User talk:Canley/Archive 2008–2012
Awaiting your acceptance...
[edit]
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Footrot Flats movie.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Footrot Flats movie.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LAPD-lifeonthebeat.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:LAPD-lifeonthebeat.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Matrix 150.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Matrix 150.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Munster Football Association Logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Munster Football Association Logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter
[edit]
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||
Orphaned non-free media (Image:RMIT University logo.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:RMIT University logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:54, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
You are now an administrator
[edit]Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions drop me a message at my talk page. Best wishes, WjBscribe 23:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Wow, clean sweep! Well done dude! As I said, you're one of the folk I already thought was an admin! --rm 'w avu 02:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- No, thank you for becoming an admin. It's not a big deal, as Jimbo puts it, but it's an important piece in the puzzle. I notice you do lots of work on Aussie articles. I do lots of stuff over at WP:FING, the Powderfinger WP. If you're interested, we could always use an extra pair of hands (we do alright, though... as a project, we account for more GAs and FAs than any other project of its size in all of Wikipedia). --rm 'w avu 03:39, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well done!! --VS talk 11:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Well done! The very best of luck. Rudget. 18:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Just a few words
[edit]Congratulations on your recent acquisition of the mop. I offer to you a few words of wisdom:
- Start slowly and carefully. There's a huge temptation to start flying through your new duties as soon as the 'crat pushes the button - resist it. Avoid close calls for your first week or two, and leave it to those who happened to get their tools a little earlier than you.
- Be sure to connect in with other users on IRC, if you can. There's a whole pool of channels there where you can get assistance in your newly-acquired buttons, and get your new colleagues used to your name.
- Be ready for criticism in your first few weeks, but at the same time don't be a push-over. If you feel worried over a decision, get another user to take a look at it.
- When blocking, ask yourself if everything you've entered into that form will benefit Wikipedia: is the block length sufficiently long to prevent further disruption by a vandal, or is it so long that it will put them off ever returning? Is your protection just going to be a minor hiccup in the edit warrior's grand scheme of disruption, or will it hinder the growth of the encyclopedia?
Best of luck with your new buttons, and don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any queries.
Anthøny 18:59, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Congrats
[edit]Congrats on your adminship, and thank you for the assistance at Paddy Reilly (disambiguation)! --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 03:56, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Congratulations on your adminship!
I apologize if I am wrong about this, but I believe that a recent article on Australian television is not encyclopedic enough to be included in Wikipedia. I apologize for placing a speedy deletion tag on the article. Perhaps it would have been better to have placed a deletion tag instead. However the pages do not contain an article and are in fact, trivia lists. The pages would really fit if they were written in an article form, and if the article specified their notability. Otherwise I believe that the articles are not notable enough.
I believe this article in not encyclopedic. I base this on WP:NOT#STATS under Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Please correct me if this does not fall under said category. Also note User:Moonriddengirl's comments at [[1]]. Thank you for your time.
Closing AfDs
[edit]Hi Canley, just a reminder when closing AfDs, please remember to substitute the "Afd top" and "Afd bottom" templates (WP:DELPRO). I've fixed the Tumalip AfD, could you check back all your past closures to make sure everything is in order? Thank you, - PeaceNT (talk) 11:59, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
- You're welcome. If you plan on doing this stuff more often, you may consider using this helpful user script (just to reduce the bane of admin work). Congrats on your recent promotion, also. Take care and happy mopping, - PeaceNT (talk) 12:18, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy Deletion
[edit]Actually I did the right thing. Look at how the article was when I tagged it. Now you're right, its not.Ohmpandya (Talk to Me...) 03:10, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your messages. I wish I'd seen that so as I could have used the right speedy first time! No apology needed, of course. Would you have a moment to compare the deleted and recreated versions, please? Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 01:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Was Curious if I could get some clarification on the deletion of this article. There was plenty of sourcing and references, but internal and external to prove notability. I had seen the first version and it was admittedly much more sparse than this, and thus, I tried to create a new version after its initial deletion so that it fell in line with all the rules. What was your big drive on getting rid of it?--kstjames (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 04:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Dubay Cup
[edit]Now I saw, already exists another link called "Dubai Cup", so, can you, my friend, delete this created by me? This is unnecessary. Or can you merger this "Dubai cup" with "Dubai Cup" created by another Wikipedist, leaving as top redirect link "Dubai Cup" (the word Cup uppercase)? I have some kind of obsession for perfection. I think it is Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), hehehe. Thank you, Canley. Evandro Davis (talk) 02:04, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Looks like you and I are becoming frequent correspondents tonight/this morning! Anyway, I was going by extension of WP:NFF; the movie is failing at AfD and so that seemed like a poor basis for defending his notability. I think 'optioned by' must be quite a way short of 'attached to'. I'll send it to AfD in a while. Cheers, --AndrewHowse (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, Canley. I correct the links from Dubai Challenge Cup 2007 and Dubai Challenge Cup 2008. You are a good guy!
Obrigado. Evandro Davis (talk) 00:17, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
idea?
[edit]Let's form a small RFA class of 9. These are admin who became admin at about the same time. John Carter, Jeepday, Rudget, Jayron32, Archtransit, Appraiser, Kbthompson, Canley, J-stan. It would just be a friendly support group or like a school class. No administrative tasks needed, just know each other so if we need an opinion or want to discuss something, we'll be there for each other. Archtransit (talk) 19:19, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Willow Creek Pass (Montana) Deletion Review
[edit]Hi Canley. I'm not asking you to change your mind about your closing of the AfD on Willow Creek Pass (Montana). It was a call that could go either way, and whichever way it went I would go for a DRV because there appears to be a strong feel in some areas of the community that all features on maps should have stand alone articles, even though there is no guideline or wider "official" consensus supporting that view. A deletion review of whichever decision a closing admin made, if then supported by the review, could be used in guidelines. So I am saying that I feel it appropriate that a review is done, but wanted to make sure you were OK with that, and the reasons for the review. Regards SilkTork *What's YOUR point? 00:14, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
- Cool. I'll do that tomorrow. I'm off to bed now! Good night. SilkTork *What's YOUR point? 00:41, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Centralized TV Episode Discussion
[edit]Over the past months, TV episodes have been redirected by (to name a couple) TTN, Eusebeus and others. No centralized discussion has taken place, so I'm asking everyone who has been involved in this issue to voice their opinions here in this centralized spot, be they pro or anti. Discussion is here [2]. Even if you have not, other opinions are needed because this issue is affecting all TV episodes in Wikipedia. --Maniwar (talk) 02:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Job cover Aug 2006.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:The Job cover Aug 2006.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 09:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rimington large.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Rimington large.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]Thanks a lot for that input you gave on my article on Shantel, Canley! Was in a little pickle. I really appreciate it. You should check him out if you like - pretty good original stuff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelmcandrew (talk • contribs) 14:19, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Mega City (The Matrix)
[edit]I have nominated Mega City (The Matrix), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mega City (The Matrix). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 21:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
Lingua Franca Nova AfD
[edit]Hi,
You closed Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lingua Franca Nova as keep.
There clearly was no consensus.
I was the nominator, so you don't have to count my arguments, but at least one user, User:Schaefer, presented well-explained reasons for deletion, backed with policy - the article does not have any non-trivial secondary sources. Other users' comments also pointed out the lack of verifiable sources.
Please reconsider this. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 12:34, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment regarding the AfD for Lingua Franca Nova. I stand by my decision that there was no consensus to delete the article after seven days of discussion. According to the deletion process guideline, consensus is required to delete, but in the absence of that reasonable consensus, and even in more borderline cases, the default action is to keep the article. I read all your arguments very carefully, and I agree that the references could be made better, but that's the point – they could be made better, and hopefully they will be.
- If you feel strongly that the article should be deleted, and that you may be able to encourage a more satisfactory (to yourself) outcome or a clearer consensus with a reworded nomination, you are welcome to nominate the article for AfD again. If you feel I have made an incorrect decision regarding policy and consensus, youcan take this to Wikipedia:Deletion review. --Canley (talk) 12:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
- Can you at least write that the result was no consensus? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
User:DanielT5/Town
[edit]there is no such town called x therefor the page called User:DanielT5/Town has to be delete User:Silverhorse —Preceding comment was added at 06:31, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
From the delete reason you gave in the log, it seems you didn't even read the comments I added in the {{hangon}}, nor the additional comments I added on the talk page. I'd appreciate an explanation. NSH001 (talk) 14:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Article Deletion - I disagree - how can it be changed?
[edit]Re "The Union Theatre" article by me, germahughes, I'm wondering why it would be deleted for violating Wikipedia's advertising rules if the theatre being articled is no longer open (it ran from 1989 - 1996). I did a timely dispute of the "speedy deletion" tag (within about 10 hours) and it looks like that was not quick enough. How can I go about re-instating this or grieving this removal? I'm just confused HOW the article violated and would be considered "blatant advertising" if the theatre is not in existence any longer. With thanks for your time on this.
--Germahughes (talk) 23:21, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
== Thanks for your help - yes, please reinstate the original material ==
Thanks for your recent message. If you could, as you mentioned, repost the original article I would prefer to re-edit and clarify from that. I will indeed work on all drafts on the sub-page to make life a bit easier. I will also alter the verb tense to read consistently as past to help with clarity. Thanks again for your time.--Germahughes (talk) 00:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Reply
[edit]Wait I dont know what your talking about. NimiTize 02:53, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
TruDef
[edit]Hi Canley, you declined my request for speedy deletion of TruDef saying "does not look like obvious spam". However the article is for a unreleased product of a company and is sourced only from their web page. The company btw is a "pink sheet" penny stock with a history of fraud. How much more obvious does it need to be? This is totally corporate vanity. If you agree that the page should be removed but that speedy deletion is the wrong mechanism, please help me find the right way to protect the wikipedia. Spot (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Tas pollies
[edit]Most articles are vacuous uninformative whitewash missing in action lacking of anything of what they used to really get up to - trust you might help out with either refs or further oversight - cheers SatuSuro 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- btw you prove my theory - there are more taswegains in melbourne than there are in tas :| SatuSuro 03:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- If we had the quality of article like the tas police one around - oz wikipedia would be a better place imho - i have tried to do the hec article with more like at tas police - actual list of names of the ministers and ceo s etc - but struggling - thnsk for your reply - id appreciate any oversight or comment on the tas pol arts - their histry is more colourful than melb criminals :) SatuSuro 04:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Next Melb meetup = Wikimedia Australia incorporation meeting
[edit]
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
 | |
Hope you can make it :) cheers --pfctdayelise (talk) 09:56, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Redirects Are Cheap
[edit]Hey Canley, I saw you use the phrase "redirects are cheap" at AfD and wanted to know your meaning. Do you mean redirects are easy and we can make many of them or do you mean that redirects are a bad way of handling the situation as in the phrase "That's a cheap shot". Just trying to clarify because I think I've seen the phrase used a few times recently (not specifically by you, but in general).--Torchwood Who? (talk) 13:40, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- That's what I thought you meant, but I just wanted to make sure I wasn't reading things wrong. Much appreciated.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 23:01, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
George Negus Tonight
[edit]Many thanks for picking up my tentative suggestion and bringing it to life so quickly. I was amazed to see how much detail you managed to put together. I didn't intend my post at the noticeboard to be a request for someone else to do it; I was only looking to obtain support so that it would survive an AfD. I'd expected to put it on my to-do list and that it would be like chopping ironwood with a blunt axe when I did get to it (and it would have been too!). Retarius | Talk 02:19, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections
[edit]The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Happy First Day of Spring!
[edit]
Just wishing you a wonderful First Day of Spring {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}! ~~~~
To spread this message to others, add {{subst:First Day Of Spring}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Azaria is the new ACOTF
[edit]Azaria Chamberlain disappearance is the new Australian collaboration. As you nominated it, you might like to coordinate the collaboration, such as by creating a to do list on its talk page. --Scott Davis Talk 14:45, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
RE: Speedy Deletion
[edit]ORIGINAL MESSAGE: I've declined the speedy deletion, the book has won a literary award. --Canley (talk) 01:53, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank You So much!! I was almost in tears! Some of these Wiki users aren't to polite. Just abruptly getting to the point is not polite. Thank you!
Obaidz96 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Obaidz96 (talk) 02:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC) Once again, Thank You!
Speedy deletion
[edit]Terribly sorry. Will do. --Non-dropframe (talk) 02:16, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Tasmanian Barnstar
[edit]Hi Canley, I just saw on your userpage that you're a wikigraphic artist. I was wondering, as a Tasmanian born wikipedia contributor, if you would be willing to tidy up my Tasmanian barnstar, as graphics aren't really my thing. I tried my best but it still looks a bit messy... Template:The Tasmanian Barnstar of Merit Robert Fleming (talk) 11:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi! I think that it should be deleted because there is no club with this name. There is one called ASK Olympiakos Volos F.C. and another called Ethnikos Olympiakos Volos F.C.. - Sthenel (talk) 13:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Yes there is a huge confusion and argument about these two clubs which are actually one. Thank you very much! - Sthenel (talk) 14:18, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Hobart
[edit]Hey I noticed what you can do - but any help in getting dormant arts and cats re hobart would be very encouraging SatuSuro 06:10, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
kindly go here
[edit]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Super_Cassette_Vision —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pearll's sun (talk • contribs) 16:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
- many thanks 4 ur reply .--@ the $un$hine . (talk) 12:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
1349 Woking Squadron
[edit]
Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article 1349 Woking Squadron, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Deaths in 2008
[edit]
An editor has nominated Deaths in 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths in 2008 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:00, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
John Cushley DYK
[edit]
|
On 5 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Cushley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Hobart fort's map
[edit]Hi Canley. You did such a wonderful job on upgrading my Tasmanian Barnstar I thought I would come and pester you for something else... I wanted to add a map to the article I primarily wrote on Hobart coastal defences, and drew a hand-drawn version, but it doesn't come out very well on screen. I am not really capable of doing graphics drawn things like maps, and was wondering you would consider having a go when you have time, or reccommending someone else?? This is my hand-drawn version: 
. Robert Fleming (talk) 14:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Excellent work on the map, that is just the thing. I will put it into the article right away. Please have a look at the article and see what you think of my choice of placement etc. I don't know how you did it, but brilliant job! Robert Fleming (talk) 11:38, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of 1349 Woking Squadron
[edit]An editor has nominated 1349 Woking Squadron, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1349 Woking Squadron and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
CSD tag
[edit]The tag was on the AFD page as intended. I made the nomination in error, as I hadn't seen that the page was legitimate before the massive amount of edits that User:Jerzymasta3 made. — scetoaux (T|C) 01:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Azriel (Band)
[edit]I've never been involved in editing the aforementioned page, but I know that it has been deleted in the past due to issues with notability. The band have now released their debut album which has been tipped to be the best metal album of 2008, I could find plenty of sources to show that the band now have sufficient notability to warrant an article (I disagreed with the article's existence in the past).
I wanted to find out some information on them and their recent success (they're old friends) and realised it had recently been deleted by yourself - "recreation of a deleted article". Just wondering how one would go about recreating this page and ensuring that it isn't deleted on the basis that it is a 'previously deleted article'? Ta :) -dannerz (talk) 02:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
another nom
[edit]
- ...that John Lavarack was the first person born in Australia to be an Australian State Governor? Canley (ref 4( a short and sweet nom. ok? Victuallers (talk) 17:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
Miles Franklin Award
[edit]I'm curious as to why you deleted the Table of Contents on the Miles Franklin Award. I admit I thought it a bit over the top having an entry for each year's shortlist but a five or six entry ToC seems reasonable to me. Perry Middlemiss (talk) 10:28, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]|
|
On 20 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Lavarack, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Wizardman 15:52, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Bogan page move reversal
[edit]This really is an article naming dispure. The approach of subordinating proper nouns (whether for family names or locations) that long pre-date any recent popular cultural use doesn't allow distinguishing the history associated with the names/locations or distinguishing geographic perspectives. As you have seen with the Australian/NZ context, the term is perjorative in nature and offensive to some. The temporary articles I submitted to separate proper nouns that offer a different perspective of the individuals who bear the name "Bogan" keep getting deleted by some editors who want to collapse the work into the dismbiguation page. The cultural origins of the term 'bogan' is Australian/New Zealand and of recent vintage. The cultural origins of the Bogan family name from England, Ireland, and Germany goes back to at least the 6th century from my research and reflects contributions that distinguish the bearers of the name markedly from the Australian form and stereotype (cultured, pioneers, educators, attoneys, politicians, etc.).
From what I read of the wiki policy, when there is a naming conflict (and there is) it is appropriate to qualify the name (i.e., the Friendly Fire example). Failure to distinguish the 'bogan' pejorative form from the 'Bogan' proper noun form equally is poor social etiquette. The limitations of the the Wiki tool on capitalization is a weakness that separates it from traditional encyclopedia manuals of style. The policy also says that common sense should prevail as well. Propagation of the use of the capitalized form of the word as referenced from Wikipedia has spread to other websites (http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Bogan and http://www.okcupid.com/tests/take?testid=3765905512788389388). The strange thing is that the wikitionary only got it partially right, relative to the capitalization (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/bogans). So from a neutral point of view, there are more than one cultural/geographic perspective that should be addressed and a resolution of the naming conflict should be more than cobbling toghther a disambiguation page that subordinates other cultural/geographic perspectives.
TyrODonnell (talk) 01:15, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
HMMM all that sounds a bit wordy to me- how do we get the (important ) bogan page back up?Cilstr (talk) 15:32, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Spooks summaries
[edit]Apologies for removing all of the summaries; most of the series 3 ones were copied verbatim from the BBC's website... Sceptre (talk) 14:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
4/29 2008
[edit]|
|
On 29 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tasmanian power referendum, 1981, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Bedford 19:27, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll
[edit]
Hello there Canley/Archive 2008–2012,
We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.
Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
--Mifter (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I would like to remind you that "1st Baron Lugard" should not be noted as "Baron Lugard" because this is used to describe life peer. Although his peerage came into extinction upon his death, it is proper for him to be titled as "1st Baron Lugard". Other examples include William Whitelaw, 1st Viscount Whitelaw, David Maxwell Fyfe, 1st Earl of Kilmuir, George Thomas, 1st Viscount Tonypandy and etc.--Clithering (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
Edmund Dwyer Gray
[edit]Nice work on the new Edmund Dwyer Gray (Irish politician) article. Quick question - when you were researching it, did you come across anything about his support (and then fall-out) with Parnell? I was actually thinking about creating an article on ED Gray last week, and was going to add a bit about his Parnell connections, but I couldn't find any supporting refs. The DNB has a lot of stuff on him, and mentions his initial support for Parnell (speaking out against imprisonment/etc). According to the Parnell article, it looks like Gray and the Journal turned against Parnell (when much of the country's establishment did) following the divorce crisis. Do you think it's worth mentioning? Guliolopez (talk) 11:01, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
- Canley, thanks for saving my article. Elizabeth Fones was notable; in fact, she may have been the first woman in the American colonies to remarry while her prior husband still lived.jeanne (talk) 16:53, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit]Just to let you know that the editing guidelines suggest that a non-breaking space, , should be left between numbers and units; this ensures they stay on the same line as one another. You recently removed one at Ireviken event and I thought I'd let you know why it was there. Best wishes, and thanks for your categorisation! Smith609 Talk 15:57, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ah, is that what happened! Sorry, I should have double checked. Smith609 Talk 22:15, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Do you know what is the economy and demographics of El Clavo? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:22, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- Also this article states El Clavo is a town. Can you place tell what is the process to distinguish between city, town, village and hamlet? On what basis these four types of settlements are differentiated? Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 12:24, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't understand why you won't delete this page from wikipedia ? It is pointless and confusing to keep it. Please read WP:COMMONS in particular : Please do not categorize Commons files on Wikipedia but rather help commons by categorizing them there. there is no point keeping a page that only contains a link to a category. It is what is known as an "empty image". Jackaranga (talk) 14:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]|
|
On 11 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Penelope Wensley, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Congrats! --Gatoclass (talk) 15:08, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]|
|
On 20 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jigalong, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Gatoclass (talk) 10:46, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
Penelope Wensley
[edit]Hi. I haven't reverted your edits, but has Wensley actually been sworn in yet? I know it's scheduled for sometime this afternoon. In future, probably best to wait till it's actually happened and we have a citation. Theoretically, she could fall under a bus 10 minutes before the swearing in was due to take place, and would die as "governor-designate". Cheers. -- JackofOz (talk) 03:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
DYK
[edit]|
|
On 31 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Norman Gregg, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
--Admrb♉ltz (t • c • log) 04:08, 31 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi Canley, have you got a copy of the Who Weekly with Tjandamurra O'Shane? I would like to put it in the article, but I don't have a reference. Thanks, --Lester 07:43, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look, Canley. Regards, --Lester 09:29, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
[edit]Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 07:18, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The August 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
[edit]Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 20:27, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
Penny Sackett
[edit]Hi Canley and thanks for your contributions to Penny Sackett, they have certainly improved the article. One question I do have is your change in the date formatting. MOS:DATE allows the typical Australian date format (dd Month yyyy) and given that the subject has clear national ties to Australia, I think the Australian format is more appropriate. Your thoughts, please? Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 01:28, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- On reflection, changing the date format would lead to an inconsistency between the infobox and the main body. Given your completely rational explanation and that the date format really isn't a big deal, I am probably content to leave it as is. Thanks again for your help. Cheers, Mattinbgn\talk 01:51, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films September 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The September 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also note that after the roll call for active members, we've cleared the specialized delivery lists. Feel free to sign-up in the relevant sections again!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:22, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| For your prompt work in creating quality, well referenced articles to populate Category:Chief Scientists of Australia. -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC) |
Biographies of scientists etc. are often neglected compared to fly-by-night pop culture figures and obscure state back-benchers. It is good to see someone restoring the balance, if only in a small way. Well done. -- Mattinbgn\talk 09:46, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
question...
[edit]The list of assassinated people has been nominated for deletion.
I was going to quote the comment you made fifteen months ago, until I re-read it. Did that original nominator state that the references should stay in the original articles? The current nominator thinks each list entry requires a reference, even if the article devoted to the subject has references to support the claim.
Here is your comment:
- I disagree with the nominator's assertion that this information only belongs in the subject's articles, and the suggestion that the old "indiscriminate information" anti-list catch-all applies. Can do with some cleanup, but the ones I checked are pretty well referenced, and as long as the lists are restricted to notable individuals (i.e. subjects of a Wikipedia article), they are a notable and worthwhile inclusion. --Canley 13:14, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 22:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films October 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The October 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have suggestions or comments related to the newsletter, please leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you and happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:56, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
- Fred Clark (candidate) won on November 4, 2008. http://www.madison.com/tct/top5/312951 he is inaugerated 1/5/09. He is not subject to deletion. (Liveblue82 (talk) 01:57, 26 November 2008 (UTC))
WikiProject Films November 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The November 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. My apologies for the late delivery, and thanks go to both Wildroot and Erik for writing the newsletter. Remember that anyone can edit the newsletter, so feel free to help out! Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 08:19, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Australia newsletter,December 2008
[edit]
| ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||
This newsletter was delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 06:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
1yr of sysopship
[edit]Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Canley.
1 year since that opened. Time flies, eh? :)
Happy New Year, Canley.
AGK 12:49, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- 1 whole year, and you've done fantastically. Keep up the good work. Master&Expert (Talk) 08:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Films December 2008 Newsletter
[edit]The December 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Questionnaire
[edit]As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:53, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films January 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject Films newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you and happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films February 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The February 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:59, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Your DYK Nomination
[edit]
Hello! Your submission of Robert Bruce (wrestler) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! ∗ \ / (⁂) 11:12, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, just wondering where you might have sourced that Blewett quit in 1993? Timeshift (talk) 03:46, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Tender Mercies
[edit]Hey, I'm Hunter. I see you're part of the Australian cinema task force. I nominated the movie Tender Mercies, by Australian director Bruce Beresford, for a featured article after working on the page quite a bit. You're certainly under no obligation if you don't have the time, but if you have any comments for the FAC review or just any comments in general, I'd appreciate them. Thanks! --Hunter Kahn (talk) 15:45, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Coordinator nominations
[edit]DYK for Robert Bruce (wrestler)
[edit]|
|
On March 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Bruce (wrestler), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Royalbroil 03:01, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Alan Landers
[edit]|
|
On March 10, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alan Landers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS Coordinator Election
[edit]WikiProject Films March 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The March 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:58, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
Vote for Football as the Australian collaboration
[edit]Hi -- I recently nominated Wikipedia:WikiProject Football (soccer) in Australia/To-do for the Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight.
This WikiProject has been inactive for a long time and with the World Cup coming up, it would be good for football (soccer) articles to be in depth and comprehensive in Australia.
If you would like to support it, click here for the project page to cast your vote
Thanks! Australian Matt (talk) 02:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Panic Restaurant.png)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Panic Restaurant.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:23, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films April 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The April 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:38, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films May 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The May 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 23:18, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films June 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The June 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:22, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Adrian Cole
[edit]Many thanks for your addition of the settlement news to this article. I hadn't seen anything in the news since the SMH reported this issue, despite periodical searches, so it was a very pleasant surprise to see it closed out this way and added to the final paragraph. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:59, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Into My Arms
[edit]|
|
On July 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Into My Arms, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 12:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Article
[edit]Really enjoyed your article on the Surafend affair. Very interesting read. Cheers, Spy007au (talk) 07:05, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films July 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The July 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:46, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Surafend affair
[edit]|
|
On August 3, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Surafend affair, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
BorgQueen (talk) 08:14, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
ITN for MV Princess Ashika
[edit]
|
On 6 August, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article MV Princess Ashika, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page. |
--BorgQueen (talk) 16:30, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
Fair use image File:Princess ashika.jpg
[edit]Hi Canley. I noticed your contributions to MV Princess Ashika and could use a bit of help on it. I reluctantly decided to add the image File:Princess ashika.jpg to the article under a fair-use rationale. I say reluctantly, because while I feel the article benefits from a photograph, my observation is that 90% of the time, an editor adding a fair-use image is tarred-and-feathered for the effort. (I see from your talk page that you've been on the receiving end of this process in the past, as well.) If you can see any way to strengthen the argument for using the photo, I'd appreciate the help. If not, that's cool too. :) Cheers. HausTalk 17:38, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Have merged my version with yours - will try and populate with a few more independent verifiable references but am guessing it should be sufficient as stands to avoid non-Oz editors wanting to delete it again. Let me know if you ever come up against any worthy Australian articles that are proposed to be deleted (particularly music related) and I'll swing by and see if I can't assist. Dan arndt (talk) 01:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Australian Military Court
[edit]|
|
On August 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Australian Military Court, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
NW (Talk) 05:16, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films August 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The August 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Interview
[edit]Hi. I'm doing a study about Wikipedia (particularly about sysops) for my Masters in Communications and Media Studies at Monash Uni, and was wondering if you would be so kind as to take some time to talk to me. I'm mostly interested in what your day-to-day activities are and your relationship with other sysops and editors. It shouldn't take more than 30 minutes.
Please let me know if you're interested/willing. It would be immensely appreciated :) Cheers, In continente (talk) 08:17, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: I Love America
[edit]Hello Canley, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I declined the speedy deletion of I Love America - a page you tagged - because: A7 does not apply to films, and the band is notable. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. decltype (talk) 14:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, didn't notice that you self-reverted. Any reason in particular? decltype (talk) 14:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, as you may have guessed, the first message is an automated message from the script I am using. I noticed afterwards that you did not tag it, but the script usually notifies the person who last reinstated the tag. Thanks for the notification. Regards, decltype (talk) 01:44, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILM September Election Voting
[edit]The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 01:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for closing the above AfD. Sorry for the hassle! RupertMillard (Talk) 11:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
WikiProject Films September 2009 Newsletter
[edit]The September 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 06:26, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Rodger Doxsey
[edit]Hi, Thanks for the changes you made to the article, except I reverted the date of birth as I think it is not known, at least not in the obit. He was 62 at his death, which means he was probably born in 1947, but he could have been born late in 1946. But maybe you have better information? Thanks -- Wwheaton (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Wonderful, thanks! Wwheaton (talk) 17:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
October 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Deaths in 2009, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 05:38, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying! I had a feeling that you were trying to revert, but I was not sure. I've struck out the notice above. Kiteinthewind Leave a message! 05:43, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Werner Heubeck
[edit]|
|
On October 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Werner Heubeck, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Gatoclass (talk) 17:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC) 19:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Rodger Doxsey
[edit]|
|
On October 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rodger Doxsey, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Wikiproject: Did you know? 02:14, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS October Newsletter
[edit]The October 2009 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. The newsletter includes details on the current membership roll call to readd your name from the inactive list to the active list. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 05:50, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
WP:FILMS' Tag & Assess Drive and Roll Call
[edit]Ling-Hsueh Tang
[edit]Hey Canley - Do you have a source for Ling-Hsueh Tang being a host of Play School? I would include it in her article, but it's not listed on her IMDB site and I don't want to mention it without a source since the AfD is pending. Many thanks, H0n0r (talk) 05:00, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Canley, I am not that good at the AfD stuff, however I was looking at Pedro Julio Serrano which seems to me as self-promotional and vanity. The references which appear on the page are all personal and related to to the subject. Do you know of anyone who may be interested in reviewing the merits of the article and if it belongs in Wikipedia? Thank you. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:44, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]An editor born in Tasmania - rare bread :) Aaroncrick (talk)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Canley! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 4 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 6 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Owen Paterson (production designer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Yigal Tumarkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Helen Craig - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Nikki Gemmell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:23, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
A confusing edit
[edit]Coffee is bullying and threatening an editor about removing PROD tags
[edit]As an admin can you look at this please? I message a couple of other admins too. User_talk:Power.corrupts#Warning Ikip 05:43, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
Content
Marshall Perron
[edit]Terrific job on that rewrite. Wish we saw a few more of those these days. :) Rebecca (talk) 12:38, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Marshall Perron
[edit] Hello! Your submission of Marshall Perron at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bradjamesbrown (talk) 10:46, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Marshall Perron
[edit]|
|
On February 9, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marshall Perron, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:00, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
GG
[edit]Is it ignorance, arrogance, vandalism, or a combination? I mean seriously... what a joke... IPs are getting worse and worse... Timeshift (talk) 22:32, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Bert Tatham has been nominated for deletion again here
[edit]You are being notified because you participated in a previous Afd regarding this article, and you deserve a chance to weigh in on this article once again. --Mkativerata (talk) 10:15, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
File:Pactelephone.png in now a SVG
[edit]Hi, I just wanted to let you know that it appears you made significant contributions to File:Pactelephone.png or one of it's predecessors and that it has now been made into a vector graphic at File:Pactelephone.svg when working with this logo please remember to use the SVG where it is superior, Thanks Koman90 (talk), Network+ 19:22, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Thank goodness for that! Do you think moving him to Norman Cameron (politician) is appropriate? Anything to get rid of one of the inexplicably numerous Donald Camerons ... Frickeg (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, sounds good. (It's even more confusing considering that half of the Donald Camerons aren't even related - there's the SA senator, the three Queensland MPs (Donald Alastair, Donald James, Donald Milner), none of whom are related to each other or to the Tasmanian branch of the family ...) Frickeg (talk) 06:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- I've moved it. It seems clear from a number of sources I've seen that "Norman Cameron" was the name by which he was known. Good work again for picking it up! Frickeg (talk) 08:21, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Centurion game cover.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Centurion game cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:53, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
The article Sun Hill has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 23:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Sun Hill
[edit]
I have nominated Sun Hill, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sun Hill. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Neelix (talk) 03:02, 30 June 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Truth (novel)
[edit] | On July 10, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Truth (novel), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for The Feather Men
[edit] | On July 19, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Feather Men, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Rlevse • Talk • 18:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
2PP graph
[edit]Can you just wait before you trace the other one? I need to correct a spelling error. -- Lear's Fool 13:31, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- If it's not too much work, can I get you to tell me how you fixed the text in the graph? I have inkscape, but I'm not sure how to use it to "trace the text" or whatever magic you did. -- Lear's Fool 10:45, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks. I'll give that a shot. -- Lear's Fool 11:12, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Kurt Adler
[edit]A tag has been placed on Kurt Adler, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Senate
[edit]I'm going alphabetically - so done ACT, doing NSW now. Feel free to do any you want, but if you're busy I don't mind doing them myself (I get quite a lot of enjoyment out of them, oddly enough). Frickeg (talk) 11:44, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Hold on - what's the Climate Change Coalition doing in Victoria? There are a few other things that look a bit wrong too ... (Told you it was fun!) Frickeg (talk) 12:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Ah, the Building Australia Party. We've tried and tried, but we can't find a scintilla of evidence for what they're about, apart from the odd unciteable blog source. Which is all the more bizarre, since they've been registered in NSW for a couple of years now. Hopefully they'll get some press in the campaign and we can write an article about them, and have all nice blue links again. Frickeg (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- PS - I've done a few other fixes as well (last election's CCE had got left in the Climate Sceptics, which is I think why you were one out) ... otherwise nice work! Frickeg (talk) 13:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I get the feeling there might be a few typos here and there - a few of the spellings of candidates' names were different from how I remember them in previous elections. Hopefully it'll settle down over the next few days. Frickeg (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- So you're doing WA, then? Speaking of which, I'm seeing a few familiar faces in there - Anthony Fels, Paddy Embry, and of course Gerry Georgatos. There seems to be a proliferation of independents this time around, I've noticed, and a serious decrease (mainly in the HoR) of micro-parties, primarily due to what seems to be a collapse in the formerly reliable CEC and the continued decline of the Democrats and One Nation. Frickeg (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- No grievous errors that I saw - just that Glenn Sterle wasn't linked or bolded. I also swapped Family First and the Democrats, hope you agree - since FF is likely to do significantly better. Otherwise, though - a job well done! (Now to keep an eye on all the people who will create bios for minor candidates, which we'll have to deal with ... I went through the whole process with Stephen Hegedus earlier (Prod, then AfD), only to discover the editor was trying an experiment. Gah.) Frickeg (talk) 13:43, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- So you're doing WA, then? Speaking of which, I'm seeing a few familiar faces in there - Anthony Fels, Paddy Embry, and of course Gerry Georgatos. There seems to be a proliferation of independents this time around, I've noticed, and a serious decrease (mainly in the HoR) of micro-parties, primarily due to what seems to be a collapse in the formerly reliable CEC and the continued decline of the Democrats and One Nation. Frickeg (talk) 13:26, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I get the feeling there might be a few typos here and there - a few of the spellings of candidates' names were different from how I remember them in previous elections. Hopefully it'll settle down over the next few days. Frickeg (talk) 13:15, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
DYK for David Warren (inventor)
[edit] | On August 2, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Warren (inventor), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 18:03, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
The article Mega City (The Matrix) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- As per the speculation tag, this article is basically one big piece of original research, and what sources are used, most are not reliable sources for the purpose of Wikipedia.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Russavia I'm chanting as we speak 07:20, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
The truth hurts
[edit]Lol at your "vandalism" warning. Go on block me for telling the truth. Admit you fap to lolicon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.100.255.216 (talk) 01:01, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Hyphens/minus signs in electoral results
[edit]Hi - thanks for doing Tassie electoral results! As you may have seen, I've put the en-dashes back to hyphens for the moment. While I agree that in principle they're not ideal, they're consistently used in the literally thousands of result tables across WP:AUP. I take full responsibility for this; the job was big enough without having to go through formatting those dashes, and the hyphens are not really a huge problem. But en-dashes/minus signs are probably better; do you know if a bot could possibly be brought into commission to fix these? Frickeg (talk) 02:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Ticketek logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Ticketek logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:33, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
Are you aware of...
[edit]User:Unlimited Nature, a new user apparently adopting your persona? Is this the sincerest form of flattery, or do I need to warn an admin of the illegitimacy of sockpuppetry? Kevin McE (talk) 15:37, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
The article Johnny Simpson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Adabow (talk · contribs) 20:16, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Blind (film)
[edit]Hi. After the article was nominated for speedy deletion I left a note at user's talkpage who nominated it, saying that I'm currently working on it and I thought he would reconsider and remove his template for deletion, he didn't. Of course I could delete the template by myself, but this step, even me being aware that the film can survive here, wouldn't be gentle. Userpd (talk) 00:23, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Next drive
[edit]As you are either a participant of WikiProject or the October wikification drive or have signed up to participate in the planned December drive, this probably concerns you. Discussions that have been inactive for a couple weeks regarding the December drive have been reactivated, and we would like you to participate in these discussions, and also consider joining the December drive. We have taken upon ourselves a massive workload, encompassing a backlog reaching June 2008 and comprising 0 articles. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors, and also, please invite your friends to join! Please do not reply to this message here. Either reply here, here or here.
For the December Drive Coordinators, WikiCopter (talk · contribs).
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:27, 29 November 2010 (UTC).
Invitation to particpate in the December 2010 Wikification Drive
[edit] | Hi there! I thought you might be interested in the December 2010 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We're currently recruiting help to clear a massive backlog (22,000+ articles), and we need your help! Participants in the drive will receive barnstars for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:32, 30 November 2010 (UTC).
Please confirm your membership
[edit] | This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify. You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify. Thank you for your support, WikiProject Wikify |
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:23, 22 December 2010 (UTC).
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Australian Barnstar of National Merit | |
| For your work maintaining the "Year in Australia" pages. Thank you Mattinbgn (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| this WikiAward was given to Canley by Mattinbgn (talk) on 20:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for your helpful edits to the new article I created, at The Mystery of a Hansom Cab. Much appreciated! ;) Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 18:25, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Wally Peterson edits
[edit]Dear Canley,
It was disappointing to see that you had erased all the work we had done to Wally Peterson's page. We can assure you that the text is ours. If you have any other concerns, please contact us before making any changes.
Respectfully,
The Peterson Estate Robertalouise (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
delete
[edit]please can you delete my talk page Ant682 (talk) 20:15, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Irish of Vincennes
[edit] | On 30 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Irish of Vincennes, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the "Irish of Vincennes", three Irish nationals arrested in Paris on terrorism charges in 1982, were framed by members of a Presidential secret police unit? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar | |
| For your efforts on Virgin Australia and related articles following the airline's rebranding today, I hereby award you this Barnstar. YSSYguy (talk) 07:31, 4 May 2011 (UTC) |
May 2011
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mud Men, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you! -- Island Monkey talk the talk 18:23, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Ministries
[edit](LOL at the talk entry above this!!)
Not sure if you know of the series "A Handbook of Australian Government and Politics" by Colin A. Hughes which covers the years 1890-1974, 1975-1984 and 1985-1999 in different volumes. While the ordering on particularly durable ministries gets way out of hand (read: don't trust it), it's very useful for making sure one has got the right dates and "dotted the i's / crossed the t's" for ministerial transitions. (Also gives some useful explanations as to why the transition occurred for the benefit of the footnotes). I think you were one of the people I sent my CD of journals to, if you were, the Political Chronicles for that state are useful to the same end.
The online gazettes for Victoria are brilliant because we have the primary source right there - WA is also somewhat online from 1938 onwards but hard to search pre-1964. Queensland doesn't even have five weeks online - shame. Orderinchaos 17:35, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
- I know, my first vandalism warning! Yes, thanks for the tips (and the CD), I was using the documents to do some double-checking last night. I find Tasmania's parliamentary library also has great online data. --Canley (talk) 04:17, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| Such speedy updates to the senators' articles and tons of good work in general that deserves a nod. Cheers! Donama (talk) 03:13, 1 July 2011 (UTC) |
Melbourne meetup this Saturday
[edit]|
|
Melbourne Meetup
|
| |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:00, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)
Future of WikiProject Association Football in Australia
[edit]There is a discussion on the future direction of WikiProject Association Football in Australia. To view the discussion see here. You have received this message because you are listed as a member of the WikiProject. Hack (talk) 06:12, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
[edit]
|
Hello Canley! I hope you accept this brownie as an amicable greeting from a fellow Wikipedian, SwisterTwister talk 04:39, 25 August 2011 (UTC) |
- Why thank you! :) --Canley (talk) 05:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
WP Australian Politics in the Signpost
[edit]"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Australian Politics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:37, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
|
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| In recognition of your efforts at Burrunan dolphin. A lot of people will be interested in the subject right now, and having a decent article is a good thing. J Milburn (talk) 21:34, 15 September 2011 (UTC) |
Hello
[edit]Hi Canley, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Director-General of the Australian Secret Intelligence Service--It would be great if you could also upload a picture for the related article Director-General of Security. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jipinghe (talk • contribs) 21:47, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Hello, misleading newspaper articles have caused you to get your article a bit wrong. The dolphins are found along parts of coast of SA, Vic and Tas. (the type specimen for the species is from the Esk in Tas)- see the paper in the external link. Thought I would leave this to you as there may be better articles to use as reference, not sure the link should be a ref. (though I did dig up a pic). Regards (Crusoe8181 (talk) 07:04, 16 September 2011 (UTC)).
- Hi Canley. Nice work on the article and you thoroughly deserve the above barnstar. You might be interested to know that the article has been proposed for ITN at WP:ITN/C. This is basically unrelated to Crusoe's comment, but didn't see the need to start a new section. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 13:58, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Burrunan dolphin
[edit] | On 19 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Burrunan dolphin, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Burrunan dolphin is only the third new dolphin species to be recognized since the late 19th century? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Burrunan dolphin.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Canley/Archive 2008–2012! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
Corrections
[edit]
|
Fanny Brownbill Award |
| Thanks for cleaning up the reference list. You're a champ. Niccastleman (talk) 00:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC) |
Discussion
[edit]Hi there, please help reach consensus by weighing in your opinion here. Thanks! Oz talk 00:29, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
Ocean Beach Tas
[edit]Thanks for the cleanup - but please note what got lost for a bit - cheers http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ocean_Beach_(Tasmania)&oldid=460369515 SatuSuro 23:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
- dont apologise - have a good christmas - things happen SatuSuro 08:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
I addressed your concern and sorry it was my mistake. Will you please take a look again? — Legolas (talk2me) 09:51, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
DYK for BIGOT list
[edit] | On 11 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article BIGOT list, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a junior officer on the USS Ancon refused King George VI entry to the ship's intelligence centre because no-one told him the King "was a Bigot"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/BIGOT list.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Harold Hopkins
[edit]Hi, nice work on the Harold Hopkins article. Very responsive to his sad death. Regards, WWGB (talk) 08:53, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I was surprised there wasn't an article on him! --Canley (talk) 10:45, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Four Square Laundry
[edit] | On 11 December 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Four Square Laundry, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Four Square Laundry in Belfast was a front company for a British Army intelligence unit? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Four Square Laundry.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:05, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Rice-interview with vampire.png
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rice-interview with vampire.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 12:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Cilla McQueen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Midlands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
DYK for New Zealand Poet Laureate
[edit] | On 8 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Zealand Poet Laureate, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that until 2007, the New Zealand Poet Laureate was not appointed by the New Zealand government, but by Te Mata Estates, a commercial winery? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/New Zealand Poet Laureate.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 08:03, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
[edit]Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Michael Petroni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Jerry Zucker and Till Human Voices Wake Us (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Marthe Cnockaert
[edit] | On 25 January 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marthe Cnockaert, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that during World War I, Marthe Cnockaert was recruited as a spy by both Germany and Britain, and she arranged for her German recruiter to be killed? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Marthe Cnockaert.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 00:03, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- That was fantastic. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 04:11, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
One question...
[edit]Hi,
It's 12:10 AM in Nevada and I am contributing to Wikipedia. Why did you remove the Season 3 section from the page "List of In the Night Garden episodes"? Was it outdated? I restored it after a few months and it was never removed again. Answer if you can.
68.224.119.202 (talk) 08:09, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
[edit]
| |||
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
MSU Interview
[edit]Dear Canley,
My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, were it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.
So a few things about the interviews:
- Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
- Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
- All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
- All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
- The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.
Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.
If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.
Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
February Melbourne Meetup
[edit]Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Oops, it looks like we had a delete conflict on the article. I didn't realize that you had restored your deletion, so I've re-restored it. Sorry for the confusion! —DoRD (talk) 03:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problem at all. --Canley (talk) 04:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
|
The Epic Barnstar | |
| Thanks for creating the new article Members of the Victorian Legislative Assembly, 1924–1927 and working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australian history. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Members of the Victorian Legislative Assembly, 1924–1927, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Holland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 7
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited MacFarlan Ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Everard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Category:Old Clongownians
[edit]Category:Old Clongownians, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Melbourne meetup
[edit]Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 03:47, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
Vince Lovegrove
[edit]Thanks for the full birth date and such a good ref at Vince Lovegrove. I'd been looking for such a source but hadn't found one yet. I've also used it to add some info to his personal life. Good onya.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- 1947 or 1948? Baker has 1948, Grossman says he just had his 64th birthday (hence 1948) but SMH says 1947. 1947 also at The Australian obit. What do you think?shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:30, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
- 1947 wins. See Trove search result.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:55, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
Trad
[edit]Just out of interest, where did you find Jackie Trad's birthdate? I did a run-through of the people we're missing the other day and hers was one of the ones I couldn't find anywhere. Frickeg (talk) 05:22, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, no, leave it, I'd say. I kind of think we have to start using Facebook and Twitter and stuff in some circumstances (as long as they're official, of course), and this seems the perfect sort of thing. It should go up on the Queensland Parliament site in a month or two anyway. (I confess I was kind of hoping you had access to some sort of super-source for this kind of thing - Antony Green, for example, magically knows everyone's ages even where I spend hours combing the internet and come up with nothing, but I imagine he has special resources. At least his ages give us approximate years.) Frickeg (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Nan Chauncy.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nan Chauncy.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Fascinating! I don't suppose you happen to know of other state or federal seats that have been won by the conservatives on the back of communist preferences? Timeshift (talk) 07:03, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- I know, I had to double check, thinking "that can't be right"! I want to expand on that aspect of it, there were a few articles on Trove about it. Not aware of any others at this stage... --Canley (talk) 11:17, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- If I may intrude, I don't think there's ever been such a strong flow of preferences between any two candidates that would overturn a 49.58% primary vote. The most famous instance of this, of course, is Moreton in 1961, the seat that supposedly decided that election, in which 93 Communist preferences infamously decided the outcome in the Libs' favour. (On the other hand, those Communist preferences split almost 50-50, which must be pretty unusual. I suspect the donkey vote might be the culprit.) Frickeg (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- There's an interesting statistical analysis of the Geelong results here. --Canley (talk) 12:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Frickeg, I clearly recognise that. However, today's media say that Labor get elected on the back of Green preferences and too often refer to the primary vote. Technically, if in a three cornered contest the conservatives get elected with less than 50 percent of the primary vote and the third party was the communists, they did get elected on their preferences on the TCP. Thanks for the advice about Moreton, I was under the impression that it was the DLP's preferences that got them over the line... this by-election is a nice stark three-cornered Labor-conservative-communist contest which saw the conservatives only reach a majority after third-place communist votes were redistributed. Timeshift (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I thought so, Timeshift, just clarifying. (In Moreton, 100% of QLP preferences would have delivered the Libs the seat, but some of their preferences leaked too, bringing the exact split of Communist preferences into play.) Canley, that analysis is interesting. I suppose the donkey vote was a thing back then, though? It seems to explain matters pretty self-evidently to me, but then I am not a statistician. Frickeg (talk) 13:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Considering the above, I think it is suitable to start removing from wiki articles that the DLP saw Menzies win in 1961 and more generally. It would seem to be an unsupportable myth. Timeshift (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Well, no, it is true, and Moreton would never have been won without QLP preferences. The DLP's preferences did flow very strongly to the Coalition - their voters were well-known as the most biddable of all in this regard. And their preferences did help the Coalition win seats they would never have won if DLP voters had stayed with Labor, where the vast majority (at least in the early days) of them came from. (Perhaps we should discuss this further at WT:AUP?) Frickeg (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Considering the above, I think it is suitable to start removing from wiki articles that the DLP saw Menzies win in 1961 and more generally. It would seem to be an unsupportable myth. Timeshift (talk) 22:48, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I thought so, Timeshift, just clarifying. (In Moreton, 100% of QLP preferences would have delivered the Libs the seat, but some of their preferences leaked too, bringing the exact split of Communist preferences into play.) Canley, that analysis is interesting. I suppose the donkey vote was a thing back then, though? It seems to explain matters pretty self-evidently to me, but then I am not a statistician. Frickeg (talk) 13:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- If I may intrude, I don't think there's ever been such a strong flow of preferences between any two candidates that would overturn a 49.58% primary vote. The most famous instance of this, of course, is Moreton in 1961, the seat that supposedly decided that election, in which 93 Communist preferences infamously decided the outcome in the Libs' favour. (On the other hand, those Communist preferences split almost 50-50, which must be pretty unusual. I suspect the donkey vote might be the culprit.) Frickeg (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Eden George
[edit] | On 22 May 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Eden George, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Aaron Ayers, Henry Thomson, and Eden George all unsuccessfully contested the Christchurch South election in the 1887 election and were at some point Mayors of Christchurch? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Vinton Smith
[edit]Just noticed your edits at Members of the Victorian Legislative Assembly, 1935–1937 regarding Vinton Smith. According to his WWI service records[3], his name was "SMITH, James Taylor Vinton" and his parents were simply known as Smith - Thomas L H Smith[4] and Minerva Mary Smith (nee Daniel). I notice that The Age referred to him as Mr Vinton Smith as it were a surname [5], is it possible that he changed his name at some point? Hack (talk) 05:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hi; just on a related point, it was not unheard of for someone to go by the double surname even if their legal name was single. James Hume Cook and William Laird Smith are two federal examples: their legal names were Cook and Smith, but they both went by Hume Cook and Laird Smith as surnames throughout their careers (possibly because they're such common names). Vinton Smith may have been the same. Frickeg (talk) 07:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Charles Kingsford Smith would probably be the most notable example of this. Looking a bit further at Vinton Smith, it seems that a stockbroking firm, Vinton Smith, Dougall & Co. bore his name (incidentally one of the firm's senior employees Jim Burke, former Australia cricketer, shared his cause of death). Hack (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks guys, that's what I suspected—the Vinton seems to have been used to distinguish a common surname. I think I will keep the article sorted as under Smith but keep the references to Vinton Smith in the article as it seems that was his commonly used name. --Canley (talk) 10:43, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
- Charles Kingsford Smith would probably be the most notable example of this. Looking a bit further at Vinton Smith, it seems that a stockbroking firm, Vinton Smith, Dougall & Co. bore his name (incidentally one of the firm's senior employees Jim Burke, former Australia cricketer, shared his cause of death). Hack (talk) 08:39, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Shrimp on the barbie.ogg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Shrimp on the barbie.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:59, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
haha
[edit]was in a hurry forgot which link was correct - aging brain - the signs thereof - thanks for correction - SatuSuro 01:14, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Wacky waiters.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Wacky waiters.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1932 in Australia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Jack Lang
- Victorian state election, 1932 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electoral district of Richmond
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:36, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Peter Finn
[edit] | On 7 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Peter Finn, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Peter Finn considered contesting the Wakatipu electorate in the 1879 New Zealand general election, but he let his brother Hugh run instead, who was successful? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Could you please restore the old history of this article that you deleted when you made way for the move of Good Luck Charlie characters (TV series) over to this location. There was some old versions of previous split actions that would be useful to reference if this article ever does get consensus to split. Thanks. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:25, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 02:18, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Victorian state election, 1929, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter West (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:34, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Tony Scott's wife
[edit]You are correct that the Telegraph calls her "Staunton" in the obit, but they call her Sanders here. So who do we believe? The Telegraph or The Telegraph? InedibleHulk (talk) 09:39, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
- Responded on my page. InedibleHulk (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Electoral division of Brennan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Chandler (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Francis Maralampuwi Xavier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bathurst Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
auto tag
[edit]fyi... on talk pages such as Talk:Max Bingham, you don't need to add |auto=yes. This is only added by bots and since you are not a bot (or are you? Skynet, is that you again?), you don't need to add it. You are one of the few crazy people who actually adds tags to the talk pages, thank you for that. It makes my life easier, if I didn't have a wife. Wife means no life. Bgwhite (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- No, not a bot or Skynet! I must have just copied the tags from another page which were auto applied. --Canley (talk) 06:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Gary Higgins (politician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Rob Knight
- Max Bingham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Angus Bethune
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre
[edit] An article that you have been involved in editing, Metropolitan Remand and Reception Centre , has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rangasyd (talk) 06:14, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi there. I'm pinging you as an active Australian editor who I know is pretty experienced. There's stuff going on at Australian Christian Lobby and talk page that could use some attention. I don't have the energy for full-blown participation but thought perhaps a range of experienced editors could help sort it out as a team. Regards, hamiltonstone (talk) 23:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
By-elections
[edit]Thanks for catching those errors! What source are you using for the earlier parliaments? I had to stop when our articles ran out. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:53, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
- How far does your Excel document go back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Drover's Wife (talk • contribs) 04:51, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Victorian state election, 1952
[edit]Can you recheck the numbers for Victorian state election, 1952? Some of the figures don't match up with the UWA source. The Liberal result is from 1950, but some of the other numbers (turnout percentage, swings) are off by ~0.01% and it's not obvious why. Miracle Pen (talk) 15:04, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like a rounding error in the source book. I've been generally using the Hughes Handbook of Australian Governments and Politics as the reference as it is the source for most of the UWA data anyway and has a bit more detail. Looking at the book, the percentages in the table match those in the article, but UWA seem to have calculated the percentages and swings directly from the voting figures. Additionally, I calculated the swing by subtracting one election's (rounded) vote percentage in the book from the previous one, so that could introduce rounding errors in some cases as well. For the Liberal and Country Party in 1952, Hughes has [255685/1028680 = 24.85%] whereas UWA (and an Excel spreadsheet) say [255685/1028680 = 24.86%]. To four decimal places, the percentage is 24.8566, so I wonder if the Hughes book is truncating to 2 decimal places rather than rounding up, or if it's a typo. I'll have a look at a few more discrepancies to see if that's the case. And I have fixed the 1950 Liberal figure in the 1952 article, thanks for spotting it! --Canley (talk) 22:28, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
- I've compared a few more election results, and as I suspected, it looks like the Hughes book truncates or rounds down a 0.005 decimal rather than rounding up. An example, the Communist vote in the 1955 election: [4589/1289979 = 0.3557%] - Hughes has this as "0.35", UWA doesn't list the Communist vote though, including it in "Other" but I suspect they would have entered the votes into their database and it would have calculated the percentage by rounding up to "0.36", as seems to have happened several times in the 1952 entry. Canley (talk) 22:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
- So that's what's happening! Thanks for straightening it out - it might be worth raising at WT:AUP, there could be any number of articles with these problems. (I wonder why an academic would have problems rounding properly?) Anyway, have a good Christmas! Miracle Pen (talk) 14:33, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
- I've compared a few more election results, and as I suspected, it looks like the Hughes book truncates or rounds down a 0.005 decimal rather than rounding up. An example, the Communist vote in the 1955 election: [4589/1289979 = 0.3557%] - Hughes has this as "0.35", UWA doesn't list the Communist vote though, including it in "Other" but I suspect they would have entered the votes into their database and it would have calculated the percentage by rounding up to "0.36", as seems to have happened several times in the 1952 entry. Canley (talk) 22:58, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
[edit] | Next: 6 January 2013 at La Trobe City Campus |
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 05:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)