User talk:Redmu3212

October 2020

Hello, I'm QueerEcofeminist. I noticed that in this edit to Mir Osman Ali Khan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. QueerEcofeminist^{"cite! even if you fight"!!!} [they/them/their] 08:28, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Balon Greyjoy. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Y. V. Subba Reddy, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Balon Greyjoy (talk) 07:09, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change infoboxes as per your POV. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Asartea. I noticed that in this edit to Guruvayur Temple, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 05:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bro

Change catholic to just christian or Protestant christian. He is not catholic Rock200514 (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy, you may be blocked from editing. Stop this religious POV pushing. I told you multiple times that religion is not to be put in the lead as per the guideline MOS:CONTEXTBIO. See what it says : Ethnicity, religion, or sexuality should generally not be in the lead unless it is relevant to the subject's notability. Similarly, previous nationalities or the place of birth should not be mentioned in the lead unless they are relevant to the subject's notability. In the case of Reddy, if he had been a religious preacher, then only his religion would have been leadworthy, but he is not so it is not relevant. Do not unnecessarily POV push, you'll get reported. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on User:QueerEcofeminist

Thanks for your edits to User:QueerEcofeminist. If it was a test edit and you are not aware that, I will let you know that, you should not edit other's user pages! QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 15:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hi Redmu3212! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Y. S. Jaganmohan Reddy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Shivang Suman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Shivang Suman, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 10:01, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shivang Suman

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Shivang Suman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dtt1^Talk 08:12, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redmu3212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am very sorry.I had no intention to createw vandilism but forgot to provide sources.please forgive me.I will never repeat my mistake againRedmu3212 (talk) 07:56, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. This account is not and was not blocked, and the autoblock on the underlying IP has expired. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You have four open requests; you only need one. Please remove three of them so that you have a single request. Instead of clicking "new section" to edit, you should click "edit" to edit this entire page, and your request should only be placed in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header window. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of the excess. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 17:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi,Mathura)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi,Mathura) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.hinduscriptures.in/sacred-places/temples/krishna-janma-bhoomi-mandir-mathura, https://www.mynation.com/india-news/with-ram-mandir-a-reality-reinvigorated-hindu-saints-with-renewed-gusto-look-to-reclaim-mathura-kashi-qeoxtq, and https://odishabytes.com/krishna-birthplace-court-accepts-appeal-against-dismissal-of-suit-for-mosque-removal/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 82.132.213.41 (talk) 08:16, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi,Mathura)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi,Mathura) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://mvtindia.com/places/shri-krishna-janmabhoomi/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMB9 9thx my edits! 07:57, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Idgah mosque(Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hatchens (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It is confused and contradictory and it needs further work. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi) (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SMB99thx was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The first paragraph has excessive citations, while the second paragraph is not sourced. This is much more closer to making it now, but there needs some fixes to do.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SMB9 9thx my edits! 00:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redmu3212! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SMB9 9thx my edits! 00:18, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi)

Hello, Redmu3212

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Idgah mosque (Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi) for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hatchens (talk) 14:26, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

A request has been filed for the title of [[:{{{1}}}]] requesting that it be added to the title blacklist. This has been done because the article appears to be a recreation, under a different title, of an article which is itself currently protected against recreation. Please note that titles used to circumvent the protection policy are often given the same level of protection as the original title the author is trying to circumvent, or are added to the title blacklist.

If you feel that the topic of the article meets our notability guidelines, please request a deletion review or use a request for unprotection instead.

Please note that repeated recreation of an article against a consensus to delete is considered disruptive and may get you blocked from editing. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you will be blocked if you recreate this article under any title. --RegentsPark (comment) 15:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Krishna Janmasthan Temple Complex, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please do not change title of the article without discussion on the talk page. Nizil (talk) 14:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Redmu3212, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Amritsarggn‎ (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 16:24, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Hello, Redmu3212,

Why did you move Draft:Indira Rasoi Yojna to a User Talk page? It almost resulted in the draft being deleted. Please do not move around any pages to different areas of the project. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:18, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RegentsPark (comment) 22:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can't go about creating the same article under different names after it has been deleted. When you return, please stop this or else you'll be indef blocked. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:06, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

justice

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redmu3212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i had earlier renamed it but you changed its name back .So i want to have a formal and polite discussion. Hindus believe that place to be krishna janambhumi(birthplace like ram janmbhoomi) evan hindi wiki title page is कृष्ण जन्म भूमि. Even U.P government also calls it as( JANMBHOOMI https://mathura.nic.in/tourist-place/shri-krishna-janambhumi/) You would not be knowing hindu culture but hindus believe it so that is true.Also you deleated eidgah mosque page just because u want to hide truth and are biased.Whwn even congress historians are saying aurangzeb destryed the site.\ You are deleating it If you are a true deserving wiki admin donnt block me and wwrite the truth. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/astrology/religious-places/unknown-facts-about-krishna-janmabhoomi/articleshow/68206163.cms https://haribhakt.com/truth-and-facts-about-shri-krishna-janam-bhoomi-mandir/ Redmu3212 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:46, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Redmu3212, you're blocked because you keep recreating the same article without discussion. A better idea would be to keep it in draft space, add references and content, and then use WP:AfC to get someone to review it, comment on it, and then, perhaps move it (i.e., the AfC volunteer does the moving, not you) into article space. FYI, the block expires in 4 days and you might want to consider this piece of advice that I'm giving you. --RegentsPark (comment) 23:11, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

justice

i had earlier renamed it but you changed its name back .So i want to have a formal and polite discussion. Hindus believe that place to be krishna janambhumi(birthplace like ram janmbhoomi) evan hindi wiki title page is कृष्ण जन्म भूमि. Even U.P government also calls it as( JANMBHOOMI https://mathura.nic.in/tourist-place/shri-krishna-janambhumi/) You would not be knowing hindu culture but hindus believe it so that is true.Also you deleated eidgah mosque page just because u want to hide truth and are biased.Whwn even congress historians are saying aurangzeb destryed the site.\ You are deleating it If you are a true deserving wiki admin donnt block me and wwrite the truth. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/astrology/religious-places/unknown-facts-about-krishna-janmabhoomi/articleshow/68206163.cms https://haribhakt.com/truth-and-facts-about-shri-krishna-janam-bhoomi-mandir/ Redmu3212 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

justice

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redmu3212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i had earlier renamed it but you changed its name back .So i want to have a formal and polite discussion. Hindus believe that place to be krishna janambhumi(birthplace like ram janmbhoomi) evan hindi wiki title page is कृष्ण जन्म भूमि. Even U.P government also calls it as( JANMBHOOMI https://mathura.nic.in/tourist-place/shri-krishna-janambhumi/) You would not be knowing hindu culture but hindus believe it so that is true.Also you deleated eidgah mosque page just because u want to hide truth and are biased.Whwn even congress historians are saying aurangzeb destryed the site.\ You are deleating it If you are a true deserving wiki admin donnt block me and wwrite the truth. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/astrology/religious-places/unknown-facts-about-krishna-janmabhoomi/articleshow/68206163.cms https://haribhakt.com/truth-and-facts-about-shri-krishna-janam-bhoomi-mandir/ Redmu3212 (talk) 21:17, 21 December 2020 (UTC) Redmu3212 (talk) 04:15, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to engage properly with Wikipedia's editing norms, which include engaging in civil discussion to resolve editing disagreements. This is your last chance. If you make another request by pasting the same text in here, or continue editing disruptively after your block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: This user keep copypasting the above paragraph at multiple places. See my talkpage and Talk:Krishna Janamasthan Temple Complex. I think it amounts to vandalism now.-Nizil (talk) 04:50, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — JJMC89 (T·C) 07:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Redmu3212 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

no i did not copied anything Redmu3212 (talk) 08:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Yes you did, you copied a large amount of content from elsewhere to Talk:Demolition of the Babri Masjid. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

With this and this we can safely conclude that the user is WP:NOTHERE.--RegentsPark (comment) 17:01, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RegentsPark: - Also, See: User_talk:Malyalamreporter124. SQL ^{Query me!} 00:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@SQL: - Could you also take a look at Nasdfer122? Thanks. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:23, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]