User talk:Born25121642

Welcome!

Hi Born25121642! I noticed your contributions to Legal status of transgender people and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Dronebogus (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Born25121642 (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! I like all your userboxes. Born25121642 (talk) 23:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently been editing gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated a contentious topic. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;

comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;

follow editorial and behavioural best practice;

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:06, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Born25121642 (talk) 04:07, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I figured you would. You are famously a genius, after all! Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 04:10, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 6:6:6, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Merrick. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamada grammar

This is not a Wikipedia page, it should be deleted or replaced by a redirect. Please add something. Xx236 (talk) 11:37, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yamada Yoshio ha s a similar problem, you may help the page to survive.Xx236 (talk) 11:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I Added some content. Born25121642 (talk) 11:43, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Tunisia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:00, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I added a talk page notice about this. Born25121642 (talk) 07:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the link.

Talk:Climate in Tunisia Born25121642 (talk) 07:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Born25121642, that's very good for the Talk page, and it helps editors, so thanks for that, and good job formatting the {{copied}} template, which isn't always that simple, especially for new editors. On the other hand, it isn't sufficient, because Wikipedia's WP:Terms of use require something in the edit summary that mentions, and links, to the original article where you copied the material from. Since you missed that the first time around when you copied it, you'll have to do it retrospectively. Have a look at Repairing insufficient attribution, and see if that makes sense to you. If not, you can ask for further help at Wikipedia:Help desk, or you can {{reply}} below and ask me, or you can contact me at my Talk page (about this, or anything else). Welcome to Wikipedia, and I hope you stick around! Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 08:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok I think I did it. Born25121642 (talk) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You did it just fine. This is something that can trip up editors with much more experience than you, and you did it just right. I think you have every potential to be a really good editor, here, and I look forward to your contributions, and your progress. Feel free to contact me on my Talk page about anything, any time, if you feel stuck, or just have a question. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 11:06, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Paul Acker is a very good article. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 04:39, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Born25121642 (talk) 12:30, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hintersee (Ramsauer Ache) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hintersee (Ramsauer Ache), is not suitable as written to remain published. While it appears to be notable, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. There are large sections which are wholly uncited. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or feel free to ping me to take another look.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:09, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hintersee (Ramsauer Ache)

Hello Born25121642,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hintersee (Ramsauer Ache) for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Hintersee (Ramsauer Ache) to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:33, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok, I had no idea! Whoops! Born25121642 (talk) 04:38, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Edacheril moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Charles Edacheril, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:07, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chip Troiano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Austrian Society for Geomechanics moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Austrian Society for Geomechanics, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Charles Edacheril

Hello, Born25121642. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charles Edacheril, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.