User talk:Allthingsgo

Notability of Felix Browder

A tag has been placed on Felix Browder, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:25, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article clearly indicates notability and will not be speedy deleted. -- JLaTondre 23:11, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Better Than Starbucks

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Better Than Starbucks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 02:37, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: Mister, I see that you sometimes translate from French literature. I am also a translator. Take a look at betterthanstarbucks.org/poetry-translations and betterthanstarbucks.org/haiku-page and others. Their publication is damn good... And If you can get in touch with one poet that didn't think highly of what they do, then delete the entry all you like. thank you ! LairdUnlimited (talk)

Hi. Inclusion on Wikipedia isn't based on "likes" but on evidence of notability as Wikipedia defines that term, which is based largely on the existence of significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. The basic idea is to show that an article's topic is already a well-worn object of attention. Largoplazo (talk) 03:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: there are plenty independent even 'surprising' commentaries that I've encountered in regards of that publication. But it takes time to organize them under wikipedia.org's particular services to the general public domain. Do allow me to write them up for a week or two. Warm Regards. LairdUnlimited (talk)

If you'd like to work on articles over time to get them right, and then have someone review them before moving them into the main article space, your best bet is to create a userspace draft. Largoplazo (talk) 12:06, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Largoplazo: there is no difference between user space or main article. All that artificiality are phantoms in other's mind. I may like the page to remain under my own space, joining other like-kind. Nice talking to you. I plan to start putting in other literature sites mentioned in BTs' links page. I might need your help taking look at them. thank you in advance! LairdUnlimited (talk)

@Largoplazo: Another 'blind-spot' in wikipedia.org. I'll leave you with the question of its notability or not. https://www.researchgate.net/post/Computer_Scientists_Do_you_remember_HARTMUT_EHRIG LairdUnlimited (talk) 14:31, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Based on the number of citations his works receive according to Google Scholar, I imagine he would be considered notable under the guidelines available to academics. Largoplazo (talk) 15:56, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as AlterNIC. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:35, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: You are most welcome. I like the final look after your 'deletion'. Thank you for policing the ground, holding your big hammer. have a nice time. Nothing is what it seems LairdUnlimited (talk)

paper-republic.org - translators

@Huangdan2060: Hello, I do appreciate wiki page you created for translator Anna Chen ... I am in the process of creating paper-republic.org website pageUser:Allthingsgo/Paper-republic.org and to add a few more translators' own wikipedia page, i.e. Bruce Humes 徐穆实, Eric Abrahamsen etc... do you mind to help me along the way? Thank you in advance! LairdUnlimited (talk)

Justnumberandletter

@Justlettersandnumbers: Are you a full time wiki editor? you created an unbelievable amount of pages. How did you do that? I'm amazed. LairdUnlimited (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Allthingsgo. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucien Stryk Asian Translation Prizes.
Message added 21:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 21:50, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Really thanks for your contributions, sorry to here that you were blocked from zh-wikipedia. I trust that you're not a trouble-maker. I communicated with some editors, but, they think you made a lot of mistakes, which might quite really trouble them. For example, your articles didn't match zh:wp:mos, zh:wp:punct, which might took time of them to correct. Then, even these translations are not bad, most could still not meet our reading habit, so some strict administers might regard them as rough translation.

As you know, articles should meet the standard once it was created, so you'd better improve them in your sandbox or draft page, rather than main page.

My suggestion is that you should learn these guidelines before editing. And translates slower, spending more time to improve them, though I have no idea to unblock you, I'm still glad to help with your translation. But it will be better in your sandbox next time.

Some more guidelines:

Cheers. --“ CAPITAL PATROLLER ”^{☎ 911} 06:44, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(P.S. There might be some mistakes with my grammars for English is not my native language, please do not mind them.)

@NickNYCN

with IP + ID ban, any link to zh domain 'disables' javascript executing too? So, unless I can to my AWS and launch terminal browser, I can't write to anybody from my existing endpoint... such inconvenience! btw, what are those guidelines for? stupid grammar checks and punc marks etc, are we enrolling back in high school English/Chinese lessons now or what?

I'll have to retreat back to my other notepad for translating. check out our output here [ http://patreon.com/allthingsgo ]

Thanks for your sympathetic view. This 'ban' also prevented me from applying to the arbitration committee as a standing candidate but good things take time. I have patience. Always look on the bright side, right?

LairdUnlimited 06:56, 9 September 2018 (UTC)

Your signature and categories

Hi Allthingsgo. There appears to be a problem with the way you're signing your talk page posts. All signatures are required to have at least one link per WP:SIGLINK to your user page, user talk page, etc., but your signature doesn't have any links at all. Are you signing your posts using WP:TILDE? If you are, then perhaps you mistakenly checked " Treat the above as wiki markup." in the "Signature" section of your user preferences.

Also, categories reserved for articles are supposed to be added only to articles; they are not supposed to be added to user pages or drafts, etc. per WP:USERNOCAT and WP:DRAFTNOCAT. So, if you're working on a draft or usersapce draft for a future article, you can simply disable the categories per WP:COLON or use a template like {{draft categories}}. You can simply re-enable the categories after the draft has been moved to the article namespace. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:53, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but sometime, i came in from the 'cold', terminal browser. I'm old school as such no 'JavaScript' at my disposal. don't use it and don't need. thanks for your concern. LairdUnlimited 22:52, 9 September 2018 (UTC)Allthingsgo

Old school or not, you need to have a link in your signature per WP:SIGLINK. Maybe you can added manually after the fact. Some of your previously signed posts like #paper-republic.org - translators have links; so, if you're having browser issues, then maybe someone at WP:VPT can help. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:33, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

looks like my own .sig image was closed by wikipedia admin. Public officials are hard to please, so it seems on WWW... [ https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T8379]... i usually refuse to provide any _hard_ evidence without face to face meeting...Every sign is but a sign to a situational decision tree... LairdUnlimited 08:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Allthingsgo

The inclusion of a link to your userpage/talkpage in your signature is not optional. This holds especially true if your signature does not match your actual username. You can include the link by doing the following:

Go to Special:Preferences
Copy the following the following into the Signature field:

[[User:Allthingsgo|LairdUnlimited]]

Tick the box labelled Treat the above as wiki markup
Scroll to the bottom of the page and click the Save button.

If you continue to use an unlinked signature, you are liable to be blocked from en-wiki. Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:02, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hangon, I'm still trying to figure IT out myself. I only wish to know if I'd be in a no-'click' computing environment, how would I do all things as 'usual'. --LairdUnlimited 11:37, 10 September 2018 (UTC)Allthingsgo

So that's two more times today that you've used your unlinked signature - given that I have provided step-by-step instructions above, including the markup you need to use, I can only assume that you are deliberately refusing to change your signature to comply with Wikipedia's requirements. As such, consider this your final warning: if you sign a comment without linked signature again, you will be blocked from editing. Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:27, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for refusal to abide by community norms, which is considered disruptive. This edit makes it clear that you intend to deliberately ignore Wikipedia's policies in favour of your own personal preference, which is not acceptable here.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note to reviewing admin I am perfectly happy for anyone to unblock this user once they agree to make the required changes to their signature; you don't need to check in with me first. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:53, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How do U translate blockdata? thanks for your five fingers. I shall get more traveling done in the mean time. ciao [ https://zh-classical.wikipedia.org/User:Allthingsgo ] --LairdUnlimited 12:22, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Allthingsgo

Whether due to the fact that English is not your first language or simply general incoherence on your part, I have literally no idea what you are trying to convey in your emails. I will not be responding to you by email; if you wish to communicate with me you may do so here. Yunshui ^雲 _水 07:22, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Allthingsgo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Not autoblocked; you are blocked directly. Yamla (talk) 23:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Allthingsgo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #22753 was submitted on Sep 23, 2018 16:04:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Allthingsgo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23050 was submitted on Oct 26, 2018 15:13:43. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:13, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Allthingsgo, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

MCC 214 #aut viam inveniam aut faciam 07:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]