Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Roads/Newsletter/Issues/Volume08/Issue03
Volume 8, Issue 3 • Summer 2015 • About the Newsletter |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Road to the past: Some tips on researching history sections
Of the big three sections in a good highway article, the hardest to write is usually the history section. The route description and junction/exit list table can each be compiled and written off readily accessible modern maps. In contrast, the history section will normally require a trip or trips to a library or access to online databases. As part of our on-going series of tutorials this year, we would like to present some insights into dealing with the historical research needed to write highway articles. To start, a word of caution is in order. There are a number of great roadgeek websites on the Internet that document the histories of our state highways, like http://www.michiganhighways.org. These are great resources to give a writer a starting point on his quest to writing a history section. However, most of them cannot be used as a source in a Wikipedia article under the reliable source guidelines.[1] That just means we need to find sources to verify or expand upon the information given on those sites, and then we can cite those sources in our footnotes. Some of these websites even list their references, allowing us to track down the original sources used. We can then link to the roadgeek site at the bottom of the article to give readers another place to look for information after they read our article. Many libraries offer excellent resources we can exploit. The Peter White Public Library in Marquette, Michigan, or the Van Pelt and Opie Library at Michigan Technological University in Houghton for example, maintain vertical files on the area's roads. These files contain newspaper clippings and other documents organized by topic area. Others, like the Grand Rapids Public Library, maintain card file indexes to newspaper articles they have on microfilm. Both of these are great resources to find old newspaper articles, but there are others online. Through the Wikipedia Library, editors can sign up for accounts with different databases, including Newspapers.com. Google News also has searchable archives of old newspapers that can be used to locate sources. It may take several searches with various combinations of keywords or dates to isolate useful sources. These databases will also find plenty of articles on traffic accidents that make finding the most useful sources a bit harder. If an editor has a timeline of historical events from a roadgeek site, she can use that to narrow down newspaper searches by using the location(s) and dates as keywords in addition to the highway designation. Other useful keywords include the name of the DOT, or the name the agency used at the time. Searchers should also try variations on the highway's designation, especially in the case of US or state highways. When working on researching the Interstates or US Highways, we have a collection of AASHTO's committee minutes that are indexed at WP:USRD/AASHTO. The various newspaper archives online can also be valuable because they may have indexed papers in other areas that ran Associated Press or United Press International wire stories. The Traverse City Record-Eagle has run wire stories on I-75 even though the city is nowhere near that freeway, for instance. For more recent changes during the modern Internet era, many DOTs have archives of their press releases. It may be necessary to search an older edition of the DOT's website through an archiving service like http://www.archive.org/ to pull up some of the oldest press releases published online. Older press releases that predate the modern Internet era may be archived in major libraries in the state capital or at a state university. Another option is to look for internal DOT documentation online or at a DOT's library. MDOT maintains a set of right-of-way maps online for each county, with separate sheets that break down highways into smaller segments. These map sheets can contain notations such as the transfer date of the Capitol Loop in Lansing. Mn/DOT has a set of maintenance logs online for their state highways that would list reconstruction projects such as realignments or extensions. TxDOT documents every alignment change since 1939 in their Highway Designation Files, and other states have similar documentation. Barring that, the tried and true standby option for historical research on highways are the various archives of old official state maps. The Library of Michigan has most of Michigan's official state maps archived, and if they lack a copy of a specific edition, MDOT's library is just a couple blocks away. I have also visited WisDOT's library in Madison, Wisconsin, for research on the U.S. Route 8 and U.S. Route 141 articles. More and more, state DOTs are putting their old maps online as well, sometimes in collaboration with a statewide library, as in the case of Minnesota. Other map series can be used, but it is best if the same publisher is used to eliminate errors related to the frequency of updates. By comparing the maps before and after changes to a highway's routing, we can at least narrow down that change to a range of time. When we write about these events in the articles, we would need to give an approximate timeframe instead of an exact date. In this case, at least two footnotes will be necessary at the end of the cited passage, one to the before map, and one to the after.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Getting to know the editors behind the lenses
This issue, we interview a pair of photographers who have contributed roads photos, SounderBruce and Royalboil.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assessment roundup
Statistics as of September 2, 2015.
During the past few months, there has been little to no change in the WikiWork of the top 10 states. It should be noted though that Delaware is now the second state to have all articles at GA or better after Michigan. For full stats on all 50 states and more updated almost daily, take a look at WP:USRD/A/S. Now let's see how the project is doing overall.
Since the last issue, we did not add any Featured Articles, but added a Featured List (Pure Michigan Byway), a Good Topic (Interstate Highways in Michigan), a new A-Class article (California State Route 94), and saw a net gain of 4 Good Articles. Overall, our relative WikiWork dropped 0.01 and we saw a net loss of one stub.
|
State updates
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In other project news...
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selected articlesThe following articles appeared as the Selected article on a portal or task force page in the spring quarter: |
Selected picturesThe following photos appeared as the Selected picture on the U.S. Roads Portal in the spring quarter:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From the editorsThe next quarterly issue should be out in the fall. The editors of the newsletter would like to hear from you, the reader. What do you like about the current format? What should be changed? Removed? Added? Your comments are needed. Lastly, remember that this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of next issue released for the fall. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing! |
Contributors to this issue
|