Jump to content

User talk:Neveselbert

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please help

[edit]

I saw you uploaded this image from trumanlibrary.gov to Commons with a very detailed full caption. Can you tell me if the image in this link can be uploaded to Commons? If so, what is the exact image copyright tag? A similar example is the photo in this link, which was also uploaded to Commons with the copyright tag PD-USGov, but I'm not sure if this is correct or not. Thank you.CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 15:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CalCoWSpiBudSu. I think that image should be fine over at Commons under {{PD-US-1978-89}}, but I would still advise double-checking with c:Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Best of luck, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:26, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok I got it, thanks. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]

You say there is no exception for "Dame" listed at MOS:PREFIX. You seem to be missing The honorific titles Sir, Dame, Lord and Lady are included in the initial reference and infobox heading for the subject of a biographical article, but are optional after that. The title is placed in bold in the first use of the name! -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Necrothesp. That's open to interpretation, and I would argue |honorific_prefix= can be considered part of the infobox heading. I'm inclined to interpret it that way. Thanks! ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 20:33, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
However, it makes absolutely no sense for the title to be bolded in the first line but not in the infobox! It looks utterly weird. That's my opinion. -- Necrothesp (talk) 09:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not necessarily, since "Dame" isn't a part of the article's title, either. I'm of the opinion that the |name= should match the title. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 16:25, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in a research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Important: Please update user script installation

[edit]

Hi there, you currently have a user script installed from Anne drew Andrew and Drew. Several weeks ago, I changed my username to Anne drew, and unfortunately, due to an issue with script redirects, the scripts you have installed under my old username no longer function.

To fix this, please update your JavaScript pages (Special:MyPage/common.js or Special:MyPage/skin.js) by replacing all instances of Anne drew Andrew and Drew with Anne drew.

If any of this is unclear, please ping Anne drew for help. I apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding!

Thanks – Anne drew

You are receiving this message because you have installed one of Anne drew's user scripts. If you'd like to stop receiving notifications, you can unsubscribe here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2024

[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).

Administrator changes

readded
removed

CheckUser changes

removed Maxim

Oversighter changes

removed Maxim

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Should Amess murder article be expanded with full details of attack?

[edit]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Murder_of_David_Amess&diff=prev&oldid=1218110186

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Murder_of_David_Amess#Should_this_article_reflect_trial_accounts_of_the_attack/Ali%E2%80%99s_behaviour?

I wonder if the murder article should be detailed more as to describe how the manner of it took place; it obviously does not need to be excessive but it is merely a suggestion. The phrase "suspect" is odd placed especially as the attacker did not dispute that he was the one responsible. It is unclear if Amess died quick or was left unconscious in the minutes after the attack but later accounts do suggest he was sadly already gone when paramedics reached him. 80.45.146.138 (talk) 21:26, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, IP! Murder of David Amess is free to edit, so feel free to add what you think necessary and I'll have a look. Thanks, ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 18:30, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]