User talk:Nizil Shah/Archive 12
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Nizil Shah. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 |
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:11, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote
Dear Nizil Shah,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:04, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
WikiCup 2020 July newsletter
The third round of the 2020 WikiCup has now come to an end. The 16 users who made it into the fourth round each had at least 353 points (compared to 68 in 2019). It was a highly competitive round, and a number of contestants were eliminated who would have moved on in earlier years. Our top scorers in round 3 were:
Epicgenius, with one featured article, 28 good articles and 17 DYKs, amassing 1836 points
The Rambling Man , with 1672 points gained from four featured articles and seventeen good articles, plus reviews of a large number of FACs and GAs
Gog the Mild, a first time contestant, with 1540 points, a tally built largely on 4 featured articles and related bonus points.
Between them, contestants managed 14 featured articles, 9 featured lists, 3 featured pictures, 152 good articles, 136 DYK entries, 55 ITN entries, 65 featured article candidate reviews and 221 good article reviews. Additionally, 
MPJ-DK added 3 items to featured topics and 44 to good topics. Over the course of the competition, contestants have completed 710 good article reviews, in comparison to 387 good articles submitted for review and promoted. These large numbers are probably linked to a GAN backlog drive in April and May, and the changed patterns of editing during the COVID-19 pandemic. As we enter the fourth round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them. When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met. Please also remember that all submissions must meet core Wikipedia policies, regardless of the review process.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Robert Vadra
Hey man, thanks for reverting my edit on his article, I was RC patrolling and went on to revert some vandalism without realizing I'd reverted to another vandalized revision. Just came here to clarify it was an honest mistake.Cheers! Bingobro (Chat) 08:48, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Bingobro:, thats OK. Nizil (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
Barnstar for your contribution
|
The WikiProject Film Award | |
| I, Coderzombie (talk), hereby award Nizil Shah the WikiProject Film Award for his/her valued contributions to WikiProject Film. For his efforts in improving Gujarati cinema page and Gujarati films in general
|
Wikipedia Asian Month 2017: Invitation to Participate
Hello! Last year, you signed up to participate in Wikipedia Asian Month (WAM) 2016 on the English Wikipedia. The event was an international success, with hundreds of editors creating thousands of articles on Asian topics across dozens of different language versions of Wikipedia.
I'd like to invite you to join us for Wikipedia Asian Month 2017, which once again lasts through the month of November. The goal is for users to create new articles on Asian-related content, each at least 3,000 bytes and 300 words in length. Editors who create at least four articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard!
Also be sure to check out the Wikipedia Asian Art Month affiliate event - creating articles on Asian art topics can get you a Metropolitan Museum of Art postcard!
If you're interested, please sign up here for the English Wikipedia. If you are interested in also working on other language editions of Wikipedia, please visit the meta page to see other participating projects. If you have any questions, please visit our talk page.
Thank you!
- User:SuperHamster and User:Titodutta on behalf of The English Wikipedia WAM Team
This will be the last message you receive from the English Wikipedia WAM team for being a 2016 participant. If you sign up for WAM 2017, you will continue receiving periodic updates on the 2017 event.
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
April editathons at Women in Red
Help me to improve Ra Khengar Vav
Hi Nizil shah , Kindly help me to improve Ra Khengar Vav .. want to add some pictures of Ra Khengar Vav but i am unable to do it please help ...
NPOV Noticeboard: Criticism of Swaminarayan sect
January 2020 at Women in Red
|
ITN recognition for Jyotsna Bhatt
On 13 July 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jyotsna Bhatt, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Amakuru (talk) 11:09, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
Can you give me any suggestions/feedback?
I started contributing on Wikipedia just 2 months back. I done few edits and create few articles. Am I doing any constructive work? What should be done? What is better? I previously talked with you with different name. Can you provide any type of feedback or suggestion for betterment of my volunteering based on my few edits?? Thanks in advance for your time and attention.❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 08:08, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
I have a confusion to upload this image on wikipedia commons. Can I upload this under GODL or any similar license??❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 12:31, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- I will later comment on your work after checking them in detail. Regarding image, you should not upload this copyrighted image owned by GNNL. GoDL license applies anly to the central govt., not state govts or companies owned by the state govts. So please do not upload it. Nizil (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- @Pravega: You are doing good IMO. Keep focused on such topics. No specific recommendations but work on WP:MOS. Use better and more academic references where available. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 06:09, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- I will later comment on your work after checking them in detail. Regarding image, you should not upload this copyrighted image owned by GNNL. GoDL license applies anly to the central govt., not state govts or companies owned by the state govts. So please do not upload it. Nizil (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.
Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 18:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Regarding Flugel Peter Source for Content on Niruben Amin Page
Hi Nizil,
We saw your revert regarding the content on the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niruben_Amin page, which has been given the reference of the Flugel Peter book. We would like to bring to your notice that the same book has no reference for the marriage of this spiritual master. If you glance at the book, you will not find any authentic reference for the same. It has been just written there without any authentic reference. Okay, we agree that the book is an academic reference but the book itself has no authentic reference for the same. Further, only one academic reference does not suffice, right? There should be other such authentic resources that confirm about her being married. Don't you think so? Can you look for other references online, which can confirm this fact? This will help us to be rational and fair. We humbly seek to resolve this matter with mutual consensus.
- Hello, please do not forget to sign your comments by using -~~~~. Flugel is the best academic source available for Akram Vignan topics. It contains original research so there is no reference in regarding marriage and all. If you can find any more academic sources, please point me to it. If you have an academic source which mentions the opposite thing (no marriage), I will be happy to include it as well. We do not always need multiple references to establish the same thing. More is better but single is good enough. Hope it clarifies. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 06:15, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
- Dear Nizil, we had requested you to look for more sources supporting the marriage information, not for including in the page but for you to find out how true it is. We cannot depend solely on just one external or international academic resource in terms of someone's personal facts. As a genuine academic source, it cannot state anything about a saint’s or master’s life; it has to be verified, which is not in the Flugel’s PDF book. Luckily, we had approached Flugel regarding this matter a few months ago and the author accepted that he had no idea about it and said that he will delete the matter. However, since the lockdown, the author is unreachable. So, we are stuck here. Further, we have no academic sources regarding the same.Dipalig (talk) 09:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
Who is "we" here? There can not be any account on behalf of others. Everybody work in their own capacity. An statement in article needs a reliable source. The Flugel reference clearly states abouy marriage so it is included. I can not find any retraction of the statements released by Peter Flugel. If he had not varified facts as you state, he should publish retraction of statements. Until then we can only rely on the source. Nizil (talk) 10:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
- First of all, I am sorry for writing 'we'. It was written as I am learning from someone how to write on Wiki. Talking about your reply, I could draw a conclusion that the academic resources have the topmost weightage. So, I would like to learn or know a few things more, from your experience, as I am still a learner:
- 1) Is it so that the type of source is more important than its content?
- 2) Why should we believe that an academic source always gives the best and the right content? Is there a proof for this? A proof of its research methodology is a set of proper references, isn't it? If they are missing for facts, then also should we believe them to be correct?
- 3) Don't you feel that proper MLA, APA, and Chicago style references should be given for facts in academic articles or books to prove that the content written is well researched?
- Thanking you in advance... Dipalig (talk) 14:51, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedians follow WP:RS guidelines. Thats it. If you have a problem with that perticular reference, you may ask community to establish its reliability at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 11:07, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Created a page named Ranakdevi need your help
Hello sir i have created a page named ranakdevi mahal need your help for reliable source please Raakuldeep (talk) 05:23, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
1979 Machchhu dam failure
I couldn't find enough reliable sources for the incident. Can I add some content citing Safari magazine[1]? Is it considered as reliable source? Or the content challenged and removed?❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 08:15, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- Better cite scholarly work. What exactly you will write with Safari citation? Safari is like tertiary source and may be considered unreliable by some editors.-Nizil (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
- I want to add about background of this incident(how the plot for the incident created), communication failure, Aftermath of the incident. The current version has very no or very little amount of content.❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 20:13, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- I think there is a book called No One Had a Tongue to Speak about Machchhu incident. It could be helpful. Search for more academic sources as well. Nizil (talk) 02:47, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Siddhantasara
Hello! Your submission of Siddhantasara at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 00:54, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, your time is running out for submitting a QPQ for this nomination. You have until August 12. Yoninah (talk) 00:16, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
Please add this into article with rephrasing.
He [Manilal] expressed the dark despair at its failure, which is paradoxically dissolved in the consolation of philosophy, in his famous gazal 'Kain lākho nirāshāmā amar āshā chhupāi chhe' (At the heart of a million failures is hidden an undying hope).[2]
Thanks. --Gazal world (talk) 14:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
- In this poem, Manilal conveyed the despairs at the failure and the end of those despairs in the solace of philosophy.[3]
- How is this?-Nizil (talk) 05:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Vijay, Nagendra (October 2008). "Safari Magazine, Issue 173". Scribd (in Gujarati). p. 15-23. Retrieved 2020-08-03.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Bhagat, Niranjan (1963). "Modern Lyric in Gujarati". Indian Literature. 6 (2). New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi: 36. JSTOR 23329402.
- ^ Bhagat, Niranjan (1963). "Modern Lyric in Gujarati". Indian Literature. 6 (2). New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi: 36. JSTOR 23329402.
QPQ done for Willenhall House
Hiii, just speeding up the process. Just to let you know the nominator has done their QPQ. :) VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 18:21, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
If you're approving this, please add an approval tick. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Talk about Kansara Caste.
First of all, I am really thankful to you for creating a page of our caste, i.e., Kansara on Wikipedia. So let me focus towards the point that in the Wikipedia page named Kansara, I added more content which consisted Introduction, History, etc. from Kalika Purana. Also I added some pictures too. But you deleted this all. Now, I will again add the content with proper citations. So, I kindly request you to please do not undo the contents which I will add in future. Thank You! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devanshu888 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Devanshu888:, thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. I have reverted your addition because you have not provided the references for the text you added. There are certain guidelines for writing in Wikipedia. Please read WP:V and WP:RS to know these guidelines. Without any references, no addition to the article will be accepted. So please read the guidelines before adding the text in the article Kansara. -Nizil (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have not because the sources are not online. But still I will try to find it online and will add proper citations wherever needed. Devanshu 12:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devanshu888 (talk • contribs)
- @Devanshu888:, Please find citations first before readding the new information. Add only those information which have verifiable and reliable references according to WP:RS. Note that poor quality or unreliable references will not be accepted. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
- I have not because the sources are not online. But still I will try to find it online and will add proper citations wherever needed. Devanshu 12:35, 17 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devanshu888 (talk • contribs)
WikiCup 2020 September newsletter
The fourth round of the competition has finished, with 865 points being required to qualify for the final round, nearly twice as many points as last year. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants with 598 and 605 points being eliminated, and all but two of the contestants who reached the final round having achieved an FA during the round. The highest scorers were
Bloom6132, with 1478 points gained mainly from 5 featured lists, 12 DYKs and 63 in the news items;
HaEr48 with 1318 points gained mainly from 2 featured articles, 5 good articles and 8 DYKs;
Lee Vilenski with 1201 points mainly gained from 2 featured articles and 10 good articles.
Between them, contestants achieved 14 featured articles, 14 featured lists, 2 featured pictures, 87 good articles, 90 DYK entries, 75 ITN entries, 95 featured article candidate reviews and 81 good article reviews. Congratulations to all who participated! It was a generally high-scoring and productive round and I think we can expect a highly competitive finish to the competition.
Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Can you help me for Draft:MYBYK??
Whenever I create a draft, it got rejected every time and this gives frustration only. Can you help me or provide any suggestion for Draft:MYBYK??❯❯❯Praveg A=9.8 12:14, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Rules for companies and organisations are bit strict. See WP:NCORP for criteria. Though there are some references, there is lack of depth in the coverage. The current article (especially Overview section) looks like an advertisement and it can be reduced to stub article with a simple copyediting. If there is not much info on the company in reliable sources, there should be no article on it. Few references are also not reliable sources so please remove them. e.g.FounderIndia. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 13:07, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Anwarmiya Kaji
This book is useful for Anwarmiya Kaji. --Gazal world (talk) 18:36, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
governors' and vice-governors' names in their years
Hi Nizil Shah. Can you add governors' and vice-governors' names in their years from Brazil, Mexico and India, please, thank you. | 36.67.248.129 (User talk: 36.67.248.129) Sent at 05:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, please clarify what exactly do you want. In year articles, should I add governors etc. according to their birth years? Or anything else? Regards, Nizil (talk) 08:55, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiCup 2020 November newsletter
The 2020 WikiCup has come to an end, with the final round going down to the wire. Our new Champion is 
Lee Vilenski (submissions), the runner-up last year, who was closely followed by .svg){kind=small}
Gog the Mild (submissions). In the final round, Lee achieved 4 FAs and 30 GAs, mostly on cue sport topics, while Gog achieved 3 FAs and 15 GAs, mostly on important battles and wars, which earned him a high number of bonus points. 
The Rambling Man (submissions) was in third place with 4 FAs and 8 GAs on football topics, with 
Epicgenius (submissions) close behind with 19 GAs and 16 DYK's, his interest being the buildings of New York.
The other finalists were 
Hog Farm (submissions), 
HaEr48 (submissions), 
Harrias (submissions) and 
Bloom6132 (submissions). The final round was very productive, and besides 15 FAs, contestants achieved 75 FAC reviews, 88 GAs and 108 GAN reviews. Altogether, Wikipedia has benefited greatly from the activities of WikiCup competitors all through the contest. Well done everyone!
All those who reached the final will receive awards and the following special awards will be made, based on high performance in particular areas of content creation. So that the finalists do not have an undue advantage, these prizes are awarded to the competitor who scored the highest in any particular field in a single round, or in the event of a tie, to the overall leader in this field.
- Gog the Mild (submissions) wins the featured article prize, for a total of 14 FAs during the course of the competition.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) win the featured list prize, for 5 FLs in round 4.
- Rhododendrites (submissions) wins the featured picture prize, for 3 FPs in round 3 and 5 overall.
- Lee Vilenski (submissions) wins the featured article reviewer prize, for 23 FAC reviews in round 5.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the good article prize, for 45 GAs in round 2 and 113 overall.
MPJ-DK (submissions) wins the topic prize, for 33 articles in good topics in round 2.- The Rambling Man (submissions) wins the good article reviewer prize, for 100 good article reviews in round 2.
- Epicgenius (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 22 Did you know articles in round 4 and 94 overall.
- Bloom6132 (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 63 In the news articles in round 4 and 136 overall.
Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2021 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66, Vanamonde and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Carlos G. Vallés
On 11 November 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Carlos G. Vallés, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Dumelow (talk) 10:30, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Happy Diwali 2020
Hello Nizil Shah,
Hope you are doing well.
Wishing you a happy, safe, and prosperous Diwali. Stay safe. Regards.
--Titodutta (talk) 22:00, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
AfD notice
Hi. Please see this AfD following on from the RfC you commented on. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December with Women in Red
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Bhutan India relations
I generally agree with your expressed view, but there is some confusion as to what exactly the Govt of India has requested from WMF. Since it seems that it is about the Aksai-Chin issue, the letter appears motivated and any proactive moves by us will have much wider implications throughout wikipedia. So let us not be hasty. Cheers Aghore (talk) 05:42, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
There is no hurry. I requested the change in accordance with our neutrality guidelines. We need to fix this for our guidelines. Political bickering is never heard by Wikipedians. There is long history people complaining about Wikipedia to Indian Government on Twitter. I think they took it too seriously this time. Yeh, but don't forget that map needs correction. Nizil (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Hasu Yajnik
On 14 December 2020, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Hasu Yajnik, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Dumelow (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Tasnim Mir for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tasnim Mir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasnim Mir until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zoglophie Write? 18:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Manobina Roy
Hello, Nizil Shah. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manobina Roy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:24, 17 December 2020 (UTC)
please rename krishna janmsthan temple as krishna janmbhoomi
i had earlier renamed it but you changed its name back .So i want to have a formal and polite discussion. Hindus believe that place to be krishna janambhumi(birthplace like ram janmbhoomi) evan hindi wiki title page is कृष्ण जन्म भूमि. Even U.P government also calls it as( JANMBHOOMI https://mathura.nic.in/tourist-place/shri-krishna-janambhumi/) You would not be knowing hindu culture but hindus believe it so that is true.Also you deleated eidgah mosque page just because u want to hide truth and are biased.Whwn even congress historians are saying aurangzeb destryed the mosque.\ You are deleating it If you are a true deserving wiki admin donnt block me and wwrite the truth. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/astrology/religious-places/unknown-facts-about-krishna-janmabhoomi/articleshow/68206163.cms
https://haribhakt.com/truth-and-facts-about-shri-krishna-janam-bhoomi-mandir/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmu3212 (talk • contribs) 07:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
@Redmu3212:, thank you for engaging in discussion. First, I am not Wikipedia administrator and I have not deleted Eidgah article either. So you should contact the concerned person for it. Ragarding title, Janmasthan and Janmabhumi are the same thing. Both mean 'place of birth'. So there is no point in changing the name. "Janmasthan" is kept because the official website of the temple call itself "Janmasthan" temple. Anyway both are same thing so it is irrelevant. If you have any compelling argument for changing name, engage in the discussion on talkpage where others will participate. I think the name change is unnecessary. Nizil (talk) 11:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Krishna Janmabhoomi also redirect to the same article. Nizil (talk) 11:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Regarding "still exist" which you keep adding, it is already clear that it still exist so there is no need to write it. It is already mentioned in the next sentences that the new temple complex was built adjacent to "mosque". So it is self-evident that it is still there. Nizil (talk) 12:01, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
still exist then let it be there to make it easy to understand — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmu3212 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
You would not be knowing hindu culture but hindus believe it so that is true.Also you deleated eidgah mosque page just because u want to hide truth and are biased.Whwn even congress historians are saying aurangzeb destryed the mosque.\ You are deleating it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmu3212 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- I have already answered both things. Please stop repeating yourself. Nizil (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 1990 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2020 (UTC)Season's Greetings
| File:Christmas tree decorations 1.jpg | Merry Christmas and Happy New Year |
| Holiday season's greetings to you and your family. I hope you are well and wish you a happy new year too. Whispyhistory (talk) 18:01, 24 December 2020 (UTC) |
- @Whispyhistory:, Happy holidays and Happy New Year. I hope 2021 will be better than this one on-wiki and off-wiki as well. We had good collaborations this year. Looking forward to more. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 05:29, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
who are you
It seems that you are MISUING YOUR WIKI PRIVILIGES ARE YOU A HINDU OR KNOW ABOUT HINDU CULTURE THEN IS IT FAIR TO INTERFERE WHAT IS I TOUCH A PAGE OF OTHER RELIGION WHICH I AM NOT PRIVILIGES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Redmu3212 (talk • contribs) 03:41, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the 2021 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The competition begins today and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. We thank Vanamonde93 and Godot13, who have retired as judges, and we thank them for their past dedication. The judges for the WikiCup this year are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Iqbal Qureshi
Hi Nizil, may I ask you to watch over this while I attempt to figure it out? Whispyhistory (talk) 21:45, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: Added to watchlist for 3 months. I will improve wherever needed.-Nizil (talk) 05:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you...apparently there were 2 Iqbal's and their filmography are sometimes mixed up eg Sipahsalar (1956). Whispyhistory (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: Ohh, I did not know that. Please correct mistakes. -Nizil (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- As always thanks for your edits. Some of the references were confusing. Whispyhistory (talk) 22:02, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Whispyhistory: Ohh, I did not know that. Please correct mistakes. -Nizil (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you...apparently there were 2 Iqbal's and their filmography are sometimes mixed up eg Sipahsalar (1956). Whispyhistory (talk) 06:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Please explain me how can I upload an image with tag of free availability
U hv marked photo uploaded by me of lord Mahavira's Kalyanaka for deletion but let me say that it is freely available online everywhere I know it's not my own work but I don't know how to give a tag for freely available online images. Please explain me how can I upload an image with tag of free availability or some tag which can withstand the deletion. Please reply ASAP. And it's available at here also http://www.jaina.org/resource/resmgr/021916_eblast/Bhagwan_Mahavir_Diksha_Kalya.pdf
- Please do not forget to sign your comments with -~~~~ which will appear as your username when saved. Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons does not accept images violating copyright of others due to legal reasons (see image policy WP:IMAGEPOL). The above mentioned image is copyright of someone else so we can not upload here. You can post images taken by yourself as they are your own copyright. Freely available does not mean Freely licensed. Everything on the internet is copyrighted unless clearly mentioned about free license. So please do not upload that image. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and repeat offenders are banned. Please do read WP:IMAGEPOL. Hope it clarifies. Feel free to ask any question. -Nizil (talk) 17:21, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Hi.. (personal question)
Where do you stay? I stay at around tardeo Mumbai...
- @Rishabh.rsd: Well, it is not a good place to reveal my personal information. Most Wikipedians do not reveal much about their personal lives. Though I can tell you that I am interested in Gujarat and Gujarati culture. I am familiar with and interested in Jainism topics as well. Feel free to collaborate with me or ask for help/advice. Wikipedia have plenty of places where help are available. Do read guidelines and policies or at least give them some cursory glance so you can learn. I will be happy to help. Regards,-Nizil (talk) 17:25, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Rajputisation
Hi Nizil, on a number of Rajput clan pages (Jethwa, Jadeja possibly others) there is a user who is adding a pre-written paragraph about Rajputisation regardless of whether it applies to the specific clan or not using the same sources in each (again regardless of whether it is related or not). Is there anyway to contest this?TSAray (talk) 21:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
- @TSAray:, Sorry for late reply. Please give me link of article or revision where it happened. So I can investigate. -Nizil (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah:, Apologies for late reply, had been off wiki. This seems to have been removed although the Jadeja article remains contentious as ever.TSAray (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah: Please see this article on the Jethwa dynasty where this issue still exists. TSAray (talk) 00:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Nizil Shah:, Apologies for late reply, had been off wiki. This seems to have been removed although the Jadeja article remains contentious as ever.TSAray (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
DYK for Iqbal Qureshi
On 17 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iqbal Qureshi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Iqbal Qureshi composed the music for the 1964 film Cha Cha Cha, the first Indian film to feature Western dance? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iqbal Qureshi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iqbal Qureshi), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.