User talk:Gregbard

Current time: Thursday, November 21, 2024, 12:44 (UTC)

Archives

navbox

Hi, i work on a navbox for ways of obtaining science in two related field, scientific method from philosophy of science and dikw pyramid from information science. i need help of some people like you to finsh this,

you can see a prototype of navbox in my sand box: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:KPU0/sandbox Plutonium 14:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Update

I am doing some research into the issues arising from my edits which cause this block. In particular, I will be studying Wikipedia:Copyrights, and Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. I will also be making some other inquiries so that I might understand these issues better. Apparently, several unsuccessful attempts to unblock could result in a block of my ability to edit this talk page, so I am proceeding more slowly and carefully (although that particular element of the appeals process is very questionable as to its necessity and basic fairness.)

I also just want to state for the record that the preceding comment titled "Fifth Pilar" was not made by myself. I have never edited Wikipedia under any account, including by using anonymous IP accounts, other than "User:Gregbard" which is my real name. It does makes me feel better in this troubling time for me that someone apparently wanted to make a point on my behalf. I don't think the people supporting this block will find that it compels their conscience, however, because the fact that "Every past version of a page is saved" only contributes to their concerns. Their other point about upholding the "spirit" of the policies is an excellent one, and I think this particular case should serve to bring that point into sharp relief. Perhaps in considering that point, someone's conscience will thus be compelled.

I still feel that although, strictly speaking, an administrator is able to justify blocking me given particular edits made by myself and the content of the policies, that this particular case would have been better handled by communicating with me in a civil manner. I believe the evidence and my long standing and prolific contributions support that view. The situation could have been handled much less heavy-handedly. I will get back to you a formal appeal at some point soon, and with the findings of my research. Greg Bard (talk) 19:33, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure you want that last paragraph there? It's enough for me to remove talkpage access, in part because it shows that you do NOT understand your block whatsoever, and are simply railing on against a policy that a) you agreed to, b) that is not optional, and c) you were well aware of the panda ₯’ 19:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As I have stated, I am currently doing research, so if it seems as though it is the policy that I do not understand, then please forgive and withhold judgment and action until I make my formal request with my findings. The last statement is not a formal part of any formal appeal. The claim that the administrator who blocked me, and those who supported her could have just communicated with me civilly doesn't actually support the conclusion that I either understand, or do not understand the policy in any way. All that it means is that administratively, they had a choice, and chose a very heavy-handed approach. Please do not confuse political considerations for judicial ones. I have stated that "an administrator is able to justify blocking me given particular edits made by myself and the content of the policies" so that actually supports the conclusion that I do understand that a policy has been breached by myself. I am going the extra mile here by going through a more extensive study of the policies. I am finding the environment to be extremely authoritarian, if you can't appreciate that distinction. Greg Bard (talk) 20:06, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The "suggestion" an accusation is that you were not dealt with politely and civilly - which is patently false, and thus a personal attack. Hence, rethink that paragraph - those who make personal attacks against others - including the blocking admin - get the pleasure of having their talkpage access revoked. Your choice here: refactor, or I'll remove it for you ... and if I have to remove it, I'll remove talkpage access as well. the panda ₯’ 20:32, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, don't pile on here. I haven't always had the best interactions with Greg, but there's no need to go looking for slights you have to infer. --Trovatore (talk) 20:55, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The "suggestion" an accusation is that you were not dealt with politely and civilly - which is patently false, and thus a personal attack." — That is emphatically not a personal attack. Please restore talk page access. Carrite (talk) 00:16, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, read WP:WIAPA Tim. Also, you know as well as I do that Greg's talkpage access has not been rescinded. the panda ₯’ 00:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's enough for me to remove talkpage access No, you would-be totalitarian disgrace to the admin corps, it is not. — Scott • talk 14:56, 19 June 2014 (UTC) (No stake in this issue, have never encountered Gregbard before, saw this discussion mentioned over at Wikipediocracy.)[reply]

Just chiming in that there is one possibility that Greg could consider in the interim. Over at wikisource:User:John Carter I have a freaking huge listing of reference works currently in the public domain which as of a 1986 guide to reference works were still considered in some way useful and valuable. Pretty much by definition, the articles from those sources can be copied word for word with proper attribution. Admittedly, in several cases, they will also be outdated (big surprise), but for a lot of articles about, for instance, medieval political figures, defunct states, and the like, they can be very useful. John Carter (talk) 22:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even if you are blocked here you should still be able to go over to wikisource and starting either proofreading pages from works which have already been added or uploading files that aren't there yet and proofreading and separating out content into individual articles. Some of the artices from Encyclopedia Britannica and some of the other reference sources would be very easily transormed into article content here. John Carter (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gregbard, the above is a great idea. Lest there be some bizarre understanding of my comments above, my goal has been to try and get you to NOT say something that would lower the chances of this block removed. I have tried to invite you to rethink your strategy, and then remove posts that are unproven accusations. Your future unblock - and I'm sure it will occur - would take those comments into account, and personally I'd rather not see them negatively affect your request. I understand that you believe that you were dealt with in an uncivil manner, but my reading of the history of this talkpage doesn't show that - and trust me, I'm often accused of being on the aggressive side of civility enforcement. Nevertheless, your goal is (or should be) to move forward. In any unblock request you need to do 2 things: a) understand what led to the block, and b) show a "way forward". Doing positive work elsewhere is always a plus - indeed, it used to be a requirement of the standard offer.

As far as I know, there's nobody on the project who wants you permanently gone - "indefinite" does not equal "infinite" - it means "until the community is convinced that the behaviour that led to the block will not recur. Obviously, this starts with the 2 elements of an unblock noted above - especially awareness. If there are elements of your interaction with the blocking admin that I'm unaware of that has you concerned about civility, let me know (including diff's) - otherwise, I recommend you drop that strategy, and focus on your way forward. Cheers the panda ₯’ 22:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look, Greg did not in fact assert that anyone had treated him uncivilly. You chose to pull that inference out of his remarks, and it's entirely possible that he did mean to suggest it, but he did not say it. He certainly did not say that anyone in particular had done so. That makes "personal attack" a pretty big stretch, in my opinion (you can't personally attack an unspecified person). --Trovatore (talk) 19:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And you know, honestly, even this is not really the most important point here, though I think it's enough by itself. Here's the real key thing: Suppose for the sake of argument that Greg had accused a specific person, say Moonriddengirl, of being "uncivil". He didn't, but just suppose.

That cannot possibly be what is meant by the line about "accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence" in WP:WIAPA. That's for cases where someone has alleged facts not in evidence. Here there is no dispute about the facts, just their interpretation. If you can't even make a controversial characterization of the facts, that's effectively the same as saying you can't complain about actions that have been taken. That can't possibly be the intent. --Trovatore (talk) 03:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to allow Greg to continue with wikiproject philosophy and category upkeep if he agreed not to add (or draft) any content whatsoever pending the ongoing assessment?—Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 02:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

...And template editing.—Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 14:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The concept of civility in WP is freely and wildly and inconsistently interpreted by blocking admins, as per whatever agenda they have at the moment. Admins can be stunningly rude, and post incredibly malicious attacks, but that's OK, and gets a pass, as long as they are worded in honey-language; whereas some random joke involving a swear-word results in long-winded, insane arguments and bans. The entire concept of civility in WP should be abandoned; over they years, its clearly shown itself to be unworkable. Why is it still a thing? How is it that we have still not reformed the admin cadre's in WP? The system is broken, it needs fixing, its over-due. 84.15.181.100 (talk) 05:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is Greg still blocked or did he settle his differences? — Philogos (talk) 21:44, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Philogo, I am still blocked. I have chosen not to use my second appeal since my first one did not immediately reinstate me. I still don't feel like putting effort into a big discussion about getting unblocked, and I don't really have the time for it. Perhaps at some point soon I will get back into it. I see that many things have deteriorated since I left. Greg Bard (talk) 17:35, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophy maintenance categories

Category:Philosophy maintenance categories, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:43, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Gregbard will we need these??? —Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 14:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pundit pivot

The article Pundit pivot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 12:32, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:InPhO-logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:InPhO-logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:David Gregg, Jr.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:David Gregg, Jr.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:42, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Mary Beth McDonald.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Mary Beth McDonald.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 07:59, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kelly, I corresponded with the clerk of the City of Vero Beach via email, explaining to her that I needed images for Wikipedia. She sent me a source which I clipped into the various ones you see at List of mayors of Vero Beach, Florida. I forwarded that email to the permissions address, and I also sent a request to the clerk for a more formal statement. That really should suffice. I am currently blocked from doing anything else about this issue. Please do follow up on this issue and take steps to prevent any unjustified and unfounded deletion. Greg Bard (talk) 20:48, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greg when ya coming back? You do know that unfortunately, YOU cannot send that release of the images, the owner does...the project needs you back; when's it going to happen? the panda ₯’ 21:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The images were requested specifically requested for Wikipedia, and they were sent. They are public documents provided by a municipal officer. I have, in response to this issue, forwarded both emails to the permissions email address. I have also requested that the City Clerk in question forward a more formalized statement to "permissions."

In answer to your other question I have my own: Why should I come back?! I don't expect appreciation, but I also don't deserve to be criminalized. If I am needed so much they should lift the block on their own with my aforementioned statements on the matter having satisfied them. At some point I will make a new request to consider an unblock and make a statement concerning the copyright policy expressing that I have read and understand it. However, I am unable to accept that a block was ever necessary in any way. A simple discussion of the matter would have accomplished more progress on the very issue which it is claimed was the justification for the block, AND it would not have interfered with the many other ways in which I contribute. Just because a policy permits for an action, does not mean that the action should be done. So my question on that issue is 'what exactly has been accomplished by this action?" Greg Bard (talk) 21:53, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greg, if this was "criminalization" it would be very different, wouldn't it? Wikipedia's requirements for image permissions are strict, for a reason. You don't like those requirements, but you agreed to them. Indeed, nobody asked you to like them. I don't like driving only 100km/h on my local highway, but I agreed to it when I got my license to drive. The best way to change the rules is NOT to keep going against them but to try to get them changed. It may not be successful, but the old thing about the best part about banging your head against the wall is how good it feels when you stop really comes to mind. You may not expect appreciation, but I and others do appreciate what you can bring. The block was a very unfortunate, but clearly required action - it cannot be lifted without a WP:GAB-compliant request. People DID try to talk to you, but as you state again and again, you disagree with the Wikipedia rules. Well, that's a painful wall, isn't it? the panda ₯’ 22:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

We don't agree. Your philosophy of administration is extreme authoritarianism, and it has no place in an open community which claims to respect civility. There is nothing "clear" about the necessity of this block, as all of the problems which it sought to address could also have been addressed without the block. Nor am I "banging [my] head" about anything. You don't seem to be paying very close attention to my claims and are hearing what you want to hear. I agree that a copyright policy should exist, and sanctions should be provided for instances where there aren't a dozen other less intrusive ways to address the problem. My case just isn't close to that. It isn't the policy I have any problem with, it's the administration of the policy. Just because a policy permits for an action, does not mean that the action should be done. So my question --- again --- on that issue is 'what exactly has been accomplished by this action?" I was even in the process of addressing some of the issues myself when I was blocked! What kind of sense does that make?!?! I'm sorry panda, but we do not agree on philosophy of administration, at all. Extreme authoritarianism has no place in ANY administration, much less an open community like Wikipedia. It just basic respect for the people who are volunteering. Greg Bard (talk) 22:23, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If "authoritarianism" means "respecting the authority of the rules agreed to by the community", then sure. Every single community has rules and norms that are either defined by the community, or are inflicted on the community: no commune exists in a vacuum. The real issue would be if the rules of the community were applied differently to some people than to others (4 legs good, 2 legs bad comes to mind here). Indeed, if you were blocked while we let others get away, then you'd have a valid argument for complaint.

When it comes to images, Wikipedia respects the rule of Copyright Law - it has no choice - it's inflicted on us. We cannot say "we disagree" and flaunt it - we have to respond to the higher authority on this. The community may not like it, but it has nevertheless agreed to a process for ensuring that the Law is maintained, and for ensuring submissions meet whatever various aspect of that law.

You cannot be a member of a community, but fail to follow the processes agreed-to by the community. You cannot perform actions that run contrary to rules that are inflicted on the community, or you create risk for the community as a whole. That's not Wikipedia's fault. We, as members, don't get to choose which "rules" we follow, and which ones we don't. The concept of "open" or "free" does not work that way anywhere, even in theoretical bounds the panda ₯’ 22:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think we have exhausted the usefulness of this discussion. We don't agree on philosophy. You are introducing irrelevant issues into it all over the map. Given my vast experience and education, I really have to claim that it is more my proper role to be educating you on matters of due process and working within the policies of a volunteer non-profit community, not the other way around. You have already shown poor judgment on these matters given your readiness to block my access to this talk page. Thank you for your efforts, but I would strongly suggest you work contributing in other areas of Wikipedia than administration. Be well. Greg Bard (talk) 18:44, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dispositional beliefs

Category:Dispositional beliefs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020, Talk 04:26, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Middle orthodoxy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Middle orthodoxy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Middle orthodoxy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ReformedArsenal (talk) 02:22, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Metatheory of religion

Category:Metatheory of religion, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Editor2020, Talk 03:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christian Swartz-sig.xcf listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Christian Swartz-sig.xcf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Reticulated Spline ^{(t • c)} 23:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophy reference resources

Category:Philosophy reference resources, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edwin Adams (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edwin Adams (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edwin Adams (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dudley Ely for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dudley Ely is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dudley Ely until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:43, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Walter C. Quintard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Walter C. Quintard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Walter C. Quintard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Florida Philosophical Association

The article Florida Philosophical Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William 02:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phil-sources

Template:Phil-sources has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:50, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Life Is Real Only Then, When 'I Am'#Consensus check

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Life Is Real Only Then, When 'I Am'#Consensus check. Tom Ruen (talk) 00:23, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Noesis (online journal) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Noesis (online journal) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noesis (online journal) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guy (Help!) 20:01, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:County fire departments in the United States

Category:County fire departments in the United States, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (talk) 22:43, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:County fire departments in Virginia

Category:County fire departments in Virginia, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Zackmann08 (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Kuhn

The article Steven Kuhn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 18:26, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concepts by field

Category:Concepts by field, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Religious philosophical concepts

Category:Religious philosophical concepts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concepts in ethics

Category:Concepts in ethics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Fitch table tomb.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Fitch table tomb.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Gregbard/Template:WikiProject Skepticism/test

User:Gregbard/Template:WikiProject Skepticism/test, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gregbard/Template:WikiProject Skepticism/test and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gregbard/Template:WikiProject Skepticism/test during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:34, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

Dear Greg, I realize that you've been absent from Wikipedia for a while, but I would like to begin moving your User space drafts to Draft space. Let me know here if you have any objection, either generally, or specific to any particular draft. Cheers! bd2412 T 12:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. Greg Bard (talk) 13:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks. bd2412 T 00:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know if there are any namespace drafts you would particularly like moved or deleted. bd2412 T 02:48, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quite frankly, I prefer if everything was left alone. But if someone wants to develop anything, I wouldn't stand in the way of that. Greg Bard (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would be interested in seeing the articles in question. Where are they now user: BD2412? Thanks in advance, Ottawahitech (talk) 20:28, 1 January 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Matthew Sention

Draft:Matthew Sention, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Matthew Sention and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Matthew Sention during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Talk archive/philosophy

Template:Talk archive/philosophy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Alakzi (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophy by field has been nominated for discussion

Category:Philosophy by field, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 03:50, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Albert Burnett concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Albert Burnett, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Empirical claim concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Empirical claim, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:County government in the United States concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:County government in the United States, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hiram Platt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hiram Platt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James T. Hogg concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James T. Hogg, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Bruce Dick concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Bruce Dick, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Cannon (American revolutionary) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Cannon (American revolutionary), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Douglas (Connecticut) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Douglas (Connecticut), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Fabrizio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Fabrizio, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Martin Law, Jr. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Martin Law, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kathy Meehan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kathy Meehan, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Purley F Tucker concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Purley F Tucker, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Richard V. Donahue, Sr. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Richard V. Donahue, Sr., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Samuel C. Comstock concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Samuel C. Comstock, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stanley S. Lichty concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Stanley S. Lichty, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Thomas Fitch, III concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Thomas Fitch, III, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Vanness. A. Pierce concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Vanness. A. Pierce, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ezekiel Merritt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ezekiel Merritt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hill Woods Mullins concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hill Woods Mullins, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:James T. Vocelle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:James T. Vocelle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Belding, Jr. concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:John Belding, Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Joseph Comstock concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Joseph Comstock, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Louis B. Vocelle concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Louis B. Vocelle, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Quinn Bass concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Quinn Bass, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:42, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Algernon Speer concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Algernon Speer, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kingsville Academy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kingsville Academy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James T. Hogg

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "James T. Hogg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:39, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Thomas Fitch, III

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Thomas Fitch".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lakun.patra (talk) 09:20, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Albert Burnett

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Albert Burnett".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Azealia911 _talk 10:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Louis G. Burger.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Louis G. Burger.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:A. Craig Fletcher.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:A. Craig Fletcher.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Bruce Dick

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Bruce Dick".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Martin Law, Jr.

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Martin Law".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ezekiel Merritt

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ezekiel Merritt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:County government in the United States

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "County government in the United States".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: County government in the United States (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 333-blue was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:County government in the United States and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

333 -blue 09:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gregbard, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 333 -blue 09:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James T. Vocelle

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "James T. Vocelle".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Purley F Tucker

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Purley F Tucker".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Richard V. Donahue, Sr.

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Richard V. Donahue".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Belding, Jr.

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Belding".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 13:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hill Woods Mullins

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hill Woods Mullins".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:23, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vanness. A. Pierce

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Vanness. A. Pierce".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hiram Platt

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hiram Platt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Fabrizio has been accepted

John Fabrizio, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kathy Meehan

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kathy Meehan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stanley S. Lichty

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Stanley S. Lichty".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Empirical claim

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Empirical claim".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Algernon Speer

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Algernon Speer".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingsville Academy

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kingsville Academy".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 04:25, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Security issues has been nominated for discussion

Category:Security issues, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:20, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jesse died

Your roommate from the fall of 2001 has left us.

http://www.kolotv.com/content/news/Man-dies-after-downtown-Truckee-assault-385583601.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKuWnEjhwPk&list=PLrLvgn6_MTiAdF3gJNqdDbQGPxsBeTahY&index=4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SomeChiconian (talk • contribs) 21:09, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/test

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:WikiProject Philosophy/test, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Critical thinking has been nominated for discussion

Category:Critical thinking, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Liability has been nominated for discussion

Category:Liability, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:38, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Modus tollens

Could you please complete the references that I have flagged with {{full}} on Modus tollens? Thank you. --bender235 (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would love too. Greg Bard (talk) 17:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burials in East Norwalk Historical Cemetery has been nominated for discussion

Category:Burials in East Norwalk Historical Cemetery, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:27, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burials in Mill Hill Burying Ground has been nominated for discussion

Category:Burials in Mill Hill Burying Ground, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:33, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burials in Saint John's Cemetery (Norwalk, Connecticut) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Burials in Saint John's Cemetery (Norwalk, Connecticut), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 20:36, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Comstock has been accepted

Joseph Comstock, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:17, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis B. Vocelle has been accepted

Louis B. Vocelle, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 19:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacob Rudolf has been accepted

Jacob Rudolf, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 20:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kingsville Academy has been accepted

Kingsville Academy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Algernon Speer has been accepted

Algernon Speer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 05:57, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:AlexNewArtBot/Connecticut. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. I know this is from 2007, but that doesn't matter, this has messed up the bot so much is the last 9 years. — JJBers|talk 16:12, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

????? I haven't made an edit in over two years. What is this about? Greg Bard (talk) 22:14, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the edits in question are from 2007. Don't know why someone's just now reacting to them.

(Sorry for stalking, your talk page is on my watchlist for reasons I can no longer recall, and this made me curious). --Pfhorrest (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scholars of Islamic jurisprudence has been nominated for discussion

Category:Scholars of Islamic jurisprudence, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sandstein 20:50, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Douglas (Connecticut) has been accepted

John Douglas (Connecticut), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SwisterTwister talk 22:20, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gregbard. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Straight face test

The article Straight face test has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTDICT and possible notability issues

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wugapodes [t^hɔk] [ˈkan.ˌʧɻɪbz] 00:01, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:State constitutional officers of Washington (state) has been nominated for discussion

Category:State constitutional officers of Washington (state), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:08, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Cannon (American revolutionary)

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Cannon".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:44, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Quinn Bass

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Quinn Bass".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:12, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Samuel C. Comstock

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Samuel C. Comstock".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 02:40, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Modalities has been nominated for discussion

Category:Modalities, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Necessity has been nominated for discussion

Category:Necessity, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 01:46, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	thanks for your most interesting work on logic/philosophy LairdUnlimited (talk) 14:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vanness. A. Pierce

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Vanness. A. Pierce".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hiram Platt

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hiram Platt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kathy Meehan

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Kathy Meehan".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 15:53, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hill Woods Mullins

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Hill Woods Mullins".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 02:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Harold Booth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Harold Booth. Thanks! Chris Troutman (talk) 18:46, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:John Cannon (born 1752)

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "John Cannon".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:09, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Matthew Marvin (Connecticut politician)

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Matthew Marvin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 17:12, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:James T. Hogg

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "James T. Hogg".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Absence paradox for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Absence paradox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absence paradox until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alsee (talk) 00:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Oligarchy

Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Oligarchy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Oligarchy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Oligarchy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Corporatism

Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Corporatism, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Corporatism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Politics/Corporatism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Hiram Platt concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hiram Platt, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hiram Platt

Hello, Gregbard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hiram Platt".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. J 947 ^{^{^{(c · m)}}} 02:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Divine command theory has been nominated for discussion

Category:Divine command theory, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:33, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thomas Robins (politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Robins (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Robins (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Proposed deletion of Adger Smith

The article Adger Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Local politician who fails WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert Lee Rowe

The article Robert Lee Rowe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPOL. Local politician.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics

Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Mathematics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Professor Proof (talk) 22:16, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Minnesota Philosophical Society

The article Minnesota Philosophical Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails NORG. Could not find significant coverage from independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 00:35, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dilemata

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dilemata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. AmericanAir88^(talk) 05:39, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Steven Kuhn

The article Steven Kuhn has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Natureium (talk) 01:10, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oligarchy task force articles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Oligarchy task force articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 19:08, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Corporatism task force articles has been nominated for discussion

Category:Corporatism task force articles, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 20:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Phil-logs

Template:Phil-logs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bertrand Russell Society

The article Bertrand Russell Society has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a non-notable club. Per its website, it appears to only have ~100 members, and I have not been able to find any WP:RS that establish the notability of the club itself. Most Google/Google Books hits appear to be either self-published, WP:ROUTINE mentions of club events that do not satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH, or trivial mentions of club affiliation in books (e.g. the author is a member of the Bertrand Russell Society, acknowledgement-page mentions of it, etc). Also, substantial portions of the current article are copyright violations of the club website.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GretLomborg (talk) 03:58, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	Props to the way you designed the Aesthetics portal. It looked and still does look superb. puggo (talk) 04:38, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Social and political philosophy

Portal:Social and political philosophy, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Social and political philosophy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Social and political philosophy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 23:57, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Ethics

Portal:Ethics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ethics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Ethics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 08:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Eternal statement

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eternal statement requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ericwg (talk) 16:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wiley F. Cox for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wiley F. Cox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiley F. Cox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 17:17, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Warren Winchester.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Warren Winchester.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. FoxyGrampa75 (talk) 19:40, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:In

Template:In has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for discussion]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 22:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Epistemology

Portal:Epistemology, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Epistemology and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Epistemology during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 18:03, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Metaphysics

Portal:Metaphysics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Metaphysics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Metaphysics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 07:39, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Logic

Portal:Logic, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Logic and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Logic during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Aesthetics

Portal:Aesthetics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Aesthetics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Aesthetics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 06:53, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of South Carolina Society for Philosophy

The article South Carolina Society for Philosophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I wasn't sure if this could fit under CSD A7, but it also fails WP:GNG. It has no citations. Also, the only article that links to it is North Carolina Philosophical Association and it is also the only article that links to North Carolina Philosophical Association, making it a WP:GARDEN.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:18, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of North Carolina Philosophical Association

The article North Carolina Philosophical Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible CSD A7, but unsure. Fails WP:GNG. It has no references. It's only incoming link is South Carolina Philosophical Association and this is that article's only incoming link as well, making it a WP:WG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bait30 ^Talk? 06:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George S. Gregory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George S. Gregory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George S. Gregory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 11:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles L. Glover for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles L. Glover is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles L. Glover until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:04, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TopicLogic

Template:TopicLogic has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:58, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:17, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kentucky Philosophical Association

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kentucky Philosophical Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SL93 (talk) 21:59, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic/Navigation, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic/Navigation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Logic/Navigation during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Izno (talk) 20:59, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francis Henry Fee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francis Henry Fee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francis Henry Fee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 20:37, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of mayors of Melbourne, Florida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mayors of Melbourne, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mayors of Melbourne, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kathy Meehan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kathy Meehan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kathy Meehan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:29, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John A. Buckley for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John A. Buckley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John A. Buckley until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph F. Mullins Jr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph F. Mullins Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph F. Mullins Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vernon L. Dicks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vernon L. Dicks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vernon L. Dicks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:36, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard A. Lawrence Sr. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard A. Lawrence Sr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard A. Lawrence Sr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lock Davidson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lock Davidson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lock Davidson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 03:48, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of I. Kimbell Hicks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I. Kimbell Hicks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/I. Kimbell Hicks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Richard W. Goode for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Richard W. Goode is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard W. Goode until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rusf10 (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Florida circuit courts

A tag has been placed on Category:Florida circuit courts indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:52, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edward P. Branch

Please see Edward P. Branch talk page.. Assambrew (talk) 06:26, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Post-Classical Chinese philosophy

A tag has been placed on Category:Post-Classical Chinese philosophy indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/announce

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/announce has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 21:55, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Philosophy image of the week

Template:Philosophy image of the week has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Index of philosophy

Template:Index of philosophy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TopicTOC-Philosophy

Template:TopicTOC-Philosophy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 20:32, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dilemata

The article Dilemata has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any indication this meets WP:NPERIODICAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:37, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of mayors of Fort Pierce, Florida for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of mayors of Fort Pierce, Florida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of mayors of Fort Pierce, Florida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

AusLondonder (talk) 14:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of mayors of Vero Beach, Florida

The article List of mayors of Vero Beach, Florida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of largely non-notable individuals which fails WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of mayors of Titusville, Florida

The article List of mayors of Titusville, Florida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

List of largely non-notable individuals which fails WP:NLIST, WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 15:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Nav/template

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Nav/template has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Task force categories

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Task force categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:01, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Popular pages/Total

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Popular pages/Total has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 15:03, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Importance

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Importance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:25, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tennessee Philosophical Association for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tennessee Philosophical Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tennessee Philosophical Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

—Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 17:38, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Robert B. Oliver

The article Robert B. Oliver has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The sourcing for this article is not substnatial enough to justify an article on a mayor

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophy and culture has been nominated for merging

Category:Philosophy and culture has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 22:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Contemporary philosophers has been nominated for merging

Category:Contemporary philosophers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 14:27, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American settlers has been nominated for renaming

Category:American settlers has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American settlers has been nominated for merging

Category:American settlers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:56, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Philosophical traditions has been nominated for merging

Category:Philosophical traditions has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 20:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Metaphysics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Metaphysics, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - car chasm (talk) 06:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Epistemology

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Wikipedia:Epistemology, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - car chasm (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Topicwpphil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Topicwpphil, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - car chasm (talk) 06:04, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Topicwpphil

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Template:Topicwpphil, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - car chasm (talk) 06:56, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Topicwpphil

Template:Topicwpphil has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. - car chasm (talk) 21:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pli

The article Pli has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:BOOK

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - car chasm (talk) 03:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tautology (rule of inference)

The article Tautology (rule of inference) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article is based on misapprehension. The Hurley reference link only appears to have a different and standard usage of "tautology" (p. 74). Also see the original version of the page, which does not make the same claims.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tautology (rule of inference)

The article Tautology (rule of inference) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article appears to be based on misapprehension, and has been devoid of merit from the beginning. The initial version of the page gives two of many simple "rules of replacement" in propositional calculus, but inexplicably refers to the (two) inference rules as "tautology", where the term tautology refers to a class of propositional calculus statements, not rules of inference. For this one could give any of several standard references in mathematical logic: Kleene, Quine, Mendelson, Schoenfield, etc.. How this page has survived so long is beyond my ken. For what it's worth, the one actual reference link ("Hurley") only appears to have a different and standard usage of "tautology" (p. 74).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crisperdue (talk) 17:11, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sports associations has been nominated for merging

Category:Sports associations has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 11:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Concepts in aesthetics has been nominated for renaming

Category:Concepts in aesthetics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 17:08, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Theories of aesthetics has been nominated for renaming

Category:Theories of aesthetics has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 17:10, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dogmatism has been nominated for deletion

Category:Dogmatism has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 18:16, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Importance categories

Template:WikiProject Philosophy/Importance categories has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:09, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PhilPapers-logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PhilPapers-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 18 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brazilian Society for Analytic Philosophy

The article Brazilian Society for Analytic Philosophy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article that appears to fail the WP:GNG and WP:NORG. Searches under both names did not turn up any significant coverage, just announcements/brochures for events they hosted. The sources available also contradict the information presented in this article, as they say the organization was founded in 2008, not 1930.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 17:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Index of aesthetics articles

Template:Index of aesthetics articles has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 19:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wisconsin Philosophical Association

The article Wisconsin Philosophical Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Relies on self published content for source. Lacks significant coverage to suggest the notability of the organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 22:47, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of British Society for Ethical Theory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article British Society for Ethical Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/British Society for Ethical Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JMWt (talk) 10:00, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dimon Fanton

The article Dimon Fanton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails notability guidelines

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rockphed (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"CAT:PHIL" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect CAT:PHIL has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 19 § CAT:PHIL until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 09:12, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Founding settlers of Norwalk, Connecticut has been nominated for renaming

Category:Founding settlers of Norwalk, Connecticut has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of International Society for Environmental Ethics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on International Society for Environmental Ethics, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Exclusive Editor _{Notify Me!} 19:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:County government agencies in Kentucky

A tag has been placed on Category:County government agencies in Kentucky indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basque philosophers has been nominated for deletion

Category:Basque philosophers has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Psychastes (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Liberalism task force articles has been nominated for deletion

Category:Liberalism task force articles has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 22:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Australasian Association for Logic for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australasian Association for Logic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australasian Association for Logic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

C F A 💬 22:48, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Post-Classical Chinese philosophers has been nominated for merging

Category:Post-Classical Chinese philosophers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 02:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of International Association for Greek Philosophy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Association for Greek Philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Association for Greek Philosophy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Traumnovelle (talk) 04:29, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fascism task force has been nominated for deletion

Category:Fascism task force has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:18, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Corporatism task force has been nominated for deletion

Category:Corporatism task force has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Oligarchy task force has been nominated for deletion

Category:Oligarchy task force has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 09:19, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:California pioneers has been nominated for merging

Category:California pioneers has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 13:06, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of C. J. F. Campbell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article C. J. F. Campbell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. J. F. Campbell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Lost in Quebec (talk) 23:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]