User talk:GOLDIEM J

Covid-19 general sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.

Broadly, general sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 09:08, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crazy Boy 826 01:46, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song) (June 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NSONG

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GOLDIEM J! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I just undid your edit to Suicide

I understand the goodwill with which you made it. This page has often been the target of editors with good and bad will, so a convention has developed there for consensus driven edits Fiddle Faddle 16:41, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Timtrent: I just talked about it on the talk page GOLDIEM J (talk) 16:45, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is perfect. Thank you. Fiddle Faddle 16:48, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TheSoul Publishing moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, TheSoul Publishing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — Amkgp 💬 15:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Technical Barnstar
	Thank you for helping me by removing the redirect. Atlantis77177 (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you GOLDIEM J (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: TheSoul Publishing (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:TheSoul Publishing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:TheSoul Publishing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 19:09, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baby I'm Yours (Breakbot and Irfane song)

Hello, GOLDIEM J. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Baby I'm Yours".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:42, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. Your recent edit(s) to the page A Visit from St. Nicholas appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. MichaelMaggs (talk) 21:23, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MichaelMaggs:Was that the actual original writing? Sorry I just never hear anyone say it as that. GOLDIEM J (talk) 21:33, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Friday Night Dinner

Hello. I just wanted to let you know I reverted your recent edit to Friday Night Dinner. I did this because, for the introduction, it overemphasises the Jewish elements to the show. Consider opening debate on the article’s talk page. A copy of your edit is available on the article’s edit history. If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.

AussieWikiDan ^(talk) 03:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox religion

Please gain consensus before you put back these dubious infoboxes. Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 09:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited La Liga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santander.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AppValley logo.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AppValley logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moses (given name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tut.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TheSoul Publishing

Hello, GOLDIEM J. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TheSoul Publishing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phoenician alphabet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian Hieroglyphs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Your recent editing history at Daniel (biblical figure) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 14:47, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sasebo slashing

Please aware there was no trustworthy media report when it comes to murder committed by minor in Japan.There was only rumor in anonymous board.To keep documenting certain person's name is very harmful.Please don't make edit war.Paperworkorange (talk) 04:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paperworkorange: thanks for letting me know🙏

No problem :) It's Japanese system.Sorry about my English though.Paperworkorange (talk) 09:45, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paperworkorange: Well, you certainly ain't doing bad.

Thanks! Paperworkorange (talk) 13:35, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Paperworkorange: Just a little tip for improving your English, you should add spaces after punctuation marks. I understand Japanese speakers probably aren't used to spaces😅

Oh, Thanks! Now I understand that's what my grammar app always trying to tell me! I didn't know what it means. Paperworkorange (talk) 09:27, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Free Guy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Twitch.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Demotic (Egyptian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian Hieroglyphs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at United 93 (film), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David J Johnson (talk) 08:23, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tamil script, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egyptian Hieroglyphs.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Short descriptions

Just FYI, according to wp:HOWTOSD, the wp:short description is limited to 40 characters. IMO, that is a stupidly small limit [the reason is sillier, so I won't bore you with it] and your edit to the SD at Swastika is another example of why it should be increased, because your clarification is essential to my eye. But others may enforce, so this is so you know what is going on. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 01:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@John Maynard Friedman: Oh bore me with it mate, I'm up for it.

A glutton for punishment. Here you go: Wikipedia talk:Short description/Archive 9#Length – 40 or 90 characters??. Short version: because iPhones. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! —It'sCtrlwiki • talk • 12:27, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notes

Your recent editing history suggests that you may be slipping out of the good habit of leaving edit notes. So this is a gentle nudge. No need to reply or acknowledge.--John Maynard Friedman (talk) 18:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hirohito

I have reverted your edits to this article; my edit summary points out why: It was easier to read previously; there is a discussion currently underway about moving the article, and the consensus appears to be that Hirohito is the better name; that being so, it should be the lead of the lead paragraph. Happy days ~ Lindsay^Hello 17:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tyrsenian languages

Your edit is tautological, since every language family is proposed, language family nomeclatures do not exist in nature. There are sources in the article that support the linguistic classification, and the Tyrrhenian language family now enjoys wide acceptance. --Tursclan (talk) 12:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Europe. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. If you continue suggesting that Europe is not a continent you are likely to be blocked. Thanks, Mathsci (talk) 19:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Academic consensus

Please read WP:RS/AC. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:27, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change sourced text to what you think it should say

As you did at Yahweh. Doug Weller talk 19:10, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angevin Empire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Geoffrey Plantagenet.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric ^talk 11:40, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wars of the Three Kingdoms, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Norman Conquest

Hi - if you look at that article, you will see a recent discussion about a move to the name you moved it to (with a slight variation in capitalisation). The proposal was rejected by consensus. Please do not make potentially controversial page moves (and it's safe to assume that moving any FA would be controversial) without first reading the talk page to see whether it has been discussed before, and starting a discussion if it hasn't already been discussed. Thank you. Girth Summit _(blether) 16:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Caution: do not change sourced text to what you think it should say

On 26 June 2022 you were asked "Please don’t change sourced text to what you think it should say" "As you did at Yahweh". You have now done this again at History of the Prophets and Kings. An editor with your level of experience here should not be doing that kind of thing anymore. Please check the sources next time before removing anything you think is incorrect. ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 12:39, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. Editors are expected to treat each other with respect and civility. On this encyclopedia project, editors assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Here is Wikipedia's welcome page, and it is hoped that you will assume the good faith of other editors and continue to help us improve Wikipedia! Thank you very much! Roman Reigns Fanboy (talk) 16:23, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to James II of England. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 12:26, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adding your own analysis is a violation of WP:NOR

This edit from three years ago added your own analysis to Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again. After that, you invited others to make the same mistake.[1]

Please don't add your own analysis, as it is a violation of WP:No original research. Binksternet (talk) 21:21, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Binksternet: And? You're saying that this edit, as in the one you've actually undone rather than what you've pointed me to, that was made two and a half years after my own faulty edit was undone was in any way influenced by mine? That is far too removed to identify any connection. Do you mind not pointing fingers, please? Furthermore, I've been editing Wikipedia for long enough since then to know that my edit that I made while still working things out here was not necessarily appropriate, and it was removed like a month after I made it. That was all three bloody years ago, as you've pointed out. So I'd advise you review a user's more recent activity if you want to decide whether or not to lecture them, if you don't mind. GOLDIEM J (talk) 22:27, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Binksternet (talk) 01:34, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Turkic Khaganate

Hello, I cannot see a problem with my edit that you reverted. The edit was to fix a date error of 2023-11 -> November 2023. The other changes were AWB general fixes, apart from one where |lang=en would be changed to |language=en which is pointless to indicating the language is English as it is the English Wikipedia. So I removed that altogether. Keith D (talk) 17:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith D: The aspect of your edit that came to my attention is that your edit removed the text "FIRST TURKIC KHAGANATE" as an image overlay and instead replaced it with the number three enclosed in brackets. ({{{3}}}) GOLDIEM J (talk) 18:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see the effect of {{{3}}} when I display the page. Presumably it is to do with the image in the infobox. It looks like AWB is trying to simplify links. Can I reapply & skip that change? Keith D (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Keith D: Go for it, see how it turns out. GOLDIEM J (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like someone else has made the date change. So will leave alone. Keith D (talk) 20:56, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accidental edit revert

Hey. Just wanted to apologize for undoing that whole edit. I genuinely forgot that there was more to the edit than the quotation change before I undid it. RyanAl6 (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RyanAl6 That's ok mate, take care x GOLDIEM J (talk) 00:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Cambial — foliar❧ 22:19, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Cambial — foliar❧ 22:22, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Federal subjects of Russia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Neveselbert. I noticed that you recently removed content from Margaret Thatcher without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

United States Electoral College edit

Hello. Your recent edit to the United States Electoral College article was not an improvement to the article. The version you changed was more precise in how the senators and representatives are "combined" by addition, and was more accurate in how the number of representatives is dependent on the census report rather than simply "proportional" which it is not. You did not include Edit Summary explaining how your version was an improvement. I have reverted it to the prior version. We can discuss it on my talk page if you want to. DocRuby (talk) 16:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@DocRuby: I mean not that the exact wording of the article really matters to me all that much, but have to ask how is "proportional" supposed to be inaccurate? GOLDIEM J (talk) 19:25, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the List of U.S. states and territories by population / State and territory rankings article section, sorting the table by population per seat. You'll see that the states census populations range from 542,113 (MT) through 989,948 (DE) per House seat, which is not proportional. Instead the apportionment is via a complex method described in the apportionment method article section that moves seats from one state to another when the relative census populations change, which grows disparities among states over time. DocRuby (talk) 20:45, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kingdom of England. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. The thread you started on the talk page had a response, if you want to reply to that. Belbury (talk) 18:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]