User talk:Hilspress

Welcome!

Hi Hilspress! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! GPL93 (talk) 02:19, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hilspress

A tag has been placed on User:Hilspress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DFW FAA Brianvators (talk) 04:34, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, Hilspress is only a name and not own to any media platform or the like Hilspress (talk) 11:12, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User page

Sorry, but your user page does not conform to Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself and your Wikimedia-related activities. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV/resumé
a lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Thank you. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:31, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a user page, it's my username. I have not intention of whatsoever to go contrary to Wikipedia policies and copyright. Hilspress (talk) 21:11, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The issue is the content on your user page currently is being used as one would use the main space or draft space. You may want to check out Help:Your first article. GPL93 (talk) 22:00, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Amuda people, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 23:01, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello the citations were there Hilspress (talk) 09:15, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did Hilspress (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Unreliable Sources at Miss Nigeria

Hey Hilspress, I reverted the edits you made to Miss Nigeria because you added links to unreliable sources such as google and wikipedia. Kindly see WP:RS. Thank you. Princess of Ara_(talk) 12:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Okey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Peter Okey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Chirota (talk) 01:24, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Okey (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not currently demonstrate that the subject can pass the notability guidelines; in particular WP:NPOL. There is no indication that his medical / research career could gain him notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Okey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Okey, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hilspress! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Eagleash (talk) 02:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hilspress

A tag has been placed on User:Hilspress, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:57, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ode Ntezi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ode Ntezi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:12, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Ode Ntezi

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ode Ntezi. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:Ode Ntezi. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:Ode Ntezi. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:Ode Ntezi|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Your previous attempt at publishing this was draftified for being unreferenced. Please do not create more copies of the same; work on the existing draft, instead, until it is ready for publishing. Thank you. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iduma igariwey moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Iduma igariwey, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon 03:39, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Simon Ekpa moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Simon Ekpa, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 12:14, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Ekpa (July 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Simon Ekpa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Simon Ekpa, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:58, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Okey

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Okey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ode Ntezi

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ode Ntezi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iduma igariwey

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iduma igariwey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Simon Ekpa

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Simon Ekpa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ode Ntezi

Hello, Hilspress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ode Ntezi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:30, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iduma igariwey

Hello, Hilspress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iduma igariwey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:43, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Simon Ekpa

Hello, Hilspress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Simon Ekpa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okpoto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Okpoto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:35, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hon. Ademorin Aliu Kuye.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Hon. Ademorin Aliu Kuye.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:30, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kenneth Ogbodo

Hello, Hilspress

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Yeeno, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kenneth Ogbodo, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yeeno}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yeeno (talk) 00:53, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hon. Ademorin Aliu Kuye.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hon. Ademorin Aliu Kuye.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Vladlen Manilov ✉ / 08:01, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kenneth Ogbodo

A tag has been placed on Kenneth Ogbodo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mvqr (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Francis Onwugamba

The article Francis Onwugamba has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Shirt58 (talk) 11:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donald Chukwu

A tag has been placed on Donald Chukwu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 11:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Donald Chukwu

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Donald Chukwu, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Itcouldbepossible ^Talk 11:39, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Okpoto

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Okpoto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Philip Obin

The article Philip Obin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:20, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Ifeoma Okafor-Obi. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 16:40, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Hilspress. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ifeoma Okafor-Obi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Hilspress. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Hilspress|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Rsjaffe, Thank you for your submission. However, the Wikipedia page Ifeoma Okafor-Obi is not a paid editing and there is no financial contract with the owner of the page, neither are they aware that such page are being created one their behalf. The page is about a biography of a prominent humanitarian who have impacted her community and applied human capital development in my region. She is a prominent person and to my best of knowledge, matches the Wikipedia list of prominent people. In the page also, most of the citation used are from secondary independent sources, including online news publications. The page is still under construction as I have applying Thank you for your submission and support.

Thank you for your response. I am puzzled, however, by the photograph. How did you obtain that? Looks quite professional.— rsjaffe 🗣️ 14:52, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond to this question. You stated that the photo was your own work, but it does not appear to be so. At the least, tappearssto be is a copyright issue. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 17:05, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Goodmorning Jsjaffe, I owe a journalistic right to the photo, it was collectively collected from our online Journal. Though it has also been used in other publications due to the age of the photography Hilspress (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please review Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials and make sure you follow the instructions there to properly license those photographs you use. Claiming “own work” as you currently do is incorrect. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 21:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear rsjaffe,

The photograph has been properly licenced in accordance to donation of copyright materials.

Regards. Hilspress (talk) 12:58, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and verifiability

I've had to undo your three good faith edits to Stab-in-the-back myth because of basic sourcing issues. Please read about Wikipedia's policy on WP:Verifiability, and the use of citations to WP:Reliable sources. The latter does not include blogs or anything that is self-published. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me, or you can ask questions about editing Wikipedia at the WP:Help desk. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 10:49, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ifeoma Okafor-Obi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ifeoma Okafor-Obi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifeoma Okafor-Obi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

scope_creep^Talk 12:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ifeoma Okafor-Obi. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 12:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ifeoma Okafor-Obi

A tag has been placed on Ifeoma Okafor-Obi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ifeoma Okafor-Obi. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:18, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Deb (talk) 16:01, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ifeoma Okafor-Obi

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Ifeoma Okafor-Obi, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:04, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Proten International

A tag has been placed on Proten International requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. KH-1 (talk) 00:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ifeoma Okafor-Obi (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ifeoma Okafor-Obi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Effium, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal Democracy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Aboriginal Democracy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. In addition, please read WP:NOTESSAY.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:18, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mayolee

The article Mayolee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. // Timothy :: talk 04:41, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Major improvements has been made on the post, and other reliable third-party sources that addresses the subject has been made as well. Thank you. Hilspress (talk) 06:56, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mayolee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayolee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayolee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

// Timothy :: talk 20:22, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kola Oyeneyin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First Bank. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kola Oyeneyin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kola Oyeneyin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And despite the WP:CITEBOMBing, it currently doesn't have any. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:19, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your observations, but I do think that the page has many reliable secondary sources that are independent. These sources have wide coverages on the notability of the biography in Nigeria, coupled with having been nominated and appointed into the government, an event that drew some awareness hence covered by the mainstream media platforms in Nigeria. Hillarys (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hilspress/Abraham David

A tag has been placed on Hilspress/Abraham David requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 01:10, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for you observation. I kindly request that the page be moved back to draft. Regards Hillarys (talk) 08:46, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hilspress. Unfortunately your article has been deleted, so you need to make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. You may also want to directly contact the deleting administrator on their talk page and request that the article be restored as a draft. Regards, Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 17:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abraham David

A tag has been placed on Abraham David requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:07, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your observation Liz. Please I would want the page to be retrieved and be move to draft. Regards Hillarys (talk) 08:51, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hilspress

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Hilspress requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bright Nwanne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third Republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aboriginal Democracy in Nigeria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aboriginal Democracy in Nigeria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aboriginal Democracy in Nigeria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:19, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ifeoma Okafor-Obi

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ifeoma Okafor-Obi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Hilspress. Thank you for your work on Ugochukwu Uba. User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:42, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello [[MPGuy2824]], thank you . Hillarys (talk) 16:11, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hilspress (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

disruption of editing

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Hi team, regretfully I was blocked as a result of violation of Wikipedia policy which involves sockpuppetry and vandalism. I am really sorry for my misconduct and pleading that I will never do it again. I have gone through the Wikipedia policy and I henceforth promise that I will make productive contributions instead. Thank you. ~~~~}} Hillarys (talk) 23:59, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aboriginal Democracy moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aboriginal Democracy. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because this neologism needs additional sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 07:42, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Emeka Okwuosa

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Emeka Okwuosa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unlock Hilspress

I humble request for your mercy as I also use this means to pledge for your consideration. I have been blocked for over 10 months. Kindly unlock me so I could participate back as a good editor and Wikipedian. I have gone through all the WG and other policies of Wikipedia, and I understand that I was guilty. My previous actions were motivated by ignorance of how Wikipedia works. Noq, I understand the process quite well, and will continue to uphold to the standards of Wikipedia. Kindly help me unlock the account so I could edit once more. Thank you.

Beat regards. Hillarys (talk) 15:00, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How do you figure you have been blocked for 10 months? —C.Fred (talk) 15:11, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oshara

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oshara, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Emeka Okwuosa

Hello, Hilspress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Emeka Okwuosa".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kola Oyeneyin

Hello, Hilspress. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kola Oyeneyin, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kola Oyeneyin

Hello, Hilspress. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kola Oyeneyin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]