User talk:Navaneethmadhusoodanan

Welcome!

Hello, Navaneethmadhusoodanan, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Filmelon, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Filmelon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Filmelon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:38, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —George8211 / T 18:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:CPC Cine Awards has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CPC Cine Awards. Thanks! MassiveYR ♠ 16:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CPC Cine Awards (April 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see comment on inline (footnotes) referencing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CPC Cine Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Navaneethmadhusoodanan, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:45, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CPC Cine Awards (August 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kvng was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at CPC Cine Awards instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CPC Cine Awards and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Kvng (talk) 22:16, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CPC Cine Awards concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CPC Cine Awards, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CPC Cine Awards

Hello, Navaneethmadhusoodanan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CPC Cine Awards".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cinema Paradiso Club moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cinema Paradiso Club, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 17:56, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gowry Lekshmi has been accepted

Gowry Lekshmi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

TeriEmbrey (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

B.Thyagarajan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, B.Thyagarajan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:27, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cinema Paradiso Club

Hello, Navaneethmadhusoodanan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cinema Paradiso Club".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 11:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gowry Lekshmi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gowry Lekshmi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gowry Lekshmi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 08:30, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jai Vishnu moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jai Vishnu. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:58, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jai Vishnu (February 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jai Vishnu and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

User4edits (talk) 15:47, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Vedan (rapper) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Vedan (rapper). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Not ready for mainspace.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Macbeejack ☎ 12:57, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please give feedback on issues with given citations. Multiple links from credible sources (major medias in India) have been presented already. Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 15:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anend C Chandran moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Anend C Chandran. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Navaneethmadhusoodanan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Anend C Chandran, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira, the reason to create the content was the notability of the topic. No intentional bias was made during the creation. Additionally, more care was taken not to create a stub, based on feedback on previous contributions. Looking forward for help in refining content where ever necessary Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first step is to disclose the COI with Anend C Chandran and on subjects you have edited previously on your user page. Once you have done that, you can submit the draft for review using the submit button at the top of the draft. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:13, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. But when I as an editor, if not connected to the subject as per wiki norms, should i still go ahead with this step of disclosing COI ? Looking forward for input Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 06:20, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How did you get the subject's image if you are not connected to the subject? Does the subject know that you have created an article about them? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:17, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I contribute to Wikipedia majorly on contents related to Malayalam Film Industry. I do not personally know the subject. The subject is a notable figure in the Malayalam Film Industry and recently multiple movie projects where in the subject is involved have been announced. Finding that the subject does not have a wiki page, is the reason to create one.

Regarding the photo used, I have obtained it from a movie discussion group outside Wikipedia with permission, as in my previous articles, when I uploaded images from internet, it was removed stating copyright issues. Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 09:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May I ask who gave you the image and the permission to use it? You have removed this from the article. Please also explain how you initially got that information. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the photo, I have had the permission from the author of the discussion thread, stated above. Regarding the other information viz birthday and short film details, it is available on the subject's Facebook, Linked In, IMDb pages and also YouTube. I have removed from this article as Facebook and LinkedIn, YouTube links are not assumed to be valid citations. Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 04:35, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the author has given you permission to use the image, you first need to credit the photographer in the author field and describe how you got the image in the source field, including the date the image was taken not when you received it. Then you need to disclose your COI and submit the article for review. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 04:59, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update. In that case, I would request help to remove the image from the article as unsure if the information like date the photo was taken will be available.

Again, with declaring the COI, shall I go ahead even though I'm not connected to the subject? Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 13:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have stated above that you got permission. Then how are you not connected to the subject? AFAIK, almost all the time, you can only obtain a raw image from the photographer or the subject themselves. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 14:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my above statement, I have stated that I got the photograph of the subject from a movie discussion group that I’m part of. The permission to use the photograph was from the author of that discussion and not the subject. I’m unsure if that person itself is the photographer or the owner of the rights or is connected to the subject. That is the reason to request the remove the photograph. The subject does have notability and so is the reason for article creation and not any personal connection with the subject. Hence the query if I should still be declaring COI Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 15:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have resubmitted the article for review and also have declared COI on my user page. Navaneethmadhusoodanan (talk) 11:54, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anend C Chandran (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We just don't need passing mentions, we need sources that meets WP:42.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anend C Chandran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 07:32, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]