Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
Potentially notable, but this has been written with the help of ChatGPT so needs re-writing. Please also add in-line citations throughout by following the tutorial at WP:INTREFVE.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Manoir Davis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Laurentchevrettedigital!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne(talk)20:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see why I should wait *months* to get my articles published? Isn't Wikipedia open source? I'm dissapointed and confused... < I think maybe you are confused about the Articles for Creation process. You have submitted a draft article for review, and due to a large queue of articles waiting to be reviewed and a small number of volunteer reviewers, this process may take several months. The Articles for Creation process isn't the only way to create an article for Wikipedia, but is recommended for new users as it allows you to iterate and approve and get feedback from experienced editors. You can create a new article directly in Wikipedia, bypassing this process, instructions are at WP:YFA, but it would likely be deleted/moved to draftspace in its current format for reasons I will list below
Thanks for re-writing the draft to be more neutral, there are a few more issues with the draft before it is ready to be accepted:
It still has promotional content, and some repeated text, so will need some general copyediting. i.e. the entire "Local Attractions" section is just an advert.
It seems to focus more on the fact it is now a retreat, as opposed to the historic nature of the building. This feels like a thinly disguised advert for the retreat, so please most of that content and focus on the building itself.
