User talk:MrSchimpf/Archive/Archive 21

Archive 15

←

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

→

Archive 25

WMGM-TV / Univision Sale

Hi, I saw your comment on the TVNewsCheck website about the purchase of WMGM-TV by Univision, so I want your advice about something... Current on the List of Univision affiliates (table) and List of Univision affiliates (by U.S. state) it shows no affiliates in the Philadelphia market, would it be inappropriate to list WMGM-TV under New Jersey since that's where its technically licensed and Philadelphia under Pennsylvania since that's the market it serves with a notation that the station will be a Univision pending the completion of the sale or should I just wait until the sale is complete. Thanks. YborCityJohn (talk) 01:10, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boys (TV series)

Thanks for the fuller analysis on this one. I got rid of the worst of it and I was suspicious about much of the remainder. Meters (talk) 22:57, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Packers

Hey, I saw that you are listed as an active member of the Packers Wikiproject. I am interested in trying to push the Green Bay Packers main article to good article status. If you are interested, I would appreciate any help or advice that you are willing to give. I am sending this to all active members, so please reply to this proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Green Bay Packers. Thanks! And go pack go ‡ Єl Cid, Єl Caɱ̩peador ^ᐐT₳LKᐬ 16:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Katz Broadcasting

Your edit summary of "it wouldn't hurt to read a reference once in awhile; they aren't being moved" was uncalled for. You technically did not source the sentence placing on the wrong side of the ref/cite. The onus is on you to cite it, although I intended to fix it. I was editing three pages at the time, Katz, EW Scripps Co. (where a Katz move is less relevant) and Bounce TV. I probably assume I move it thus felt I did not have to double check the move (or check as if it was the Scripps article). Check out my edit on the Bounce TV article as it does include continue being HQ in same place. Spshu (talk) 12:31, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Merge Sprout → Universal Kids

Hello, I saw your response on my merge proposal about merging Sprout (block) into Universal Kids. I want to try to do so myself, but I do not want to mess anything up, so if you are interested in helping, please let me know. Thank you. JE98 (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Modernponderer (talk) 19:56, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Good call

(cur | prev) 17:15, 25 September 2017‎ Mrschimpf (talk | contribs)‎ . . (38 bytes) (+38)‎ . . (Mrschimpf moved page Centric to BET Her: New branding) (thank)

Justified move, well spotted. However an IP from Berlin has been in there after you and created a dab page, hence lots of links to Centric (TV channel) are now hitting the dab. That in itself isn't a big issue as that is what should happen and the dab page monitor will pick up those broken links. Just letting you know however in case you wish to help fixing the "what links here" now hitting the dab page. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 10:33, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

WNAC-DT2

So, I've been looking all around for a source to cite regarding claims that WNAC-DT2 (The CW Providence) is, in fact, being broadcast at a Video Resolution of 1080i. This link here seems to be reporting that the Video Resolution of this DT2 Sub-Channel is only 720p. So, I'm not judging you or questioning the accuracy of the information you're providing at all but, rather, I'm just curious where you're sourcing the 1080i Video Resolution of WNAC-DT2 (The CW Providence) and if you can, please cite the source that is reporting the Video Resolution to be 1080i. I'd love to see it. Rabbit-Ears.info does, in fact, sometimes end up providing false information, yet it's the only website I know of for checking the Video Resolution, Aspect Ratio, or PSIP Short Name for local broadcast TV Stations. 169.244.115.194 (talk) 22:35, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Viacom carriage dispute

Can I at least put the carriage dispute at Spectrum's Wikipedia page? Thanks, CriticismEdits

Nick Jr.

Tumblr sources can be accurate too. Why do you think Tumbr is not accurate? CriticismEdits — Preceding unsigned comment added by CriticismEdits (talk • contribs) 03:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Mrschimpf:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Nick & More

I don't understand how Nick & More became an unreliable source. How did that happen? CriticismEdits (talk) 08:25, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Apologies

Hey there, CheChe here. I just came to say sorry for reverting you earlier. For some reason I didn't see that your edit was in a comment. All the best, ♫CheChe♫ talk 09:16, 1 November 2017 (UTC).

Need help

I'm dealing with a troll right now by the name of MyGodNo. Can you please give him a taste of his own medicine. MechMaster Katzenstein (talk) 04:03, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

My bad

My apologies for being quick to rush to judgment about the KidsClick article; I didn't quite read it carefully. Thanks for clearing up the confusion for me about why the Seattle entry was removed; I didn't realize it carried it automatically via their ThisTV station. Johnnysama (talk) 03:44, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for fixing the discussions in the AFD, I'm not really sure how or even why it became so mishmashed but anyway thanks for your help :), –Davey2010^Talk 00:28, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

New York City TV Template

Hey Mr. Schimpf, I was trying to organize the NYC tv template and thought that might be a better way to do it. Although my latest revision probably too up too much room. The problem with the template the way it is that its too cluttered and difficult to read. I'd actually prefer to remove the subchannel listings and just list the affiliate of the main channels, rather than have one thousands links in the navbox. If the users want to know about subchannels, they can just click on the individual article. What do you think?--Rusf10 (talk) 03:45, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

XETV-TDT

Hey there. I just wanted to send you a courtesy note to let you know I undid your reversion of my vandalism revert with some tweaks to improve the sentence. I find that the original "former Fox affiliate" wording was confusing the whole issue between the network being a former working network, and CW formerly being FOX on that station. I hope you approve of my improvements. Thanks. Huggums537 (talk)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<font face="Myriad Web">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:royalblue4">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:#B8860B">chatter</span>]])''</small></font> → Nate • (chatter)

to

<span style="font-family: Myriad Web;">'''[[User:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:royalblue4">Nate</span>]]''' <span style="color:#00008B">•</span> <small>''([[User_talk:Mrschimpf|<span style="color:#B8860B">chatter</span>]])''</small></span> → Nate • (chatter)

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing your signature! Note: it's usually best to reply on the same talk page. —Anomalocaris (talk) 23:21, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Oops

Hi Nate - long long time no bump into. We edit conflicted at ANI and that caused us to give totally different advice. I don't want you to think I disliked your suggestion - my experience is that admins tend to frown on, or ignore, content questions. I do like your suggestion to change how the field reads in that infobox. My apologies for any offense that I may have caused. Best regards. MarnetteD|Talk 22:50, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Mrschimpf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (led by the Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) is conducting a survey for en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Please be aware this survey will close Friday, Dec. 8 at 23:00 UTC.

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:14, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Cartoon Network

cartoonnetwork.ca is the official site of Cartoon Network in Canada, and is absolutely reliable. I ask you to stop removing content that is useful to people researching Cartoon Network Canada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spacedude2169 (talk • contribs) 02:06, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Spacedude you would do well to read WP:PRIMARY which is the reason people are removing your edits on these items. Canterbury Tail talk 03:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Rust Craft

Thanks for your edits to Rust Craft Greeting Card Company! That's great information there, but do you have a citation for it? --BrianCUA (talk) 04:01, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

WMVT

Hello, I am wondering why you deleted 36.4 and 36.5 the music stations for pbs? Those channels are still on television.

Deletionists

Hi Mr. Schimpf, may I call you Nate? Thank you for agreeing with me on the AfD for Observer Media Group. Now, I do not know if you are an Admin, but I just thought I'd point out that Reddogsix (talk · contribs) doesn't seem to respond to messages or pings, and he seems to continue to nominate deletions on perfectly solid start-up articles. However, I notice that the user nominated Epic Signal for deletion 90 minutes after creation, and it looks even better sourced and complete than Observer Media Group. Do you have a recommended course of action? Cheers and happy editing, --SVTCobra (talk) 00:57, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

From Stave one of Dickens A Christmas Carol Old Marley was as dead as a door-nail. Mind! I don’t mean to say that I know, of my own knowledge, what there is particularly dead about a door-nail. I might have been inclined, myself, to regard a coffin-nail as the deadest piece of ironmongery in the trade. But the wisdom of our ancestors is in the simile; and my unhallowed hands shall not disturb it, or the Country’s done for. You will therefore permit me to repeat, emphatically, that Marley was as dead as a door-nail. So you see even Charles was looking for a reliable source :-) Thank you for your contributions to the 'pedia. ~ MarnetteD|Talk 23:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Butterbean Cafe

But Who’s gonna score the music for the upcoming show — Preceding unsigned comment added by Candlebox Spacehog (talk • contribs) 02:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)