User talk:Tgec17

Tgec17, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tgec17! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This looks like an interesting article, but it needs much more rigorous referencing. The lack of in-line refrencing makes it impossible to track any statement back to the WP:RS it came from. Note that we do not use other wikipedia articles as references. And, please don't embed external links in the body of the article, per WP:EXT

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 20:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century (May 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please review WP:RS, way too many unreliable sources used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:11, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Nobles and Magnates of England in the 13th Century. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 20:28, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arnold II von Isenburg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arnold II von Isenburg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. –User 45 65 41 18:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold II von Isenburg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Arnold II von Isenburg, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 18:31, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich I von Finstingen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Heinrich I von Finstingen, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. EditQwerty (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Draft talk:Arnold II von Isenburg, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. –User 45 65 41 18:46, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of nobles and magnates within Scandinavia in the 13th century moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of nobles and magnates within Scandinavia in the 13th century, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Amkgp 💬 14:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Sealand nobles

The article List of Sealand nobles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks all notability, and contains WP:BLP violations, claiming titles for people without support here or in their own article (Fogle, Stokes).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 07:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Sealand nobles for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Sealand nobles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sealand nobles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Headings at AfD

Please don't using headings to format your messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Sealand nobles. They're messing up the structure of the AfD log for the day.

Also, please don't WP:BLUDGEON the process. Or, if you really are going to, at least sign your messages. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Tgec17

Thank you for creating List of nobles and magnates of England in the 13th century.

User:Scope creep, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Needs tables with a reference per person.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Scope creep}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

scope_creep^Talk 12:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Scope creep}}

Hey so I dont exactly know what you mean by table with a reference to each person. Are you talking about the tables which list of monarchs use like this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_English_monarchs

--Tgec17 (talk) 20:44, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sir John de Chudleigh I moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sir John de Chudleigh I, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mcampany (talk) 02:37, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 02:06, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arnold II von Isenburg

Hello, Tgec17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arnold II von Isenburg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:11, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Heinrich I von Finstingen

Hello, Tgec17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Heinrich I von Finstingen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:12, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Walter de Washington

The article Walter de Washington has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not inherit notability from George Washington, only coverage I found was in genealogies, and it isn't sigcov of him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:17, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walter de Washington for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter de Washington is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter de Washington until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your reverted edit on Stop the Steal

Your edit on the Stop the Steal article was reverted because it goes against WP:UNDUE. Wikipedia is only as fair to opposing view points as reliable sources cover them, and your contribution gives massive undue weight to WP:FRINGE theories. I recommend you familiarize yourself with the linked policies, as well as Wikipedia's Perennial Reliable Sources, and in particular in relation to YouTube Videos, which are not generally accepted as reliable sources as they are not verifiable and are largely anonymously published, before contributing further to this subject; political articles in general are very stingent about reliability of sourcing. Any questions can be brought to myself or any other editor. This is not an official warning, just a note about why your edit was reversed, so you aren't left confused. Builder018 (talk) 05:53, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sir John de Chudleigh I

Hello, Tgec17. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sir John de Chudleigh I".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:43, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Richard Mark Royal

The article Richard Mark Royal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Little coverage in WP:RS and essentially a WP:BLP1E. Knighthood by a micronation does not satisfy any established notability criterion.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kinu ^t/_c 00:10, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Philip of the Crozier-men to Philip Simonsson

Hello Tgec! I saw your note Note: As the author I'd like to mark this page for deletion or merging with Philip Simonsson I was unaware of that article until after I wrote this one. I agree a merge would be appropriate; you can do so yourself following the procedure outlined at WP:PROMERGE. Let me know if you have any questions! BenKuykendall (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century

Hello, Tgec17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endrid Bookling moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Endrid Bookling, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Endrid Bookling moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Endrid Bookling, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:26, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tgec17,

If you want Endrid Bookling in the main space, could you clean it up and make it less likely to be subject to deletion? Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Endrid Bookling for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Endrid Bookling is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Endrid Bookling until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century

Hi — I noticed you moved List of nobles and magnates of France in the 13th century into the main space past the AfC process (but didn't clean up, so it still sits in the queue), with the comment that it "provides basic info". Yes, it does, but do you think it's otherwise ready for publication? And more specifically, do you plan to add references? Thanks, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, references for a list are not essential for Wikipedia as far as I'm aware, however at some point I probably will add references to provide more contextual information for the list. I'd say there are parts of it more or less which are ready and other parts need work but its better if more people can read and add to it because I don't necessarily have the time to do the entire thing myself. --Tgec17 (talk) 18:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

so basically no improvement since I sent it to draft last month. We don’t host unsourced material in mainspace, and sources are fundamental for an encyclopaedia article, not just something you might get around to eventually. You don’t need a separate source for every item on a list, but you do need sources to show that that there is some authority for the list as a whole and it’s not just a piece of original research by you. Mccapra (talk) 18:32, 10 September 2021 (UTC)e[reply]

as far as I'm aware Wikipedia lists don't need sources because they are just lists. But I added a source for Mccapra's sake. --Tgec17 (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well that’s great! Thank you! Except a. Lists do need sources and b. The source you added doesn’t support the article (it’s about Scotland, not France). You’ve clearly done a lot of work on this article and including sources is just “showing your working”. As things stand, we only have your word for it that the nobles and magnates included in your list properly belong there. Do yi7 see the problem? Mccapra (talk) 20:57, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if you look at the source it does support the article in supporting Philip Augustus's styles as king. I'm currently working on the article as we speak, perhaps you should join. After reviewing the guidelines I see that the lead does need to be sited and I will do this soon but it requires more effort then just getting the list done which is currently my priority. --Tgec17 (talk) 21:04, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Excellent article work. scope_creep^Talk 17:36, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of feudal wars 12th-14th century moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, List of feudal wars 12th-14th century, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:02, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Schiff, especially if it involves living persons. Read WP:BLP for restrictions. Your edit is trivial, defamatory, and unconstructive. Zefr (talk) 21:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Asolf of Eastairt

Hello Tgec17,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Asolf of Eastairt for deletion in response to your request.

If you didn't intend to make such a request and don't want the article to be deleted, you can edit the page and remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wakowako (talk) 04:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into List of feudal wars 12th-14th century. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:00, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of feudal wars 12th–14th century for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of feudal wars 12th–14th century is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of feudal wars 12th–14th century until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 22:17, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Knudsen Skarsholm moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Erik Knudsen Skarsholm, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:56, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh of Boves moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hugh of Boves, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Galore of Montigny moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Galore of Montigny, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conrad of Dortmund moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Conrad of Dortmund, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

James de Chudleigh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, James de Chudleigh, is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:20, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Earl of Zealand moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Earl of Zealand. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alvaro Diaz (nobleman) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Alvaro Diaz (nobleman). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the one source cited does not appear to be a WP:RS. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nobility of Castile?

Hi! Re the message above: what makes you think that this might be a reliable source? There's no author, publisher or ISBN number, and it looks like either someone's self-published WP:OR, or else somebody's translation of an authentic Spanish-language source. Can you show otherwise (happy to be shown I'm wrong – again!)? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because it cites primary sources consistently for every entry and even has the quotations in it. Tgec17 (talk) 21:15, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Diego Perez Obregon moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Diego Perez Obregon. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and the one source cited does not appear to be a WP:RS. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rodrigo Álvarez de Asturias for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rodrigo Álvarez de Asturias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Álvarez de Asturias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 22:08, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alvaro Diaz (nobleman)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alvaro Diaz (nobleman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:54, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diego Perez Obregon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Diego Perez Obregon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:55, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User_talk:Liz. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 04:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments like these are completely unacceptable here. Please read WP:CIVIL and WP:NPA. General Ization ^Talk 04:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attack was made. It is a productive piece of feedback for that user who had received much similar feedback but seems to refuse to accept it and is in denial. You have absolutely no business commenting on my page because you are not even related to it at all, I wonder what your problem is. --Tgec17 (talk) 05:25, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to "the arrogance and the ignorance of people like you" with regard to another editor is a personal attack. If you do not understand or acknowledge it as such, then it seems that we have a larger problem to address. General Ization ^Talk 05:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its not a personal attack its an accurate description --Tgec17 (talk) 06:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are not welcome to post on my talk page any longer if you are going to be insulting. And, at least two other administrators agreed with me with one of your articles being speedy deleted and the other being nominated for deletion at AFD. So, maybe you have an incorrect understanding of notability on Wikipedia and the reliable sourcing necessary to verify this notability. I see you are relatively inexperienced at editing so maybe you should review the relevant Wikipedia policy pages including the one on "no personal attacks". Thank you. Liz

Read! Talk! 19:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are certainly not welcome on my talk page either. Those articles are notable and they will be going back up with citations to the primary sources which they are in. I have plenty of experience as an editor on Wikipedia with over 30 articles. You seem like the only thing you do is try to take other peoples articles down. I honestly think that you would be better served creating your own articles or perhaps giving up this hobby because you are not helping anyone and you only cause problems. --Tgec17 (talk) 21:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alvaro Diaz (nobleman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alvaro Diaz (nobleman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alvaro Diaz (nobleman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 04:44, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Count of Kalundborg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Count of Kalundborg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:30, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Álvarez de las Asturias moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pedro Álvarez de las Asturias, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Count of Sarria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Count of Sarria, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:59, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pedro Diaz (nobleman) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Pedro Diaz (nobleman), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Galore of Montigny

Hello, Tgec17. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Galore of Montigny, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.