User talk:Macbeejack
Macbeejack, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Macbeejack! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC) |
The article Samar Singh Dungarpur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Couldn't find any evidence of notability for "Samar Singh Dungarpur".
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Samar Singh Dungarpur for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samar Singh Dungarpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
// Timothy :: talk 06:18, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
The article Deepak Singh (film producer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Allendrew (talk) 10:33, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Macbeejack. Thank you for your work on Ambuja (2023 film). User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Please add some reviews.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|DreamRimmer}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜 13:27, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Macbeejack, and welcome to Women in Red. I see your main interest is in Indian films. If you want to write articles about actresses or other women, you'll find some useful guidance in our Ten Simple Rules. You might also like to sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest in the project. Please let me know if you run into any problems or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit]
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Ipigott (talk) 07:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Ipigott, Thank You for warm welcome. Macbeejack (talk) 09:34, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red December 2023
[edit]
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Regarding the COI tag on the article. Sandesh Lamsal
[edit]Hello user:Macbeejack, Greetings from Nepal. Just noticed that you have added COI tag on the article Sandesh Lamsal. I too thought about the COI and neutrality issues on that article, but after checking it, I found that other independent volunteers have re-written the article with the neutral point of view. So, can you please check the article once and consider about removing the tags you put there or suggest me your points which are needed to be improved there? I think I can contribute more if anything dissatisfies your point of view. Thanks WikiEditorNepali (talk) 16:16, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hi WikiEditorNepali, The user SandeshLamsalNepal created the article itself, which makes it obvious that there is a conflict of interest. Additionally, I saw that a particular IP address attempted to remove the Notability tag without offering comprehensive coverage of the topic. But i am thankful to Melcous, who added the tag again. Therefore, I don't believe that anonymous users are making any helpful edits at this time. Macbeejack ☎ 06:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- I totally agree with you. I thought to moderate the issue and remove only the conflict of interest and pov, tags after seeing user:Melcous's edit, who did an excellent work by revising the article and I think she is an independent volunteer with No COI with the topic. I Think we can trust the edits of User:Melcous. Similarly, the point of notability isn't much digestible for me too. Let's not touch the notability tag, while we can see that the article contains the Neutral pov and no COI after user:Melcous's edits. So, I think we can agree to this point and remove these two of the tags only. WikiEditorNepali (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is fine that you tried but the project is much more organised than you thought. Everyone's story is public and they tell a lot. You, for example, are obviously SandeshLamsalNepal. You are allowed to change accounts provided (a) you don't go back to your old account (if you do, you need to use one of them to only edit articles that the other one does not edit) and (b) don't try to mislead others into thinking the two accounts are different persons. As long as you try to circumvent the system and mislead editors instead of complying with WP:COI, tags are warranted to warn readers and editors about potential issues arising from allowing people to toot their own horn on Wikipedia. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @WikiEditorNepali. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Hello user:usedtobecool
- Well, in Wikipedia it's not necessary, somebody's assumptions to be 100% true and I choose to stand with my opinion. Thank you for your explanation and time. I will not to waste my time and energy in the pointless argument, rather contribute to other important articles. Cheers WikiEditorNepali (talk) 06:50, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- Pinging @WikiEditorNepali. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:09, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- It is fine that you tried but the project is much more organised than you thought. Everyone's story is public and they tell a lot. You, for example, are obviously SandeshLamsalNepal. You are allowed to change accounts provided (a) you don't go back to your old account (if you do, you need to use one of them to only edit articles that the other one does not edit) and (b) don't try to mislead others into thinking the two accounts are different persons. As long as you try to circumvent the system and mislead editors instead of complying with WP:COI, tags are warranted to warn readers and editors about potential issues arising from allowing people to toot their own horn on Wikipedia. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:08, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thank You Usedtobecool. Macbeejack ☎ 13:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- I totally agree with you. I thought to moderate the issue and remove only the conflict of interest and pov, tags after seeing user:Melcous's edit, who did an excellent work by revising the article and I think she is an independent volunteer with No COI with the topic. I Think we can trust the edits of User:Melcous. Similarly, the point of notability isn't much digestible for me too. Let's not touch the notability tag, while we can see that the article contains the Neutral pov and no COI after user:Melcous's edits. So, I think we can agree to this point and remove these two of the tags only. WikiEditorNepali (talk) 09:20, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit] 
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2024 (UTC)