redirects' targets, and are best left as they are. In this case there isn't really any compelling reason to revert you, but I thought it best to let you know about the guideline for future reference. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 11:31, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit at Ana María Campos

Please read the article talk page and correct your edit; I’d do it myself but the undo tool says it overlaps Kingsif (talk) 12:26, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks; it’s how the Venezuelan government refer to her so it makes sense, have a good day. Kingsif (talk) 12:40, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi EdgarCabreraFariña! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:25, Monday, October 22, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from The Revival (professional wrestling). Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! StaticVapor message me! 17:01, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for 2019 Venezuelan blackout

On 14 March 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 Venezuelan blackout, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Step hen 22:44, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Marzo paraguayo) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marzo paraguayo.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Well-cited article about a notable event.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Balon Greyjoy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Balon Greyjoy (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Balon Greyjoy:: Thank you. It is much appreciated.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	WikiProject Latin America Barnstar
	I award you this barnstar for your tireless commitment to articles about Latin America. This barnstar should have been given to you years ago. Your work in this under-represented area of Wikipedia is greatly appreciated! MX (✉ • ✎) 16:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MX: Wow! I think this is a first for me, I love it. Thank you very much.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 16:32, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Edith González, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Meyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:16, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Rafael Acosta Arévalo) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Rafael Acosta Arévalo.

User:Kingsif while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

thanks for making this page!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingsif: Thanks for the recognition, it is much appreciated. EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Cinco fueron escogidos

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thanks for creating Cinco fueron escogidos! I edit here too, under the username Willsome429 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

If possible, please add more reliable sources to strengthen the page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:21, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Fernanda Young

Hi EdgarCabreraFariña. Is Fernanda Young a direct translation of pt:Fernanda Young at the Portuguese Wikipedia? – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 01:53, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alejandro Cobo

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thank you for creating Alejandro Cobo.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

You may want to provide more details on references 2-4.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dewritech}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Dewritech (talk) 12:06, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just ignore this message as I saw Bibliography too late.-- Dewritech (talk) 12:10, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Dewritech: Oh, don't worry. In any case, I'll see if I can find and add the ISBN. Thanks for checking it out.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 12:15, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!-- Dewritech (talk) 12:38, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Current events

You may not be aware of this, but the editing guidelines for the Current events portal say that "If a news item is part of a larger event, list it under a subheader consisting of a link to the larger event. Don't create subheaders linking to general topics or lists". So for example, "Legality of ridesharing companies by jurisdiction" should not be a subheader, but something like "2019 London protest against Uber" could be. Kaldari (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kaldari: Understood. Thanks for the heads up.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 10:01, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hell's Bloody Devils for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hell's Bloody Devils is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hell's Bloody Devils until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EdgarCabreraFariña, regarding the page for Hell's Bloody Devils, I have added a few things plus voted to keep it. There's a few more good refs out there but I may not time to improve the article. Cheers Karl Twist (talk) 08:28, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge

Your articles are welcome! Can you add films to the relevant pages on List of Mexican films (List of Mexican films of 1969) etc, trying to build a full coverage of Mexican movies, so if you can help build it that would be great. Hope you're well! Gracias!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Por mis pistolas (1938 film)

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thank you for creating Por mis pistolas (1938 film).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thank you for your new article on the film "Por mis pistolas", but please see WP:EXIST. More is needed beyond a simple mention of this film's existence, such as text from any professional reviews or scholarly analysis that it may have received.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 20:34, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for fixing my mistake on Quim Torra‎. I had been reviewing pending changes for a bit too long and got it exactly backwards. Cheers, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 04:23, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RT is more reliable than NYT

Although some people say that RT has been spreading propaganda and even fake news, actually The New York Times has been no better, and sometimes RT's coverage of a newsworthy event is closer to truth (cf, [2], [3], [4] & [5]), so you should not replace the RT news articles that I used in Portal:Current events/2020 March 8 with NYT ones.--RekishiEJ (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki Fritz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Fritz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Fritz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 18:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some baklava for you!

Hi I’ve just reviewed Alma llanera (film). Thanks for creating this and happy editing! Mccapra (talk) 23:08, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Current Events

Hello. I wanted to invite you to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events as you have done edits on Portal:Current events. Most editors aren't aware that the project became active again in April 2020. Just wanted to inform you about that and hope you join. Elijahandskip (talk) 18:14, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alert from WikiProject Current Events

Hello. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Current events format is currently being updated. However, one new change is a section for "Current discussions". The Portal:Current events has debates all the time to determine if things are notable for the portal (international news) or if they are better suited for a place like 2020 in the United States. In the past, small 'edit wars' have taken place between editors over topics. This new section on the WikiProject is a new place where editors can discuss between each other and have an easy access to 'outside opinion' from other participates. Members in the Current Event WikiProject are welcome to invite other editors that have disagreements to start the discussion on the WikiProject. (Unlike RFC's, discussions about topics would be about 1 week or whenever the topic is no longer relevant from the WikiProject).

Thank you for reading and thank you for participating in the Current Event WikiProject! (Current Event WikiProject Coordinator) Elijahandskip (talk) 19:10, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Twenty-Tens Decade Started

Hey. I know we have crossed paths every now and then on the Portal:Current events, so I wanted to invite you to a new WikiProject, the WikiProject of the Twenty-Tens decade. It was proposed near the end of May, but it was officially created today. Not sure if you would be interested, but I thought I would drop you an invite and say hi. Elijahandskip (talk) 02:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thank you for creating ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

To establish notability this needs a reception section with details of reviews in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 05:08, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Sara Suzanne Brown

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thank you for creating Sara Suzanne Brown.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

All references in this article are mentions only, and do not supply information. This article needs additional references to meet WP:GNG and/or WP:ANYBIO criteria. A suggestion is to look at WP:THREE as a guide.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:32, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex

The article ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 16:21, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna and Olivia case for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna and Olivia case is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna and Olivia case until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 15:21, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to give a quick thanks

I forgot I was using a VPN that can give me trouble sometimes, thank you for fixing and correcting my mistake. Cheers mate! The Introvert Next To You (talk) 15:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex

The article ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film appears to fail WP:NFILM with not enough reviews to pass the guidelines, with none found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 23:58, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex

The article ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ...And Give Us Our Daily Sex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/...And Give Us Our Daily Sex until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DonaldD23 talk to me 04:18, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Claudia Octavia

You massive ref change to Claudia Octavia left many cite errors. I hope you can fix them promptly, or it will be reverted. Why you make any such changes to a reviewed GA while on the Main page is beyond my understanding. Very generally: don't put too much in one edit. Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:27, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 41, el hombre perfecto for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 41, el hombre perfecto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/41, el hombre perfecto until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Call Girls of Rome

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña,

Thank you for creating Call Girls of Rome.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks, keep on making the project great. Please consider developing the article with more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bruxton (talk) 21:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unattributed translations

Please see WP:TFOLWP. You created Rebecka Fallenkvist as an unattributed translation of sv:Rebecka Fallenkvist, which is not allowed. Please follow the guidance in the linked page to correct this. Please also do this for older pages (e.g. María Duval (Argentine actress) was translated from the Spanish version), and also if there are pages which are partial translations (e.g. existing pages where you added text translated from other Wikipedia languages). Fram (talk) 13:16, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Widow's Assassin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Widow's Assassin, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Widow's Assassin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucy Boulton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucy Boulton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zig Zag (1975 film) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Zig Zag (1975 film), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucy Boulton

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucy Boulton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abby (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abby (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:05, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Brewster (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:06, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mila (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mila (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mila (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:16, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flip Jackson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flip Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip Jackson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Molly O'Sullivan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Molly O'Sullivan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly O'Sullivan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 01:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucy Boulton

Hello, EdgarCabreraFariña. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucy Boulton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:21, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mila (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mila (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mila (Doctor Who) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 19:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	Thank you for translating Tesla and unions on Spanish Wikipedia! You may find interested editors at es:Wikiproyecto:Sindicalismo. Happy editing! ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 14:25, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mary Shelley (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Shelley (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Shelley (Doctor Who) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 16:30, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello EdgarCabreraFariña! Your additions to Day of the Warrior have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Abby (Doctor Who) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abby (Doctor Who) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abby (Doctor Who) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 23:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Flip Jackson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flip Jackson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip Jackson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Pokelego999 (talk) 00:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Doomwood Curse

The article The Doomwood Curse has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of significant coverage and failing to meet general notability guidelines. There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online. Existing external link is production company's website. List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Torpedoi (talk) 21:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Brood of Erys

The article The Brood of Erys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of significant coverage and failing to meet general notability guidelines. There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online. Existing external link is production company's website. Existing references to do not constitute notability. List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Torpedoi (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Scavenger (audio drama)

The article Scavenger (audio drama) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of significant coverage and failing to meet general notability guidelines. There is a lack of reliable sources for this article online. Existing external link is production company's website. Existing references do not constitute notability. List reference to this article is at Doctor Who: The Monthly Adventures.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Torpedoi (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed but...

You accidentally removed {{commonscat|Meeple}} too. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:04, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moving references back and forth

Hi, EdgarCabreraFariña. In recent months, you have repeatedly popped up in my watchlist on pages where you move all list-defined references into the body with no rationale before quickly reverting that change. Like here -> here, here -> here, here (which I reverted), and here -> here. They look like editing tests and largely without a pattern, but you have been here for too long for these to be mistakes. Could you clarify what exactly these changes are for? If you need in-line references to translate the page into Spanish, is there a way to do it without saving the changes here? IceWelder [✉] 17:15, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@IceWelder: Hi. Yeah, I found trouble while doing translations. My apologies. From now on I'll look to do it in some other, less disruptive way. EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 17:45, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on The Great McGinty

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Great McGinty, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:50, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Juscelino Kubitschek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamantina.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for translating Qiao'ergou Catholic Church into Spanish!

I give you my thanks for your translation. Isn't it wonderful to learn about the Spanish presence in Northern China one hundred years ago? Indeed, a few more centuries ago, the Spanish missionaries fostered the very first Chinese Catholic bishop, Luo Wenzao, who was also called "Gregorio Lopez". Perhaps he could be of great interest to you for your next translation, if you are feeling ambitous. Muchas gracias vel in lingua origine, gratias tibi ago. Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 22:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viva Van speedy deletion

Hi. I've nominated Viva Van for speedy deletion; The article was previously deleted via consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Van in July. If you think there are valid reasons why the article should be recreated, my suggestion would be to start a new thread at Wikipedia:Deletion review. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 20:34, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Viva Van for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viva Van is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viva Van (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk) 21:14, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Viva Van

Hi @EdgarCabreraFariña, I'm voting to Keep your translation of Viva Van, I'm amazed this one was even nominated in the first place, her notability has increased recently with her appearances on AEW Dynamite and CMLL, I encourage you to fight this one. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 21:54, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]