User talk:JML1148/Archive 11
Question from Sanescious (20:32, 5 March 2024)
[edit]Hello I would like to know on how can i add my details as an artist, producer, beat maker and rapper --Sanescious (talk) 20:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanescious: Wikipedia strongly discourages making an article for yourself, but you still are allowed to provided you follow the conflict of interest guidelines. If you are already notable, it is likely you already have an article. Before doing anything, I would check to see if you meet notability guidlines, particularly WP:NSINGER, before doing anything. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:51, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok i will wait for your go ahead 41.150.221.213 (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Sanescious: I'm not your supervisor. Start whenever you want. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok i will wait for your go ahead 41.150.221.213 (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Haspsyokes (11:03, 6 March 2024)
[edit]hello, do you know why is it that wikipedia marks words like "honoured" and "sulphur" as incorrect grammer(might be wrong term, I mean the red line underneath the word), and should I replace it with the other spelling of the word? (eg: honored, sulfur) --Haspsyokes (talk) 11:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Haspsyokes: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! 'Honoured' and 'sulphur' are the correct spellings for British or Australian English, whereas 'honored' and 'sulfur' are the correct spellings for American English. I'm assuming your browser or device is set to British English for some reason. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Irma Fritz (20:00, 7 March 2024)
[edit]Hello James! Good to meet you! I'm a fiction writer. Aside from English, I read/write German. I'd like to get started on Wikipedia, perhaps by creating my own Wiki page. --Irma Fritz (talk) 20:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Irma Fritz: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm just going to partially copy advice I've already given to editors in the same boat as you, I hope you don't mind. Wikipedia strongly discourages making an article for yourself, but you still are allowed to provided you follow the conflict of interest guidelines. Please make sure you are notable first, otherwise it is almost certain your article will be deleted. I would check notability guidelines, particularly WP:NAUTHOR, before doing anything. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:58, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: February 2024
[edit]
|
Stadio Olimpico
[edit]Thanks, I wish for it to become a good article but I am aware that the article needs editing by a native speaker who well knows English. -- Blackcat 19:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: No worries! Just so you know, I probably won't have much time to copyedit the article today, but I'll get to it tomorrow. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 21:14, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok. Just a thing, in the lead you asked whether 90,000 were the highest attendance for a concert at all, or only for the Olimpico. Of course it's the Olimpico only (Paul McCartney made > 200,000 in Rio de Janeiro in 1990...). I guess I explained it later in the article. -- Blackcat 21:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: Another thing, in the 'Stadio dei Centomila' section, the sentence
CONI chairman Giulio Onesti announced that renewal works would finish in 1950
is used, but there doesn't seem to be any other information before it about a renewal project. Am I missing something, or is there missing context? JML1148 (talk | contribs) 09:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Blackcat: Another thing, in the 'Stadio dei Centomila' section, the sentence
- Ok. Just a thing, in the lead you asked whether 90,000 were the highest attendance for a concert at all, or only for the Olimpico. Of course it's the Olimpico only (Paul McCartney made > 200,000 in Rio de Janeiro in 1990...). I guess I explained it later in the article. -- Blackcat 21:22, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Onesti was appointed chairman of CONI and his first task was the renewal of the venue. According to Piero Ostilio Rossi (Rossi, PO; Gatti, I. (1991) Roma. Guida all'architettura moderna 1909-1991, pp 351-52), the project was presented in 1949 by Vitellozzi and Roccatelli, and realized between 1951-53 by Vitellozzi, Valle and Pintonello because Roccatelli died in 1951 before the work started. -- Blackcat 20:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
PS BTW of this: Consiglio superiore dei Lavori Pubblici (Superior Council of Public Works) is a government agency which board is composed by architects, engineers and lawyers which is charged to supersede to tenders for public works. Now it happens rarely if never at all, but in the past its members also used to take part to the projects of State-owned buildings.
- Onesti was appointed chairman of CONI and his first task was the renewal of the venue. According to Piero Ostilio Rossi (Rossi, PO; Gatti, I. (1991) Roma. Guida all'architettura moderna 1909-1991, pp 351-52), the project was presented in 1949 by Vitellozzi and Roccatelli, and realized between 1951-53 by Vitellozzi, Valle and Pintonello because Roccatelli died in 1951 before the work started. -- Blackcat 20:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Your close
[edit]Thanks your for your considered close. Per your comments re: AN/I I did take action towards the end of the RfC at AE that resulted in a topic ban from two subjects for the editor you named. I should have handled myself better during the whole episode and I got a warning for my behaviour also. TarnishedPathtalk 10:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath: Thank you for the heads up regarding the AN thread. I didn't realise that Mkstokes received a topic ban or that the thread existed. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Engagement in WP:GRAVEDANCING and WP:NPA
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Nick McKenzie talk page]. The basis of this is the idea that the blocked/banned/retired editor owns the content they created, and that this content was invalidated at the same time they were blocked, banned or decided to retire. This is incorrect, since the editor may originally have meant very well, and done good work, before they eventually flamed out. This also seems like a personal attack in violation of WP:NPA. I'll note that while Mkstokes currently has a topic ban, he is not banned from responding to your accusations, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:MaskedSinger/Archive_2
EXAMPLES OF GRAVEDANCING
Examples of gravedancing may include:
* Insults/accusations/other behavior directed at editors who are now blocked or banned. This is motivated by the idea that the editor in question won't be able to respond to the comment. This is wrong even if the editor in question never sees it because it contributes to a negative environment that is less likely to encourage editors to work together.
* Behaving as though a consensus is no longer valid simply because a blocked or banned editor contributed to it. Whilst consensus can change, the simple act of blocking does not change it - if you wish to overturn the previous consensus then further input should be sought.
Despite claiming "There is consensus to remove the disputed content," it is clear none was achieved to remove said content. If it had been obtained, there would be no concern that "This is going to be a controversial closure, given the numerical majority against removing the content." Mkstokes (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mkstokes: When I made the close at Nick McKenzie, I did not know of the WP:AN thread that existed, nor your topic ban. Neither of those things factored into my close as a result. If I have caused hurt, I apologise, but I don't think it qualifies as gravedancing because I did not know of your topic ban, and you are still able to respond to my comments. I also don't believe I did either of the examples of gravedancing that you have mentioned.
- I do have more of an issue with the final part of your comment, though. RfCs and other discussions aren't closed based off of a simple vote tally. Instead, we work based on consensus. Per WP:DETCON, consensus
is ascertained by the quality of the arguments given on the various sides of an issue, as viewed through the lens of Wikipedia policy.
This means that closes may be made even if the numerical majority is against, if the quality of arguments on the minority are much stronger than the majority, which was the case in this discussion. I explained this in my closure note. The reason I left the comment about it being a controversial close is because closes against the numerical majority can obviously look unfair, particularly if you are involved and have a strong viewpoint. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)- Then you didn't do proper research before closing the item. There was no hurt caused as I am now fully aware of the way Wikipedia skews it's policies and guidelines to fit a leftist viewpoint. However, the apology is greatly appreciated. No one seems to take policies regarding public figures seriously on Biographies of living persons. As the dispute was thoroughly handled via the dispute process, there was no need to add your personal admonitions to the editors involved and to single me out for personal insult. As an experienced editor, you knew that any personal attack would come back to me when you tagged me, so the intent is clear. As you didn't know I was under a topic ban, I retract my warning and this can be either closed or deleted. Your prerogative. Mkstokes (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mkstokes: I've struck your comment, which is standard procedure for retracted statements. Since you seem reluctant to communicate any further, I will not respond to other parts of your comment. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's not that I'm reluctant to communicate with you. Rather, there are specific editors waiting for any opportunity to impose additional sanctions on me. Therefore I have to be very careful not to give them any cogent reason to do so via my Wikipedia contributions. You're welcome to email me if you want further discussion. Mkstokes (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mkstokes, the edit at Special:Diff/1213191446 in which you mention an article from which you are topic banned is a violation of your topic ban. Further this edit at Special:Diff/1213316863 in which you criticise an editor's close of an RfC about a subject which you are topic banned from is a violation of your topic ban. @Ivanvector, for your attention. TarnishedPathtalk 23:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath, as you'll notice, the editor specifically tagged me in his closure while additionally insulting me. As @Ivanvector previously mentioned, "Mkstokes is banned from commenting on this topic; they're not banned from responding to...accusations." I accused @JML1148 of grave dancing and violating the no personal attacks policy on two points:
- 1. Insults/accusations/other behavior
- 2. Behaving as though a consensus is no longer valid
- This issue has been cleared up, apologies and appreciations have been exchanged, I admitted my mistake, and the issue has been put to rest. You have been warned by the administrator that "A topic ban is not an invitation for you to follow the sanctioned user around and point out every mistake they make." This additional accusation as well as your comments on the talk page of the Fani Willis BLP are a clear indication that you either don't understand or don't care about the policies related to hounding. Ivanvector warned you, "...please don't harass editors even if they are sanctioned, unless you want to see your names beside logged interaction bans at WP:AELOG." I'm graciously willing to give you one last chance to drop your all consuming desire to get me. However, if Ivanvector wishes to submit you for addition to the Arbitration enforcement log, I will fully support his actions. I have full confidence that he will make the correct decision. Mkstokes (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mkstokes, I'm clearly not following you around as evidenced by the thread above which I'd come back to see a response to. I suggest you strike your ridiculous statements. TarnishedPathtalk 03:17, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- As per your aspersions about hounding, participation in a single RfC does not constitute anything approaching that. Notably, as soon as I participated in that RfC you replied to my !vote immediately and then badgered me for a while. By your definition is that hounding? If you think I have a case to answer I invite you to take it to WP:AN/I. TarnishedPathtalk 03:26, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Mkstokes: I've struck your comment, which is standard procedure for retracted statements. Since you seem reluctant to communicate any further, I will not respond to other parts of your comment. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:49, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Then you didn't do proper research before closing the item. There was no hurt caused as I am now fully aware of the way Wikipedia skews it's policies and guidelines to fit a leftist viewpoint. However, the apology is greatly appreciated. No one seems to take policies regarding public figures seriously on Biographies of living persons. As the dispute was thoroughly handled via the dispute process, there was no need to add your personal admonitions to the editors involved and to single me out for personal insult. As an experienced editor, you knew that any personal attack would come back to me when you tagged me, so the intent is clear. As you didn't know I was under a topic ban, I retract my warning and this can be either closed or deleted. Your prerogative. Mkstokes (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Editor reflections
[edit]You don't need to be invited. I am happy you decided to take the leap and provide your perspective even if I haven't formally asked :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Clovermoss: Thank you :) JML1148 (talk | contribs) 03:35, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Half Barnstar | |
Thank you for bringing a contentious discussion to a close. Despite my accusation, you acted as a neutral, uninterested party and quashed a pointless discussion. You are an intellectually honest and fair-minded editor! Mkstokes (talk) 03:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC) |
RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I
[edit]Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
- Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
- Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
- Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
- Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
- Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
- Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
- Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
- Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
- Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
- Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
- Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
- Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
- Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
- Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
- Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
- Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
- Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm sorry about this
[edit]These accounts have a way of drawing people into arguments. I'm most sorry. TarnishedPathtalk 10:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath: Don't apologise. When I closed the RfC, I knew this was going to happen. Someone had to do it, and I decided it was going to be me. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:25, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- If I'd handled myself better earlier and taken action earlier perhaps we wouldn't be where we are now. TarnishedPathtalk 10:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- @TarnishedPath: What's done is done, no point mulling on the past. Anyway, let's hope this month-long block dissuades them from editing disruptively again. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- If I'd handled myself better earlier and taken action earlier perhaps we wouldn't be where we are now. TarnishedPathtalk 10:28, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors 2023 Annual Report
Our 2023 Annual Report is now ready for review.
Highlights:
– Your Guild coordinators:
Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
2022 Optus data breach
[edit]Hello, JML1148. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for 2022 Optus data breach at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 03:23, 18 March 2024 (UTC) |
Question from IncidentScribe (11:21, 18 March 2024)
[edit]Hey, how can I create a page for a software/tool? How can I be an auto confirmed user? --IncidentScribe (talk) 11:21, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
- @IncidentScribe: The autoconfirmed permission is automatically given to users with at least 10 edits and an account over 4 days old. I'm guessing you want to make a page for Squadcast, looking at your talk page. If this is the case, definitely read the simple conflict of interest guide and implement its advice. For a new user, I would strongly recommend you create your article through the Article Wizard. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Question from Hon. KIBEDI MOSES (06:09, 22 March 2024)
[edit]Hello am trying to upload my data and information but its being rejected. i also might have unknowing uploaded my data to wikimedia commons instead of wikipedia so am abit stuck --Growth & Comfort Never co-Exist (talk) 06:09, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Hon. KIBEDI MOSES: I don't see any edits from you except you creating your userpage, so I don't know what's being 'rejected' - can you explain a bit more? You've only uploaded photos to Wikimedia Commons, which is what that site is for. Also, Wikipedia strongly discourages editing about yourself or things you have a close connection with. If you do still want to edit about yourself, as your question implies, read the simple conflict of interest guide. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 08:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- when i search my name Hon. MOSES KIBEDI I DONT SEE ANY THING TURNING UP FROM WIKIPEDIA Growth & Comfort Never co-Exist (talk) 10:33, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2024
[edit]- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Idk how to make a page.
[edit]Need help on basically everything. Also, how to make pictures and line bartiers between sections? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoolEagle cake The Original (talk • contribs) 09:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @CoolEagle cake The Original: You seem to have worked out how to make a draft article, which is a good start. However, it is very clearly an essay, rather than an encyclopaedic article, and will not be accepted as an article per WP:NOTESSAY. I would recommend you work on existing articles before creating new ones. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 23:39, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
[edit]Hello JML1148,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
March 2024 GOCE drive award
[edit]The Modest Barnstar | ||
This barnstar is awarded to JML1148 for copy edits totaling over 4,000 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Enforcing ECR for article creators on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from LoLIamHappy (12:06, 9 April 2024)
[edit]Hey sorry to bother you. How do i add a source for information that’s relatively new so the new information dosent get removed? --LoLIamHappy (talk) 12:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @LoLIamHappy: I'm assuming you already have a source - if you don't, you cannot add the content, as almost all statements on Wikipedia require a source. Have a look at Help:Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor if you're using visual editor, or Help:Referencing for beginners if you're using source editor. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from Littleeinsteinsisfire22bro (15:13, 9 April 2024)
[edit]hi --Littleeinsteinsisfire22bro (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Littleeinsteinsisfire22bro: Hello! Do you have a question? JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: March 2024
[edit]
|
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors April 2024 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the April 2024 newsletter, a quarterly digest of Guild activities since December. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. We extend a warm welcome to all of our new members. We wish you all happy copy-editing. Election results: In our December 2023 coordinator election, Zippybonzo stepped down as coordinator; we thank them for their service. Incumbents Dhtwiki and Miniapolis were reelected coordinators, and Wracking was newly elected coordinator, to serve through 30 June. Nominations for our mid-year Election of Coordinators will open on 1 June (UTC). Drive: 46 editors signed up for our January Backlog Elimination Drive, 32 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 289 articles totaling 626,729 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: 23 editors signed up for our February Copy Editing Blitz. 18 claimed at least one copy-edit and between them, they copy-edited 100,293 words in 32 articles. Barnstars awarded are here. Drive: 53 editors signed up for our March Backlog Elimination Drive, 34 of whom claimed at least one copy-edit. Between them, they copy-edited 300 articles totaling 587,828 words. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Sign up for our April Copy Editing Blitz, which runs from 14 to 20 April. Barnstars will be awarded here. Progress report: As of 23:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have processed 109 requests since 1 January 2024, and the backlog stands at 2,480 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
Question from TheAstorPastor (08:50, 12 April 2024)
[edit]Hello I am new to Wikipidea and it seems that you have been assigned as a mentor to me ,so Hi :) --TheAstorPastor (talk) 08:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TheAstorPastor: Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Do you have a question? JML1148 (talk | contribs) 07:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- nah just greetings :) TheAstorPastor (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- @TheAstorPastor: No worries :) JML1148 (talk | contribs) 02:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- nah just greetings :) TheAstorPastor (talk) 09:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 April newsletter
[edit]We are approaching the end of the 2024 WikiCup's second round, with a little over two weeks remaining. Currently, contestants must score at least 105 points to progress to the third round.
Our current top scorers are as follows:
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 642 points, mostly from 11 GAs about radio and television;
- voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two FAs (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three GAs;
- Generalissima (submissions) with 523 points, mostly from 11 GAs about coinage and history;
- SounderBruce (submissions) with 497 points, mostly from a FA about the 2020 season of the soccer club Seattle Sounders FC and two GAs;
- Tamzin (submissions) with 410 points, mostly from a FA about the drink Capri-Sun and three GAs;
- Kusma (submissions) with 330 points, mostly from a FA about the English botanist Anna Blackburne and a GA.
Competitors may submit work for the second round until the end of 28 April, and the third round starts 1 May. Remember that only competitors with the top 32 scores will make it through to the third round. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs. As a reminder, competitors are strictly prohibited from gaming Wikipedia policies or processes to receive more points.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please read Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi, how do edits work --Zebralter (talk) 15:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Zebralter: Hello! Can you please give a bit more detail about what you want to know? Your question is a bit too vague for me to properly answer. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:33, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I figured some of it out 2601:243:1301:7250:A024:1026:8302:55F8 (talk) 20:50, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from GrayWhiteSaint (12:20, 20 April 2024)
[edit]Hello, I want to edit an entry written about this subject that had already been attempted to be made as an article by another user, but that was reject. Reason being for lack of sources and I would like to make an edit of the entry but having trouble in finding resources for the subject matter. Can you assist me in giving me tips in how to find sources for the subject matter? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Peach_and_Goma is the entry in question, and thank you --GrayWhiteSaint (talk) 12:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @GrayWhiteSaint: Honestly, I doubt something like this will be considered notable, mostly because there's likely a lack of sources for it. Searching for Chinese-language news articles is probably your best bet. When reviewing sources, make sure that they meet WP:SIGCOV, particularly the 'reliable sources that are independent of the subject' part. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, and that does sound like a great start in trying to find sources. Regardless thank you for your reply and help! GrayWhiteSaint (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from DrewColussi on Christianity in Zimbabwe (06:50, 25 April 2024)
[edit]How to add citation --DrewColussi (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Question from DrewColussi on Christianity in Zimbabwe (06:50, 25 April 2024) (2)
[edit]How to add citation --DrewColussi (talk) 06:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024
[edit]- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of states with limited recognition on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 17:30, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 May newsletter
[edit]The second round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 April. This round was particularly competitive: each of the 32 contestants who advanced to Round 3 scored at least 141 points. This is the highest number of points required to advance to Round 3 since 2014.
The following scorers in Round 2 all scored more than 500 points:
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 707 points, mostly from 45 good article nomination reviews and 12 good articless about radio and television;
- Generalissima (submissions) with 600 points, mostly from 12 good articles and 12 did you know nominations about coinage and history;
- SounderBruce (submissions) with 552 points, mostly from a featured article about the 2020 Seattle Sounders FC season, three featured lists, and two good articles;
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 548 points, mostly from a featured article about the snooker player John Pulman, two featured lists, and one good article;
- voorts (submissions) with 530 points, mostly from two featured articles (Well he would, wouldn't he? and Cora Agnes Benneson) and three good articles.
The full scores for Round 2 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 18 featured articles, 22 featured lists, and 186 good articles, 76 in the news credits and at least 200 did you know credits. They have conducted 165 featured article reviews, as well as 399 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 21 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed during Round 3, which starts on 1 May at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Hunter Biden on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:31, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
Question from TheXboxGamer2002 (18:12, 2 May 2024)
[edit]Why do my edits keep getting changed bruv --TheXboxGamer2002 (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.
This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.
The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.
Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.
On behalf of the UCoC project team,
RamzyM (WMF) 23:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Question from Riverza 413 (17:51, 3 May 2024)
[edit]Hello,
how do i save/stop editing when im done editing? --Riverza 413 (talk) 17:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
RFA2024 update: phase I concluded, phase II begins
[edit]Hi there! Phase I of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review has concluded, with several impactful changes gaining community consensus and proceeding to various stages of implementation. Some proposals will be implemented in full outright; others will be discussed at phase II before being implemented; and still others will proceed on a trial basis before being brought to phase II. The following proposals have gained consensus:
- Proposals 2 and 9b (phase II discussion): Add a reminder of civility norms at RfA and Require links for claims of specific policy violations
- Proposal 3b (in trial): Make the first two days discussion-only
- Proposal 13 (in trial): Admin elections
- Proposal 14 (implemented): Suffrage requirements
- Proposals 16 and 16c (phase II discussion): Allow the community to initiate recall RfAs and Community recall process based on dewiki
- Proposal 17 (phase II discussion): Have named Admins/crats to monitor infractions
- Proposal 24 (phase II discussion): Provide better mentoring for becoming an admin and the RfA process
- Proposal 25 (implemented): Require nominees to be extended confirmed
See the project page for a full list of proposals and their outcomes. A huge thank-you to everyone who has participated so far :) looking forward to seeing lots of hard work become a reality in phase II. theleekycauldron (talk), via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:09, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello James, It is good coming in contact with you online. I would like to understand few things here, please:
1. By Wikipedia definition, or main idea of this Wikipedia program, what is the meaning of editing?
2. If editing by overall definition which means to improve or correct an article or information is considered as the main idea here do you have a team or system to detect people who are editing on Wikipedia on a daily basis as to whether the information they are using as an edit is correct or not?
3. Do people get paid for editing or posting new article or so? --Dgbarsue (talk) 00:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Dgbarsue: Hello, thank you for your questions. The first question is quite vague and one I can't really answer, but I can certainly your last two questions. Wikipedia cannot really ensure that everything in an article is correct, as no one has the time nor want to dig through every single edit and work out whether the added content is true. However, edits without a citation, which most intentionally misleading edits are, are usually removed by anti-vandalism patrollers. Finally, the answer to your last question is, unfortunately, yes. Wikipedia's policy on paid editing is that people can edit provided they disclose who are paying them. Most of the time, these paid articles are either poorly written or don't pass the basic notability guideline, so they are deleted fairly quickly. Despite all of the warnings not to, paid editors are an unfortunately common occurrence. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 11:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Question from Kosha22kosh on User talk:JML1148 (04:03, 9 May 2024)
[edit]نحن نكمل بعض لي بعض كوشا مصر --Kosha22kosh (talk) 04:03, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Kosha22kosh: This is the English Wikipedia - all communication is done in English. If you want, there is an Arabic Wikipedia that you can contribute to. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 11:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: April 2024
[edit]
|
Question from Steven7942 (04:16, 12 May 2024)
[edit]Hi, I hope I did a good job with my first post - I just don't know how to link the content to other people, e.g. where I mention that Wally worked with Billy Butler (DJ). Thanks, Steven. --Steven7942 (talk) 04:16, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Steven7942: We call this 'wikilinking', in case you ever see that term. Use Ctrl+K or press the chain button in Visual Editor while highlighting what you want to be linked, or use two square brackets at the start and end of what you want linked in the source editor. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 10:34, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, I tried my best! Steven7942 (talk) 03:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Question from Tim Prophit (15:13, 13 May 2024)
[edit]I would like to create a Wiki page for my sailboat racing team, to include the various boats, people, events, results, over almost 40 years of existence. How do I start? Thank you. --Tim Prophit (talk) 15:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Leonid Brezhnev on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia proposals request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Designated RfA monitors on a "Wikipedia proposals" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 16 May 2024
[edit]- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
Question from SachinVaidya i-SourceInfosystems (12:40, 16 May 2024)
[edit]hello. could you guide me on 1) how to check if i am an auto-confirmed / confirmed user 2) can i create a company page now 3) how i could go about doing edits. thanks --SachinVaidya i-SourceInfosystems (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Question from Razibhowlader67 (09:52, 18 May 2024)
[edit]Profile Picture --Razibhowlader67 (talk) 09:52, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: History and geography request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests on a "History and geography" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Dmitri Shostakovich on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)
Glumpixie (talk) 06:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Question from Entire Cover Insurance (12:39, 28 May 2024)
[edit]Hi,
I have written up the Wiki page I am looking to publish. Please can you tell me if it's live or awaiting some form of review?
Thanks, --Entire Cover Insurance (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:12, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Biographies request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Greta Gerwig on a "Biographies" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Question from Prolancer724 (16:39, 4 June 2024)
[edit]My Post is Rejecting Multiple times. --Prolancer724 (talk) 16:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Question from KeiqutieOndMic (14:46, 5 June 2024)
[edit]Hello How do I upload my bio and files to Wikipedia --KeiqutieOndMic (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2024).
- Phase II of the 2024 RfA review has commenced to improve and refine the proposals passed in Phase I.
- The Nuke feature, which enables administrators to mass delete pages, will now correctly delete pages which were moved to another title. T43351
- The arbitration case Venezuelan politics has been closed.
- The Committee is seeking volunteers for various roles, including access to the conflict of interest VRT queue.
- WikiProject Reliability's unsourced statements drive is happening in June 2024 to replace {{citation needed}} tags with references! Sign up here to participate!
Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors June 2024 Newsletter
Hello and welcome to the June 2024 newsletter, a quarterly-ish digest of Guild activities since April. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below. Election news: Wanted: new Guild coordinators! If you value and enjoy the GOCE, why not help out behind the scenes? Nominations for our mid-year coordinator election are now open until 23:59 on 15 June (UTC). Self-nominations are welcome. Voting commences at 00:01 on 16 June and continues until 23:50 on 30 June. Results will be announced at the election page. Blitz: Nine of the fourteen editors who signed up for the April 2024 Copy Editing Blitz copy edited at least one article. Between them, they copy edited 55,853 words comprising twenty articles. Barnstars awarded are available here. Drive: 58 editors signed up for our May 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive and 33 of those completed at least one copy edit. 251 articles and 475,952 words were copy edited. Barnstars awarded are here. Blitz: Our June 2024 Copy Editing Blitz will begin on 16 June and finish on 22 June. Barnstars awarded will be posted here. Progress report: As of 05:23, 8 June 2024 (UTC) , GOCE copyeditors have completed 161 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 2,779 articles. Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from Baffle gab1978 and your GOCE coordinators Dhtwiki, Miniapolis and Wracking. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
|
The Signpost: 8 June 2024
[edit]- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
This Month in GLAM: May 2024
[edit]
|
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Penguin on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Question from Shoriful Shoron on User:Shoriful Shoron/sandbox (07:28, 29 June 2024)
[edit]Hello, How i add a picture in article with phone(Actually i didn’t find any option in phone)? --Shoriful Shoron (talk) 07:28, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 July newsletter
[edit]The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.
The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
- Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
- Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
- AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.
The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 4 July 2024
[edit]- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
Administrators' newsletter – July 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2024).
- Local administrators can now add new links to the bottom of the site Tools menu without using JavaScript. Documentation is available on MediaWiki. (T6086)
- The Community Wishlist is re-opening on 15 July 2024. Read more
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Question from Laurentchevrettedigital (18:14, 10 July 2024)
[edit]Hello,
I was wondering if my new draft version of 'Manoir Davis' has better chance to get published eventually? Thank you --Laurentchevrettedigital (talk) 18:14, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
This Month in GLAM: June 2024
[edit]
|
The Signpost: 22 July 2024
[edit]- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Question from Truth and Solidarity Movement (16:09, 23 July 2024)
[edit]I Want add information --Truth and Solidarity Movement (talk) 16:09, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Marked as away
[edit]I have marked you as "away" in the mentorship interface as you have not edited since May and a pile of unanswered questions is building up. Feel free to re-mark yourself as active if you return. Thanks. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2024).
- Global blocks may now target accounts as well as IP's. Administrators may locally unblock when appropriate.
- Users wishing to permanently leave may now request "vanishing" via Special:GlobalVanishRequest. Processed requests will result in the user being renamed, their recovery email being removed, and their account being globally locked.
- The Arbitration Committee appointed the following administrators to the conflict of interest volunteer response team: Bilby, Extraordinary Writ
This Month in GLAM: July 2024
[edit]
|
The Signpost: 14 August 2024
[edit]- In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse
- In focus: Twitter marks the spot
- News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded.
- Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?
- Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing
- Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird
- Humour: I'm proud to be a template
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:2024 United States presidential election on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:58, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
WikiCup 2024 August newsletter
[edit]The fourth round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 29 August. Each of the 8 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 472 points, and the following contestants scored more than 700 points:
- Generalissima (submissions) with 1,150 points, mostly from 3 featured articles, 2 featured lists, 7 good articles, and 13 did you know nominations;
- Arconning (submissions) with 791 points, mostly from 2 featured lists, 8 good articles, 4 did you know nominations, and plenty of reviews;
- AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) with 718 points, mostly from a high-multiplier featured article on Genghis Khan and 2 good articles; and
- BennyOnTheLoose (submissions) with 714 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Susanna Hoffs, 2 featured lists, and 3 good articles.
Congratulations to our eight finalists and all who participated. Contestants put in extraordinary amounts of effort during this round, and their scores can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 36 featured articles, 55 featured lists, 15 good articles, 93 in the news credits, and at least 333 did you know credits. They have conducted 357 featured content reviews, as well as 553 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 30 articles to featured topics and good topics.
Any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed during Round 5, which starts on 1 September at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. If two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Remember to claim your points within 14 days of earning them, and importantly, before the deadline on 31 October.
If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2024).
- Following an RfC, there is a new criterion for speedy deletion: C4, which
applies to unused maintenance categories, such as empty dated maintenance categories for dates in the past
. - A request for comment is open to discuss whether Notability (species) should be adopted as a subject-specific notability guideline.
- Following a motion, remedies 5.1 and 5.2 of World War II and the history of Jews in Poland (the topic and interaction bans on My very best wishes, respectively) were repealed.
- Remedy 3C of the German war effort case ("Cinderella157 German history topic ban") was suspended for a period of six months.
- The arbitration case Historical Elections is currently open. Proposed decision is expected by 3 September 2024 for this case.
- Editors can now enter into good article review circles, an alternative for informal quid pro quo arrangements, to have a GAN reviewed in return for reviewing a different editor's nomination.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in September 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles and redirects in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,900 articles and 26,200 redirects awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!