Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 January 25

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 24 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 26 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 25

[edit]

05:52:31, 25 January 2022 review of submission by Alslogistics

[edit]

I feel unsatisfied with the admin's decision. Here is an example https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VinFast And here is my useful info -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aviation_Logistics_Corporation I repeat this is useful information, not advertising. According to international : ALS is Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis According to Vietnam: ALS is Aviation Logistics Corporation

I need your help in reopening that information for everyone to understand the correct definition of ALS in Vietnam Alslogistics (talk) 05:52, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot use the absence, presence, or condition of tangentially-related articles to argue for your own, and this is not the venue to challenge spam deletions. You are OBLIGATED to disclose your employment and change your username; failing to do either will lead to a block. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 05:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

06:09:29, 25 January 2022 review of submission by Poweruni

[edit]

Is been know around and getting to be a huge company and i think they need a chance Poweruni (talk) 06:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Poweruni, Wikipedia is not for promotion. Wikipedia deals in reliable sources. Without WP:THREE independent reliable secondary sources there is little chance of an article. Also if you work for, own, or are otherwise affiliated with the company, please read WP:COI and WP:PAID, such disclosures are not optional.Slywriter (talk) 06:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

08:06:55, 25 January 2022 review of submission by Desktarim

[edit]


Very notable. Black Community would disagree with your rejection of this page. Please look at the references. Desktarim (talk) 08:06, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep dragging race into this and you are going to deeply regret it. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Desktarim You are making it harder, not easier, for this establishment to get an article. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I did look at the sources; they are almost exclusively interviews and announcements, which do not establish notability, see WP:ORG. 331dot (talk) 08:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, we don't know the race of the people sitting at the computer, and neither do you. You are free to start your own encyclopedia with whatever criteria you wish to have. 331dot (talk) 08:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(EC) As to your sources, I refer you to the top table here:
You have no source that is unambiguously good for notability, and practically all of your sources use Kale My Name as a prop in service to Tabitha Brown. And in case you're wondering, I've blasted editors for sourcing of precisely this calibre on topics that are considerably more monochrome. This is not a matter of race, this is a matter of "Your sources are no good." —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 08:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 09:17:48, 25 January 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Tber617777

[edit]



Tber617777 (talk) 09:17, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

09:20:37, 25 January 2022 review of submission by Desktarim

[edit]


Added more references as advised. <3 <3 <3 Desktarim (talk) 09:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was rejected it will not be considered further, and spamming other articles with links to "Kale My Name" is likely to lead to a block. Theroadislong (talk) 10:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Desktarim That is not what you were advised at all. There is nothing that you can do, you will need to move on from this. And do not create new sections with every post; please edit this existing section. 331dot (talk) 11:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:11:37, 25 January 2022 review of draft by Factcheckerkhi

[edit]


Hello, this is user Factcheckerkhi. I have drafted and sent for review an article on Soch Fact Check, a fact-checking news organization that is associated with the International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), a part of the Poynter Institute for Media Studies. My first draft was turned down due to the following reasons: subject (Soch Fact Check) does not qualify for a Wikipedia article and does not show significant coverage about the subject (Soch Fact Check) in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. I checked my references and, consequently, added a dozen more references for the article to be considered trustworthy and worthy of being published. The reason I'm asking / posting here is that fact-checking is one of the most crucial jobs in present day considering how fast and vastly fake news spreads. Soch Fact Check is the top and only reliable fact-checking news organization in Pakistan and is also certified by the IFCN. Pakistan is a country rife with fake news, false claims, misleading reports, among other similar things. The primary reason for creating this article on Soch Fact Check is that Soch Fact Check has to apply for verification on Twitter in order to further cement the company's authenticity in fact-checking and to also provide a reliable, verified, and trustworthy platform on Twitter for people to turn to when misleading claims can lead to violence, conspiracy theories, anti-vaxxer propaganda, etc. It is absolutely imperative for Soch Fact Check to be verified on Twitter and, therefore, this Wikipedia article, which has been declined and not picked up again, needs to be approved and published ASAP. I understand that there are many submissions and many editors on Wikipedia and that there may be delays but this delay can end up having untoward consequences for the citizens of Pakistan.

Factcheckerkhi (talk) 14:11, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Factcheckerkhi Wikipedia has no interest in any requirements Twitter or other social media imposes on your organization for their processes. Nor does Wikipedia have any interest in enhancing search results for your organization. We are only interested in summarizing what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the organization, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable organization. It is not enough for your organization to merely exist and for any article about it to merely tell it exists and what it does. You will have to find some other way to get verified. It is curious that Twitter would allow Wikipedia as a form of verification as Wikipedia is not a reliable source. 331dot (talk) 15:27, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Factcheckerkhi: That Wikipedia article option isn't intended for companies made in the last 20 years; it's intended for entities whose career/history largely predates the Internet entirely. Hence why the Twitter page explicitly points out the article must meet our notability guidelines in some fashion. A quick-and-dirty job isn't going to cut it, and we frankly wish Twitter would stop having that as an option because the end result is relentless spam from people who only see an article and not the man-hours of work that goes into writing a well-sourced article. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
(Re-signing to fix ping) —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 20:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:39:31, 25 January 2022 review of submission by 71.174.103.90

[edit]


71.174.103.90 (talk) 15:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does enclinged mean?

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary. Any facts in Draft:Enclinged that can be substantiated by reliable sources could be added to a dictionary. --Worldbruce (talk) 16:16, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

16:53:14, 25 January 2022 review of submission by Clone Trooper07

[edit]

Hello, I just wanted a re-review because I believe that this game is, in my opinion, is important. I am an avid speedrunner of this game and I am currently trying to get this game added to the official speedrun.com selection of games. If I could get this article on Wikipedia it would make getting it on the speedrun.com games selection so much easier. Thanks have a nice day. ^-^ Clone Trooper07 (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Clone Trooper07, you seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding of wikipedia is. Wikipedia does not exist to help promote subjects. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that covers WP:NOTABLE subjects which have coverage in independent secondary reliable sources. Your article cites no sources, shows nothing notable and your submission is in bad-faith as you are trying to use wikipedia for a purpose contrary to its mission.Slywriter (talk) 17:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_January_25&oldid=1068961858"