Jump to content

User talk:Umakant Bhalerao/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Speedy deletion contested: Malkeet Rauni

Hello Umakant Bhalerao, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Malkeet Rauni, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Dane talk 17:44, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

@Dane:, Hi Dane, this seems to me a non notable actor. All the sources cited in the article are primary and non reliable. The Google search of him brings nothing much. Neither has he received any major roles in any of the films he has been in and fails WP:GNG, WP:NACTOR. Do you want to start the WP:AfD?

Speedy deletion declined: Jaskham Khatril

Hello Umakant Bhalerao, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jaskham Khatril, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Source infringed upon is not provided and cannot be found. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 20:43, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

@Moneytrees:, I am sorry for not being able to provide the source from where the content was copied. The content of this page was copied & pasted from the website newpakhistorian but was unable to add the link as an evidence of copyright violation or plagiarism issues while tagging as WP:G12 because this website is banned on Wikipedia. But I would make sure to use a URL shortner tool to report such links in the future.

How to add categories to a article page

Can you please tell me how to add category to a Wikipedia article.

The concerned article is a: Biography Indian academic Management educator Simtastic01 (talk) 12:10, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

@Simtastic01:, you can easily add categories to articles using WP:HotCat. You can activate it in the following way: Preferences --> Gadgets --> Editing (just check the appropriate box (HotCat) and finally Save. After that you would be able to add categories at the bottom of articles. You can also add manually. For more details please see help:category.

Thank you very much!

Simtastic01 (talk) 07:11, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

Requesting feedback on Draft

Hello Umakantji, requesting your feedback on Draft: Debapratim Purkayastha PSom (talk) 02:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

@Somali12345:, thanks for your submission to Wikipedia. I looked at your draft for Debapratim Purkayastha and found issues with the the first paragraph. It sounds promotional and needs to be rewritten in a more neutral tone. Also some of the sources cited in the draft article are unreliable and primary. For more info please read WP:RS. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:58, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your feedback and time! I have tried to make some changes to the first paragraph based on your suggestion. Since all the facts mentioned there had multiple sources, I did not think it was a problem. But since as an independent editor you mentioned that, I relooked at the fist paragraph and made some changes. I will also go through the citations carefully, as per your advice, and see if any one of them requires to be replaced. Thanks, again! PSom (talk) 00:21, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Don't deletion don't remove

Hello sir this article film page not don't remove Krodh (2019) Bikram malati in mb (talk) 08:21, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

@Bikram malati in mb: thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia but this short film does not meet the minimum criteria to pass WP:NFILM and the references you added (IMDb and YouTube) are not accepted either. If you think it should not be deleted then please click on the Contest this Speedy Deletion button appearing on the top and state your reasons as to why you think this should not be deleted. I would also advise you to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's policies such as WP:RS, WP:NFILM and how it works so that you can avoid your articles being tagged in the future.

August 2020

I noticed that you tagged Weimador for speedy deletion. I have removed the tag from the page because it does not meet the criterion specified. Please fully read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before tagging pages for speedy deletion. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 12:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

@John B123: Why would I tag a redirect page for speedy deletion under WP:G12? I was about to nominate the one you just moved to draftspace to be speedy deleted under WP:G12 as the content of the article was copied from [1]. Before I could do so you moved the page already from mainspace and the tool tagged redirect page for deletion instead. I think you should also have checked for any copyright issues before taking your actions.

August 2020

So, will you be moving Sam Paul (entrepreneur) back from the draft space? Feel free to copy edit the article - and check the sources. Almost 95% are reputable newspapers. Neutral Fan (talk) 21:38, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Neutral Fan:, thanks for reaching out. the question here is not whether he is notable or not. I am concerned about your editing behavior as witnessed by the notices on your page. Now your recent page Sam Paul (entrepreneur) makes it seem as though you have a COI which you must disclose on your userpage. Please see WP:COI. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:24, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Umakant Bhalerao. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Vedant Birla for deletion

Vedant Birla is a managing director of Birla Precision, a member of the Birla family of India and a son of Yashovardhan Birla and the Birla Group, a large company. Who also have a sufficient number of references

@Ankajtiwari: Notability is not inherited - simply being a managing director and the son of Yashovardhan Birla does not warrant notability. His father, Yashovardhan too has no stand-alone article. Unfortunately none of the source provided in the article address Mr. Vedant directly and in detail. If you have more sources that have in-depth coverage and you believe would help to establish notability you can add them to the article. Please don't forget to sign your comments using tildas --Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Umakant Bhalerao. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. signed, Rosguill talk 22:39, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

Verified facebook page : Kavish Mishra

Hi umakant,

I respect tyour Edits...

I found verified facebook page of Kavish Mishra

Url - https://www.facebook.com/kavishmishramusic/


Its a request you to please help, support and contribute

Regards

Majha Madat kara Trueknockdigital (talk) 10:23, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

@Trueknockdigital: I am sorry but the subject in question does not meet the general criteria of notability. I would suggest you to familiarize yourself with WP:GNG, WP:RS before creating any articles in the future.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:43, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

New Page

Hello I recently create a new page May I Come In Madam a life ok tv serial Kindly Review my page and upload it to google search engines so it appear first.Also add the wiki link of page to remaining Star cast Aristocratic 536 (talk) 16:40, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

@Aristocratic 536: I am sorry but this article was created yesterday only. There are many articles that have been created way earlier than this and need to be taken care of first. So please be patient until it gets reviewed.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok Aristocratic 536 (talk) 20:22, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Your doing a job at AFD.

Tatupiplu'talk 07:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

@Tatupiplu: Thank you so much for your appreciation and encouragement. :)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm The9Man. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Geeta Shakya, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

- The9Man (Talk) 06:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

hey You have given my article in nomination elation Please help me tell you the solution. And if you want you can edit it Help me with it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumarat_Singh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.107.189.220 (talk) 08:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

@150.107.189.220: Yes, I have nominated Sumarat Singh for deletion as he does not satisfy any criterion from WP:NPOL.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sheikh Inzamamuzzaman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tatupiplu'talk 15:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Tatupiplu:, this article was not created by me, but by Tanni3523 (see this [2]), so make sure you are notifying the right person.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi Umakant Bhalerao, You just moved an article to draft space. Please explain the reason why? It seems like you are hiding notices of articles deletion on your talk page, these articles created by you, see here. Please also explain why? CBDDG (talk) 11:36, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi @CBDDG:, yes, I did move Coforge to draftspace as you need to disclose your COI and should put your articles through AFC instead of creating them directly, please read WP:COI.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:00, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
Umakant, i am not anywhere connected to the company. How can you say i have to disclose COI? And you didn't answer my 2nd question. CBDDG (talk) 12:09, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
@CBDDG: You have been asked to declare your COI even earlier which you still haven't. To answer your 2nd question, i have not removed any warning templates from my page as you have here[3]. If you do not have a connection with the organization, then you can go right ahead and move it back to mainspace, but before you do so, you should convince a sysop about your editing behavior.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
If you didn't remove any messages on your talk page then what is this? CBDDG (talk) 14:44, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
I think you have not read my comment carefully.
@Rosguill: I have tried to change the default text with my own a few times but the script does not work and throws an error message. By the way User:Rosguill/Draftify templates these templates are great. It is alright if i use them while draftifying an article?--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
Absolutely, feel free to use them. The error thing sounds concerning though, when exactly does that occur? signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
@Rosguill:Thank you so much for all your help and sorry for the late response. The error occurs when i change the default notification message with a custom text and hit enter. It does not let me go through until i change everything back the way it was. I tried uninstalling and reinstalling the script but that did not fix the problem.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:21, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
That's quite weird, I've never had that problem. Are you including a signature in your custom message? If that doesn't fix the issue, you can move articles to draft space with the regular Move interface, just don't forget to leave a message at the talk page of whoever created the drafted article. signed, Rosguill talk 16:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Rosguill: Seems weird to me also. No, I don't include a signature as the script adds it itself. Will try to solve this problem and will definitely let you know. Thanks again for your great support and guidance:).--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Which draft script are you using? I use Evad's, which I'm pretty sure does not add a signature (although it does include a signature as part of the default text) signed, Rosguill talk 20:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Rosguill: That's right, i use Evad's but I've never had to manually add a signature because this script automatically signs it. Is there a better script?.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
I don't think so, just trying to confirm that we're on the same page. As I said, Evad's script does not automatically sign it, it just includes a signature in the default text. Does it work if you put in custom text with a signature? signed, Rosguill talk 20:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
@Rosguill: I have never tried by adding a signature. Let me give it a try and will inform you.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 20:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi @Rosguill:, I hope you're having a great week. I used one of those templates while draftifying an article and it did the trick. Also figured out what i was doing wrong. Thanks again for your help and support ☺.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Manasichi choodu

Manasichi choodu
what is the issue in manasichi choodu page Vinod1130 (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
@Vinod1130: Thanks for your message. The plot has been copied from [4]. This makes this article open to "Speedy Deletion", see WP:G12. Please paraphrase the plot section to address the copyright concerns and to avoid your page being deleted.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm TheAafi. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Simaran Kaur, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Aafī (talk) 16:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for your great works! ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks so much @TheAafi: :).--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Request for review

Hello,

Could you please review K. Narayan. 

Thanks, Agastya11 Agastya11 (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Agastya11:, I am sorry, I am not an AFC reviewer. As I see you've already submitted the draft which is awaiting review, I would request you to have some patience as there is a huge backlog at AFC.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your recent Move into Draft

This is regarding your recently moved article into draft Razorpay. Umakant why you moved this article in to draft, while the company is notable? I am not a paid user and i have no connection with the company. I created the article from neutral point of view. I also fixed the copied content issue which was tagged by Modussiccandi. And why do you think this article must be submitted through draft while Wikipedia provides option for each autoconfirmed user to publish article through main space? Kindly move the draft into main space. MasscomAlight (talk) 10:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

MasscomAlight No, the article in question has not been written from a neutral point of view and contains promotional content and peacock terms. Please read WP:NPOV. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. The sole purpose of it is to create promotional-free articles without being engaged in WP:COI and undisclosed paid editing. Since you have not contributed with neutral point of view, gives impressions of your promotional editing. I have noticed you have previously created an article for a fintech company which raises concerns about your editing behavior. It again sounds so promotional that it might have qualified for WP:G11. The article has also been tagged with a UPE and COI which you have not addressed yet, neither did you respond to the COI warnings on your page. You can certainly create pages in mainspace but not the ones in which you have a COI as per WP:COI.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hi Umakant Bhalerao. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group. Please check back at WP:PERM in case your user right is time limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page. In addition, please remember:

  • Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
  • You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
  • If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
  • Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page. Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 19:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

We need YOU!

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Unregistered editors cannot create articles on Wikipedia, but they can use the articles for creation process to submit drafts that registered editors can either accept and publish or decline. WikiProject Articles for creation is looking for experienced editors who want to partake in this peer review process. If you have what it takes to get involved, then please take a look at the reviewing instructions. To discuss specific AfC reviews, do so freely on the designated talk page.

There is currently a backlog of over 3600 drafts (0 very old).

If you know an editor who may be willing to help out, please use the template you are currently reading {{subst:WPAFCInvite}} to draw attention to this WikiProject. Many hands make light work!

Hatchens (talk) 02:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for your invitation Hatchens but i am currently working on NPP Wikiproject and trying to help clean out the long backlog. I know the backlog in AfC is already horrifically large. Will give it a thought.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:01, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Umakant Bhalerao, I'm rooting for you! - Hatchens (talk) 03:39, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
@Hatchens:, I appreciate you for that. By the way, you're doing an excellent job at AFC and AFD, keep the same up!!.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:14, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

New Page Patrol December Newsletter

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

A chart of the 2020 New Page Patrol Queue

Year in review

It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.

Rank Username Num reviews Log
1 DannyS712 bot III (talk) 67,552 Patrol Page Curation
2 Rosguill (talk) 63,821 Patrol Page Curation
3 John B123 (talk) 21,697 Patrol Page Curation
4 Onel5969 (talk) 19,879 Patrol Page Curation
5 JTtheOG (talk) 12,901 Patrol Page Curation
6 Mcampany (talk) 9,103 Patrol Page Curation
7 DragonflySixtyseven (talk) 6,401 Patrol Page Curation
8 Mccapra (talk) 4,918 Patrol Page Curation
9 Hughesdarren (talk) 4,520 Patrol Page Curation
10 Utopes (talk) 3,958 Patrol Page Curation
Reviewer of the Year

John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.

NPP Technical Achievement Award

As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.

Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271

To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here

18:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank You!

Hello! Thanks for tagging my article Alexandria (rabbit) for needing some categories. Totally forgot about adding those. DestinationFearFan (talk) 18:50, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

You're welcome @DestinationFearFan:. You can also add categories using automated tool WP:HotCat. Please read this if you want to know how to enable it.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 19:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith

Hello Uma, thank you for marking the article Priya Anjali Rai for speedy deletion. That was a good thing since it has already been deleted three times. However, it was not necessary to assume bad faith on the part of the editor who created it. Please remember that assuming good faith (WP:AGF) is a fundamental principle on Wikipedia.

As they wrote in reply to your template message at user talk:KyloRen3#December 2020, they created the article in good faith. Indeed, there were a number of needed articles they created at the meetup they linked to, none of them with any connection to a “financial stake”, so the warning template was clearly not appropriate.

Of course, mistakes do happen, but when they do, one should own up to them. The least one can do when making bad faith assumptions about other editors is to listen to their answer. It's not clear whether you listened to the other editor, or why you didn't reply to them and apologize for your mistake, especially as the editor you warned had the courtesy to ping you. ◅ Sebastian 19:37, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

SebastianHelm Sorry for the late response and my serious apologies for assuming bad faith. I've responded on their talk page. Thanks so much for taking the time to write here and give feedback.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:31, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Artist sort

Hi! FYI, the artist's deletion sort is not for musicians. It is specifically for visual artists (painters, sculptors etc). Possibly (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

@Possibly: My bad. Thanks for pointing it out :).--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Review Delayed Draft:Anwar Shereef

Hi there, really impressed with your talk page and rewards. you are doing a great great job, as a beginner it is always an inspiration. Good work. Anyway I am writing this regarding a Wikipedia submission which you have moved to draft a month ago, when I was editing the article in the main space, So I completed the article as draft and submitted 29 days ago. Didn't get reviewed yet. Could you please proceed it further ? Thank you :) Onmyway22 (talk) 06:24, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

@Onmyway22: Thanks for writing to me and apologies for the delay in response. I went through your draft and the subject still doesn't meet any of the criteria given in WP:NACTOR. He has mostly portrayed supporting and minor roles in Malayalam films and his next film as a lead actor is not even come out, so it is clearly a case of WP:TOOSOON. I'd let it be in the draft itself until the notability is gained. But now that you have already submitted it for a review, wait for someone to review it. I am not an AFC reviewer and cannot review your article.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:03, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
@Umakant Bhalerao: Thanks for the response :) Onmyway22 (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

You moved a copy of this article from article space to draft space. It has been re-created in article space. You might want to take another look at it to see if it is now ready to stay in article space. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:44, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon: Thanks for bringing it to my notice. Will see if this one has enough sources added and the subject passes notability ceriteria.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Vinayak Nath

Dear umakant bhalerao, I appreciate your review but I think you haven't checked reference and fact properly before adding a speedy deletion tag on this page. I would like to give some points which are given below- 1- I have given 4-5 national-level government website for reference 2- media reference which I have provided they are well-known publishers in the country 3- In the Indian region, he is on Google trends also. 4- In The start-up ecosystem, he is a very well-known personality and recognized and awarded by many state govt. References already have been added. If you are talking about notability so already provided many numbers references which include government websites, national-level organizations, and many national-level media coverage. Now I would like to ask what are the parameters should be according to you for being notability on Wikipedia? It is completely ok that you reviewed this page, but before adding a deletion page tag you should understand the industry and the subject. I would request you kindly remove this tag. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pooja Shree Gaur (talkcontribs) 06:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Pooja Shree Gaur: Thanks for reaching out to me. Let me make things clear first. I have marked it for Articles for deletion (AfD) rather than speedy deletion. AFD is a place where people debate about whether or not an article should be deleted. You could also partake in the discussion by clicking here and put forward your arguments there. Now let me explain to you why i nominated your page for deletion, because the sources are mere mentions and profiles on various platforms which do not amount to establishing notability. In order to meet the general notability guideline, "a topic has to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and As mentioned above, the news sources you have provided mention the subject in passing and those profiles [5][6] are not considered as independent coverage. This page has been deleted even before due to lack of non trivial coverage. I still can't see any independent sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. The subject fails WP:GNG--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 10:07, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@Umakant bhalerao: Thanks for clearing your point of view on it. I would like to discuss with you that 'Notability' varies everywhere. It completely depends on the perspective of the domain where we are talking about. It's an encyclopedia, not a web magazine where we can add only those who have top 10 or top 100 things we can list only... who have media coverage in large quantity.

In encyclopedia Category to category things change and criteria of notability also change.... for example, a person who won the national-level award, is added by editors in Wikipedia because that awards itself stands for the notability of that person. That person gets only one-day of media coverage. where on the other side artist, celebrities get their notability from media coverage. The same happens in the matter of government officials or bureaucrats. They get their notability because of their position or their contribution ... the only thing is that we have to provide the reference from few reliable sources. (Reliable source does not mean to the quantity of coverage in media only ) That is why I added the Government website as a reference for the information which I have mentioned on the page. Now let's talk about other references... He is a corporate personality and National jury in awards event which is conducting by direct Government of India. That's why I have chosen his page to add to Wikipedia. Also, he has coverages many times on national-level media houses... still, if you have any issues with notability you should use the notability tag instead nominate this page for deletion. I would again insist you kindly withdraw your nomination for deletion.

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

  • :)

Onlyaccuratesources (talk) 18:37, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Undeletion request for Vikram Mastal

Dear Uma, I would like to request review and restoration of the page Vikram Mastal. Your view was the actor is not a notable one and he has only one big project to his credit. This is not true. I have mentioned many big ventures of him and cited proper reference. Even after that the page was deleted. He is quite a notable actor and I think he deserves a space in wikipedia. There are many actors much less notable than him has wikipedia pages. I think the page Vikram Mastal should be restored. Please see to it. Thanks.

Phoenix0910, Sorry, i am not an administrator and cannot undelete a deleted article/page, you probably would need to contact the deleting admin for that because the article was deleted after a discussion took place. And i would suggest you familiarize yourself with Wikipedia guidelines such as WP:NACTOR and WP:COI before you place an undelete request there and please do not attempt to circumvent the deletion discussion by recreating this article under a different name as you did here. If you wish to preserve the article, please address the concerns raised at the deletion discussion or get in touch with the deleting admin.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:32, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Request on 07:41:41, 11 February 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Moonsane


Dear Umakant Bhalerao Kashmiri persons of eminence are highly underrepresented on Wikipedia, and I am, in my own free time, working to improve or create missing pages. Request you to withdraw your deletion, because you should be encouraging new Wiki editors from underrepresented backgrounds, not discouraging them. I have worked a lot on the article, as I am also learning how to edit. I have no conflict of interest. I am of Kashmiri origin and I am trying to include more information about Kashmiri people on Wikipedia. As I am new, I would request you to show more patience. You are welcome to give feedback and suggest changes, but please withdraw this hasty deletion.

Moonsane (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Moonsane, I am sorry if you feel i am discouraging you i am not. I am just trying to help you by providing feedback on how to improve your draft. Secondly, I have not nominated the draft for deletion and have just declined it because it still reads like an advertisement to me. Its good that you acted on the feedback provided by Fences and windows and removed the peacock terms and puffery but it still needs work. The draft still sounds promotional and cannot be accepted in its current form. Please familiarize yourself with WP:NPOV. Wikipedia is not a place for advertising. The sole purpose of it is to create promotional-free articles. Could you explain where you got those images from? You have uploaded them as your own work. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Umakant Bhalerao, thank you for engaging. I have answered the question on my talk page. Have provided links to both images. Moonsane (talk) 06:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Moonsane

Draft:SHELX declined CSD

I have given a very broad rationale on the draft's talk page. In general with a draft such a this one I see it as a matter of timing when nominating for CSD as an advert. If I believe that it can be salvaged I do not CSD. I allow the time to pass. This is very much a personal preference. I often try to encourage the editor. That does not always happen. That depends on my mood. Fiddle Faddle 17:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi Umakant Bhalerao. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

  • Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
  • Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
  • Rollback should never be used to edit war.
  • If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
  • Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — Newslinger talk 17:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Lucy Komisar page

I am Lucy Komisar. The writer says I advocated attack on lesbians. This is a lie. And it is libelous. Please so not put this section back or Wikipedia is also guilty of liable. I don't care who is quoted. It is a lie. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.227.129.151 (talk) 17:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hello, how do I happy for Auto Patrolled ?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DasSoumik (talkcontribs) 21:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

DasSoumik, You are not eligible for it yet. The auto-patrolled flag is usually granted to trustworthy people who create lots of articles and are well versed in Wikipedia guidelines. You don't seem to be that active in the creation of new articles as you have created only four articles since you joined in December. I noticed one of the articles you have created (Simron Upadhyay (Actress)) doesn't meet out notability guidelines for biographies and has been deleted several times[7]. Please do not attempt to circumvent the deletion discussion by recreating this article under a different name and workaround for original tile instead. I have marked it for deletion as it's been created against consensus and still doesn't fulfill the notability criteria for an actor. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:47, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello Umakant Bhalerao, thank you for your information. Simron Upadhyay was deleted for few times and I didn't knew how I can create this page again so I tried different name. So if i have done any mistakes then I am really sorry for that. Next time I'll keep in my mind. Thank you for your time.

Maria Straub

Hi there. Thanks for reading the article I started just a few minutes ago on Maria Straub. Please slow down with your tagging. I'll add link to other articles in the next 30-60-90 minutes. Right now, I'm expanding it. --Rosiestep (talk) 05:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Rosiestep, I was using an automated tool, AWB, that found your article to be orphaned and tagged it. I am sorry, i was not aware that you were still working on it. Please feel free to remove the tag after you have linked the article to other Wikipedia articles. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 2015 Yobe gubernatorial election

Hi Umakant Bhalerao

Please remove the tag from article and i will change it and tell me why you do that User:Umakant Bhalerao (Aliyu shaba (talk) 11:00, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Aliyu shaba, Thanks for reaching out. The content of this article appears to have been copied from [8] and therefore i have marked it for deletion under WP:G12. Please rewrite the article to address these concerns. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:28, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

I will do that but don't delete it User:Umakant Bhalerao and now please remove the tag from article

(Aliyu shaba (talk) 11:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Aliyu shaba, Sorry, i am not allowed to take that tag off until you fix those copyvio issues. I cannot delete your article as i am not an administrator. I have just nominated it for deletion which will be reviewed by the deleting admin. Please remove copyrighted content and rewrite the article to avoid your page from being deleted. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

you can go and check it User:Umakant Bhalerao [[9]] I fix it i want to summit it but he didn't summit until if you remove the tag please remove it now (Aliyu shaba (talk) 13:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Aliyu shaba, It has nothing to do with the tag. You can directly post your content under the tag. I don't see any changes done yet. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:11, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi User:Umakant Bhalerao Now am summit it you can go and check it [10] don't forget to from to remove the tag from article (Aliyu shaba (talk) 13:39, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion of Jyll Bradley

Thank you for reviewing my page on artist Jyll Bradley. I am just letting you know I am contesting the deletion, as Bradley is a notable British artist, and as it says on the Criteria for Speedy Deletion page,'If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text written from a neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion.' I followed a noted format for biographies of this kind, but will re-write as necessary. Which parts did you find to be promotional in particular and I will re-write them? Thanks, User:Edinart — Preceding undated comment added 23:13, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Edinart, Sorry for the late response, the tag has got removed by someone. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Help

Hope you are doing good, I just created the article on wiki named as Mutahir Showkat I have got a deletion tag on the article because this article was created by some user before who has spoiled the name Mutahir Showkat as this person is notable you can check about this person on the notable sources he meets all the criteria’s of notability please help to get this article stable thank you Nurupa (talk) 12:42, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Nurupa, I think it was correctly tagged for deletion as the subject doesn't seem to meet our notability requirements and was deleted just a month ago. Furthermore, the article is not written from a neutral perspective. Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. The sole purpose of it is to create promotional free articles without being involved in WP:COI. I would suggest you familiarize yourself with basic guidelines including WP:GNG, WP:RS, and WP:COI. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:02, 24 March 2021 (UTC)


Umakant Bhalerao I might have/had made some mistakes while creating this article please help me out do some possible grammar changes edits in the article which will make it to look neutral I don’t have any kind of bad intentions or I don’t want to hurt anyone but there are some persons who are jealous of Mutahir Showkat I guess haters we can call them they are trying to put this article down so please help me out do the possible changes as much as you can thank you
Fixing promo language alone is not going to help. The main concern here is notability, you would still need to provide more sources that are independent and reliable to show notability of the subject.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:45, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Badi Doooor Se Aaye Hum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:28, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

CommanderWaterford, I have not created this article. It's by Vyom420. Please message the proper user. By the way, i'd moved the article to draftspace a while ago requesting redirect to be speedy-deleted as WP:R2 and that's what you seem to have tagged for deletion under A1. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:43, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Umakant Bhalerao. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! ~Swarm~ {sting} 02:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)

Rejection of Nabhit Kapur's draft

I am aware of this fact that Wikipedia don't accept promotional articles. I have changed the professional section and deleted some lines which looked like promotional. Kindly have a look again and let me know your views.

Please guide me again if any content looks like an advertisement in the professional life section. It would be easy for me to rewrite and then submit for review.

Looking forward to your valuable response.

Thank you Umakant Bhalerao Rajveer90 (talk) 14:04, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, I ran an eye over the draft and it looks better. You need to resubmit it for another review. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:48, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


Oh! Great. Thank you so much Umakant Bhalerao

I am submitted it again for review. Can you have a look on this and review it if possible.

Appreciate your help. Umakant Bhalerao Rajveer90 (talk) 16:51, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, thanks for resubmitting the draft. I will leave it to another reviewer to take a look. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:21, 19 March 2021 (UTC)


Hello Umakant Bhalerao

How much time it usually takes to review the draft? As I have changed everything that you mentioned and now it looks better.

Looking forward to your valuable response. Rajveer90 (talk) 22:45, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, As of today there are 5,260 drafts awaiting review. These drafts are not reviewed in any specific order so it can take a few short days or up to a couple months. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:28, 22 March 2021 (UTC)


Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

I hope you're doing well!

I had changed whatever you mentioned so why it is taking time to re-review the draft. I know there is no specific order but the drafts which are meeting all criteria should be reviewed.

Kindly help me in this as you declined the draft. I followed all the instructions and re-submitted for re-review few weeks back. Have a look on it an approve it if it's meeting all criteria.

Looking forward to hearing from you.

Rajveer90 (talk) 20:35, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

User:Muhammad Ahmad Jutt

You have tagged this editors userpage for deletion as being a hoax. I cannot see why, and would appreciate learning your reason for so tagging.----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Anthony Bradbury, yes, because they have added several misleading user boxes on their user page which is not in line with user page policies. For example although they are not an AfC reviewer, they put {User AfC} which reads "this user is a participant in AfC." This was done to trick people into accepting their submissions. They have a long history of sock puppeting and been involved in promoting M.Zaid. The draft they created was blatantly a hoax as all references they inserted were about a different person with a similar name. They have created this article under several titles and they were all deleted as WP:G11 and WP:A7.
I probably shouldn't have tagged their user page for deletion and should have just removed those misleading templates. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 06:33, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
I was not criticising, just seeeking information. Your action is clearly correct. ----Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:47, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

Justice R Subbiah Page recomended for deletion

Thank you for your valuable sugesstions. If it is a Copy Right Violation then the same should be deleted as per Wikipediapolicies. I Agree. I have one request. Instead of deleting the entire page, give me one chance to delete the Copy Right violated portion from the page. can it be possible? --A.R.V. Ravi (talk) 17:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Justice R Subbiah Page recomended for speedy deletion

I realy appriciate your sugesstion for the speedy deletion of Copy Right Violation. It is the Policy of Wikipedia. I resquest one sugesstion. should the entire page is to be deleted. Or one chance may be given to delete the relevant Copy Right Violation only instead of entire page. if it is possible please suggest! --A.R.V. Ravi (talk) 17:36, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

A.R.V. Ravi, Unfortunately, your article has been deleted due to copyright violations. Over 90% of its text was copied from the source i highlighted while marking it for deletion. You should be writing articles in your own words rather than copy pasting from other sources. Please see WP:COPYVIO. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:33, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Yes. I agree 100%. For creating the page in the same name Justice R Subbiah without any Violations, could you please lend your support? please.. --A.R.V. Ravi (talk) 08:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Request on 15:09:50, 1 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Darshan Singh Writer



Darshan Singh Writer (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

I STRONGLY CONDEMN THE WIKIPEDIA EDITORS ATTITUDE AND LACK OF KNOWLEDGE

I QUIT WIKIPEDIA

THERE IS LOT MORE TO DO THAN REQUESTING AND PLEASING AND SUBMITTING TO THIS GROUP OF ..

Darshan Singh Writer, You should try to understand why your draft is being declined and work to address those concerns. I see your draft was initially declined as "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article." The sources you have listed are largely about a film that she produced, rather than herself and mention her in passing. The draft also has a bunch of primary and non reliable sources (e.g. IMDb). IMDb is not considered a reliable source as it can be edited by anyone, nor is Bookmyshow. In order to meet the general criteria of notability, a person has to have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Since the second submission was done without addressing the above issues i had to decline it. I would suggest you familiarize yourself with basic Wikipedia guidelines such as WP:RS, WP:GNG...etc.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:38, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Why Nabhit Kapur draft is not reviewed yet

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

I hope you're doing good!

You declined the draft three weeks ago and then I changed everything and re-submitted for the review. You checked it and said it looks fine. But still it is not reviewed yet. When everything is fine then why it is taking so much time?

Can you have a look and update the draft if possible.


Thank you in advance. Rajveer90 (talk) 05:56, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, Do you have any connection with the subject? Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Thank you for replying.

No, I dont have any connection with the subject. I know Wikipedia's guidelines. We cannot make articles of those people whom we know. It is against Wikipedia guidelines.

It's just I wanted to know why it is taking so much time when everything is fine.


Rajveer90 (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, Where did you get his picture from? you have uploaded it as own work. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:28, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Umakant Bhalerao, I got this picture from on of the event held in Adharshila's. He is renowned psychologist from India and does multiple events in various colleges.

Rajveer90 (talk) 15:39, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Rajveer90, Even if it looks fine, it does not necessarily mean it should have been reviewed by now. The reason it may have not been reviewed yet because of the backlog at AfC. There is a lot of drafts waiting for review for over a month. I would request you to keep patience. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:32, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Umakant Bhalerao, Thank you for the reply. I will wait for it. Rajveer90 (talk) 18:12, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

On your tag

What is a contents you find as copyrighted. In my article Salem Metropolitan Area - TamilNadu ? தனீஷ் (talk) 07:59, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

தனீஷ், I have provided the link of the website from where the content has been copied. Please click the view copyvio report link in the CSD notice at the top of the page. The report shows a large portion is copied from other sources. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. தனீஷ் (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Not delete CH Centre non profit organization

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Not delete This page is not unambiguously promotional, because this article non profit organization and humanitarian organization Reference link below >> https://m.timesofindia.com/city/kozhikode/kozhokide-bus-operators-to-donate-their-may-17-earnings-to-medical-college-ch-centre/articleshow/69306121.cms

User:msp7com 6:28, 2021 April 27 (UTC) Msp7com (talk) 12:58, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Hiroki Aiba

I have a question: why did you move Hiroki Aiba to draftspace? The article has existed since 2006 and the subject is notable. Just because there are some issues with the writing doesn't mean it should automatically go to draftspace, especially without any prior discussion raised on the talk page. lullabying (talk) 01:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Lullabying, Just because an article has existed for years doesn't mean it merits an entry. There are piles of articles that were deleted after a decade also simply because they were not meeting the current notability requirements. I don't know whether or not he is notable as i have not checked online references. The reason i moved this page into draft was because it severely lacks independent references and needs to be edited to conform to Wikipedia's WP:NPOV. Out of three sources cited, the first link is a profile, the second reference is a link to a Japanese Wikipedia page (his Alma mater), and the third one mentions him passing, so none of these are reliable/independent of him and establish notability. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:50, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
It would have been nicer if you did check the online references before doing so or at least brought it up on the talk page before doing so. He's covered in Japanese mainstream media, such as Oricon (link), Natalie (link), and Anime News Network (link), as well has having starring roles in several musicals and TV dramas. lullabying (talk) 15:59, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
Lullabying, The article had been tagged for additional sources for over two years and the issue is not resolved yet. I don't think a discussion is needed now. Its one of the core policies of Wikipedia that all articles be written from a neutral point of view and cited to reliable sources. Look at the Career section, its entirely unsourced and the three cited sources are not even reliable. He may be a notable actor and therefore i instead of AfDing it moved to draft so anyone willing to improve the article can do so. Nevertheless, I will get around to checking out the links you provided and the ones available online and will try to improve its sourcing. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 11:36, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
I disagree with having it moved to draftspace. While there are issues with sourcing they could be worked on, by putting it in draftspace, the article is at risk of being deleted for inactivity if no one works on it. AfD or AfC are good venues to ask for draftification but I did not see any discussions about it raised. lullabying (talk) 18:24, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
Lullabying, I have moved it back to article space as per WP:Drafts. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:33, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Thank you. lullabying (talk) 19:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion: Probe Group

Hello Umakant:

I am writing in response to your mark for speedy deletion of the Probe Group Wikipedia page that I recently submitted. Can you provide more details about what makes you feel that the page is warranted for deletion and how I might fix the page to improve it? It details information about one of the largest global companies based in Australia, with locations in five countries, and I believe I have written it in a neutral tone with references from a number of major news sources (ABC News, Yahoo! Finance, Australian Financial Review, Deal Street Asia). The company has acquired several smaller companies, at least one of which currently has a Wikipedia page. I look forward to your response. Thank you for your time. Buzzers1 (talk) 12:29, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Buzzers1, Sorry for the late response, I had marked it for speedy deletion as it read like an advertisement and needed to be edited to conform to neutral POV policy, particularly the lead and Expansion and extension. The page was deleted even earlier due to advertising. Please bear in mind Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion. The sole purpose of the site is to create promotional-free pages. Would suggest you give a read-through the WP:NOT. Good luck. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 08:15, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

Hey Bhalerao! I had linked the Santhosh Damodharan article to all the movies he has produced. Could you please check, and if satisfied remove the orphan tag? Thanks! — JosephJames 12:36, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Josephjames.me, Removed. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi - just a gentle heads up; you accepted this article, but the image contained has been lifted from Twitter, there is no evidence whatsoever that the image is the editor's own work as claimed. I have marked the image for speedy deletion at Commons. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 13:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing and taking action, Goldsztajn. Just want to clarify one thing here, when i accepted this draft and moved to article space, the image was not there. It was added by the user afterwards, see [11]. Since the article is on my watch-list, i also saw when they had uploaded the image from Twitter claiming it to be their own work and was about to mark that for deletion myself. I am glad you took care of it. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:22, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Apologies for my misunderstanding, I should have checked the article history more closely! Kind regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 23:13, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Regarding my draft which I have uploaded for review

Sir why You have declined it Nitikeshthakur (talk) 10:39, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Nitikeshthakur, because she does not satisfy any criterion from WP:NPOL. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 13:54, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Review Diana Berrent

please clarify your removal of www.survivorcorps.com/story - Diana is the Founder. https://www.survivorcorps.com/leadership Every single external link supports the creation of Survivor Corps.. it is her official website.. please advise, am confused. thanks Skiman514 (talk) 03:37, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Skiman514, While its great that you want to add content to the draft about "Survivor Corps", the content you have added is copyrighted from https://www.survivorcorps.com/. If you scroll down to the bottom of the page, there is clearly a copyright notice "All rights reserved" which means you cannot cut and past the content onto Wikipedia unless you have a permission from the copyright holder. You need to reword the section in your own words or have to have a permission from the copyright owner to reuse it on Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia can not accept copyrighted material taken from other websites and such additions will most likely be deleted. You may refer to her website as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. I hope this answers your question. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)

Inappropriate template

Inappropriate template
Thanks for page curation template. Please improve the page in lieu of pasting message of curation. I love to be honest (talk) 15:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
@HariSinghw: You will need to be more specific, which article have i placed an inappropriate template on?.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 15:30, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
I presume you are referring to the page you created at Sumer Singh Yadav. The tag (orphan) was correctly placed as the article has no links from other Wikipedia pages. I have gone ahead and removed the template after linking it to Jagan Nath University, NCR. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:16, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for tagging Rustem Umerov for deletion. Also, I would like to ask you to tag Draft:Rustem Umerov for deletion as well. I need to double-check some issues and then will upload it again. --Yarko (talk) 11:44, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Yarko, Both the pages have been deleted per your request. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 17:18, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
Many thanks! --Yarko (talk) 17:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Contesting speedy deletion (Thailand Foundation)

Dear Umakant Bhalerao,

I'm writing to address your concern regarding the speedy deletion of Thailand Foundation due to the alleged copy rights violations. First, it is never in my intention at all to plagiarize the statements from the website, but I believe it will best capture the visions of the key persons to directly borrow the texts in their originality, with explicit direct quotation marks, from the official source.

If I should like to maintain the disputed sections of the article, would you please suggest me if there is anything I can do? Is there a specific wiki tool that I should use when I do direct quotations?

Sincerely yours, Adersons

--Adersons (talk) 11 June 2021

@Adersons: I don't know if you have looked at the copyvio report that i had attached to the page, a huge chuck of the text was lifted directly from www.thailandfoundation.or.th. While you can use the website as a source of information, you are not allowed to copy paste content that are copyrighted onto Wikipedia.

Is there a specific wiki tool that I should use when I do direct quotations?

I am not aware of any such tool but would suggest you read through WP:QUOTES for the usage of quotes. Regards.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 05:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy.

Hello there Umakant thanks for your concern about an article written by me it's about very famous YouTuber and Media Personality "Techno Gamerz", and I have gone through all the instructions mentioned by you and have cited many references and I think this page should not be deleted because it's about one of the biggest Indian Gamer and YouTuber and I think he is very notable and I humbly request you to please remove this tag also I want to tell you that last time when this page was created by someone else and it lacked information but this time I have gone through all the instructions thoroughly, And about reliable sources so I just want to tell you that many reliable newspapers and websites have published many articles about Techno Gamerz for example-The Indian Express, The Economic Times and Ani News etc. Thank you very much for your time. Yours Sincerely Pranay Dongre 27 Pranay Dongre 27 (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Pranay Dongre 27, While he has a large fan base on YouTube, it counts for nothing towards notability if reliable source coverage isn't there to support the article. I have witnessed many articles being deleted despite the fact that they had a huge fan following. So, it's not a criteria for inclusion in Wikipedia. Now let's go over the sources you have pointed to one by one. The first article (The Indian Express) is nothing but an announcement of a music video he featured in and doesn't talk about him in depth. I see the Economic Times nowhere in the article. As far as ANI is concerned, it's clearly a PR piece which is neither reliable nor independent. If you present three independent sources that have indepth coverage, i will surely withdraw my nomination. Regards.Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Okay sure Umakant I respect your requests and I have cited 3 references that are very reliable and should fulfill your requirements the first one is Reference no.1 (Republic World) the second one is Reference no.5th (India.com) and the third one is reference no.9th (Business Standard.com) thank you very much for your time and I hope this nomination should be released the reason is because no one can't refuse his notablity and his popularity which is spread all over the internet. Yours Sincerely Pranay Dongre 27 (talk) 11:44, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

The first two articles are about how many subscribers he has and how much money he makes from YouTube videos. They do not offer indepth coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. While the third link is a press release which i have explained in my earlier comment above is not considered as a reliable source. I would highly suggest you read through WP:RS and WP:INDEPENDENT for help on what qualifies as a reliable source. Best of luck. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:57, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Abhilasha Will

Hey Friend Umakant let me know why this " Malalasekara English-Sinhala Dictionary " article is going to be deleted, please consider — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhilasha Will (talkcontribs) 07:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Abhilasha Will, because you have copy pasted non-free content from https://www.encyclopedia.com/. If you scroll down to the bottom, there is clearly a copyvio notice "All rights reserved". Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:03, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

hello Sir

This person has a page on Wikipedia but this person has worked as a cinematographer in one of the movies https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhushan_Wani Waaaari (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Waaaari, Not sure what you are asking, can you elaborate your query? Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:09, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Hatchens. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Adani Cement, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 15:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hey Hatchens, was just wondering why you marked the article as unreviewed? Its perfectly alright to mark an article as patrolled after listing it at AfD, as its fate will be decided via discussion Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol#Articles_for_deletion_(AfD). Another reason of doing so it to eliminate such articles from NPP. It saves time of other editors and helps in reducing the backlog in some ways. Tagging Adani Cement as unpatrolled will result in it being relisted again at NPP. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 09:10, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi Umakant Bhalerao, how are you bro? Thank you for providing the clarity. I apologize for the removal of reviewers' tag. I got the itch when I saw the page at Google Search. - Hatchens (talk) 10:39, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Hatchens, This sounds concerning, AfD'ed pages do not get crawled by Google. Not sure how this one slipped through the net. Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 12:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

Thanks, I had made an error 2x, in completing the page Millie Tunnell, one of which you caught. Maybe a review is in order, my sandbox was full... CaptJayRuffins (talk) 17:10, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Sawai Bhatt

Hello Umakant Bhalerao Thanks for your review on the draft of Sawai Bhatt, I am curious as I have used my all strength of my brain to understand what notability is, Despite of Sawai's having many, Like MANY publications which are in depth written by the byline author and on him in detail, you stated Declining submission: bio - Submission is about a person not yet shown to meet notability guidelines, Can you please explain how this India Today, NDTV, Hindustan Times and MANY like these aren't reflecting notability? Please do not give any WP nutshell statement written on some page, as I have been through them all, I am just super curious that if this is not WP:SIGCOV notability then what is? Thank You Suryabeej   talk 07:06, 6 July 2021 (UTC)

Suryabeej, I would suggest having a look at this as well, which is more important for a singer to satisfy. By the way, i've declined your draft on the grounds of both WP:SINGER and WP:GNG. Being a singer doesn't make him inherently notable. He was just a contestant in a singing show having received some routine coverage for the same and bagged a song after that. As for links you posted above, all coverage is in respect of his participation in that show and do not pass WP:GNG.

Articles for Creation July 2021 Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Umakant Bhalerao:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 900 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

I am game for it.--Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 16:58, 8 July 2021 (UTC)