User talk:HappyMauritius

This is HappyMauritius's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ramesh Awatarsing (March 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ramesh Awatarsing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ramesh Awatarsing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HappyMauritius! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:27, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Hello, I'm Merlin04atschool. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of radio stations in Mauritius have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Merlin04atschool (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HappyMauritius (May 14)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:47, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTV (Mauritius) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, BTV (Mauritius), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:41, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BTV (Mauritius) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BTV (Mauritius). Thanks! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 12:42, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roshi Bhadain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Minister and And (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BTV (Mauritius) (June 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bkissin was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at MBC Digital 4 instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Existing article just needs a rename to the new name above. However, CASSIOPEIA's comments still apply. Two sentences does not make a quality Wikipedia article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BTV (Mauritius) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BTV (Mauritius), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 18:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kirti Choudhary

The article Kirti Choudhary has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of satisfying either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 18:30, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Avi Gopee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Avi Gopee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 17:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mauritius Broadcasting Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Best FM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shalini Runnoo (July 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Worldbruce was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shalini Runnoo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shalini Runnoo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Worldbruce (talk) 22:26, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Urvashi Gooriah has been accepted

Urvashi Gooriah, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dial911 (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bessika Bucktawor has been accepted

Bessika Bucktawor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 16:48, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Sandeep Maheshwari

Hello HappyMauritius.The Title of the new article you created On Sandeep Maheswari is incorrect.It seems you put an extra i because you were not allowed to create the article with exact title — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Seeker of Truth (talk • contribs) 09:25, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello A Seeker of Truth, I have created the article Sandeep Maheshwari as it have enough notables articles, I did notify the administrator on his talk page to move/rename the this page to the original one, if need be to delete; I apologise if there is any mistakes on my end. Can you please advise, if the page is worthy for inclusion or if there is not enough press articles to support the required Sandeep Maheshwari page...please advise, thank you...?

Nomination of 100% Citoyens (Mauritius) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 100% Citoyens (Mauritius) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/100% Citoyens (Mauritius) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 05:21, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sandeep Maheshwarii for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandeep Maheshwarii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Maheshwarii until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ∯WBG^converse 17:32, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Serenity Gate

It is not remotely clear to me what you were doing with these edits. Serenity Gate (Mauritius) has nothing to do with Serenity (2019 film) as far as I can see. I have reverted your edits. --Yamla (talk) 15:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. I see the connection. Okay. You are welcome to reintroduce your edits if you wish, though Serenity Gate (Mauritius) currently needs a lot of work and a lot more appropriate sourcing. --Yamla (talk) 15:02, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:BTV (Mauritius) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:BTV (Mauritius), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:26, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Avi Gopee concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Avi Gopee, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Shalini Runnoo concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Shalini Runnoo, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Abeydhanand Beejan

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Abeydhanand Beejan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BTV (Mauritius)

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BTV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 13:00, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Avi Gopee

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avi Gopee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 17:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Radio Plus (Mauritius), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Plus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius)

The article TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of significance

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BDO Mauritius

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BDO Mauritius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lopifalko (talk) 17:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shalini Runnoo

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Shalini Runnoo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 09:29, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Siza Roy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Siza Roy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siza Roy

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Siza Roy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. kingboyk (talk) 18:55, 9 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal Awatarsing

I wasn't the one who prevented creation, so I wouldn't be willing to enable it without a discussion at deletion review first. Normally I'd suggest you create a draft at Draft:Kushal Awatarsing to demonstrate that it meets the usual inclusion criterion, but even that was once deleted Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Kushal Awatarsing and its' creation prevented. So, this is a toughie. I suspect you're gunning for the impossible, but if you're truly gung-ho, I suggest you find three very good sources, and present them at Deletion Review to get an endorsement on unprotecting the Draft. Wily D 13:20, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WilyD, I understand, I really regret that. I would better follow your instructions and try to improve on gathering more notable sources and then propose to review at deletion Review. Thanks for your advice Willy, i appreciate it. HappyMauritius (talk) 14:08, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a tough situation when an article has been spammed in the past, it creates a lot of negative priors on it. So, best not to waste any more time than necessary. I don't love the use of WP:THREE, but I think it accurately reflects the attitudes one is likely to encounter. Cheers, Wily D 15:03, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yanish Engutsamy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radio Plus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anupma Singh moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anupma Singh, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 17:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anupma Singh (June 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MapleSoy were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

It'd be helpful to say at least a little more about what makes this subject notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anupma Singh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anupma Singh, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MapleSoy (talk) 05:10, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Avi Gopee moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Avi Gopee, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

The above is boilerplate. This isn't. There is absolutely no showing whatsoever of notability. The 3 sources I sampled didn't even mention the subject of the article. John from Idegon (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vrushali Chavan (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vrushali Chavan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vrushali Chavan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mauritian Reality Shows has been nominated for renaming

Category:Mauritian Reality Shows has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 02:29, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Harshani Mahadoo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harshani Mahadoo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harshani Mahadoo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - The9Man ^(Talk) 07:25, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Mauritian Radio Personalities has been nominated for renaming

Category:Mauritian Radio Personalities has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fuddle (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anupma Singh

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anupma Singh".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:19, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vrushali Chavan

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vrushali Chavan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:16, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Avi Gopee

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Avi Gopee".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 09:52, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vrushali Chavan

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vrushali Chavan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:34, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sherry Singh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sherry Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sherry Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kili Paul moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kili Paul, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 12:35, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kushal Awatarsing

I don't think it'd be a problem to unprotect the page for a draft; the previous draft was created by a banned user and possibly by the subject, so I think it's best to start any draft completely from scratch. Wily D 13:28, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@WilyD: Thank you so much can you please proceed with unprotection so that i can start working on it from scratch. HappyMauritius (talk) 11:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You should be able to create a draft now. Wily D 21:21, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @WilyD. HappyMauritius (talk) 07:33, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kushal Awatarsing (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Idoghor Melody was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kushal Awatarsing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kushal Awatarsing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 11:45, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kili Paul (January 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kili Paul and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kili Paul, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:41, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Polyeco moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Polyeco, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ehraz Ahmed for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ehraz Ahmed is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ehraz Ahmed (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 07:15, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 18:32, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HappyMauritius (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I totally understand why i was blocked, and i promise not to make same mistake again. I will in the future make sure to review all required informations, news articles, writing style and reliable sources before working on an article. Could you please unblock me so that i can continue to contribute with all the required rules as mentioned within Wikipedia guidelines. Thank you, HappyMauritius (talk) 20:57, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Stale unblock. You can make a new one if you want. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:19, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please list all of the articles you have created and, for each one, specify whether or not you were paid for working on those articles, and by whom. I'm meaning this in the broad sense. If you were an employee of any of these companies, even an intern, that would count. This page can help you come up with your list. Please also tell us how you would adhere to WP:COI and WP:PROMO going forward and what you would work on, now that you know you won't be unblocked to continue advertising/spamming. --Yamla (talk) 21:07, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree should have been more careful while addressing an already discussed deleted article and promise to go through the required guidelines and cross verify all news articles and sources before proceeding to submit for review for any article that i would be creating in the future.

I apologise for the mistake done, and understand that I need to go through all the required guidelines including notability, verifying sources and going through WP:COI and WP:PROMO and all other guidelines before submitting an article for review. I mostly create articles based on Mauritius and Mauritian personalities, it was my first time trying to edit an article outside of what i normally create, and i understand and realise that i need take double precautions before proceeding to edit any articles especially if it has already been adddressed at deletion review earlier. HappyMauritius (talk) 21:42, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you indicating you were paid to create those 26 articles? You haven't been clear on this point. Which articles were you paid to create, and by whom? Why on earth haven't you gone through WP:COI and WP:PROMO yet, given that you've been blocked? We expect you to do so before requesting an unblock, so please do so immediately and let us know how you plan to adhere to them, and whether or not you plan to continue creating articles for payment. Why are you talking about articles that have gone through deletion review, when that's not really relevant to your block? --Yamla (talk) 21:47, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For that matter, are you explicitly okay with us deleting all the articles you have created in violation of WP:COI and/or WP:UPE? --Yamla (talk) 21:48, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Planet FM (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Wazaa FM (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Jardin Balfour (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Reform Party (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Parti Malin (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Roshi Bhadain - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

MBC 3 (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Hamari Bahu Silk - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Shakeel Mohamed - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Urvashi Gooriah - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Bessika Bucktawor - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Plateforme Militante (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Sandra Mayotte - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Subhasnee - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

TikTok Awards Night (Mauritius) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Yanish Engutsamy - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Lockdown in Mauritius - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Patrick Assirvaden - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Lockdown Island - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Brandon Spinelly - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Rishon Bhadain - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Bruneau Laurette - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

C'est La Vie (Mauritian TV Series) - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Guillaume Domingue - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Darren L'activiste - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article.

Dev Sunnasy - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. HappyMauritius (talk) 21:50, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This list is not complete. Additionally, you will need to address what is wrong with (many/most of) these articles. --Yamla (talk) 21:56, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kili Paul - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. I started writing about this person as he is widely known worldwide for his videos, sources available does not meet notability hence was rejected.

Polyeco - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. Is a company involved in the Wakashio incident in the indian ocean. It does not meet notability and needs more reliable sources before it's accepted.

Sherry Singh - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He is the ceo of Mauritius Telecom, since being ceo is not enough for inclusion in wikipedia, it needs more reliable sources before it's accepted.

Avi Gopee - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He is a mauritian radio personality, since there not much article speaking about the subject it needs more references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.

Ehraz Ahmed I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. He has mostly promotional articles and is not yet ready to be accepted, it has only once source aljazeera which is acceptable and still needs more reliable sources for it to be accepted.

Anupma Singh - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.

BDO Mauritius - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. BDO already has a main page company and BDO mauritius is not needed for a separate page.

Vrushali Chavan - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.

Harshani Mahadoo - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. She does not have enough references and reliable sources, before it's accepted.

Draft: Kushal Awatarsing - I have not been paid by anyone or any company to write this article. There's only mentions in article about the subject it needs more references and reliable sources, before it's accepted. HappyMauritius (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kili Paul (July 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Akevsharma was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Akevsharma (talk) 01:12, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Kili Paul

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Kili Paul, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Akevsharma (talk) 01:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Hello, HappyMauritius. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but a page you created Draft:Kili Paul has been deleted as meeting one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects of articles must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources which are unconnected with the subject and which provide verifiable information. Someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see WP:CORP for subjects that are groups or companies or organizations. Please see WP:ANYBIO for subjects who are people.

Also, encyclopedia articles must be neutral in tone and not use language that promotes or advocates for a subject, or tries to cast the subject in a favorable light. Please see User:Deepfriedokra/promo for examples of content to avoid. Sometimes creators of promotional/advocational content are bewildered that it is considered such. If one has been trained to write such content, or if one has spent some time writing such content, one may simply be blind to non-neutral phrases or styles.

A common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc.

CV's/resumé's are by their nature promotional. Writing about oneself or any connected subject is discouraged as the connection can make objectivity difficult. Information on avoiding advocational content and common pitfalls is here and here, however be aware that these are not exhaustive.

New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat

Deepfriedokra (talk) 10:38, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dev Sunnasy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dev Sunnasy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:01, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dev Sunnasy

Hello, HappyMauritius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dev Sunnasy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lockdown in Mauritius

The article Lockdown in Mauritius has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Questionable notability, unreliable sources, and I can't find anything about it on google.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Born25121642 (talk) 08:11, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Polyeco

Hello, HappyMauritius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Polyeco, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Polyeco

Hello, HappyMauritius. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Polyeco".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]