User talk:Torpedoi

April 2020

		The Original Barnstar
		Thank you for your creation of the St Andrew's Church, Castle Combe page. It's great to know that the church is STILL in use.JohnmgKing (talk) 21:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashdon Hoard has been accepted

Ashdon Hoard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 02:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

PRODs

Hello, Torpedoi,

Please do not mass-tag articles for Proposed deletion or, really, any sort of deletion. We typically have 10-30 articles tagged as PRODs each day but Category:Proposed deletion as of 22 November 2023 lists over 100! I'm not suggesting that these articles shouldn't be deleted or that you should untag them. But if you take on a project like this again, please pace yourself and tag, maybe, a dozen articles/day over several days or a week. We typically have just two administrators reviewing each article to make sure it is eligible for deletion and so this would make a more balanced workload.

But thank you for all of your contributions to the project, they are appreciated! We just don't want to overwhelm the system of checks and balances. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:33, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'll keep that in mind for the future! Have a better one. Torpedoi (talk) 07:57, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe still working their way through but there's a big bulge of them proposed on 22 November I'm working through now, see below. ~Kvng (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Who PRODs

Sorry for all the deprodding. My fingers are sore. I'll bet yours are too. Not a good thing for either of us. It is simply not uncontroversial to propose so many articles for deletion in mass. At the very least it means they can't be properly evaluated. I suggest the best way to handle this is to open a single WP:AFD to discuss the fate of all these articles as a group. ~Kvng (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]