Jump to content

User talk:GorillaWarfare/Archive 22

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please block Lavito principa

Hi, please block Lavito principa as a sock of Lazy-restless.[1] Also if possible delete Draft:Paradoxical Sajid, Pak-Bangla language, Khandaker Abdullah Jahangir under WP:G5. What happend is Lazy-restless creates account, creates draft from IP, waits for some days and then login and edits to became WP:AUTOCONFIRM, and then move article to main namespace. In this way the user gets around G5. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Quick message to say thanks for your Web3 is Going Just Great website. I read it as religiously as I do my wordles. You are awesome. All the best! Sara — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.189.166.2 (talk) 21:26, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for saying so, and I'm glad you like it! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:47, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:34, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the deletion of Do Kwon tweets

Hi GorillaWarfare!

First off, thank you very much for the adjustments you made on the content that I added. I also realized that you deleted some portion on the Do Kwon page regarding his inflammatory tweets. I do understand your logic behind the deletion: that the page should not amount to becoming a gossip page. However, my only concern is that Kwon’s highly inflammatory tweets need to be documented at some level on the page to fully comprehend the crisis that took place.

My logic behind it is that his twitter account was utilized as one of the main outlets for interaction with his investors, therefore what he said on it needs to be considered on a more official ground rather than mere gossip. In fact, his inflammatory remarks were his “official” responses to valid concerns and questions from experts and investors. Hence, I personally think that they should be recorded accordingly. Secondly, my background in public/private financial regulation tells me that The so called “CEO Risk” is an important factor for investors and governance institutions alike. Meaning, the attitude, ethical characteristics, and likability of the CEO or public official of a certain company/institution is one of the most important factors when analyzing a firm/institution or a crisis in general. In other words, my point is that the “CEO Risk” is very much a real thing in the field and Kwon’s tweets are very indicative of it.

Hence, to sum up, I think it is necessary to document his tweets. I am not sayings “all” of his tweets need to be documented, but at least those that related directly to expert and investor concerns and questions. And of course, ones that have been commented and documented on news articles. I just think some justice needs to be done to those who raised valid concerns to Do Kwon and Terraform Labs via their main interactive platform/outlet, and were subsequently abashed to being “poor” and “cockroaches”.

I do not own or have owned any cryptocurrency to be personally engaged in “gossiping” on Kwon. I simply am concerned that important dimensions such as the “CEO Risk” need to be documented to raise valid awareness for everyday investors that do not have much knowledge on financial regulation. Furthermore, I think that the fact that these everyday investors are not only from South Korea, where the firm mainly began its operations, but resulted to a worldwide crisis only further reflects my point that such dimensions of financial risk need to be pertinently documented to mitigate any more crisis of the kind in the future.

I do not have much experience on Wikipedia, as you can see on my account. I do apologize for any customary shortcomings on interacting with you or other users on Wikipedia. I hope to learn and be guided by more experienced people as I venture about here. Thank you very much for reading this and hope to hear your take on this matter soon.

Genuinely, Babyjust Babyjust (talk) 05:11, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Babyjust: While I understand your argument, Wikipedia articles need to reflect what is described in independent, reliable sources (in proportion to the weight it's given in those sources). That means that we as editors should not be making the decision that Kwon's tweets are noteworthy enough to include based on logic like you present above (such as that they illustrate CEO risk), but rather based on whether other reliable sources have chosen to report about it. I suspect that you could find quality sources that do give weight to those tweets, in which case the inclusion could be justified—but "econovill.com" and Business Insider did not seem sufficient to justify their inclusion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:39, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I understand what you mean. Thanks a lot for the heads up, really. I will try to look for more reliable and independent sources in the future. Thanks again! Babyjust (talk) 03:07, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare: Hi, just wanted to confirm something about the newly split page of Terra.

I found that the source below was left out on the new page and was wondering whether it was because it was considered an unreliable source?:

[1]

I did rewrite the source in the new format (using the original Korean title) that you laid out. The following is the rewritten source:

[2]

While I do understand that my translations are not the most pitch-perfect ones, I think they still very close to the original meaning. Hence, I just wanted to get confirmation whether the reason of its deletion is its source? Thanks! Babyjust (talk) 02:15, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, the year written needs to be “2022”, not “2021” on the second version of the source. Sorry. Babyjust (talk) 02:17, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Babyjust: Was it previously included? I don't recall removing it, but if you link me to a revision that contained it I might be able give more context. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:52, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Son, Suk-woo (16 May 2022). "Analysis of the (Korean) K-Coins Luna and Terra Crisis and Its Impact on Cryptocurrency". SBS. Archived from the original on 16 May 2022. Retrieved 16 May 2022.
  2. ^ Son, Seok-woo (16 May 2021). "[이슈분석] 'K-코인' 루나·테라 사태에 가상자산 '쇼크'…영향은?" [[Issue Analysis] Aftermaths of the ‘K-Coin’, Luna and Terra Crisis and the Cryptocurrency’Shock’]. Seoul Broadcasting System (in Korean). Archived from the original on 18 May 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.

@GorillaWarfare:: I think it’s this revision where the reference was lost (I’m not sure if this is the customary way of linking old revisions):

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terra_(blockchain)&oldid=1088403237 Babyjust (talk) 02:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Babyjust: Oh, I see what happened. There was an issue with the ref name, which was <ref name=""SBSbizart220516""> (note the double quotation marks). When I edited the page with the visual editor it looks like it didn't know how to handle the broken wikitext. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:06, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GorillaWarfare: I see. I think it’s because of the quotation marks I inserted, not knowing that Wikipedia automatically inserts quotation marks for titles. Will refrain from doing so in future (by the way, I had not the slightest idea you were such an expert guru on Web3 and cryptocurrency. Read about your work yesterday on HBR, truly appreciate the work you’re doing). Babyjust (talk) 03:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:19, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your blog

Hello Molly,

I read about you in the Washington Post, and then I read your blog. Excellent work! Cullen328 (talk) 18:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:00, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Huh, didn't know you were behind web3isgoinggreat, I think my CS prof last semester mentioned the website (while ranting about crypto and how scams are so common that he won't get out of bed for less than a 10 million dollar loss) :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 22:38, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Were you lucky enough to have Prof Weaver? GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:27, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed! I took a great computer security class with him. Galobtter (pingó mió) 23:34, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I bet it was! He's great. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June events from Women in Red

Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Oh my God

You're famous! Congratulations on meeting WP:GNG. Scorpions13256 (talk) 16:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • Administrators using the mobile web interface can now access Special:Block directly from user pages. (T307341)
  • The IP Info feature has been deployed to all wikis as a Beta Feature. Any autoconfirmed user may enable the feature using the "IP info" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. Autoconfirmed users will be able to access basic information about an IP address that includes the country and connection method. Those with advanced privileges (admin, bureaucrat, checkuser) will have access to extra information that includes the Internet Service Provider and more specific location.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As per the article about you in The Washington Post from this past month, let me know if you need or want help with any articles related to cryptocurrencies. I also tend to be skeptical about their introduction into the financial system. I recently expanded the section of the Gary Gensler article to include summaries of news items about changes to cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, and I added some news items about to the Cryptocurrency bubble article a few years ago. I'm not a computer scientist, but I did complete an introductory computer programming course in college, as well as the calculus sequence, an introductory macroeconomics course, and an intermediate microeconomics course. If nothing else, I can at least help you keep track of things reported in the news and can try to help read and summarize other information (e.g. books, academic articles) you come across to save you time. I also live in Massachusetts. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 21:45, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that! I haven't had as much time as I might like for them, unfortunately, but they need all the help they can get. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:55, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, again! Not sure if you heard about this, but I've now updated the Gary Gensler article with a summary about it. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 18:30, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: I've now separated the content about cryptocurrencies on the Gary Gensler article into a separate subsection and copied much of the content into the Cryptocurrency section of the Economic policy of the Joe Biden administration article. -- CommonKnowledgeCreator (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Attorney General of New York Warns Crypto Investors

https://ag.ny.gov/press-release/2022/investor-alert-attorney-general-james-warns-new-yorkers-about-cryptocurrency

You're probably on top of this, but just in case. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 17:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was very glad to see it! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:19, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats on the new bio. You're awesome. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 19:34, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NY Mayor appears suddenly silent on his Crypto capital of the world thing. SPECIFICO talk 20:33, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protect Our Future PAC

Hi there, I recently created a draft for Protect Our Future, a super PAC funded by Sam Bankman-Fried that has been quite active this primary season and will likely be even more active this fall and during the 2024 election. Any help would be really wonderful! Best, Thriley (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ashley Gjøvik for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ashley Gjøvik is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ashley Gjøvik until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sebastien1118 (talk) 09:41, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just on the odd chance you haven't seen these already, you may unfortunately be interested in Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ban_evasion, and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SquareInARoundHole. Just when I had the Square pegged (so to speak) as a well meaning technology firm labor activist... even contributed a bit to the cause... --GRuban (talk) 19:27, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is surprising. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:17, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, GorillaWarfare. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Doug Weller talk 15:08, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Protection conflict

Hi GW, it looks like we edit conflicted on Tom Cotton. I reinstated your protection, sorry about that. -- LuK3 (Talk) 00:14, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, feel free to restore the longer protection if you think it's needed. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:16, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cimbrian War

What do you think is "unconstructive" in my edit?. A year ago I made a stable version of this article, I return it after some OR nationalist's POV edits. 109.254.254.152 (talk) 00:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of a citation for [3], complete change of meaning with the "or" and "vs" changes, and grammar errors with the "might" change in [4]. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:23, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with the grammatical error. But the quote could remain in place until the sources were inserted there (still need to look for a translation). Also wording "vs" is more suitable in my opinion. Mediafile is also non-neutral and was posted by without consensus. ---109.254.254.152 (talk) 00:32, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please include sources alongside new claims, rather than waiting to add them later on. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:55, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in July 2022

Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:47, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Edit Request Tool changes

Hello, I just made some significant changes to User:Terasail/Edit Request Tool. Since you have the tool active, I am informing you of this since it may affect you. To open the tool you will now have to click the "respond" button. The tool will load a similar interface as before. There is now a live preview of the response. These changes might have introduced some bugs so if you have any concerns / suggestions or run into problems please leave a note at User talk:Terasail/Edit Request Tool Thanks, Terasail[✉️] 15:29, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request for a second set of eyes

Do you think you'd be able to quickly glance over what's present in User:ProfGray's sandbox? It's an article-in-progress on trans genocide, which seems like it may be something in your wheelhouse. I've got some of my own prose I'm working on separately since it seems like Gray is planning on pushing this to the article space fairly soon, but any thoughts you have on notability here would be super helpful - I don't have a fantastic track record at discerning that. If not, no worries! ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 18:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I think notability is pretty clear from specific use of the term in published law journal articles, other scholarly works, two tertiary works (encyclopedias), and various news sources, as cited. ProfGray (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
to clarify or correct myself -- the reliable sources above either mention the term in a meaningful way or treat it as a subject matter, which enable it to satisfy notability criteria ProfGray (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jim Chanos on crypto

Excellent work you have been doing on your Web3 site regarding cryptos. Have you ever followed Jim Chanos (one of America's most famous short sellers and exposer of many famous Wall St ponzi schemes, including Enron)? He tweets under the name "Diogenes @WallStCynic" [5], and often covers the crypto space. 78.18.245.153 (talk) 10:27, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have and I do! I also liked his episode on Crypto Critics' Corner ("Crypto, Coinbase, and Contagion"). GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On Point

I heard your interview today on On Point. Congrats, and I appreciate your criticism of crypto. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:21, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 18:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2022).

Technical news

  • user_global_editcount is a new variable that can be used in abuse filters to avoid affecting globally active users. (T130439)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The New Pages Patrol queue has around 10,000 articles to be reviewed. As all administrators have the patrol right, please consider helping out. The queue is here. For further information on the state of the project, see the latest NPP newsletter.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something to entertain you

Knowing your interests, I thought you might like to see this. Some of the sources are, shall we say interesting? Nick Moyes (talk) 16:30, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations

Congratulations on being promoted to a good article status. —⁠andrybak (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fifteenth anniversary on Wikipedia!


Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear GorillaWarfare/Archive 22,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 13:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day!

Hey, GorillaWarfare. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Wiki-Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop and My Little Pony Fan) 19:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red August 2022

Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Real Life Barnstar
Congratulations on your notability in reliable sources and your great work on Wikipedia. Andrevan@ 23:16, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Real Life Barnstar
Congrats on becoming a GA! CLYDEFRANKLIN 21:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2022).

Administrator changes

readded Valereee
removed Anthony Appleyard (deceased) • Capitalistroadster • Samsara

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has been closed with consensus to add javascript that will show edit notices for editors editing via a mobile device. This only works for users using a mobile browser, so iOS app editors will still not be able to see edit notices.
  • An RfC has been closed with the consensus that train stations are not inherently notable.

Technical news

  • The Wikimania 2022 Hackathon will take place virtually from 11 August to 14 August.
  • Administrators will now see links on user pages for "Change block" and "Unblock user" instead of just "Block user" if the user is already blocked. (T308570)

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case request Geschichte has been automatically closed after a 3 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • You can vote for candidates in the 2022 Board of Trustees elections from 16 August to 30 August. Two community elected seats are up for election.
  • Wikimania 2022 is taking place virtually from 11 August to 14 August. The schedule for wikimania is listed here. There are also a number of in-person events associated with Wikimania around the world.
  • Tech tip: When revision-deleting on desktop, hold ⇧ Shift between clicking two checkboxes to select every box in that range.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship anniversary

{{u|Sdkb}} talk 03:46, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Deletion review for Lovejoy (band)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Lovejoy (band). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Strugglehouse (talk) 12:13, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in September 2022

Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241


Online events:


Request for help:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Coordinated abuse of WP:NOTE process

Talk:Liz_Fong-Jones -- having moved on from vandalising the page about me, there's now what appears to be a campaign by anon & infrequent contributors to out of the blue propose deletion under WP:NOTE. Raising for your awareness as I know you work on extremism topics and care about the issue, and I'm obviously conflict of interested. Lizthegrey (talk) 00:18, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ugh. Thanks for the heads up, I've watchlisted it. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I've also watchlisted, and will keep an eye out for any of these sorts of issues :) Sideswipe9th (talk) 00:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Helen and Mike Webberley

Not sure of the proper tags to add (notability? npov?) but this article looks problematic to me. Funcrunch (talk) 05:49, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've just nominated it for deletion (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helen and Mike Webberley) given the BLP concerns. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 14:18, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit on Stephen Bonnell

There is a debated allegation about a living person (Stephen Bonnell) that was added and subsequently removed. Instead of bringing this allegation to the talk page or undoing its deletion with a response, you added the allegation in as a new edit and claimed it was made to "Avoid passive voice". I really hope this was some weird bug where you started to edit the section of text, and then maybe it was deleted and by the time you submitted the edit, it was saved in a weird way... I don't know, but as it looks, it appears malicious, so please consider this a warning that doing this again would lead me to report to administrators for vandalism. Grenvilledodge (talk) 15:50, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss the content concerns at Talk:Destiny (streamer)#Keffals edit war. I'm glad you at least recognize what happened with the edit conflict due to rapid edits to the page—I clicked save after resolving the conflict without fixing the summary, which can't be edited after the fact. You might check out WP:AGF rather than leaping to "maliciously, purposefully misleading" and threats to report vandalism—it's a pretty common issue with MediaWiki software. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:55, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Grenvilledodge: Perhaps you don't realize this, but GorillaWarfare is an admin herself and has been a Wikipedia editor for over 15 years. That doesn't mean she's infallible, of course, but do assume good faith, as she advises. Funcrunch (talk) 20:00, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Eckersley (computer scientist)

I'm not proficient in Wikipedia markup, so forgive me for bad formatting.

In https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Peter_Eckersley_(computer_scientist)&diff=next&oldid=1108515044 you removed the cause of death.

The cause of death is clear from this tweet: https://twitter.com/bcrypt/status/1565930964252905473

I know that in general Wikipedia dislikes tweets as information sources, but another information source in the article (https://community.letsencrypt.org/t/peter-eckersley-may-his-memory-be-a-blessing/183854) specifically referred https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yan_Zhu (who is https://twitter.com/bcrypt) as information source as they are close to Peter Eckersley.

What would be a good way to still get the cause of death included?

(Note I'm almost through my energy budget for today, see https://twitter.com/jpluimers, so I might not respond quickly). Jpluimers (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given that he passed so recently I am hoping that a proper obituary will be published soon that includes that detail. While I personally agree that Yan is a trustworthy source on this, a tweet can't really be used as a proper source (and the forum post is pushing it also, even though Schoen is also pretty clearly trustworthy on this subject). See WP:SPS. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 13:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks!
Are you going to try to keep an eye on an obituary? Jpluimers (talk) 14:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I set up a Google alert for it so I don't forget. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:23, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! Jpluimers (talk) 09:23, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote in the 2022 Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election

Hello hello. I hope this message finds you well.

The Wikimedia Foundation Inc. Board of Trustees election ends soon, please vote. At least one of the candidates is worthy of support. --MZMcBride (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiwi Farms

Would it not make more sense to try and get their URL globally banned instead of just English Wikipedia? Trade (talk) 15:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You could suggest it at meta:Talk:Spam blacklist#Proposed additions, but my guess is it'll end up being a wiki-by-wiki decision. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Does linking to Kiwi Farm violate global policy or does it not? People can't seem to decide --Trade (talk) 23:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think it does; others apparently do not. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 23:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Peter Eckersley (computer scientist)

On 6 September 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Peter Eckersley (computer scientist), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:22, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice day/night

Just felt like wishing you a good day/night! Also that Dr. Strangelove meme is hilarious Stephanie921 (talk) 22:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yw :) Stephanie921 (talk) 01:01, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question about policy

Hello,

If a user is topic-banned but I see them still editing in the area they're banned from, pls can u tell me where I can report this vio? I tried looking it up but couldn't find anything Stephanie921 (talk) 18:10, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Stephanie921: If the topic ban was imposed via an Arbitration Committee decision or by an administrator as a part of the discretionary sanctions regime, violations can be reported at WP:AE. Otherwise it should probably go to WP:AN. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 19:17, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, ty! Stephanie921 (talk) 19:31, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kiwi Farms and that artist

Hey. There's a couple of editors that in the current flurry of activities at Talk:Kiwi Farms have necroed a discussion from May 2022 to try and mention a certain artist in the article. I've tried to remove a pseudo RfC that seems to have been opened because one of the editors felt as though The discussion didn't seem to be going anywhere, despite it deferring to the longstanding consensus to exclude that person's name, however that has been reverted. Given your familiarity with the topic, and the many past discussions, is there any chance you could look at the discussion and the pseudo RfC if you have a moment please? Sideswipe9th (talk) 04:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sideswipe9th: Looks like it's already been handled by a different editor. I'm probably not the best person to handle more administrative things to do with that page, like whether RfCs are legitimate or need to be removed, since I'm also involved with editing the content. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I realise now I wasn't clear on this, I really need to stop commenting at 5am, I wasn't actually asking for you to intervene with your admin hat on. I was hoping that with your familiarity with the past discussions on this topic, you'd be able to direct others to the relevant ones, similar to your reply in this discussion. Unfortunately two of the links in your August 2021 comment are broken, I've found one of the threads at AN, but I couldn't find the "Recent Events" discussion in the KF talk archive and unfortunately it seems to have a relative link to that archive. Sideswipe9th (talk) 19:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just updated those links so they can be referred to more reliably. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wording change?

Hi! I saw you changed the wording of my edit "harassment internet forum" to "harassment forum". I just want to know why, is there some policy on this that I missed? Your edit summary "sp" didn't give me anything useful, WP:SP doesn't seem to be what you're referring to. Thanks in advance! Holzklöppel (talk) 15:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Holzklöppel: Sorry for the confusing summary, that's short for "spelling" and was in reference to me fixing the spelling of "harassment". I mostly just removed "internet" because it's pretty clear from the context of the sentence that we're talking about internet forums, so it's not really necessary. I don't feel that strongly about it, though. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:33, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks! Holzklöppel (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Change to the CheckUser team

At her request by email to the committee, the CheckUser permissions of GorillaWarfare are removed. The Arbitration Committee sincerely thanks GorillaWarfare for her long service as a CheckUser, and her continuing service as an Oversighter. For the Arbitration Committee, Wugapodes (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Change to the CheckUser team

Just saying hi

I've kinda randomly got here through someone called Sergecross's talk page after seeing that he was involved in editing List of music considered the worst. Someone on his talkpage mentioned in an argument someone was having that you were one of the editors they admired, so I clicked through - and then I liked your face! Decided I liked you even more when I saw the pic from Strangelove. And then it took me a while to see the "queer" tag in the box after seeing your reference to outing in your brief bio. Ugh. Articles on incels and all that stuff - rather you than me! I prefer to keep away from all that toxic masculinity bs - but I guess someone has to fight back against that bullshit. --PaulHammond (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

is this a parody or copypasta? RRorg (talk) 21:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@PaulHammond: "Articles on incels and all that stuff - rather you than me! I prefer to keep away from all that toxic masculinity bs - but I guess someone has to fight back against that bullshit" bro are you being serious? 💀 — Python Drink (talk) 18:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The Gorilla is a lot friendlier than some of the people stalking her talk page. --GRuban (talk) 00:49, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@GRuban: what did you mean? — Python Drink (talk) 23:38, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Cyber Anakin § A mountain out of molehill?. 45.136.197.235 (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primefac has recently deleted about 23 of my blockquotes on the grounds of copyright violation. See for example the "View History" sections of Wanderlust: The Amazing Ida Pfeiffer, the First Female Tourist. In view of Wikiquote, how can Primefac's deletions be justified in terms of copyright violation? Furthermore, I think that instead of the blockquote being deleted, the entire article should have been moved to draftspace. Suslindisambiguator (talk)

Help With Accountability Software Page

Hi @GorillaWarfare! A year ago we had robust discussions on The Babylon Bee page and I thought you were very fair to both sides. I was wondering if you could help regarding the Wikipedia page on Accountability Software. It was completely rewritten a few days ago in an alarming way. I've been trying to have a reasonable discussion with two editors but they routinely ignore valid points of discussion and revert every change I make.

They've fundamentally redefined what the software does in an inaccurate way, based on a new article that describes abuse of the software. For example, the equivalent on Babylon Bee would be to start with "The Babylon Bee is a misinformation site masquerading as a satire site", as opposed to defining it accurately and then including discussion around the misinformation questions. Do you have any bandwidth to assist? Keithgreenfan (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One follow up in case you see this. We now have a mediator on a dispute page so hopefully that will help. Would still love your take (if that works in this process) as I think you’d be fair to them and us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keithgreenfan (talk • contribs) 14:41, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red October 2022

Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some falafel for you!

Your [timeline] is awesome

It filled in a lot of gaps in my understanding (I am trying to understand the current board fundraising and Wikienterprize deafness through historical issues) Have some virtual falafel from Melbourne Australia (Double Chilli) :-) 

Wakelamp d[@-@]b (talk) 11:45, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incel Talk Edits

Proposed a method of making the page easier to find for people who don't know the term "incel". Proposed a picture of known Incel Elliott Roger with the bowlcut hairstyle he was last seen with after he shot a church full of people. Proposed that the page remain balanced with a variety of opinions, instead of the article remaining overly sympathetic of the far-right terrorist cis heteronormative white males described by the article.

In what way were these disruptive? 88.106.227.59 (talk) 14:14, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

White Nationalist/Nationalism categories

Hello, Molly,

You seem to work with controversial content and I hope that you, or a talk page stalker, can help out here. The immediate issue is that we have a bunch of country-specific White Nationalist/Nationalism categories that have been emptied and are sitting in Category:Empty categories awaiting deletion. Often when I see a fairly new editor do this, I revert some of their edits but I'm finding that the borderlines between Nationalist, White Nationalist, White Supremacist and Neo-Nazi can be a bit blurry (Neo-Nazi is the most clearly defined). I think some individuals that got put in "White Nationalist" categories are white and nationalist and have regressive views on race but maybe do not identify themselves as a White Nationalist and so that is why they were removed from these categories. There are also White Nationalism categories by country but I believe they mostly contained articles about the White Nationalists so when those categories got emptied, the White Nationalism ones became empty as well. Liz Read! Talk! 21:48, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you familiar with this subject and can help me see if the coming deletion of these categories will help end a redundancy or be a loss to the project? Thanks for any insight you can provide. Liz Read! Talk! 21:39, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upper Echelon Gamers: from GamerGate cringe to crypto force for good

So, I've been enjoying this guy's content on YouTube for years now, mostly game reviews, but also the occasional YT drama commentary or crypto exposé. But much of his early content (many years ago), I recently discovered, was pure GamerGate cringe, which I never picked up on otherwise. In the last year, though, he's shifted focus from gaming to crypto/cybercrime investigations.

And a few weeks ago, to highlight that shift, he even removed the Gamers part in his channel name to just Upper Echelon. Also a few weeks ago, he mentioned being in frequent communication with an FBI agent from the Cybercrime Division (whose full name / title he reveals, by permission I presume) to aid with evidence leading to the prosecution of crypto and other cybercriminals.

The mortal of the story: sometime, people grow up. So keep an eye out for his stuff, if you haven't already, because it's good stuff. I watched the video he released earlier today about the crimes (and general evil) of Alex and Krissy Mashinsky vis-à-vis the Celsius Network, which is definitely worth a watch: Machinations of the Mashinskys. El_C 20:36, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red November 2022

Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247


Online events:


See also:


Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:34, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:GorillaWarfare/PGP

Hello, seems like this expired roughly two years ago. 1234qwer1234qwer4 22:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:05, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 24 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Year in various calendars

Hi how are you? You've already edited in the past Template:Year in various calendars, I opened in discussion section a thread about a consensus for a flaw I identified in the template that goes back to 2006. There I explain better.

Best regards

Jvbignacio9 (talk) 20:58, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in December 2022

WiR Women who died in 2022
WiR Women who died in 2022
Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Remember to search slight spelling variations of your subject's name,
    like Katherine/Katharine or Elizabeth/Elisabeth, especially for historical subjects.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, GorillaWarfare. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Kurtis (talk) 16:51, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Alejandra Caraballo has been accepted

Alejandra Caraballo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 12:49, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vijaya Gadde

Maybe, you can flesh some decency into our article, since you have an interest around these topics? The current version is horrible. Ty, TrangaBellam (talk) 16:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great article

Molly White and the Crypto Skeptics. Nice. Cullen328 (talk) 21:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw this article as well. Nice job! I think it's going to be mentioned in the upcoming Signpost issue. Liz Read! Talk! 21:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Change Request (CENSORED.TV)

Notice of redirect discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion

I'm reaching out as I see that you created the redirect for CENSORED.TV, with the target being Gavin McInnes (thank you very much for that). I wanted to inform you that I created a Wiki for CENSORED.TV, at Censored.TV. I went ahead and edited the redirect to match the changes, but I'm unsure as to how to eliminate the extra step. This is my first redirect edit, so I may have missed a step or two. If I have, I apologize and ask that you can either do it, or show me what to do. I was able post it in the redirect forum, but I feel like that may have been an unnecessary step that's reserved for non-editors.

Thanks! Alan C. Machiavellian Gaddafi (talk) 01:24, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

'Tis the season

Happy Yuletide!

Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)

Schazjmd (talk) 18:10, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tis the 2022nd season

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2023!

Hello GorillaWarfare, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2023.
Happy editing,
Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 20:49, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Seasons Greetings

Whatever you celebrate at this time of year, whether it's Christmas or some other festival, I hope you and those close to you have a happy, restful time! Have fun, Donner60 (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2022 (UTC)}} [reply]

Donner60 (talk) 04:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas!

MBlaze Lightning (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

MBlaze Lightning (talk) 09:25, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas, GorillaWarfare!

Hello GorillaWarfare: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, TheSandDoctor Talk 18:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

From my family to yours: Merry Christmas! TheSandDoctor Talk 18:22, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red January 2023

Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Happy New Year, GorillaWarfare!

Happy New Year!

GorillaWarfare,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ⋠T⋡ 04:24, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deletion review for Lovejoy (band)

Georgebenee has asked for a deletion review of Lovejoy (band). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. —Alalch E.

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:COVID-19 edit notices with 1RR

A tag has been placed on Category:COVID-19 edit notices with 1RR indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:17, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:COVID-19 edit notices with Consensus Required

A tag has been placed on Category:COVID-19 edit notices with Consensus Required indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:18, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Editnotice that could be useful

Now, if you transclude {{Talk fringe|editnotice=yes}} on a page, you get this (see template):

Extended content

Use this for pages about fringe people/groups/theories. 137a (talk • edits) 14:17, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) @137a: I doubt the utility of this as an editnotice. It's not nearly direct enough and most editors will likely ignore it. Ones that more directly address issues like {{Nazism is not left wing editnotice}} or {{Railfan editnotice}} (less controversial example) tend to work better. This one is much more generic and just leads to banner blindness. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:26, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So what changes would you suggest to the template? Would you like a different header or a stronger wording at the start? Or maybe a complete rework? 137a (talk • edits) 13:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What particular problem are you intending to solve with this editnotice (and do you have examples of pages where you'd like to use it)? Elli (talk | contribs) 17:10, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This template is meant for fringe topics in general (people, groups, theories), and used both as an editnotice and a talk page notice. It would warn against trying to give false balance to some subjects. Maybe it needs stronger and more noticable wording? 137a (talk • edits) 13:43, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no need for an editnotice on most articles about fringe topics. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:20, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have to disagree. On any topic that isn't completely obscure, there is bound to be a bunch of people defending it, sometimes even by somewhat experienced users (GorillaWarfare would probably know what I'm talking about). Will the editnotice completely solve the problem? No. But I expect that with some changes we can get the message across to people who maybe can end up being productive contributors on other topics. We need to get the message across about what NPOV means. 137a (talk • edits) 15:11, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red in February 2023

Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • Explore Wikipedia for all variations of the woman's name (birth name,
    married name, re-married name, pen name, nickname)

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:27, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

A goat for you!

You now have a goat. Your rev-delling was exemplary! I greatly appreciate your choice of screenshot by the way; amazing film 😊

Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 17:31, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why thank you! GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 17:32, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Bobby Hull edit

I made an edit to his page that you removed partly because of a rule against edits towards living people, which he’s not he died today and it was quoted from a Moscow Times article that I referenced from 1998. I don’t understand why you removed it when neither rule was violated. Thank you. 2600:4040:7EF4:CF00:A05B:5FFC:DB0E:2323 (talk) 03:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLP also applies to people who are recently deceased (see WP:BDP). It's not sufficient to simply say "in a Moscow Times article", you need to provide a specific citation—and preferably not just the citation to the article with the quote, but to a secondary source that establishes the quote is noteworthy in the context of Hull's life. See WP:CITE if you need help citing sources. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:46, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:37, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My edit about Canadian culture

Hi, you just removed this edit of mine because you claim it wasn't "constructive". I realize now that it was maybe a bit rude to call Americans and Canadians "ignorant", but I think it still deserves a mention that Canada and the United States are the two most culturally identical countries in the world. How should I phrase that in a "constructive" way? 2.104.86.19 (talk) 00:34, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Find a reliable source presenting this viewpoint, and perhaps review WP:NPOV to familiarize yourself with how to properly reflect statements of opinion. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 00:35, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

do you have a bias?

do editors have any bias? 71.223.136.6 (talk) 07:15, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Every human being has biases. I'm not really sure what you're asking here. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 15:56, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HQ (video game)

I'm not sure what is going on here. There appear to be at least three different editors of HQ and who appear to be former employees or something. They appear to be coordinating editing (see Talk:HQ (video game)#HQ Trivia Player, and Website Takeover) and are replacing content with questionable sources. Some appear to be screen shots that they have been uploaded themselves. Suggestions? I'm overwhelmed here.

Thanks Adakiko (talk) 06:32, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heya. Looks like this is over now—I had logged off and so am only just seeing it. In the future I'd recommend bringing issues like this to WP:AIV or WP:ANEW for a faster reply. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 21:32, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You missed all the action! It escalated and went to wp:ANI#Nonsense_at_HQ_(video_game) for a knock-down, drag-out. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:38, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red March 2023

Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Mobile phone readers may only see the article "lead" – take some time to make it shine!
    Include something to keep people reading.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red April 2023

Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:52, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Proposed deletion of John Jackson (hacker)

Notice

The article John Jackson (hacker) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Requested deletion by article subject for privacy reasons, and a lack of public interest on subject's work for several years, with the last major update being in 2021. I would like to take a privacy approach to my public presence and request that this page is deleted as it would be the first step to ensuring the Google panel on my name gets deleted as well. In the past, I believe that there was a public interest in my actions. However, my lack of social media and the now defunct Sakura Samurai have resulted in a much smaller pool of individuals in high-level media interested in my presence, and I believe a deletion event would be justified. This page isn't actively maintained on all of the hacking related work I conduct, and the work that is conducted typically only attracts the interest of non-wikipedia reputable sources, further justification for a lack of public interest.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Trabant edit rejected

Moved to Talk:Trabant § Trabant edit rejected
 – GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 22:52, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dana Rivers edit

The addition of "mass murderer" to Dana Rivers' article and the change from "transgender advocate" to "transgender rights activist" was an edit by an account named "Actually, TWAM". Does reverting that also need to go through the talk page? Lekale35 (talk) 01:20, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have issues with those changes, feel free to raise them on the talk page. However, it was a fairly insignificant edit in terms of the changes that remained — the article already described her as being accused of multiple murders, and as a "transgender advocate", so the changes really were to update that she'd been convicted (which is sourced) and replace "advocate" with a synonym. There were certainly other issues with that edit, which were reasonably reverted. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:26, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So, at what point exactly can I edit the article to make those changes? Lekale35 (talk) 02:00, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Join the conversation on the talk page and come to a consensus for a change. See Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle#Discuss. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:02, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No response. What would you suggest? Lekale35 (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A little patience. Not everyone logs on daily. I've also pinged the folks involved in the discussion to date so they're aware it's coming up again: [6]. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 16:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

LWO edit

I just noticed you reverted my edit on Latino World Order. I have added the years_active parameters. 76.69.130.150 (talk) 02:07, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any change needs a reliable source to verify it. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:08, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. Here's your 🥤 76.69.130.150 (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red May 2023

Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Use the Google translate app and camera on your phone to translate text from an article or book

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red - June 2023

Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

Facebook | Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GorillaWarfare/Archive_22&oldid=1162920983"