User talk:AbsentPat

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 23:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feldhues Group moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Feldhues Group, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Lido Shuffle, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Doctorhawkes (talk) 05:34, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hello AbsentPat. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Devin Millar, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AbsentPat. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=AbsentPat|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:24, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm struggling to find sources of this guy, but I found him and was surprised he didn't have a page yet. It already does looks like someone else tried to make this but though from the looks if it it seems like he changed in popularity compared to the last time a page of him was attempted. But for your information, no I am not paid. AbsentPat (talk) 23:29, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're almost exclusively adding paid/fake/seo sources. Please stop. If you're not able to evaluate reliable sources, then it would be a very good idea to avoid WP:BLPs. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well sometimes it can be hard to tell considering how close most of them look to actual magazines and news sources. AbsentPat (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to try to pay more attention to these. Looking back it really looks someone ordered a lot of PR for themselves. Thank you for the tip. AbsentPat (talk) 23:39, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Feldhues Group has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Feldhues Group. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:07, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Feldhues Group (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Feldhues Group instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Feldhues Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AbsentPat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devin Millar (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Devin Millar instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Devin Millar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Erika (singer) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Erika (singer), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EdmHopLover1995 (talk) 01:36, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Hello (disambiguation). However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Dr Greg talk 01:54, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Machine-translated articles

Please stop creating machine-translated articles (and untranslated articles in case of dewiki) in other language versions. You have already been blocked in the Danish Wikipedia and the German Wikipedia for that reason.

It is expected that translators are competent in the languages they are creating articles in. It does not matter if it a translation or not. Bare machine translations without working out the kinks is generally not allowed. You are generating work for the regular editors in other wikis who now have to check your articles, see if some are salvageable or delete them. Count Count (talk) 04:56, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jaba Daba (Caveman)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jaba Daba (Caveman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article does not exist or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:53, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kelvin Krash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelvin Krash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kelvin Krash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:55, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Natural Born Hippies

Hello, AbsentPat,

Thank you for creating Natural Born Hippies.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Looks like a good start, could use some copy-editing for grammar, but overall no major issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|IceBergYYC}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

IceBergYYC (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Machine translations

Please, stop creating machine translated articles in so many languages. This just provide more workload for editors. Your account was requested to be globally locked, but I decided to give you another chance. Please, cooperate. —Teles «Talk to me˱_{M @ C S}˲» 02:31, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devin Millar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EDM. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Devin Millar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devin Millar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Devin Millar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 11:35, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Erika (singer)

Hello, AbsentPat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erika".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 08:06, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Meet Arnold moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Meet Arnold. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GMH Melbourne (talk) 11:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of F'real (disambiguation)

The article F'real (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unnecessary disambiguation page per WP:ONEOTHER. A hatnote has been added to F'Real. A hatnote is unnecessary from F'real (brand) since it contains a disambiguator.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:20, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rylo Huncho for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rylo Huncho is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rylo Huncho until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

TolWol (talk) 04:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

F'real (brand) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to F'real (brand). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and most of the sources are based off press releases or sponsored content, and we can't have an article only based on what the company has to say about itself (see WP:ORGIND). I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of F'real (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on F'real (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:35, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi AbsentPat. Thank you for your work on Harvey's Butter Rum Batter. Another editor, Babegriev, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start for an article. I'd suggest better structuring this article. As-is, it speaks about the company, the product and the founder all somewhat anonymously. Better structuring and some WP:CE would go a long way.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Babegriev}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bgv. (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dot's Homestyle Pretzels for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dot's Homestyle Pretzels is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dot's Homestyle Pretzels until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

RodrigoIPacce (talk) 11:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Meet Arnold

Hello, AbsentPat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Meet Arnold, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:07, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]