User talk:Aristocratic 536

Aristocratic 536, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Aristocratic 536! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Help me

Hello I want a help i am a freindly wiki editor i was trying to create a page for May i come in madam serial which i couldnt as i dont know how to Create A wiki page in that Process i create a wrong page where no inf is given kindly correct my Mistakes and Sorry. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 04:59, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that this page is already created. DestinationFearFan (talk) 18:34, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

Hello i need small asistance on how to copy external link or Url to A Tv serial which aires on Hotstar sony live or such kind of apps,So that i can paste external link of the Serial on wikipedia page i recently(2 days ago) created of Life ok Serial May I Come In Madam. Kindly asissts Soon.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 04:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalisation

When you edited Excuse Me Maadam, you capitalised "Succesfull", "Serial" (twice), and "Sequel" when they should not have been.

The Serial is sequel of Succesfull Life Ok Serial May I Come In Madam. Owing to popularity and success of May I Come In Madam the producers of the show launched this Sequel.

When contributing to English Wikipedia, please use English capitalisation standards. Capitalisation is usually used for proper nouns and the first letter of the first word in a sentence. These words were neither. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! Thank u So Much Jellysandwich0. Also i recently expanded the article further more and adding more details in Characters section kindly check that too and correct small gramatic or puntuation erorrors,I will be grateful to u. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 03:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to NDTV, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. SUN EYE 1 05:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i Will take care about that in future. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 05:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rohit Sharma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Prolix 💬 06:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Narendra Modi, you may be blocked from editing. Prolix 💬 06:07, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i Will kept that in Mind from now. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 06:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Narendra Modi. Prolix 💬 08:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I won't do that I was just adding old photo of Modi, Next time I won't do that on Narendra Modi page. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 08:49, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also i was just adding photo not doing any disruption. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 15:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 08:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aristocratic 536, please read the numerous policies and guidelines you have been informed about on this talk page. Edits like this and this violate several of our policies, and you will be blocked or topic-banned if you continue in this vein. Vanamonde (Talk) 04:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will kept that up for Sure anyway Have u fetch Opindia wiki article and Notice In How bad Tone it is written???! Its quite clear Wikipedia is hijacked by left mafias anyway i wont edit this pages from now no need to Block me . I am coming back to my Normal articles of Tv shows,Cricket and movie stars.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 04:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I will kept ur words in Mind. Dont worry Aristocratic 536 (talk) 04:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kohli picture

please discuss any changes to the picture on the article talk page. Your edits are becoming disruptive. Spike 'em (talk) 18:51, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok,I wont change Anyway its impossible to reach consensus on Talk pages,As ultimately the Administraitor do what they wish.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 19:13, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Puffery

Hi there, re: this, in addition to this content containing problematic English structure, this is a neutral encyclopedia, and we're not here to drool over article subjects. We don't present opinions as though they are facts, and just because one outlet praises him, doesn't mean that this is representative of the majority of opinions about the subject. Further, slideshows are poor choices for references, as they are likely written by interns, not by reporters. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Diwali!

Happy Diwali!!!

Sky full of fireworks,
Mouth full of sweets,
Home full of lamps,
And festival full of sweet memories...

Wishing You a Very Happy and Prosperous Diwali.
Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Send Diwali wishings by adding {{subst:Happy Diwali}} to people's talk pages with a friendly message.

Same 2 U Dear😊😊😊😊. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 16:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wasim Akram picture

Sir I have seen your contributions for this page I appreciate it for improvement but please right thing should be in right place. As I mentioned if you desire the previous picture you can add it in Post Retirement section of this article because there it will be suitable but please do not add it in infobox as it is the latest portrait of Wasim Akram. I hope you will now understood.192.142.148.150 (talk) 17:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok If u want this Image u can have i have no problems with that image too It doesnt matter much Image of Ian Chappell is from 1969 It doesnt matter much. I have no problem with what u said,Also main policy of wiki is to Have a clear photo not older than 20 years.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 17:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where did you find this "not older than 20 year" photo policy? I've not seen it mentioned anywhere. Spike 'em (talk) 19:54, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I myself Was informed about that few days back, A editor when i upload photo of Shah Rukh Khan from 2000 they remived saying 20 years old is too old to be uploaded. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 03:03, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality edit

Recently, in the May I Come in Madam? article, you made a big change:

Anup Upadhyay: As Sanjana's father, Chedilal Hiteshi. He use to work as a Peon in Use Me Advertisement Company, however One day he tried his luck and coincidently he got a Lottery and he became Owner of the Company. While wearing Blue Glasses he behaves as a Strict boss,however without Glasses He turns into a Funny Peon who often irritates others. He is Characterless Man who often lusts for Several Women including Sajan's Mother-In-Law. Shama Rathod: As Ramvati, Sajan's Mother-In-Law. She along with his son bhupesh mentally torture Sajan and provoke kashmira that Sajan is having an Affair with Sanjana. Ramvati too like Chedilal is a characterless woman who often lusts out for several Men including Chedilal. She often spell double meaning dialogues about 'Nawab Shab'(her old customer). Deepesh Bhan: As Bhupesh, Sajan's brother-in-law. He work as a Junior of Sajan in Use Me company and often annoys him and blackmail to leak his secrets ,Although Sajan manage to convince bhupesh by bribing him.

You capitalised many words that should not have been: "Peon" (twice), "One", "Lottery", "Owner", "Company", "Blue", "Glasses" (twice), "Strict", "Funny", "Characterless", "Man", "Several", "Women", "Mother-In-Law" (twice), "Affair", "Men", and "Junior". None of these should have been capitalised. These are many mistakes.

People's names should be capitalised. But you wrote "bhupesh" and "kashmira". This is wrong.

English Wikipedia is written in English. Please respect the English language's capitalisation rules.

Jellysandwich0 (talk) 01:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i will do that But please stop removing entire section Aristocratic 536 (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sections full of low-quality writing will be removed. Above you wrote, "Ok i will do that But...". "I" should always be capitalised. Why did you capitalise "But"? It should not have been. Please write correctly. Jellysandwich0 (talk) 15:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

Hello wiki community i desparately need a Help from U recently i upload many Pictures on Wikicommons some of them are Screegrabs i really dont know how much Trouble these can get me into Please delete all my Images From Wikicommon account of mine created with Same account Name, Please do it Soon Its a request and reply soon, I will make suru in Future to not Upload these Kind of Images. Appolgy and Please delete those Images. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me

Hello I am Posting a request Again i desparately need a Help from U recently i upload many Pictures on Wikicommons some of them are Screegrabs i really dont know how much Trouble these can get me into Please delete all my Images From Wikicommon account of mine created with Same account Name, Please do it Soon Its a request and reply soon, I will make suru in Future to not Upload these Kind of Images. Appolgy and Please delete those Images Aristocratic 536 (talk) 10:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aristocratic 536, You can ask for help using this template. Otherwise editors might not read your message. Please can someone help him. Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No one here can do anything about your issues on commons, you need to ask there. Praxidicae (talk) 17:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All uploads deleted. Can I help you with anything else today? --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you need more help with the images at Commons, you can post it at this place. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:06, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Me

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aristocratic 536 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello wiki why I was blocked I am Not a Sockpuppet of anyone i Just do edits on Wikipedia moslty in Good faith and not to Harm wikipedia,Please unblock me Neither i am Using Sockpuppet of Anyone. Aristocratic 536 (talk) 03:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
One More Request Kindly review My Block I Am not using Any Sockfarm can see all my edits and each of them were just in Good Faiths and reverting vandalism Why i Blocked For such Friendly edits???? Its really Horrifying to know such things when u got banned even editng in Good spirit Its a request I am not using any sockfarm Just a normal editor.Aristocratic 536 (talk) 04:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sock puppet. Appeal on your original account via WP:UTRS. We're not going to go through this again. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.