User talk:Heavy Grasshopper

Percy Maxim Lee = Mrs. John G. Lee

Thanks for your work on the article. I am delighted to see it finally published.

I have a question, though. I included "Mrs. John G. Lee" parenthetically after her name because that is the only way her name appears in the press at the time she was active in the League of Women Voters. I think the activities at that time are the ones that make her worth mention in wikipedia.

In fact, I had given up on the article because I was unable to find adequate references for her, until one day I was reading an NYT article and in passing saw the name "Mrs. John G. Lee". Just a little bit of research verified that it was indeed the same person, and so opened up the way to finding more information.

I think readers of this article should also be given that clue if they are interested in learning more. What do you think would be the best way to do it? Ngriffeth (talk) 14:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Ngriffeth. Having looked at the sources again, I agree with you. It is clear that "Mrs. John G. Lee" was the name commonly used by the press during her time as the President of the League of Women voters. I think perhaps the parentheses alone did not give sufficient context, so I have added a little sentence about that in the lead and body of the article. Feel free to change it if you think of a better way to do it. JohnmgKing (talk) 09:30, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@JohnmgKing Instead of often, I'm making it "almost always." But I'm certainly open to discussion on it.

I was a child in the 50s and in college in the 60s, and I remember well that in any formal situation the rule was to address a married woman as "Mrs. <husband's name>". My father had died when I was 2, so I found it confusing to address letters to my mother using only my father's name, but in fact addressing her as Mrs <her name> would have implied she was divorced, not widowed. And addressing her as "Miss" would have made her a single mother! And a woman just wasn't addressed without an honorific - just not done!!

Since we're Wikipedians, here's a reference: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/starting-in-the-1970s-womens-first-names-were-included-in-post-references/2019/11/23/73dc1eb2-0d59-11ea-bd9d-c628fd48b3a0_story.html. It says that by 1969, the Washington Post modernized a bit, but until 1989 it was only allowable, not required, to refer to a woman by her own name. The Post changed earlier than most papers, as far as I can tell, possibly because in 1963 Katherine Graham (of Watergate fame) became its publisher.

@Ngriffeth Thanks, that phrasing looks good to me. That context is very interesting, thank you very much for sharing the article. I have seen this during my lifetime only in relation to couples being referred to together: i.e Mr and Mrs John Smith, which I last saw on an insurance letter addressed to my parents just before the pandemic. I mentioned it to my mother, and we found it quite amusing, in the sense that it is an archaic practice. It is odd how something so fundamental changes so quickly. In any case, I'll have a more careful look at the sources in future when I see this kind of honorific usage in articles. JohnmgKing (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Lee probably wasn't an educator

Oops, another thing: saying she's an educator suggests that she taught at some point in her career. There's no evidence of that. She founded a school, but school founders tend to be philanthropists as well as teachers, and that seems more likely in her case.

She was also on several boards of educational institutions, but board members tend to be graduates or parents of students. And she served on a variety of commissions and task forces having nothing to do with education, but most of which would be called "do-good" organizations. I'm going to call her a political and social reformer.

Yes, I suppose despite being involved in some educational institutions, she wasn't a professional educator. All in all it looks to be going in the right direction. Thanks for creating the article, it's been an interesting read and I've learned something.JohnmgKing (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, JohnmgKing. Thank you for your work on Woman at Point Zero (opera). User:Schminnte, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thank you for this article. You may wish to expand it using other sources I have found: [1] [2] [3] [4].

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Schminnte}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Schminnte (talk • contribs) 14:58, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

@Schminnte Thanks for your message and the time you took to examine the page. I do plan to expand it. JohnmgKing (talk) 15:14, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Good stuff. Please keep writing detailed articles like this, they help to improve the encyclopedia as a whole. Happy editing! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:16, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Leading zeroes in decimals

Regarding your change to Natural Childbirth, I thought you might be interested to know that Wikipedia actually requires these leading zeroes, per MOS:DECIMAL. Regards, Dan Bloch (talk) 15:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the information. Good to see common sense policies. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 15:52, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:01, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grounded (opera)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Grounded (opera) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 18:22, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grounded (opera)

The article Grounded (opera) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Grounded (opera) and Talk:Grounded (opera)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:23, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grounded (opera)

The article Grounded (opera) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grounded (opera) for comments about the article, and Talk:Grounded (opera)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Grounded (opera)

On 23 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Grounded (opera), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Grounded, an opera about drone warfare, was sponsored by General Dynamics, a major military contractor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Grounded (opera). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Grounded (opera)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

WaggersTALK 00:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Michael Nevin (diplomat) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Nevin (diplomat) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Nevin (diplomat) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 22:40, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)