User talk:DubhEire

Welcome to Wikipedia!

- - - W e l c o m e - - -

Hello, DubhEire! Thank you for your contributions. My name's Airplaneman and I just wanted to say hi and Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of the world's largest encyclopædia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name, the date and the time. If you are already loving Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field every time you edit. Again, welcome, and happy editing! Airplaneman ^talk 21:50, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Unblocked

Hi DubhEire,

Per your email to the blocking admin, Amorymeltzer (talk · contribs), I'm unblocking your account. You mentioned incidents in your mail which convinced me beyond doubt that you are not the indefinitely blocked editor, User:Garydubh. Unfortunately, you share many of his attributes; IP ranges, locations, browser type ... agus an dath sa ghaeilge i d'ainm!!. I've rechecked the case and am unblocking your account as a mistake had been made here. As the original case checkuser, the mistake is entirely mine and not the blocking admin's, and I apologise for the trouble here. Brón orm - Alison ^❤ 08:03, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to chime in and thank you for being so polite. Happy editing! ~ Amory (u • t • c) 17:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So if someone is blocked because the CU and the trigger happy CU user and Admin does not like use of the name "Dubh" or two people contributing in the same area then all ye have to do is say you are sorry and all will be well again? Alison told us that a Sockpuppet got in and changed your user name DubhEire - next time they will be accusing you of all kinds of vandalism - is this not a cause of concern for you and any user??? Dubhlinn (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same area, same group of IP ranges, same useragents, same phone, similar name. Nor did I say that anyone changed anyone's name. It's a concern that you come back here again and again until you get your own way, with scant regard for others, including this editor - Alison ^❤ 19:19, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was meaning to reply sooner, but what a pleasant surprise to see some further conversation. I understand the issues of vandalism arise on a regular basis. I have been using Wikipedia for a few years now and making a few edits without a username here and there. When I say few, I mean probably 5 over the years. Then one day I decided to setup an account and get to it after I saw clearly a few cases where the sleeves needed to be rolled up and the work done and I was well able to contribute. So off I went. I have added a number of articles to my watch list and thus far I have seen various things happen. Little tweaks here and there from different people which helped me to understand that people who create articles, will over time continually improve them. They may also adopt others or extend their interest elsewhere. I found myself doing this also and justified to do so based on what I have observed. But I also noted that pages would be vandalised, and in particular pages about schools. I think it is fairly obvious what kind of people do this particular vandalism. It is clearly not constructive and immature, which is a trait of these vandals clearly. I did notice that most of the time, immediate corrections were made to revise the changes made my other users / admin. This then brings me to this incident. I now understand that some people will make a more orchestrated attempt to vandal articles. Luckily for all the readers and other editors of Wikipedia, there are people who are giving up their time to stop and prevent further negative actions. This can only be good for the community. I was initially wondering just how I was associated and labelled a Sock Puppet. Interesting and a little frustrating, as I wondered had it anything to do with an edit I had made briefly before my account was disabled. Never the less, as with all things on Wikipedia, someone has been there and done that before (well most of the time), and there was enough information available explaining what this "Sock Puppet" business was all about as I had never heard of it before. So, a simple email to clear up any misunderstandings, and everything straightened out. So, what I was initially going to simply say a few days ago was, keep up the good work and we'll all make Wikipedia better. Also, I should thank those that jumped to my defence also. This is good for all. Also, thanks for being swift in returning access. DubhEire (talk) 23:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photographers' Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For adding photographs to many articles on Dublin. Autarch (talk) 21:15, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Merrion

To add colour to this article, you may wish to add a piece about a cousin of the Fiztwilliams'. Check out "Reginald Herbert, 15th Earl of Pembroke". Laurel Lodged (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

About the barnstar

You're welcome!Autarch (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Nice work, Dubh! We need way more photos to Irish articles, so thanks for the start - we look forward to your careear with great interest. Fergananim (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User: 83.141.122.2

Well spotted! Said editor has also added similar content to a few other articles - e.g. Slane Castle, Odyssey (Belfast), Marlay Park and Vicar Street to name a few. I've removed the Upcoming Events section from Grand Canal Theatre and left a note on the talk page about it. I also left a note on the anonymous editors' talk page. There's some suggestions on how to deal with spamming at WP:SPAM##Warning_spammers - I left a {{subst:welcomespam}} on the anonymous editors' page - playing it by ear depending on the response is probably the best action.

WP:CVU has some advice about dealing with vandalism. It also has some information about tools that may be of use. Many of these automate processes such as rolling pages back to earlier versions or warning disruptive users.

WP:UAL lists the User Access Levels and what they mean.

The Irish Wikipedians' notice board may be of interest, as may be WP:IMOS, WP:MOS and Wikipedia Signpost.

You're right that I'm not an admin - I have been around for just over four years now, so I know a reasonable amount, though there are still a few things that are a mystery to me.

Keep up the good work!Autarch (talk) 14:08, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

good work

Good work on the Blackrock article. It's a big improvement. Pma jones (talk) 07:27, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep an eye (watch) this page, so if you post a response here I'll see it.

I do know the small ruin in Blackrock park. The only suggestion I've heard about it might be a Victorian folly, but I'm not convinced.

I believe there is a small Church on George's Ave. As you head towards the sea it is on the right hand side about 100m before the Blackrock bypass. It should probably go in the list of Churches in Blackrock. From my recollection it is a 'Society of Friends' church. If I'm correct, then a reference to it should probably go in the list of Churches.

I noticed that in the list of national schools, the only one which had the religion mentioned was St Philip & James. For consistency it should probably mention the religion of all or none. My first reading of it was that we could assume all the others are catholic, but actually that's not the case.

If you don't mind I'm removing the word 'sadly' from 'sadly demolished'. Not because I disagree with the sentiment, but rather because it is not really the neutral language that should be used in an encyclopedia. ( I haven't checked if you are the one who put it in, in the first place.)

Something else we might consider is a list of people associated with Blackrock. Notable people who lived there, grew up there, went to school there etc.

Pma jones (talk) 14:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know the church and I have a few photos of the church. It is a methodist church that is not used at the moment. It looks like something might be happening sometime soon, but other than that I am amazed that it is sitting there doing nothing.

You are right, there are plenty of notable people and it is quite a bit of work to write about them. I'm working on that at the moment, it is interesting.

As regards "sadly", I may well have put that there, and no problem as I do try to be neutral, so slip of the keyboard there.

The schools, I'll sort that out.

DubhEire (talk) 15:45, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the old methodist church was beside the old library? The 'Society of Friends' church is even smaller and is in a residential area and I was under the impression that it is still in use. It is much further away from the sea. That said, if I'm wrong then it won't be the first time. Pma jones (talk) 18:15, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean, what is now Urban Junction, that is an old Methodist Hall as far as I know. The church on Georges Avenue was a church of the First Wesleyan church, that I understood to be Methodist. Perhaps they moved to Newtown Avenue. I will find out at some point. --DubhEire (talk) 21:57, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Irish Board of First Fruits

I like the article, and I think it would be a good candidate for the "Did you know..." section on the main page. If you want it to appear there, and in case you don't know how to do it, you can nominate it on Template talk:Did you know.--A bit iffy (talk) 11:52, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am quite interested in this too and I suppose a Did you know what bring more light to the subject of church funding. I saw the board mentioned as part of the funding for new churches in lots of references. I also noticed that many architects worked for the board, but I didn't know what it was or why it gave grants.

I would like to see the article enhanced a bit more and I see an edit you made to show that Jonathan Swift influenced its creation. At this time I am unable to show why or how he influenced the creation, so I left it out for now. You also make reference to another encyclopaedia, which in my understanding, they shouldn't be used as references in Wikipedia.

If you could help with the enhancement that would be great. I would like to get more information about architects and notable buildings that were built or greatly enhanced by the board. I would also like to know who the board members were. It would be good to have more detail about the board rather than just dates and funds. I'm sure over time those things will be learnt.

Also, an interesting edit made by someone added St. Kieran’s Church of Ireland, Cloughjordan, North Tipperary, seems to say the church was built in 1837 which contradicts the 1833 end of the Board. Perhaps the church was built prior to 1837 and was extensively remodelled that. Or perhaps it was one of the last designs and was not completed until 1837. Anyway it raises a point of contradiction.

DubhEire (talk) 12:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrations

Dubh, as our resident Most Excellent Illuminator, would you take a look at a few of my articles such as Leabhar Ua Maine. I've never got the hang of incorporating photos into such articles, and they would really be lifted with illustration. Attached are links providing photographic material. Let me know if you can, Fergananim (talk) 18:00, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's an interesting challenge. I'm afraid to say there are a number of copyright issues to overcome. I will have to look into this further as I have been reading up on those of late and find it a little confusing still. --DubhEire (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On further thought it may just come down to asking one of the libraries if we can use an image or two. This may well be possible. --DubhEire (talk) 18:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ballyfermot College of Further Education

I reverted the edit in question to your edit and left a comment on the editors' talk page. Normally I use WP:TWINKLE to automatically leave messages about articles and edits (though there wasn't one for this situation). If you leave a warning there is a variety of them and there are four levels starting from the most friendly and accomodating (could apply to a new or overenthusiastic editor) to the strictest. The templates are listed at WP:WARN for more detail and usually people apply a level 1 template and apply higher ones if the editor persists apply higher ones. (Usually these apply since the start of the month.) Most level 1 warnings seem to do the trick most of the time and the tone of the different levels seems to be a good guide to manually writing warnings. (Level 1 is friendly, almost apologetic in tone.) Some examples of templates are listed in

Most wikipedia policies are listed at Category:Wikipedia policy and guidelines at WP:GUIDELINES if you need them. You're doing great work!Autarch (talk) 13:58, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. That is very useful. --DubhEire (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Hi, thanks for putting a photo on the St. George's church article - saves me having to make a trip to the northside! I was wondering whether you have any photos of the Mariners' Church in Dun Laoghaire, for an article I've just created for it: Mariners' Church, Dún Laoghaire. I have some interior photos but nothing of the building itself, as it was already dark when I was there. Hohenloh⁺ 22:05, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I don't have any of the outside and the sunnier days I have been in different directions. I will be that way soon though, as with around Cork Street, etc. Did you manage to get around there yet? DubhEire (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My camera is broken - a friend dropped it at a session last week and it's dead as a dodo, so no pix for the moment. You did a fine job on St. Audeon/Audoen - what you say about moving it to St. Audoen's Catholic Church, Dublin (or similar)? Hohenloh⁺ 21:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear about your camera. That is a cost that is not needed in these times. I want to buy a new camera, but a fair bit of saving is required.

Anyway, as you were saying about moving St. Audeon's. I noted that the RC is referred to as St. Audeon's, High Street and the COI is St. Audeon's, Cornmarket. Perhaps we should rename both of these with some thought. I would be happy with St. Audeon's, High Street (Catholic) and perhaps the other as St. Audeon's, Cornmarket (Church of Ireland).

What do you think of the renaming of both for clarity?

I think there is a tool that will do the rename and keep all the history intact. Must look that up.

DubhEire (talk) 21:37, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And just now I have seen the typo that you were pointing out, so for sure it needs to be moved, but perhaps a better name overall as suggested previously. DubhEire (talk) 21:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have attempted translation of the entablature inscription - see my talk page. Also, suggest disambiguation page for the two churches. Laurel Lodged (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at the following link. Might be useful. http://books.google.ie/books?id=YZ0vb5L9PIsC&pg=PA174&lpg=PA174&dq=%22sub+invoc%22+%2Blatin&source=bl&ots=E8F4_yWHkt&sig=-VHM_NsWbR7iDOKaV1h4TJPZN_0&hl=en&ei=kTm7S8q7E8n6_AakveTaBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CA8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q=%22sub%20invoc%22%20%2Blatin&f=false Laurel Lodged (talk) 13:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I can be of help to any eds. re. city centre photos, just drop me a line. Recently purchased camera that really hasn't been taken for a proper spin yet. Novice on the photo front but willing to give it a try! RashersTierney (talk) 20:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What camera did you get? I have my eye out, but I have been very hesitant to buy as I'm unsure. I want to get a good DSLR, but it is not practical for snapping around the place. There are some really excellent compacts out at the moment that do an exceptional job.

As regards city centre photos, roughly where will you be. There are quite a few photos for articles needed around town. It's just a case of finding them. That reminds me, I have a suggestion for the WikiProject Ireland needs a photo category to help with this task. Have you see an editors request for photos of the HQ of Aerlingus and Ryanair?

I would like to do an article on the Unitarian church at Stephen's Green. It would be good to get a nice photo of outside on a nice day and also the inside if possible. Also, the church that is connected to Trinity beside the Dept of Justice. Then there is the Shelbourne hotel where there are no inside pictures. The Dawson street article reuses the Mansion house picture, perhaps a picture that illustrates Dawson street better. Also, some better pictures of the Mansion House showing its architecture would be good. Actually if you do a search for Dawson street you will see there are a few articles related that have no pic. Hodges and Figgis has no pic, but the outlet on Dawson Street would be notable.

For your own practice you could just shoot off a couple of hundred in around Trinity college. You are bound to get a few good ones there. There are many Trinity articles about the different schools / departments. Go check them out. Taking these kind of pictures will improve your skills as you will get the chance to photograph them again and again and look at your photos on your PC with your critical eye. Then you will see mistakes / improvements you can make and revisit. A great way to learn in my opinion. You may even notice striking differences between the seasons.

Best of luck DubhEire (talk) 13:49, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Funny you should mention the Unitarian Church. I was there on Good Friday for the commemoration and was sorry not to have arrived a little earlier to take snaps of those glorious stained glass windows. However, by the time I got there it would have been a bit intrusive. Camera is a Canon G9, which I got at a knock-down price because it is no longer the 'latest and greatest', but is more than adequate for my modest requirements. I'll note the suggestions above and do my best. RashersTierney (talk) 14:13, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That looks like a nice camera. It also takes pictures in RAW format. You should look up about that format and how to use it. I am only learning about that myself.

Feel free to create an article about the Unitarian church if you want. You are right about feeling a bit funny taking pictures, but on the other hand, just go for it. I have a few funny stories, but sure it's all part of it. Anyway, you are now a documenter of Dublin and Irish life. You are only doing a good thing. DubhEire (talk) 14:21, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A little token...

Exceptional Newcomer Award

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		Keep up the exceptional editing standards, particularly your new article contribs. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 20:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well thank you very much for the encouragement. DubhEire (talk) 23:19, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fáilte romhat. (You're welcome). RashersTierney (talk) 23:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blackrock

I saw your request for assessment, but don't really know enough about the process, but I did do a copy-edit for the first half and will continue later (mainly spelling and grammar). There's a bit of duplication in the section about Blackrock park that could be tightened up (IMHO). Hohenloh⁺ 13:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking through your edits and Blackrock and great. Nice cleanup. I also note what you say about Blackrock Park and I will try to get to that soon. I have other details that I will add shortly, but I like to throw these around in mind for a bit. DubhEire (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BlackRock

Footnotes are really needed whenever you're citing a book. You're saying material is from this book, which is fair enough, but it doesn't tell the reader what information is from the book, and which of the (I assume) hundreds of pages that information is found on. Ironholds (talk) 14:13, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Audoen's

Following your suggestion, I'll go ahead and re-name it to St. Audoen's Church, Cornmarket, Dublin. The intro needs to be expanded, considering the present length of the article, mentioning that it's a CoI church. Need some info on the dimensions, etc., for the Infobox - otherwise I'll have to go up there with a measuring-tape! Hohenloh⁺ 18:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok and I suppose the other St. Audoen's should be High Street. I can email you a scan of the pages from a book that I have here about the church on Cornmarket, if that's any use. It's called "Dublin Churches" by Peter Costello. DubhEire (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I have access to that book (I know Peter well). Do you by any chance have a photo of the Sick and Indigent Roomkeepers' Society building? I'm going to create an article on it now. I have a photo somewhere, but it would mean going through all my old photos, a bit time-consuming! Hohenloh⁺ 14:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't. I will put on my mental list and next time I am cycling nearby and the weather is nice, I will take a snap. It could be sooner that you think.

That's interesting you know Peter. I may have a question about a detail in the book. Actually, do you have any other book names that you would recommend for churches in Dublin? DubhEire (talk) 14:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fire Brigade Photos

Hi, thanks for the message. I plan to spend a day shooting such photos in the near future. I have access to the O'Brien Institute through the Civil Defence and will endeavour to get some shots of the lads training for the article as it deserves more attention. Also thanks for the idea on the user page, is well overdue alright! All the best. Heggyhomolit (talk) 01:23, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome and best of luck. Where did you get all those infoboxes so quick. I will have to borrow one or two of those. DubhEire (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to kill a few hours making most of them with the template, few ideas in my head so threw them up, feel free to borrow away! Heggyhomolit (talk) 01:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your help please

I admire your work first of all! I should be grateful, if you could find the time to include the Irish Stock Exchange (28 Anglesea Street)and the Law Society of Ireland (Blackhall Place, Dublin 7) in your nice style of Dublin photographs.

I have been known been known to award Barnstars, but only to those to make genuine contributions to Wikipedia, which you certainly have for a new contributor.

Best wishes,

Skreen (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot and barnstar or none, it's no problem. I should be near there this week. Is there anything in particular I should pay attention to?

I also note that there are no geo coords for the Irish Stock Exchange article. Should there be? I may have this wrong, but the building on 28 Anglesea Street is no longer used (historical significant of course), but the stock exchange is somewhere else now?

The Law Society of Ireland is no problem either, and again no geo coords, should there be? I can tag them if you want and concur that the articles are located where these buildings are.

DubhEire (talk) 12:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Completed for now. The trees really do obscure the Law Society. I also got the Bar Society building. DubhEire (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your Photos are the best in Ireland

		The Irish Barnstar of National Merit
		For non stop excellent hard work, please accept The Irish Barnstar of National Merit Skreen (talk) 19:50, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RCB library

Just thought I'd mention that I'm going to the Representative Church Body library next week, in case you'd like anything looked up. I'm doing some family research there. Hohenloh⁺ 02:14, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the offer, but I can't think of anything. There is the architect John Bowden who I would love to know when he was born and died. He is believed to have died around 1821-2. If that information is possible to find there, but I woulnd't like to destract you too much from your main focus. Thanks again. DubhEire (talk) 11:57, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, would you be so kind as to give us support!

Hello, thanks for the cookies I wish I could have tasted some but well... I hope you're doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I've just read your profile and I saw that you're proud to be Irish (I wish I can visit your wonderful country some time soon!), so you understand what are a minorized language and culture and maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... I'm a member of a Catalan association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this hasn't been approved up to that moment. We would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: Wikimedia CAT. Supporting us will be like giving equal opportunity to minorized languages and cultures in the future! Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Keep on preserving your great culture, country, music and language! Slán agat! Capsot (talk) 07:26, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nearly Back

Just in case anyone was wondering, I have been elsewhere for , but I am close to returning for a bit. When the weather turns really bad and work eases up, I'll be back. DubhEire (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! Welcome (nearly) back! RashersTierney (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

St. Catherine's, Meath Street

Sad to hear of St. Catherine's of Meath Street having the alter destroyed. I was meant to create a Wikipedia page for the church. I have some photos from all that time ago. Must create it now. DubhEire (talk)

Sad indeed to hear the news, but good to see you back in the saddle. Thought we may have 'lost' you. Best. RashersTierney (talk) 20:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't plan on it being this long. I will just have to try harder. I suppose a New Year's resolution. Anyway, I made this St. Catherine's, Meath Street. Very basic and I know I have more details somewhere. Just need to find them. It's been awhile. DubhEire (talk)

Oh. and thank you for the welcome back. Both this time and last time. DubhEire (talk)

A lot of my family were baptized there. Welcome back and happy new year! Hohenloh⁺ 12:12, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year to you too. Now that I am back, I'll have to stay back. DubhEire (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cosgrave Property Group

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cosgrave Property Group requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Toddst1 (talk) 21:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a major property company in Ireland of national significance. DubhEire (talk) 21:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DubhEire. You have new messages at AFBorchert's talk page.
Message added 18:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposal to shut down WP Geographic Coordinates & ban coordinates on wikipedia articles

This means you. --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Haven't seen you around for a while. Hope all is well. RashersTierney (talk) 11:12, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Belated hello and thanks. I'm back again (again) and going to the old reliable editing for me of geographical locations, pictures and local history. For example, where to do more like the river Liffey geo route map. I wonder if those guys over on the geo project tweaked a few things yet to give a more enriching experience. DubhEire (talk) 11:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Basso bikes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Basso bikes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Focus bikes logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Focus bikes logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]