User talk:Tajotep/Archives/2022 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tajotep. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Welcome!
Hello, Tajotep, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.
Did you know that ...
- ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
- ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
- ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
- ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
- ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- Manual of Style
Contents |
---|
Thanks
Hi Boleyn. Thanks a lot for reviewing my new pages. I come from eswiki, and policies are differente from there and here. How are mi two news articles? Aren't they bad, are them? Sorry if my English isn't fluently. Regards. Tajotep (talk) 21:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Tajotep, thank you for working on English Wikipedia as well. Your creations are good, I've been happy to review them. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 18:32, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks
Hi Lfstevens. Thanks for checking the copyedit of the two first articles I created (A cognitonibus and Ab epistulis). I'm Spanish so I sometimes commit grammar and orthography mistakes. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 13:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- Happy to do so. Cheers! Lfstevens (talk) 21:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Multiple issues in Europa Press
Hi Crisco 1492. Some time ago (2011) you marked the page Europa Press like an article without sources. Now I'm contributing in the article and I added some references. Can you check it and eliminate that template? In particular, how can I correct the notabilty of the article? Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 20:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Tajotep, notability isn't something you "correct". It's either there or it's not. For Europa Press, you'd need at least one (preferably more) reliable, independent source that deals with the subject in-depth. A contemporary newspaper profile, a chapter (or subchapter) in a biography on Reavey, or something similar. Just saying that something exists is not enough for notability. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Modigliani
Hello Tajotep, in the article about "Modigliani" I have changed the name "Modigliani" in one case in "Amadeo Modigliani" because the sentence mentions the painter was the fourth child of his eltern and therefore the brother of several other children with the last name Modigliani. In the next sentence the form "Amadeo" is used, following the same logic. I believe, my change is justified and I would be pleased if you would allow me this small alteration. In case you have a good reason for using "Modigliani" without the first name, I would be grateful if you could explain this to me.Opzwartbeek (talk) 22:36, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Ok, it's my error. I've just looked quickly and I observed which all paragraphs start in "Modigliani", so I supposed that your edit wasn't necessary, but when you left the message I read the info in the section and I realised I was wrong. Sorry for that. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labordeta (talk • contribs)
Your reversions of User:CEpley
I have reverted some of these, and may do more. I have also messaged his talk - he is adding too many books, and making other mistakes. But I don't think his edits amount to WP:BOOKSPAM - these are just the sort of books FR should have, just rather a lot of them. Cheers, Johnbod (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message and thanks for checking my contributions. I'm new on enwiki and I can commit some mistakes. Recently my contribution on "Etruscan history" has been reverted. Since you didn't revert it, I ask you... It's a good edition, or that user is right?. Same to you. Tajotep (talk) 18:47, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- I commented at [[1]] on problems with his edits, but on the whole I think they are better there than not there at all. I'm working through adjusting them somewhat, without having personal knowledge of all these works. that there too. Johnbod (talk) 18:52, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Socrates
The reason why all the years are included is because different sources show different years for birth, which indicates the sources don't agree, which necessitates inclusion of all the years shown by sources, since there isn't agreement. Your criticism, reiterative, is not the correct choice because, if you would like to verify for yourself, the definition of the word you used does not apply to difference but instead to the same thing repeated - [2], [3]. This would therefore allow me to return your edit to the previous version. 23h112e (talk) 20:06, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
- I reverted some part of your edition because if you add three times (at the top of the article, in the infobox person and in the section of "Early years") it's redundant. I never doubt the references, so I added it again. If you want to discuss anything, you can write on the talk. Greetings. Tajotep (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Labordeta (talk • contribs)
Disambiguation link notification for December 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Talavera de la Reina (1936), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ariel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
Nomination of Año/Cero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Año/Cero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Año/Cero until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. RileyBugz会話投稿記録 23:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
A page you started (Fioretta Gorini) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Fioretta Gorini, Tajotep!
Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I have made some minor improvements. Please see the article history and diffs for details.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Bianca Riario (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Rizzoli
- Giovanni dalle Bande Nere (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Giovanni Cavalcanti
- Medjay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to National police
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Law vs. Billy the Kid, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Griffin and Bill Phillips (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
Hello, I'm SteveMcCluskey. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Mexican inventions and discoveries have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You have added links to the phrase "first civilization", which redirects to the article Cradle of civilization, in many articles, which is inappropriate when it merely refers to the "first civilization to...." Would you please edit more selectively in the future and remove the many inappropriate edits that you have made. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:02, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
- On my talk page you said:
- I don't find them inappropiate. "First civilization" is a term, and it doesn't matter where it's accompanied by. In addition, some of the words I linked redirected to "civilization", so I linked to "first civilization". Tajotep (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
- As the Wikipedia Maual of Style makes clear, links are intended to "provide instant pathways to locations … that are likely to increase readers' understanding of the topic at hand." More specifically, it notes that editors should "beware of linking to an article without first confirming that it is helpful in context."
- A link from Alpha Centauri in fiction to "First civilization" does not link to an article that is helpful in understanding "the first civilization to send a colony ship to the Alpha Centauri system." It would be tiresome to give other examples of inappropriate links from your list of contriburions. Please stop this practice of thoughtless editing. --SteveMcCluskey (talk) 02:36, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
- The link to First civilization is indeed misleading in the given context. Talking about the "the first civilization of all civilizations in the game, that does something" is not the same as talking about "The first civilization" here on Earth in particular. Mere fact that words "a" and "b" appear next to each other doesn't mean they should be automatically linked to an "a b" article. It would be sensible to unlink that. Martinjanda (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
- Here is an alternative statement that should help to understand the context: "One of the potential victory conditions involves being the third civilization to discover electricity.". Such statements have nothing to do with the First civilization. Also, being familiar with the game helps to understand the difference. Martinjanda (talk) 13:56, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
- I don't find them inappropiate. "First civilization" is a term, and it doesn't matter where it's accompanied by. In addition, some of the words I linked redirected to "civilization", so I linked to "first civilization". Tajotep (talk) 10:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 01:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Shearonink (talk) 01:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join Women in Red
Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past few weeks. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would like to receive news of our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, just 17.37% of English Wikipedia's biographies).
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Ipigott (talk) 15:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding your name to the WiR mailing list. If you want to become a full member of the project, you should register using "Join WikiProject" in the box on the right hand corner of the main WiR page.--Ipigott (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- And thank for finally deciding to become a member. If ever you need any assistance or run into any problems, please let me know or post a message on the WiR talk page. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding your name to the WiR mailing list. If you want to become a full member of the project, you should register using "Join WikiProject" in the box on the right hand corner of the main WiR page.--Ipigott (talk) 10:41, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 7
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Monro (British Army officer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
"foolishness"
Wikipedia aims to be encyclopedic and its Manual of Style guidelines help it to fulfil that function and avoid becoming a fan site. If you are not prepared to abide by them, you run the risk of having your editing account blocked. Bring the matter up in the Ballerina (2016 film) talk page and I'll make sure an administrator is there to comment. Sweetpool50 (talk) 12:18, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Islamophobia
The tags cannot be removed until the concerns are addressed. What part do you not understand? see Talk:Islamophobia#"...especially when seen as a geopolitical force or the source of terrorism" Al-Andalusi (talk) 19:38, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Feburary 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.
New:
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Captain Phillip a "survival" thriller?
Hi Tajotep. Do you really consider this movie a survival film? Please check/comment/join our discussion with some valuable arguments. Thanks. [[4]] Syncrow (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Reversing an edit
How are you going to revert information off of the EMD MP15DC article that I wrote? I work for the railroad and know more about these Locomotives than anyone else on here. If you don't believe what I wrote. Look it up for yourself. DudleyJJenkins409 (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Tajotep! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 11:07, Sunday, February 4, 2018 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Athena Parthenos
Pardon, but may I ask why you reverted my edit on the Athena Parthenos? The cited article itself uses "26 cubits", which is also what was noticed by Pliny the Elder (according to Mary Beard's The Parthenon, page 40); 26 cubits is also exactly 39 feet. Reversinator (talk) 17:18, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Archived version of IMDb external links
Can you explain why you're replacing external links to the IMDb with archived versions? This prevents people from seeing the latest version of the page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
What's wrong with this? It's just adding an additional fact covered in an existing reference.--217.155.32.221 (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry—apologies. More on article talk page. --217.155.32.221 (talk) 16:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Sorry about franchise
I'm so sorry about franchises! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.77.116.78 (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hercules
Talk about what? All of the Hercules episodes are underdeveloped, overwritten plot summarries without an ounce of real-life world information, lacking any significance or citations. All of these things I just wrote have been written at the top of those articles since 2011. They don't need a discussion. It's a pretty non-controversial merge & redirect. PanagiotisZois (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Sharp-Shooting Twin Sisters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to William Conroy and Guillermo Méndez
- Ricardo Palacios (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to James Hill
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 5
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Sharp-Shooting Twin Sisters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to William Conroy and Guillermo Méndez
- Yginio Salazar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Lincoln Cemetery
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
minecraft: story mode
why do you prefer aired if it wasn't broadcasted on television?204.153.155.151 (talk) 20:50, 5 March 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Escuela de rateros, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mario García and Jesús Gómez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
Valentino Macchi
Hi there, I'm an italian user. I have removed the pic of Macchi you put in his WP pages in italian, french and english. That man is not Macchi at all... you can easily find Macchi on google images, btw he was much younger at that time. Bye --Vergerus (talk) 10:21, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
- As I said, that man you posted is NOT Valentino Macchi at all. Did you check on google images, at least? --Vergerus (talk) 13:25, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, yes, that man on pollanetsquad page is Macchi, when he was 30 y.o. I think. Cheers --Vergerus (talk) 08:50, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
Tonic
Hello. Ive fixed the copyright issue by sending proof of copyright ownership to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. In the following email generated by the WIKI permissions email generator:
I hereby affirm that I, Tonic, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the media work https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tonicbandshot.jpg. I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.
Tonic 2018-03-24
[generated using relgen] — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonicWiki (talk • contribs) 15:23, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Earls of Orford
The removal of my edit has removed much relevant information from the page Earl of Orford, Edward Russell 1st Earl of Orford already has another page with links, this page is generic for all the Earls and you have deleted all their links. Please reinstate. Prawnmob200 (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
April 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or
Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: |
Content removal from talk pages
Just leaving you an FYI that users are allowed to freely remove warnings from their own talk pages. It is allowed. Let me know if you have any questions and I'll be happy to answer them. Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 18:36, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Cite journal
Hey there, judging by recent edits of yours to various Lego video games, you really like to use the {{cite journal}} te plate for citations. Quite interestingly, as it is one of the less commonly used ones. However, I sceptical whether the template is appropriate for content that is displayed online (not in a journal), especially when there is no printed counterpart (e.g. the IGN source you changed on Lego The Incredibles just now). The rendering might not be very different (if different at all), but for alignment's sake, please consider using {{cite web}} for such sources in the future. Cheers! Lordtobi (✉) 22:29, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
List of Order of Charles III recipients
Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page List of Order of Charles III recipients to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you.
Bienvenido, y gracias por contribuir a la página List of Order of Charles III recipients de Wikipedia. Aunque añadió la página a la versión en inglés de la Wikipedia, el artículo no está en inglés. Le invitamos a traducirlo al inglés. En la actualidad, ha sido incluida en las páginas que necesitan traducción , pero si no se traduce en dos semanas, el artículo será incluido para su eliminación. Gracias. wbm1058 (talk) 13:52, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Cook (dog)
Hello Tajotep,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cook (dog) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
EROS message 02:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Sociedad Limitada listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sociedad Limitada. Since you had some involvement with the Sociedad Limitada redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Ammarpad (talk) 04:02, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Nationalities
Catalan and Basque are nationalities. The 1978 Spanish Constitution states "The Constitution is based on the indissoluble unity of the Spanish Nation, the common and indivisible homeland of all Spaniards; it recognizes and guarantees the right to self-government of the nationalities and regions of which it is composed and the solidarity among them all."
Now please stop peddling that falsehood. There's no reason for you to object to these changes unless you have a sinister political motive.ApolloCarmb (talk) 08:00, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:26, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Reverts on Hypercorrection
Hello, Tajotep. I have left a warning for IP User talk:5.41.185.76 not to violate the three-revert rule. They already have reverted multiple times, so if a user from that IP changes the page again without discussion, you may want to bring the edits to the attention of WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring.
You may also want to take care, though, not to violate the rule yourself. In the past I have seen well-intended editors get in trouble for violating the letter of that rule, even when they were acting for the best interests of the project. Thank you for your contributions, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018 at Women in Red
Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Category:Film scores by Spanish composer has been nominated for discussion
Category:Film scores by Spanish composer, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 13:05, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Reply
Disney had released a press release and no actor was established playing Roo. At this point we can’t 100% authenticate who’s playing the character as Disney has yet to announce it. Rusted AutoParts 14:23, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miguel Blesa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gürtel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Aristotle
Please motivate your choice when you undo section. Plato alone is not "one of the most important philosophers of the Western Tradition". In terms of impact and number of studies, Aristotle and Aristotelianism outperform any Platonic tradition by a great deal. At the very least, therefore, it is right to say that they were both very influential. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristotele1982 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mimmo Poli, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giorgio Bianchi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
The Hateful Eight
This is, in my opinion, WP:UNDUE for this page, if you want to have this information published, I'm all for it, but you really think it needs to be on every page with his name ? Put it here Harvey Weinstein and be done with it. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 22:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
May 2018
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 01:04, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Your Ninurta edit
The IP user you reverted was correct; the relief of the bird-headed figure is definitely not Ninurta and I have no idea how it came to be identified as him here on Wikipedia, since that erroneous identification is not found anywhere else to my knowledge. I have replaced it with an image of a relief from Ninurta's temple at Kalhu that almost definitely really depicts him and have provided a citation in the caption underneath the image to a reliable, scholarly source explaining this. --Katolophyromai (talk) 11:50, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Thunderbolt image
Hi Tajotep, thanks for getting in touch. As far as I can tell, it is a photo of Thunderbolt. It has been reproduced in reliable sources as Thunderbolt (eg 1, 2, 3), and given that Westwood died in 1846, it is highly unlikely to be him since photography was still in its infancy. It would seem the filename and details over at Wiki Commons will have to be corrected. - HappyWaldo (talk) 12:32, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Jews in Spain
In my review about Spain's religion I added that Spain was granting Spanish citizenship to Sephardic Jews who could prove to have their ancestors in Spain. You erased this sentence because I didn’t add the link. Here it is. Unfortunedly I don’t know how to do it. Could you please do it for me? Muito obrigado. Ibn Gabirol
https://elpais.com/elpais/2016/01/22/inenglish/1453467510_159674.html Ibn Gabirol (talk) 15:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Diadumenian
Hi, I saw your edit on Diadumenian so this is my account. I started a convo on talk page so you kind discussing there? PrinceofFrancia (talk) 00:34, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Aitana and Vicente
The article says "[...] it is said they broke up on March", that is the definition of speculation. Anyway, why is Vicente relevant? We do not even know his last name. Why is Aitana's teenage relationship with a guy named Vicente encyclopedically relevant? How is the fact that she unfollowed some guy on Instagram encyclopedically relevant? Sar2de (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- I reworked the wording based on what your response and moved the piece of information to a new "Personal life" section. Sorry if I caused you disturbance, we can open the discussion on the talk page if you have further concern over this issue. Sar2de (talk) 17:41, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Women in Red June Editathons
Welcome to Women in Red's June 2018 worldwide online editathons.
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2018
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Sergio Ramos. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Jean Charles Davillier
Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Tajotep, thanks for creating Jean Charles Davillier!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This looks potentially interesting. Please expand this article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Nick Moyes (talk) 21:42, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Inappropriate Revert
Hi, Re:[5]. This revision was properly inappropriate. Because Sonu Ke Titu Ki Sweety flim is not a science fiction film or Robot film. Thank you, Siddiqsazzad001 <Talk/> 07:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Noel G. listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Noel G.. Since you had some involvement with the Noel G. redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Onel5969 TT me 23:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Hello from Portugal,
please, the display of the links was fine as it was. For example, when you wikilink Mundo Deportivo one time, no need to do it again.
Thank you. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
- Only noticed it now: and please, never again remove the translation of the foreign references i added like you did there, that is very serious. --Quite A Character (talk) 21:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Notbroken
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Matthew_Perryman_Jones&curid=6834723&diff=847517265&oldid=821709613 WP:NOTBROKEN. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, sorry, I just removed your recent addition as it was added to the 'Kits and crest' section so wasn't relevant. Perhaps this would be better suited to the History of the Argentina national football team article? Nzd (talk) 17:25, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in study
Hello,
I am E. Whittaker, an intern at Wikimedia with the Scoring Team to create a labeled dataset, and potentially a tool, to help editors deal with incivility when they encounter it on talk pages. A full write-up of the study can be found here: m:Research:Civil_Behavior_Interviews. We are currently recruiting editors to be interviewed about their experiences with incivility on talk pages. Would you be interested in being interviewed? I am contacting you because of your involvement in Wikipedia’s Women in Red project. The interviews should take ~1 hour, and will be conducted over BlueJeans (which does allow interviews to be recorded). If, so, please email me at ewhit@umich.edu in order to schedule an interview.
Thank you Ewitch51 (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
July 2018 at Women in Red
Hello again from Women in Red!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Hello, Tajotep. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Luis Cepeda, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:10, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Luis Cepeda moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Luis Cepeda, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arno Dorian.png
Thanks for uploading File:Arno Dorian.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. RL0919 (talk) 18:18, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Tajotep. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Leonora Summers, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Onel5969 TT me 12:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Ways to improve Frank Kesson
Hi, I'm Onel5969. Tajotep, thanks for creating Frank Kesson!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. It would be nice to have a filmography for this cinematographer.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Onel5969 TT me 12:55, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Flirty Four-Flushers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Flirty Four-Flushers, Tajotep!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice article about this silent film. If you're going to create articles about films/people from early cinema, you might want to check out: http://mediahistoryproject.org/collections/ -- it's a great resource, although it can be a bit time consuming.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 12:56, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (May Boley) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating May Boley, Tajotep!
Wikipedia editor Onel5969 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very nice job on this article. Keep it up.
To reply, leave a comment on Onel5969's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Onel5969 TT me 01:02, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frank Kesson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page How I Play Golf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Tom O'Brien (actor, born 1890)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Tom O'Brien (actor, born 1890), Tajotep!
Wikipedia editor In Memoriam A.H.H. just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice work on the article! However you should include a biography about O'Brien in order to get it off stub class. Good work!
To reply, leave a comment on In Memoriam A.H.H.'s talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
In Memoriam A.H.H.What, you egg?. 12:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Leonora Summers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leonora Summers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonora Summers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
Hippodrome of Berytus
Sorry, but we seem to have had an edit conflict, and my resolution of the same has inadvertently undone most (if not all) your work in the "History" section (that's the only section I've edited). Regards, Haploidavey (talk) 01:44, 14 July 2018 (UTC)done
OK, thanks for the note. The Wiki is unbreakable! Haploidavey (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of suicides in the 21st century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Williamsburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines
Hello, Tajotep. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Chilton Company, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
While you haven't edited the Chilton Company article itself, you've added dozens of wikilinks to it from other articles. This is fairly unusual, and caught my attention. If you have any connection with the Chilton Company, please disclose it. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 02:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
August 2018 at Women in Red
An exciting new month for Women in Red!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 11:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Şahkulu
Referring to your edit;
1) He was a Turkmen, not an Azerbaijani.
2) The Latin Azerbaijani script didn't exist at the time (anachronism).
3) It was added by a drive-by IP without any explanation/edit summary in 2016.[6]
- LouisAragon (talk) 15:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:15, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant, Tajotep!
Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thanks for your new article on Roscoe "Rustling Bob" Bryant.
To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:52, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 at Women in Red
September is an exciting new month for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons!
| ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!):
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:55, 26 August 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Pointless reverting
Exactly why did you do this? 146.90.125.77 (talk) 19:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of List of Order of Charles III recipients
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on List of Order of Charles III recipients, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 18:28, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Michael Copeman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable actor lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. Fails WP:ENT.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 03:55, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Michael Copeman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michael Copeman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Copeman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 13:16, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited El País, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Podemos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
Just clearing up a recent edit...
I recently noticed that you undid two edits I did to the Incredibles 2 page (one of which was to restore plot fixes I accidentally reverted from the first one). According to WP:FILMLEAD, the lead states that the primary genre and/or sub-genre can be used, and animation is really more of a format than an actual genre. As for the AllMovie link, it was the only one I could find that properly identified the genre. Just wanted to clear things up regarding my edits. IceWalrus236 (talk) 15:08, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Fixed link reverted
Hi Tajotep, I noticed you reverted a fixed link to an article "Why do cats purr?" on a page about Purr to a previous dead link. The link I provided is currently working for me. Was it intentional? Martinjanda (talk) 21:53, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Foreshortening redirect
Hi. The redirect you edited, Foreshortening, points to Perspective (graphical)#Foreshortening. There isn't enough info to make Foreshortening its own article, so please edit the target section instead of the redirect. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 16:33, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Virgilio Fossati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montefalcone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
List of suicides
Hi. Thanks for adding a citation for Jason Hairston. Just so you know, though, I removed the method of suicide, because it isn't mentioned in the cited source, and mistakenly attributed that info to you in my edit summary. Only now do I see it was added by User:73.223.15.78. Sorry about that. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
The source, The New Encyclopedia of Islam, by Cyril Glassé, page 129, "The conscription system used by the Ottomans. It consisted of taking male children from subject Christian populations, chiefly in the Balkans, forcibly converting them to Islam, and raising them to join the ranks of an elite military corps, the Jannissaries..." --Kansas Bear (talk) 14:55, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
It was changed to "willingfully" by User:Cybertroopers.[7] --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:02, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
October 2018 at Women in Red
Please join us... We have four new topics for Women in Red's worldwide online editathons in October!
| ||
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging |
Undo please
Before you undo something talk to me first why l removed them in the beginning. I removed the references because they are errors. It was l who wrote them in the beginning, and now it shows error on the references.
//Nemrud91
Modern Archaeology
Hi, modern archaeology redirects to Contemporary archaeology which "is a field of archaeological research that focuses on the most recent (20th and 21st century) past". In almost all cases this is not what is meant by "modern archaeology", which typically refers to modern archaeological techniques. I have reverted a few of your changes to incorrectly link to modern archaeology, but as you have made so many changes please could you revert the rest of your changes yourself. Thanks. BabelStone (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Reverting the "Snoke" edit
When I edited that item, I checked the reference....the Wiki article was missing the end parenthesis that was in the reference. I was putting it. Never will there be a beginning parenthesis, without an end one. Not in English, anyways. Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
EMENDATION: When I edited that item, I checked the reference....the Wiki article was missing the end parenthesis that was in the reference. I was putting it **back in**. Never will there be a beginning parenthesis, without an end one. Not in English, anyways. Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC) Hockeycowboy (talk) 03:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Assassin's Creed Odyssey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Darius (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Get ready for November with Women in Red!
Three new topics for WiR's online editathons in November, two of them supporting other initiatives
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:40, 14 October 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please read it, and follow it. Johnbod (talk) 02:28, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Red Dead Redemption 2: difference about favorite (U.S.) / favourite (U.K.) spelling
Hello Tajotep,
My edit on Red Dead Redemption 2 had been done because the article is specifically written in American English which it has own words, as indicated on its talk page.
On Wikipedia, every article has own spelling conventions. For example, for British related topics, they are written in British English, and for Indian related topics, written in Indian English. Please read this article, in case if you didn't know that.
Regards, --176.137.222.240 (talk) 15:06, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
WikiProject Latin music invitation
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal. |
I've noticed your contributions to articles related musicians from Spain and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 13:01, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
More than a plot
Hi Tajotep, I seem to be moving uphill with this, but the content I removed was far more than a plot description [8]. It includes the writer's intent and reason for cancellation. Thank you, 2601:188:180:1481:E08B:61B7:5650:EA7E (talk) 17:35, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
Lopetegui
Hey, he is not sacked yet. He was active at the training session today. Kante4 (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
- This is why we wait for official sources. And that edit was way too detalied. Kante4 (talk) 16:41, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
To Tajotep
I am politely asking you to stop undoing my constructive edits without rhyme or reason. It seems to me like deliberate antagonism on your part (why would you otherwise also undo my DuckTales edit out of the blue) and if you keep this up I'll report you for edit warring. Thanks. 186.31.11.33 (talk) 23:52, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright problem on The Serpent (Da Vinci's Demons)
Hello Tajotep. Unfortunately I had to remove the plot section from the above article, as it's a match for the content at http://natgeotv.com/in/da-vinci-s-demons/about. I have also removed this and several other plot summaries from List of Da Vinci's Demons episodes as they're copyright and thus not available for us to copy. Sorry, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:21, 3 November 2018 (UTC)
Unsourced birth dates
Please don't add unsourced birth dates, as you did in this edit. Since you didn't cite your source, I don't know where you're getting your information from. But if it's the IMDb, please be aware that this is not a reliable source. Nor is filmreference.com, another commonly cited website for actors. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:59, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
To Tajotep, again
If you want to discuss this and explain your unconstructive, vandalizing behaviour, I refer you to Clementine's talk page to hash this out. Thanks. 186.31.190.188 (talk) 17:43, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Victims of the White Terror
This article presupposes that any of us have a clue what the White Terror was. We don't have a clue. Please write an introductory paragraph which provides a context for the remainder of the article. In general, all articles should be written based on the presumption that the reader does not know the subject area; the article should explain the subject to the user. thx. --Tagishsimon (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks Tajotep. That's very much better; and I appreciate that sometimes you have to leave an article half-done because of a shortage of time. Thank you for your work.
- I have a copy of 'The Spanish Civil War' by Hugh Thomas, which seems to be the (English language) definitive text, on my bookshelf, but I confess I have yet to make much headway through it. Must do so; such a fascinating and sad epoch of history with - again sadly - so much contemporary resonance. --Tagishsimon (talk) 22:47, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Tajotep. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
December 2018 at Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
December 2018 at Women in Red
The WiR December editathons provide something for everyone.
Continuing: | ||
Latest headlines, news, and views on the Women in Red talkpage (Join the conversation!): (To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) |
Hello, Tajotep,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you:-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jacqueline Cantrelle, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click
Publish Changes
button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept, either in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. At any case, please consider improving the page to address the issues raised or it may be deleted later anyway.
If you have any questions, leave a comment here and ping me.
Onel5969 TT me 14:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Mass reversions of Gaiseric to "Genseric"
Hi,
At my suggestion, the Gaiseric article is now at Gaiseric (instead of Genseric). Since it is my responsibility to make sure wikilinks point to the correct article, and since Gaiseric is the most common name in recent scholarly sources, I have tried to fix some of the articles which refer to "Genseric" and wl there. Why are you mass reverting these fixes? If you disagree with the name change, please explain on talk:Gaiseric. 173.66.2.216 (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
P.S. I see you have also changed all references to Gaiseric, on Gaiseric, back to Genseric. 173.66.2.216 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
Lee Marvin
yes Welcome to Nightvale is quite funny, but it can stand alone without linking to an actor's biography.
A pie for you!
Great article creation in 'victims of the White Terror (Spain)'! Keep it up! Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 00:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for December 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Watto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Review (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
PYRAMID OF CELSIUS, ROME.
You reverted my edit of this article in which I stated accurately that the Protestant Cemetary in Rome is also called the Non-Catholic Cemetary (which is its correct name now). The name was changed after US Ambassador Reinhardt, who was then in charge of the Cemetary, permitted Antiono Gramsci to be buried there. Why did you revert my entry?? dabney88 / dpark@performanceinc.netDabney88 (talk) 14:51, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
Category:Mill Creek Entertainment has been nominated for discussion
Category:Mill Creek Entertainment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
January 2019 at Women in Red
January 2019, Volume 5, Issue 1, Numbers 104-108
January events:
|
You truly are a piece of work
It amazes me how a user with so many badges for supposed cooperative behavior has consistently acted in such a rude, childish, and uncooperative way. You simply keep reverting my edits to the Clementine page without any reasoning at all. You're not even SEEING what you are undoing and how you're making the opening paragraphs so badly worded. This is pure provocation and petty antagonism on your part. I fully expect you to not address me at all or think about the work you're undoing because you are a disgusting coward. Have a nice day. 186.154.25.195 (talk) 04:51, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Would you please tell me the rationale for this change?
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=New_Christian&diff=next&oldid=875061710
deisenbe (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Fine. Here's your explanation for why the Clementine page needs those changes
Second paragraph describing first Walking Dead season: "In the first season, Clementine is a young 8-9 year old girl".
The first addition is a preposition to the sentence which you seem intent on removing. Why I have no idea, this is just basic wording. The second is a more accurate description of Clementine's age as she does not stay 8 years old throughout the entirety of the first season, which the fifth and final episode even acknowledges.
Third paragraph describing second Walking Dead season: "This season has several endings".
Again, because you don't even care to watch what you revert, you keep changing this word back to "series", which is wrong because the sentence is just referring to the single second season and not the entire Telltale's Walking Dead series.
Happy? 186.154.25.195 (talk) 15:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (I'll Kill Him and Return Alone) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating I'll Kill Him and Return Alone.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
The sources need to be in English.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
TomCat4680 (talk) 00:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (List of Spaghetti Western filmmakers) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating List of Spaghetti Western filmmakers.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice idea! Don't forget to add tags on Talk Page.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Britishfinance (talk) 16:52, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Cultural depictions of Jesse James) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Cultural depictions of Jesse James.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Love this article! Make sure that it does not stray into POV territory and keep focused on recording the the examples of James appearing in wider media. Well done.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Britishfinance (talk) 13:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jesse James into Cultural depictions of Jesse James. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:11, 19 January 2019 (UTC)
In regard to this edit, we can't use Weekly World News as a source because much of the publication was fictional and/or satirical. The cited article didn't even mention the name of O'Toole's school, so even if we were 100% sure that the WWN was being honest in that particular article, it still wouldn't have been a great source for the sentence in the Wikipedia article for which it was being used. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:11, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Gente que viene y bah
Hello, Tajotep,
Thanks for creating Gente que viene y bah! I edit here too, under the username Slatersteven and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Not a lot here really. You are gona need a bit more then this.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Slatersteven (talk) 12:20, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
February 2019 at Women in Red
February 2019, Volume 5, Issue 2, Numbers 107-111
February events:
|
Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Santo Domingo de Silos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Instituto Nacional de Estadística (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019 at Women in Red
March 2019, Volume 5, Issue 3, Numbers 107, 108, 112, 113
Please join us for these virtual events:
| ||
|
Ana Guerra
You can check it here: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ana_Guerra — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.223.110.12 (talk) 20:12, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Xan das Bolas
Hello, Tajotep,
Thanks for creating Xan das Bolas! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Hi, Great start to the article but you will need more references (from reliable independent sources) to establish the notability of the subject. Regards
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 23:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)
Category:Films produced by B. F. Zeidman has been nominated for discussion
Category:Films produced by B. F. Zeidman, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
April editathons at Women in Red
April 2019
April 2019, Volume 5, Issue 4, Numbers 107, 108, 114, 115, 116, 117
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
(Please excuse this post if it is a duplicate!)
A page you started (Gimme (film)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gimme (film).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MainlyTwelve}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
MainlyTwelve (talk) 00:27, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
May you join this month's editathons from WiR!
May 2019, Volume 5, Issue 5, Numbers 107, 108, 118, 119, 120, 121
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:17, 27 April 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Islam in Spain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dialnet (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
June events with WIR
June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:43, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ABC 7 News listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ABC 7 News. Since you had some involvement with the ABC 7 News redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:23, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Michael Enright
I would like to know why you undid my edits and put back false allegations on Michael Enright? Jordan Matson made a bunch of unverified and untrue claims about Enright on a Facebook page he ran, and the media wrongly picked it up. No media tried to verify any of the claims before they reported on it, so because the media was sloppy, Wikipedia needs to continue smearing Enright? Matson falsely accused Enright of trying to kill himself, but Matson actually tried to kill himself. On whose Wikipedia page is an attempted suicide posted? Enright’s. Matson was kicked out of the United States military before he ever was deployed, and on Enright's page Matson is introduced as a US Solider, giving Matson more credibility. The Daily Mail had the worst articles. They had three false articles about Enright in 2015 and one false article in 2016, all based on Matson’s Facebook post. We found out about a Watchdog group in England that has a lot of power, the Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO), and with their help we were able to convince the Daily Mail to change their online articles. They also gave a retraction. Here is IPSO’s resolution statement:
I had previously removed Matson's false allegations against Enright from Wikipedia. I don’t understand why you insist that Wikipedia include the false and humiliating accusations against Enright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Komicie (talk • contribs) 08:54, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bastian Vasquez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:56, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
August 2019 at Women in Red
August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, Tajotep,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jose Halufi, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click
Publish Changes
button.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 23:35, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red
September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roy Applegate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All for a Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Thanks for creating Rufino Inglés.
User:Willbb234 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
Please provide a WP:RS for the filmography section. The list, I feel, comes from the IMDb which is not as WP:RS. Thanks
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 15:56, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RLJE Films films
A tag has been placed on Category:RLJE Films films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:41, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Luis Cepeda concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Luis Cepeda, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:34, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Luis Cepeda
Hello, Tajotep. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Luis Cepeda".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:10, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
ACCEPTED
A user has edited and accepted the draft that has now been moved to mainspace at Luis Cepeda. Please consider updating the article with recent information. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Edit summaries
Pleae do use ES:edit summaries so your fellow editors call follow the rationale of your changes. Thanks Anna (talk) 22:43, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for November 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Messiah (1975 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Philip and John (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:33, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
Draft:José María Gay de Liébana concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:José María Gay de Liébana, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR
December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Raúl Cimas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page El Comercio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Sergio Martino: Difference between revisions
The supposedly "unsourced" release dates for the Sergio Martino films you deleted were "sourced" from the existing Wikipedia pages created for those individual films. Should the dates from those pages be deleted as well?. Such is the total lack of consistent editorial logic at Wikipedia. Also the same dates are easily available on hundreds of other sites, including the IMDb (how much proof-of-year sourcing does one need?). Deleting the release dates makes no sense. But, institutionalized absurdities have always been central to Wikipedia's rigid and ridiculous editorial guidelines which is why I quit making regular contributions years ago. -- Ghost2011 (talk) 15:33, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:José María Gay de Liébana
Hello, Tajotep. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "José María Gay de Liébana".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 22 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red
January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
Speedy deletion nomination of History of bookselling
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on History of bookselling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.geni.com/projects/Booksellers/26826. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SouravDas1998t@lk to me? 15:41, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Tajotep
Thank you for creating Cindy Grover.
User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for your new article on Cindy Grover. Please try to add biographical details like date of birth, etc. if those details are available in reliable sources.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:37, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petén Department, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page INE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Enrique Múgica
On 13 April 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Enrique Múgica, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Deletion discussion about Al-Furqan Media Foundation
Hello, Tajotep, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Al-Furqan Media Foundation, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Furqan Media Foundation.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 12:21, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Category:WCVB-TV has been nominated for deletion
Category:WCVB-TV has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 14:04, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Film poster for Conquistadores Adventvm, 2017.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Film poster for Conquistadores Adventvm, 2017.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Al-Furqan Media Foundation.png
Thanks for uploading File:Al-Furqan Media Foundation.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Revere's Midnight Ride
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Paul Revere's Midnight Ride requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mohammadsyedhusain.wordpress.com/2016/09/19/paul-revere/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:27, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
Disculpa
Mea culpa. He hecho un error. CommanderWaterford (talk) 18:00, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Tajotep
Thank you for creating Juana la Loca... de vez en cuando.
User:Barkeep49, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Movies benefit from having a reception section.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Barkeep49 (talk) 19:35, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Translating
Hi, when translating from other language Wikipedias, such as at África Pratt, you need to give attribution:
- You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary Content in this edit is translated from the existing Spanish Wikipedia article at es:África Pratt; see its history for attribution.
- You should also add the template {{Translated|es|África Pratt}} to the talk page.
- For more guidance, see Wikipedia:Translation.
Regards --John B123 (talk) 18:38, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Francesco de' Rossi
Hi Tajotep, I noticed that you were the one way back in 2017 that made this edit on Francesco de' Rossi. Can you confirm the source you used to update the death date from 1563 to November 11, 1562? I've looked through all of the references with the exception of the Pelican History of Art, and am having no luck to pin down the source. Cheers, Engineerchange (talk) 06:27, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look and updating! --Engineerchange (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
December with Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Herb Muller has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Very brief, very minor actor, who does not pass WP:NACTOR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 13:32, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:RLJE Films films
A tag has been placed on Category:RLJE Films films requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons with Women in Red
Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Lorenzo de' Medici, Duke of Urbino
You might have provided a reason for undoing my edit. I'll give you the opportunity to do so before I do anything else. The reason I gave for removing "Lord of Florence" was "corrected title." What was behind that is that I saw no evidence that Lorenzo was called "Lord of Florence." "Lord of Florence" links to "List of Rulers of Tuscany," which does not identify him as "Lord of Florence"; it identifies Cosimo de' Medici as "First de facto Lord of Florence."
I replaced "Lord of Florence" with the identity of the painter and the year of the painting, because I think that that is of interest. Even if you have evidence that Lorenzo was known as "Lord of Florence," I think that "Raphael, 1518" should be there too.Maurice Magnus (talk) 00:42, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
I'm fine with the changes you made, except where is the painting page on Commons? Following your lead, I changed "Lord" to "Ruler" for Lorenzo de' Medici too -- Lorenzo the Magnificent.Maurice Magnus (talk) 16:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Forgive my ignorance, but is there anything in Lorenzo's entry that will take readers to the painting on Commons or the url of The Met? If not, shouldn't there be? Where did you add the url of the Met?Maurice Magnus (talk) 20:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
I added a footnote under the portrait. Are you okay with it? Maurice Magnus (talk) 21:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
December 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"1883 Magazine" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 1883 Magazine. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 27#1883 Magazine until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Kent Family Chronicles
I'm not opening a merger discussion for a page that barely breaks 25 views a day. Not worth it. May as well go and revert the other two while you're at it. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 00:53, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
June events from Women in Red
Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Based on your work on Cultural depictions of George Washington, I thought you might also be interested in a draft I have started at Draft:Cultural depictions of Thomas Jefferson. Cheers. BD2412 T 07:22, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red August 2022
Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging