User talk:Devanshu888

Older warnings and/or other comments on this page have been removed, but are still viewable in the page history.

Discuss the topics with me, here.

September 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Twashta Kasar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:53, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Dl2000

I'll surely add proper and related citations at Twastha Kasar soon. Thank You!

P.S.:The information added by Devanshu888 is absolutely correct and was added from Kalika Purana.

November 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Love Jihad, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 12:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 15:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 15:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kansara, you may be blocked from editing. Chariotrider555 (talk) 18:09, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kansara. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not appear to do at User talk:Utkarsh Singh Yadav. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chariotrider555. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Utkarsh Singh Yadav that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chariotrider555 (talk) 13:54, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The People of India as a is not a reliable source

As has been discussed multiple times and stated at User:Sitush/Common#CasteAFDs and User:Sitush/CasteSources#The_People_of_India, The People of India is not a reliable source. It is written by an administrator, not a anthropologist, and it plagiarizes British Raj era sources, which are also not reliable sources. British Raj era sources are especially noted for not understanding Sanskritization and for accepting various claims that castes made in order to secure their place in British Raj society. Chariotrider555 (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Kansara, you may be blocked from editing. Chariotrider555 (talk) 19:39, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]