User talk:SWP13
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:SWP13. |
| This is SWP13's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
WelcomeWelcome!
[edit]
|
Talk 2013
[edit]September 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page DIII-D (fusion reactor) has been reverted.
Your edit here to DIII-D (fusion reactor) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://generalatomics.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/diiiman-e1366822463911.jpg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:14, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
Talk 2016
[edit]Article Talks
[edit]This is where I keep the article talks so that I remember to visit them for responses. Talk:Catherine Belkhodja, Talk:Hosea Stout,
If you wish to add a Talk Topic, please insert title begin and end with === and sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~);
Hosea Stout copyright problem
[edit]Some of the material you included in the above article was copied from here, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please let me know if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
A meeting was held on a certain date and I have made reference to the source. Why is this a copyright issue? SWP13 (talk)
- Sorry for the delay in replying. I was unaware you had a question. Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view what the bot found.— Diannaa (talk) 15:21, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
SWP13 in French Wikipedia
[edit]Someone left a French discussion however, my French is probably equivalent to a 3 year old at the moment. Sometime in the future, I should take a look at it. [[1]] SWP13 (talk) 03:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Talk 2017
[edit]Your help desk question
[edit]You have responses.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 22:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
famousbirthdays.com is not a reliable source
[edit]Hi SWP13 . I'm in the process of removing famousbirthdays.com as a source from Wikipedia, because it's not reliable (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). I noticed that you've added it, and wanted to make sure you understood why it's being removed. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 23:18, 11 January 2017 (UTC) [2][3]
- It's fine. Is there a list of unreliable source for birthdays besides imdb.com and famousbirthdays.com? SWP13 (talk) 02:32, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
- I wish there were such a list. WP:ELPEREN gives some information about commonly used links, and includes imdb. A search of WP:RSN will at least allow you to check for common consensus about individual links. --Ronz (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
Reporting Vandalism
[edit]Hi, I noticed from a message that you left on someone's user page that you were unaware of how to report persistent vandals to administrators. WP:AIV is the place for vandalism reporting. Might I suggest using WP:TWINKLE? To enable it, you need to go to Preferences -> Gadgets -> tick Twinkle: automate common tasks such as reporting vandalism.. Let me know if you have any questions! (or need any help). Best, Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 20:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
Thank you. SWP13 (talk) 06:50, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
You do not own articles, so stop telling other editors not to edit them
[edit]
Hello. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors on John Bohn. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. 32.218.40.184 (talk) 00:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Please do not assume ownership of articles as you did at Francis F. Chen. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. 32.218.40.184 (talk) 00:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
FindAGrave is not a reliable source
[edit]Read WP:PEREN 32.218.40.184 (talk) 00:05, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Infobox request for Hiya (caller profile company)
[edit]Hi, I see you have created a number of infoboxes. I wonder if you might be willing to create a basic one for the company I work for, Hiya. I think Template:Infobox company is the best template; if you'd like suggestions on what items to put in I'd be happy to make some. One thing I'd especially like to see is our logo. There is a version here, or I could send you a higher resolution version. Would you mind making the infobox? Also, if you have any feedback on the article, that would be great. I'm going to put in some incoming links to hopefully get the "orphan" tag removed, and add a category or two. -Lizhpowell (talk) 20:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Sure, I can create an infobox. If you post an image of the company or logo to wiki common, let me know. Be aware of image copyright legals. SWP13 (talk) 02:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Daniel Silva
[edit]Whoa! Thanks for all that amazing cleanup. I've been trying to keep some of those in alignment but don't really know my way around infoboxes so thanks for the cleanup. Any thoughts on standardization of article names w/r/t to Silva novel or not? StarM 04:19, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
Response: Simple. I displayed all the novels in order and fix them as needed. Plots are a bit challenging. The novels still require some cleanup. SWP13 (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)
- Well done. There's a note from an editor on my talk re: the covers but I'm not familiar enough to take that on. StarM 01:57, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, SWP13. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Talk 2018
[edit]March 2018
[edit]Hello. Please don’t add “This is a Chinese name. The family name is <surname>.” to pages titled “<English name> <surname>.” Since readers can tell the surname is a surname, the text doesn’t provide any additional info.
Let’s take a look at Iris Chang. The surname is Chinese, and the first name is American. Her name is Chinese-American, not Chinese. Give Chinese-Americans proper treatment, write abou who they are, not what their names are or how to pronounce them. Don’t treat us with exoticism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.122.177.25 (talk) 17:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Invitation to WikiProject Portals
[edit]The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.
You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.
There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.
Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.
It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.
The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.
A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.
We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.
Let's do this.
See ya at the WikiProject!
Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 10:24, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
Look af my home page.
[edit]We’re surprisingly similar. I’m currently trying to figure out if I want to tackle an Infobox for Lynch victims (I started List of lynching victims in the United States). I’m not that great a coder. deisenbe (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Will take a look when I get back to wiki edit soon. Let me if you have good sources on lynching victims. SWP13 (talk) 22:10, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Thank you very much (Portals rescue)
[edit]The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.
By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.
I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.
Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.
If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.
Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 10:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT
Lila Gene George
[edit]Thanks for your cleanup of the article. SL93 (talk) 19:49, 15 November 2018 (UTC) >>You're welcome.SWP13 (talk) 19:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SWP13. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Anna Sutherland Bissell
[edit]Hooray -- I'll keep mashing that thanks button. I found out about her because I came upon a photo of her husband when I was doing #1Lib1Ref work and was like "Hey she's pretty amazing" Thanks for all the work you did. Jessamyn (talk) 15:40, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
Emily Middlemas
[edit]Hello, Thank you for adding to Emily Middlemas recently, and for trying to help save it! Let’s hope we win the battle haha. Joesimnett (talk) 17:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Take part in a survey
[edit]Hi SWP13
We're working to measure the value of Wikipedia in economic terms. We want to ask you some questions about how you value being able to edit Wikipedia.
Our survey should take about 10-15 minutes of your time. We hope that you will enjoy it and find the questions interesting. All answers will be kept strictly confidential and will be anonymized before the aggregate results are published. Regretfully, we can only accept responses from people who live in the US due to restrictions in our grant-based funding.
As a reward for your participation, we will randomly pick 1 out of every 5 participants and give them $25 worth of goods of their choice from the Wikipedia store (e.g. Wikipedia themed t-shirts). Note that we can only reward you if you are based in the US.
Click here to access the survey: https://mit.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_eXJcEhLKioNHuJv
Thanks
Avi
Researcher, MIT Initiative on the Digital Economy --Avi gan (talk) 06:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
>>Responded on your talk. SWP13 (talk) 06:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC) .
Empty section
[edit]Hi SWP13! There is no need to add an "External links" section to articles that don't have one but have the "Authority control" template, such as Lucia Travaini. The AC template simply goes to the bottom of the article, above the categories. Similarly, while inline citations are preferable, referenced added directly to a "References" section are still references, so I've removed the extra heading added to Lollius Bassus. The latter article is just a rewording of his entry in the DGRBM, so it doesn't need "additional citations for verification", and so I've removed the template you added. One last thing: as per MOS:BODY, "Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading", so in a short biography such as Lucia Travaini or Luo Li Rong, its better to just have one "Biography"/"Life" section instead of breaking it up. I hope these comments are helpful, Gaia Octavia Agrippa Talk 21:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
John Clarence Webster
[edit]I wrote this article several years ago and somehow it was overlooked until now. So, thank you for assessing it. However, I must protest your assessment. Surely it is much more comprehensive than a stub. Might I suggest a B at worst? Verne Equinox (talk) 02:04, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
>>>Responded to Verne Equinox talk page. SWP13 (talk) 03:57, 29 December 2018 (UTC)
Talk 2019
[edit]Kate Bock DOB?
[edit]What's your source for Kate Bock's date of birth? I didn't see one in the section you added to the article. —C.Fred (talk) 14:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)
>>Ref added. Kate Bock at si.com. SWP13 (talk) 04:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Betty Tom Chu) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Betty Tom Chu.
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This page could use an image. It would also be worthwhile to track down her DOB. Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Citrivescence (talk) 05:26, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
>>@Citrivescence: Thanks for the review. Is there a tag that you reviewed Betty Tom Chu's in her talk page? Also, did you change infobox occupation to lawyer? She was a former mayor and banker also.SWP13 (talk) 05:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- @SWP13: I'm not sure what you mean by the first question--I don't know and haven't been instructed to add a tag to the talk pages for articles I've reviewed. As for the second, I did change her occupation since she is no longer in politics. However, if you want to add it back, I think that would be fine. Citrivescence (talk) 05:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Start class?
[edit]I looked at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women/Assessment to see if the project has extra rigid rules for start class, but didn't see them. Asking because of Caroline Stam. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:46, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
>>@Gerda Arendt: Birth place and date content missing. Could be class=start. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 16:41, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- For me, anything with a ref is start, stub is for unreferenced one-liners. Many biographies don't have DOB and POB, especially of female singers I bet, intentionally so ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Zhenghua issue
[edit]Hi my friend.
I saw your positive contribution on Zhang Zhenghua article. But I realized that they voted to remove that article. I just want to know your opinion that what criteria did I miss in that issue? Were there any possibilities to keep that article? MrInfo2012 Talk 14:33, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
>>@MrInfo2012: Thought I could help save that guy. Your sources are week. Need good sources. Lots of bad editors who prefers destruction, especially to Asian names and Middle Eastern names. Don't take it personal. Here is the link to deleted log. [Zhang Zhenghua's deleted log] I just saved some guy a few days ago, wasn't easy. Let me know if you need support in the future. Drink something sweet to make yourself feel better. SWP13 (talk) 23:55, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello, SWP13,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Onel5969 and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Seran Kim, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to prevent the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}} - Click
Publish Changesbutton.
But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Onel5969 TT me 13:36, 22 January 2019 (UTC)
>>I have added comments on Seran Kim's talk page.SWP13 (talk) 04:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
- >>I have added justification on Sedan Kim's talk yet you still deleted it. SWP13 (talk) 19:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Links to DAB pages on your User page
[edit]Hi! I noticed you have three links to DAB pages on your User page. You probably meant to link:
Chow --> Chow (surname)
Lok --> many potentials names with surnames
Dewey --> Dewey (surname)
dawnleelynn(talk) 23:37, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
:>>@Dawnleelynn: Thanks for visiting my User page. A while ago, I attempted to update some Asian/Chinese surnames. I didn't like the fact that incorrect spellings were linked. So, Chan, Chen, Chun , or Chin may have same Chinese characters but they should be distinguished separately. Like Smith is not Smithes. The wiki files may have changed over time. I don't bother with those unless someone needs help. :) SWP13 (talk) 01:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Not sure we are communicating on this. First of all, I am not going to change your User page; that is policy. When someone clicks Chow on your User page it takes them to a disambiguation page. See Wikipedia:Disambiguation. A DAB is a page that is usually only linked to when you have an article that is the same name as several articles and then only from inside an article or from a redirect. The user gets a list of choices and picks the one they need. This DAB page for Chow has entries for such things like Chow Chow a dog breed, Mr. Chow a restaurant chain, Chow (unit), an obsolete unit of mass in the pearl trade in Mumbai, and finally way down the list is the one you want, Chow (surname). Rather than having your end user have to search the list for Chow (surname), you can rather link to it directly by using Chow (surname), skipping the disambiguation page altogether. Besides, the end user doesn't even know which entry they are looking for necessarily.
- So, I'm simply suggesting a replacement of the dab page wikilinks with a direct link to the item instead. There are even bots around that do this, inform you that you have links to dab pages. Also of note is that you can set an option in your preferences that changes the color of dab links to orange, which is why I even noticed your dab links in the first place. They stood out due to the changed color.
- So, I'm simply suggesting a replacement of the dab page wikilinks with a direct link to the item instead. There are even bots around that do this, inform you that you have links to dab pages. Also of note is that you can set an option in your preferences that changes the color of dab links to orange, which is why I even noticed your dab links in the first place. They stood out due to the changed color.
- I already gave you the replacement to link to the pages directly for two of them. I didn't do it for Dewey because there was more than one possibility on the dab page. I assure you, this is standard practice when writing in Wikipedia, not just my idea. dawnleelynn(talk) 02:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>Thanks. Looking at the history, it was the disamb Chow page that I updated. SWP13 (talk) 02:21, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oh my goodness, you (and a couple others) did all of that work in the Chow article and then an editor just coldly deleted it from that DAB article. If it was me, I would have talked to you first. It could have possibly been added to the Chow (surname) article, but you would know more about that than me. Which reminds me, I didn't tell you how great was all the work you put into your User page, by the way. Some really helpful information to the right people. Very nice. I guess you probably had the same issue with the other two DAB pages. A real shame, for sure. I'm sure you'll figure out the best resolution for them at some point. Happy Trails! dawnleelynn(talk) 04:17, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Dawnleelynn: As always, thanks for visiting. I'm doing assessments of WikiProject Women and others now. Started when it had about 7000+, now, it's down around 5000+. Did you know that Warren Buffett's mother (Leila Stahl Buffett) was deleted because some editor said she was not notable; she died a millionaire and gave her $ to her daughter, whom donated to a library. I am also sad that Seran Kim got deleted. I am determined to move up the wiki editor rankings now. Won't be able to go near top 10, but top 1000 will do. Ha!Ha! Cheers! SWP13 (talk) 07:20, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) Just a quick note, if you would like Leila Stahl Buffett or Seran Kim restored to your userspace for further work, just say so and I will. I managed to rescue Sara Roosevelt before it hit the bin. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Ritchie333:, thanks for offering a restore of wiki pages, but I did the best I could on them (Leila Stahl Buffett and Seran Kim). I can't improve them any more. Maybe someone can. Needs someone to visit Buffett's hometown and the lib in her name. I have lots of pages that I want to create, but I probably wait a bit. I am frustrated with the editors who tag and delete. SWP13 (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi there!
[edit]
I just wanted to drop by and say Hi! I like your positive energy and if you ever need any research help, or references from behind a paywall, let me know. :) Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Megalibrarygirl:,
Thanks for visiting. Don't understand the concept of paywall. Please explain. Thanks,SWP13 (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- You didn't ping her, so she doesn't know you responded to her. A paywall is a resource where you need to subscribe to get access. An example would be newspapers.com. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Dawnleelynn:, Thanks for your reminder.SWP13 (talk) 19:58, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Precious
[edit]gnomish work
Thank you for quality articles such as God of War (film) and Margaret Stoughton Abell, for updating articles such as Rosemary Vandenbroucke, for gnomish work such as adding project tags, infoboxes, authority control, reflist, for article assessments, for spreading positive energy and appreciation (Good Job), - you are an awesome Wikipedian!
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>Hi @Gerda Arendt:, Thank you for stopping by my user page. Thank you for the beautiful sapphire image and your encouragements. God of War (film) was the first article that I created after watching the film and I am very proud of it. I do assessments now because it is very relaxing. Along the way, I find many amazing people out there. Keep up your good work also.SWP13 (talk) 22:45, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
>>@Gerda Arendt:, Wow, Back in Feb 2019, I thought it was a pretty gem image from you. This is really a Wikipedia Award. I found the user box for this award.
 | This user has been identified as an awesome Wikipedian. |
List of Precious 2019 award receipients
Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 17:30, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- A year ago, you were recipient no. 2137 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:27, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
>>Hi @Gerda Arendt:, Looks like you've been busy as well. Since receiving the Precious award, I've been doing more editing. I had ~17,000 edits (in Feb 2019) and now I have ~38,000 edits. I have been created pages for a while. I really thank you for your award! SWP13 (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for caring about Jessye Norman's article, borrowing her smile --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Congratulations!
[edit]I saw you also received the Precious award. That's so exciting, congratulations! So much of the attention on Wikipedia seems to be focused on article creation. So I am happy when I see someone receive attention for Wikignoming. I myself do both. Anyway, that's just very fitting as I have seen you've been making a difference for around two years. Gerda is right on!
Content Assessment
[edit]I have previously tried to persuade you to follow policy when assessing WikiProjects in talk pages here and here. The policies are based on Wikipedia:Content assessment. I have been following policy myself. Adherence to policy is mostly accomplished through other editors. You can refer to Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines under "Enforcement. Persuasion is the first step. I have been "persuaded" too, many times. If it were just a few articles I would leave it, but you, yourself, told me you already edited around 2,000 articles with 5,000 more to go. That's a lot of stubs, e.g. An article such as Anna Maestri, should not be classified as a stub. Marjorie Liu is definitely a C-class article, as just a couple examples. Regarding unassessed projects, I urge you to classify them according to the grading table and not arbitrarily lump them into the Start class. Sometimes it is very evident that they belong in a higher class. Perhaps this can help: Wikipedia:Assessing articles.
Regarding policy for stubs, they are so different they have their own policy page, Wikipedia:Stub, "A stub is an article that, although providing some useful information, is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, and that is capable of expansion." "Sizable articles are usually not considered stubs, even if they have significant problems or are noticeably incomplete. With these larger articles, a cleanup template is usually added instead of a stub template." Let me know if you need help finding a cleanup template.
Furthermore regarding stub articles: Editors interact with stubs in a number of ways that are different than other articles. So, it is important that a lengthy article is not a stub. And it's not subjective, there's a pretty clear range of the number of words that defines a stub. It runs from 500 to 1,500 words per the Stub policy. Additionally, I find I need to add the stub template to articles on occasion. You might find this useful: Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types. And, always match the article stub template to the talk page classes so that both are stub.
- >>To answer your several questions.
1. I do not arbitrarily lump the articles as you describe. I do follow the assessment guidelines. If you don't agree with my assessment, please feel free to upgrade the assessment class as needed.
2. Wikipedia:Content assessment does not specify word count for stub, start, C class, or any class. It also does not specify the number of references. The description for each category is a guideline.
3. Anna Maestri existed as stub for WikiProject Biography. The 2 ref included are in Italian and they do not have links for verification. I set WikiProject Women to stub class to match the existing class.
4. Marjorie Liu started with class as blank. It can possibly become a C class. I have not checked the refs, so I will leave it as it for now. If you have reviewed the ref links and wish to upgrade it, please do so.
5. Wikipedia:Assessing articles#Article life cycle is also a good guideline. Article status should progressively improve.
6. I noticed you have been changing many start class to stubs without specific justification.
SWP13 (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
1. On Megalibrarygirl's talk page, you said, "Glad you are monitoring some pages. I mostly assess WikiProject with class that is blank. I assess the page as stub or start. Feel free to upgrade to higher level (C, B, GA,..) if you wish" I was only urging you to stop addressing articles as stub unless an article was a stub and go beyond the start class when an article was obviously a higher class aka not lump them into Start class per your own words. Also, your editing history shows assessments of start and stub, never anything higher.
2. You are taking it out of context. I said the Stub policy talked about word limits and it does. The stub policy is not a guideline. It says policy on that page. If you read the Stub policy, you will see the word limits I spoke of. p.s. The individual content assessment tables in each project do not say guidelines. For example, Wikipedia:WikiProject Women/Assessment.
3. I gave one example out of hundreds that you have edited. I could cite more. I have seen you go against the existing class as well, including in my own article, Mary Walker (rodeo), where you not only went against the existing classes, but downgraded the WikiProject Women class. A different article you classified as stub Micah Fowler was changed by another editor the next day to Start class. Let me also mention Florencia Marotta-Wurgler which was classified as a stub, wherein you also added a comment advising not to change it from the stub class, therein also promoting your made-up criteria for setting classes as stubs.
4. References are not necessarily a reason to hold back an article from class C; references and broken links are your criteria, not the project's. Anyway, it was just an example. The article Caroline Stam that Gerda asked you about was recently changed by an admin to C-class. And there was that article John Clarence Webster by Verne Equinox.
6. The articles I changed to stub class were stub articles. I changed the talk pages classes to match the stub article. This is correct, and you should be doing it as well. Instead, you are adding the stub class to articles that should not have it, and not adding the stub class to articles that should have it. I mentioned that they should match up. I have also added the stub template to articles too. Stub tags should match up between articles and talk pages. I think it was pretty clear. I hope this helps clear things up. I really think that the Stub policy is pretty easy to understand.
Cleanup templates
[edit]There are dozens and dozens of cleanup templates available on Wikipedia at: Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup. I didn't even realize there were this many. Hope this helps. dawnleelynn(talk) 05:02, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Dawnleelynn:Wikipedia is endless. You can help by fixing the list of articles which have been downgrade to stub. I do limit my time here. Let me know when the foundation start paying us.. :) SWP13 (talk) 05:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, Wikipedia is endless, agreed. Not quite sure what you mean about the stubs, but I will help you with whatever I can. That's a good one about the foundation. :) dawnleelynn(talk) 07:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>If you want, make a list of the articles which you down graded from start to stub. So when I have time, I can bring them back to start or better.SWP13 (talk) 07:29, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Okay, you can call it downgrading if you must, LOL. I was changing the classifications in the talk page to match the article, which has a stub template. Whoever set the WikiProject classes, set them incorrectly. A lot of these were set before you edited the article. If you see articles with stub templates, it's necessary and safe to change the talk page WikiProjects to stub class too. The only way that editors can find stubs is through the talk page class. And there are lots of editors where that's their thing; they like to expand stubs, even rewrite some of content in the process too. So you are in good company in wanting to expand stubs. We have several stub articles in the Rodeo project where I work. I have expanded some occasionally, but I must admit it's not my favorite thing. I admire anyone who does it regularly. After the article is larger than a stub, you can remove the stub template from the article, and classify it Start or higher in the talk page. And, of course, I will make a list for you of the articles I changed the class to stub. Even the four articles you've written so far show your writing talent off, so I look forward to great contributions which you can list on your User page. dawnleelynn(talk) 17:49, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Dawnleelynn: Improving stubs can be rewarding. The lives of others can be very inspirational. I found many amazing people, especially women who deserve much recognition. SWP13 (talk) 22:55, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- I have no doubt you are right on all counts. It's just that right now I'm trying to create women articles for the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red which I joined last summer and expanding articles doesn't increase the article count. Happy editing! dawnleelynn(talk) 23:08, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Stubs to expand
[edit]Here's the list you asked for:
- Prissila Howard
- Denisse Franco
- Souphaphone Somvichith
- Jenny Kim
- Mariuccia Mandelli
- Samantha Colas
- Olga Cossettini
- Stanisława Celińska
- Carmen Muñoz Guzmán
- Kate Mansi
Doesn't seem too large? :) dawnleelynn(talk) 19:50, 12 February 2019 (UTC) p.s. I thought there would be more actually, considering the history and how long it took me to look through it, LOL. It's all good though. dawnleelynn(talk) 21:18, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- >>@Dawnleelynn: OK, thanks.SWP13 (talk) 22:45, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Southern California Regional mini Unconference
[edit]At the request of other users/editors, the schedule for the Southern California Regional mini Unconference has been changed to 5:20PM PST / 1720 until 7:30PM PST / 1930. We hope you still can attend the event.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 05:36, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- >Thanks for letting me know.SWP13 (talk) 05:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Attendance appreciation
[edit]
|
Southern California Regional mini Unconference tchotchke |
| Thanks for attending the Southern California Regional mini Unconference, in Chinatown, Los Angeles, in March 2019. Without your attendance, the event would not have been the success it was! We look forward in seeing you again at our future events. RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 03:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC) |
- >>@RightCowLeftCoast:, Thanks for setting up this event.SWP13 (talk) 04:05, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
Kuo-Chen Chou
[edit]I can't make the editor stop. I just keep making corrections to get the article off the CS1 maintenance list. There are even more cite problems than I thought: missing authors, missing journals, incorrect dates. These are just the ones I noticed.User-duck (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
Barnstar Award
[edit]
|
The Cleanup Barnstar | |
| This barnstar is awarded to SWP13 for her diligent work to improve hundreds of articles. Your work is noticed and appreciated. dawnleelynn(talk) 03:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC) |
>>Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 18:58, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Reiko Nakano
[edit]I'm uncertain that Reiko Nakano passes Wikpiedia's notability requirements. Regarding the article you wrote (you wrote nearly all of it, right?), there are immediate problems, such as sourcing. You cannot use the following as sources: IMDB, Musicbrainz, and YouTube. Please read more of Wikpedia's documentation on notability and finding reliable sources. Thanks.
Vmavanti (talk) 19:24, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi SWP13 and Vmavanti. Agree regarding the first two sites. However, there is no blanket ban on YouTube. See WP:YTREF and WP:YOUTUBE. I would have a much smaller article for my article on War Paint if I could not cite two YouTube videos by the owners of the now deceased horse. Additionally the ProRodeo Hall of Fame and the Professional Bull Riders regularly publish videos; and it is easy to check their authenticity. I often use these videos in rodeo articles for people and livestock. Happy Trails! dawnleelynn(talk) 19:40, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree there is no blanket ban against YouTube. But in jazz articles, where I spend nearly all my time, I rarely see it use correctly. That is why I caution against it. Regardless, much of the information in this article is excessive and promotional even if it were sourced correctly. This is a double problem when you consider that the subject of the article may not be notable. The more you pile on, the more it looks like grasping at straws. If I were you, I would read carefully and repeatedly the documentation about notability and reliable sources before doing anything more.
–Vmavanti (talk) 20:33, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
- I agree there is no blanket ban against YouTube. But in jazz articles, where I spend nearly all my time, I rarely see it use correctly. That is why I caution against it. Regardless, much of the information in this article is excessive and promotional even if it were sourced correctly. This is a double problem when you consider that the subject of the article may not be notable. The more you pile on, the more it looks like grasping at straws. If I were you, I would read carefully and repeatedly the documentation about notability and reliable sources before doing anything more.
>>Noted as resolved by User:dawnleelynn. :) SWP13 (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2019 (UTC)
Wiki event in September 2019
[edit]Event for September 1, 2019 - Wikipedia:Meetup/San Diego/September 2019
"Horizon/Nova" archive
[edit]TVM for finding the archive of Fusion: The Energy of Promise. I was one of the Producer/Director/Writers of that show. The other was Mick Jackson, who went on to Hollywood fame. Both of us are now retired in California. Stu (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2019 (UTC) >>@StuHarris:, Noted as comment on edits at List of Nova episodes. SWP13 (talk) 14:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Reference/Citations Errors
[edit]9-3-2019 Submitted problem to Wikipedia:Help desk#Reference/Citation Errors. See 2 module suite after 2 September 2019.
- Problem seemed resolved now.SWP13 (talk) 23:49, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Please be more careful with referencing
[edit]You put a reference on the wrong sentence when editing William Royer. You will see my edit here[] where I removed the reference on the sentence where he was buried. It didn't belong there but on the sentence prior to that (and where it was originally before your edits). The obituary makes no mention of where Royer is buried....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:35, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
>>@WilliamJE: Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 02:49, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Wish
[edit]Hello. Help improve the article Akane Yamaguchi. Thanks you very much. Cebuah (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
>>@Cebuah: Please be specific. You can provide reference for places that has "citations needed". SWP13 (talk) 02:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
- Cebuah is a sockpuppet of Fdery, who makes these disruptive requests of random users. You are welcome to ignore such posts, and feel free to remove them from your talk page.-gadfium 03:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
>>@Gadfium: Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 06:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, SWP13, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad to see you've already created a few interesting biographies of women and that you now intend to create or expand many more. In this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:04, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
>>@Ipigott: Thanks. I want to join the Oct-Dec stub contest. I assume any article of notable women is acceptable, including ones not listed in the red link index. ..such as Cynthia A. Johnson, Lori Stone, Brenda Carter, etc. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 00:57, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you
[edit]For such good faith. And you're welcome for cleaning up after your sloppy, previous edit. Toddst1 (talk) 17:31, 18 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WiR stub contest winner
[edit] | Winner: Destubbing: Women in Red stub contest, October 2019 |
Congratulations, SWP13, with 8 destubbed articles, you are the winner of the destubbing section of the October contest. I suggest you include this award on your user page.--Ipigott (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2019 (UTC) >>@Ipigott:, This was a difficult contest. Thank you. SWP13 (talk) 16:22, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Undeletion of article - American who received Russian political asylum: John Mark Dougan
[edit]How R U swp? 😀
From your contributions, I notice you are interested in Russian/USSR spy articles.
I created
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2019_October_22 for John Mark Dougan He is a Florida Sheriff who fled America for Russia three years ago.
I am new to this process but from what I have seen it seems difficult to undelete an article. Any help that you can provide would be most helpful!
The deleted article is here: User:Moscowdreams
☯️☯️☯️ Moscowdreams (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Response>>>@Moscowdreams:, My username is SWP13. Your assumption about my interest is incorrect. Please visit Requests for undeletion. SWP13 (talk) 16:29, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beth Griffin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Van Buren County (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
Response>>Fixed it.SWP13 (talk) 07:57, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WiR stub contest second place
[edit] | Second Place: Destubbing: Women in Red stub contest, November 2019 |
Congratulations, SWP13, with 10 destubbed articles, you have gained second place in the destubbing section of the November contest.--Ipigott (talk) 14:18, 1 December 2019 (UTC) >>@Ipigott: Thanks. SWP13 (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
If you have an opinion
[edit]Regarding the AfD discussion, of this article that you've edited. plese feel free and stop in and express it. Cheers. 67.167.8.141 (talk) 05:15, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Response>>See Hayley McLaughlin's talk page. SWP13 (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
December 2019
[edit] Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Hi SWP13, again I would direct you to policy in situations like this. iMDb does have some contentious use cases because it can be edited by anyone. Check here: Citing iMDb. It lists some items that are a green light to use and some that are not. The editor that removed your references probably did so in good faith. I can say that I have seen iMDb references removed from articles many times, including on my articles when I was beginning editing. Additionally, it would be nice if the editor had explained the edit in the edit summary. dawnleelynn(talk) 17:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Response>>@IanDBeacon:, @Dawnleelynn:, At least I tried to bring the article to a better state than previous months. Someone is very determined to delete this one. You can help by voting at the Afd link. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 18:43, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I did not look at the article. I have real life to atttend to right now. But, I will check out the afd later today and if it is worth saving, I will contribute. I am glad there are editors like you trying to improve articles. Thanks for pointing that out. dawnleelynn(talk) 19:33, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2020! |
|
Hello SWP13, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2020. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Response>>@Dawnleelynn: Merry Christmas. SWP13 (talk) 16:33, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
Talk 2020
[edit]WiR stub contest December second place
[edit] | Second Place: Destubbing: Women in Red stub contest, December 2019 |
Congratulations, SWP13, once again! With 10 destubbed articles, you have gained second place in the destubbing section of the December contest.--Ipigott (talk) 13:45, 1 January 2020 (UTC) >>@Ipigott:, Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 19:14, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit]
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Speedy deletion nomination of Jake Ellis
[edit]Hello, SWP13,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Crystallizedcarbon and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged an article that you started, Jake Ellis for deletion, because it seems to be an article that has been already decided by a consensus decision to be unsuitable for inclusion.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Crystallizedcarbon}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:59, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
>>My comments: see Talk:Jake Ellis, SWP13 (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
   Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Sorry for bothering you, but...
[edit]
- New Page Patrol needs experienced volunteers
- New Page Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles. We could use a few extra hands on deck if you think you can help.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; Wikipedia needs experienced users to perform this task and there are precious few with the appropriate skills. Even a couple reviews a day can make a huge difference.
- If you would like to join the project and help out, please see the granting conditions and review our instructions page. You can apply for the user-right HERE. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here)(click me!) 20:46, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
>>Responded on your talk page.
April 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
General sanctions for Coronavirus disease 2019
[edit]
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:43, 26 March 2020 (UTC)
>>Noted that I was one of a few who discovered discrepacies.SWP13 (talk) 15:01, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Isaac Robinson (politician)
[edit]
On 31 March 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Isaac Robinson (politician), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Indefensible (talk) 20:59, 31 March 2020 (UTC)
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted. Will try.SWP13 (talk) 22:03, 29 April 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An article you recently created, Gary Bric, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. LefcentrerightDiscuss 12:33, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi SWP13! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
July 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 19:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 18:00, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 04:43, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Regina Hing Yue Tsang
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Regina Hing Yue Tsang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Northern Escapee (talk) 06:38, 13 October 2020 (UTC)
Response>>Speedy Delete tag has been removed.SWP13 (talk) 14:26, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Theroadislong (talk) 15:41, 13 October 2020 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
>>Noted. SWP13 (talk) 14:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- 1972 in film
- added a link pointing to Lily Ho
- Intimate Confessions of a Chinese Courtesan
- added a link pointing to Lily Ho
- List of Hong Kong films of 1972
- added a link pointing to Lily Ho
- Princess Iron Fan (1966 film)
- added a link pointing to Lily Ho
- The Water Margin (film)
- added a link pointing to Lily Ho
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
>>Fixed disambiguation links.SWP13 (talk) 06:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 15:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Gam Lau, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 14:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Second place WiR October Asia contest
[edit]Congratulations, SWP13. With 13 new articles, you have tied with Naushervan for second place in the October contributions to our Women in Red Women in Asia contest. Here is a user box award which you can add to your user page:
 | October second place: Women in Asia: WiR Women in Asia contest, 2020 |
. We look forward to further contributions in November. Well done!--Ipigott (talk) 10:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Reply>>@Ipigott:, Thanks. I really enjoyed the challenge. Many of the articles I updated have multiple names and sometimes difficult to identify the surname.SWP13 (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]|
|
Women in Red Women in Asia contest |
| SWP13 Second Place (tie) October 2020 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 16:27, 3 November 2020 (UTC) |
Reply>>@WomenArtistUpdates:, Thanks. I really appreciate your barnstar. Hope you will participate this month.SWP13 (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Comment>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 17:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Cecelia Lee Fung-Sing
[edit]Hi the article Cecelia Lee Fung-Sing you created is currently at new pages patrol. At the moment it is sourced only to hkmdb which isn’t acceptable as a source on Wikipedia. There are many other articles about Hong Kong actresses so if Cecelia Lee Fung-Sing is it able there must be others for her too. If you are able to find additional reliable independent sources the article will pass. If not it is likely to be sent back to draft or put up for deletion. All the best Mccapra (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Comment>>Has sufficient ref.SWP13 (talk) 17:46, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
December with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 05:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
Women in Red Women in Asia contest |
| Honorable mention ! Thank you for your November 2020 additions SWP13 - 21 articles WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:26, 1 December 2020 (UTC) |
Reply>>@WomenArtistUpdates:, Thanks. SWP13 (talk) 05:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]|
|
Hi SWP13! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December Women in Red Asia Contest
[edit]
|
Women in Red Women in Asia contest |
| SWP13 Third Place December 2020 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:31, 1 January 2021 (UTC) |
| December third place: Women in Asia: WiR Women in Asia contest, 2020 |
>>Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 08:50, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
3rd place! Women in Asia contest | Oct-Nov-Dec 2020
[edit]42 articles! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
| 3rd place Women in Asia: WiR Women in Asia contest, 2020 |
>>Thanks.SWP13 (talk) 09:01, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
Talk 2021
[edit]
The article Sally Kwok has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG, and definitely doesn't meet WP:NACTOR.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 16:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Two years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
>>Thanks for remembering.SWP13 (talk) 04:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Your request at Wikipedia:WikiProject Hong Kong/Requests
[edit]Hi. I have just created Patrick Lung per your request. The request has been archived. Feel free to improve the artricle. ~ Ase1estet@lkc0ntribs 08:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
>>Thanks. You are awesome.SWP13 (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 20:44, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging >Noted. SWP13 (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Gam Lau
[edit] Hello, SWP13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gam Lau, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Emily Gabel-Luddy for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Gabel-Luddy, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emily Gabel-Luddy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
COI Editor with Hiya requests help
[edit]Hello User:SWP13. My name is Mike, or User:Mferr1986, and I work for Hiya (company). You helped my predecessor, User:Lizhpowell, with updates to the article. As it is in need of updating again, I was hoping you might have time to help by making a couple of edits to the info box. Our employee count is now 150, and we have promoted Kush Parikh to president (formerly COO). There are other revisions that, I think, would improve the article, but the info box seems like the logical place to start. Thanks in advance! Mferr1986 (talk) 17:09, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Hong Kong films of 1967, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Song of Tomorrow.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
>>Fixed.SWP13 (talk) 06:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
In re your !vote
[edit]Your example isn't a good one, as that particular politician was also a state-level elected official (Florida HoR). Dougher doesn't even have that going for her. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 02:52, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>Noted. SWP13 (talk) 23:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 05:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Gam Lau
[edit]
Hello, SWP13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gam Lau".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:33, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted. SWP13 (talk) 21:42, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Badge and barnstar for you!
[edit] | October second place: Women in Oceania: WiR Women in Oceania contest, 2021 |
|
|
Women in Red Women in Oceania contest |
| 26 articles SWP13 Second Place October 2021 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:13, 1 November 2021 (UTC) |
>>Awesome. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 01:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Mary Chenoweth Pownall for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Chenoweth Pownall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Ymblanter (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
The article Sue Worthington Bradley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP: ANYBIO - notability is not inherited
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
The article Augusta Cohen Coontz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:ANYBIO, requires significant coverage about Augusta Cohen, not mentions in passing relating to her husband (WP:NOTINHERITED). She is not notable for being married to a notable person.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 10:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
>>Noted.SWP13 (talk) 21:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Tammy Flores Garman Schoenen moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Tammy Flores Garman Schoenen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 09:17, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
>>No longer a draft.SWP13 (talk) 22:08, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
Badge and barnstar for you!
[edit] | November second place: Women in Oceania: WiR Women in Oceania contest, 2021 |
|
|
Women in Red Women in Oceania contest |
| 14 articles SWP13 Second Place November 2021 Congratulations! WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:15, 1 December 2021 (UTC) |
>>Awesome. Thanks, SWP13 (talk) 01:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021 (Margaret Ann Jones)
[edit]
Your edit to Margaret Ann Jones has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 15:19, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
>>Noted. Didn't use the ref (ydr.com) that you mention. See diff SWP13 (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
- Sometimes content is published in multiple locations online.— Diannaa (talk) 01:14, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Talk 2022
[edit]January 2022 Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
a badge for you! - Second Place Women in Red Oceania
[edit] | 2nd Place: Women in Oceania: WiR Women in Oceania contest, 2021 |
WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:50, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
>>Noted. Belated thanks.
February with Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Precious anniversary
[edit] | |
| Three years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
March editathons
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:46, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The article Kayleigh Gilbert has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NACTOR
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 04:27, 25 March 2022 (UTC)
May 2022 at Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
[edit]
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Notice of Deletion Proposal: List of Montana state Representatives
[edit]The article List of Montana State Representatives has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 24vikie (talk) 17:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
You have been pruned from a list
[edit]Hi SWP13! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.
Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Members.
Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:36, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year
[edit]
.jpg)
I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! 
Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. ~ dawnleelynn (talk) 21:39, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting
[edit]
|
Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Aaron Pilkington
[edit]I'm a reporter in Arkansas and noticed that you edited state Rep. Aaron's Pilkington's page at one time, saying that he had been removed as high school class president in West Virginia via a coup de etat. Do you have any information you can share about this? You can email me at griffincoop@arktimes.com. Thanks! 2600:1700:9E10:5C80:51C0:7245:C8B5:C5B8 (talk) 18:45, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 05/09/2023
[edit]
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]|
|
Women in Red 8th Anniversary |
| In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit]
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikimedia US Mountain West online meeting 08/08/2023
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
September 2023 at Women in Red
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
[edit]
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
US Mountain West online meeting November 14
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:11, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:24, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Wikimedia U.S. Mountain West Online Meeting
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Rescheduled online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West 05/21/2024
[edit]The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
An invitation to a U.S. Mountain West online meeting
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
The Wikipedia users of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are invited to an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. There is no obligation to participate and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:03, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:45, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Online meet - November 12, 2024
[edit]|
|
| Wikimedia US Mountain West |
We will host an online meet for Wikipedia users from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 12, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. We will have reports from WikiConference North America 2024. We hope to organize a North American Hub to support local activities. Anyone interested in the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.
If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our invitaion list. Thanks.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)