User talk:Smith609

	; Archives
	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
	/DOI bot

This user is not currently active on Wikipedia. Smith609 has not edited Wikipedia since 9 January 2024. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

This user rarely has the opportunity to spend time on Wikipedia, so may not respond immediately to comments posted here, and is unlikely to see comments posted elsewhere. If urgent input is required, try e-mailing.

Please note: to avoid duplication, I'll reply to queries on this page.

How to propose images to the author of a wiki for evalutation?

I have some good images ×10 of lichenns that I captured on my olive trees today but I don't know how to propose them.to the author. I found your name at the beginning of lichens article. Ivanmellace (talk) 21:13, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cambrian explosion calling card

Template:Cambrian explosion calling card has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:32, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Period infoboxes

Template:Period infoboxes has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:04, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Taxobot

Hi,

Around 10 years ago, you created Taxobot and registered it on Toolforge. It appears to be inactive.

In 2021, Taxobot was created on the French Wikipedia (Github). We would like to attempt deploying that tool on Toolforge under its original name. Since your Taxobot is still registered, albeit inactive, would you be open to rename / delete it on Toolforge to free up the URL for this project?

Thank you. LD (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AA Dragons for you.

🐲🐉 GinnyThomas (talk) 22:45, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Running Citation bot on MDWiki.org

Wondering if you would be willing to run the citation bot on MDWiki.org? Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:50, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creating User:Citation bot 48JcL48 (talk) (contribs) 00:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Echinoderm phylogeny

Template:Echinoderm phylogeny has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sub-biota graphical timeline

Template:Sub-biota graphical timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic

Hello! I reverted you recent edit to Gelman-Rubin statistic. Your edit was badly formatted, and unencyclopedic. If you feel the given formula is incorrect, I encourage you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 06:36, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the talk page already indicates that the forumla is incorrect. I've restored the edit in a more "encyclopaedic" format – if you feel you can improve the formatting, do please feel free to do so, but I think it's worth keeping the reference in there as in my view, it's better to have badly formatted but correct information than formulae that are perfectly formatted but with no indication that they are misleading! Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 09:45, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your Bot made a misleading and factually erroneous assertion at the top of a Wikipedia article.

In the Wikipedia article about JAMES ROSEN (author), your bot claimed: "This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources." This is factually false. Only four of 24 footnoted sources are primary sources; the other 20 footnoted sources are secondary or tertiary sources, as the bot requests. This claim also is nonsensical because primary sources are the gold standard in all biographical or autobiographical work. Blueboy567 (talk) 23:47, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blueboy567, that template was added in this edit, not by a bot. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:00, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics

Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Palaeontology/Articles by quality statistics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Assessment row

Template:Assessment row has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 14:45, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Assessment totals

Template:Assessment totals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Citation bot for mk.wiki

Hello Smith. I am a bureaucrat on mk.wiki and a fellow editor suggested that I should ask you whether the Wikipedia citation bot can be used for our wiki (i.e. whether mk.wiki can be included in the "Wiki to run on". We invariably use English parameters in all our citation templates and we are wondering if we can make use of this excellent tool, if our wiki is enabled for it. Thanks a lot! B. Jankuloski (talk) 11:30, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Xenusia" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Xenusia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 5 § Xenusia until a consensus is reached. IC1101-Capinatator (talk) 15:11, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is amazing. Citation Bot

Tremendous. Outstanding. 2800:BF0:155:E19:D75:1D68:E8FE:562A (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]