User talk:Gowthamaprabu

Welcome!

Hello, Gowthamaprabu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sun Pictures did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Ravensfire (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Please see WP:MINOR for when to tag your edits as minor. Cheers! Jeraxmoira (talk) 20:24, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at List of Tamil films of 2023 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Jeraxmoira (talk) 07:52, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreliable source

Sacnilk.com is considered an unreliable source, per WP:ICTFSOURCES. So other sources using Sacnilk box office are also unreliable, as per WP:FRUIT. Thanks. NaanReady (talk) 03:19, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

S. U. Arun Kumar

Hi Gowthamaprabu, per WP:FILMOGRAPHY: Do not add future projects until filming has begun as verified by a reliable source. Jeraxmoira (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Indian films of 2023

Please kindly refrain from disruptive editing by reverting edits with consistent BO figures from reliable sources. Thanks Audit Guy (talk) 06:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello, I'm Archer1234. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, George Maryan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Archer (t·c) 07:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Thavamai Thavamirundhu that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Archer (t·c) 07:31, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Joe (2023 film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 08:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Joe (2023 film), you may be blocked from editing. This addition after you were already reverted is puzzling. Where did you get the information for Think Music or the track lengths when it only mentions the name of the five songs? CNMall41 (talk) 20:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Shamna Kasim. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:24, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singapore Saloon (January 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Singapore Saloon instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately, another editor has written a version which stands better with respect to notability of future films.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Singapore Saloon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gowthamaprabu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 00:17, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naam Iruvar Namakku Iruvar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cook. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Good work in adding cast information. DareshMohan (talk) 23:20, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on List of Tamil films of 2024

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of Tamil films of 2024, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:32, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hi Gowthamaprabu! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Sathish that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Sathish. — Archer1234 (t·c) 18:14, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Ghilli, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please see WP:NOINDICSCRIPT. CodeTalker (talk) 04:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (April 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

Submission feels like a Work-in-Progress. Please resubmit when complete.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Tamil films of 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 13:37, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lesa Lesa

When is the name Colonel Rajasekhar mentioned? I had seen the film so I was just curious. DareshMohan (talk) 18:24, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just before the intermission, where Radharavi leaves the hospital after visiting Shaam, a person begins a conversation with Radharavi were he himself introduces as Colonel Rajasekar. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

The list is empty. It is not suitable for mainspace at the moment and should incubate as a draft until entires can be added.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Tamil films of 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 00:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hats off!

Just saw your recent plot and cast edits to Thangalaan, Mazhai Pidikkatha Manithan and Demonte Colony 2. They speak of quality. It must be hard to remember an entire movie's plot -- not sure how you do it but great work. DareshMohan (talk) 07:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words and appreciation. I'd like to know, is it that too early to add the plotline within a couple of days of release? Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:02, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a kind request to look into Pechi, Jama, Boat pages as well, as i felt difficulty to trim them to the specified limit. I snap the important scenes to remember the continuity and some crucial details. Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:13, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

never too early to add plot upon release. I am trying to take Wikipedia:Wikibreak to be more productive 🤣. Technically my edits too are original research (against Wiki policy) such as adding unsourced character names. I would also like to take photos of end credits, etc. but that is just odd to do and is also original research. I wish I could edit like Kailash and do sourced edits only. DareshMohan (talk) 21:57, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

wish you success in all your future endeavours 😝. as you mentioned, everyone know its obvious and a fact but proofs and references are 🥵 Gowthamaprabu (talk) 17:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj

Curious why you created this page under that title when there was previously one under Sharanya Turadi. CNMall41 (talk) 01:47, 20 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

created a new page Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj with an entirely different content from the that of Sharanya Turadi which has been deleted and hence didnt contact the user who deleted Sharanya Turadi, furthur it directly translated from Sharanya Turadi Sundarraj which has been updated to relevance. Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Tamil films of 2025 (August 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

Please submit this in December 2024/January 2025, currently this whole list is WP:CRYSTALBALL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Tamil films of 2025 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 02:58, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of reputable sources

Gowthamaprabu, do not delete reputable references from the article. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to delete content and indulge in edit warring as you did at Thangalaan, you may be blocked from editing. Tamilcontent1 (talk) 12:05, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I must clarify that the citations I removed from the Thangalaan article, such as MSN and Zoomtv, did not meet Wikipedia:Reliable sources criteria. My intention was to update the worldwide gross box office value to ₹100 crores, as officially announced by the film producer Studio Green on X, rather than the inaccurate range of ₹70-100 crores cited by User:Tamilcontent1 with an outdated source (Dated: 28.08.2024) from Pinkvilla. I expect your edits to have accuracy and adherence to Wikipedia's standards in future edits. Thank you. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:33, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kozhipannai Chelladurai (September 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wait until its release.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kozhipannai Chelladurai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay..:) Gowthamaprabu (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhonima has been accepted

Dhonima, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for acceptance and creation. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 17:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lubber Pandhu has been accepted

Lubber Pandhu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 12:30, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:35, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kozhipannai Chelladurai has been accepted

Kozhipannai Chelladurai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Monhiroe (talk) 06:16, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou Gowthamaprabu (talk) 06:23, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good work brother. Happy editing. Monhiroe (talk) 06:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the appreciation and acceptance brother Gowthamaprabu (talk) 06:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bun Butter Jam moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Bun Butter Jam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and We can wait until Release date Announce. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 20:48, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thanks for draftifying. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:00, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chennai City Gangsters has been accepted

Chennai City Gangsters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Monhiroe (talk) 09:18, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Really excited and happy about that. Must look into Category:B-Class articles for undertanding how it works. Thanks again Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:01, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

appreciated

Your work laam Supperb . Keeip moving . If you intrested : add receptions for latest tamil films Dhonima,Kozhipannai Chelladurai,Nandhan,Thozhar CheGuevara and Kadaisi Ulaga Por Monhiroe (talk) 09:20, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the appreciation brother. Sure kandippa I'll do. So far, antha section add pannathilla! I only used to see how you do them. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:57, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sattam En Kaiyil (2024 film) (September 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wait until its release per WP:NFF.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sattam En Kaiyil (2024 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 13:25, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Shall wait Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:29, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thandakaaranyam moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Thandakaaranyam. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and can wait until release date. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 08:38, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi bro. I appricate your good work. but film not makes notable after 2 reviews only it i will be notable. I would recommend u to create page after released Date announce. Because they are many film. Wikipedia will become Database then.. Good Job Keep moving Monhiroe (talk) 08:41, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok bro. I hope its incubated as a draft and shall bring it to mainspace after release Gowthamaprabu (talk) 08:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

yes bro.You can keep draft in draft. Monhiroe (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, that you've nominated your page Thandakaaranyam for deletion! Gowthamaprabu (talk) 08:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Manikandan's Next moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Manikandan's Next. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because wait until release date announce. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 08:42, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Gowthamaprabu (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yogi Babu years

Are you sure that he needs year dividers? You can merge the 2000s and 2010s sections together since 2009 only has 2 films. DareshMohan (talk) 06:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. will do it. 2020's list was quite huge and expanding, so divided it for editing convenience. I'll merge 2000's and 2010's now Gowthamaprabu (talk) 06:22, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohan Rajan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vishal Mishra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rectified Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:43, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aghathiyaa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Aghathiyaa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because can wait until release date. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 17:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Gowthamaprabu (talk) 03:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Once More (upcoming Tamil film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Once More (upcoming Tamil film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and can wait until release date . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 17:56, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Gowthamaprabu (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kombuseevi (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kombuseevi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 09:09, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Diplomacy
	Hi Gowtham, I see your good work in keeping the trurth in Wikipedia SenPeter (talk) 01:47, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your appreciation. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 02:07, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Retta Thala has been accepted

Retta Thala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Monhiroe (talk) 16:44, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Supperb Work bro.Keep it up moving. Also support smal movies. Monhiroe (talk) 17:02, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot brother for the recognition and support. I'd like to thank you for time and appreciations. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 17:05, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss You (film) (October 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Royiswariii was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP: NOT YET (films), please wait to release that.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss You (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Royiswariii (talk) 06:50, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sorgavaasal has been accepted

Sorgavaasal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 09:19, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Gowthamaprabu (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thiru. Manickam has been accepted

Thiru. Manickam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Tavantius (talk) 15:47, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Gowthamaprabu (talk) 12:01, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Aditi Shankar. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Will not do that in future Gowthamaprabu (talk) 07:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Adhirshtasaali (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Monhiroe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

will wait until relese date comes bro. or fully all complete

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adhirshtasaali and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Monhiroe (talk) 07:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Shall wait Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Phoenix (2024 film) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Phoenix (2024 film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because After 2 reviews come .Move the page bro. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Monhiroe (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay bro. Done.... Gowthamaprabu (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miss You (film) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Miss You (film) instead.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

1. Planned films that have not begun production (principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film draft must, at this time, be evaluated based on general notability of production.

The best practice with regard to unreleased films is usually to wait until the film is released, and then update the draft to include review information, and resubmit when the film is released and reviewed.

There is also an article, although this unreleased film does not satisfy film notability. The article will be checked for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miss You (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:51, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]