Jump to content

User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 45

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Please sign your comments with four tildes (~).

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Do you want to move a page that I've move-protected? Discuss the move first on the article's talk page. If there's a consensus for the move, let me know and I'll unlock the page.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________________________________________________________

LCF (Band)

Yes, thank you for deleting my article about LCF(Band). We're only a new alternative band that would like the free publicity and "coolness" that comes from us having our band on Wikipedia. Oh and we're all about 14 so thanks for destroying some children's dreams.


Hi I made a wikipedia page for my cricket club and we currently hold the English National record of winning the National Under 13s cup which is a significant achievement in cricket within the English Cricket Board, why would the page be deleted - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wycombe_house_cricket_club we're reocgnised my the Local Professional side as having produced the most amount of professional cricket players in the County in the last 15 years as well

Shortshadyuk (talk) 14:29, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redacted edit summaries

I don't remember seeing so many edit summaries being removed before. What is the issue - could you give an example of the sorts of edit summaries that are being removed? Is this a new policy? Every time I look at my watch list I see many redactions logged and I don't recall seeing any obnoxious edit summaries in these articles. Are we just beautifying the edit history, or is there an ongoing problem with some editor? --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:07, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hadn't noticed that e-mail was disabled (who knows how much nuisance that's prevented in the last two years?). It's toggled on now. I'd appreciate an example. Thanks. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Email sent. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:32, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks. Glad that this is being cleaned up. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dj Silky

Hi,

I have written everything on here in my own words.


YOU ARE BEING WATCHED

You got a lot of nerve deleting my page!

Many lesser bands are mentioned on Wikipedia.

A band with several albums that has been around for thirty years & is currently playing has a right to be on Wikipedia.

You are being watched! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nantucketnoon (talk •

I said it was a stub. I contacted a person who knows the band well & was going to update it as soon as I heard back from him. Please, stop being a condescending authoritarian. Nantucketnoon (talk) 19:46, 16 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]


Authoritarian: Favoring or enforcing strict obedience to authority; Domineering: asserting one's will over another in an arrogant way. Nantucketnoon (talk) 06:27, 17 July 2010 (UTC) [reply]


contribs) 19:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you let me know why it has been deleted?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usilk21 (talk • contribs) 13:50, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am re-uploading the content for the above page with references. Can you please let me know if this is now ok.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Usilk21 (talk • contribs) 08:59, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The World and Wikipedia

According to this page, I should contact you about a stub which I have prepared at User:Wavelength/Sandbox 4/The World and Wikipedia. I will watch your talk page for any reply which you may have. -- Wavelength (talk) 16:57, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No need, you are good to create it if you would like. Prodego talk 17:07, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Correct, the original entry in 2007 was blanked by its creator. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you both. -- Wavelength (talk) 22:26, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly the original author of the page (in 2007) is also the author of the book (in 2009) which the new article is about. Prodego talk 01:26, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Focus Bikes

Hi there, I was going to create the page Focus Bikes, but as it was created in the past and deleted by yourself, I must now contact you as per Wikipedia guide lines. I am going to create the article based on Focus Bikes which is a bicycle manufacturer and I am not going to make it an advertorial. I presume this it not an issue and await your reply. Thanks. DubhEire (talk) 19:54, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Love - John Clare

Hi I made a page earlier for the John Clare poem 'First Love'. Despite holdon ing it, and explaining that the Copyright bot was in the wrong as the poem does not belong to http://www.romanticlovesecrets.com/First-Love-Poems.html, it belongs to nobody as this site is simply reciting the poem, you have deleted the page. Why?


Barnstar

The Resilient Barnstar
For staying composed and unhindered in the face of attacks from relentless groups of vandals and trolls. The Thing // Talk // Contribs 01:04, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Pillow Pets

I wrote an article about pillow pets earlier. After unambigous promo speedy delete notice, I added hangon tag and explained that this page did not promote any particular company or brand. Alternative/competitor brands making pillow pets listed under History. Pillow pet is a generic word for plush animal toys that can be converted to a pillow. The article informs about what pillow pet means, its first use in commerce, and how it works. Thanks


Frédéric Kristiansson

Dear NawlinWiki,

I made a mistake by creating the profile of Frédéric Kristiansson on the English Wikipedia. Indeed since he was elected as a student representative between 2004 and 2006(you can check it there: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conseil_National_de_la_Vie_Lyc%C3%A9enne ) but is not anymore, the press service could not create his page with any official login. I was mistaken by using "Ministère de l'Education" because it is a Moral Person, and therefore I checked with the administrator Peter, and renamed my account as Emartin33.

A point which bother me though is that a lot of terms are technique and requires an explanation like the abbreviations CNVL, CNJ, etc.. but they do not exist on the English wikipedia. I therefore thought that instead of putting a link to the french wikipages, I would directly put a link toward the sites of the organizations, which are translated in English: Is that also ok with you? Otherwise I am opened to any suggestions and advices. Best Regards, and sorry to have bothered you with those errors.

Emartin33 13:40, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

  • (1) You really shouldn't link to external sites. (2) I still don't see how Mr. Kristiansson meets the notability guidelines of WP:BIO or the sourcing guidelines of WP:V, so I still don't think he should have an article here. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:15, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks, then I will link to articles of wikipedia directly and just put the sites as 'external links'. F. Kristiansson was representing all the French students, which means 2 millions students at both the Minister of Youth and the Minister of Education for 3 years, and launched the debate about teaching first aid at school. He contributed to present school not only as a scholar place but also as a social one, as it is for instance in Sweden. That is why I thought it would be interesting to put him on the english wikipedia, since comparisons with other countries'educative system are highly relevant(especially since I heard he was now a representant at the European Youths, but I am not a 100% sure so I did not add that info on his page). So is that Ok for you if I re-do the article and try with attention to make it follow the guidelines you mentioned above, and with a new account(so that there is no problem of a 'moral person'). Here again, I will gladly welcome your advices and experience. Best Regards,

Emartin33 (talk) 19:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear NawlinWiki, Primerily I had to change my username because of the problem mentioned above, so it is now easier to use Discover33 (little ref to the fact that I am a newbie ;) You will find here all the infos you need to be sure that my page was reliable and relevant and that there is no Notability problems. I therefore ask you the permission to re-create it, this time following the guidelines you mentioned.

You will firstly find the visit card that we made for him[maybe delete it after having seen it because I wouldn't want anyone to use those infos]File:Carte de visite FK.jpg

and a link to the discussion between the former Minister of Education, now Prime minister Francois Fillon here, released by the Ministery of Education itself:

"M. Kristiansson. -N'est-il pas alors important que dans chaque lycée de France, les élèves puissent bénéficier de cette formation ?

(It is important that every highschool teaches students first aid)

M. Fillon. -Nous allons donc le mettre en oeuvre.

(It will be done)[1] p18

and then with the next minister Gilles de Robien:

"F. Kristiansson. -Ces lois ont-elles ou seront-elles mises en application prochainement ou votre nomination va-t-elle les modifier?

(When will the law be implemented, does the fact that you are the new minister changes anything?"

G. de Robien. -c'est une question de semaines et non pas de mois (It is a question of weeks, not months now)[2] p21


Here again, the point is not about taking part, but to show that F. Kristiansson is indeed part of the debate right now in France on whether or not First aid should be taught at school. And it is with-and by comparison- to other countries that this debate is done. So as a subject of European importance, especially since we try to take the best from every system, I do think that it is important to have him on the English wikipedia. If it is ok with you, I will also improve the page about first aid, which lakes the civic dimension of teaching students not only to be workers, but also citizens.

Sorry for that long explanation, but I wanted to highlight the relevance of this subject.

Best Regards,

Discover33 (former Emartin33) (talk) 21:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://media.vie-lyceenne.education.fr/file/Comptes-rendus_du_C.N.V.L./03/0/C.N.V.L._28_janvier_2005_22030.pdf
  2. ^ http://media.vie-lyceenne.education.fr/file/Comptes-rendus_du_C.N.V.L./02/9/C.N.V.L._23_SEPTEMBRE_2005_22029.pdf

Debate about Red Baron's funeral on Missing man formation

Someone who apparently imagines that Von Richthofen is a figure from the SECOND world war is madly reverting over a silly idea that funeral flyovers originated from his funeral. His source indicates that it is a supposition, but he insists is "useful" and "accurate". Anyway, I would appreciate your having a look at this as we need to get a consensus.--Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:25, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have this page under Watch. I am that person and take your "madly" as a WP:NPA. Let's keep it on the talkpage where it belongs and not draw in admins. I believe NawlinWiki knows me and my history. --Morenooso (talk) 22:27, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, I just checked Soundofmusicals' contribs. Looks like this is one of seven invites. --Morenooso (talk) 22:34, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
And fair enough too - this kind of sillyness (not call anyone silly - we all do silly things from time to time) needs to be speedily resolved - and no one will pick this one up without an invitation while the subject is expressed (on your insistence) so cryptically. The people I have invited were chosen from the list of people who have recently edited the "Red Baron" article, not because they were, or were not, administrators - nor because they are necessarily likely to agree with me - in fact at least one of them is someone I have had vigorous debate with in the past. This is not about point scoring, but keeping Wiki factual and encyclopedic as opposed to supposition riddled. To repeat - there is one source, and it talks about a "rumour". (READ IT!!! PLEASE!!!) Sorry incidentally if you take this as a personal attack - my intent is NOT to "attack" you - but your reverts - my opinion that they are "mad" is of course just my opinion - and in any case was not meant to imply anything about you. I do mad things every day, I think most of us with any character do.!--Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:59, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
At least one of the "invitees" has shown up. WP:NPA is WP:NPA and inviting others to an article with the same words is the worst kind of WP:NPA as far as I am concerned. I am walking away from my computer to WP:COOL. --Morenooso (talk) 23:01, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
user:Bzuk just reverted. He's one of the invitees. --Morenooso (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hi there NawlinWiki, just to let you know, your page was the target of an attack today. As the nature of the attack was very bad, I requested an oversight for them, which the oversighter agreed that they did qualify for oversight.

Sophie 00:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikitube

Just any FYI [1]. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virginia Rugby Football Club

I was wondering why this page was deleted given that several other rugby teams of the same stature are included upon Wikipedia. Running a search for rugby clubs yields teams like the Washington Renegades, Harrisburg RFC, or the St. Louis Hornets, teams that cannot be said to be any more notable than the VRFC given its history. If your concern is that the team is not "professional," then there could not be rugby pages about any of the clubs that I just mentioned. Thank you for your consideration of the matter. Duvallk (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sociopath

Hi. Back in February you fully protected this redirect, which currently points to Psychopathy. Sociopathic personality disorder on the other hand points to Antisocial personality disorder, and Sociopathy, an unprotected redirect, I've just changed to point there as well. I think that all three should point to the same place, and it seems to me that Antisocial personality disorder is the more specifically precise place (Psychopathy is a more general subject). Can you make the edit, or lift the protection? Thanks. Beyond My Ken (talk) 04:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darling Crocodile

Hi, I filed an SPI case for Darling Crocodile and the ones you blocked as abusing multiple accounts. I believe I have seen this type of username pattern before. --Bsadowski1 04:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lol - don't bother ^_^ - Alison ❤ 04:13, 6 May 2010 (UTC) (and check my block logs)[reply]
I saw you blocked a huge sockfarm, Alison. Good job. --Bsadowski1 04:14, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bagel

There are fact and keep in record for the future before unclear who brought in and what happened. You can find an article of Forbs http://www.forbes.com/global/2000/1127/0324110a.html this is the fact for the market in Japan. Bagel was not available in Japan until Bagelk imported from the U.S. Especially New York Bagel was nobody have before Bagelk brought in. The round shape of donut type of bread called "Bagel" but it was not. This is the back ground I have wrote it down to make sure the fact. and this kind of artcile you can find from Kosher News, Food Distributor Magagine and Crain's NewYork magagine. All I made a comment. So please return back the article to make more clear understanding for Japan market. Thank youFoodfinder (talk) 10:21, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

why the violence???

i just said why willki is notable on the talk page but you deleted it! --Teltek (talk) 16:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4g pharmacovigilance llp

Did they really just blank the page? I was in the middle of adding tags to it when you deleted it... wow. ALI nom nom 21:21, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Psychological Society wiki page

Hi - I am new comet to Wikipedia and I would like some advice on dealing with people who continue to include material that is incorrect and promotional on the Australian Psychological Society wiki page. A new organisation has been set up in competiton with the Austrlain Psychological Society and its members are continually placing misleading material that is suported by slanderous newspaper references onto this page. They use the reference to the Wiki page to attract new members. I have tried to include the correct and referenced positions of the Australain Psychological Society however it keeps getting taken off and replaced with theirs. I used the wiki rules and used talk to try and be reasonable but keep getting blunt threats to restrict my access!! Is it possble to protect the site to stop this continuing??Nik50382 (talk) 00:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WWM

Hi ... Could you take a look at the article again please? There are now references from peer groups (The Fatherhood Institute), a House of Commons Select Committee link to a project, and a regional news link. Thanks for your help Webnaut (talk) 11:55, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially I need one external source which describes the work of WWM to validate the article? The Fatherhood Institute which is a peer group working in the sector references the work of WWM as does House of Commons notes. If we look at the Fatherhood Institute their references do not outline their work in great detail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatherhood_Institute. My article took this as a lead, am I missing something here in the discrepancy between their article and mine? Thanks again Webnaut (talk) 12:44, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brunen IT

Hi, maybe you are a bit too fast in your deleting rigor ;-( May I ask you to acknowledge that there is a page like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_system_manufacturers ...on which Brunen IT was mentioned before I came there, but it was outlined in red, which as you know means that, on clicking the link, you're ASKED to write the missing page. That's what I did. The person who started this company is one of most aggressive newcomers in Germany's IT industry. Not that I like him, in fact I don't. But he's come to be kinda big number here, so Brunen is a name some people related to the IT industry (even in the states) might have heard of and find some info that is NOT company PR of him and not in german only, i.e. an en.wikipedia.org entry. If you feel obliged to decide who on the world market is worth being mentioned and who's not, but unfortunately you don't have the knowledge and just guess, you'd better contact another admin who is more familiar what's going on elsewhere BEFORE you destroy other people's contributions. Maybe you should've taken care of the List of computer system manufacturers in the first place. It is not in alphabetical order anyway, so it could well use some bright guy to check & clean up. Ain't that a wonderful task for a highly motivated pal like U?

And now, PLEASE, undelete the text. Thanx.--Gressenicher (talk) 20:17, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hate piracy badge

Hi there! you deleted this post under "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD#A7"; pls take a look at this line "web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant". here "Hate piracy badge" article got importance. It will help people to fight against piracy. It's not someone's or a website's interest, it's all human being's interest. Pls advice. Adnandx (talk) 21:24, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy of "ANTIQUITIES Ministry"

Heya NawlinWiki. This was my first ever WP:PROD. I would have tagged it under CSD#Articles#A7 but Twinkle disagreed. Was my PROD thus appropriate?--Shirt58 (talk) 11:51, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

you got an admirer

Special:Contributions/Hurricanekatrinazeal. —Soap— 14:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beauty Queen

I think it is a great source. She is an idol and has gained attention from multiple labels. Why don't see why the account would not be deserved? When they have others that have done less. Please tell me that all the info isn't gone. --PurpleLacyLue 14:54, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleLacyLue (talk • contribs)

Hmm

I don't see how the page was promotional? It just gave facts nothing more. I'm starting to think that this is favoritism, if not with all of her titles put together I still think she should be listed on here. :/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by PurpleLacyLue (talk • contribs) 15:02, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Webb article

Hi there. I was going to create a page about voice actor Jane Webb, but it seems that a page entitled "Jane Webb" has already been deleted twice; first by Wknight94, then by you.

Was that page about the same Jane Webb, or a different one? If the same one, why was it deleted?

Wrightaway (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It was a different person (in the first case) and it was a test page the second time.  Frank  |  talk  18:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Frank is correct -- feel free to start a page about the voice actor. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nip one more Grundle sock?

Learn something - read a book today! (talk · contribs). I can do the formal SPI if we need, but since you just did "It says ANYONE is allowed to edit" a moment ago... Grundle posted a list of articles of his that I should "review", Chanin v. Teva was a creation of this particular sock. Tarc (talk) 19:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Porn creep

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Porn creep. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Feinoha Talk, My master 21:10, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Schnunzi

I am baffled. What is this user attempting to achieve at Shakin' Stevens ? 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 20:14, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block of Zzzax 937

I see you blocked Zzzax 937 (talk · contribs) for abusing multiple accounts. Here is another - Strong Guy 1420 (talk · contribs) --Biker Biker (talk) 20:35, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're number 6

I came across this page quite by accident and thought you might be interested to see that your talk page is listed here. I'm not sure if that's a good thing; I *think* I'm happy that mine isn't. Anyway, FYI. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:25, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, NawlinWiki. You have new messages at Shirik's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 11:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Drive-by vandalism

What on earth was that about - any idea? --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 02:19, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article for speedy deletion

Not sure whether I can do this myself or whether I should leave it to you 'pros' but something tells me this article needs to be speedily deleted! Hudson702 (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possible friendly-fire from autoblock.

Just thought I would notify you of this, as you will have the best knowledge of the scenario and whether the autoblock should be disabled, or the user given exemption to the autoblock. User_talk:Aclarado#Please_lift_this_unjust_IP_block. Thanks for your time, --Taelus (Talk) 14:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

your speedy deletion of fireman man

hi. not to be offensive, but i think you unjustly deleted fireman man, a page that was very recently created. if you look at the film's supposed prequel, fireman sam, it seems rather notable. i might be wrong, but i don't know, man. qö₮$@37 (talk) 18:32, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Returning vandal

You blocked Special:Contributions/151.213.103.99 two days ago. He or she has returned and vandalized the same article. Girlwithgreeneyes (talk) 18:53, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Over Nine Thousand

Hi, I recently proposed the speedy deletion of the Over Nine Thousand under the G4 criterion, as a page which has already been deleted as a result of a consensus decision, and later recreated with mostly identical content. Could you explain why this redirect does not meet these specifications? I noted that this redirect was deleted as a result of RfD process, and the discussion can be found here. Thanks in advance for any explanation, and I apologise if I have overlooked something. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 19:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete Mana Bar

I believe Special:Contributions/24.35.122.169 may have intentionally engineered the speedy deletion of Mana Bar. The person has been continuously putting the speedy notice up, despite discussion, removal, a warning, and a short block. - Zero1328 Talk? 21:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Heidegger

NawlinWiki, Jonathansamuel seems to be active again at the Heidegger article, apparently using two different sockpuppets to try to get his desired changes through. Both accounts have been told that their behavior will create the suspicion that they are Jonathansamuel socks, but they are continuing it regardless. I'm telling you about this since you've encountered him there before and are aware of the situation. UserVOBO (talk) 23:20, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

Protected again to discourage the kiddies. Acroterion (talk) 04:16, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter SerVaas

Why couldn't you give me the 10 day window to add too and finish the article? Must I write it all offline? Iu614 (talk) 23:30, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arkansas

I see that you recently "changed revision visibility of Arkansas: removed content, edit summary for 2 revisions (RD3: Purely disruptive material). Is this an Oversight function, or something any Admin can do? I have no button which says "remove revisions and leave no trace in the article history." Sure enough, I see no trace in the article history of your modification. Thanks. Edison (talk) 15:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Gary Hale Gerstenfield

A user created Gary gerstenfield, and by mistake (I hope) created Template:Gary Hale Gerstenfield. This template does not meet the speedy deletion requirements for templates, but I don't want to get into a TfD ordeal for a test template. Can you delete it? Thanks, Eagles 24/7 (C) 21:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your revision deletions

Nawlinwiki, many of the revisions you are deleting do not meet the revision deletion criteria. Please reconsider using this tool; misuse can lead to serious consequences. Risker (talk) 22:32, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I heard back from Risker and appreciate his her comments. Right now, I am limiting myself to nimp.org browser-crashing links in edit summaries (there are a lot of those). NawlinWiki (talk) 16:07, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, her comments. Cheers, Rodhullandemu 16:13, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I was just curious what was deleted from Rat. Jared Preston (talk) 17:48, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
As I said above, I deleted an edit summary containing a link to a malicious browser-crashing website. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for EO DC

An editor has asked for a deletion review of EO DC. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Stifle (talk) 10:06, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nerve Recordings. Equazcion (talk) 16:47, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators noticeboard/Incidents#Nerve Recordings

Could you comment there? SGGH ping! 16:57, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection

I've asked this on the ANI thread mentioned above but is it appropriate for your talkpage to be semi-protected if you're doing administrative actions that can affect unregistered/unconfirmed users? Exxolon (talk) 12:11, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of content on Roleplaying Game and its talk page

I have Role-playing_game and the associated talk page on my watchlist. On May 18, 2010 you deleted some content and the content summaries. I'm wondering what that was about. If it was vandalism, who was the vandal? I am asking because I am curious and I like to be aware of what controversies are brewing. If it was just random nonsense, I'd like to know that too. Is there a way to see what was deleted, or do you remember generally what it was and who it was? Vampyrecat (talk) 17:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of yoomoot and its talk page

The yoomoot page and it's talk page was deleted before I received an answer to my questions regarding it's alleged violation of Wikipedia's notability criteria. I would appreciate the opportunity to continue that discussion. As I understand, the page was deleted on the grounds that the referenced sources were no more than "brief summaries" of the content of yoomoot.com. In fact the length of the articles were standard for articles covering web apps and, more importantly, included original analysis of yoomoot.com which clearly goes beyond a mere descriptive summary. More importantly, the referenced sources were no more "brief summaries" than the referenced sources for similar web-apps which are on Wikipedia, for example Hunch (website). I would like to know why the referenced articles for Hunch and similar websites featured on Wikipedia meet Wikipedia's criteria while those supplied for yoomoot apparently do not. Lumpthing (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The following has been copied and pasted from my talk page – Lumpthing (talk) 09:09, 26 May 2010 (UTC):[reply]
Re Yoomoot - it looked to me that of the two sources cited, one was a blog and the other was essentially a wiki, which lists "15+ new sites a day" and asks users to vote on them. Neither source meets the reliability standards of WP:RS. That, plus the fact that this website is only 9 days old, indicates that it fails the notability standards of WP:WEB. If you develop more sources, please let me know. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(1) Which source did you consider a blog and how do you do distinguish between a blog and a reliable news source? You could dismiss any online magazine or newspaper as "essentially a blog"! Which source did you consider to be a wiki and did you find the "lists 15+ sites a day" comment. I think you must be mixing that up with something else you saw. I don't see how either source fails to meet the standards of WP:RS. Lumpthing (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(2) The website was not 9 days old. The website itself is over a year old while there has been a functioning web app with a participating community for several months (I can look into the exact day if you like). All that happened 10 days ago was that the community moved from being a private invite-only one to a public open-to-all one. Even if it were only 9 days old, where in WP:WEB does it say that new websites are not notable? Lumpthing (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
(3) As I said before, I do not see that the sources on the deleted page were any less reliable than the sources for Hunch (website) (that was the first similar website I thought of; I'm sure there are many other examples). The Hunch page has seven referenced sources. References 3, 4, 7 and 7 are from from hunch.com itself! Reference 5 is from a personal blog. Reference 2 is mashable.com, which is a set-up that is exactly the same as techcrunch.com, which you consider to be an unreliable source. That leaves reference 1, vator.tv, which is another tech-focused website and is MUCH smaller, less well-known and altogether less-respected than either mashable.com or techcrunch.com. Why do the Hunch (website) referenced sources meet Wikipedia's critieria while yoomoot's reference sources did not? Lumpthing (talk) 07:54, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for Yoomoot

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Yoomoot. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Lumpthing (talk) 14:09, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nerve Recordings

Can you restore that page for me? --TylerDurdenn (talk) 21:29, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion, clause G4

Hello. I actively patrol the new pages and I was wondering, I often see a user recreating the same page over and over, when this happens can I use the G4 tag for recreating deleted material? I am unsure if speedy deletion qualifies as a suitable XfD process, or whether I should use the same tag that was used the first time around. I am curious as I think it may help admins to see whether the page needs to be salted. Thanks - ηyχαμς 21:37, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sting Kickboxing Gym

Hello sir. You deleted a page I created, which is about a Kickboxing gym, which is the most dominant Kickboxing gym on the Victorian Fight scene, and Melbourne's most well known fight gym. It is not a promotional article, as it simply mentions a summary about the gym, and mentions a few well known professional Kickboxing Title holders that fight out of Sting gym, aswell as former World Champion Arthur Tsakanos. Also I've noticed there are other Kickboxing gyms, and fitness gyms which have their own wikipedia page. Would it be ok if you put it back up? If you can reply back, I would appreciate it. Thanks :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Romana2006 (talk • contribs) 22:33, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from User talk:NawlinWiki/List of things that will get speedily deleted by NW (Talk) on 22:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G11 Opinion

Hey, I just ran into this article and in my opinion, it's atrocious. I'm going to tag it for a G11 but I'm not particularly sure how strong that case will be. I'm going to tag it on the basis that I think it needs a fundamental rewrite to not sound like an advertisement. I've seen articles tagged for G11 and deleted for less but this article has a more extensive history than what I'm used to tagging. Mind taking a look and giving me an opinion? OlYellerTalktome 03:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If anything, I think that reverting it back to this revision would be best. That's the last version before the owner of the website came to contribute (see talk page for proof). OlYellerTalktome 03:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ah ok. I just moused over and saw that they weren't to the pregnancy.org site itself. I'll keep an eye on it as I have a feeling it will be back up again within a few days. Thanks for the help. OlYellerTalktome 03:33, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi.
Many thanks for the deletion; I apologize if my handling of it made things worse, I don't have a lot of experience in that regard. A F K When Needed 09:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TKE/The "Network"

It's back, apparently.[2] Thanks,--Arxiloxos (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nerve Recordings

Sir, i'd like to have Nerve Recordings restored as a subpage. Thanks --TylerDurdenn (talk) 18:53, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Wiggles

Hi it Says on my wachpage that you deleted something on the wiggles what was it? I'm curius thanks --Jena (talk) 20:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]


wow People will do anything these days won't thay? thanks for Replying! Have a Great weekend!

--Jena (talk) 22:27, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re Danica Patrick

You may wish to reduce the visibility of the other two edits by the same anon IP which were just as vulgar. Totally uncalled for and warned. ----moreno oso (talk) 21:19, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. Now, for the quad trick, can you do the same for this DIFF? I wonder what's up with these guys today? Maybe they need a hobby. This is temp vandalism. I don't know if he got cited and I need to leave for a couple of hours. ----moreno oso (talk) 22:42, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Question about reduced visibilities

Is there a board for this? I hate to interrupt you while you are on a roll as I can see your work on the Recent Changes page. I have Patrick's article on my watchlist and asked for semi-protection after you did the other two RVs. I came her article awhile back because I saw vandalism from the Recent Changes page. I don't know why people like to tee off against her but they do. Yesterday's remarks/edits were totally uncalled for. It's one thing to be maybe macho and "try to take her down a peg" which could be interpretted as vandalism in a WP:BLP if not properly sourced and written from a non POV perspective. There's other articles I have on Watch with similar attacks and if I know which board to take it to, I will. Hopefully Twain has it automated. If you reply here, I will await your response. ----moreno oso (talk) 13:33, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • There are very specific and restricted guidelines for revision deletions (see WP:REVDEL) -- the last one you listed above probably doesn't meet those guidelines because it's just one obscenity. I'll watch the Danica Patrick article. 13:52, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Cool, I'll review it and add it to my Ref list I keep on my userpage. Thanks. ----moreno oso (talk) 13:54, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wow, a new tool but it looks like the admin using has to use it with lots of discretion. It looks like you have a good handle on and are doing good work with it. Patrick has some pretty good Page Patrollers, Admins and regular editors who watch over her article for vandalism. But hey, the more the merrier. Thanks. ----moreno oso (talk) 14:02, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reduced visibility

Hello NawlinWiki,

I recently noted your RD to Aluminium. I must admit I find the use of this tool concerning, as I have no way of being able to confirm the "signficance" of the distruptive edit. If the edit was simply vandalism with some offensive language, or even directed offensive remarks (personal attacks, racism, etc.) I find the use of this tool to be in excess.

Is there any way for an established user to bypass your hiding of the revision log? The invariance of the revision log is a cornerstone of the way in which I keep track of who was editing what. How do I know how many times a given user has performed vandalism? How do I know if someone has been spamming? Because there is a log. As this is the first time I have seen this feature used, I am hoping that I will not encounter it again as it is simply rarely used. User A1 (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kender

Certain facilities within MediaWiki are not transparent to me, so would you mind explaining the following changes to me in terms of what has been done and why it has been done:

  • 14:18, 29 May 2010 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) changed revision visibility of Talk:Kender/Draft: removed edit summary for 1 revision ‎ (RD2: Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material)[3]
  • 14:18, 29 May 2010 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) changed revision visibility of Wikipedia talk:Requests for mediation/Kender/Trim: removed edit summary for 1 revision ‎ (RD2: Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material)[4]

It seems odd to me that these pages have suddenly come under scrutiny. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 21:09, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The pages aren't under any particular scrutiny -- I was cleaning up abusive edit summaries with links to browser-crashing websites, created by a serial vandal whom I think you remember well. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:21, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep up the good work! --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 07:59, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A Curious Patroller Asks:

Why, around 11:27 GMT, did you and several other users all of a sudden have to delete entries in page histories as well as some pages? It said for "grossly offensive comments", but are they all from the same user? 2D Maestro Immune Diplomat 11:35, 31 May 2010 (UTC) (you don't have to say what the comments are)[reply]

I also have some of the same curious concerns. As I can tell from some of this pages comments, others do as well. Is there any further justification for deleting entries from page histories? There seems to be quite a lot of these deletions lately.--Jojhutton (talk) 16:28, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The deleted comments fall within RD2 and RD3. Let me know if you want me to email you an example of the content. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:29, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't know how else to say it, but my concern is more toward the misuse of this tool (not that I'm saying that you are), rather than what was deleted. It has always been my understanding that "Admin Tools" were just that, "tools". Having the tools as an admin were not suppose to grant the user who has them, any special gift to make decisions without consensus. It's even more of a concern that this particular tool deletes any evidence to collborate its use. Like I said, its just a concern, but when there seems to be a larger than normal amount of deletions in this matter, I would say it tends to draw a crowd.--Jojhutton (talk) 16:48, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • This particular vandal has placed an awful lot of the same kind of vandalism over time (and let loose with a bunch more this morning). That said, I will keep your concerns in mind. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 16:56, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks.--Jojhutton (talk) 17:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good grief...

I cannot believe the gall of those freaks which lurked in the shadows and waited for their page-move marching orders. Fantastic catch. I plan on looking into getting the rights to strike the comments from the edit history; I don't want any of these little brats to have the satisfacton of returning to this site to see their damage. I swear, this site would fall on its face without you. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:32, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oh, and while I'm at it:


The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
It is my pleasure and privilege to bestow this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar on the great NawlinWiki for his unending, untiring protection of this site. NawlinWiki has faced abuse from vandals which no user should have to endure, yet he continues to protect Wikipedia from vandalism despite the vicious attacks on his person. He is a truly great vandal slayer in the mold of the still-missed RickK. Thanks for all you do. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tide rolls

Hey, NawlinWiki. My user page was moved again. I was wondering if the page could be move protected. I'm not too concerned with the moves as such, but someone has to move it back and, to me, that is wasted time. If there are technical reasons why move protection is a bad idea (or policy concerns), I'll understand. Thanks Tiderolls 18:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision deletion

I saw on the bicycle article, you changed the revision visibility of one revision per RD3. I thought that only oversighters could delete revisions, but you are not, so how did you delete the revisions? Thanks, --The High Fin Sperm Whale 04:04, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what exactly is the difference between suppression and REVDEL? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oversight means that the revision/comment is gone, with no evidence apparent to a user or non-oversighter admin that it was ever there. Revdel leaves the evidence that there was an edit, and just removes the offensive edit or comment. Also, any admin can reverse a revdel. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yorke Engineering, LLC

Hi, I was wondering why you deleted my page because I wasn't really advertising the company (I'm not a part of it, I just thought it was a significant natable company that has done a lot of important work and contributed greatly to the field). Also, I had already been notified of the "plagerism" so I went through it and redid the entire thing to make sure that it was my own work. I don't think that it should have been deleted because I didn't do any of the reasons that you gave for deleting it. Could you please undo that??

SheffieldSteel has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I don't feel any particular urge to explain this :-)
SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 12:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vanatoru vandal

The Sebastian Vanatoru vandal is active again. Old post: User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 41#Tennis hoaxes by Sebiku and socks. I have removed Vanatoru from all articles currently found by a search [5] and those which were at Special:WhatLinksHere/Sebastian Vanatoru. At least the following IP's are involved:

I have reverted some vandalism but don't have more time to investigate at the moment. PrimeHunter (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked User:Dervin10, and also 92.82.226.106, 89.123.25.186, 89.123.37.8, and 89.123.39.146, who all contributed to the page User:Dervin10, and at least some of them also made other unconstructive edits elsewhere. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:59, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for your acknowledgement that IAR is indeed a viable solution! Not all admins do this, and junk sits out there!! — Timneu22 · talk 18:38, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has been maliciously impersonating you off-wiki

Looks like someone has set up an account with the name NawlinWiki on Podblanc. See [6]. This is likely an attempt to smear you, possibly by Craig Cobb himself. I just thought I ought to let you know, so you can post a disclaimer on your userpage if you think it's necessary. FisherQueen, TerryE and I have also been targeted in the same way. Whoever created these fake accounts has also uploaded videos in our usernames with vulgar, racist, and anti-Semitic titles. Stonemason89 (talk) 20:46, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of revisions

Just a comment. I do not see the point in deleting/hiding revisions when someone has replaced some content by the word "Fuck". It may be good for vandal fighters who are not admins to see this sort of stuff. I think grossly offensive should mean exactly that, "grossly offensive" and particularly with respect to BLP. Polargeo (talk) 09:21, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I am confused by this new system. I don't understand how your edit history changes on Antarctica come under RD2. It may be my stupidity as a more occasional admin than yourself. But if so I would really appreciate your help. Polargeo (talk) 13:24, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Responded by email. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Holmes a Court

Hello. You once reverted some deletions of referenced material from the Peter Holmes a Court entry. This page has become contentious again and there are now some editors banning contributors for posting referenced material, not the other way around. Please have a look at the entry and the edit history if you have the time.Edasent (talk) 15:33, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rangeblock Request

Hello, I was wondering if you could rangeblock the 4.227 range due to continous vandalism. A user in the 4.227 range, licensed to "Level 3 Communications, Inc.", has been vandalizing articles for awhile now, especially KEWI. Below is a list of the ones that have vandalized the KEWI article over the past couple years.

The user appears to be a school-aged child after this edit was 170.211.171.186 licensed to "Arkansas Public School Computer Network".

Could a rangeblock be placed on the 4.227 range for say, a year? It would be appreciated. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 21:52, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • That's a pretty big rangeblock - even without the 4.226 IP (did you mean 4.227 on that one?), it's still a /16 rangeblock affecting over 65,000 IPs. Let me see what I can do with the edit filter instead. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:55, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • Sorry for the slow response, twas dinner time at the Neutralhomer household. Forgot about the 4.226 IP, yeah that would cause some problems. An edit filter would do some good as it would prevent some of these vandalism edits from getting on the pages. Please keep me informed on what you decide to do. Again...thanks. :) - NeutralHomer • Talk • 23:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • See new edit filter 337. NawlinWiki (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it my imagination?

Am I imagining things or has there been a lot of removing of edit summaries going on lately? I'm seeing it happen on a lot of pages I have watch-listed. Is there something going on? Niteshift36 (talk) 22:04, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mary (mother of Jesus)

Hi, I think Mary (mother of Jesus) needs semi-protection. It has hardly changed in 1 year except for IP vandal after IP vandal coming over there. Cheers History2007 (talk) 03:17, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion

I notice you deleted this article [7]. What context is missing? It is a video game whose name is 7.62 mm. A very elementary google search would have provided plenty of context: [8]. Please restore this.--Crossmr (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The article as written was about two sentences long, cited no sources, and gave no indication that this webgame was notable per WP:WEB. If you can cite sources that show such notability, feel free to recreate the article. NawlinWiki (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mottephobia

You know, I was going to "speedy delete" this myself when I found it while new page patrolling, as it had all the earmarks of a hoax. Then I found, to my surprise, that it was a recognized phobia! But you are right, it needs to be properly sourced. ScottyBerg (talk) 14:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that!

The Talk page medic Barnstar
For fulfilling that request I made to cleanse that talk page that will remain nameless, I award you the Talk page medic Barnstar as a small token of my appreciation. –xenotalk 16:58, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request

"(Deletion log); 18:39 . . NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) changed revision visibility of User:NawlinWiki/Talk:Ctrl+Alt+Del: removed content for 1 revision (Potentially libelous/defamatory)"

In the future, could you please manage your actions in a way that doesn't spam my watchlist with dozens of these changes that I can't even see asside from the notification, if at all possible? It's kinda brain-hurting.

Thankie. Human.v2.0 (talk) 23:06, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm seeing a lot of "changed revision visibility" on other articles on my watchlist as well. Frankly, I'm not even familiar with this policy/function, how long has that been a practice? It is rather confusing to see a list of invisible edits. For instance, this latest one refers to Doctor Who and the related talk page, and I do not recall seeing a "Purely disruptive material" edit on those recently, unless you jumped on in in the past however many minutes. Just curious here. Human.v2.0 (talk) 20:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:REVDEL. I'm in the process of removing a lot of abusive edit summaries left over a period of about a year by a single long-term vandal. I should be finished in the next day or two, and you aren't likely to see large numbers of these after that. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:26, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aahh, ok. Like I said, hadn't seen that feature before. Human.v2.0 (talk) 20:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article Doing business in Denmark has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. You deleted Doing business in Denmark before the prod expired. Mistake? Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:01, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Alex han

Hi

Wasn't sure if I was supposed to approach the editor that recommended AfD or the person that deleted it so I am leaving you this link to the message on nominators page

User_talk:Dawnseeker2000#Alex_han_deletion

Thanks Chaosdruid (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]


The Warrior Song

Hi

The page I attempted to create several months ago was deleted apparently because it wasn't "noteworthy enough" to merit a wiki entry.

The song has now been adopted by the second largest Military Charity in the US (Warrior Legacy Foundation) as its official theme song, is getting radio airplay in several markets across the US, Has been played at several NHL and NFL sporting events (during halftime), has been distributed (by request) to over 100,000 current and former members of the US military (including 20,000 employees of the DoD, NASA, DHS, FBI, CIA and NSA), and has sold over twenty thousand copies through iTunes. In addition, it has raised an additional 10,000 dollars for charity through direct web sales, which, along with all previous monies raised from the sale of the song, have been donated to the Armed Forces Relief Trust. Incidentally, a Google search of "The Warrior Song" or "Warrior Song" will bring up this song first, and yield at least four such results ranked higher than Scandal's "The Warrior", and Kid Rock's National Guard Song "Warrior".

Hopefully now it can be considered "noteworthy enough" to merit a page on Wikipedia. I would like to recreate it, but do not know how to do so once its been deleted.

Can you please advise?

Echosonic (talk) 21:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you undelete Jennifer Josy please?

Hi! We had both carried out actions on the article at the same time. Just after I declined deletion of the article (not a candidate for speedy deletion as notability is asserted, albeit unreferenced), you deleted it! Would it be possible to undelete it, as under the guidelines of CSD:A7, it isn't legible for speedy deletion? This will give it a chance to improve, or at the very least allow peer review at AFD. Thanks! Stephen! Coming... 09:30, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that... didn't fancy initiating a wheelwar! Stephen! Coming... 11:56, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you undelete Chicago Catz please?

Hi! I declined the speedy deletion of this page but you deleted it! Please undelete it, as under the guidelines of CSD:A7, it isn't elegible for speedy deletion as the band meets criteria number 10 of the WP:NM, as stated there: "10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. Please refer to the movie The Guardian http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0406816/fullcredits where the band was featured in the movie as well as the movie Holes http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0311289/soundtrack. I need a chance to improve the article as well but no time was given for this. Thank YouJazzfann (talk) 18:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Those sources weren't mentioned in the article. Nevertheless, I've undeleted and replaced the speedy delete tag with a prod tag. Please add the sources and edit the article for neutrality (right now, it reads like a long PR piece) before removing the prod tag. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 19:04, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you NawlinWiki for restoring the page...I have added the above mentioned sources (the movie references) under the "media" header in the article and currently re-writing the article to make it more encyclopedic, Wiki-fied and to address the neutrality issue. This should be complete within the 7-day period allotted to me by the Prod notice. Thanks again for your consideration in giving me time to correct the article.Jazzfann (talk) 21:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ds@str

what the hell man? you deleting my page before i even got to post a hangon tag. seriously, like people have told my friend qotsa37, wikipedia is not a place for perfection. draynah (talk) 21:21, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salt

Would you mind salting Kiwamu Karate Do? It appears that this might be necessary. Mr. R00t Talk 23:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

I have just done an AfD of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelin Iliev, an article you speedy deleted last May. --Technopat (talk) 23:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Makoa Kali

An article that you have been involved in editing, Makoa Kali, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoa Kali. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. jmcw (talk) 13:36, 14 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Hunch (website)

Please see Talk:Hunch (website) regarding the Template you put on the article. Thanks! --Dan LeveilleTALK 20:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Awarding you the Admin's Barnstar

The Admin's Barnstar
To honor the ongoing anti-vandal brilliance of NawlinWiki, as well as numerous other functions with the mop. I have only become aware of your laudable deeds recently, or I would have acknowledged them earlier. My sincere thanks, and also on behalf of all those who unknowingly benefit from your outstanding work! Jusdafax 03:17, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I second this, after seeing what you've previously been subject to, by certain banned users. Well done.  – Tommy [message] 03:20, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

El Dorado Ventures

Hi - I noticed you recently deleted El Dorado Ventures. I wanted to see if there was any content in that article as my sense is that it could be made into an encyclopedic article. I came across it looking at a number of its portfolio companies. If you can put the article into my userspace at User:Urbanrenewal/El Dorado I can spend some time on it. If I cannot get it to where it needs to be I will delete the article from my userspace. Thanks |► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 17:40, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I need to categorise Galapagos as a R from title without diacritics. Could you help me please? --Againme (talk) 16:21, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kyzyl-Agash Dam move protection

Can move protection of article Kyzyl-Agash Dam be removed? It's not a "Highly visible page" (diff) anymore. I have plans to rename it to "Kyzyl-Agash Dam failure" instead since all text in aritcle is about the failure and non dam specific info. --Kslotte (talk) 20:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:TylerDurdenn/Nerve Recordings

Going through the category list I found the aboue page that you restored to user space, the user is now indef blocked - what do you want to do with the page ? Codf1977 (talk) 11:38, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FIRST I ADD DETAIL AND AN ADMIN SAYS THAT IT ISN'T ENCYCLOPEDIC .. THEN I REVISE IT AND TRY TO PRESENT IT FROM A NEUTRAL POINT OF VIEW AND YOU DELETE IT ON THE PRETEXT OF No explanation of the subject's significance (real person, animal, organization, or web content):: Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I'M JUST TRYING TO SPREAD AWARENESS AMONGST ENGLISH TEACHERS IN INDIA. INDIA WHICH IS A THIRD WORLD COUNTRY , WHERE ENGLISH IS THE SECONDARY LANGUAGE, YET ALL THE OFFICIAL AND UNOFFICIAL WORK IS DONE IN ENGLISH.IN SUCH A SCENARIO IT IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO SPREAD AWARENESS ABOUT TEACHERS AND TO OVERCOME THIS DEARTH. ALL WE ARE DOING IS HELPING IN THE DEVELOPMENT IF OUR COUNTRY.AND ELT@I IS A NATIONAL ORGANISATION, IF YOU WOULD JUST VISIT THE HOME PAGE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shubhangi194 (talk • contribs) 15:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC) shubhangi 16:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Wikipedia is not a site for publicizing organizations or causes. It reports on groups that are already notable. Whether or not the national group might be notable, the chapter in one city isn't See WP:ORG. NawlinWiki (talk) 17:16, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can you delete an article that even is not written to end?

How can you erase an article that is even not ready yet? This is barefaced! This artcile is written in the German Wiki, French Wiki and Turkish Wiki. So why should be any problem to go on writing it in english? This group is one of the important attestors that German-Turkish culture has more to exhibit than hip-hop. There are cross-references (although not even ready indicated, there are (were) cross-links to other langued Wikis! There were enough criteria not to delete these articles. I'm going to recreate this.

THE WHOLE TEXT IS GONE. I'm really angry! This is BAREFACE!

I'm really thinking of reporting that! The whole work of today is gone, and not saved. This would even not happen in a "German" Wikipedia (No. 1 in deleting). Unbelievable!

Now tell me how to recreate the old, original text, the article is recreated but with a stupid small piece. Where is the rest? :-((( Alabay (talk) 15:38, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you considered you might want to complete it first before publishing? Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:39, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had saved the text in a state that was not perfectly adapted, but the complete adaptation I can only do in Wkipedia itself (seeing what is named different in English than in German). So how can one tell something about sigificance, if an article is written since years in three Wikipedias (de, fr, tr)? I Saved the text to not lose it, now I lost everything. I'm really embarrassed. Is there any ombudsman? Alabay (talk) 15:54, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here we start with a page such as User/Alaby/insertarticlenamehere and then you can work on it in peace until it's ready to go to mainspace. I'm sure Nawlin will userfy it if you ask. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 15:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alabay, not Alaby. Okay, I've managed to make this: <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alabay/The_Trial_(group)>. Can you "userfy" this (I haven't found that in my translating programm :-) ). Big problem: all other The Trial Wiki pages show an english link now :-( So please, let's quickly add this in a way that is acceptable. Alabay (talk) 16:33, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NawlinWiki, I still think it was not alright to simply delete an article without any waning! Could you be so kind to check, if <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alabay/The_Trial_(group)> fits your expectations? I've collected accurate. It is very annoying that the whole other Trial Wikis now have an English link going to nowhere. The only positive point is, that this article is, I guess, the only one with such references. Maybe one can add these to the other Wikis, too, later on. I would be pleased, if you could de-userfy the article and put it to its appropriate place. Thanks in advance. Alabay (talk) 18:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! No, my problem was not that the page was scrutinized, but that this happened without any warning, while constructing the whole thing. The next days I'll try to recollect all the categories, they are lost, too ... Alabay (talk) 20:00, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiquette Alert

I have made a Wikiquette Alert regarding you. Nantucketnoon (talk) 19:57, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pan American Productions

Why was the page I made Pan American Productions deleted. It is the company that produces a new travel show that will air on the Travel Channel in the Fall of 2010. I appreciate your help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papintl (talk • contribs) 20:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Classic book?

Hey NawlinWIki - Was just wondering what 'edit summary' was deleted from Classic book at 22:22 July 17. Was it me that wrote the RD3/purely disruptive material? If so, I apologize. Am fairly new around here, perhaps sometimes in the interest of being thorough my writing could have been too wordy. Please advise so I don't make the same mistake in the future and make more work for admins than they already have. Thanks Shearonink (talk) 00:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok...thanks! Shearonink (talk) 17:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

E-mail!

You've got one in your inbox. Schfifty3 23:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For blocking HerbEA5. Can you remove the curses at the top of User talk:HerbEA5? Also can you delete User:Lynette Scott/The little white t-shirt company for blatant advertising? Thanks again. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:39, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He's back. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
Hey there! Many times, CSD'd articles meet their maker thanks to you. Keep up the good work! :) Pianotech 22:38, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sumo Paint

An IP editor put a Hangon tag on the Sumo Paint article. I explained to them that hangon doesn't apply to PRODs, but since that's sort of a disagreement with the prod, should the prog tag be removed? Everard Proudfoot (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:NuclearWarfare‎

There is more. Time to lock it down. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 04:32, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit filter false positive report

Could you consider changing the filter that triggered this report? I know what's happening, but I don't really know the purpose of the filter since it seems to be a combination of two completely different filters. It looks like the page is pending-changes protected; is it still necessary to filter it? —Soap— 18:54, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]


David Drake (chef)

HI. Could you please restore this article. I just started working on it and he's received a lot of media coverage for his work. Freakshownerd (talk) 16:54, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Health Management Resources

I wanted to get a better sense of why you think this article is written like an advertisement. Everything is documented and referenced with lots of articles from outside sources and HMR's published research. Thanks. Weightdoc (talk) 17:55, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

HMR

Sorry but I still don't understand. That is the program. The words aren't saying it is good or bad or evaluating it - it is more of a statement and, to me, that seems neutral. It is descriptive. Weightdoc (talk) 18:19, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]


Ok. Made a change to that sentence. Hope that is better. Weightdoc (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

Can we take down the heading about being an advertisement? I am trying to work on the links and the references too. Thanks. Weightdoc (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

It is similar to other weight loss companies such as Jenny Craig or Weight Watchers. There are references to HMR in the weight management field including the first 2 references on the list Weightdoc (talk) 18:59, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

Also, while I am asking questions - I'm not seeing the references when I go to edit. Can you help me with that? Also, I think a lot of the references have been fixed. How do you change a government web page with no author except to have the page URL listed? Weightdoc (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

Swiksta‎‎

Morning I have noticed you have deleted Swiksta‎‎ twice, once because of the page blanking and another because of hoax and now it's back with a 3rd CSD, which I agree with. The reason I wanted to notify you was the first one was created by another username, however I cannot recall the name, but I would guess it was the same actual user. Not sure if anything can or will be done beyond deleting the article but this may very quickly turn into a sock puppet issue if it isn't already. Thank you for your hard work - Mcmatter (talk|contrib) 13:14, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HMR

Wondering if we can take down heading about advertisement now. Still working on references and links. Thanks. Weightdoc (talk) 14:40, 27 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

The Master Mystery

I'm not sure that it was either a G2 or a blatant A1, since asserting that it is a film "by" Houdini is surely some kind of context. It's linked from here and here as well. sonia♫♪ 15:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Will create as an article when I have time, thanks. sonia♫♪ 15:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HMR

The first 2 references (1,2) are books produced by the government - not brochures and not the HMR website or HMR produced. You can check out some of the following independent references to HMR. Additionally, we publish a lot of research and contribute to many other studies done by well-known university researchers (who publish their results in medical journals) and NIH (such as the LookAHEAD study). These are some additional references: Gail Garfinkel Weiss. Medical Economics, April 18, 2008 http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/memag/issue/issueList.jsp?id=484 Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the US. Ann Intern Med 2005 Jan 4;141(1):56-66. Hubbard B. Commercial Program and Product Review. Obesity Management December 2007. page 292 (DOI:10.1089/obe.2007.0122. I can give you more references but thought you might want to start with these. Please let me know. Weightdoc (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]

Template:Location map Russia

Please delete the template for renaming Template:Location map Russia1. --Obersachse (talk) 16:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for yuor speedy reaction. --Obersachse (talk) 16:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Twin Sister (band)

  • Thank you for letting me know about the notability requirements of a band for listing. I moved the page 'Twin Sister (band)' to my userspace while I address the issue. I believe that the band does meet notability requirements, as it has been reviewed by multiple independent reviewers, including appearing in print in the New York Times. Could you please let me know if that is adequate? I've included the links to these reviews at the bottom of the page User:ericwaters/Twin_Sister_(band). I'm not associated with the band, just a fan that saw them perform recently. Eric Waters (talk) 18:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fabasoft Mindbreeze

Hi NawlinWiki, you deleted that article. I was not the author, but I am the author of the german article [9] with the same name and I saw on my viewing-list the "english" which means, there is an english version online. When I clicked on it, I found it deleted. Could you make the english article in a subpage of my users page so that I could work on it and make it proper? Sorry for my English, I'm an Austrian user with just a little school-english. Best --Pascal64 (talk) 19:23, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Pascal64 (talk) 19:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi NawlinWiki, I have had the oppotunity to read the article. I wonder why you don't like it. It is a translation of the german article (with better English that mine would have been). There are all steps well cited by reliable sources, of course, some of them are in German. Would you please be so kind and tell me, what part of the article you do not like, so that I can change it? You may watch my contributions on de WP where you see I write many articles relating to Austria, not only to a company. Best --Pascal64 (talk) 05:03, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
On reflection, I guess it's OK. I've moved it back to article space and fixed the categories. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BestEverAlbums.com

Hi NawlinWiki, you seem to have deleted the above article which I authored. On the talk page, I gave some notability examples and was in the process of gathering some more references when the page was deleted. I was going to list the publications that the site has been quoted in and some site statistics etc, but just wanted to check that I wasn't wasting my time before I do this as I wouldn't want to spend a lot of time doing this if the page would just get deleted again. The web site is listed in the list of music databases and is a notable source on many external sites (and on several Wikipedia pages) where people are discussing the greatest albums of all time and/or the best albums of a year or decade. The site also has a lot of Google "sitelinks" listed on the Google search results which Wikipedia Wikipedia:WEB says "provide evidence of site importance and credibility." I'm not sure what else I can do to prove notability, but there are many other sites on Wikipedia with far less notability than BEA. I'd like to work with you to get the page published, so please don't take the above as criticism, because it is not. (Jgianni (talk) 16:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Been a day...how long do we wait for these promised refs to be added? Can the speedy-tag be re-added, or has that ship sailed per policy? DMacks (talk) 14:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Galloway

Hi, imo semi protection would be better there. Off2riorob (talk) 18:50, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are trying to hide the Runtshit attacks on me. By my count, there have been over 8000 of these, so you will have your work cut out! Is it worth it? RolandR (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only doing the last couple of months or so (the ones that would show up on the first page of the history). Between the edit filters, which make him use more and more absurd (and less recognizable) variations, and a policy going forward of erasing these edits as soon as they're made, he won't have the pleasure of being able to look at his handiwork. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It does seems a waste of quality contributors time to have to spend resisting the valueless additions of one policy violating person . Issues like this make me support named and verified accounts only and now that the encyclopedia is written more or less the main subjects and really only needs updating and tweaking, under such circumstances we could easily leave behind the anyone can edit position. Off2riorob (talk) 19:55, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's something for discussion elsewhere -- in the meantime, it took me about 1 hour to erase 3 months' worth of Runtshit edits. It's a lot easier for me than it must be for him. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:56, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for commenting Nawlin, understood and appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 19:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have only scraped the surface of the past three months; there have been about 500 Runtshit edits since the beginning of May. RolandR (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe the last 2 1/2 months. I think I have all of them for June and July, anyway. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Revision delete request on Brock (surname)

Could you please review this edit and revdel it if it qualifies? A bit of background: the article linked in the edit was deleted as an attack page and the user has been indef blocked, both by Tnxman307 (talk · contribs). I asked Tnxman to revdel it but he didn't believe the edit was egregious enough to qualify for WP:RD2, so I'm asking you for a second opinion since you seem to be actively using revdel. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for taking care of the Anderson Cooper talk page edit summaries. I was seeking advice on rev/del-ing the edit summaries when I saw you had done the deed. I realize I've been over-cautious in executing the rev/del, but I'm still new and learning. Thanks for taking up my slack. Tiderolls 01:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Index.html or Webserver directory index

The Index.html redirect page almost always has ranked 8 in traffic on en.wikipedia.org [10] but under the current name, Webserver directory index, it doesn't have any kind of rank at all [11]. The reason I am writing this here is because I see you have been doing this in favor of this :) Would you like to reconsider your action? Cheers, Gulmammad | talk 01:13, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not sure what you want me to reconsider. If you want to move the primary page back to index.html, please discuss that on the article talk page and get consensus. If and when you do, let me know and I'll move the page. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:15, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aw man!

I wanted so very much to delete Canadian history edit with a G11 reason of 'Canadian history delete', but you beat me to it. :( Syrthiss (talk) 11:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Massmart

Was also a copyvio of [12]. Exxolon (talk) 12:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Organsm

Article recreated for the 3rd time. Mo ainm~Talk 13:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

4th time is a charm maybe a little salt is called for. Mo ainm~Talk 14:00, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Health Management Resources

I am copying what I wrote the other day in response to your edit. I'm guessing you did not see it as I had not heard back. Thanks for your response.

The first 2 references (1,2) are books produced by the government - not brochures and not the HMR website or HMR produced. You can check out some of the following independent references to HMR. Additionally, we publish a lot of research and contribute to many other studies done by well-known university researchers (who publish their results in medical journals) and NIH (such as the LookAHEAD study). These are some additional references: Gail Garfinkel Weiss. Medical Economics, April 18, 2008 http://medicaleconomics.modernmedicine.com/memag/issue/issueList.jsp?id=484 Tsai AG, Wadden TA. Systematic review: an evaluation of major commercial weight loss programs in the US. Ann Intern Med 2005 Jan 4;141(1):56-66. Hubbard B. Commercial Program and Product Review. Obesity Management December 2007. page 292 (DOI:10.1089/obe.2007.0122. I can give you more references but thought you might want to start with these. Please let me know. Weightdoc (talk) 16:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc —Preceding unsigned comment added by Weightdoc (talk • contribs)

Revdel request on Jermaine Dupri

Could you please revdel this edit? It came in a string of 6-7 vandalism edits but I think this is the only one that falls under RD2. Also, if there is a noticeboard for these sort of requests please let me know. Thanks! —KuyaBriBriTalk 16:59, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple notices on Gilad Atzmon

How long will we keep getting these multiple "changed revision visibility of Gilad Atzmon: removed content for 1 revision (RD2: Grossly insulting, degrading, or offensive material)" notices in Watch List. I assume it's because of all the stupid vandalism in the past, but it does clog up ones Watch List. Thanks. CarolMooreDC (talk) 03:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

    • I wish I could do all of them at once, but the software isn't configured for that. I've gone back about 3 months now, so that's probably enough to keep anyone from finding any of it unless they look really hard. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 04:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Carol, do you know about the enhanced recent changes option, which can be used to group together all changes to each page on your watchlist? On your watchlist, probably only Gilad Atzmon is affected by this activity; I have dozens which are similarly being purged, and without this option I would be in despair! And all of these deletions appear under a separate "Deletion Log" tag, not under the relevant article, so I can choose to ignore them altogether. RolandR (talk) 20:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HMR

I am trying to follow up on the notability alert you put on the page. Please read my previous posts and respond. Did you want me to add the references to the article? I am not sure how to remove this alert without your response but the alert is not accurate. Thanks. Weightdoc (talk) 15:41, 30 July 2010 (UTC)WeightDoc[reply]


Lone Survivor Foundation

Would like to know why LSF was speedily deleted....was working on fixing errors, and was just notified that it was tagged for deletion. Kimberly 479 (talk) 23:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)kfranklin 479Kimberly 479 (talk) 23:37, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Well, apart from the advertising issues (which could have been fixed), this is a month-old foundation with nothing in the article to indicate that it meets or could meet the notability standards of WP:ORG. If you can find significant coverage by third-party sources (see WP:V) to show notability, let me know and I'll take a look. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:39, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll find further coverage to support the foundation. Kimberly 479 (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC)kimberly 479Kimberly 479 (talk) 23:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some articles to view...http://video.foxnews.com/v/4292494/the-boot-campaign

http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2010/06/26/conroe_courier/news/doc4c258efb7d5fa515621627.txt

http://www.khou.com/great-day/gdh_053110_seg1-95254404.html

http://www.bscenemag.com/magazines/MJ10/index.html

http://www.hcnonline.com/articles/2010/06/26/conroe_courier/news/doc4c258efb7d5fa515621627.txt 

Kimberly 479 (talk) 22:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)kimberly 479[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_45&oldid=1145838807"