Jump to content

User:Avicennasis/todo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


User-reported

[edit]
There's certainly enough there for a block, but it is Being discussed with the user. and they have indicated they will change it. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:45, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Question: @CycloneYoris:, could you clarify what entity is being promoted by the name? They have quite a few edits. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 21:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@Just Step Sideways: No specific entity, but the nature of their edits gives the impression that they're promoting a topic. CycloneYoris talk! 21:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)


Current requests for increase in protection level

[edit]
Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Temporary extended confirmed protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Hopping IP keeps changing information without sources or consensus. - FlightTime Public (open channel) 13:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. That IP range has been making such MOS:NATIONALITY edits to other pages, too, so I mainspace p-blocked them for a week with a note warning them against repeating that. FlightTime, regarding WP:ECP: you do realize that WP:SEMI covers all IPs, right? Anyway, feel free to relist if further problems arise. Thank you. El_C 14:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@El C: Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:29, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@El C: The ECP was an error, I do know that semi covers all IP's. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:37, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Disruptive sockpuppetry by User:Kicks of seven who is know going by the name User:Blurrygim, the page is almost 100% the same as User:Curiousbones which has been blocked.Catfurball (talk) 16:51, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Blurrygim (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. Indef. Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Edit warring by @Lavipao: Beshogur (talk) 18:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked: Lavipao (talk · contribs) blocked by Daniel Case. for one week as they have been alerted to CTOPS and community sanctions in this topic area. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Ip's going back and fourth changing information. Magical Golden Whip (talk) 19:26, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent disruptive editing (spam links, vandalism etc.) mixed in with some good faith IP edits. Protection log shows that disruption has been ongoing for many years, perhaps a case for long-term pending changes? Entranced98 (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – While this is a bit extraordinary, there are many unregistered/IP users who appear to be complaining about the map in their own section on the talk page, rendering the talk page very long and the conversation scattered. If the page could be protected, and users directed to the map discussion on Commons, I think this would effectively improve the encyclopedia and the maintenance thereof. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Suspected socks are running an edit war.––kemel49(connect)(contri) 20:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: High level of ip vandalism in last few days [[1]], [[2]], [[3]] etc. Theonewithreason (talk) 20:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism continued after the previous protection expired. The talk page may also need to be protected. XabqEfdg (talk) 21:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Ymblanter (talk) 22:25, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Hello. Given that this article has been the victim not only of sockpuppets but also a bone of contention who claim that one did this and the other that, avoiding good coexistence, teamwork and contributing to Wikipedia; I request through this message that the the block is only and exclusively for Extended confirmed users. With this we continue to avoid more problems, although I do not understand why you should delete editions with their sources just because it was done by a sockpuppet. Thank you. JeanMercier90 (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Edit warring by IP hopper. CycloneYoris talk! 22:22, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Continued IP vandalism (2803.xx) since previous PP expired. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:46, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 23:01, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

[edit]
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Reason:Article is in a poorly written state and barely gets meaningful contributions since it was last protected. No signs of disruptive editing for a long time either.Axedd (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

@Axedd: Is the long-term abuser that caused the article to be ECP'd still active on other articles? —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:46, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
Last time this specific user was active was 4 years ago according to his case page. I believe another sock caused this page to locked over an year ago for edit warring, but they weren't solely interested in this particular page. Axedd (talk) 16:52, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
The case page is not a reliable indicator of if an LTA is active or not, especially if they're reveling in the attention. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 08:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @Yamaguchi先生 --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
20:18, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you Axedd for being in touch and Jéské for the ping. Axedd, you are already able to edit this article in the currently protected state. For context, there have been over 18 different page protections applied over the years due to long term abuse, block evasion, and persistent disruption in general. In light of this, was there any specific reason that you're looking to see this page unprotected? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:34, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The protection is no longer necessary because i believe that the metaverse is now less associated with crypto and the blockchain - especially after the rise of spatial computing. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Suggested action: Lower to WP:WHITELOCK/WP:PCPP to prevent disruptive editing from cryptospammers while still allowing for broader contribution from legitimate editors (especially IPs like me). Otherwise, if no cryptospam is expected, remove protection completely. 67.209.128.24 (talk) 15:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Pinging @El C. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
16:19, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Susan dying in August. If the page is to stay protected, the protection reason should at least be changed. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Not unprotected Per WP:BDP, BLP status usually extends for at least six months after the person's death. So ask again in March. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: The page was protected due to BLP, and is still protected for that reason despite Steed dying in 2012. He's been dead for 12 years, so I don't think WP:BDP applies here. 100.7.34.111 (talk) 20:30, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Unprotected WP:TRYUNPROT seems justifiable. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Reason: I have submitted both to the talk page and to the administrator a well researched and sourced addition to this page pertaining to Ukrainian special forces fighting Russians in Syria and no one has answered me, therefore this page cannot be updated based on new information. (If anyone wants me to provide the information again please ask).

Downgrading this page to semi protection will still leave this page protected and will allow the page to be updated more.

I am actively monitoring this page and if someone consistently does vandalism to this page we can always revert it and ask to upgrade the protection again.

Thanks. Historyguy1138 (talk) 21:49, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

[edit]
Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.


This, I think, is the first time I've made a suggestion. Hopefully, I'm doing this correctly.

The lateral fricative voiced retroflex, as an example, has an IPA representation of ɖɭ˔ according to its Wikipedia page, but the IPA Pulmonic table and other tables use the Unicode representation in the table and any font I have found just doesn't handle that character,

Would it be better to use the IPA representation which I think many fonts handle since the table has 'IPA' in its title and its link points to the Wikipedia page with both representations? The linked article each cell in the table states that the representation the IPA version and that the Unicode character is implied from that.

I'd be happy to make a list of each table and cell where this occurs if that is necessary and you think these will be worthwhile changes. BLWBebopKid (talk) 19:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Kwamikagami as they are likely to have some insight to these issues. For me personally, I'm not sure. I happen to have fonts installed that handle the extIPA symbols, but I'm in the stark minority there. Remsense ‥  01:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
ExtIPA is IPA. It's just a specialized subset. For example, extIPA can be used in the 'Illustrations of the IPA' published in JIPA.
The issue is one of font support. The letters in question date to 2015, though they weren't added to Unicode until 2021. There are websites that list fonts that support various characters. These are supported by the SIL fonts, which are the best free IPA fonts available. If you don't have a good font installed, you're not going to be able to view IPA correctly anyway. That's why we have the IPA notice in articles, that you may need to install an IPA font to view the article properly. — kwami (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

[edit]

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

User:Avicennasis/todo/Header

Current requests

[edit]

Account creator

[edit]

Autopatrolled

[edit]

User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Stating my support here. Encouraged him to seek this. He's told me about his plans for future articles and they seem to involve careful research up to GNG standards. His recent work has passed through GA and DYK, so quality is there. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

During the temporary stint granted as autopatrolled, I have created over 100 pages following the suggestions of the admin. Have been consistently adding relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them. Have also started using Rater and StubSorter. Trying to strengthen myself with Wikipedia's core content policies by regular reading. Requesting extension... Davidindia (talk) 09:25, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user was granted temporary autopatrolled rights by Schwede66 (expires 00:00, 15 December 2024 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
 Done Thanks for taking all the suggestions on board; good work! Schwede66 01:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I have created 40 articles out of which 2 are deleted with a total edits of 2680, as of now. I also found myself listed in Wikipedia:Database reports/Editors eligible for Autopatrol privilege. I promise, it'll be worth if I'm given the Autopatrolled privilege. Thanks, Hoping for a positive response. Taabii (talk) 15:12, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry but the two deletions at AfD mean that your creations will have to be review for at least another year or so.  Not done. – Joe (talk) 19:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
@Joe Roe Thanks for the response. Taabii (talk) 17:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Created 69 articles, new creations do not appear to require patrolling. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done Clean articles. I agree with your assessment, User:Pppery. That said, I suggest that you don't have to list candidates here where you've satisfied yourself that they are eligible; you can just assign the flag yourself. Schwede66 01:36, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

I, Indonesiainfo24, hereby request to be granted the Autopatrolled status on Wikipedia. I have been actively contributing to the creation and maintenance of articles on Wikipedia, and I always strive to adhere to the guidelines and policies in place, including neutrality, verifiability, and article quality standards.

The reasons I am requesting this status are as follows:

  • I have contributed to articles that have been published, making improvements and adding relevant information.
  • I am familiar with the guidelines for good and proper writing on Wikipedia.
  • I have not engaged in vandalism or any other violations of Wikipedia's policies.

I hope my request will be considered, and I am committed to continuing my contributions in a manner that aligns with Wikipedia’s guidelines.

Thank you for your attention and the opportunity.

Sincerely, Indonesiainfo24 it has begun... 13:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has created roughly 5 articles. MusikBot talk 13:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done No LLM-generated permission requests. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:37, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

AutoWikiBrowser

[edit]


I want to get into the swing of helping out in more ways other than RCP/PCP. Manually editing each article can only do so much. This would be handy to have. Synorem (talk) 06:14, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Do you have any specific task in mind for this? * Pppery * it has begun... 21:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
Particularly for tasks like fixing broken templates and adding article-improvement templates. Since I frequently go through hundreds of articles a day via Huggle, AWB would help by allowing me to quickly add these templates without having to manually search for them and copy-paste them into each article. A recent issue that comes to mind was dealing with a few instances of {{cn}} spam, as seen here and here. This would help clear up stuff like this. Synorem (talk) 03:32, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Perform article maintenance on date formats, typos, etc. ~Darth StabroTalk  Contribs 18:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to request access to AutoWikiBrowser to assist with minor edits, formatting, and other repetitive tasks. –𝐎𝐰𝐚𝐢𝐬 𝐀𝐥 𝐐𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢 ʕʘ̅͜ʘ̅ʔ 02:48, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 04:45, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I need to distribute barnstars for the November 2024 Unreferenced article Backlog drive and was advised that this was the best way to do it. (See discussion on Backlog drive Talk page.) Cielquiparle (talk) 04:34, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 15:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Requesting a swap of my AWB perms to User:Synorem (AWB). This is a legitimate alternate account specifically for AWB tasks as to prevent edit count inflation on my main account. Synorem (talk) 18:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 19:46, 10 December 2024 (UTC)


Confirmed

[edit]

I want to be a confirmed Wikipedia user because I would like to share my experiences with different kinds of things. For example "Minecraft" as a player i would like to add my experiences and report problems like bugs. Theteacher reference (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done "Sharing your experiences" is explicitly not what Wikipedia is for, and certainly not a valid reason to confirm an account early. Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 22:56, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Event coordinator

[edit]

Extended confirmed

[edit]

Legitimate alternate account used for improving articles via WP:AWB. Synorem (talk) 20:06, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:07, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

File mover

[edit]

Mass message sender

[edit]


New page reviewer

[edit]

I see that there is a large backlog, so I would like to help reduce it, especially the redirects, as I have more experience with them. I have not created any articles, but I have read the tutorials for NPR and related pages, so I will not make any unintentional (or intentional) detrimental edits. I am familiar with WP:BLAR, WP:PROD and WP:AfD, and have behaved civilly with other editors. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Typically we would hope for a bit more experience, but I've liked what I've seen from you.  Done for a two-month trial, thank you for volunteering. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily (yes, mistakenly got a copyright report for an article) focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh.

Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 06:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([4]). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done, having reviewed your participation at AfD, I'm not seeing any clear indication that you understand the relevant policies, guidelines, and discussion norms. signed, Rosguill talk 17:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to become an NPR to help reduce the work, I regularly intervene on drafts and edit them to format them and put banners or comments to advise the creator on the steps to follow so that this draft becomes eligible, in the case that it is possible. I know the rules of Wikipedia and the essential points determining if an article is eligible or not. I see drafts being submitted but they are clearly not ready to be accepted and unfortunately I can't do anything at this time. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your interest in this permission. However, I'm concerned that your AfD participation is largely limited to pile-on votes at this time and is not indicative of sufficient understanding of relevant policies and guidelines. Some of the reasoning and wording of these !votes is further concerning (e.g. at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Cordeiro, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Januário Jesus).  Not done signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 10 December 2024 (UTC)


I'm requesting new page reviewer rights.

Hello I'm TyphoonAmpil. I'm meet all minimum requirements. I'm over 45+ AfC reviews and 5+ Accepted drafts. I'm adding tags {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} tags. I'm created 4 articles named Tropical Storm Maria (2024), Typhoon Ampil (2024), Typhoon Shanshan (2024), Typhoon Krathon. ~🌀 Ampil 💬 / 📝 04:54, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 17:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Help out with the backlog. Well informed on content policies and guidelines. Fairly steady AfD participation history (looking past the big ugly chunk of "speedy keep" on my AfD history from a few hours ago, where I AfD'd a set of related articles but then decided to withdraw and WP:BLAR them instead.) ~~~~ RachelTensions (talk) 03:42, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering,  Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged to re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:44, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Requesting NPR rights; Nearly 2700 total live edits. While I am familiar with AfC and article creation (three articles under my name, working on a fourth), I am admittedly not terribly familiar with AfD, PROD, or CSD. However, I am reading and re-reading these pages to familiarize myself. I believe I have a favorable history of interaction. I've been on Wikipedia for over a decade, and I have absorbed much, though I still have a significant amount to learn; that being said, I wish to become more active and more directly-involved. No behavioral blocks or 3RR violations. I commit to 'patrol' on a voluntary basis and to avoid conflicts of interest. Thank you for your time and consideration! MWFwiki (talk) 03:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for volunteering, MWFwiki. Looking at AfCstats, unless there's a mistake there, it doesn't look like you've reviewed any AfC articles? And as far as article creation goes, we're really looking for something more in the range of 25+ creations You don't have to do them all, but even from someone with your experience we need to see some prior experience in at least one of the areas mentioned under point 2 of WP:NPRCRITERIA before granting this right, sorry –  Not done for the bot. Please do consider giving WP:AFC reviewing a go. – Joe (talk) 07:56, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Sure, thing! Thank you :-) MWFwiki (talk) 10:28, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

I believe I meet all of the NPP criteria. I have experience at AFD, having a lifetime match rate of around 80%, and have been a reviewer at AFC as well. I don't believe I have any other significant issues. I wish to gain this right in order to help with the backlog of new pages needing review, both in order to help the community and to gain more experience. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 14:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering,  Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged to re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I am requesting again for New Page Reviewer, although quite fast but I am a fast lerner. I just wanna have a trial here since I am helping sometimes in NewPagesFeed like maintenance tags like {{unreferenced}}, {{orphan}} and {{uncategorized}} or rarely i clean up the articles too, it just a minor helps. I am a AfC reviewer too since October 2024. I can multitasking on New Page and reviewing draft articles in afc. Although, I have a blocked here but it was a misunderstanding and false blocking so they unblock my account. I am participating on AfD and sometimes i nominate it, also on CSD too in NewPageFeed, if I see a just a spam, vandalism or a promotion of a article, i immediately add a csd. If you granted me, it will my pleasure. Thanks! Royiswariii Talk! 16:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for volunteering,  Done for a 2-month trial. You are encouraged to re-apply roughly a week before the permission is set to expire. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:49, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Dear Wikipedian,

I am requesting for New Page Reviewer rights to enhance my contributions to Wikipedia. With major experience in article creation, editing, and compliance to Wikipedia’s guidelines, I am passionate to help ensure new pages meet quality standards. I am committed to improving the Wikipedia community and would greatly appreciate your consideration.

Thank you for your time! 𝒮-𝒜𝓊𝓇𝒶 18:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 2 requests for new page reviewer declined in the past 90 days ([5][6]). MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. You still have not taken the advice given to you and lack the appropriate experience at this point in time. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I'd love to help out with the backlog. I have around ~40 AfD !votes, and I'm usually one of the first votes and always use strong guideline-backed reasoning. I've only had 1 AfD in the "red" cell of AfD Stats, that was a bio of a person from a non-English speaking country, and I tried to find sources in my WP:BEFORE, but nothing come up, and then another user more familiar with that country was able to dig something up so I withdrew (I don't think it should count as a black mark against me). I've also reviewed a lot of AfC submissions (a good amount of them sadly don't show in the AfC tool as they were later deleted, but there's still a decent chunk in there), and I almost always provide personalized advice backed with good reasoning when declining. You can find my CSD log here (n. 10, 100% success): User:MolecularPilot/CSD_Log, and I've also created 5 articles (see my user page), 4 of which are B class. Thanks for your time! :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:30, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Adding that I'm also very experienced in cleaning formatting, copy editing, wiki linking etc. as I often do that before accepting AfC submissions, and for evidence of criteria #3 about being kind to new users, I think I've helped a good amount of users understand policies/guidelines/reasons for AfC declines etc, a small subset of these can by verified on my user talk page and I'm also very active on the help IRC (admittedly less during the last week due to a personal event). I'm also knowledgable about copyvios, having cleaned a decent amount, informing users about our policy, answering any questions they sent to me and requesting revdel. I've also reviewed around 20 cases on CopyPatrol. Thanks again for your time :) MolecularPilot 🧪️✈️ 05:32, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Page mover

[edit]


Pending changes reviewer

[edit]

I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Calling this as a WP:NOTYET. Let's wait a little longer after the unblock to consider this. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough. JayCubby 23:34, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

I monitor recent edits to combat vandalism and improve articles, I also act on drafts, I have a good knowledge of Wikipedia rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC) SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:21, 5 December 2024 (UTC)



Rollback

[edit]

My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: as a sure guarantee my use of rollback is done safely and without causing any significant issue, I'll use Mr. Stradivarius' ConfirmRollback. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 186 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 21:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done I don't see enough of a history of quality contributions to articles yet. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Would be used for reverting edits by blocked socks of banned users, similar to this request nableezy - 20:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:20, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Jet Pilot (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: User changed their name from Tres Libras to Jet Pilot since submitting this request. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
)
21:27, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Yeah, that's true. Jet Pilot (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I had been actively patrolling RC in 2023 but paused for a long time since I was too busy. I plan to resume soon and would like rollback rights to make it easier. However, I mostly edit on my school computer so I am unable to use any tools such as Huggle, RedWarn, etc. Thank you for considering my request.

Note from 07:07, 6 December 2024 (UTC): I had just been informed that RedWarn can be used on a school computer, so it's very likely that I will be using it. xRozuRozuteacups 23:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I have been reverting vandalism by undoing edits, warning users, and monitoring several pages to keep them protected. Rollback rights would make my efforts faster and more efficient. I am familiar with WP:VANDAL. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 07:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)


Template editor

[edit]



Reports

[edit]

User-reported

[edit]