User talk:XTheBedrockX/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TrangaBellam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TrangaBellam (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Hello, XTheBedrockX! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TrangaBellam (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

January 2023

Earlier you removed the caption from the Template for 2022 invasion of Ukraine; would if work for you if something like "Not a member nation of NATO" were to be added to replace the caption you removed earlier today? ErnestKrause (talk) 22:01, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Ukraine is, self-evidently, not a member of NATO. It doesn't seem necessary to point that out in the infobox unless it becomes a member during the war.

Ukraine is supplied by NATO, yes (and I'm okay with NATO support being mentioned if the consensus allows), but because it's not a member NATO, I'm not sure how useful a "Not a member nation of NATO" specification would be. XTheBedrockX (talk) 01:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

The template was reverted yet again by drive-through editors and I've requested the template to be fully page protected. Your comments are useful above and I'm just trying to keep drive-through editors from reverting your edits and my edits. Let me know what you think. ErnestKrause (talk) 23:21, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

If you want my opinion on it, I personally think "Previous allies annexed after 30 September 2022" should be shortened to something more concise. And I added that footnote next to Ukraine for (what I thought was) a good reason: so that people would be linked straight to the section about funding to see who's been sending aid to Ukraine. XTheBedrockX (talk) 23:39, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

I'm accepting your position on this question. Regarding your name change request for the title, then I'm strongly suggesting that you think about self-deleting it; its receiving a negative response so far, and its not going to help you stake a position on the Talk page there. Open to hearing your thoughts since I'm otherwise agreeing with alot of your other comments. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:29, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Italic 2.147.241.34 (talk) 01:48, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Recent Ethiopian Orthodox Church split article creation help

Hi, XTheBedrockX, I admire your ability of creating and maintaining article. In addition, you're a member of Wikiproject Ethiopia and that's great job to work collaboratively. I politely asked you to create an article of the recent overthrow of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church Synod, and many mass media talk about it as well as the government internet censorship. Personally, I don't push you to create the article and time may restrain you, but asking as a human, please can you create the recent overthrow attempt of the synod if possible? Thanks 196.191.221.229 (talk) 18:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Armenian–Azerbaijani war (disambiguation)/XTheBedrockX

Hello, XTheBedrockX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Armenian–Azerbaijani war (disambiguation)/XTheBedrockX, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:03, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Template:Algerian War

Hello, XTheBedrockX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Template:Algerian War, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Armenian–Azerbaijani war (disambiguation)/XTheBedrockX

Hello, XTheBedrockX. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XTheBedrockX".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict

Hello, XTheBedrockX. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyrgyzstan–Tajikistan conflict, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Algerian War has been accepted

Template:Algerian War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hey man im josh (talk) 13:09, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:French conquest of Algeria

A tag has been placed on Category:French conquest of Algeria indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

No worries! I was genuinely seconds away from adding stuff there before getting this message. XTheBedrockX (talk) 07:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Historicity has been accepted

Template:Historicity, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Taking Out The Trash (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Events leading to the Iraq War has been accepted

Template:Events leading to the Iraq War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:52, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Log in

login 2.147.241.34 (talk) 01:49, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Timeline of World War I (1917–1918)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Timeline of World War I (1917–1918) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://bootcampmilitaryfitnessinstitute.com/2021/02/28/what-was-world-war-i-1914-1918/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Prodraxis {talk • contribs} (she/her) 02:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

• Note: I have declined the speedy deletion as it is not a copyright violation. Material was copied from WW I article and attributed in the edit summary on creation. -- Whpq (talk) 03:12, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

  Thanks! Yeah, sorry about that. XTheBedrockX (talk) 04:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Contradictory line tag on July Crisis

Hi, I was reading through July Crisis, and I saw the contradictory tag you added to the Serbian Reply section. Could you clarify what you mean? e.g. specific passages. I'll see if I can fix it then. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 00:06, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

@ARandomName123 Sure thing! My basic explanation for it in the tag was this:

"Information before and after this section seem to suggest that Russia and France were prepared for war, but here, it says they were 'disinclined to risk a war with Germany'?"

Now, I'm not sure if it's a misunderstanding on my part, the sources themselves (since a lot of these mentions of "telling Serbia to stand down" come from Fromkin, 2004), or if this is how it actually played out, but before this, in "France backs Russia (20–23 July)":

The French and the Russians agreed their alliance extended to supporting Serbia against Austria, confirming the already established policy behind the Balkan inception scenario. As Christopher Clark notes "Poincare had come to preach the gospel of firmness and his words had fallen on ready ears. Firmness in this context meant an intransigent opposition to any Austrian measure against Serbia. At no point do the sources suggest that Poincare or his Russian interlocutors gave any thought whatsoever to what measures Austria-Hungary might legitimately be entitled to take in the aftermath of the assassinations".

and:

On 21 July, the Russian Foreign Minister warned the German ambassador to Russia that "Russia would not be able to tolerate Austria-Hungary's using threatening language to Serbia or taking military measures". The leaders in Berlin discounted this threat of war.

Then later, "in Russia orders partial mobilization (24–25 July)":

The Russian War Minister Vladimir Sukhomlinov and the Navy Minister Admiral Ivan Grigorovich stated that Russia was not ready for a war against either Austria or Germany, but that a firmer diplomatic stance was necessary.

And in "Russian thinking":

In addition, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Sazonov believed that war was inevitable and refused to acknowledge that Austria-Hungary had a right to counter measures in the face of Serbian irredentism. […] Crucially, the French had provided their clear support for their Russian allies for a robust response in their recent state visit just days before.

These don't strike me as countries being "disinclined" (i.e. unwilling, reluctant) for war. XTheBedrockX (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the detailed response! I actually have Fromkin's book next to me right now, which is why I've decided to try to deal with this.

For the contradictory statement, I think this is the sentence from the source that the editor used: "In the end the Czar's government suggest that Serbia--if resistance were hopeless--should retreat rather than resist, and rely on the sense of justice of Europe to rectify matters. Neither Russia nor its ally France were ready to fight, especially for Serbia."

I think the editor meant disinclined militarily, but not diplomatically (if you get what I mean). From the parts you quoted, it seems that Russia and France were taking a firmer diplomatic stance against Germany, which does not mean they were inclined to war. The militaries of Russia and France were both in no shape to fight a war, but they both had obligations. France and Russia were both in an alliance, while Russia would not have wanted Serbia to be invaded, otherwise, they would lose an important ally in the Balkans. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

@ARandomName123 That seems like a fair view of it. I think my confusion came from the word "disinclined." Since not wanting to do something and not being able to do something are different things. Russia and France may not have been prepared for a fight, but it still looks pretty clear they were willing to go to war anyway, regardless of how ready they were for a fight (and that fact alone is a critical part of understanding why Russia began partially mobilizing in the first place). XTheBedrockX (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Yep, that's my understanding of the situation as well. Do you think the sentence should still be amended for clarification? Or is it fine as it is? ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:24, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, I think changing the sentence makes sense. If only to potential avoid confusion. XTheBedrockX (talk) 01:29, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

How about: "Both Russia and France were militarily disinclined to risk a war with Germany in 1914," ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:31, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Or: "The militaries of both Russia and France were not prepared for a war against Germany in 1914"

imo, I like this one better ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:33, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

I'm definitely in favour of that one! XTheBedrockX (talk) 01:37, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for your detailed responses! ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 01:44, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome! XTheBedrockX (talk) 02:04, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Charles de Gaulle has been accepted

Template:Charles de Gaulle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:54, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	thanks for editing on the LGBT page!! :) Babysharkboss2 (talk) 14:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

You're very welcome!! XTheBedrockX (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Entry into World War I (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Template:Entry into World War I and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2022 Karnataka hijab row, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 20:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

Improper redirect

Diff See the Israel and Apartheid talk page discussion, this redirect is wrong, Genocide and Apartheid are two different things.Selfstudier (talk) 14:20, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

I'm aware, but 1) it was supposed to redirect to a subsection in the article about allegations of genocide, and 2) leaving a page that's completely blank with nothing on it is not very helpful. If you think it should be deleted, you can request for deletion and try to get a consensus there. XTheBedrockX (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about The sound of children screaming has been removed

Hello, XTheBedrockX

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sohom Datta and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect The sound of children screaming has been removed, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 15 § The sound of children screaming has been removed.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sohom Datta}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sohom (talk) 09:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Outline of the Iraq War has been accepted

Outline of the Iraq War, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 01:55, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

rfd close

Thanks for cleaning up The sound of children screaming has been removed. I was using XfDCloser and assumed that everything had gone to plan. Clearly, there's something to be said for double-checking! Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:35, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

You’re very welcome! XTheBedrockX (talk) 19:37, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

Outline of the Iraq War

XTheBedrockX,

I'm impressed with your creation and development of this outline. Well done!

I've added a link to the outline at:

1. Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines
2. Template:Iraq War
3. Wikipedia:Community portal

You are invited to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines.

There's more info on outlines available at Wikipedia:Outlines.

We also have a template for creating outlines, called Template:Outline generator, which helps get outlines started. The first argument is the subject uncapitalized, and the second argument is the subject capitalized. If provided, those are inserted into the outline automatically. The syntax looks like this:

{{subst:Outline generator|subject|Subject}}.

Keep in mind, that since you have created one hell of a good outline, you don't need to go through the AfC process for future ones. You can create them directly in article space. Be sure to place a {{construction}} tag at the top so that new page patrollers can see that you are working on it. Another option is to start it in a new sandbox in your user space, such as User:XTheBedrockX/Sandbox001, and then move it to article space when you feel it is ready.

It is best to avoid Draft space, because any draft that goes 6 months with no editing becomes subject to deletion.

Keep up the good work. I look forward to reading any future outlines you create.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   05:14, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

@The Transhumanist Thank you so much! I highly appreciate all this. XTheBedrockX (talk) 10:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Election denial movement for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Election denial movement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Election denial movement until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. rootsmusic (talk) 22:20, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

"When the president does it, its not illegal" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect When the president does it, its not illegal has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 30 § When the president does it, its not illegal until a consensus is reached. This also applies to Its not illegal when the president does it ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:29, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

"Wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of iraq I mean ukraine" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of iraq I mean ukraine has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 30 § Wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of iraq I mean ukraine until a consensus is reached. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 03:30, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Edit warring over archiving duration

Your change got reverted. You put your edit back. After coming back from a short break holiday, I find a discussion I started was archived. So I unarchived it and reverted part of your change. You have now edit warred your edit back. I urge you, on this contentious topic talk page, to self revert. Then open up a discussion about the archive duration. Clearly the shortened duration you picked is too short, as a topic that is still ongoing needed to be unarchived. Gain consensus for your change, which two editors dispute. Continued edit warring on this matter is likely to lead to administrative action against you. -- Colin°^Talk 14:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

@Colin This is an oddly hostile response to the archiving of old discussions. I'm just doing what's commonly done on pages that get really frequent discussion (i.e. Russia-Ukraine topics, Israel-Palestine related topics, etc). I understand wanting to keep an older discussion active, but please refrain from trying to WP:THREATEN people for not doing what you want. XTheBedrockX (talk) 14:43, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

What I'm finding "oddly hostile" is that you are happy to revert two other editors to enforce your change to the archiving. Wikipedia works on consensus. You don't have it. Revert and discuss. You are not doing what is "commonly done". We don't "commonly" repeatedly revert other editors to enforce one's own settings. The GCF page is no where near the two topics you mention. This is a talk page that has got 3 archive pages over two years. That's low. If you think fiddling with archive settings is a trivial matter of little concern, then just revert and go find something else to do. -- Colin°^Talk 15:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Controversial topics (which GCF evidently is) often have frequent discussions. Archiving exists partly for technical and readability reasons, per WP:TALKCOND. 7 days is not, in my eyes, an unreasonable amount of time, given the rate at which posts are made on that talk page. XTheBedrockX (talk) 16:28, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

My purpose in coming here wasn't to have an argument with you about what the archive duration should be. Which one of us is "right" or indeed if there is another value (a compromise, or one suggested by someone else) is beside my point. The point is you made an edit on Wikipedia which got reverted by another editor in good faith and who is in good standing. This isn't a vandalism fight or a BLP concern. The question for you then is what to do? The WP:BRD essay outlines an approach many find helpful but it certainly isn't the only one or even the most common (which is mentioned at the very last of the alternatives at the bottom of that page). In that list of alternatives at the bottom, it explains the very limited circumstances where being bold twice might be ok. You were bold three times. That is "hostile". It's why we call it "edit warring". Being right and yet frustratingly surrounded by stubborn idiots does not make it ok. -- Colin°^Talk 08:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to the Outlines WikiProject

XTheBedrockX,

I noticed you signed up on the Outlines WikiProject page and adopted one of our userboxes (which automagically adds you to Category:WikiProject Outlines participants.

Welcome to WikiProject Outlines! It's nice to have you on the team.

In case you are interested in delving deeper into outlines, here are some suggestions:

1) As outlines are lists, list tools are indispensable for working with and on them. AutoWikiBrowser is a powerful multi-function list tool for use on Wikipedia. (It also happens to be an amazing auto page loader and semi-automated search/replace program too). While the page loading and editing features require that you apply for and receive registration in order to use them, the list features work without any approval. You should download it and take a look.

2) Watchlisting all the outlines would be a big help to the project. The easiest way to do this, is to have AWB make a list of all the outlines, and then copy/paste them into the "edit raw watchlist" editor (you'll see its button at the top after clicking on Watchlist on your WP account). Or you could copy/paste most of them from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:PrefixIndex?prefix=Outline+of+&namespace=0&hideredirects=1

3) Watchlist these outline support pages (copy/paste them from within the WP editor):

Wikipedia:Outlines Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Culture and the arts Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Geography and places Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Health and fitness Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/History and events Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Human activities Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Intro Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Mathematics and logic Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Natural and physical sciences Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/People and self Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Philosophy and thinking Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Reference Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Religion and belief systems Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Society and social sciences Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Technology and applied sciences Wikipedia:Contents/Outlines/Topic

4) Monitor outline alerts by placing this on your talk page: <ref>{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Outlines/Article alerts}}</ref>

(Because it is within ref tags, it'll show up at the bottom of your talk page.)

This will display alerts when an outline becomes subject to an administrative workflow, like WP:AfD. It really helps when outline editors know when outlines are being nominated for deletion, etc.

All outlines with our WikiProject banner on their talk pages are automatically monitored by this system. For details of what the system does, see Wikipedia:Article alerts.

X) Wrapping up...

Well, that's all for now. Please let me know what you decide.

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   09:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

UN Resolution revert

Hi. I think I may have selected more text on my mobile than I meant to remove in my recent edit on the UN resolution page. Thanks for catching that.

What I meant to remove, per my edit summary, was this:

The Guardian reported that the US and Israel appeared isolated after only 12 countries joined them in opposing the motion, half from the Pacific islands.

There are two reasons. First, it repeats text from the section immediately above. Second, it is citing an opinion piece by a non-notable journalist. We already detail the slim opposition and numbers for the vote. The text by the Guardian analyst appears to be UNDUE and not informative. The significant issues about the strike are presented elsewhere on the page.

With 1RR I can't go back and fix either the repetition or repeat the smaller edit I tried to do. Please consider correcting the text and only removing my error. Thanks. SPECIFICO talk 19:18, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

@SPECIFICO No problem, honest mistake. I have now removed the op-ed of concern. XTheBedrockX (talk) 19:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Cool. Thanks again. SPECIFICO talk 20:04, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

References

This is overdue

		The Outline Barnstar
		is hereby awarded to XTheBedrockX, for incredible attention to detail in the creation, development, and maintenance of Outline of the Iraq War. Keep up the great work!    — The Transhumanist   01:41, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

@The Transhumanist Thank you so much!!! XTheBedrockX (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

And you have been added to the Outline WikiProject's Hall of Recognition    — The Transhumanist   09:45, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The history of Taiwanese historiography has been accepted

The history of Taiwanese historiography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Lightoil (talk) 02:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anti-Palestinianism during the 2023 Israel–Hamas war, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Democratic Republic of the Congo–Rwanda relations has been accepted

Democratic Republic of the Congo–Rwanda relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Quantum^Realm (meow • pawtrack) 07:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Regency of Algiers

Hello, since you used to assess this article: Regency of Algiers; would you mind doing another review ? Nourerrahmane (talk) 19:13, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

@Nourerrahmane Article definitely looks better this time around. The main thing I'm looking at here is the History (which might need a bit of condensing) and Political status (which might have enough material for it's own article). XTheBedrockX (talk) 02:58, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Burundi–Rwanda relations has been accepted

Burundi–Rwanda relations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 15:59, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disfranchisement after the Reconstruction era, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

Attacks on hospitals

You are wrong. For something to be an attack on a hospital the hospital has to be an intentional target. Using this cat for any incident in which a hospital happens to be hit devalues the category, which would by your logic include pretty well every article about stategic bombing, as well as (doubtless0 several on naval bombardments of land targets.TheLongTone (talk) 14:30, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

@TheLongTone I usually only include that category on a page if the article mentions a hospitals getting attacked in some way during a war. But I reiterate: even an unintentional bombing of a hospital is still a bombing of a hospital. That's still a war crime under international law. If the Germans launch an indiscriminate attack on civilian areas, and they end up bombing a hospital in the process, intentionally or otherwise, that's still pretty clearly an attack on a hospital. XTheBedrockX (talk) 15:11, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

World War II-era "strategic bombings" are already highly questionable in terms of legality, morality or even effectiveness (whether they were Allied or Axis), so I wouldn't exactly call that a strong defense. XTheBedrockX (talk) 15:15, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

The legality or morality or indeed effectiveness of strategic bombing is neither here nor there. The point is that indiscriminately slapping this cat on articles devalues the cat. What is has happened in the Gaza Strip is a proper use of the cat (Is there a cat for attacks on schools, btw). A single bomb falling on a hospital (the WW1 article) is not. The point of cats is to find articles with similarities and using the cat indicriminately makes this difficult. I not that you did not address this point.TheLongTone (talk) 15:23, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

This is why I created subcategories for attacks on hospitals during individual wars (i.e. the Syrian civil war, World War II) for better organization. Also yes, there's Category:Attacks on schools. XTheBedrockX (talk) 15:34, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

The contents on which are meaningful.TheLongTone (talk) 15:40, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Allegations of apartheid by country, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you are copying content from one article to another you are taking responsibility for it. It's essential that you check the sources for wp:rs and ensure that the content does not fail verification or constitute original research in the article that it's being added to. (t · c) buidhe 21:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

@Buidhe This might be an issue with the cites at Human rights in Saudi Arabia, since that's where I copyedited the information from, and I haven't edited that page much. XTheBedrockX (talk) 21:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

The main problem is that you cannot assume that content in other articles is policy compliant or that it is relevant to another article . You have to check before copying. (t · c) buidhe 21:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

@Buidhe That's entirely fair. Sorry about that. XTheBedrockX (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Military units and formations of United Kingdom in the Iraq War

Hello, XTheBedrockX,

Just a reminder that category redirects are not created like article redirects. Please look at the code/template on this page so you'll know how to create a category redirect if you should need to do one again in the future. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:39, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Things named after Charles de Gaulle has been nominated for deletion

Category:Things named after Charles de Gaulle has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Turkish war crimes has been accepted

Turkish war crimes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans (talk) 09:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)