User talk:Nik50382

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Australian Psychological Society. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 23:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. — Manti core 14:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

APS

Wikipedia is not a means of promoting the APS, nor the ACPA; with whom I have no affiliation, I might add. The information you are continually removing is not my personal opinion, has been appropriate sourced, and you will be blocked if you continue to remove it. — Manti core 12:10, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — Manti core 10:59, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've copied over the first part of this conversation to Talk:Australian Psychological Society#Recent edits. Please continue this discussion there. Thanks! — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:44, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Psychological Society

Consider this a formal warning: do not add text to articles that you've copied and pasted from other sources. Doing so violates Wiki policy on copyrights and will get you banned. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:50, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Your addition to Australian Psychological Society has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Australian Psychological Society. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 13:57, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Australian Psychological Society, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:50, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect to your sincere attempts to improve wikipedia, I am obliged to (temporarily) block you account from editing because of repeated copy/pasting of copyrighted text. Please do not continue with such behavior after the block expires, as it will inevitably result in a longer block, purely for technical reasons.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nik50382 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for copyright violation however the material was sourced form a public website and acknowledged as per copyright guidelines

Decline reason:

Just because you acknowledge where you got it from, does not give you the right to copy the text verbatim. That is still a copyright violation. Q ^{T C} 05:36, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SPI

I've opened a sockpuppet investigation regarding your and Superstitious123's edits. You can view it at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nik50382. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 01:19, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked for abusing multiple accounts. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nik50382. To contest this block please place {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Tiptoety ^talk 00:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]