User talk:ACase0000

Jesus Lover0000, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Jesus Lover0000! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Greeneville

You're welcome to make contributions to any article, but please note Wikipedia is not a WP:TRAVELGUIDE. Also, the statement "There are many stores in Greeneville" is an entirely subjective statement and doesn't belong in an encyclopedia, unless supported by a citation. Wikipedia requires reliable, verifiable sources, which your edits lack. Bms4880 (talk) 22:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

East Tennessee

Please note that Sequatchie County is officially part of Middle Tennessee. This is discussed in the third paragraph, under the "Topography" subsection. Bms4880 (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm Orlady. Your recent edit to the page Oak Ridge, Tennessee appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 18:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. To keep the continuing conversation in one place, I replied to your comment on my talk page. --Orlady (talk) 04:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, again. I replied again. --Orlady (talk) 12:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ashland City, Tennessee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |population_as_of = [2013

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok Sorry i did not know that i did that. User:Jesus Lover0000

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Springfield, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Springfield High School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok sorry!!

Population data

Where are you getting these population numbers? The census website shows different numbers from the ones you're adding. Bms4880 (talk) 15:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

On what Articles are Referencing?

On LaFollette, Tennessee, you added "8000" as a population estimate. On Ashland City, Tennessee, you changed the population to "4575". Where are you getting these numbers? Bms4880 (talk) 14:07, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Bms I was just estimating population and LaFollette's Population hadn't been changed since the 2000 census. I am sorry if i bothered you with my edits I am so sorry.

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phenix City, Alabama, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hub City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Sources, capital letters, census populations, etc.

Hi. After seeing several of your recent edits, such as your edits to Baileyton, Tennessee, Kimball, Tennessee, and Orme, Tennessee, I'd like to alert you to a few more aspects of the often-bewildering topic of "how we do things at Wikipedia".

First, please remember that Wikipedia cannot accept original research, which includes presenting your unpublished personal knowledge as fact. If you want to make statements like "Most residents in Baileyton work in Greeneville or other nearby cities," please try to find and cite a published reliable source (such as a newspaper article or a local planning report) that substantiates that information. I'm not going to challenge that statement (I'm saying this isn't true), but we should try not to publish facts that we can't verify by citing sources.

Second, please do not replace official census population values with estimates of population. The official census numbers are the ones from the censuses that are done every 10 years. (Many articles still have 2000 data, and it would be very helpful to update this with data from 2010. Get that from the Bureau of the Census Factfinder2 website -- search for the city and state, then look for 2010 Table DP-1. For a reference citation to a particular place's data, make a permalink to the individual Census data table with the "bookmark" function there.) It's OK for an article to include a more recent population estimate in addition to the official value from the last 10-year census, but please don't delete an official number and replace it with an estimate. (And if you add an estimate, cite the source where you found it.)

Third, Wikipedia's Manual of Style calls for us to use standard English rules for use of upper case (capital letters) and lower case (small letters) in article text. This means that capital letters are used for the first letter of the first word in a sentence, proper nouns (like people's names, the names of places like Baileyton and Tennessee, the names of companies, and certain other words like the "I" in "Interstate 81"). It's not always clear whether a word should be capitalized, but I think you will find unanimous agreement that many of the words you capitalized in the Baileyton article aren't proper nouns that should be capitalized. (I'm referring here to "residents", "cities", "several", "restaurants", "gas stations", and "stores".) There are similar issues in some of the other articles you edited recently. --Orlady (talk) 15:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok I am Sorry And on Orme Tennessee that is the Official Estimate of Population and don't be so Rude i was Going fix what i did i noticed that i had did some things Wrong, I am sorry I Upset you and do it way the you think it should be Thanks again I am Sorry Orlady.

Population estimates

Please note we use population data from the U.S. Census. They provide the official numbers, and they provide the estimates. We don't do the estimates ourselves, we get them from the Census website. If there is no data for a community on the Census website, we leave the population blank. Bms4880 (talk) 16:34, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok, and What you article are you talking about ? If it is Strawberry Plains, TN I found a 2007 census estimate on City-Data.com is that ok to Use, Sir ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesus Lover0000 (talk • contribs)

Regardless of what article it is, we should not cite city-data.com in Wikipedia. It is not a reliable source -- because users can add content and it isn't always clear who uploaded the content or where it came from. Anyway, there was an official census in 2010, so it's unlikely that a 2007 estimate is useful content for an article.

I posted a link to the Census factfinder2 website above (in an earlier message). Please use that source instead of city-data.com. The Census Bureau is a reliable source for both official census results and official census estimates.

PS - Please sign your talk page comments. Four tildes (~~~~) will generate a formatted, dated, signature. --Orlady (talk) 12:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank You Orlady, 14:35, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Camp Creek, Tennessee

Hi, I'm Thane. Jesus Lover0000, thanks for creating Camp Creek, Tennessee!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide references for this page.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.  ● Thane — formerly Guðsþegn  19:15, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

New stub articles for rural communities

Hi. I want to give you some pointers for the articles you are creating for unincorporated communities in rural Tennessee.

References.

1. References are needed. Every place worthy of any article (and some that don't deserve articles, such as trailer parks) can be located in the USGS Geographic Names information system. That's one good reference. Go to this page to run a search for the place you care about. You will get to a record for the place. The first record in the data entry is an ID number. To generate a reference footnote pointing to the GNIS page, insert the ID number where the X's are in the following string, then insert the string after the period at the end of a sentence: <ref>{{gnis|XXXXXXX}}</ref> As an example, the code <ref>{{gnis|1297226}}</ref> will generate a footnote reference for the Persia, Tennessee page on GNIS.
2. I see that you figured out how to make a heading for a References section. To get the reference footnotes to appear in that section, insert the template {{reflist}} below that heading.

Latitude and longitude.

You can add lat-long coordinates to your article by copying the coordinates from GNIS into the {{coord}} template. For example, the code string {{coord|display=title|36.3306503|-83.0871099}} creates a template for the location of Saint Clair, Tennessee and puts it in the top right corner of the article. The coordinates link to a page that provides access to online maps (check it out!).

WikiProject

If you are creating articles about places in Tennessee, add them to the state Wikiproject by putting the template {{WikiProject Tennessee}} on the article talk page.

See Saint Clair, Tennessee to see how I edited one of your articles to do these things. Happy editing! --Orlady (talk) 23:58, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Fish Springs, Tennessee"

A page you created, Fish Springs, Tennessee, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content, other than external links, categories, "see also" sections, rephrasing of the title, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Dusti^*poke* 16:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Why has it been tagged for speedy deletion? I wasn't finished creating it. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Jesus Lover0000! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dusti*poke* 16:19, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Fish Springs, Tennessee

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Fish Springs, Tennessee requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Dusti^*poke* 16:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Before placing a page "live", may I suggest you create it in your Userspace? You can do this by creating a page such as User:Jesus_Lover0000/Pagename. Once done, you can Move the page to the main namespace and re-name the page to the title of the article. Dusti^*poke* 16:28, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank You! I will try that. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 16:31, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback

Hello, I answered your question at the Teahouse. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 17:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Greeneville motto

Where is "Home of Andrew Johnson" listed as Greeneville's official motto? Bms4880 (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't know but is listed on the welcome signs to the town as Home Of Andrew Johnson, I was trying to help. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

That doesn't necessarily mean it's the motto (note there is a difference between nicknames and mottos). The motto will normally be mentioned on the town's website, or in its official seal. Bms4880 (talk) 17:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

We'll add it as a nickname for now. Bms4880 (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

I've had a long and peculiar career of maintaining List of city nicknames in the United States and lists that it includes, like List of city nicknames in Tennessee, and I will state categorically that "home of Andrew Johnson" is a good description of Greeneville (a fact that belongs in the article lead), but it isn't a motto, and I have found no reliable sources that identify it as a nickname or slogan. Furthermore, this online forum (which is not a source to be cited in a Wikipedia article -- forums are not reliable sources) makes me think that the city has never had a motto or slogan.

Not all cities have mottoes or nicknames. That's not necessarily bad. --Orlady (talk) 19:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 05:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I get nicknames and Mottoes mixed up sorry, "Home of Andrew Johnson" is all welcome signs and city limit signs that lead into the town. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 05:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Foothills Mall (Tennessee) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Goody's

Greeneville Commons (Greeneville, Tennessee) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to GNC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky)

The article Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable mall. No independent refs or evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

I have a Question what do you mean by not being notable? And Could you help me out with it fixing the problem. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 14:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

At Wikipedia, "notability" is defined by WP:Notability. That covers "general" notability. For notability of businesses, also see WP:ORG. If you think the mall is notable, you need to provide reliable third-party sources, as discussed on those pages. --Orlady (talk) 14:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

You can remove the proposed deletion template from the article if you disagree with it, but I recommend fixing the issue first by adding sources that show it meets the criteria of WP:ORG. If you remove the template without demonstrating that the topic is notable, you can expect that the nominator will start a deletion discussion at WP:AFD. If you agree that the mall isn't notable, you don't have to do anything. --Orlady (talk) 14:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok thanks i have look for some sources and refs but i don't know where to look if you can find some add some thanks. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Try this link: http://books.google.com/books?id=8eFSK4o--M0C&pg=PA634 (the mall is discussed on page 635)

The effects of tornadoes on the traditional downtown of Middlesboro, as discussed in that source and in [1] and [2], are a topic that deserves coverage in Middlesboro, Kentucky. --Orlady (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok thank you!! You are so Kind! Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middlesboro Mall (Middlesboro, Kentucky) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

I Hope someone can find some way to keep this article Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 16:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mount Carmel, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2010 Census (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Northshore Town Center

Until this development has more than 8 stores, it does not warrant mention in the "Retail" section of Knoxville, Tennessee. There are five dozen shopping centers up and down Kingston Pike that have greater retail activity. Bms4881 (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I was just Trying to Help, Sorry! Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 05:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Northshore Town Center for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northshore Town Center is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northshore Town Center until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orlady (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Why?? It deserves to be on Wikipedia. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 14:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, but I can't see any indication that it passes WP:ORG, which is the Wikipedia standard for notability of a business. Shopping centers like this one are very common. --Orlady (talk) 15:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Ok, it is Similar to Turkey Creek in Knoxville and it has a page, More stores are expected to come to Northshore Town Center. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Both shopping centers are outdoors and near interstate exits, but that doesn't make them similar. The Turkey Creek article is also a bit of trivial fluff in its current form, but I believe that the Turkey Creek complex likely can be demonstrated to be notable, due to factors like its massive size, the controversy that occurred over environmental impacts of its development, and the state and local government subsidies it received. I don't see that for North Shore. --Orlady (talk) 15:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

I understand, I was just trying to help by creating it. --Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 15:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

It's clear that you are trying to help! :-) --Orlady (talk) 16:11, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for helping! :-) Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 16:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Page userified

Hi there, I've moved the Northshore Town Center page to your userspace as a userspace draft per the result of its AfD. It's located at User:ACase0000/Northshore Town Center. Good luck! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks!!!!! Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

South Central, Tennessee

Is this the name of this community or just the school? The link you provided points to a community named Mount Carmel, the school has a Chuckey address, and "South Central" doesn't appear on road or topo maps. Bms4880 (talk) 18:00, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

The Community's Name is South Central, I have been there many times, It is small. There are several other communities that have articles that don't appear on maps. Mount Carmel is another name for the Community, Mount Carmel is also the name of several churches in the area. But the Name of the Community is Ssuth Central. Jesus Lover0000 (talk) 06:16, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC Dylan Dreyer (August 10)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dylan Dreyer.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:02, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi will you please Help me find some references, I would appreciate it. i have found a few but they aren't good ones. Thanks! ACase0000 (talk) 16:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

At the bottom of the box with the decline reason on the AfC, there's links listed under "Find sources." See if any of them show any good sources. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank You so Much Jackmcbarn!! ACase0000 (talk) 16:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NBC Nightly News, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Gregory and Peter Alexander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NBC Nightly News may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Peter Alexander (journalist|Peter Alexander]] (White House Correspondent)

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:31, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks, I didn't Know i did that thank you for telling me. :) ACase0000 (talk) 17:44, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NBC News may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Chris Jansing]] – MSNBC's ''[[Jansing and Company]'' anchor & NBC News correspondent

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:04, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks i did not see it i fixed it!! ACase0000 (talk) 18:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Jill Rappaport

Hello, ACase0000, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Jill Rappaport, appears to be directly copied from http://www.today.com/id/36338485/ns/today/t/jill-rappaport/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Jill Rappaport if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 06:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi, I used some stuff from www.today.com, but i changed some to update it, I am not finished working on the article. ACase0000 (talk) 06:59, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for creating the new article on Jill Rappaport! I flagged some minor issues for review while I was doing new pages patrol, but it looks like you're off to a solid start. Keep up the good work! Rinne na dTrosc (talk) 13:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

You are welcome! and Thank you for the kind words. ACase0000 (talk) 14:23, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

It looks like you haven't restored "award-winning" yet. You are entirely correct that if it's used in other journalists' articles, you should feel free to use it here. So be my guest if you feel strongly about it. I apologize for any frustration I caused. All the best, Rinne na dTrosc (talk) 22:39, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

No hard feelings, Thank you Rinne na dTrosc. ACase0000 (talk) 04:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

• Well, as an adjective it should be written "award-winning", and we don't add such adjectives to the lead: it's puffery. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 18:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kristen Welker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Greeneville population

Why was this reverted? The census website [3] gives 15,062. Where are you getting 15,198? Bms4880 (talk) 20:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

I got it from the 2010 census website before it shutdown, And i Know good and well Greeneville's population isn't declining, I am sorry Just fix it the way you like it and the way you think it should be. ACase0000 (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rock Island, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock Island State Park (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello ACase0000, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Jill Rappaport has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 18:07, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

A lot of new users don't understand that not only can you not just copy and paste, but that it really does have to be in your own words. The two paragraphs I deleted were obviously from [4]. I know it's not easy but you just have to find an entirely new way to get the information you want into the article. Don't worry about the bit about being blocked, that only happens to people who ignore our policy, and I don't think you will be one of them. You might also want to read WP:ISNOT (not about copyvio but I think you would benefit from it) Dougweller (talk) 18:11, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank you. I will read that. Thank You, Dougweller.

I saw your post on my talk page. I know that another editor commented on the article - a lot of editors, some quite experienced, still don't understand our copyvio policy (I just saw several on an article talk page who were arguing about whether a YouTube video was appropriate without noticing that it was a copyvio link, ie something somebody had copied from TV and added to YouTube). Don't worry about it.

I'm very fond of Ingles by the way, I see you've been editing that article. And Earth Fare in Asheville. Dougweller (talk) 19:08, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

OK Thanks!! ACase0000 (talk) 19:12, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to NBC News may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Campbell Brown]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok Sorry ACase0000 (talk) 06:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 09:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 09:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 20:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 20:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your post to my talk page

I missed the bit about NBCintern13 when I posted this to his/her talk page:"Thanks for trying to to help out here, but among other things you really should be leaving WP:Edit summaries to explain your edits. A general comment about the articles - these lists of names really should only include those people who already have articles. That way we are fairly sure they meet our criteria for notability at WP:CREATIVE. Thanks." I am know following up about the possible sock puppetry, thanks. You should also leave edit summaries regularly and I thought you might like to know about red links in such articles. I usually remove them unless it's obvious to me that an article could be created about them. Dougweller (talk) 08:52, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok I did know that i was supposed to, I will start Thanks. ACase0000 (talk) 05:57, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NBC News, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Voice (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Natalie Morales, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:20, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok sorry ACase0000 (talk) 05:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

WBIR

I need some help in The article WBIR someone keeps adding inaccurate information by changing and removing a news anchor the person they put in her place is only filling in for her, I Just keep adding the anchor back and they keep adding the fill-in in the anchors place, i don't know what to do. ACase0000 (talk) 05:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

You should provide an explanation at the article's talk page, and you should add a reliable source that confirms that Meckles is indeed the weekend evenings anchor. Reliable third-party sources are something the article could use quide a few more of, especially in the section on news operations. If the IP editor keeps reverting you despite the addition of a source and without discussing his edits at the talk page, it's time for sterner measures - say, WP:AIV. Huon (talk) 06:51, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, Thanks! Huon, would her biography on the stations website work? ACase0000 (talk) 06:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

At a glance I didn't see her biography on the station website say so, and a third-party source would be preferable anyway, but if it does say so it'll serve. Huon (talk) 08:02, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

OK Thanks!! Huon.

• I noticed your talk message at the AIV talk page before you removed it, (which was the right call, that talk page isn't really the right place) and figured I'd leave you a note. I looked at the bio, and it doesn't specifically address the issue, while we can imply that she still holds the position based on the BIO not being removed/updated, it hasn't been updated in several weeks, and could theoretically be outdated. Can you find anything that lays out the situation explicitly? I would also suggest using more informative edit summaries, in the hope that the IP editor will get your message that way, as well as continued attempts to initiate a discussion on the IP editor's talk page. Monty₈₄₅ 05:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Monty I have contacted WBIR and they told me that she still works for them, she is just on an assignment, the IP also removed two other people that also still work for the stations. ACase0000 (talk) 05:41, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Live at Five at Four for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Live at Five at Four is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Live at Five at Four until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nate • (chatter) 21:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

And On this article i believe should stay. ACase0000 (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

10News Today (WBIR)

It's at least a plausible redirect, thus the redirection, but usually local newscasts don't need separate articles about each show they produce. I apologize for not letting you know about it. Nate • (chatter) 05:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

That is Fine Thank You, for Replying. ACase0000 (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wendy Phillips, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Home of the Brave (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jim Maceda

The article Jim Maceda has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. reddogsix (talk) 06:43, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry i forgot to add some i will be doing that. ACase0000 (talk) 14:14, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

I Just added a reference. ACase0000 (talk) 14:19, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rohit Kachroo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rohit Kachroo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 16:12, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Why is this happening??? This a real person. ACase0000 (talk) 16:25, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Please read and get to grips with WP:GNG. My neighbour, Peter Smith is a real person, and has a good job, but he is not notable. Our local paper has a great journalist. he writes many articles, but he is not notable. If you can find things in [[W{:RS]] places that show that the gentleman is notable, great. Add those to the article to show that he is notable. Fiddle Faddle 16:36, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks could you help in finding sources and references, I found all i could, and i was saying that he was real person because the thing at the top of the article said he wasn't. ACase0000 (talk) 16:48, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

I fear that is the problem. You have probably found all that exist. Something BY him is not the same as something ABOUT him. We need things that are about him for an article to stay. Fiddle Faddle 16:51, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

In the one source i put it tells a little about him that is all i could find, and i found his twitter account but i know that twitter and facebook accounts aren't good sources . ACase0000 (talk) 16:55, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

In response to you posting on my talk page; I deleted this article some five hours after you first created it, which I feel is enough time for you to finish it as far as is possible. In the article as submitted by you there was a clear lack of notbility expressed. If, as you say in this thread, that is all that can be said about this person then clearly a Wikipedia article about his is not merited. Merely being a real person does not of itself generate encyclopedic notability. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:46, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Well i had to go do other things, and i was researching more about the man. ACase0000 (talk) 05:20, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

As you have seen, articles in poor shape cannot remain. So please ay I suggest you look at WP:AFC for the future? Nothing prevents you from restarting this article, but it must have references in reliable sources which prove notability to remain here. Fiddle Faddle 09:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Timtrent Fiddle Faddle , I have looked at notability and reliable sources many times, but i have not looked at WP:AFC i guess i need to. I am not just some person who creates articles just to create them i create them because i think they are useful. I may have only been on Wikipedia since May of this year but i am learning how and how not to do things. Thanks for your Help. ACase0000 (talk) 14:25, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

I will always help someone who is willing and happy to learn. This essay may be of use to you. IT deals with creation of an article that is likely to survive here. I've written quite a few and know something of the art required. :) Fiddle Faddle 16:15, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Well Thank you so so Much, Will look at That. ACase0000 (talk) 05:41, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

You can also create draft articles in your user space. That is, you can make subpages of User:ACase0000. Page names in user space have forms like User:ACase0000/My New Page, where "My New Page" is a placeholder for the title of the articles you want to start. Put {{userspace draft}} at the top of the page so it won't be indexed like a "real article." That's what I do when I have an idea for an article, but don't have time to get into good enough shape for the encyclopedia. When I'm done with a draft, I can move it to article space. --Orlady (talk) 01:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

Well Thank User:Orlady i will try that. ACase0000 (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

WBIR and WTNZ

Even though WBIR produces its morning and evening newscast, that doesn't mean both stations are sister stations. Neither one have Local Marketing, Joint Sales or Shared service agreements. Many stations have this news-producing agreement, that doesn't mean they are sister stations. Therefore WTNZ & WBIR are not officially Sister-Stations. Csworldwide1 (talk) 14:55, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

OK thanks!!! ACase0000 (talk) 14:56, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Squawk on the Street may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Jim Cramer]] (2011-present

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:06, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm CourtneyBonnick. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Blue Mountain Mystery, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. http://www.sodor-island.net/ and http://ttte.wikia.com/wiki/Thomas_%26_Friends are not reliable source because they are fansites. Thank you. CourtneyBonnick (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok thank you!!! ACase0000 (talk) 21:45, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

If you happen to be a Thomas th Tank Engine fan, there are loads of pages on the far less rigid http://train.spottingworld.com which is a place tTtTE fans seem to enjoy editing. Have a look at http://train.spottingworld.com/Thomas_the_Tank_Engine as a useful entry point. It has the look and feel of Wikipedia, and a lot of the articles started out as Wikipedia articles (that is legal as long as they are attributed to it) Fiddle Faddle 21:52, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank You!!! User:Timtrent Can I use trainspottingworld.com as a source? ACase0000 (talk) 22:03, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

I think as a source it carries the same reliability that Wikipedia does, perhaps a smidgen less. Using it as a source would be unwise. Fiddle Faddle 11:47, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank You User:Timtrent!!! ACase0000 (talk) 13:48, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interstate 181 (Tennessee), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bill Jenkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

List of incorporated cities and towns in Tennessee

Every time i edit that page i some how get logged out of wikipedia, i am and was trying to updated the population of cities and towns on it. I was logged in both times and when i went to save or preview the page wikipedia says i am logged out why is this happening? ACase0000 (talk) 05:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Does the same happen in another web browser (Firefox, IE, Chrome)? If you only have one, which one? Gryllida (talk) 07:46, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Gryllida I use Firefox. ACase0000 (talk) 07:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

To editors ACase0000 and Gryllida: This same thing happened to me a few days ago. I asked at the Village Pump and their suggestion was to clear my browser's cache. According to email, Wikipedia recently suffered some sort of security issue that prompted them to make some of us change our passwords. It may have something to do with that. Anyway, try clearing your browser cache of cookies, pages and everything, and see if that helps. – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 16:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

This worked for me; please let us know if it works for you.

In Firefox that's Tools → Options → Network (tab) → Clear now (button) – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX!

Thanks I will Try that ACase0000 (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Warrensburg, Tennessee

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. ACase0000, thanks for creating Warrensburg, Tennessee!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Needs categories. Otherwise looks good. Marked reviewed.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Sulfurboy I forgot to added categories, thank you for reminding me :) --ACase0000 (talk) 13:27, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

I need some Help.

I need some help redirecting the article Interstate 169 (which is already a redirect to another article) to the article Tennessee State Route 22.

Done.--Launchballer 09:49, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank You!!! ACase0000 (talk) 14:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Joe Fryer

The article Joe Fryer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable, sources don't seem reliable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 09:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 09:55, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I gave two sources/references that say he joined NBC News. What else does the article need? 14:13, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) May I suggest you read WP:RS with care. What you need are obviously reliable sources, independent of the subject that discuss the subject. As an example of what will not work, a TV schedule showing that he is on air is insufficient, but an article in (eg0 The Wall Street Journal saying that his appearance on air was responsible for a plague of locusts will be just fine. Fiddle Faddle 14:31, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks User:Timtrent ACase0000 (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Fryer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Fryer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Fryer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:19, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I think it should stay, There many articles out there don't have any, Will you help me find some good sources/refs Please, User:TenPoundHammer?? I thought that they were fine 2 of refs conform that he joined the network. ACase0000 (talk) 21:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

There is a difference between 'showbiz title tattle coverage' and good solid coverage. The organ that is less than reliable also contains PR pieces, so it sins doubly. Often TV presenters are plain not notable, and we have to accept it. THey tend to be ten a penny, so a heavyweight refernece is required to show genuine notability. Go to it with a will and find one or two on this chap. Fiddle Faddle 22:07, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Joe Fryer

A story by him would not work, because it would be a primary source. Has someone else written specifically about him? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes i found one from http://www.twincities.com that basiclly says he joined NBC. would that work? ACase0000 (talk) 22:12, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

You mean this article? That seems like a decent start. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:26, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Yes that one. ACase0000 (talk) 04:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Jim Maceda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Maceda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Maceda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:28, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Why isn't it suitable? ACase0000 (talk) 04:17, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

I suspect I have commended WP:RS to you before. Please study it in detail, and develop an instinct for what is and is not reliable. You may wish to revisit the deletion discussion where your opinion, because it is not based on anything more than liking the article (seriously) will be discounted. I suggest that you post agreement with the editor who has said so, strike out your first statement, and, at the FOOT of the discussion, post a new one based, for example, on the fact that the article now has one Reliable Source.

You need to know, too, that I have no idea who Maceda is, nor do I care. What I am attempting to achieve is guiding you towards creating better articles which are not nominated at once for deletion. I know you are capable of doing this. Fiddle Faddle 13:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

User:Timtrent I know i am capable too i have creating articles that haven't been nominated. I thank you for your help and words incouragment. ACase0000 (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Stephanie Gosk

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. ACase0000, thanks for creating Stephanie Gosk!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 3

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 20:21, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks!!! ACase0000 (talk) 04:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Mississippi State

This article seems redundant. That's why I merged it.

WhisperToMe (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

WhisperToMe If this doesn't need it's own article then why does University, Mississippi? the articles are the same they both highlight the same thing an area that encompasses a University? ACase0000 (talk) 16:42, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

I wasn't aware of that one. I'll start a discussion about them WhisperToMe (talk) 16:59, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_United_States#Redundant_location_articles.3F WhisperToMe (talk) 18:51, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

IRC

Have you ever considered joining an IRC channel? The highways project has a channel for roads editors (WP:HWY/IRC) though we probably don't talk about roads as much as we should. There are many, many other channels, but I'll leave you to discover those. Anyway, it's a good resource if you need quick advice on just about anything Wikipedia related. Since you seem to be from Tennessee, the channel is most active in the evening. Hope to see you there! –Fredddie™ 04:59, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the Invite i will think about it and yes I live in Tennessee. ACase0000 (talk) 14:12, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennessee State Route 351, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camp Creek (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bob Becker (meteorologist)

The article Bob Becker (meteorologist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources, notability not established.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 08:27, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I don't understand Why is this happening? ACase0000 (talk) 14:42, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I can't rememebr if I showed you this essay. If I did I apologise. if not, please read it. The reason this is happening is that the articles are not referenced in reliable sources except with either passing mentions or PR style mentions.

"Fred is joining us, rejoice!" is a PR mention. "The weather was forecast by Fred" is a passing mention.

Unfair as it seems, Fred needs to be discussed in sources as being notable in some way. Without that he is just another man doing just another job. His happens to be on TV. Fiddle Faddle 14:53, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I can't remember if you showed me the essay but i will read it, and I get why now thanks for explaining. ACase0000 (talk) 15:08, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

For now, with a tiny tweak, I think I have declined the PROD successfully, but others may have different views. I have my doubts about the article surviving a full deletion discussion, though. If you want it to remain please look at finding some heavyweight sources that discuss the gentleman. Fiddle Faddle 15:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thank you!!! ACase0000 (talk) 15:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Bob Becker (meteorologist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Becker (meteorologist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Becker (meteorologist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WWGB (talk) 23:03, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2013

Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Final push for 2013 goals A New York state of merger Templates, Lua, and sister projects	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, IA, MD, MI, and PA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—EdwardsBot (talk) 03:13, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Protecting Pages

I would like to know if someone would/could protect List of personalities on The Weather Channel from unregistered and IP users?? and there has been alot of problems on that page.

ACase (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

For future reference, the place to request page protection or semi-protection is WP:RFPP. In this particular case I don't see enough of a problem to warrant protection; the IP edits all seem to be in good faith, and the last that had to be reverted by a non-IP was almost two weeks ago. Huon (talk) 19:11, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Ok Thanks i didn't know where to go. ACase0000 (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 1 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[US 61]], [[US 64]], [[US 70]] and [[US 79]] to [[US 51]], US 64, [US 70 and US 79 in [[Memphis, Tennessee|Memphis]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 68 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• north, just after leaving Spring City it turns back to north crosses over [[Waldens Ridge]] into [[Cumberland County, Tennessee where the route ends at [[US Route 127]] (US-127) in [[Crossville,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:54, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Gatlinburg Bypass

The "Major intersections" heading is a standard of the USRD project. Either "Major intersections" or "Exit list". This road has no exits, so the "Major intersections" heading is to be used. If you have a problem with this, take it up with the project. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 06:31, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Ok. on State routes and such if they have a interchange with a road that isn't a main road it is listed. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I want to apologize if my first statement in this thread sounded mad and harsh. I think new (or inexperienced) editors should check with the project and their standards before just diving in to an article. You have done well, but have some ways to go. I am still learning. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 07:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

No Problem, You were just trying to make a point. I have been on Wikipedia since May of 2013 i believe. --ACase0000 (talk) 07:48, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

I have been on since 2008 (or earlier). I am still learning tips and tricks. Remember to check with the USRD folks. Also, go into the IRC chat room, as well. They are willing to help. Allen (Morriswa) (talk) 07:58, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

OK thanks. ACase0000 (talk) 08:03, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 67 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• some gradual elevation and eventually crossing a section of bridges over the Doe River at the [[Valley Forge, Tennessee|Valley Forge] community just out side of the Elizabethton City limits (a

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:52, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Tennessee State Route 354

Hello ACase0000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tennessee State Route 354 for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Dianakc (talk) 18:58, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

As reviewing administrator, I of course did not speedy delete it--speedy doesn't apply to roads, but please quickly add more information and some references. DGG ( talk ) 19:23, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 354

Just a heads up, but I would get on expanding that "article" pronto. A few years ago, a bunch of pages for Ohio State Routes were deleted because they only had an infobox and a single sentence. In this case, your single sentence doesn't even define where or when about the highway. Imzadi 1979 → 22:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

I am Sorry i did not Think i will get to editing it. ACase0000 (talk) 05:58, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Another invitation to join IRC

Hey, there! If you'd like advice on how to improve your editing skills for articles on Tennessee highways, I highly suggest you join WP:HWY/IRC. It is very helpful for collaboration between editors, and I realize you've already been told this before, but it really does help getting editing advice in real time. The channel starts to get most active just about this time of the evening, so I hope to see you there. TCN7JM 23:50, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Top of The World, Tennessee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top of The World, Tennessee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top of The World, Tennessee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orlady (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Braden, Union County, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norris Lake

Sharps Chapel, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Norris Lake

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tennessee State Route 344

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. ACase0000, thanks for creating Tennessee State Route 344!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Tennessee State Route 349

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. ACase0000, thanks for creating Tennessee State Route 349!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. .

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 02:38, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Douglas Lake, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pigeon River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Jane Pauley may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (all three live from the New York City studios) and with current Today weather anchor [[Al Roker]] (who was live in [[Pasadena, California]]} reunited to co-host a special reunion edition of [[Today (U.S. TV program)|Today]].<ref>http://www.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:25, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 218 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• It currently begins at Tennessee State Route 69|SR-69]] north of [[Paris, Tennessee|Paris]] the route heads south to junction with [[Tennessee State Route

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabe Gutierrez

Hello ACase0000,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gabe Gutierrez for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Lemonmelonsuperstar (talk) 17:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2013

Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features 2013 in review The Moon is rising: our Lua progress so far Looking ahead to 2014 The Maple Syrup Report	State and national updates Project news in brief Task force reports for CA, GA, MI, OH, PA, UT, WA, and WV
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Thank you for your contributions to the WCYB-TV page! WABN44 (talk) 13:51, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Wow Thank You so much. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:06, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Regarding lists of former employees appearing in television station articles

Hello, I noticed that you re-added an unreferenced list of former employees in the WCYB-TV television station article and justified the list's reinstatement in your edit summary by stating that "they all once worked there". Please read the information regarding the inclusion of this type of list that appears in that article's talk page. It is not a case of whether or not someone was actually formerly employed at a given station that determines whether or not they are appropriately included in an article. A consensus was established several years ago in Wikipedia regarding how these kinds of lists, I'm sure you'll find the information on the the WCYB-TV article talk page to be informative in this matter. Thank you for your time. 70.48.216.22 (talk) 01:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 168 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''State Route 168''' ('''SR-168''', known as '''Governor [[John Sevier]] Highway''', is a state highway in [[Knox County,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vonore, Tennessee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Vonore Middle School], Grades 6-8

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Middlesboro Mall

Mall articles are not supposed to include lists of stores. See WP:NOTDIR. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok sorry @TenPoundHammer: can i list the Anchor store? --ACase0000 (talk) 06:04, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

No, that's not really needed. All you need to say is somewhere in the text, "The mall's anchor stores are X, Y, and Z." No need for it to be a list. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 11:53, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

OK Thanks. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:56, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 148

Think you could even out the precision of the mileages in the junction list? They should all match if they came from the same source, even if that means "4.00" is the correct value. Imzadi 1979 → 21:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Ok sorry @Imzadi1979: --ACase0000 (talk) 06:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PBS NewsHour, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jeffery Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Greene County, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CDP

Hardeman County, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chickasaw State Park

Sullivan County, Tennessee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to CDP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Amis House

The signs might be using "state historic area" in some sort of general sense. It's not listed on the state's list of state-owned historic sites. If it's not state-owned or state-managed, it shouldn't be listed as "protected" by the state government. Bms4880 (talk) 16:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Ok Sorry @Bms4880: Can i put a list that lists "Other protected areas" ? --ACase0000 (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

How about a subsection called "Other historic sites"? Otherwise, anything privately-owned might technically be called "protected." Bms4880 (talk) 16:26, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Okay That sounds Great to me. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:28, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Shelby County, Tennessee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Image:Secondary Tennessee 278.svg|25px]] [[Tennessee State Route 278)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kingsport, Tennessee may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[Northeast State Community College]], [[East Tennessee State University]], [[King University]], [[Carson-Newman University, [[Milligan College]] and the [[University of Tennessee]] have branch

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chris Warren may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Chris Warren (meteorologist)]] (born 197?, American television meteorologist

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:37, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Alphabetizing

What says to alphabetize by the first name instead of the surname? Bms4880 (talk) 16:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Scratch that. It appears Wiki park lists do indeed favor the first name. Bms4880 (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

That is Ok. --ACase0000 (talk) 14:46, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Mike Bettes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Storm chaser and American

Ann Curry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to KCBS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Veronica De La Cruz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KBCW (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to KPIX-TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:53, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at Roberticus's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Roberticus talk 14:57, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rehema Ellis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2008 presidential election (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries are helpful

Hello. If possible could you please leave an edit summary when you edit. Providing a summary before saving your changes to an article allows people to fully and quickly appreciate the reason for your edit. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 07:46, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: To prevent accidentally leaving edit summaries blank, you can easily set up a permanent automatic reminder - just click on the Preferences tab at the top of this page, then click the Editing tab and tick the "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box.

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tale of the Brave, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hope (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Katy Tur) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Katy Tur, ACase0000!

Wikipedia editor Prof. Mc just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A good start to her entry. Hopefully more contributors can come along and fill in the holes.

To reply, leave a comment on Prof. Mc's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

May 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Townsend, Tennessee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Please stop removing the parent categories. If you want to note that the category is under-populated, add {{popcat}}. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:57, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Category:Mosheim, Tennessee, you may be blocked from editing. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:59, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: What???, I created those categories. How can it be vandalism?? And I have not did anything wrong. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

You created them without parent categories, then blanked the page. Blanking the page is an indication that the creator wants them speedy deleted.

I found them in Wikipedia:Database reports/Uncategorized categories, and could have speedily deleted them ... but instead I redirected them to the appropriate county categories.

If you actually want to create categories, then they need parent categories. You could add parent categories and populate them, but since they have so few articles they would probably merged per WP:SMALLCAT. If they contain at least 5 pages, they have a chance of surviving at WP:CFD. Can they pass that number? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:10, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

@BrownHairedGirl: I am sorry, I did not know that they had to have categories within them, Will you let me fix them??, and just so you know I have never vandalized nothing. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead and add the parent categories. But please do remember that small categories will be deleted, so it would be be a good idea to check first that they can be expanded. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:21, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Great Thanks, I am currently working on added some other articles to them. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Good luck. But be careful that the articles you add really belong there. For example U.S. Route 11E, because it passes through many towns, and it would cause massive category clutter if it was categorised by all of them; it should be removed from both Category:Morristown, Tennessee and Category:Mosheim, Tennessee. The roads are already categorised by county, because that is a WP:DEFINING characteristic of them. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:37, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Ok, Will do. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:44, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Well done. I think that the same applies to Tennessee State Route 73, which passes by a lot of towns. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 72 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{TNint

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:51, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Knoxville metropolitan area may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Midtown, Tennessee|Midtown]] (census-designated place

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:41, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thanks - your event last month was amazing! ExpertEditor25 (talk) 05:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Wow, Thank You. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:01, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennessee State Route 94, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackwater, Virginia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Interview request for The Center Line

The editors of The Center Line, the quarterly newsletter of the U.S. Roads WikiProject are asking if you, as an editor new to USRD, would be willing to answer three quick questions for an interview featurette in our next issue.

1. What article(s) are you working on these days?
2. What is your short-term goal for the article(s)? Long-term?
3. What is your favorite highway?

The space to answer these can be found at WP:USRD/NR#New editor interviews. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → 02:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2014

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Railway engines (Thomas & Friends), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Grady (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Mosheim

If you want to leave a grammatically incorrect statement in that section, have at it. It's not worth wasting time over. Bms4880 (talk) 15:53, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

@Bms4880: Wow, Sorry!! I think it just sounds better the way i put it but I will do it the way you want. --ACase0000 (talk) 04:11, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Tennessee State Route 840 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{TNint|exit |location=none |exit=50 |road=Veterans Parkway|city1=Blackman}} |notes=}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:56, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shining Time Station, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tom Jackson and Brian O'Connor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to U.S. Route 11E may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 11E Business (Greeneville, Tennessee)|US 11E Business]] and [[Tennessee State Route 70|SR 70]] (Summer Street. SR 70 joins the U.S. Highway for a short distance before heading north as Lonesome

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:18, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people and animals from Thomas & Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Hope. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to WBIR-TV may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• flagship status with WFBC-TV.<ref>Television Factbook #49, WBIR-TV, WFBC-TV Histories, 1980 Edition)</ref>
• *''A Taste for Passi?)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:24, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2014

Volume 7, Issue 3 • Summer 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features The U.S. Roads Portal: A great gateway to the project HWY Cup a success in improving the articles of WikiProject Highways	State and national updates None submitted
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Joan Lunden

added a link pointing to WABC

Tennessee State Route 218

added a link pointing to Henry County Airport

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Tim Burchett

Do you have a source for this information? Personal information like this absolutely needs a reliable source. Bms4880 (talk) 20:47, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

@Bms4880:All I know is that Mr. Burchett appeared on WBIR-TV and said he was/had married his friend Kelly Kimball, there is a story about it on WBIR. Com. ACase0000 (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I've re-added it. Sorry to be a pain, but we have to be careful with biographies of living persons. Bms4880 (talk) 15:03, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

@Bms4880: No problem. ACase0000 (talk) 00:47, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of people and animals from Thomas & Friends, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Forster. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

SR 68

Where is SR 68 secondary? --NE2 21:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

USRD editor said that it was, so I was just putting it back. ACase0000 (talk) 22:06, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

What's "USRD editor"? --NE2 22:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I meant to say a USRD WikiProject editor. User:ACase0000 (talk) 22:18, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm a USRD editor too... --NE2 22:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

I know you are. As am I. ACase0000 (talk) 23:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Reversions

Are we really doing this again? I'm going by what signs and TDOT maps say. Provide a source for your reversions. --NE2 23:50, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, Signs: SR 474 also has Primary signs. Go to the intersection of the road and Veterans Pkwy. ACase0000 (talk) 03:12, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

SR 126 has Primary signs on SR 93. ACase0000 (talk) 03:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Those appear to be sign errors (the ones on SR 474 were probably posted by the county). SR 126 even has a secondary shield on SR 93 south but a primary shield on SR 93 north. When one source is internally inconsistent, it should be discounted; TDOT maps show both as secondary. --NE2 03:17, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok. Have a nice night. ACase0000 (talk) 05:24, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Great Smoky Mountains Parkway

I noticed the updates on the article; the reason I choose not to include US 321 to the banner and component highway is because it appears to be a add-on and not really focused with it, as it follows US 441. So my opinion was US 321 was like the hidden state routes, it's just there. As for the extension along SR 66 to I-40, I read that route online as Winfield Dunn Parkway, thus doesn't appear to be part of the Great Smoky Mountains Parkway. Their was similar questions about it before I removed it in my edits, is their any references that can confirm this as part of the Parkway? --WashuOtaku (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

First off 321 is not hidden. Second: The Traffic Lights say on 66 say Great Smoky mountains Parkway. ACase0000 (talk) 02:18, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Wasn't saying it was hidden, I was trying to reduce the header markers, but those are now gone. As for traffic lights... well, that's true... I dunno. --WashuOtaku (talk) 03:26, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

The markers shouldn't appear there. If there's a single marker for the Great Smoky Mountains Parkway, that can appear at the top of the infobox along with the name of the roadway. However, practices are advancing, and that old method of displaying all of the markers at the top of a box has really become a bad idea. Why? Well, with {{jct}}, we pair the marker graphic with the link to the highway, and that link serves as a caption. For the map in the infobox, we really recommend some sort of caption in |map_notes=. On an infobox dealing with a single highway designation, the marker is captioned by the name of that highway. If you put four markers up there, and none of those markers correspond to the single name below them, there is no caption. By displaying them in the component highways space with {{jct}}, they get captioned, and they get that brief explanation of which parts of the subject highway correspond to which component highways.

In other words, if the GSMP has its own marker, and honestly we shouldn't be misusing the NPS logo as a highway marker, then that's what gets put in |marker_image=, but if there isn't a specific marker, then it goes blank to avoid looking "trashy" as another editor called it. Imzadi 1979 → 10:33, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979: I understand.

Then does that apply to Pellissippi Parkway and the Great Smoky Mountains Expressway?? ACase0000 (talk) 12:08, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Yes, unless all of a named road carries one specific number and the others just overlap various pieces. Let's assume Foobar Highway is the article title, and that it runs from A to B to C to D to E. If from A to E it is Highway 1, but from B to C it's also Highway 2 and from C to D it is also Highway 3, then you can make the infobox use the Highway 1 marker (and name) up top with Foobar Highway as the alternate name, even though the title of the article is Foobar Highway. In that case, I wouldn't even bother with adding Highway 2 and 3 as components. Imzadi 1979 → 21:40, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennessee State Route 355, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Industrial area. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:48, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blue Mountain Mystery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Legge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Happy New Year ACase0000!

Happy New Year!

ACase0000,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. IPadPerson (talk) 15:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2015}} to user talk pages.

Thank You @IPadPerson: ACase0000 (talk) 12:46, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello

It is I, from the Thomas Wiki. :P Jackninja5 (talk) 14:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Hey Jack! ACase0000 (talk) 15:08, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

You are actually my third friend from Wikia I saw here. First being someone who is a rollback here but is an admin on the Club Penguin Wiki and a fellow bureaucrat from the Plants vs. Zombies Wiki. Jackninja5 (talk) 15:11, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Cool!!, Have you seen all the articles I have created? ACase0000 (talk) 15:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Only some of them. Jackninja5 (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Re:Hello!

Hi Jackninja5 (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

How Many articles have you created, that have been deleted? Only three for me. ACase0000 (talk) 15:59, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

TTTE Wikia

Hi ACase0000, Yes I am Thomas fan and no I haven't joined TTTE Wikia. Just a head up 170.24.136.190 has returned in guise of 47.23.44.186. Tell me something do you get people like 170.24.136.190 on TTTE Wikia? CourtneyBonnick (talk) 21:46, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

@CourtneyBonnick:Hi! Yes, then the Admin's block them. They don't tolerate vandalism and profanity. All pages are locked so only registered users can edit. And thanks for the warning. I think you should join! --ACase0000 (talk) 21:51, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

The Pinnacle

I reviewed it and added some things. Note that the complex covers 240 acres, of which 1.3 million square feet (about 30 acres) is floor space. Parking lots, walkways, roads, and green areas will cover the bulk of the rest of the complex, I assume. Bms4880 (talk) 16:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank You @Bms4880: :) :) --ACase0000 (talk) 22:06, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Talk back

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at Talk:Jenna Wolfe#Recent reverts.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 02:17, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Railway engines (Thomas & Friends)

Why did you roll back my changes on Railway engines (Thomas & Friends)? Did I do something wrong? --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

@Dthomsen8: Hello sorry for the late reply, You deleted the Cite Episode templates, those need to stay. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:19, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Page moving

When someone starts being credited under a new name that DOES NOT AUTOMATICALLY mean their page should be retitled. See WP:Recentism and—more importantly—WP:Article titles. Moving Grey DeLisle to "Grey DeLisle-Griffin" is not appropriate at this time. Snuggums (talk / edits) 15:24, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

@SNUGGUMS: Fine, I was just trying to help. Don't be yelling. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry- I wasn't yelling. I'm sure your actions were made in good faith, it just went against naming conventions. Snuggums (talk / edits) 17:08, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015

Your recent editing history at Keith Wickham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Binksternet (talk) 05:34, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Please Read the Message I left on Message Thank You! @Binksternet: --ACase0000 (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Musdan77. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 19 Kids and Counting, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 18:40, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from 19 Kids and Counting. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Musdan77 (talk) 18:41, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

@Musdan77: I am sorry. I didn't relize. Again sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 21:08, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Also do you watch to show at all? If you did you would know who Debbie Query is. --ACase0000 (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but she is not notable enough to be listed - especially without some context for importance -- and certainly not without a reference. Thanks, --Musdan77 (talk) 22:24, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

I am Sorry. Have a Day/Evening @Musdan77:!!! :) --ACase0000 (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Burritt College

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Burritt College, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://tennesseeencyclopedia.net/entry.php?rec=163.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:59, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Burritt College, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2015

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennessee State Route 70, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackwater, Virginia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Edit to Josh Elliott

I saw that you had added back to the Josh Elliott article that he was now also with NBC News. While in your edit summary you wrote that he was seen anchoring Dateline, no inline citation was added to the article. As a user who has been around for quite a while, I am sure that you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons, but information for living people must have references.

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, GauchoDude (talk) 15:16, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

@GauchoDude: I am sorry. And yes I am familiar with the rules with Biographies. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:03, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at IPadPerson's talk page.
Message added 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

IPadPerson (talk) 14:44, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, ACase0000. You have new messages at Ged UK's talk page.
Message added 15:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GedUK  15:20, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurel Fork Railway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conasauga, Tennessee. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

AGF

Hello A. I am glad that you reverted this but I have to say that you should (at the very least) be careful when using the term vandalism. Especially in a case like this where my edit summary clearly explained why I was making the edit. Now I consider this a "no harm no foul" situation but there are other editors out there that would frown on this or make a bigger case of it. I hope that you enjoy the rest of your weekend on WikiP and especially off. MarnetteD|Talk 15:01, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't read it all the way. The same to you too! :) --ACase0000 (talk) 15:06, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know what happened. Cheers. MarnetteD|Talk 15:07, 18 April 2015 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends (series 19)

Hey there! A friendly note about the activity going on with the article: The disputed content is unsourced, from both parties – you and the IPs. Therefore what I'm seeing can easily be considered edit warring. Please work with the other editors to establish a consensus, or source the current information to support it not being removed. Continuing to go back and forth battling it out isn't going to accomplish anything without some concrete evidence of what is the more accurate material. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

@MusikAnimal: I have added sources to the page. And in the sources is are trailers of the episodes. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Further please do not recreate unsourced pages. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 16:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sodor's Legend of the Lost Treasure

The article Sodor's Legend of the Lost Treasure has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film, only coverage is a primary source and imdb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BOVINEBOY2008 12:48, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

WOW! Why. :( I am so disappointed and upset. --ACase0000 (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

@Bovineboy2008: What if I add a source that says it will be shone in theaters in Australia? --ACase0000 (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Any kind of secondary coverage would do, ie no press releases or articles from the production company. Existence is not notability (for films). BOVINEBOY2008 18:42, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

@Bovineboy2008: Take a look at the ref I put on the article. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:07, 22 May 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2015

Volume 8, Issue 2 • Spring 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features Route description 101 The nitty gritty of in-depth research	State and national updates Editor updates In other project news...
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 12:09, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Sulfurboy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stephanie Gosk, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sulfurboy (talk) 14:54, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

I am sorry @Sulfurboy:. Jenna Wolfe, Stephanie's partner stated on the Today show that they lived in Manhattan. I understand what you are saying. --ACase0000 (talk) 15:00, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Reply

Really? I didn't know that!, I've been watching Thomas for a long time and some wiki sites say he finished in 2002. Wow, I didn't know he narrated until 2003. thanks for letting me know, sorry if I undid your edit too. FrozenFan2 (talk) 20:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

No Problem! :) And You are welcome. Have a nice Day! :) --ACase0000 (talk) 20:15, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph May, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casualty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Greene County, Tennessee may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ** Tim Shelton (South Greene

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:55, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

Ronan

I apologize if I appeared rude. I only meant to be factual and give my reasons. I appreciate that you know the policies/guidelines, and I understand how sometimes in the heat of the moment we may forget about them. I'm sure you can find a cite for an "As of 2015..." sentence. --Tenebrae (talk) 18:22, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

@Tenebrae: I am sorry again,. I will try and find a source. --ACase0000 (talk) 18:25, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

MOS:DATERANGE

Hi there, is there a reason why you're going against MOS:DATERANGE in this edit? 2008–12 is correct, 2008–2012 is not (for example). If we cross a century, that's when we use two pairs of four digits, for instance 1986–2015. I don't want to revert the edit in case you made other constructive changes, but could I ask you to please bring the date ranges into conformity with the MOS unless there is a provocative reason not to? Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:29, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I am so sorry, I didn't know. Please forgive me. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:51, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

No problem. I know it's a hassle to change back, so I feel badly for that. :) Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:53, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Have a Good Day! --ACase0000 (talk) 16:57, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I have fix the page now. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 17:16, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for that! Most of the things related to style can be found at the Manual of Style. There are numerous manuals of style for various subjects, including for television, film, and so on. Have a good one! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:35, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Nathan Clarke (actor)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nathan Clarke (actor), ACase0000!

Wikipedia editor Samtar just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good work! (also, another fact to add to my HP knowledge ;) )

To reply, leave a comment on Samtar's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

The Center Line: Summer 2015

—MediaWiki message delivery (talk) delivered on behalf of Imzadi1979 05:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Rocky Fork State Park

Hello ACase0000,
You're weclome with the help with Rocky Fork State Park (Tennessee). I've been interested in that park, and I wanted to see an article too. You're request encouraged me to work on it.
The recent Greenville Sun article didn't clearly state which land was whose. The 9,800 acres is for the entire conservation project, in which both Tennessee State Parks and Cherokee National Forest are involved. The majority of the acquired land for this project will become a part of the National Forest. Only 2,036 of the 9,800 acres make up the new state park. Looking at multiple other new releases and maps make this clear.
–Sparkgap (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

@Sparkgap: I just wanted your opinion. I have did a little to the article. A little project I have been doing, is adding Infoboxes to TN state parks pages. I appreciate you creating the article. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 13:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Cool. :D I'm glad someone is looking at the TN State Parks. Several of them have needed attention.

–Sparkgap (talk) 11:35, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Image renaming

Hello ACase0000, can you help me rename this file File:NeilRWS,png.png? I've missnamed it, Thanks. Stevensonmachine 00:47, 13 September 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevensonmachine (talk • contribs)

@Stevensonmachine: You'd be best at asking an admin to help. Contact User:Cyphoidbomb he can help. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 01:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Thomas and Friends

I see the indefatigable IP editor has continued to add unsourced material to Thomas & Friends (series 19). I've now semi-protected the page to stop this. Since you seem to know something about the topic, I'd greatly appreciate it if you could review the changes made recently, to see if there's any of their stuff still left in the article. -- The Anome (talk) 11:09, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, @The Anome:! And I will take a look. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 15:21, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K-VA-T Food City, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BI-LO. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:36, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Re: I Didn't Do It

Per WP:OVERLINKING, a link should generally only be in an article once. If the name Candy Apple is linked in the info box, it should not be linked anywhere else it's used. "An overlinked article contains an excessive number of links, making it difficult to identify links likely to aid the reader's understanding significantly."

Then per WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, saying something along the lines of "This article also does it" is not a valid argument. How things are done on other articles doesn't set precedence over other articles, especially if those articles have it wrong. In a case like that, those other articles should be fixed as well when someone has the time.

If you have any questions, though, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 05:19, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Amaury: Wikipedia, is so different now. All these new policies..... Has it always been this way? --ACase0000 (talk) 05:26, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes. It's been that way since long before I even joined back in December 2008. They may seem dumb to many users, but they're what keep Wikipedia from deteriorating into nothing more than people arguing back and forth continuously and the like. As such, guidelines must be followed. Cheers! Amaury (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't know where you got that interpretation of the guideline from, Amaury, but that's not what I know. In general, in the various articles I've written and nominated at the higher assessment levels, that is not the rule. A link in an infobox can, and should, be repeated in the body of the article. In fact, we are explicitly allowed to even repeat a link from the lead to the body of the article, and even within the body where separated by large amounts of intervening text. Yes, we shouldn't link every usage of a term, but we do our readers a disservice if we make them search the entire article for the one and only wikilink when a few judicious repeats would help a lot.

So in short, you could see at least three links: infobox, lead text and body text for a term. You could see even more if the article is longer and it would make sense to repeat the link in each major section of the article. Imzadi 1979 → 05:56, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

I got it from this part of the overlinking article: "Generally, a link should appear only once in an article, but if helpful for readers, a link may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions, footnotes, hatnotes, and at the first occurrence after the lead." Although I do realize that generally doesn't mean always.

In any case, if it improves readability, then yeah, and I wouldn't question it at all. In this particular case, though, I think the article is quite small and the links to the actors can be found quite easily. Amaury (talk) 06:10, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Doeville and Doe Valley

These appear to be two separate places, so I've split them into two articles. Both have their own "unincorporated" sign on 67, with Pandora in between. These sources suggest they're different: [5] and [6]. Bms4880 (talk) 19:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

@Bms4880: No Problem. I did not know. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 00:59, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

Hello, ACase0000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thomas & Friends (series 19), you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
• instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: You aren't an administrator so you can't boss me around. PLEASE trust me. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Also I never said I was anyone high-up at HiT Entertainment. I just receive emails from staff and cast members. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

I am not attempting to boss you around. I am attempting to ensure the article follows our core policies. The conflict of interest policy notice is not something I wrote, it is Wikipedia's standard notice for apparent conflicts of interest.

I did not say you were anyone "high-up" anywhere. You did, however, say that you "have connections with" HiT Entertainment], thus the standard COI note.

You have to realize two things:

1) Wikipedia has policies (one of which is WP:V, which you are asking me to ignore). Without policies, the site would quickly devolve into a mess of vandalism, trolling, incorrect information, outright lies, grandstanding, etc.

2) I do not know who you or almost anyone else on the site is. Along with those attempting to build an encyclopedia, we have countless vandals, POV-pushers, well-intentioned but incompetent editors, mentally ill editors, biased contributors, etc. You saying that you are editing in good faith and have a source for unpublished information does not establish that you are editing in good faith or have inside information.

Our core content policy states: "In Wikipedia, verifiability means that anyone using the encyclopedia can check that the information comes from a reliable source. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors. Even if you're sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it....All material in Wikipedia mainspace...must be verifiable.... Any material that needs a source but does not have one may be removed."

Your addition is not verifiable. I have challenged it and have given you sufficient time to provide a published source. You do not have one. I am removing the information. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:38, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Please note: On Wikipedia, "vandalism" is a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of the project. A content dispute is not vandalism.

Please read WP:BRD. You Boldly added information to the article. I disagreed with your addition and Reverted the addition. At that point, our normal flow is to Discuss the issue before restoring the disputed edit. Instead, you have restored the information. The disputed content should not remain in the article until the dispute is resolved.

There are several ways we can resolve this issue. I am opening a discussion on the article's talk page to get things underway. Please observe WP:BRD and do not restore the information until the issue is resolved. Thank you. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:45, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Until I get told by and administrator, the information stays. Please, please Trust me. They are real. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:49, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

You seem to not understand how Wikipedia works. An administrator has additional tools at their disposal (to lock articles, delete articles, block vandals and such) but does not have additional say in disputes. We work by consensus. If ten editors !vote one way and one administrator disagrees, the consensus is in favor of the ten editors.

Your insistence that we keep the disputed, unsourced information in the article is backwards. That you feel your information is correct and that you should be simply trusted is indicative of not understanding verifiability.

Rather than continuing the edit war, I will go to the article's talk page and ping any admins who have previously edited the article, if no one has arrived yet.

Once the issue is resolved, I would like to suggest that you consider our "Adopt-a-user project. If you decide to go with it, an experienced editor will work with you to help you learn your way around a bit more and help you avoid some common missteps.

Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:04, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I know how Wikipedia works, I have been here several years. Something I worried about, if I am telling the truth about the episodes (which I am), And say someone else edits the page, then I can't undo the removal of the episodes without doing it by hand. Ugh. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

You can go to history, open the version of the page that has the disputed content, edit that page, select the text and copy-paste it to the current page. EZ-peasy. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I have no idea how to do that. But I guess it's worth a try. Also I can prove that Toad and the Whale and Wild Water Rescue are real. I have the DVDs. I have screenshots of the episode selection menu's, if that helps. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: September 2015

Volume 8, Issue S1 • September 2015 • About the Newsletter

Happy 10th Anniversary!

• • USRD through the years
• • A goal for success
• • From the first spinning cogs to controlling the power of the moon

• • Article assessment over time
• • How to measure a WikiProject's load
• • Conflict over article titles

• • Arbitration case closes
• • Collaboration
• • Our valued contributors

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 23:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring

Though I understand your frustration, you should not be restoring future content that is not directly sourced as you did here. As previously noted, we are in no hurry for this information. If we have to wait for the episodes to air, so be it. But continuing to submit the unsourced content is problematic and may result in sanctions, something that is easily preventable and would be unfortunate if it were to happen, given your positive contributions. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:16, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: One episode has a source. And Toad and the Whale and Wild Water Rescue are freaking DVD. I have them. --ACase0000 (talk) 19:27, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Well now that's a step in the right direction, because you can cite the DVD! Use {{Cite AV media}}. You will not, however, be able to add an episode # since we don't know in what order it will air, and I doubt any air dates would be on the DVD. You can also use the DVD episodes as the source for the director and writer as well along with a uniquely-written plot summary if you feel so inclined to write one. (We cannot copy any summary on the box, however, as I'm sure you know.) Reasonable? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:49, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I asked Summer if I could cite DVDs and she/he said no. Thomas episodes beginning with series 17 list the writer in the title Card. Thanks for you help. :D --ACase0000 (talk) 20:07, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Could you please add the DVD cite thing? --ACase0000 (talk) 20:15, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Can you point me to the DVD discussion? And are we talking about a commercially released DVD? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:17, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: On SummerPhDv2.0's talk page I told her/him that they are on DVD. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:22, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Her, FYI. I'll take a look. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:25, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: My Bad. Also I think the Dvd is commercially released. It is sold only at Walmart and Sam's Club. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I left you a message on your talk page. Please respond. :-) :-) :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 18:45, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas & Friends (series 19), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Channel 5. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

State route/state park photos

Hey, thanks for the kind words on my talk page! You mentioned that you have created or improved several of the state park pages, and I noticed that you do a lot of work on the state routes as well. Is there anything in either of those categories that could use a photo? I've got tons of photographs from Middle and southern East Tennessee that I could upload (that's where I got the Tims Ford picture, for instance). If it's in southern Middle TN and I don't have a photo of it, I can get one fairly easily. WikiProject Tennessee seems dead so I thought you might have easier access to this information than I would. Thanks, Chris (talk) 21:04, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

@Geobeedude: There are several state route articles could use a photo, namely Tennessee State Route 156 and Tennessee State Route 110, that's really the only highways in that area I have created in that area.--ACase0000 (talk) 01:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Tennessee I-26 Welcome Center

Question, is there a reason we are listing a welcome center in the exit list in Interstate 26? I ask this because this is most uncommon. --WashuOtaku (talk) 04:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

@Washuotaku: It was originally supposed to be exit 5, however the state changed it. And someone changed the exit on the exit list to the way it s now. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

I just made some changes to the I-26/US 23 exit list; I left the welcome center line item there, but I strongly feel it should be removed. --WashuOtaku (talk) 05:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

@Washuotaku: Do so. I won't stop you. You could ask the road project about. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Railway engines (Thomas & Friends). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. That you are having difficulties providing sources does not invalidate WP:V. Given the extensive vandalism these pages have been subject to, future events/material must cite reliable source. If you are having technological difficulties of some kind, numerous other editors (myself included) are willing to work with you to help resolve the issue. Thanks. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:40, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Hit Entertainment said all characters that were introduced/reintroduced in Sodor's Legend of the Lost Treasure would appear in Season 20. Additionally Joe Mills confirmed his characters would appear. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

If you wish to add this information, you will need to include a cite to a reliable source. Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: The problem is, is that the tweets where removed. :'( --ACase0000 (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

That leaves three options:

(1) Perhaps Twitter is on good terms with the Wayback Machine?

(2) Find another source.

(3) Wait for the release of the episodes in question. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Thanks for your help. Can we please at least say that Stephen will appear in Season 19. You can go on the official Thomas & Friends YouTube channel and watch the video called "Start Your Engines!. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

By citing the official video, you can say that a character is in that episode and, to the extent the source confirms it, that the episode is scheduled to air as part of whatever season. - SummerPhD^v2.0 17:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: The video is not an episode. But an official preview of a season 19 DVD ("Start Your Engines!"). If you watch it, Stephen is yellow engine. :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Hello? --ACase0000 (talk) 02:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. I didn't think you were expecting an answer. The official channel is certainly a reliable source for non-trivial basic information about the show. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Thank you so so much. :-D --ACase0000 (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Usual

Hi dear friend!

Question: In the text: "The Macro Video was a normal and average cinema 10 years ago and It is a 5-floor building cinema now. "The Macro Video used to be a usual cinema but it's got many halls." Does the adjective 'usual' imply suitable usage? Alborzagros (talk) 13:09, 15 November 2015 (U

@Alborzagros: Umm? Do i know you? --ACase0000 (talk) 13:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

hi, you don't know me. this is a grammatical question that you may know the answer as a native English speaker. Alborzagros (talk) 13:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

@Alborzagros: Oh, I'm sorry. :-).

I think 'usual' works. As "usual" means "customary" and "typically occurring" in English. I hope that helps. Feel free to ask me more questions. :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 13:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a million my friend. IT HELPS ME VERY MUCH. BYE Alborzagros (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Mansions

Thank you. I am very interested in the Antebellum South. I try to create referenced articles about plantations, planters, etc. Are you able to take pictures in Tennessee? For example, both Fairmont (Columbia, Tennessee) and Skipwith Hall could do with a picture.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Zigzig20s: You are very welcome. I do live in east Tennessee. Particularly the Greeneville area. So that would be the only places I could take pictures. I do have pictures of several historic structures in Greene County. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Would you be able to take pictures of the main buildings on the Carson–Newman University campus at some point? I'm working on William Allen Montgomery right now.Zigzig20s (talk) 08:30, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

@Zigzig20s: Possibly. :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 17:59, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

nrhp infoboxes

You have made a few edits that I've come across, like this one, where you set nrhp_type = National Register of Historic Places. Please only use an entry from the valid list, which is described here, look under Designations and then click show accepted values. For the most common type of entry, just a normal NRHP listing, leave the nrhp_type blank. I think you might have been trying to get the "U.S. National Register of Historic Places" banner to display, which your change does, but only by accident. The real problem is that the banner doesn't display if the reference number field is left blank. Fell Feel free to add the missing reference number. Generic1139 (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Generic1139: I thought did it the correct way, I am sorry. How do you get the banner thing to appear? Because it wasn't appearing.. --ACase0000 (talk) 21:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

The normal case for an NRHP infobox is that either a refnum or a partof_refnum be set. Not doing so is an error, and the article appears in a cleanup category like Category:NRHP infobox needing cleanup. In your case, the article you were editing didn't have a refnum, so that banner was missing. When you added an nrhp_type that isn't permitted, the banner appeared. This is a bug in the infobox, I think, and I'll report that. It should have said "invalid designation" in the banner. When the refnum is added, the banner will appear. If nrhp_type is set the way you had it, it appears twice once the refnum is added.

The short answer to your question is that to make the banner appear, you need to add the refnum, just leave the nrhp_type blank. Someone usually comes along and adds the reference number to articles in the cleanup category, that's what I was doing today. Generic1139 (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

@Generic1139: Ah, Thank you! :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

The Center Line: November 2015

Volume 8, Issue 4 • November 2015 • About the Newsletter

Departments

• • Assessment roundup
• • Portal selected articles and pictures
• • KML Corner

Features

• • Constructing a road junction list
• • WikiConference USA 2015
• • The Junction template and you
• • Harnessing map archives

State and national updates

• • State updates
• • In other project news...

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk) on 22:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Historic Districts

Hello, Thanks for the tip re. Bulls Gap. Yes, I will plan on working on it this month, and take photos at the end of December. I live in Oklahoma and work on Wiki pages for TN during Christmas vacation. I see there is a good and complete application form, so lots of data to work with. Best, Steven C. Price 19:35, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

@Steven C. Price: Thank you! Bulls Gap holds a special place in my heart. :-) --ACase0000 (talk) 23:50, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Just wanted to let you know I created a Bulls Gap Historic District Page. There are more buildings I will be adding very soon, but wanted to let you know. Best, SteveSteven C. Price 20:32, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! --ACase0000 (talk) 04:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Howdy. I see you've added to the page! Since you are much more familiar with making references than I am, I was wondering if you could cite reference #2 on each of the paragraphs, as when I do it just makes a long list of consecutive #'s 3,4,5 etc. If you could do the same in my table that would be great too. Or, if you could tell me how to make this type of reference I'd be happy to, of course. Also, I understand Rogersville is a fine Historic District and I note that the Wiki page could use some photographs of buildings, in my opinion. So, when I'm visiting inlaws next August I plan on visiting Rogersville and taking a few photos. Thanks, Steven C. Price 17:06, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

@Steven C. Price: I'm not really that familar with doing those tables either, but I could try. And Yes, Rogersville, has a great one too. --ACase0000 (talk) 22:37, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Howdy, figured it out so no troubles with the references. Think I'm done with Bulls Gap! Best, Steven C. Price 15:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

"Confirmed in ref"

What ref? - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:47, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: The listed by (Nigel Pilkington (UK; TBA) --ACase0000 (talk) 06:26, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

That is not clear. You needed to add the cite. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Miss @SummerPhDv2.0:. Also thank you for fixing it.  :-D --ACase0000 (talk) 20:24, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Worth adding the horses to WPTN?

Would it be worth adding the articles about the individual horses (who were all born or made history in Tennessee) to the project? They are:

• Black Allan (horse)
• Roan Allen
• Wilson's Allen
• Midnight Sun (horse)
• Strolling Jim
• Merry Go Boy
• I Am Jose

I would just add them but I'm worried about tagging indiscriminately. Thanks. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 00:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

@White Arabian Filly: I am not sure myself. :-( --ACase0000 (talk) 05:12, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks anyway, I may post at the project talk page and ask. White Arabian Filly (Neigh) 15:45, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

January 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 19). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. SummerPhD^v2.0 06:47, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: My god. Buzz off. I did not do anything wrong. --ACase0000 (talk) 07:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Frankly, you did. Our style guide specifies how we handle national varieties of English. Per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#National_varieties_of_English, the choice of which variety to use is based on whether the topic has ties to a particular country. In this case, that is clearly England.

More importantly, you are edit warring:

TARDIS2468 corrected the article.

You reverted. Neither one of you gave an explanatory edit summary, which might have been helpful.

Cyphoidbomb (an administrator, BTW) reverted you, explaining that you should have explained why you were reverting and that we use DMY order in articles with ties to England.

You reverted, saying "If they can't read the dates the way they are now. Then they shouldn't be reading anyway", which, of course, could be said to you with equal validity.

I reverted you, directing you to WP:ENGVAR, which you apparently did not read, did not understand or chose to ignore, and gave you the warning above.

You reverted me, stating, "It was perfectly fine the way it was. I see nothing wrong with it being listed this way." If you see "nothing wrong" with it one way and three other experienced editors disagree, you are editing against consensus.

You have several choices at this point:

• Discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Maybe you're right and we are all wrong. Give it a go: Discussion is always a good choice.
• Read the guideline. Perhaps there is something more you can learn about Wikipedia and national varieties of English. Who knows, on 1 January 2017 you might be buying a litre of petrol whilst transporting colourful artefacts in the boot of your auto.
• Decide you're being picked on, walk away and learn nothing.
• Decide you are right, revert it again and find yourself blocked for edit warring (see the warning, below).

Cheers. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:44, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Thomas & Friends (series 19) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

ACase, your stonewalling of the date format change is really obnoxious. Explanations like If they can't read the dates the way they are now. Then they shouldn't be reading anyway[7] are simply ridiculous. You're really starting to raise questions in my mind about whether or not you have the skill and maturity to edit in this collaborative environment. The entirety of this latest issue may have been avoided had you included a coherent rationale for removing the DMY date formatting, but I don't think you have one other than that you personally prefer US date formatting. That's not a suitable reason to stonewall change. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:56, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: There you go targeting someone. Like you got on to me for. I am very mature and I have lots of skill. BLOCK ME IF YOU WANT! I don't really care, your gonna do it anyway. Because you think: I don't "Have the skill and maturity to edit". Now that is enough to make someone upset. --ACase0000 (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Reading comp: I said that you are "starting to raise questions in my mind about whether or not you have the skill and maturity to edit in this collaborative environment", not that you don't. When you do something bizarre like stonewall a legitimate date format change with the insufficient explanation you provided above, or the follow-up emotional (i.e. non-rational) argument It was perfectly fine the way it was. I see nothing wrong with it being listed this way.[8] your actions raises those questions. We should be editing per community preferences, not per our personal preferences. I have no vested interest in blocking you or having you blocked, and that outcome is entirely up to you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:04, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I'd say i am not the only person that disagree's with the dates. And it was fine the way it was. It in all honesty it doesn't really matter to readers how the dates are listed.

I am sorry you think badly of me. :( --ACase0000 (talk) 19:18, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Kettle logic. You're simultaneously saying "I, and other people, disagree with the date formatting" and "the date formatting doesn't matter". Those two positions contradict each other. If it doesn't matter, then you'd have no legitimate reason to revert the change. And anyway, the community cared enough to write WP:ENGVAR. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb:/@SummerPhDv2.0: Please forgive me! I promise, i will not mess with your dates, nor will I cause you trouble. Have a great New Years, Whilst I go get some tea and petrol for my auto. ;) --ACase0000 (talk) 19:42, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 20). Restoring unsourced material without explanation is neither helpful nor acceptable. SummerPhD^v2.0 13:56, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Go away and shut up. Joseph May is Thomas's US voice for 10 years. --ACase0000 (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

ACase0000, this is the last time I'm going to remind you to add references, and the last time I'm going to remind you to please use a civil tongue. If you were to properly explain your edits using clear edit summaries, unlike the useless emoticon you added here, you might find that your editing experience goes much smoother. Nobody has told you to shut up, so telling others to shut up is inappropriate. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I am sorry. But there are plenty of Thomas related pages that are vandalized daly and I am trying be good and edit correct things and you think otherwise. --ACase0000 (talk) 03:41, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

The fact that there are other disruptions out there doesn't give you a license to be disruptive. I've given you a three-step plan to get other editors off your case: add references, be civil, use clear edit summaries. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:08, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Yes, Sir! :D --ACase0000 (talk) 21:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced additions

You have been repeatedly asked to stop adding unsourced material to articles.

You have repeatedly promised that you have absolutely, positively, most definitely, for sure, this time for real, I'm not kidding, honest, really, I swear learned your lesson and would never ever ever do it again.

Once again, you seem to have forgotten or ignored all of this, despite numerous reminders.[9][10][11][12][13]

You've ironically been fighting an issue with another editor over whether one of the unsourced future characters is from Canada or North America, similar to your earlier issue with an editor who you had been going back and forth with over whether a voice actor's unsourced roles included some of the children or not. Without citing sources, it's two editors saying "I'm right, you're wrong" with no end in sight. Sourcing the information ends the edit war.

Frankly, I give up. I'll leave it to Cyphoidbomb's judgement as to whether or not your obvious enthusiasm for the project can be salvaged through adoption/0RR/topic ban/something else. if we're irredeemably in CIR territory or if I need to simply walk away from this. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:15, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I am sorry. I was doing what I though to be the right thing. ei, the voices. Those IP users are the evil, they want nothing more than to make our lives miserable. You could add some sources too you know Summer, (to help out). Go ahead and block me if it makes you happy. But whatever you people do here, please don't take my love for Thomas away. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:34, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Sorry, I really am. I guess I deserve this. --ACase0000 ([User talk:ACase0000#top|talk]]) 20:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Will you forgive me, please? When I am unblocked I promise I will add sources and only revert vandalism. Is that okay? --ACase0000 (talk) 20:08, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: When will I be unblocked? --ACase0000 (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ACase0000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Users are too pushy. I never really did anything to be blocked or maybe I did. But still I should be unblocked now I am very sorry and I won't act the way I did again. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

All those warnings and discussions, and you still don't know if you really did anything to be blocked? And it's the fault of others for being too pushy? If you don't start showing that you understand the problem and demonstrating that you will change your behavior, you should expect future blocks to be longer. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Here's what this sounds like to me: "Everyone else is at fault. I didn't do anything wrong. Maybe I did something wrong. I should be unblocked because I'm sorry for what I didn't or maybe did do, and in the future I won't do what I didn't do or maybe did do." This doesn't really showcase strong rational thinking. Switching gears, do you have any idea what was problematic about this edit you made? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:23, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I shouldn't have said that. I admit that I did wrong and that I derserve to be blocked. About the edit, the engines basis? --ACase0000 (talk) 03:10, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Why is my IP address still blocked? --ACase0000 (talk) 03:14, 7 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject Thomas--Shining Time Station

I have not assessed Shining Time Station because I am not sure if it should be C-class, start-class, or B-class. You have more experience, so do you want to assess it? --Peter Sam Fan | chat? 12:58, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

@Peter SamFan: I think it should be be a B-class. But that is just my thinking, though. --ACase0000 (talk) 13:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Okay. Peter Sam Fan | chat? 13:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Railway engines (Thomas & Friends) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 13:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thomas & Friends (series 20)

The article Thomas & Friends (series 20) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:DEL7 - entirely unsourced, can't find good RS about renewal or plans for future season

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 21:04, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

@EvergreenFir: Would a cast members mention of the series be proof? --ACase0000 (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

I've added a source please check it over to make sure it's okay. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:36, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Works for me. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 03:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomas & Friends (series 19), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jonathan Forbes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends: The Great Race. Do not add material without citing a source, especially when you were warned that there didn't seem to be sufficient sources to start an article. Do not remove sourced information, especially when it comes from the only source you have provided for the article.

You have been warned repeatedly. You have been blocked previously. Further blocks, if needed, will be longer. SummerPhD^v2.0 17:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Excuse me? What did I do? I didn't do anything wrong. Please tell me. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:31, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You made these edits, adding unsourced material and removing sourced material. This is pretty straightforward: When there is only one source in an article, material that is not in that source is unsourced. Material that is in that source is uncontested. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Oh, right! I am sorry. Also I left you message on your talk page about where to find the voice actors confirmed for the film. --ACase0000 (talk) 04:58, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Sources go in articles: WP:CITE. - SummerPhD^v2.0 11:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I know! I am not stupid. But you can't cite YouTube videos as sources. I already tried. --ACase0000 (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

In this edit you have added Keenan as executive producer for the film in question. The source you cited states only that he was "elevated to SVP of content development and production". This does not confirm that he is credited as executive producer.

You also listed HiT as one of the studios. The article mentions HiT twice; both times with Playground Productions and American Girl who you did not include. The article states the three "are all coming together as Mattel Creations". The article is not clear whether this is strictly for the toy line, the film or both.

The source clearly cites Tina Desai as Ashima, which you partially added. I am removing the other claims, moving the cites to clarify what is cited where and asking you to be more careful. - SummerPhD^v2.0 22:03, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: The source also clearly states that Arc Productions is animating the film. --ACase0000 (talk) 22:23, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You are correct in saying that YouTube videos cannot be cited as sources. You appear to miss the point that they cannot be used as sources either. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:32, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury: I get that. I would just like to know why they can't be used. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Because they can be altered at will by any casual user, which means that data contained therein cannot be guaranteed as to its accuracy.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@Anthony Bradbury: That makes sense. --ACase0000 (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

And, because we can't use potential copyright violations as references. If the YouTube video comes from a verified official account, I don't see a problem with including it as a reference any more than if it were on their official website. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:36, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Let's make this really simple: Do not add anything to any article without citing a reliable source that directly supports everything you are adding. You've been warned repeatedly. You have promised repeatedly that this time you really absolutely mean it for certain. Then, you seem to forget.[14] I don't care whether you think what you added is obvious. I don't care if it is obvious. Add a cite to a reliable source after everything you add to every article every single time.

You have been repeatedly asked to use edit summaries. Occasionally you do. Use edit summaries every single time. Always. Be clear about what you did, so that other editors can assess it quickly.

If, at any time, you are not absolutely certain that material you are adding is directly stated by the source you are citing or that the source is reliable, ask for help before making the change. - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:49, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: He has narrated both for the past 4 years and he is narrating both for this film too. No need to be so pushy on citing sources, either. Also it's hard to find sources. --ACase0000 (talk) 21:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Also Thank you for helping out and I will listen to you, Summer. --ACase0000 (talk) 22:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, you feel certain that he will narrate every version of every episode and "film" from now until the end of time. I understand that. However, this is an article in Wikipedia on an unreleased film. Information must be verifiable. People reading the article cannot tell if the information they are reading was added by you, one of the numerous vandals, or if the whole article was delivered on stone tablets directly from God. By now, you should be getting the message. These are kids' shows. Kids are editing the articles. Some really, really want to add something, whether they have anything to add or not. Some are obsessed with trains and are certain that they know everything there is to know about trains, including this series and all the toys associated with it. Sometimes they are right. Sometimes they are wrong. The Internet is an echo chamber. One of those kids mentions a pseudo-fact in a blog post or adds to a wiki somewhere and it soon is accepted as a concrete fact. It does not, however, belong here unless it is verifiable.

Maybe you are right about the narrator. Time and reliable sources will tell. Your assumption does not belong in the article.

CITE SOURCES FOR EVERYTHING YOU ADD. EVERYTHING. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I understand. I will listen to you. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 01:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Do not remove content without explaining why in an edit summary.[15] Use edit summaries. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:28, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I removed it with a summary. --ACase0000 (talk) 03:03, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

"Use edit summaries every single time. Always." - Me, 9 April 2016

"I will listen to you, Summer." - You, 9 April 20016

[16] - You, one of three edits without an edit summary, 11 April 2016

"CITE SOURCES FOR EVERYTHING YOU ADD. EVERYTHING." - Me, 10 April 2016

"I understand. I will listen to you. :)" - You, 10 April 2016

[17] - You, adding material without citing a reliable source, 11 April 2016.

Whatever you say in response, I will believe that you mean it, but will be unable to follow through. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:40, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Sorry, Summer. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:50, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

And yet [18]. The source mentions ONE role and ZERO countries. The edit mentions TWO roles and TWO countries. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:23, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: He voices James, He was seen in the trailer. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:49, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

CITE SOURCES FOR EVERYTHING YOU ADD. EVERYTHING. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I get it, no need to post in caps. I'd cite a source but youtube videos can't be used here. So when the film is released and no sources state who voices who are we still going be posting about it here and saying "CITE SOURCES"?

Tennessee State Route 136

Since you create articles for state highways, you may want to create one for 136 when you get a chance. I'll be adding links for it, and already have a category for it on Commons. BrineStans (talk) 15:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

I've been planning to create an article on 136 for a while now. Thanks for the the reminder! --ACase0000 (talk) 16:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

@BrineStans: Done! :) --ACase0000 (talk) 20:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Awesome. I'll add to it tomorrow, and see if I can find some sources. BrineStans (talk) 21:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

@BrineStans: Thanks! Should something be noted about the narrow one lane bridge/dam in Standing Stone State Park? --ACase0000 (talk) 02:35, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tennessee State Route 136, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rock Island State Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Martha Sundquist State Forest) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Martha Sundquist State Forest, ACase0000!

Wikipedia editor NearEMPTiness just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This is a good start, although it is still a bit too short to be really meaningful. I propose to convert the bare web links in the references into hyperlinks.

To reply, leave a comment on NearEMPTiness's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Sofia the First characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamond White. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Re. Nathan Clarke and Spotlight

Replied on my talkpage with a little information about myself. Apologies for the late response, my time spent here is sporadic. Orphan Wiki 11:16, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends: The Great Race

As you may have noticed, this article continues to receive unsourced information. When adding information or restoring information, add inline citations. Knowing where you heard it is not citing sources. Mentioning in an edit summary that somewhere in the article there is a source is not citing a source. In fact, the only thing that is citing sources is citing sources. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:18, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Those actors are already sourced in the infbox. Also are you going to continue with this unsourced stuff when the movie is released and everyone has seen it? --ACase0000 (talk) 16:44, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Because of the on-going unsourced additions (roles, voice actors, countries, etc.), yes, I am asking for cites in both the info box and the cast list.

Once it is widely released, the film itself is considered an unstated source for basic, non-controversial information such as cast list, etc.

After that, anything debatable (box office, critical response, etc.) will still require sources. Kids' articles simply generate too much unsourced guesswork/dreaming to go without it.

Incidentally, the "unsourced stuff" is call "verifiability". It's one of the Five pillars that supports this entire project. It's kind of a big deal. - SummerPhD^v2.0 18:46, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Alright. I have a suggestion for you: Request the article be protected so only autoconfirmed users can edit it. That would be so much better for you than constantly undoing edits. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

IMO, the unsourced additions are infrequent enough that page protection is not warranted. - SummerPhD^v2.0 21:24, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Alright. Also the link to Flying Scotsman should be re-added. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:03, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

You have not made an argument for restoring the link, you have simply stated it should be restored. Not very compelling. The link from "Flaying Scotsman" to LNER Class A3 4472 Flying Scotsman begs the obvious question: Why? Yes, there is an engine which is often referred to by the name of the service it ran. You seem to have decided the new fictional engine will be this real world engine, not either of these real world engines or any others or, perhaps, an entirely fictional engine.

Here is the Marklin Train Red Diesel 4 Axel #5772. It must be "Axel". They seem to have taken some liberties with WP/P class 7200 "Ashima" to come up with "Ashima".

If you have reliable sources that say "Flying Dutchman" in the film is the LNER Class A3 4472 Flying Scotsman, we can add it. If not, it is not verifiable and does not belong on Wikipedia. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:52, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: This says it is the real engine: 1 --ACase0000 (talk) 03:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

It looks like a reliable source to me. Cite it and you're set. - SummerPhD^v2.0 12:23, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holladay, Tennessee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Decatur County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Source conflict

With this edit you have created a problem. Sources in articles are meant to verify the information they are cited for. When a source conflicts with the text, you are creating an unstable situation: Any editor running across a such a situation can be expected to change the text to match the source.

You will need to find a way to reword the section so that the text is supported by the source, without conflicting with the film.On possible approach would be to attribute the claim: Rather than saying there are four female characters introduced, say that it was announced that there would be four.

However you choose to address it, the current situation cannot stand. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:28, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: It's not my fault those news organisations made the mistake. But the character Rajiv was mistaken for being female. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:15, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

It does not matter who made the mistake in the source. You cannot have information followed by a cite that says something different. - SummerPhD^v2.0 14:29, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Remove the source. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:46, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

That's "throwing the baby out with the bath water". Removing the source will leave a good bit of unsourced material: "In an effort to expand the preschool franchise beyond its current lineup of mostly male, British -- and apparently white -- characters..." This material cannot be sourced to the film itself and speaks to the reasons the new characters were created: evolving the brand, reaching for new kids' markets, etc. - SummerPhD^v2.0 20:18, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: K. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Railway engines (Thomas & Friends), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rufus Jones. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! SummerPhD^v2.0 14:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: K.--ACase0000 (talk) 15:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

So, the 12th reminder will finally do the trick? - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Don't you have better things to do than bother me? --ACase0000 (talk) 17:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

You are editing articles that are on my watchlist. When you don't use edit summaries, it takes longer to review your edits. Please use edit summaries. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: There plenty of users who don't use summaries. Go pester them. --ACase0000 (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

You are editing articles that are on my watchlist. When you don't use edit summaries, it takes longer to review your edits. Please use edit summaries. - SummerPhD^v2.0 13:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

ACase0000, your response is meaningless. You wouldn't be pestered about using edit summaries if you were consistently using edit summaries. I use edit summaries in 99.7% of my 76,000 edits. Poke through my contribution history if you care to. This is a community editing project, and edit summaries are the most rudimentary way we communicate with other editors, and how we let them know that our edits were sound and well thought out. Further, arguing that because someone else does something insufficiently, that you should be at liberty to do something insufficiently, is not a dignified response. "He's a crappy mechanic, so I should be a crappy mechanic." You are always at liberty to hold yourself to a high standard. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I am sorry. @Cyphoidbomb: Sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. [19] SummerPhD^v2.0 00:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Please leave me alone. Thank you. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

The reasons for the changes you make are not always immediately clear. On occasion, your edits have been incorrect. To sort out whether or not your edits are correct, I sometimes need an edit summary to clarify. You have repeatedly promised to use edit summaries, but have not begun to do so.

As I am unable to determine why some of your edits have been made, without edit summaries I will be forced to revert them. When I do so, you will receive escalating warnings relevant to the apparent nature of the change. Otherwise, you may find it easier to begin using edit summaries. (Heck, there is an option to have Wikipedia request a summary whenever you try to save an edit without one.) Your choice. - SummerPhD^v2.0 12:02, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: If you revert an edit that is correct you will be given warnings too. I'm sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:16, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Feel free. Relise, however, that it is your responsibility to ensure that you changes and the reasons for making them are clear. Edit summaries make that task much easier. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

ACase, who described Philip as having a "supporting-lead" role? I'm also not familiar with this terminology, so maybe you can clarify it with references? I don't see the term "supporting-lead" at thehollywoodreporter.com (with hyphen or without) and I only see four uses at variety.com, which seemingly goes back to 1936. One of the uses is in the context of a quotation, not the reporter's words, and the other three usages seem like they might be erroneously used, considering we only see them three times in 80 years. So can you clarify this, please? My understanding is that most TV and film projects have lead and supporting actors/roles and supporting actors. What's a lead-supporting actor? Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I thought there was a such thing as "supporting-lead." I am sorry. I guess Philip was more of a co-lead character.--ACase0000 (talk) 03:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

I don't know what distinction you're making mentally between lead characters and co-lead characters. There can be multiple lead characters in a work. I'd probably consider all four Ninja Turtles lead characters, where April and Splinter and Shredder might be supporting characters. I don't know who in that group would qualify as a "co-lead" because I don't know what that means either. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: He's just a lead character. Sorry for any confusion. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2016 (UTC)

Edit war warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Railway engines (Thomas & Friends). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Hammersoft (talk) 01:20, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@Hammersoft: I reworded the statement that was causing the problems. Sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Final warning for disruptive editing

ACase, this pattern of ignoring established community guidelines needs to stop. My finger hovered over the BLOCK button for a few minutes as I contemplated what to do with you. I feel that you're needlessly going out of your way to be a nuisance, particularly to SummerPhDv2.0 who is spending inordinate amounts of time supervising your often-highly-questionable decisions, like this edit, where you reverted Summer after she provided a very clear explanation for what was wrong with the content. "No it is not redundant", you said, erroneously. The fact that you realized you were wrong is probably the only reason why you didn't get slapped with sanctions, but the bottom line is that your editing style is extraordinarily disruptive, and you're missing the community aspect of community editing. If you have any trouble in the next few weeks with adding unsourced content or edit warring or any of the things that you've previously been warned about, I will suspend your editing privileges to prevent disruption to the encyclopedia. It's not something that I want to do, but you have been given ample opportunities to get comfortable with sourcing, using edit summaries, understanding why personal labels like "supporting-lead", don't belong in articles, etc. Please use better judgment in the upcoming weeks and beyond, please. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I am sorry. I will do my best to please you. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:27, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

It's not about pleasing me, dude, it's about doing what the community wants. If your behavior at school or in public is disruptive there are consequences to that. Same here. At some point this behavior becomes indistinguishable from trolling. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:42, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I understand. Sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 05:46, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 30

Here's another fairly long state highway lacking an article, if you get a chance. BrineStans (talk) 21:48, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

@BrineStans: I've been meaning to create an article on. I'll do it soon. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016 2

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Thomas & Friends: The Great Race. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please see WP:KIDSTVDATES. SummerPhD^v2.0 16:19, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Re: [20] - You have been asked numerous times not to submit unsourced content, yet you continue to do it. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: This is so unfair. I was going to add it. Please Unblock me at once! --ACase0000 (talk) 16:47, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb:/@SummerPhDv2.0: Search for Thomas & Friends: The Great Race and can you please add the link for the date. I really am sorry. I was going to add the source, I promise, I had to save the edit because something came up. Please unblock me. --ACase0000 (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

It's not unfair. You have systematically ignored rational and reasonable attempts to encourage you to add sources. You are free to file an unblock request and another admin can take a look at your situation. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: I didn't ignore the attempts, I added sources and I was going to add one on the edit I made on the Thomas & Friends: The Great Race article, but you had to block me, the minute I saved the edit I was trying to edit the page again to add the source. But it's like you are targeting me for some reason. Can you please add the source for USA date for Thomas & Friends:The Great Race? Thank you. :) --ACase0000 (talk) 00:02, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

You made the edit at 12:08, June 24, 2016.[21] You were blocked at 12:42, June 24, 2016, over half an hour later.[Special:Log/block&page=User%3AACase0000] - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:45, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I'm a slow typer......--ACase0000 (talk) 03:18, 25 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Railway engines (Thomas & Friends). SummerPhD^v2.0 01:15, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Stop it! WHY CAN IT NOT BE ADDED? You added CN to all the others! --ACase0000 (talk) 07:04, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

1) You have been repeatedly asked to use descriptive edit summaries. Adding unsourced information is not "Fixes".[22]

2) You have been repeatedly warned and blocked for adding unsourced information. That you marked the claim "cite needed" makes it clear that you know it needs a source, but you did not add one. If you found the information in a reliable source, cite the source when you add it. If you did not find the information in a reliable source, DO NOT ADD THE INFORMATION.

3) All of the items I marked as needing sources will be removed in the near future.

Any time you are about to add anything to an article, ask yourself: Did I add a reliable source? If not, do not add the information or you will be blocked from editing. (Blocks are progressive: Each block is longer than the last one.) Any time you make an edit to an article, ask yourself: Have I included an edit summary that explains why I am making this change? If not, do not make the change. - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:10, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Thomas & Friends (series 20)

Before restoring the redirect, I removed all of the unsourced material and tagged the remaining problems. This is all that was left.

The DVD link you found does not say anything about series 20. It does not say there are five episodes on it. All that it does say is that there are Christmas themed episodes and the disc comes out in October 2016. This seems unlikely for a series that supposedly will run in 2017. Are they releasing December 2017 episodes on DVD 14 months before they air or is series 20 starting in December 2016? More likely is that these episodes are part of series 19, will be stand alone episodes or will be DVD only.

Series 20 running in 2017 was unsourced.

The role of the narrator was unsourced.

The country breakdown was unsourced.

There are zero independent sources in the article.

I would suggest that applying criteria for upcoming movies, found at WP:NFILM, would be a reasonable approach/ In short, future animated films are generally not notable until independent reliable sources confirm that the production is out of the pre-production phase (i.e., all final voicework is recorded and final rendering of animation is underway. Even then, we need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources, per WP:GNG. Voice actors listing the series in their work are primary, not independent sources. A listing at Amazon, IMDb, etc. confirms that the producers submitted info to that site, meaning they too are primary sources.

I get that you really want this future series to have an article, it is, however, clearly too soon. - SummerPhD^v2.0 23:32, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhdV2.0: Ugh. That DVD is series 20. Also the count the stories in the Amazon link. You will see that there 5 episodes.--ACase0000 (talk) 01:54, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, "Whine, whine, whine."

I see that you believe it is series 20. There is no indication in the source that it is series 20. Your previous edits to the article stated series 20 airs in 2017. These episodes are clearly Christmas stories. Is your 2017 wrong or are the episodes coming out on DVD 14 months before they air (and before the rest of the series) or is series 20 starting in December 2017? There is clearly guesswork involved here.

I see that you believe there are five stories in the Amazon link. The text under "Editorial Reviews" might be a listing of stories, but it is not at all clear that it is five stories and five episodes.

Again: These are all primary sources so far. We have, at best, a few tiny bits of information and some guesses based on one of those sources. That simply is not enough to build an encyclopedia article on. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Fine. Sorry. Plus I don't remember ever stating that series 20 would air in 2017. --ACase0000 (talk) 06:36, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

You originally created the article saying it would air in 2016.[23] There is no source for that. Your later restorations said 2017.[24][25] There's no source for that either.

Long story short, there is no future production that is immune to cancellation and it is extraordinarily rare for a future series to have sufficient coverage in independent reliable sources to be notable. - SummerPhD^v2.0 15:33, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: If you look at the pages history you will see that I AM NOT the person who originally said 2017. It was a user called "Googleguy". So before you blame someone make sure you know all the facts. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Cool it. You originally said 2016. That was unsourced and should never have been there.

After the page had been changed to a redirect, you restored it, with the date of 2017. Per WP:V, one of our core policies, "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material"; that would be you.

The page was again changed to a redirect, you restored it again, with the date of 2017.

Whatever. It's a minor point. The major point is this: When adding (or restoring) material to an article, please cite reliable sources for the material you are adding. When more than one experienced editor is telling you something, it would be a good idea to pay attention.

I would strongly recommend leaving that page as a redirect until such time as someone else creates an article there citing independent reliable sources. After that, I would strongly suggest you cite reliable sources for any changes you make and use descriptive edit summaries. If at any point and for any reason you are not 100% sure of your edit, source and summary, please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:50, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Luke (Thomas & Friends).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luke (Thomas & Friends).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Redrose64 (talk) 20:26, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alfie (Thomas & Friends).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alfie (Thomas & Friends).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Oliver the Excavator (Thomas & Friends).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oliver the Excavator (Thomas & Friends).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas & Friends (series 20). SummerPhD^v2.0 15:42, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: I'm sorry. I found a source. I'm adding it. Can you fix it to all the episodes? Thanks and Sorry. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:28, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

No, I cannot. If you can't add the sources, you can't add the material. I will remove the unsourced additions tomorrow. - SummerPhD^v2.0 01:49, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv2.0: Fine. I'll do it. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:14, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, ACase0000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Unsourced material in BLPs

I see from your talk page that you have been asked to include the required sources to articles when adding information. Could you please confirm where you obtained this birth date for John Hasler? Thank you, --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Oh. I forgot. Sorry about that. It's on IMDB. --ACase0000 (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

IMDb is not a reliable source for biographical info. Please see WP:CITINGIMDB. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

@SummerPhDv.0: Oh. Sorry for any trouble. --ACase0000 (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, as SummerPhDv.o notes above, IMDB does not meet reliable sourcing criteria; this holds especially true for biographical data. The website includes user-generated content and is rife with errors. We definitely don't want to be repeating those errors here. You can read more about the consensus regarding the use of IMDB here, here and here. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:04, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hasler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Casualty. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017

Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

Departments

• • Assessment roundup
• • Portal selected articles and pictures

Features

• • Commons and Wikidata revamp
• • Route logs for junction lists
• • Finding friends at the DOT
• • This space for rent

State and national updates

• • State updates
• • In other project news...

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ACase0000. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 375

I appreciate your feedback, however I’ve lived in Grainger County, Tennessee all my life and I’ve never heard of Cherokee. I’ve never seen a sign stating such place along SR 375 or SR 92, and I commute along that stretch of highway all day. Averagetennesseejoe (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grainger High School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Public school (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Halifax, Nova Scotia

Hello, I'm User:Aloha27 I recently undid an edit of yours to Halifax, Nova Scotia in which you described it as being the capital city of NS. There have been no designated cities in Nova Scotia since 1996 with the amalgamation of the major metropolitan areas encompassing Halifax Regional Municipality and Cape Breton Regional Municipality. Regards,   Aloha27  talk  20:16, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

In all legal and technical terms it is though. But whatever. --ACase0000 (talk) 20:45, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bob the Builder characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lucy Montgomery (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arc Productions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Before I Wake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shenandoah Valley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The 100 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Tennessee State Route 297 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tennessee State Route 297, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:24, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Leave me alone and stay off my talk page! --ACase0000 (talk) 14:47, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ACase0000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ACase0000. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tennessee State Route 297

Hello, ACase0000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tennessee State Route 297".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. SITH (talk) 20:42, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

@StraussInTheHouse: I ams sorry for not editing the page. I've been so busy and never at the chance to finish it. --ACase0000 (talk) 04:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennessee State Route 297 (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Praxidicae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tennessee State Route 297 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tennessee State Route 297, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:01, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

Hello, I'm TenPoundHammer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Greeneville Commons, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Consensus is that shopping mall articles do NOT list the individual stores as it violates WP:NOTDIR. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:23, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @TenPoundHammer:. Please be more specific with your edit summaries, instead of just saying "no" in them. And I know all about citing sources, I have been here for years!! I will try to find some and add them. Good night. --ACase0000 (talk) 07:09, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Tennessee State Route 297 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Tennessee State Route 297, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tennessee State Route 297 (December 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tennessee State Route 297 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tennessee State Route 297, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Keith Miller (journalist)

The article Keith Miller (journalist) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. JBL (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tennessee State Route 297

Hello, ACase0000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tennessee State Route 297".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 08:24, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Bean Station, Tennessee GA Reassessment

Bean Station, Tennessee, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. --Whiteguru (talk) 08:01, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

Edit at Lakewood Ranch

I reverted your edit to Lakewood Ranch, Florida, because you claimed the population figure was for the 2020 census, but the web page you cited was for the 2019 population estimate, not the 2020 census. - Donald Albury 12:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Albury: You must not know how to navigate the website. It clearly states the April 1, 2020 population. Look again, scroll down and you'll find it.. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/lakewoodranchcdpflorida/POP010220

From the website: Population

Population estimates, July 1, 2019, (V2019)XPopulation estimates base, April 1, 2010, (V2019)XPopulation, percent change - April 1, 2010 (estimates base) to July 1, 2019, (V2019) XPopulation, Census, April 1, 2020 34,877

I fixed the page, when you click on the link look for the area that is highlighted and says "Population, Census, April 1, 2020 34,877". --ACase0000 (talk) 19:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Your edit at 00:45 19 October 2021 UTC added a link to the 2019 estimate, not to the 2020 census. - Donald Albury 23:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

@Donald Albury: On my end it shows both, 2019 estimate and the 2020 census. I clicked on the link on 3 different devices, including a computer and still shows both. --ACase0000 (talk) 01:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Are you looking at the first edit you made here, the one that I reverted? In the infobox you changed the "population as of" parameter from 2010 to 2020, and added "34,877" to the "population total" parameter. You then added to the lead a new paragraph, "According to the 2020 census, the community had a population of 34,877.<ref>https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/lakewoodranchcdpflorida/INC110219</ref>". There was nothing else in that edit. - Donald Albury 13:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

I am talking about the reference I linked to the census website..... It linked to well, census information for Lakewood Ranch for the 2020 census. I am sorry that you were unable to see the 2020 census information on the website, it showed it for me as well as 2019 estimates. I am done with this conversation. I am sorry for trying to help out. Have a wonderful day. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Fate: The Winx Saga

Like you, I am concerned about the recent changes that have been made to the 'Cast and characters' section of this article (esp. by IP editors). Many of the recent changes violate WP:RECENTISM, and also the idea that plot developments belong in the 'Episodes' section and not in the character summaries. A couple of suggestions: 1) if this continues with the IP edits, I would suggest taking the article to WP:RfPP to ask for semi-protection; and 2) since many of the recent changes are bad, I would suggest mostly rolling the character summaries back to roughly this Sept. 16 version of the article, and synthesizing that with any recent changes you have made. But this "X's boyfriend", "Y's former girlfriend" rubbish, which is the kind of junk IP editors tend to add, has got to go. My $0.02. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 01:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

@IJBall: It is awful how bad it's gotten with the IP edits.... I will consider what you suggested. Thanks for agreeing and helping me out. --ACase0000 (talk) 17:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Another IP just tried the same garbage in the 'Cast' section here – I've it rolled back. I don't have this article on my watchlist (though I'm now considering adding it). I'm hoping you do have it on your watchlist – if you do, please keep an eye on it, and revert any bad IP edits like this. Thanks. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 13:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)

I'm going to request IP protection for the page. –ACase0000 (talk) 00:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Buladean, North Carolina moved to draftspace

--ACase0000 (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC) An article you recently created, Buladean, North Carolina, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: I've been searching for books and news articles that mention Buladean. Could you help me determine if they're suitable? I believe that they are, but I'd like a second opinion. If you are willing.

–ACase0000 (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Of course I'm willing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:29, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Thank you! Here's a few I think may be suitable.

1. NC Gazetteer

2. A book mention of Buladean

3. This one maybe too dark for use

–ACase0000 (talk) 02:04, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: Hi. I added two of the above sources to the page. Can you please review them when you have time and let me know if you think they are suitable. -–ACase0000 (talk) 20:55, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Yes, those look good. If you submit it, let me know and I'll review it. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:24, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969: I submitted it. -–ACase0000 (talk) 20:51, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

I moved it back to article space. It was basically fine to begin with and probably should never have been draftified. The references I found were easy to look up and add to the article. You did good work on this little article. Keep it up! Kevin ^{Hallward's Ghost (Let's talk)} 16:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Joelle Garguilo

Hello, ACase0000,

It looks like you didn't receive a notification but this article was tagged for Proposed deletion and deleted. You can see the PROD deletion rationale on the deleted page. If you would like to address the concerns, you can ask for its restoration at WP:REFUND. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know. The article did not serve an purpose anyways. –ACase0000 (talk) 01:52, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Afton, Tennessee

Hey there! I appreciate your contributions, I just wanted to note that being able to "google" something does not warrant inclusion in Wikipedia. Statements need to be verified by WP:RS, and WP:GOOGLEMAPS is not generally a reliable source for info besides basic street names, as it is editable by the community. I've kept your edit up, but if you could find an appropriate source, that would be perfect! glman (talk) 13:20, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2023

Volume 10, Issue 1 • Fall 2023 • About the Newsletter

Features

• A New Future for Road Articles Online

Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi 1979 → on 19:00, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Eliza Taylor

Hello, ACase0000. Maybe you didn't notice, but last time the bot changed Josephine's character from "main" to "recurring" and it will probably do it again for the simple reason that Josephine Lightbourne wasn't actually the main character, whether you like it or not. The "recurring" IS more accurate regardless of the fact that she is played by Eliza.

So, they will change it again sooner or later, so you can fight it (if you want). Bye. Kizo2703 (talk) 19:12, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

@Kizo2703: Recurring is only reserved for those who are credited as Guest Starring. Eliza was listed as a "Starring" cast member for all her appearances. However if they do revert it, I won't bother with it again. Have a nice day. 06:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NBC Meteorologists

Template:NBC Meteorologists has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:15, 5 December 2023 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: I don't care. --ACase0000 (talk) 02:52, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wild Cards (Canadian TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Thorpe. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Way Home (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rob Stewart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greeneville Commons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bealls.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:10, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

When Hope Calls

No it does not. The series ran from 2019 TO 2021. Episodes don't need to have aired in 2020 for that to be the case. Kohan didn't leave the show and then come back at a later point, she was in all 12 episodes. Rusted AutoParts 04:50, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

@Rusted AutoParts: WHATEVER. I don't care anymore. Bye! –ACase0000 (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)