User talk:Biker Biker
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. Biker Biker has not edited Wikipedia since June 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
| This is Biker Biker's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
TUSC token 647d25d87e0c5f94f00c4735d89f90d1
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! --Biker Biker (talk) 21:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Barnstar of Diligence |
| For outstanding patience with a user who was hellbent on that Samsung article. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ Talk ♪ ߷ ♀ Contribs ♀ 09:46, 6 April 2013 (UTC) |
- Thanks. Luckily the numpties rarely win on Wikipedia. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:02, 7 April 2013 (UTC)
Apologies for my mistake in changing the currencies ... I am a real newbie with the editting rules
[edit]I will do more research before I make any similar changes.
Thank you for you patience with this.
Alkivi (talk) 22:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Also apologies for changing the Telecommunications ...
[edit]I looked at many telecom operators and most of them were coded Telecommunications.
Since the pointers resolve to the same Industry definition, I now realize there is no reason to make these changes.
Once again, thanks for your patience with me.
Alkivi (talk) 22:13, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- No problem. We are here to help you learn. We want you to become a better editor. As I posted on your page, take a look at the manual of style. Start with WP:MOS. The currency stuff is part of the number manual of style WP:MOSNUM. If you have any questions, just ask. --Biker Biker (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
F800GS is a motorcycle. F80GS is not.
[edit]F800GS is a motorcycle. F80GS is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.77.43.246 (talk) 08:40, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't doubt it (I own a F800GS) but Ted Simon rode a R80GS (which I also own). --Biker Biker (talk) 08:49, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Changes in Motorscooter article
[edit]Hi Biker Biker,
my addition to motor scooter article was copied from one of my article (SYM DD50). Please let me know if you disagree with the following analysis.
" Until mid-1990s, scooters generally referred to classic Vespa styled scooter with 4 speed manual-transmission, a relatively powerful 2 stroke engine, and foot operated rear brake. From mid 1990s, the concept of ‘twist and go’ – referring to CVT transmission (with no clutch or transmission) scooter began to gain popularity. As cities got congested, using a small scooter to commute within city got popular with people who are otherwise not interested in motorcycling thus the complexities that come with a manual transmission. Since then, the popularity of twist and go scooters increased. Now (2013) manual scooters like Vespa T5 are referred to as ‘classic scooters’ and very few manufactures exist. For example, Piaggio currently makes only one model of manual transmission scooter, which is Vespa PX150. Back in 1980s, almost all the scooters from Piaggio were manual transmission with left hand operated clutch-twist gear. Currently, ‘Scooter’ almost universally refers to a small motor scooter with a 50cc to 250cc engine, twist-and-go transmission, 2 or 4 stroke engine, ease of operation, and lesser license/registration requirements than motorcycles. While maxi-scooters can range from 250cc to exotic 850cc engine displacement range, they represent a minute fraction of total scooters in use around the world."
Thanks,
Samihasib
samihasib@yahoo.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samihasib (talk • contribs) 14:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- See WP:OR, because that's what your personal analysis is - original research. Where are the citations to support your assertions that, for example, 250 to 850cc bikes represent a tiny fraction of scooters. What about all the other claims? Who are the people referring to classic style scooters? Bottom line, this is not encyclopaedic. --Biker Biker (talk) 14:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Stella article
[edit]You reverted an entire section on the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stella_%28scooter%29 full of useful information on differences between the Stella and its P-Series sibling, something that comes up incessantly all over the internet for people looking for information on these bikes, just because you have a quibble over a reliable source? Thanks for reminding me why I don't contribute to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.96.77.50 (talk) 06:22, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- See WP:OR. --Biker Biker (talk) 07:32, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
SPI
[edit]I am proposing leaving all your accounts unblocked, on the condition that you disclose all your accounts on all the userpages. This is largely because in the past you have used multiple accounts inappropriately, as mentioned at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biker Biker. Is this a condition that you can accept? --Rschen7754 04:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Alternate accounts blocked
[edit]I have blocked your alternate accounts, Simple Bob (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) and Bob Re-born (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), due to your lack of response at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biker Biker. They can be unblocked as soon as you agree to disclose the connection on each of your three userpages. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
REBELS, MC , Red Deer, Alta.
[edit]The Rebels MC in Red Deer , Alta was not disbanded within the first year they were together like it said in the Wikipedia article. They were together from late 1967 to about late 1971 to early 1972 and during that time a fellow named Walter 245@@@@ came down from Edmonton to party with the Red Deer chapter and asked to open a charter membership in Edmonton and eventually he was allowed to open the Edmonton chapter. The reason I know this to be FACT is because I AM one of the founding members of the original REBELS MC in Red Deer, Alta. back in the late 60's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.66.225.10 (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- If you were a member, when did you leave the club? Where was the clubhouse? What bar did the Red Deer chapter mostly hang out at? If what you claim is true, can you provide a source (a book, a newspaper article, something...) that will support your claim? Unfortunately original research is not an acceptable source. I will try to help so we can improve the accuracy of these types of articles where few written references exist. If you have copies of any memorabilia that would support your claim (i.e. minutes from meetings, a photograph of a Red Deer patch that can be dated to later than 1969 ... anything ... you could email it to me at garth_of_the_forest@yahoo.com; until then unfortunately we have no choice but to revert your changes. I don't doubt what you say, we just need to be able to support any changes to articles with sources that are acceptable to Wikipedia. I would also be curious to hear of any other inaccuracies you may have found when you read Coyote's book (I assume you must have read it if you were a founding member of the Rebels). Can you share any other details of how/why the Red Deer chapter folded? It was a few years before my time... Garth of the Forest (talk) 01:30, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Re: Mobile Device Management & SOTI Pages
[edit]Hi Biker Biker, I apologize for the inappropriate external link to SOTI's website on the Mobile Device Management (MDM) Wiki page- I was hoping to include SOTI in the listing of major vendors.
Would it be acceptable to add SOTI to the list without linking to their external site?
I am currently trying to revive their company Wiki page, which I would ideally like to link to. Perhaps you could assist me with this as well, as it has proven quite challenging.
Please let me know- thanks in advance, I appreciate your help!
Best, Michael Msalmassian (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Hey Biker Biker
I'm sending you this because you've made quite a few edits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).
So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.
What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.
The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.
Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:51, 4 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
| Views/Day | Quality | Title | Content | Headings | Images | Links | Sources | Tagged with… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 530 | 
|
Landline (talk) | 
|
|
|
Add sources | ||
| 182 |
|
Quanta Computer (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Add sources | |
| 3,133 | 
|
3G (talk) |
|
|
Add sources | |||
| 811 |
|
Communications in India (talk) | Add sources | |||||
| 42 |
|
Neuf Cegetel (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Add sources | |
| 66 |
|
3G adoption (talk) |
|
|
|
Add sources | ||
| 4,316 |
|
4G (talk) |
|
Cleanup | ||||
| 79 |
|
Montesa Honda (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Cleanup | |
| 4,810 | 
|
Psy (talk) | Cleanup | |||||
| 150 |
|
CACI (talk) |
|
|
Expand | |||
| 1,438 |
|
Linux Mint (talk) | Expand | |||||
| 1,158 |
|
Akbaruddin Owaisi (talk) |
|
Expand | ||||
| 56 |
|
O2 (Ireland) (talk) |
|
|
Unencyclopaedic | |||
| 1,225 |
|
MediaTek (talk) |
|
|
Unencyclopaedic | |||
| 127 |
|
Subaru Legacy (first generation) (talk) |
|
Unencyclopaedic | ||||
| 123 |
|
Hitachi Data Systems (talk) |
|
|
Merge | |||
| 1,012 |
|
Ford Super Duty (talk) |
|
Merge | ||||
| 92 |
|
Perspective control lens (talk) |
|
|
|
Merge | ||
| 569 |
|
Orange (telecommunications) (talk) | Wikify | |||||
| 339 |
|
Motorola Solutions (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Wikify | |
| 3 |
|
Sunshine Coast Rugby Union (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Wikify |
| 3 |
|
M-tel (Bosnia and Herzegovina) (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Orphan |
| 10 |
|
Phone Power (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Orphan | |
| 5 |
|
Thomas Hayo (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Orphan |
| 414 |
|
SummerSlam 2013 (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 395 |
|
Nokia Lumia 720 (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Stub | |
| 78 |
|
Kabanos (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 103 |
|
Wistron Corporation (talk) |
|
|
|
|
Stub | |
| 5 |
|
Southern Cross Telco (talk) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stub |
| 106 |
|
WIND (Italy) (talk) |
|
|
|
Stub |
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Nice works on bikes!! BenisonPBaby 14:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC) |
Removing Claire Leavey & Dave Minton from CBG entry
[edit]Hi! I am Claire Leavey, and I've reverted your removal of mine and Dave Minton's names from the Classic Bike Guide entry. Look at any issue of CBG from around 1992 to 1996 and you will see both our names on the masthead as regular contributors. I became editor 1993. Prior to that, Rebekkah Smith co-edited British Bike with Tim Holmes, but she was not sole editor - hence I was the first. Shortly after me, Karen Tait became editor of Back Street Heroes. She was the second. I also edited the UK title Motorcycle Classics (there is a current, unrelated US mag with that title), but it was a short-lived magazine and so has no Wiki entry. I hope that clears matters up for you. Please don't revert my edits again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RetroMetroCo (talk • contribs) 11:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
[edit]We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:30, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that, but I have no idea what I did wrong!
[edit]I found a message today " Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Feet forwards motorcycle, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Biker Biker (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)"
Obviously I have no recollection of what change I may have made in February, nor was I aware that there are two classes of Wikipedia pages, those that you're actively encouraged to contribute to and correct, and others where you shouldn't. Be assured that I'm happy to erase all comments that I may have made, and all text that I may have added. Just tell me how I find it???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.47.191 (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Sorry about that, but I have no idea what I did wrong!
[edit]− − I found a message today
− " Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:Feet forwards motorcycle, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
− Thank you.
− Biker Biker (talk) 19:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)"
− − Obviously I have no recollection of what change I may have made in February, nor was I aware that there are two classes of Wikipedia pages, those that you're actively encouraged to contribute to and correct, and others where you shouldn't.
− Be assured that I'm happy to erase all comments that I may have made, and all text that I may have added. Just tell me how I find it???? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.159.47.191 (talk) 15:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
A Tesla Roadster for you!
[edit]
|
A Tesla Roadster for you! |
| Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! Gg53000 (talk) 14:20, 7 January 2014 (UTC) |
Converting Types of Motorcycles to list
[edit]I see you have contributed, or sought to contribute, to the page on types of motorcycles. We are currently considering reducing that page to a list. The list would link to separate pages exploring each type in depth. An example of how it would look is in my sandbox. See the talk page for Types of Motorcyclesfor further discussion. Do you have an opinion, pro or con?ElijahBosley (talk ☞) 13:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Changes I have made to an article, Pikes Peak International Hill Climb, but you didn't provide a reliable source.
[edit]Hi!
I accept the fact you removed my change, becouse I did not post a sorce qoute. But, since I do not remeber the change I made to an article. I would kindly ask, you to tel me, what did I post. I would gladly try to elaborate my doings.
Best regards!
31.15.215.208 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Phantom_Lord 9/2/2014
Changes I have made to an article, Pikes Peak International Hill Climb, but you didn't provide a reliable source.
[edit]Hi!
I accept the fact you removed my change, becouse I did not post a sorce qoute. But, since I do not remeber the change I made to an article. I would kindly ask, you to tel me, what did I post. I would gladly try to elaborate my doings.
Best regards!
31.15.215.208 (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2014 (UTC)Phantom_Lord 9/2/2014
K1200GT edit
[edit]I was reviewing the K1200GT webpage and saw that you had undone edit 437627900 which corrected the horsepower and torque of the K1300GT. That edit was actually correct. I own a K1300GT, and I have three separate articles (directly from BMW) that indicate the correct horsepower is 160 bhp (118 kW) and 99 lb•ft (135 N•m) What appears to have happened is that the original citation for the increased horsepower and torque was for the K1300S, released at the same time by BMW. They do not share similar power stats.
I would correct the page myself, but the syntax on this editing language is way beyond me.
Thanks! Craig Cvorwald (talk) 22:33, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Biker Biker is away for a while, but I've updated the page with the rear wheel hp from Motorcycle Consumer News tests for 2003 and 2006. If you want to discuss further, please use Talk:BMW K1200GT. Thanks! --Dennis Bratland (talk) 23:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Stella (scooter)
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stella (scooter), has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Brianhe (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, BMW K75, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 02:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
Halloween cheer!
[edit]
Hello Biker Biker:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
– The Herald 12:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Seasonal Greets!
[edit]
|
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2015 !!! |
|
Hello Biker Biker, May you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New year 2015. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
Valentine Greets!!!
[edit]
|
Valentine Greets!!! |
|
Hello Biker Biker, love is the language of hearts and is the feeling that joins two souls and brings two hearts together in a bond. Taking love to the level of Wikipedia, spread the WikiLove by wishing each other Happy Valentine's Day, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Valentine Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Talk back
[edit]Message added 05:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You may be interested . . .
[edit]. . . in this re. the block evasion by our old friend at Chevrolet Vega :) — Writegeist (talk) 17:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) @Writegeist: Biker Biker has been inactive for over two years.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 18:50, 23 June 2015 (UTC)
Motorcycle and scooter lane filtering
[edit]I noted that you edited out some of my refereed publications on this issue. There are now agent based fully validated models as well(“The kinematical features of motorcycles in congested urban networks”. Tzu-Chang, L., Polak, J., Bell, M. G. H., & Wigan, M. R. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 49, 203-211. etc etc). I am puzzled why you edited them out, I only put them on Wikipedia because I was asked to by some of those who use my professional publications in these and other areas who do not have access to university libraries! . Perhaps you could clarify? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mwigan (talk • contribs) 06:12, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Blake Fitzpatrick
[edit]Hi! I thought you would like to know that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blake_Fitzpatrick was deleted and is currently under deletion review after an arguably unreliable second Afd. Filmfan655321 (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Honda VTR1000F
[edit]Hi, I have recently made some efforts to improve the Honda VTR1000F page, but most of my edits were swiftly reverted by editor 72bikers. I feel the VTR page needs to progress, but, having made some contributions, I would prefer other biker Wikipedians to have their input. If you have a moment, why not have a look at the page and see what you think? (I’m sending this message to: Dennis Bratland, Biker Biker, Brianhe and Rocknrollmancer). Cheers, Arrivisto
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar |
| "Tireless" (joke about automobiles)
You seem to have done much more than I could. Wow! I mean, you're an epic contributor! The Meow Doge (talk) 05:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC) |
Merger discussion for Kawasaki motorcycles
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing—Kawasaki motorcycles—has been proposed for merging with Kawasaki Heavy Industries Motorcycle & Engine. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 21:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Akrapovic logo.gif
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Akrapovic logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Greetings, You can upload the File "RBLR logo.png" file to Wikimedia Commons? Neriah • talk • 16:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page stalker) No, Neriah, not possible. The logo is only available to use in Wikipedia, and must be used in an article (The Royal British Legion Riders Branch). This logo does not have free use. Wikimedia Commons is only for media that can be freely used, without restrictions, by anyone.
Biker Biker has not edited Wikipedia since 2013, so I am replying here. Thank you.--Rocknrollmancer (talk) 22:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)