User talk:Aledownload

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Aledownload. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! EurovisionNim (talk to me)(see my edits) 11:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - ^theWOLFchild 21:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of World War III (UFO)

The article World War III (UFO) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that this is "a thing." UFO (TV series) doesn't mention WW III, nor does sole reference on this page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of World War III (UFO)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as World War III (UFO), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Toddst1 (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gen. Gogol, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages From Russia with Love and Moonraker. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Space: 1999 vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Matter of Life and Death. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alfa Romeo emoticons

The article Alfa Romeo emoticons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Opencooper (talk) 02:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sith, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Star Wars: Clone Wars and Star Wars: The Clone Wars. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:29, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spacesuits in fiction, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interstellar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Space: 1999 vehicles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Last Enemy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Kleuske. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of artificial objects on the Moon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kleuske (talk) 11:14, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Space Commission for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Space Commission is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Space Commission until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 11:28, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your level of English

Since you wrote "Putted on the ground by David Scott" in List of artificial objects on the Moon, your level of English proficiency is not "near-native", therefore I have downgraded it one level to en-3 ("You are confident in writing in a language in an encyclopedic style, but may make minor mistakes, and have trouble with some of the most peculiar features of the language. You should probably only need a monolingual dictionary to understand any non-technical article." The levels are explained at Wikipedia:Babel/Levels.) Every native English speaker above the age of six must have been told by his parents that "put" is its own past tense, and there is no such word as "putted". In fact, I'm not sure that en-2 is not more appropriate, but I'll leave you to judge that.

Also, about your edit (I am not the user who reverted it): please note the introduction to the article explicitly says "The table below does not separately list small items such as ... the commemorative, artistic, and personal objects left there by Apollo astronauts, such as ... the Fallen Astronaut statuette and memorial plaque left by the crew of Apollo 15". Also, use of the Belgian flag was inappropriate, as the Belgian government had nothing to do with it. JustinTime55 (talk) 13:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lunar module (UFO): "...the Lunar module ... . It ~~have~~ has a maximum crew of two people..."

I have downgraded your English rating to en-2. En-3 is "confident in writing in a language in an encyclopedic style, but may make minor mistakes, and have trouble with some of the most peculiar features of the language." Basic grammar (singular vs. plural) is not a "peculiar feature" of English. (Please don't take this personally; the purpose of the userbox is to help other editors find people who can assist them with English, not to promote your ability.) JustinTime55 (talk) 13:20, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santa Maria, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Another Time, Another Place. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Comparison of UFO and Space: 1999

The article Comparison of UFO and Space: 1999 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, trivial, arbitrary comparison of two sci-fi programs, appears to violate original research or synthesis.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Animalparty! (talk) 19:00, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lunar Roving Vehicle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamonds Are Forever. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Star Wars TIE fighter variants

The article List of Star Wars TIE fighter variants has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This seems rife to grow into an indiscriminate list.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --EEMIV (talk) 20:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aledownload. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Trivia of Cars

The article Trivia of Cars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

random list of unsourced trivia - not appropriate to an encyclopaedia entry

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 13:08, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Imperial-type Star Wars states

The article List of Imperial-type Star Wars states has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-encyclopedic trivial information about a fictional subject. No out-of-universe perspective. Inclusion criteria is vague, presenting potential original research / PoV issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jellyman (talk) 14:10, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 30 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the ICarly universe and sister series page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help) and a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ranger (Interstellar) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranger (Interstellar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranger (Interstellar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 21:41, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to WikiProject YouTube

Hello! I, Jamesjpk (talk), would like to invite you to join WikiProject YouTube! We're working on:

Writing, cleaning up, and expanding articles about YouTube, in particular, these articles

Putting {{WikiProject YouTube}} on the talk pages of articles involving YouTube, and assessing articles with the template. This helps to categorize articles!

Sourcing BLP's affiliated with YouTube

Updating the project page, and spreading word about the project

and more!

It seems you might be interested, so please stop by! Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of ICarly universe and sister series

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ICarly universe and sister series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ICarly universe and sister series

The article ICarly universe and sister series has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This list of trivia is entirely original research. More appropriate for Wikia, e.g. http://zoey101.wikia.com/wiki/Dan_Schneider_universe that for Wikipedia

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Kusma (t·c) 19:02, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of periods in photo captions

Please take a moment to review our Manual Of Style for captions: MOS:CAPFRAG: "Most captions are not complete sentences, but merely sentence fragments, which should not end with a period." Only "if any complete sentence occurs in a caption, then all sentences, and any sentence fragments, in that caption should end with a period." That is not the case here. It was possible to easily correct the typo "Mmssion" without reverting. JustinTime55 (talk) 18:11, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ICarly universe and sister series for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ICarly universe and sister series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICarly universe and sister series until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ares program (The Martian)

The article Ares program (The Martian) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP is not a fansite - this article is a list of fictional launches contained in a book

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gbawden (talk) 11:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

World Space Commission

I've restored this article as a redirect. The consensus in 2016 was that the commission itself wasn't notable enough for an article, but that it worked as a reference to the show. It was redirected at that time. If you believe that the notability has changed, or if there are new references that might better show that notability, then you'll want to discuss the issue before restoring the article. You can discuss this at the talk page for Space:1999 (at Talk:Space: 1999 or at Redirects for Discussion. Please don't restore the article again without first discussing the matter. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 13:36, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the chess game is or is not notable doesn't matter - we have to look at World Space Commission on its own merits and see if it is notable. Are there sources that discuss it? References that discuss why it is important? If you want this to be an article, you have to articulate why it is notable now. If you can show that consensus has changed, you might convince enough other editors that an article is worth a shot. But until you've had that discussion, the previous AFD controls the status of the article, and that means it remains a redirect. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:18, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agena target vehicle

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Agena target vehicle a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to move this, then discuss it at Talk:Agena target vehicle first. I can see what you're trying to do, but WP policy has a real grump about Title Case in article titles. So you might have an uphill struggle to convince people.

If you do get agreement, then the way to do this is as a proper page move. If you can't (technical restrictions), and if there's support for doing it, then you can request a move by an admin at WP:RM/TR. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Horizontal-wheeled flying car

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Horizontal-wheeled flying car. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Flying car (aircraft). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Flying car (aircraft). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Power~enwiki (talk) 20:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Ares program (The Martian)

Hello, Aledownload,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Ares program (The Martian) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ares program (The Martian) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Sadads (talk) 03:07, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spacecraft named Pathfinder

Template:Spacecraft named Pathfinder has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 20:21, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Star Wars starfighters, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Star Wars: Clone Wars and Star Wars: The Clone Wars (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Aledownload. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Schneiderverse

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Schneiderverse requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:56, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hyperspace (science fiction), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Force field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Lego Star Wars sets

Hello, your edit here created a link to the disambiguation page 'Solo'. Solo of course can have many meanings not all of them to do with Star Wars. This error had already been corrected once, having come up via the Dab solver. It has now been corrected again. There is already a page for Solo: A Star Wars Story and it seems that is what you were wanting to link to. Furthermore, your edit was unexplained as you did not leave an edit summary. Cheers. Eagleash (talk) 18:08, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Armageddon (1998 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decompression (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to ANI noticeboard

You are invited to this section of the ANI noticeboard regarding the issue with the cast section of Armageddon. Thank you. BattleshipMan (talk) 03:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Bond, The Spy Who Loved Me, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Spy Who Loved Me (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

UFO (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to John Barry and The Man Who Came Back

Saint George and the Dragon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Moonbase Alpha

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, I'm DonQuixote. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D., but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFO (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D., without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. DonQuixote (talk) 17:23, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ptichka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Buran (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add easter egg links. See WP:EGG and WP:EASTEREGG. DonQuixote (talk) 16:26, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at An Unearthly Child shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. MarnetteD|Talk 16:59, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on History of the Daleks. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DonQuixote (talk) 14:11, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review identifying reliable sources. DonQuixote (talk) 17:15, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alfa Romeo 6C, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rally and Campo dei Fiori (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Silent Running, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dalek

Hello. The picture you are trying to add to Dalek isn't working. Please preview your edits before saving, that will allow you to make sure you've added the picture properly and that it won't show up as just a broken link. Thanks! --Yamla (talk) 12:32, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle droid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D.. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Sprite96 (talk) 21:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on The Doctor's Wife. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DonQuixote (talk) 12:28, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Title grammar - Daleks' Invasion Earth 2150 A.D.

Hiya, Aledownload. A reasonable period of time has passed for people to express there opinions about the title form for the article Daleks – Invasion Earth: 2150 A.D.. To progress this matter, you could now take this matter to WP:Requested moves for further discussion. Alternmatively, you could cut straight to the chase and use the process outlined at WP:Requested moves - Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves to get things going. For what it's worth, I believe you are right regarding this matter and would continue to support the change to Daleks' Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. . All the best. Sprite96 (talk) 16:19, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sole a catinelle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages French and Summer holiday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954 film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nuclear energy

Nautilus (Verne) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Nuclear energy

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1954 film). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:00, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join us for the Months of African Cinema in October!

Greetings!

You are receiving this message because your username or portal was listed as a participant of a WikiProject that is related to Africa, the Carribean, Cinema or theatre.

This is to introduce you to a new Wikiproject called AfroCine. This new project is dedicated to improving the Wikipedia coverage of the history, works, people, places, events, etc, that are associated with the cinema, theatre and arts of Africa, African countries, the carribbean, and the diaspora. If you would love to be part of this or you're already contributing in this area, kindly list your name as a participant on the project page here.

Furthermore, In the months of October and November, the WikiProject is organizing a global on-wiki contest and edit-a-thon tagged: The Months of African Cinema. If you would love to join us for this exciting event, also list your username as a participant for this event here. In preparation for the contest, please do suggest relevant articles that need to be created or expanded in different countries, during this event!

If you have any questions, complaints, suggestions, etc., please reach out to me personally on my talkpage! Cheers!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ed Straker, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and Harlington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Tempest (video game). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - FlightTime (open channel) 21:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You also added unsourced content to List of Google Easter eggs. I searched for, found and added an appropriate (enough for now) reference, but considering how simple it was for me to do it, I wonder why you didn't? Please carefully read the policies and guidelines regarding citations/references, notability and verifiability before continuing to add content to this encyclopedia; we don't need more unverified content; we need less! Don't get me wrong; I'm glad you're keen to improve the coverage, but if the content may be spurious, it's just noise. Quality above quantity please. Thanks. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 14:29, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Napoleon. - FlightTime (open channel) 14:35, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which has been dedicated to improving contents that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

This is a global online edit-a-thon, which is happening in at least 5 language editions of Wikipedia, including the English Wikipedia! Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section, if you haven't done so already.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing Users who are able to achieve the following:

Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Country Winners
Diversity winner
High quality contributors
Gender-gap fillers
Page improvers
Wikidata Translators

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 22:50, 03 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

Hello, I'm Kendall-K1. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kendall-K1 (talk) 19:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Lordtobi (✉) 18:42, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aledownload. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Aledownload. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lunar module (UFO) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lunar module (UFO) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunar module (UFO) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dicklyon (talk) 00:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lowercase used for Apollo modules

Please read Talk:Apollo command and service module#Requested move 26 November 2018. A consensus was reached not to use capital letters in the names of the Apollo modules, and notice how "Apollo Command/Service Module" was moved. I'm not sure I like it so much either, but we have to go with consensus. JustinTime55 (talk) 19:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Man in the High Castle (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dates in navboxes

Regarding this, I wanted to let you know that while WikiProject Television prefers dates in navigation templates, WikiProject Film does not. Thanks.— TAnthony^Talk 17:46, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2019 Reminder

Hi. I'm DannyS712 (talk), and I just wanted to remind you that you have signed up to compete in this year's WikiCup! There are about 2 weeks left before the first round ends – if you haven't yet made your first submission, there is still time to start; if you have already started, keep up the good work. See your submissions page: here. Good luck!

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFO (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Man Who Came Back (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited UFO (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Super 8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Confirm Involvement in WikiProject Disney

Hello Aledownload! I'm a new member of the Disney WikiProject. I'm trying to confirm who is still interested in the WikiProject in hopes to build a team of that can revamp the project. Please let me know if you would like to stay on the list of active members, or if I can go ahead and move to you the list of inactive members. You can do so by replying to this message and including the {{reply to|GeekInParadise}} tag. Happy editing! GeekInParadise (talk) 03:46, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes

@GeekInParadise:

Yes, I would like to stay.

April 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Palpatine. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Railfan23 (talk) 16:20, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Star Wars books, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kristin Lund (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

San Marino

Ho annullato la tua modifica alla pronuncia di San Marino; come vedi in questa pagina del Dizionario d'Ortografia e di Pronzunzia, la sequenza ⟨nm⟩ si pronuncia in maniera identica a ⟨mm⟩. Grazie e scusa il disturbo. イヴァンスクルージ九十八 _（会話） 11:20, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Don't add your own personal analysis

Please refrain from adding your own personal opinions and analysis to articles, as you recently did on List of Space: 1999 vehicles. This is not what Wikipedia is for. Additionally any claims on Wikipedia need to be supported by reliable sources, Original Research and supposition is not permitted on the project. You have been around the project long enough and editing enough to be aware of these, and in fact you've been explicitly told about this in the past. So please stop this kind of editing. Canterbury Tail talk 13:12, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again stop adding your own interpretations and analysis to articles, as you did in this edit. Such edits are considered disruptive. You've been around long enough to know that everything must be sourcable to reliable sources and not to add your own views. Again, stop this kind of editing. Canterbury Tail talk 17:36, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Star Wars, you may be blocked from editing. Railfan23 (talk) 13:27, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars. Railfan23 (talk) 13:37, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Dalek variants

The webiste Dalek 6388 has yet to be accepted as a reliable source. Perhaps it should be. If you want to continue citing it, I suggest you take the matter to the talk page for the main Wikipedia Dalek article, and attempt to build a consensus for this. Sprite96 (talk) 09:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

As you have been warned multiple times previously, you are not to add your own personal interpretations and analysis into Wikipedia articles or original research. You have continued this path, and had your edits reverted as per usual, most recently on Fernando (song). Due to your insistence on continually adding your own original research and analysis to the project, you have been blocked for a period of 24 hours. I encourage you after your block not to continue this pattern of editing and to use the talk pages of articles to suggest improvements if you think there is something missing. Canterbury Tail talk 01:08, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

I have blocked you yet again for your continuation of addition of unsourced material and your own personal analysis and original research, as in these edits. You need to stop with this editing pattern if you wish to continue editing on Wikipedia. You are quite aware of our policies and have been around for some time, but your editing is becoming increasingly disruptive. Canterbury Tail talk 13:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 13:30, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's NOT original research, that's an attempt to explain what happens at the end. It has also been accepted on Wikia, and it is also to introduce the character, which is far more featured in the film that what that plot says.

Decline reason:

Whether or not it has been accepted at Wikia is entirely irrelevant. If it is not original research, you will have no problem finding a citation meeting the criteria outlined in WP:RS to back up your statements. Please do so before editing further. Yamla (talk) 14:07, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also do not refactor other people's comments and signatures as you did in this edit. Completely not acceptable. Canterbury Tail talk 14:21, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, that was my phone's automatic corrector. Beg you pardon. Aledownload (talk) 16:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC).[reply]

August 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Monsters, Inc., you may be blocked from editing. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 16:22, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned multiple times about not adding your own interpretations and analysis and original research, you've been blocked twice recently, and then you do this edit. It's becoming clear that you're operating under I didn't hear that and your edits are verging towards deliberate disruption at this point. The amount of effort being made by other users to correct your edits is increasing and at this point I think we know how this will end up. If you don't correct your editing pattern you will end up being blocked again, and since the disruption seems to be becoming deliberate, you will likely end up with an indefinite block soon. I urge you to pay attention to what is being said, the edits that are being reverted and correct your editing pattern. Canterbury Tail talk 19:45, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon, how could that edit be distuptive? It is just meant to point out a recognized Easter egg without openly defining it as such, but as a standard plpt element. I'd just call this "Inclusionism".

Aledownload (talk) 08:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As you clearly have no intention of citing your additions despite repeatedly having this requirement pointed out to you, I have now blocked you indefinitely. Comments such as "how could that edit be disruptive" shows the previous blocks simply aren't working. Any admin is free to unblock you if you demonstrate a clear understanding of WP:NOR and WP:CITE and firmly commit to refraining from all further original research and firmly commit to citing all further additions. --Yamla (talk) 10:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, how can I commit that?

Aledownload (talk) 12:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Write an unblock request. Briefly explain your understanding of WP:CITE and WP:NOR. Explain why this edit (for example) was inappropriate and show how you'd make an edit like that in the future. --Yamla (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked as I have understood that every edit must have a cited source (even if it already is on this Wiki) and must not be based on original research. My edit on Monsters, Inc. was inappropriate as it was unsourced and a trivia elememt of original research, which should be reported in another section or article, focusing on Easter eggs, with a proper reference pointing to a source. Thank you and pardon me for all this enormous affair. Aledownload (talk) 13:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Normally this would be an acceptable unblock request, but you've been getting warnings about original research since 2016, and you haven't even acknowledged them. It shouldn't take a block to make you abide by Wikipedia's most fundamental policies. What's different this time? Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Aledownload (talk) 13:01, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections: Aledownload (talk) 13:14, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you did not explain why the above edit was inappropriate, nor did you show how you'd make an edit like that in the future. Your request as-is may be sufficient to convince an admin to lift the block, but it's not sufficient to convince me. --Yamla (talk) 13:03, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand I've made many errors, but being blocked forever is an oversized penalty. I have understood that I had to cite sources to avoid my edits from being classified as original research, but I still think that, having made many useful edits, I shouldn't be kept from editing.

Aledownload (talk) 14:50, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just an administrative note. People aren't likely to be called back to your talk page unless you log another unblock request. That will notify administrators that someone should come and look at your page. Otherwise people won't necessarily come and take a look at random. So I'd open another unblock request in order to get people's attention. Canterbury Tail talk 19:48, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unblock discussion

I'm sorry, but this is the third block in a very short amount of time and I'm dubious that there will be no recurrence.-- Deep fried okra 13:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am dubious myself. This has been a pattern for years, people have been reverting Aledownload's edits for years for inserting analysis and original research and it's quite clear they don't get it and haven't been listening. They also don't participate in any discussions around their edits. It's up to another admin, but I'm not convinced and I feel this was inevitable, it's just taken longer than it should have to reach this point. Canterbury Tail talk 14:22, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

With all the respect, I have also done some useful edits, and, yes, there have been many revertions, but I guess that's normal and I've never done it for vandalism. They were always good-faith.

Aledownload (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like very much to be unblocked as I have understood my errors, though they span for a long time, and would like to continue editing, this time correctly, as I'm also starting to notice errors and missing informations in various articles that I'd like to repair, as I won't start another Wikipedia userpage. Aledownload (talk) 11:17, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"yes, there have been many revertions, but I guess that's normal" No. No, that's not normal. What on earth makes you think that?!? If your edits were all made in good faith, you are essentially saying you lack sufficient competence to abide by Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, even when they are pointed out to you. That's deeply problematic. --Yamla (talk) 23:56, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I however do think that I should be enabled to edit, as I have understood my errors, I had just misunserstood how citing sources was important, and yes, I have been wrong there. But there are still plenty of articles that I would edit, citing sources, so that I could accomplish my goal as a Wikipedia: make this encyclopedia more complete. Aledownload (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Only one request at a time. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:45, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Canterbury Tail:; @Yamla:

Hello, I just wanted to know, is there any chance that this block will ever end?

Aledownload (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Any admin is free to lift the block if you convince them you understand why your edits were inappropriate and convince them you'll never again make an unsourced addition and convince them you will cease engaging in original research. I asked you to "explain why this edit (for example) was inappropriate and show how you'd make an edit like that in the future". So far, you have not done so. You've given some hand-wavy explanation, but haven't for example shown what reliable source you could use to cite that content. You've also stated that it is normal to have many of your edits reverted, even though that's blatantly incorrect. I don't believe it's appropriate to lift your block at this time, but if you address the issues raised by me and by others, you can be unblocked at any time. --Yamla (talk) 13:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:

Then I should, other than what I've already said, just cite a source for that edit?

Aledownload (talk) 14:01, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need to do that, along with addressing the other concerns I and others have raised. --Yamla (talk) 14:25, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:

Well, the fact that there is a resemblance with A Bug's Life is already stated in List of Pixar film references, that could be the source.

Aledownload (talk)

No. No no no. Please go back and read WP:RS and WP:CITE. Using List of Pixar film references as a citation for this information is deeply inappropriate and shows you haven't grasped the problem yet. --Yamla (talk) 15:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:

Beg you padon, I haven't been specific, I meant the reference that is in that article (currently number 22). Sorry for my imprecision.

--Aledownload (talk) 09:37, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Aledownload is currently evading his block by editing as an IP on the article for the TV series Man in the High Castle. He's been reverted twice as an IP now, after a long string of similar edits before his block, and seems to have no idea that his edits are WP:OR, much less the policy that surrounds such edits. If he persists, the article will have to have protection, which is always unfair to productive IP editors. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 20:48, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You do know that has pretty much guaranteed that you will not get unblocked, and may well end up with a community ban from Wikipedia? Canterbury Tail talk 21:49, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, it is unclear to me that the IP user making those edits is indeed Aledownload. It's certainly possible, I just want to express I have some doubt on this point. I won't explain exactly why, though if an admin wants to know, send me an email. --Yamla (talk) 22:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually looking more closely, I think you may be right. Canterbury Tail talk 22:35, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There’s a very consistent pattern that another editor and I both noticed. My comments are based on that. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 23:08, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've had a look at this, and fail to see any clear similarities - in fact, I see some telling differences, as apparently does Yamla. Drmargi, would you mind expanding on the reason you think this IP is Aledownload (happy for you to do so via email if you prefer)? I am able to check, but don't at this point see any compelling evidence that would warrant me doing so. Yunshui ^雲 _水 23:59, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for not getting back to you on this; I got pulled away and forgot to reply! I'm happy to defer to you as to whether this is block evasion. You see far more than I do, and I can't rule out being subject to a self-fulfilling prophesy. ----Dr.Margi ✉ 04:52, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:, @Ping and Drmargi:,

That's ABSOLUTELY NOT ME! I have given hours to that page, and that's true, but I'm not doing anything with dynamic IPs or things like those (I also have to admit my ignorance in the field).

Aledownload (talk) 11:55, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

With the owed respect, I still don't understand atbwhich point this affair is, at the moment, and if the The Man in the High Castle (TV series) incident has been solved. This said, I'd still like to be unblocked. Respectful, Aledownload (talk) 18:49, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please demonstate an edit that you would like to make. It should include a citation to a reliable source. For example: "I would add the following text to The Man in the High Castle: Reviewing the third season of ''[[The Man in the High Castle]]'', Adi Robertson of ''[[The Verge]]'' described the show as departing from the novel but retaining Dick's vision and themes.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.theverge.com/2018/10/11/17961746/man-in-the-high-castle-season-three-amazon-characters-philip-k-dick-analysis-alexa-davalos|title=Man in the High Castle’s protagonists are helpless in the most Philip K. Dick ways|last=Robertson|first=Robertson|work=[[The Verge]]|date=October 11, 2018|accessdate=October 10, 2019}}<ref>" Now that I've given you an example of what I'm looking for, it's your turn to show what you would add to an article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@NinjaRobotPirate:, it doesn't have to be on that very article, does it?

For the record, this editor does not seem to have engaged in logged-out block evasion at The Man in the High Castle (TV series). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:01, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Anything, whatever. Just suggest an edit and prove that you know how to add sourced content to Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:59, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would not object to unblocking this user if they demonstrate an appropriate, well-sourced edit, given NJP's note they have not engaged in logged-out block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 17:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate:, @Yamla:, to make an example of sourced editing, I'd write in List of Space: 1999 vehicles#Swift that Swifts do appear, helping to build the Space Dock in Space: 1999: Aftershock, issue #1, citing that very comic as source. --Aledownload (talk) 11:18, 13 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Wow. No. That's totally inappropriate and shows you don't understand our policies at all. Wow. On this basis, I strongly oppose unblocking you at this time. --Yamla (talk) 11:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:, sorry for answering so late. Okay, you're right, I can't understand where I'm wrong, I made an example of an edit about a piece of media, citing the media itself as the source. Maybe I'm missing something. Would you mind better explaining where I'm wrong? Aledownload (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Your proposed edit is an example of original research; see WP:NOR. And it does not use a reliable source; see WP:RS. --Yamla (talk) 14:19, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla:, Aah! Okay, I just didn't figure that out, may I still demonstrate I do understand those rules (though, I have to admit, this time I didn't realize this broke them)? --Aledownload (talk) 14:56, 24 October 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Yes. Note, though, that this is a really serious problem and will count significantly against any unblock request you make. --Yamla (talk) 15:14, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aledownload (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I again do demand to be unblocked from my block status. I do recognize the rightfullness of my blocking, I understand my errors, and, as I already did, I will try again to demonstrate my understanding of citation policies by suggesting an edit to List of James Bond allies#Valentih Dmitrovich Zhukovsky, by adding text that specifies that the character does also appear in the video game GoldeneEye 007, explaining the wide differences in storyline and citing https://jamesbond.fandom.com/wiki/Valentin_Zukovsky_(Alec_Newman) (Wikia has already been used as a source about works of fiction, this cannot be denied. Hopeful that you will trust me when I state that I understood my errors, during this long time of blocking, --Aledownload (talk) 11:10, 1 December 2019 (UTC).[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, no. I do not respond well to demands. Whether others have used Wikia as a source or not, it is not a reliable source as Wikipedia defines it. Anyone can edit Wikia.I could if I were willing to jump through their hoops. You have not actually, stated what actions led to your block and what you will do instead. Please review WP:GAB for options related to appealing your block. I hold the possible block evasion in abeyance. We do not link IP's to accounts. If that was you, please don't.-- Deep fried okra 22:38, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

No. As you appear to believe this is an acceptable reliable source, there's really nothing more we can possibly do for you. I have revoked talk page access. Another admin will be along shortly to review your request. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if your request is declined. You'll need to demonstrate substantially deeper understanding of our policies and guidelines if you take advantage of UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 11:31, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfroCine: Join the Months of African Cinema this October!

Greetings!

After a successful first iteration of the “Months of African Cinema” last year, we are happy to announce that it will be happening again this year, starting from October 1! In the 2018 edition of the contest, about 600 Wikipedia articles were created in at least 8 languages. There were also contributions to Wikidata and Wikimedia commons, which brought the total number of wikimedia pages created during the contest to over 1,000.

The AfroCine Project welcomes you to October, the first out of the two months which have been dedicated to creating and improving content that centre around the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora. Join us in this global edit-a-thon, by helping to create or expand articles which are connected to this scope. Also remember to list your name under the participants section.

On English Wikipedia, we would be recognizing participants in the following manner:

Overall winner (1st, 2nd, 3rd places)
Diversity winner
Gender-gap fillers

For further information about the contest, the recognition categories and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. See you around :).--Jamie Tubers (talk) 00:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

A heads up, since you disappointingly decided to evade your block rather than dealing with it here as you should by creating User:Dr. Andrey Smyslov this doesn't look well on you. A word of warning, if you create another sock then under WP:3X you will end up being completely site banned. Canterbury Tail talk 18:57, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap fillers - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
Diversity winner - $100
Gender-gap filler - $100
Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

Nomination for deletion of Template:2112 tracks

Template:2112 tracks has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:02, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star Wars Rollinz toys

The article Star Wars Rollinz toys has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources at all online apart from websites like Ebay, and the actual company that makes the toys (https://www.graniepartners.com/en/case-history/rollinz-star-wars/). Which reads exactly how it was intended - an ad.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of GoldenEye (1995 video game)

The article GoldenEye (1995 video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable enough to have its own article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:JB SMERSH stories

Template:JB SMERSH stories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --wooden superman 08:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional spaceplanes has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional spaceplanes has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 13:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]