User talk:ColorTheoryRGB

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

June 2019

Your recent editing history at Template:Odd Future shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
After being unblocked, one would think you'd honestly tread more carefully. User:Drmies, this user is still edit warring over album titles. Ss112 03:06, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I posted to your talk page. Anyhoo, I made the edit on Template:Odd Future for the exact reason I wrote about on the affecting page's talk page. If you don't know what I mean, just check for "Future & Juice Wrld Present... Wrld on Drugs" on Template:Future (rapper). See? That's because of WP:COMMONNAME. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 03:14, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Then I'm sorry for the warning, as I thought you were just going back to what you did a week or so ago, but in future, please provide an explanation for your reverts. Not every user has time to check each talk page. Ss112 03:16, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"..in future..." "..in future..." "..in future..." ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 03:17, 12 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, truly a comic genius reply. Ss112 04:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nu-crunk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nu-crunk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 03:13, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nu-crunk (June 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need more secondary sources to show this is a notable term besides one used by a non-notable YouTuber.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nu-crunk and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nu-crunk, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 05:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Lil Nas X. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Young Nudy. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:24, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Lost Boy (album) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Lost Boy (album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 20:01, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Without Me (Halsey song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vibe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:05, 18 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

HBS (Lil Keed song)

How does this song meet the notability guidelines? There is nothing there that comes close to that. Number of streams on spotify is not significant. Did it place in any countries charts? Without that it just does not qualify for an entry here. noq (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Nu-crunk concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nu-crunk, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jetsonmade (December 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

per WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jetsonmade and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jetsonmade, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:30, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Nu-crunk

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nu-crunk".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 06:00, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Box (Roddy Ricch song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. For a user who's been blocked for the crap you pulled half a year ago, I would think you'd know better than to add unsourced material. Apparently not. Ss112 04:14, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Audi RSQ e-tron moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Audi RSQ e-tron, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 06:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Black Balloons concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Black Balloons, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Black Balloons

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Black Balloons".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:23, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Astroworld (album), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 21:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, but just so you know, "Abyss" was the demo for "No Bystanders." It would be great if you could include that somewhere. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 22:12, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Even if "Abyss" was the demo for "No Bystanders", it's not credited on the album's liner notes and demos are not the same as samples. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:49, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Working on Dying moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Working on Dying, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hitro talk 08:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Hatchback (song)

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Hatchback (song), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatchback (song).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Meatsgains^(talk) 22:55, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hatchback (song)

The article Hatchback (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not yet notable per WP:NSONG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Captain Calm (talk) 17:32, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hatchback artwork.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hatchback artwork.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Working on Dying (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Buidhe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Working on Dying and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Working on Dying, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

(t · c) buidhe 02:48, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Working on Dying

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Working on Dying, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:03, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving your sandbox to nonexistent users' pages

Hello! On 8 November, I encountered the user pages User:ColorTheoryRGC, User:ColorTheoryRGD, User:ColorTheoryRGE, and User:ColorTheoryRGF. If I recall correctly, you created them or moved your sandbox or subpages of it to those titles. I just ran into the page User:ColorTheoryRGA, which you moved from your sandbox on 14 November. Please stop doing this. Pages for nonexistent users can be deleted under speedy deletion criterion U2. If you'd like to move it back to your sandbox, you can request it at WP:RM/TR. If you'd like to delete the page, you can request it by adding {{db-multiple|G7|U2}} to the top of the page. Thanks. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 15:25, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ken Carson (rapper)

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ken Carson (rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ken Carson (rapper)

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ken Carson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:16, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trial of YSL Records (January 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by TheChunky were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:REFBOMB and fix the article and add some reliable sources which covers the topic so that it can generate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Trial of YSL Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 05:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: K Suave has been accepted

K Suave, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 08:56, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Watch This" credits

I noticed your edits on the Watch This page and just wanted to add some info: crediting on the remix is tedious because nothing is available online, Tidal was the only place where I found anything, and even then it wasn't much: just Uzi as "vocals" and Arizonatears and Sped Up Nightcore as "remixers". Moreover, I don't think the single was released through Generation Now: Arizonatears' upload on YouTube only mentions Atlantic, while catalog listings of the single make no mention of GN. Wouldn't it be best if we wait until better sourcing comes out for these credits? Toyota Impreza (talk) 16:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to be honest, I'm pretty suspicious of this song's release, Toyota Impreza. Most uploads of the song on streaming services have no labels listed at all, "Sped Up Nightcore" is more of a descriptive term than a "remixer" (not even one that applies to the song!), and I feel that if the song would have required some changes in order to feel more "official" (mainly making sure the vocals were on-beat and on-key, which they aren't on the remix). The only reason I think it won't be taken down (and will probably become officially distributed by Atlantic and GN) is because it's charting now, and the labels will see it as profitable.

Also, YouTube Music lists the provider as Sped Up Nightcore, which could explain its presence in the song's credits. This definitively proves that Atlantic and GN don't distribute the song. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 16:58, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sped Up Nightcore is a Warner-ran profile on DSPs, every single one of their releases is from various Warner artists with sometimes Warner/various official distribution details left out on their releases (see here, here, where they're listed as "Unknown", and here). Furthermore, the song's ISRC entry is USAT22301358, a format that matches the rest of Uzi's catalog. It also has been getting really high placements on editorial playlists on platforms like Spotify's RapCaviar, so if it were to be unofficial, it's shocking to see they let it up. With all of this, I'm leaning more towards an official release, but with an extremely bizarre lack of info with it Toyota Impreza (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting to hear. Editing the article accordingly. ColorTheoryRGB CMYK 21:34, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kura (rapper)

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kura (rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kura (rapper)

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kura".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:16, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Trial of YSL Records

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Trial of YSL Records, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Trial of YSL Records

Hello, ColorTheoryRGB. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trial of YSL Records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:55, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]