Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 April 8

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 7 << Mar | April | May >> April 9 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 8

[edit]

01:24:35, 8 April 2022 review of submission by 2601:241:480:6340:0:0:0:8F56

[edit]


VegNews, the world’s largest plant-based media brand, has just announced KALE MY NAME as the 2022 Veggie AwardTM Winner for BEST VEGAN CASUAL RESTAURANT. In the 22nd annual Veggie AwardsTM, more than 2 million votes were cast in 57 categories ranging from Best Vegan Cheese, Ice Cream, and Meat to Favorite Vegan Celebrity, Athlete, and Social Media Star. The annual Veggie AwardsTM is the largest survey of vegan products, people, and places on the planet. “Kale My Name” is a leader in the plant-based industry and continues to develop stellar vegan meals. We are pleased to honor your accomplishments with a 2022 Veggie AwardTM,” says VegNews Publisher Colleen Holland. Kale My Name is a globally inspired 100% Plant Based restaurant.

2601:241:480:6340:0:0:0:8F56 (talk) 01:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you can provide more sources than that, the same issues - i.e. the overwhelming majority of the sourcing being Kale My Name being used as a prop in a source that's hardly about Kale My Name - are in play. In fact, the sourcing for the draft at present is completely unchanged from January, and you've done jack to correct it. See also the March 2022 and January 2022 threads. As none of the edits since January have actually done anything to improve the sourcing, I am going to start reverting off requests for this article as disruptive if it's clear the sourcing hasn't been touched since the last thread. Stop trying to use Wikipedia to promote this company. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 03:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

02:44:29, 8 April 2022 review of draft by 142.114.185.52

[edit]


I am new to Wikipedia and I don't know much about editing drafts. How much kilobytes should there be for main space? 142.114.185.52 (talk) 02:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gigabytes? We chop down articles that are above 50 or so kilobytes in length; that's smaller by a couple orders of magnitude. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 03:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh my bad 142.114.185.52 (talk) 11:50, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:32:05, 8 April 2022 review of draft by TrueStay

[edit]


Hi, I was wondering if I could get any pointers on why this looks like promotional content? Besides the companies stated value, all sources are external to the company. Should I try to find an external source for the company value? To confirm I am not affiliated with this company in any way, all information has been put together from articles, which is how I assumed other pages are created (though I did see many pages that site information from the company specifically - is this not accurate and if so how do I flag those pages to Wikipedia)? Thanks

TrueStay (talk) 04:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TrueStay: This is a bulleted list, not prose. Even disregarding that, routine business news isn't useful for notability. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

04:56:09, 8 April 2022 review of submission by PriyadharshiniRajkumar

[edit]


this is the autobiography of me Priyadarshini Rajkumar well-known actress in Tamil film industry for the past two decades. I have provided self-sufficient external resources. why it is not getting approved and if it's getting rejected help me out where is the exact issue is?

PriyadharshiniRajkumar (talk) 04:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PriyadharshiniRajkumar: We have little tolerance for autobiographies due to the inherent conflict of interest when writing about oneself. This draft has a frankly obscene amount of unreferenced biographical claims which in and of themselves are reason to decline a draft; other than that, mu. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05:13:48, 8 April 2022 review of submission by 202.149.222.58

[edit]

Request to review again and give opportunity to list our company information on Wiki page, In content we have only added company details, We are not advertising. 202.149.222.58 (talk) 05:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A distinction without a difference. We're not a listing; we're an encyclopaedia project. And to that point, this draft cites absolutely zero sources, making it dead on arrival. You need to provide multiple in-depth, non-routine, independent news articles written by identifiable authors in outlets with editorial oversight responsible for fact-checking, disclosure, retractions, and corrections in order for an article to even be considered. You, personally, are also obligated to register an account and formally disclose your relationship with the company. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 05:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

05:24:54, 8 April 2022 review of draft by DavidJRohde

[edit]


I created the article: Draft:Emma Reilly and submitted an early version. I received feedback to say she was not notable. I added further references to show she was notable, but received a further comment that she is best known for one event. This is debatable - in french she has a wikipedia page: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emma_Reilly but I see it as valid. It was suggested that I then create a page on her and the event, which I did which is here: Draft:Allegation of UN sharing names of dissidents with the Chinese Communist Party this page has now been rejected because it is a duplicate. What is the best path to withdrawl the old article on Emma Reilly and have the new article considered for inclusion in Wikipedia? Thank you!

DavidJRohde (talk) 05:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may simply edit your original draft; do not worry about its title, if accepted it will be placed at the correct title. You can request that your second draft be deleted by placing {{db-g7}} on the draft(without the nowiki tags I have placed to suppress that function here). 331dot (talk) 08:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

07:51:43, 8 April 2022 review of draft by Edwardgao123

[edit]


Excuse me, is there an editor to help me review my newly created draft? Many thanks:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:CCGrass


Edwardgao123 (talk) 07:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edwardgao123 You must actually submit your draft for review by clicking the "submit your draft for review" button located in the box at the top of your draft. 331dot (talk) 08:12, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Was my draft submitted for review ? Can`t se any confirmation

[edit]

Hey

can someone please help me to improve and publish the draft?

This: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kramatorsk_train_station_attack

Thank you

I have reviewed it. If you are trying to be first wuth the news that is not a Wiki9pedia function. Wikipedia is, typically, last with news bevcuase it is a tertiary source, reporting what is said in reliable secondary sources 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 12:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

13:08:47, 8 April 2022 review of draft by 209.6.11.83

[edit]


Reviewers are merely repeating the initial critique of my article. I have made many changes to ensure an encyclopedic style and deleted any text that sounds like an opinion. The topic is an important domain and awaits coverage. My request is to have a fresh review - not one resorting to repetition of a prior review. When comparing my entry to others, it seems to qualify as well-written, adequately referenced, and encyclopedic. I ask respectfully for your help.

209.6.11.83 (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the previous three declines, your draft reads like an essay. Theroadislong (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:19:26, 8 April 2022 review of draft by Marta.866

[edit]

I don't understand what is the problem with the article. It seems copied, but from where? This is a little treated subject on which I have written other articles myself, but if it is a writing issue, it can be corrected (English is not my native language, I do not know if there are other ways of expressing the text). Can you tell me more specifically what the problem is, or directly correct it or give me guidelines to do it myself?


Marta.866 (talk) 14:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marta.866, I believe that the reviewer thought that it was copied due to the lead section being unclear and containing some grammatical errors. Perhaps Compassionate727 (who appears to be the only active editor on Wikipedia:Translators available#Spanish-to-English) can help? The draft appears to be a translated version of an es-wiki article. Justiyaya 15:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
From a copyright perspective, copying (including translating) between Wikipedias is permitted, but you must note that have you done so in the edit summary; somebody will need to make a dummy edit and do so (I won’t do it myself right now because I’m editing from my phone, which is a pain). The grammar can be cleaned up by anyone fluent in English, so I wouldn’t worry about that too much. However, my experience is that most Spanish Wikipedia articles, including this one, are unsuitable for simple translations because they are almost entirely unsourced. Compare one of my recent projects, Juan Pablo Cardenas (with an accent on the first A of Cardenas, which I can’t type right now) with its Spanish Wikipedia counterpart; the entire article needed to be rewritten to satisfy WP:V. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 18:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Compassionate727 Thank you so much! Justiyaya 04:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:36:19, 8 April 2022 review of submission by Jacob.p.servant

[edit]

I have updated the references as requested. Jacob.p.servant (talk) 14:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:10:37, 8 April 2022 review of submission by LaurenTimeToRefresh

[edit]


I'd like to know how to undergo 'cleanup' to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, as my draft currently has a COI issue. If I could be pointed in the right direction for this process that'd be great, thank you! Also, just a note that I understand the other reasons why my article was rejected and I'll work on those too before resubmitting.

Many thanks!

LaurenTimeToRefresh (talk) 15:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

LaurenTimetoRefresh, first is read WP:COI and WP:PAID and make the proper declarations. Once that's done, follow the advice given by previous reviewers and focus on providing information from independent secondary reliable sources.Slywriter (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LaurenTimeToRefresh thank you for coming to the AFC help desk, there seems to be an lot of of unreliable sources used in the article. All contentious material about a living person must be have an inline citation that contains a reliable source supporting it. Please review our WP:COI guidelines and if you do have a COI with the subject, please disclose it. If this is unclear, feel free to reply to this message asking for clarification. Justiyaya 15:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

17:03:18, 8 April 2022 review of draft by 98.186.54.177

[edit]


I'm trying to redirect an article 2026 NFL season but i need some help redirecting the article 98.186.54.177 (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC) 98.186.54.177 (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Done see 2026 NFL season, please go to WP:Requested redirects next time, thanks! Justiyaya 17:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

19:39:35, 8 April 2022 review of submission by Kathpencill

[edit]


Kathpencill (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft name : Hirdaramani Bangladesh i am not clear why its declined to publish. can you pls explain more specifically to understand.

Just blatant advertising with zero independent sources, will be rejected if re-submitted without substantial improvement. Theroadislong (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:30:08, 8 April 2022 review of draft by Peaceonearth2022

[edit]


Need help getting article approved Peaceonearth2022 (talk) 20:30, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have resubmitted it for review, what specific help do you need? 331dot (talk) 20:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

20:44:19, 8 April 2022 review of submission by Devid 2

[edit]


Devid 2 (talk) 20:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Why my unique content article is declined

20:46:44, 8 April 2022 review of draft by Aswinarulvel

[edit]


I have created an article called Aswin's Good Apps. It has been declined due to bad refrences. Acctually, it is a good reference because it is the page. Plus those pages contains content that I used in my writing. But, they say it is not a reliable source. It is basically the webpages I am talking about. You could even search it in google. I am telling the description of them which is provided in the website I given them. Aswinarulvel (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aswinarulvel: We have zero interest in what a company says, or pays people to say, about themselves on or off-Wikipedia. We're looking for multiple in-depth, non-routine, independent news articles about the company written by identifiable authors in outlets with editorial oversight responsible for fact-checking, disclosure, retractions, and corrections; this automatically precludes citing the subject. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v a little blue Bori 21:05, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

21:19:16, 8 April 2022 review of draft by Derrick.blanton

[edit]


I am attempting to add tags to my submission but every time I attempt to add them it says " An error occurred (unexpected-result) Please try again." Derrick.blanton (talk) 21:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_April_8&oldid=1082778768"