User talk:Célestin Denis

This is Célestin Denis's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

An aside

By the way, I think you do some very valuable work here. Hip hop coverage is very underdone, so we need more younger editors (most are old men who edit about history)^[Humor]. Sad Frosty will get deleted. Don't let that discourage you: most editors here have had an article or two deleted. I have one. It happens to be the best of us. —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it a lot. It's been so frustrating trying to create articles for rappers without them being deleted. I've spent so many times trying to make one for Ken Carson and Destroy Lonely. Célestin Denis (talk) 00:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ken Carson is notable, and you're making good progress! So that seems likely to work out well. Hopefully Destroy Lonely goes over well too. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me. I actually work in this topic a lot, so I can give you good insight =P —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:30, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think the draft for Ken Carson would be ready to be moved in mainspace? Célestin Denis (talk) 00:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'll move it when you remove the other draft you pasted to the bottom. BTW, you're not supposed to do that without crediting the author. —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:38, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Someone just added the draft someone put at Draft:Ken Car$on for me to merge with the other draft article which I did. I kept the verifiable information and left the other. Célestin Denis (talk) 00:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I moved it to the mainspace; btw, if you add 100 more letters to the article, there may be something cooler you can do with it —VersaceSpace 🌃 00:47, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ik I might be annoying, but I was wondering if you thought SSGKobe, Lancey Foux and BabyTron would be ready for the mainspace. Célestin Denis (talk) 01:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're not annoying. I'd rather you asked me than receive proverbial lashings from an admin. I'll look through them and comment as I see fit. —VersaceSpace 🌃 02:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I second what VS said above. The first ever article I wrote on this encyclopedia was declined as being a hagiography rather than a biography. My two cents are that one needs to understand both the general notability criteria and the subjective one very deeply understanding pech-o-KHam (twists and turns) of the both completely. Several articles that merit deletion can be made survive through subjective criteria if argued correctly. Deletion discussions are more about better and reasonable arguments in my opinion than anything else. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly agree. Mooonswimmer 19:45, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions are highly appreciated.—Alalch E. 17:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SSGKobe has been accepted

SSGKobe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—VersaceSpace 🌃 14:10, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Lancey Foux has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Lancey Foux. Thanks! —VersaceSpace 🌃 14:13, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed the ref 23 Célestin Denis (talk) 17:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BabyTron has been accepted

BabyTron, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—VersaceSpace 🌃 14:15, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lancey Foux has been accepted

Lancey Foux, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—VersaceSpace 🌃 11:48, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ken's age

Multiple people have vandalized Ken's page, claiming he was born in 2002 instead of his legally confirmed birth date of 2000. I added a note to the beginning of the article and posted about it on his talk page. As you are the person who created the article, I thought you should know.

Also, thank you for what you are doing on Wiki. As a hip-hop producer, it hurts to see popular rappers with notability get removed from the site. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 17:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IShowSpeed (October 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: * See talk page discussion.

The draft was moved into mainspace, moved back, and then c&p recreated in mainspace where it is currently speedy tagged. The draft history shows a long problematic history with eight declines and one rejection, plus two AfD discussions, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IShowSpeed (ended as "draftify" in March 2022) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IShowSpeed (2nd nomination) (ended as "delete" in April 2022).

There's a plethora of unreliable sources such as Sportskeeda and Lifehacker, as well as Spotify and Youtube links used inappropriately as references.

bonadea contributions talk 09:11, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:IShowSpeed has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:IShowSpeed. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:45, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with drafts

I created drafts for rappers Kura and K Suave and would like your help expanding the articles, as they are pretty barebones right now. Thanks if possible. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 18:43, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kura might have difficulty passing notability requirements, however K Suave should work easily. I'll see what I can do Célestin Denis (talk) 23:22, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Also created a draft for rapper Rarri Dream that I would like your help on expanding if possible Blakegrant1 (talk) 11:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YSL case

I just created a draft for the YSL case, and I hope you can help expand the article. Major case involving serious accusations and major people in the hip-hop industry. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 16:21, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This article would likely end up being merged in the YSL Records Wikipedia. Might be worth the shot tho. Célestin Denis (talk) 16:57, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it might be worth its own article, given that 6ix9ine has an article for his own trial, which had less defendants and smaller charges. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 17:01, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the indictment so that information can be more accurate.[1] ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 17:02, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summrs moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Summrs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:00, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summrs meets WP:MUSICBIO per 1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself. He has received coverage in Pitchfork which is a reliable music publication, alongside other publications such as Lyrical Lemonade. There's plenty of passing mentions of him and other coverage including a mention in a Washington Post article. Number 7. Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city; note that the subject must still meet all ordinary Wikipedia standards, including verifiability.

could also be argued considering Summrs' massive influence on pluggnb as a style. Célestin Denis (talk) 22:14, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Summrs, Autumn!, Yeat and Kankan are all extremely influential and prominent figures of pluggnb as a genre. Célestin Denis (talk) 22:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Took a look at the draft, here's my interpretation of the sources:

Source 1: Database that does not give any info about artist
Sources 2, 4, and 13, 15: About musical work, not really about artist themselves
Source 3: Interview, can be good
Source 10: Trivial and not independent (10kProjects is his label, has no information and only has a YouTube video)
Sources 5, 7, 11, 12, 14, 16: Trivial mentions
Sources 6 and 8: Small articles on songs, not about artists themselves
Source 9: List, sort of trivial

Note that passing mentions are not good enough for sources. Honestly, as an editor, I can't see why it meets WP:MUSICBIO. reppop^talk 22:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

His notability per WP:MUSICBIO comes more with the massive influence he had on pluggnb and his role as one of the most prominent figure of the genre. I will try to source this particular influence. It doesn't help that Summrs as an artist is constantly trying to distance himself from the mainstream and has declined interviews from XXL in the past. He recently signed to 10K Projects and has a song releasing with Trippie Redd soon. I assume more coverage should appear very soon and I will continue to improve the draft in the mean time. I understand he might not be ready for main-space yet. Célestin Denis (talk) 01:58, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If his past albums get re-released under 10K Projects as part of his record deal, I assume he should pass criteria 5. Célestin Denis (talk) 02:01, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be about Summrs? If not, then I still don't think he's notable. 10K Projects is also not an major record label or an important indie label (it's not the big three nor is it an old indie label, since it's only 7 years old). There also needs to be articles that aren't interviews that are still about him. His influence on pluggnb isn't notable either IMO, it's not even its own article and he's only a footnote on the history on the Plugg article. reppop^talk 19:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help with Project X

I made an article for Ken's album Project X, and would like help with sourcing. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 17:46, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:SypherPK icon.svg

Hello. I was curious as to how you attained File:SypherPK icon.svg. The source mentioned is https://www.youtube.com/c/SypherPK, but I can't seem to find the file in that format there (I can only find bitmap images). Is there a clever way you found the SVG file from the YouTube page? – Pbrks ^(t • c) 16:55, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I downloaded the image as jpeg from his YouTube channel, reduced the size and vectorized the image with Adobe. I don't know if that was the right procedure but I thought the .svg format was more appropriate as it is the format used for other YouTube channel logos on Wikipedia. Célestin Denis (talk) 16:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see (I didn't read the file page description all the way!). Please note that per WP:NFC, users are not permitted to vectorize non-free images, such as the logo mentioned above, and only official non-free vector logos should be used. If you would, please upload either an official vector logo if you can find one (I couldn't), or remove the image from the article (and preferably, tag it with {{Db-g7}}). Of course, you can replace the logo with the logo found at his YouTube page [2]. Thanks! – Pbrks ^(t • c) 17:02, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Célestin Denis, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~Swarm~ ^{sting} 01:33, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 09:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Pop Music Barnstar
		For bold, substantial edits dealing with contemporary hip-hop music. Marisauna (talk) 05:20, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

UK chart on Draft:IShowSpeed

Hi. I noticed that you added the UK chart to Draft:IShowSpeed. What you have cited here is the midweek UK Singles Chart and not the final one for the week, as you might be able to tell by the "singles-chart-update" being in the URL [3] (the final UK Singles Chart has "singles-chart" in the URL [4]). We don't use the midweek UK charts in chart tables, only ever really in prose to say that "x artist was at y position midweek". Please be sure of the correct chart you're adding, as passing this off as the overall UK chart for the week is disingenuous to readers. Thanks. Ss112 00:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake on my end, my apologies. I do notice that in the new link IShowSpeed's song World Cup is currently charted at number 54. Could I use that in the table? Célestin Denis (talk) 00:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you're right. I hadn't even looked to see if it was on the final chart. I'm so used to thinking midweek UK chart peaks are best-case-scenario data that I immediately think half of the songs or albums lower than the top 40 won't even make it anywhere near where they were midweek, but IShowSpeed's song actually ended up better. I've added it to the article. Ss112 01:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Quackity for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quackity, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quackity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EAS7

Hello, Célestin Denis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EAS7".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: IShowSpeed has been accepted

IShowSpeed, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 00:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats Célestin! I know this was a hard one. —VersaceSpace (talk) 00:58, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I'm glad the journey towards acceptance is finally over. Célestin Denis (talk) 01:02, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 12th Streamy Awards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ludwig.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lil Snupe has been accepted

Lil Snupe, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

UtherSRG (talk) 15:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Big Scarr

On 29 December 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Big Scarr, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 19:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Summrs (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Mere mentions, unreliable sources, and routine listings do nothing for notability. generally musicians need a Grammy nomination, a chart appearance, or a gold record.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Summrs and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Célestin Denis! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chris Troutman (talk) 03:26, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speaker Knockerz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speaker Knockerz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speaker Knockerz (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 06:33, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Speaker Knockerz.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Speaker Knockerz.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating templates when the artist has less than five articles to link to

Hello. I see several days ago you made Template:Ice Spice. Please see WP:NENAN and the informal "rule of five". Unless the artist has at least five articles to link to, they probably do not need a template made for them. Ice Spice currently only has four links in that template. The discography link is just a section of her main article so I think you were a bit premature in making this. Please bear this in mind going forward. Thanks. Ss112 08:13, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am about to create the "In Ha Mood" article which would make the article count 5. I might have created the template prematurely, I apologize. Célestin Denis (talk) 18:16, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Speaker Knockerz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Speaker Knockerz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Speaker Knockerz (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 22:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My sincere apology for irrational AfD

I just wanted to write this to tell my deepest apology for a two-week gap within both AfDs involving Speaker Knockerz (noms. #2 and 3). It was just that the second nomination was ineligible due to a speedy delete without consensus. It seems why I have to nominate it again for the third time without reviewing the last votes. I hope you understand. Darrion "Beans" Brown 🙂 (my talk page / my sandbox) 03:48, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Do not move articles anywhere while a move discussion is open

Take notice of the page move discussion template at the top of the article in future, please, considering you added it to my move discussion (which usually should not be done anyway—you should not edit somebody else's move request[s]). You can "correct" the capitalisation once the discussion has concluded and/or the page is moved. Also in case you were going to, do not go and "correct" the capitalisation in the move discussion formatting. Thank you. Ss112 06:29, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Célestin Denis (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keed Talk To Em' 2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keed Talk To Em' 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Bob Lee (businessman)

On 8 April 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Bob Lee (businessman), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Thriley (talk) 14:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lil Uzi Vert

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lil Uzi Vert you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 01:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lil Uzi Vert

The article Lil Uzi Vert you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lil Uzi Vert and Talk:Lil Uzi Vert/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Salut. Just a heads up that I will be out of town from now through the end of the weekend, and I will be unable to respond to GA inquiries until then. I trust that you will fix the issues in due time, and wish you the best of luck.

dannymusiceditor ^oops 16:45, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Summrs

Hello, Célestin Denis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Summrs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:03, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Need to make changes the Lil Uzi Vert article now

Hey mate, I'm noticing you haven't made any changes to the Lil Uzi Vert article, after a week after the GA review is done. You really need to get some changes that Danny wanted you to do done, so that your first nomination will be a pass. Good luck! — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 08:46, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Lil Uzi Vert

The article Lil Uzi Vert you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lil Uzi Vert for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DannyMusicEditor -- DannyMusicEditor (talk) 23:43, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A personal note from me in addition to the automated one above. I am aware you are quite busy currently, and just closed this so it would not wait indefinitely. I just wanted to remind you that if you finish it within the next few months, I am still here to review it when you're finished fixing it up, and I encourage you to reach out to me when you do. I would love to see this pass, I just can't keep it open forever. dannymusiceditor ^oops 23:59, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pat Stay

Hello, Célestin Denis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pat Stay, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DD Osama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DD Osama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DD Osama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:02, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lucki

Template:Lucki has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. DaCrashy (talk) 00:09, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Xaviersobased

A tag has been placed on Xaviersobased requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

A7 (musician), Fails WP:GNG and only has 10 search results for news

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Zinnober9 (talk) 04:03, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Twomad for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Twomad is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twomad until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Picard's Facepalm • ^{Made It So} _Engage! • 21:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Twomad moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Twomad, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smokingskul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smokingskul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smokingskul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Authenyo (talk) 14:35, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pat Stay

Hello, Célestin Denis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pat Stay".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:41, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Xaviersobased for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xaviersobased is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Xaviersobased until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 01:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Hey Célestin, I'm really interested in Izaya Tiji's music. I suggest that you could make an article about him in the future. He really make good music fr TijiIzaya (talk) 03:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EvilJ0rdan

Hello, Célestin Denis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EvilJ0rdan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lazerdim twitter

Did you hack it or is someone pretending to be you? I recognized your face as the pfp Ja Morant fan (talk) 16:43, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EvilJ0rdan

Hello, Célestin Denis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "EvilJ0rdan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:I Am Music.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Am Music.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jaydes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jaydes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaydes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]