User talk:Gogo Dodo/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 20

Amit Sharma

i want to write a new page about mr amit sharma founder of logicsphere —Preceding unsigned comment added by Viks842k (talk • contribs) 05:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Republic of Giambi

Could you please re-instate the Republic of Giambi, it is non-offensive and all sources have been cited.

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatGooglyMoogly93 (talk • contribs) 11:57, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Can you be specific in your request for 3rd party sources? I just need an example or two so I can see what I need to work to get.

Thanks alot. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GreatGooglyMoogly93 (talk • contribs) 18:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I am also involved in the task of getting the Republic of Giambi re-instated onto Wikipedia. If I am under the correct assumption, it just needs to include 3rd party sources to not be consistently deleted? Are we supposed to have the graphs and charts clearly visible in a picture format rather than a link? Any other suggestions would be super! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimbeemerz444 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

for removing the vandalism from my talk page! Cheers, --Catgut (talk) 15:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

removing profile

how do i cancel my account? Pivanz28 (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

The Republic of Wump

The User:Wumpism page is what we are doing in school. We have created a little club witch is doing simulations. We need to have the pageWumpism (talk) 00:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Email

Replied :) Daniel (talk) 14:14, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Something strange is still afoot

Can you check Tata Nano for me? Not sure if I'm stuck with my cached version or whether it's current. I only ask because the "File links" listed for File:Babypamper.jpg still points to the Tata Nano page. ←Spidern→ 17:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I have purged the article. All seems to be well. ←Spidern→ 17:47, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Survivor revert

Looks like it. I'd wanted to revert all of the user's edits. Thanks for following up! --Maxamegalon2000 22:33, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Found Myself With Something Interesting

...at walking floor. The owner rewrote, replacing all the content with stuff about copyright: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Walking_floor&oldid=280682786 and is now saying on the talk page that the entire article is a copyright violation. Pretty positive you can't copyright a verb-noun combo, but decided to ask you, since I'm not much of a law expert. -WarthogDemon 01:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi Gogo Dodo:

What makes you thing that 70.171.199.18's edit waw a test and not vandalism? --HarryZilber (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2009 (UTC) You earlier wrote on talk:70.171.199.18:

April 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Bagel worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Giambipedia

Could you please re-instate the posting of Giambipedia. It is non-offensive and all sources have been cited. It is a actual place where followers of Giambigarchy meet and discuss important things. As mentioned to another dipshit moderator, I do not appreciate being held down by the "man." I believe we live in a country where we have the right to 5th amendment and freedom of speech. You have no right deprive me of my constitutional rights. Giambi is GOD (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Ray Murphy

Excuse me but why did you delete the "Ray Murphy" entry? And was it about the same Ray Murphy I was thinking of (chap who does research into astrology)? Would it be OK for me to start one? Wombat140 (talk) 19:31, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:03, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Nick Adenhart

I added two external links that discuss the subject's background before his professional career began, and you callously removed them. The reasons given for the removals are inadequate, and a more detailed explanation of your actions is expected. The links were added in hope that the information in them can be incorporated into the entry.The Ink Daddy! (talk) 21:22, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I'll just put this in the same section, why are you removing the Angels navbox? I know he's deceased but he's still on the inactive roster. I don't remember from Daryl Kyle what the procedures are for how they can remove him from the roster completely, but for now he's still on the 40 man. --Muboshgu (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I replied on mine. Great job keeping up with some of these well-meaning but inappropriate edits on the Adenhart page today. --Muboshgu (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I checked the existing references/links and still think that they only gloss over the subject's pre-professional record that were discussed in depth in the articles that you erased. I really hope that you at least scanned the pieces instead of just wiping them out with one stroke because doing the latter would be just unprofessional. I strongly disagree with your actions, but I'm not in the mood to get into a full-blown debate, considering that a good man died tragically.The Ink Daddy! (talk) 23:19, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:35, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Survivor Tocantins Tribe Colors?

Hi, Gogo Dodo. I was the anonymous user with the I.P. beginning with 72 who was just editing the Survivor Tocantins page a few minutes ago... Sorry for not leaving a message explaining why I needed to change the colors of the tribes. The colors I substituted for the old ones are the actual pixel colors on the Survivor Buff pictures on CBS Store (www.cbsstore.com), which are not photos, but actual images of the official designs and colors. And the color values I managed to calculate through OS X Color Picker, was:

Jalapao: #B90005; Timbira: #1E1C21; and Merge Tribe: #006730.

I noticed a slight difference in the colors before I edited, so I did it with the intention of making this article more accurate.

Thank you for reading.

W.W.

P.S. And I would also appreciate it if you let your fellow admin, Maxamegalon2000 be informed with this message... It seems that I can't leave him/her one on his/her Talk Page.

I checked the images in question for the two buffs and they are probably not the best thing to color pick as the images are dithered when zoomed in, not solid. So the colors you selected are not entirely accurate. As for Maxamegalon2000, you should be able to leave a comment on his user talk page as it is not protected. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:17, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I picked the colors at the most solid place I could find in the enlarged images -- in the longer vertical stripes, and only the darker, more saturated of the two colors (one's slightly lighter than the other). I still think that at least this would be more accurate than the previous version of the article, especially Timbira's color, which, even in the show, is easy to tell that it was not completely black, for the eagles on the border of the buffs are darker in shade than the buff background. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.10.114.16 (talk • contribs)

Alright, but I would still recommend bringing up any color changes on the Talk page and get a consensus on the before you make the change. After editing many of the past seasons, I have found that setting the tribe colors is very contentious issue. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:29, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Disagree with changes to Shopping Cart Software

We disagree with the changes to the shopping cart software page. All of the edits we made were useful and there was no second agenda. The article "as is" really does not provide much value at all. For example, many users have requested links to current directories that list Shopping Cart Software programs. The one there now, which links to the Open Directory Project, is not useful since that list is incomplete and outdated. We had researched and added several useful links. In addition, the list of pros and cons to Licensed vs. Hosted solutions was useful and accurate. I don't understand why removing it would improve the article. To the contrary, you removed information that can certainly be useful. Earlyimpact (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:37, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Steve flint

SO we have a brother with this name and we want to write a page about him. is that so wrong? (and by the way, we are not just a couple of 8 year olds) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Computerdesk (talk • contribs) 03:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:48, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps a temp semi-protect of Versus22's talk page?

Since the first thing they're doing is crapping all over his page, the fact that they're named accounts shouldn't matter. HalfShadow 04:30, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm good at that. I often tend to be in the right place at the right time or think the same thing at the same time. Scares the piss out of some people. HalfShadow 04:39, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Yahoo Answers

Hello,

I would like to leave an edit at the following page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo!_Answers

It has been removed a few times. Could you please tell me what I should do (corrections, placement, etc), in order to ensure that it is not removed?...

Thanks!

More often than not, the reason questions and answers are removed are not as a result of Yahoo Answers staff, but of it's users. At times, the violation email you receive is automatically generated, and based on what the user(s) selects as a reason when he/she reports you (chatting/insulting others/spamming etc), this is the reason that will appear within the Yahoo violation email as well.

If enough users report a question/answer, it will be removed automatically, sometimes within minutes. Some people have multiple accounts, as Y!A permits up to 10 accounts per IP address. With that said, if a person with several accounts also happens to be a Report Troll, he or she is able to do as they please and create problems for others. Persons who abuse the report button are documented, and over time will lose their reporting power. Also, Yahoo Answers keeps track of its members Thumbs Up/Down ratio automatically, which in turn can also effect ones reporting validity.

Yahoo Answers does not have the man power to look into every reported question/answer, hence the auto-violation email. Based on the experiences of many users...deleted questions/answers are usually a direct result of vindictive angry users with nothing better to do than troll and report other users, sometimes resulting in account suspensions.

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:01, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

User:75.157.147.51

• 75.157.147.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

I suggest you read this diff.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Or nevermind, I should have read the times, you warned him just one minute after he did that.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 06:02, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Central Asian Shepherd Dog

Please check Central Asian Shepherd Dog history and discussion. Thank you. --Afru (talk) 22:11, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:57, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

deletion

bro you just deleted the article i posted before i even had a chance to finish it. i was just wondering what's going on? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deltax92 (talk • contribs) 05:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Howdy

Thanks for covering my back with my talk page there. What was that about, anyway? Somebody trying to expose my IP and location and getting both wrong, again? Ah well. The ire of the inarticulate is a badge of honor I'm glad to receive. But back to the point, thanks for looking out for me there. - Vianello (talk) 08:11, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Well, if he's doing as shoddy a job of it as he did last time I saw it, nobody has anything to worry about. - Vianello (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Returning the appreciation

Looks like we had each others' backs there. Cheers!Monkey Bounce (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Mascot #$(*&%^ Guy...

Man, I tell you...I just give up. Short of rangeblocking each and every one of his IPs or his becoming incapacitated is going to keep this little freak off of this site, so we'll just have to tag and bag the socks and hopefully take a break for another couple of months. I locked down his pet Eloise article for the next six months and I'll do likewise to every one he decides to mess up from now on. If there's any good thing to be said about him, he's consistent in his choice of articles and he'll be easy to lock out for at least a little while, assuming he doesn't suddenly decide to switch to other topics. So, now that we're at the start of baseball season, Eloise will be safe until roughly the World Series.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:11, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Seen, me breda, seen. I think Eloise does not agree with what MG is doing to her articles... Blake Gripling (talk) 06:05, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

hello

Hello,

I recently tried to post an article on the the hip hop artist stef money and am not sure why it was removed any help to have this resolved would be great

How is it inappropriate. please help me with this article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Latescreening (talk • contribs) 07:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

thanks again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Latescreening (talk • contribs) 07:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

You've been a Wikipedian for 3 years today. Happy third birthday! May your next three years be just as great. – Quadell ^(talk) 22:18, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Happy WikiBirthday! Keep up the good work, rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 23:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

speedy deletion of AY Online

Hi there

A novice wipikedia person requires a little guidence...

We simply wanted to highlight what we do, we carefully did not put loads of links into the page. Could we write a review of the site rather than an advertising page.

We are just concerned that our town needs community based organisations like ours, especially to help folks unite together. We do not wish to turn this into an advertising site but simply to point out that we cover all areas of our town life.

Things are so splintered with one part of local government doing one thing and another doing something else that new people to our town don't always knwo where to go for what. We are not the big money grabbibg organisation but a small virtually non-profit, organisation that exists soley to help folk in the town navigate online to the different businesses and so on that exist.

Please advise if and how we can include ourselves here or if you'd perfer we simply did not.

Thanks so much for any help or advice you can give  :-)

regards

Nuthatch

Nuthatch99 (talk) 20:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

removal of AY Online form the Aylesbury page ??

Hi there,

Thanks for your kind message to us. I have read this all and am happy with what you have said. However, I have one question. Whilst AY online can't have it's own page that I understand but we are well known in our town and it IS A FACT that Mix 96 is the radio station, Bucks Herald is the local paper and AY Online is the online information web site that covers all areas of town life. It is true that there are some other town information sites run by the council and one or two others but none cover all areas of our town except AY Online. I know this is a self proclaimed fact, but it is the case.

Please can you help me understand why this has been removed from the Aylesbury Article ?

If it was on the 'basis of no advertising' then why do the radio station and newspaper remain ?

It could be argued that Mix 96 is 'advertising' since BBC 3 counties radio also covers Aylesbury, or the Bucks Herald is 'advertising', as Aylesbury is also covered by other printed news publications.

I am simply trying to understand the boundaries and the basis for removing all traces of AY Online when we provide a FREE service like Wikipedia and our 'one line' inclusion on the Aylesbury page was FACTUAL and not a huge advertising slogan.

We have been going for over two years and are pretty well established here, so we are not a brand new organisation. We are simply not well known outside our town so there is little material on the web or in print about us. This is due to the fact that we do not bother to engage or promote ourselves outside of the context of Aylesbury.

Any help would be appreciated.

Please can we simply add to the Aylesbury article

...paper ...radio staion. AY Online is the local Online information service that covers all aspects of town life.

regards and thanks

Nuthatch

Nuthatch99 (talk) 07:42, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Message from Otinoved

I know this will make seem like a troll but could I please write an article about myself? I know I'm not famous or significant or anything ,but loosen up. I know it's your job to I guess make sure wikipedia is a relevant source and apparently since I'm not in the encyclopedia I don't need an article but I always thought it would be really cool, you know, just to show people. I know you're probably gonna be pissy about this but I just really want my own article.

P.S. how do you take the articles down so fast? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otinoved (talk • contribs) 07:24, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:35, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Mohammed Ben Sulayem

Thank you Dodo.

I'm relevantly new to Wiki and it took a while for me to understand content editing/adding policies.

I'd appreciate if corrections to the following para on Mohammed Ben Sulayem are done:

Original para reads:

"Sulayem is President of the Automobile and Touring Club of the UAE (ATCUAE) and as such has been appointed by the FIA and FIM as the official representative to oversee all motorsports events in the UAE. He is also Chairman of the Organising Committee for the UAE Desert Challenge, a race that he launched in 1991. The event has since become the final round of the FIA Cross-Country Rally World Cup."

The fact is:

the UAE Desert Challenge is now the Abu Dhabi Desert Challenge and, it is no more the final round of the FIA Cross-Country Rally World Cup, but the first round of the FIA Cross-Country Rally World Cup.

I understand as an employee of the ATCUAE of which Mr. Ben Sulayem is President, it would be inappropriate of me to edit Wiki contents on him. Given this, I'd appreciate if the suggested changes are made at the earliest to reflect the factual position of the Desert Challenge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonyatcuae (talk • contribs) 13:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:02, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Message from TomTolkien

Your message to me:
Regarding your linking to Woodleigh School Please stop linking to the Woodleigh School article on various town articles in the region. Normally, schools are only linked in the town or city where it is located or where a significant portion of it student population originates from. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

1 - Woodleigh School serves all these towns and the pupils live in these towns. This is Woodleigh's catchment area.
2 - You have deleted many items completely unrelated to links!

You have systematically removed every edit I've made in the last hour. This is extremely childish behaviour.

The suggestion of spam is very short sighted and suggests some vested interest in your action perhaps?

At the very least perhaps you might have bothered to ASK before deleting in such a thoughtless and haphazard fashion.

I notice a number of other schools choose to link the same way. Also, So what is you problem exactly?

I feel that any further action by yourself and any failure to immediately reinstate these edits would surely warrant a formal complaint to Wikipedia.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomtolkien (talk • contribs) 21:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Please explain your actions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomtolkien (talk • contribs) 21:44, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Message from Heyguysimcool

SORRY ILL STOP —Preceding unsigned comment added by Heyguysimcool (talk • contribs) 02:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Wrong information

Lots of errors in what was written. The guys deserves a second chance. Many facts were incorrect and confusing to the public eye. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minx09 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

ok fair enough, but still a lot of it was bogus and i would suggest you got your facts right before publishing. its kind of disgraceful so my actions could be deemed justifiable if you consider what humanity is coming to! Falsification of data is a crime but so is the lack of human integrity towards others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Minx09 (talk • contribs) 02:16, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Request

Could you please do a quick view of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Collect. Since RFCs rely on all parties agreeing to any findings, and are nonbinding, and Collect has made it clear he will not abide by any restrictions requested, could you please close it as a blatant waste of everyone's time. The discussion has reverted to all involved parties mud-slinging at each other, and is in no way productive. If anything, it is disruptive.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 20:43, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

PS - I did not mean to click minor edit. It was right next to save.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 20:44, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks for your time.— Dædαlus ^Contribs 05:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thought you might find this amusing...

You've become a very inspirational leader to the SPA's: [1] --Clay Collier (talk) 08:05, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:31, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Ning Controversies

Hello!

Wanted to check in with you on the Ning Controversies section. A while back I flagged this section for Kollision [2]. Kollision made some edits and posted a notice about the dispute here [3]. Then you got involved and offered your 2 cents.

Unfortunately, constructive edits have been consistently reverted by one or more users[4]. The problems with the current version are pretty well documented[5].

At this point, I'm a little pessimistic about achieving consensus here. That said, I do passionately want to see an unbiased, well-sourced section. Do you have any thoughts on how to make this happen?

Thanks --Kangaru99 (talk) 19:41, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. You may want to check out Ning Talk; there is an edit war going on and it's getting fairly violent. Also, this contributor [6] seems to be a meatpuppet for User:Muggzzi, although I haven't done any serious investigation. The sad thing is this edit war is over minor details to a section that needs a complete overhaul. In my perfect world the article would be restored to a previous good version and protected somehow from the unproductive edits of a few editors. I don't know if that's realistic. Kangaru99 (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I've attempted to centralize conversation here.[7] It would be great if you'd review this dispute and help resolve it by weighing in whether Charting Stocks is a reliable source. While there are multiple issues beyond WP:RS, this seems to be the biggest point of contention at the moment. Thanks, Kangaru99 (talk) 22:55, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Nasty Band in Go-go

Hi there - I noticed that someone has added in a large new section of Go-go and that you and I have both reverted the section. It has a fair amount of hype and commercial material. However, it does seem that there is at least some press about the band - I found a cover story from the Washington City Paper from 2002. Anyway, I started a discussion section at Talk:Go-go#New_information_about_bands and maybe you could put in your opinion there. Thanks, --Larrybob (talk) 19:47, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Now I'm reading the article [8] and realizing it's not about Nasty Band, but instead mentions Nasty Girls. My searches for other press info seemed to only turn up self-promotion.--Larrybob (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:46, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Jose Homepage

Gogo Dogo, please undelete my homepage so I can get my text and save it and then you can delete it. My life has gone downhill since you deleted my page and I am deppresed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JoseGonzalez66 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I just want the text so I can save it to my computer because I wrote something good. Is there a way to just find what was on that page? --JoseGonzalez66 (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:35, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

You can delete it now. --JoseGonzalez66 (talk) 22:28, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Message from Hector So

Dear Gogo Dodo, I apology what I mentioned your name in my comment related to the issue of Pings Xiao. In my mind I respect the people who speak for the public and reality. Since I'm a new user in Wikipedia; if I did anything that affected you or your reputation, here I said I'm very sorry. And if you give more chance to communicate you, I'm happy to learn from you. Please suggest to me how to solve my problem which gave you a lot of headache. Remove the comment I made ??Hectorso (talk) 03:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Hector So

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:12, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

--Thanks your info Gogo that helps me to understand the duty of a Wiki editor. Hectorso (talk) 07:30, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

deletion

Hello, I note that you have deleted my recently submitted page The Grand Order of Water Rats. I am confused about this. Please be assured that this organization is a long standing, highly repected charity and all the facts I stated are true and can be checked on the website www.gowr.net It really is important for The GOWR to be included in Wikipedia. Please reconsider and reinstate the page. Many thanks, Yours sincerely Mike Vinden (user) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike Vinden (talk • contribs) 08:11, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:22, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Survivor Gabon

I will not stop editing the table header. Fine. Only Survivor Tocantins will not be changing since this season has not yet ended in a moment. Survivor Gabon has already been done. The rest of the seasons. I changed the table format for the contestants already. Thank you. Raymarcbadz (talk) 03:08, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:18, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Manhunt International 2009

Why did you return to its original table format? I want this table to be more vibrant and fascinating. Okay. Thank you. Is it okay with you with this format or you really despise it??

Raymarcbadz (talk) 11:17, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:31, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Losing Sun

I think I've come across a walled garden of articles, the main one being Losing Sun, but I'm uncertain. My reaction is to get all of these into a single AFD, but I want a second opinion first. -WarthogDemon 23:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Explain?

Hi there,

I have just been informed that an article on Jayce Lewis has been deleted. and that the article was deleted by yourself?

May i ask for what reason? also if you need any proof of who he is we can provide all information.

Many thanks

Editor —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor1978 (talk • contribs) 15:48, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion

Hi, My name is Josh, from the band All Falls Down. You recently deleted the page we made for our band. If you have the time, please leave me a message explaining why. Thank you.

-Josh —Preceding unsigned comment added by Allfallsdownband (talk • contribs) 23:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:34, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Oh... okay.... thanks!

-Josh

Crazy vandalism

Can you delete my talk page entirely I dont really need it and it has become a log of sexual references and vandalism that is both pornographic and insulting. The poster is not going to stop and will simply use other IP's and user names to continue with his pornographic and homophobic rants. It is upsetting that Wikipedia allows this type of content to show up in the history where anyone even children can search and be exposed to such graphic comments. It is clear that this poster and his allies are simply trying to corrupt the nasal irrigation article and contineu to attach me in the most ugly manner. I am just ignoring the comments.

I would very much appreciate your help if you could help to remove this blight.--Grockl (talk) 03:01, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

semi-protect

Thank you for your help can we semi-protect for a period of 6 momnths like i have seen some others?? thx --Grockl (talk) 06:12, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:15, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the work you do. For someone fairly new to this and not fully familiar with all the in's and out of the wikipedia community it is an amazing place but with some ugly members. Thanks to all of you admin folks that work so hard to try and keep it relevent and constructive. I too have at times been less than constructive and took the bait but now realize it is best to monitor and advise but will ignore these posts not worth my time.--Grockl (talk) 06:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Call for support of an AFD

Sorry for removing the comment on Talk:Survivor: Tocantins, and I understand the reasoning. After reading it again, and after reading Wikipedia:CANVASS, it seems to me like it should have been removed considering the wording and the placement. However, I'm sure you know more about this than I do, and I didn't indicate that as my initial reasoning in my edit summary. If you have any thoughts on this, let me know, otherwise no problem and I will try to refrain from removing anything but vandalism comments in the future. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

It's alright, it is no big deal either way. I don't think the original note was an attempt at canvassing as I believe it was only posted once. No worries. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

shane cross.

dude why did you delete Shane cross's page. he was my fav skater and i was violently depressed when he died. at least he could live on as a wiki page what was wrong with it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.94.134 (talk) 02:17, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I deleted the article twice, once in 2007 and once in 2009. In the 2009 revision, there was not meaningful content. The 2007 deletion was due to the lack of notability per notability guidelines for inclusion on Wikipedia. You are welcome to create and account restart an article about him, but please make sure that he meets the aforementioned notability guidelines. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:41, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Julius Mampara

Why did you delete the Julius Mampara article? It conformed to all Wikipedias rules —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius.mampara (talk • contribs) 20:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:40, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Well I suggest you do a google search for 'Julius Mampara'...he is very notable. May I request that the article is reinstated or have a second opinion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius.mampara (talk • contribs) 20:48, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:53, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

See, its good when you do some research. However that page does not have any links to the Google Site page which I had in my article. There does not seem to be a way to add this site either. Can you do this for me. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius.mampara (talk • contribs) 21:18, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Removing links as spam

Hello Gogo Dodo,

Just trying to understand why a manufacturer of a product can have a page, but I can't post a link to where the product can be purchased on line (authorized source)? It seems someone reading about the product would want to know where they could get it?

Not trying to hassle you, just want to understand how it works.

--Paws222 (talk) 22:31, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:21, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

AN thread

I've started an AN thread regarding a matter where you were previously involved. You may wish to comment. Durova^Charge! 16:05, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:54, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Tamara Johnson-George

I don't know if you watch Tamara Johnson-George, but the last IP edit summary was somewhat 'uncivil' and I would like to avoid engaging in an edit war. Plastikspork (talk) 21:27, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Never mind. It appears the IP reverted him/herself. Plastikspork (talk) 21:29, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Brian Beissel

Why was the Brian page deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Umd2512 (talk • contribs) 23:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Garamounds

Are you one of the Garamounds? It certainly seems like it, considering you are suppressing information about them.

GaramoundSpecialist (talk) 01:56, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Tom.jer007

Can you protect the user and talk page of User:Tom.jer007? He's already been blocked for using his page as a chat page (the only edits he's ever made) yet he continues. The admin who blocked didn't block that for some reason. -WarthogDemon 15:57, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. The person (or people) have now moved to User talk:Themmadi. I'm sure of this since the IP address User:61.111.142.210 that used to talk at the first talk page has now moved over there. -WarthogDemon 19:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

They both hopped over to User:Panjara. -WarthogDemon 17:19, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Message from Arthursmay

Don't delete my work! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthursmay (talk • contribs) 21:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

RE:

me very very very very very very very very very very very sorry. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua Cha (talk • contribs) 22:03, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Charmong. Simply charming.  :)

Say, you weren't planning on visiting the place anytime soon...? Hope not! No shortage of idiots on this site, no? --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:22, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Storiann

Why did you delete Storiann's wikipedia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ragemaging (talk • contribs) 08:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:21, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

James Peacock (Born 1992)

Thanks for deleting that garbage .. however, there is another one. --T'Shael MindMeld 23:05, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. :) --T'Shael MindMeld 23:08, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:13, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Orice Jenkins

I would like to know why you are trying to delete my article. It does not meet any of the criteria for speedy deletion and it should not be deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orice (talk • contribs) 03:21, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:26, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Orice Jenkins meets criteria numbers 9 and and 12 in the article you showed me. If I put this information in my article, will you refrain from deleting it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Orice (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

hi

how come u have deleted the sangehra crime gang page we need it up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.94.187.250 (talk) 16:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

The article was deleted because it was moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sanghera crime gang where it was subsequently denied. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:16, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Mario Maurer and Witwisist Hiranyawongkul

Excuse me? Why did you delete my edited message about them? That is the only way Mario and Witwisit will know about me.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnwayne3 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:58, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh, ok, Thanks anyway. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnwayne3 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hello - the IP address 82.2.17.107 has vandalised our page a couple of times. After the most recent one, I noted that you were editing at about the same time as me. If that was to help defeat the vandal, many thanks to you! I have left them a warning on their talk page. I am very new to this so hope it has been done correctly. If there is a way of blocking them from our page, I'd love to hear about it!

Thank you. SPiT LiKE THiS (talk) 20:53, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:21, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

What are you doing??

I would like to know why you are saying my article is an attack or whatever, i am doing this for my brother Cesar Daniel Morales whom i believe should be recognized for his accomplishments!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Eloymorales (talk • contribs) 01:57, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:01, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Elca Solutions Article

How should I start an article about a company then? I helped a friend of mine start the Executive National Bank article, and it was not removed. Is it that I am or am not including something I should not? Your comment on the delete log was not very clear to me. It is relevant because it is a company that exists in the public domain just as any other small company that is found on wikipedia.

It is frustrating that I took a good amount of my time for you to delete the page altogether. Is there any trace of that page that you could send to me so I do not have to start from scratch?

Paraplegicemu (talk) 07:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:31, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Quick Question

You deleted the Maximes page? Why? François de La Rochefoucauld is certainly a notable (if quite dead) writer, and Maximes (English Maxims) is best-known work.

It certainly has a place in any good encyclopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.38.77.120 (talk) 15:21, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

The article that I deleted did not have anything to do with François de La Rochefoucauld's book. Instead, it was an article about a non-notable nightclub in Wigan. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

John Wall (basketball)

Do you think you can restore this page because for some reason someone deleted it and he is a notable player. Ice (talk) 23:43, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:51, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

request to have Emily_Wells unlocked

I noticed that you are among two editors who deleted a poorly-sourced, perhaps plagiarized, article on musician Emily Wells. The other one is on a "Wikipedia break", so I hope you can help me. I have created an article which contains notable and reliable sources such as NPR, Spin Magazine, and the Wall Street Journal, and details her releases, touring activities, and collaborations, in an attempt to demonstrate that she is indeed notable enough to be on Wikipedia.

This new page can be found here:

[[9]]

I would like to request that the Emily_Wells page be unlocked so I can make my version live. If you feel my article is still not sufficient, please give me any feedback you feel might help me improve it to the point where it could become a public Wikipedia entry.

Thank you for considering my request. -Rehjanis (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks so much for your help and your suggestions, which I have gratefully implemented. -Rehjanis (talk) 03:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:25, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Message from Andrewwisne

Mr. Gogo Dodo-

Wikepedia pages exist formany former Notre Dame players for simply being that. That is notable in itself. I have put hang on and rewritten the article. There are many reason it is relevant and notable. Andy was the subject of a first place story about overcomming bi polar disorder, a concussion, two near fatal car accidents, being a former starting defensive lineman for Notre Dame. Being a football player for Notre Dame is noteable in itelf but there are so many aspects ( including storys- LA Times 2002, and "out of the Darkness" in 2007) that comprehending it all might lead to skimming the information or not realizing the importance of the information. Andy has been through hell and back and this information is plainly relevant and noteable. Overcomming the odds, overcomming depression, the Story of an individual transitioning from one notable area to another after overcomming impossible odds, and playing football or Notre Dame. Try not to be subjective as to whether you like the person or not. In a nuetral point of view notability can be compared to thousands of existing wikepedia articles. (1) Notre Dame football player.

Being a Notre Dame football player is notable in itself such examples as in articles-

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evan_Sharpley http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Tate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asaph_Schwapp —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewwisne (talk • contribs) 04:35, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Deletion of Stoneboats article?

Hi, why did you delete the Stoneboats article? The A7 section says that you can propose an article for deletion, not just delete it. I should at least be given a warning or some time to improve the article, not just wipe it out for ever. I find it troubling that all the content is gone from the history logs even though wikipedia has a content record of every vandalism out there. Please, ease up on the fast delete key, especially if there is no way to recover the content, mkay? I am not just some IP out there, but a user that has contributed over 100 changes in almost three years.

FYI, this restaurant has historical value, even though I failed to mention that when I created the article. That information will be added. Part of the restaurant is housed in a 1840-built stone house, which is only 6 years older than the Bronte village itself. Ninel (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks.

Thank you reverting the vandalism on my talk page. - Eugene Krabs (talk) 00:59, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:01, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Removing Notable residents:Amroha Syed Mehdi Raza Taqvi

Hi,

As you edit this link http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amroha

Notable residents: Rm, long list of non-notable people with no Wikipedia articles

I have to inform you that Syed Mehdi Raza Taqvi Built Azakhana Wazeer Un Nisa Danishmandan and same detail you can check on below link on wiki

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Azakhana_Wazeer_Un_Nisa_Danishmandan_Amroha.jpg

So i have request you to please add Syed Mehdi Raza Taqvi in Notable residents at Amroha page detail.

Thanks waiting for positively reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raza 7226 (talk • contribs) 12:23, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:07, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

I think I love you...

Seriously though, what a fantastic idea to initiate a quick CU. I'll add the other accounts right now. Thanks for the update. Nice thing is, I can work while keeping an eye out for garbage like this guy does so often. It just has to stop. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

I see that now. I should have noticed that you added the last three "main" accounts. Instead, it looked like a main account and a couple of examples of sleepers, so I added the latest sleepers to the report. I'll remove them since it's obvious they're all from the same latest source. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:16, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Damn the luck; someone just rolled back the request. Said that wasn't the place for a sock check. Nothing like following procedure when our little fiend in San Diego has been running roughshod for alomst five years. Gonna sign off...I'm not a happy camper. PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Good for you! They say to be bold around here. Glad you were! PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:59, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Wisne (2nd nomination)

I have rewritten Andy Wisne in a neutral, encyclopedic fashion. You wrote that "If I'm wrong and he really is notable, then presumably someone other than himself will inevitably be inspired to write about him." Your comment inspired me to rewrite the article. I hope you can take a look at it and reevaluate your position at the AfD. Cunard (talk) 08:18, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

haidong gumdo article

I'm quite sorry and i don't want to be ofensive, but the original article on wikipedia about haidong gumdo is of very low quality, and it's quite incomplete, I've worked a while on this new article and finaly posted it today, I would be very happy if you could review my article before trashing it, I know it still needs of a little work, but I'm sure you'll find it much better than the one already posted, thanks and I'll be waiting for a reply

I'll post the whole article on the discussion of haidong gumdo —Preceding unsigned comment added by Budablade (talk • contribs) 07:03, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I have emailed you to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 16:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

Eric Nelson (scholar)

• I am not writing to object to the fact that you took this page down. I am writing to object to your discourtesy.
• I logged in a few minutes ago to take the page down, having decided that the scholar is still too young. I have had a glimpse of his next book, it is powerful and he will have his page in a year or too, when the general circulation intellectual journals have had a chance to notice the impact he is already having in the scholarly literature.
• However, would it not be more collegial to write to the person who put the page up, wait a few days, and give the author of a page a day or two to think notability over and concur that it is too early for a page to go up, or to improve the page.
• The avidity with which people take down new pages (this young man is after all, already a scholar with a notable career, albeit stil in its early stages and not noticed by the general public - this was, in other words, obviously not a vanity page) and act aggressively in other ways makes Wikipedia a very unpleasant place. this, in my opinion, is one reason why people are reluctant to participate, which, in turn, explains why the calibre of the encyclopedia is so paltry once you get beyond the experimental sciences, popular culture, and contemporary politics, which can really be very good.
• end of rant.Historicist (talk) 21:18, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:08, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Monroe Middle School in California

Nice Job. OtisJimmyOne 00:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Spaceman7Spiff

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my page and reverting. Cheers. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 08:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Caveat Emptor

Information on Airliners.net "Other Controversy" was already there I just added to it. You must be an "A.Net" member who supports the moderators who engage in these activities. Dfwaviator (talk) 00:27, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:04, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Cheers

I kinda expected some amusing rebuttals. Please accept to help quench your thirst, with my thanks.--VS ^talk 08:12, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:34, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Message from Lockbox7

sorry - thought i was in my sandbox... was in the wrong window. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lockbox7 (talk • contribs) 20:58, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Piratesmackkk

Hi. Nice work banning that one so swiftly. Sorry I welcomed them; I didn't know the history until later. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  21:49, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:56, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Thanks

You're welcome! Abce2|AccessDenied 01:43, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

dog

ill create whatever articles i want

even my dog shelby!!

so ha! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennischamp533320 (talk • contribs) 02:37, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:39, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: Thanks

Heh, no problem, glad to help. :) –Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:44, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

admin

how do you become an admin, or are you just a robot? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennischamp533320 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

For your cool head

I hereby award you this vandal whacking stick. I have never seen any editor who has kept his cool under such harrasment like you, so I think you deserve this.--Abce2|AccessDenied 02:52, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, they aren't very creative. You're welcome.--Abce2|AccessDenied 14:54, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Who made you the Wiki Police?

Most of the paragraph that you deleted was already there. I just added to it. Who made you the wiki police. As far as the information, it is fact. The moderators are volunteers, they are not regulated, and Demand media will continue to charge for services after a member has been banned. Fact, Fact Fact. Go read the TOS. I am posting fact. Leave me alone. You can delete, I have it saved, so I will cut and paste and put it back. Dfwaviator (talk) 16:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Please Delete the "Welcome" message you left me.

I don't appreciate you sending me a snippy "welcome to Wikipedia message, and then promptly deleting anything I touch. Please leave me alone. Don't you have anything better to do? I don't need or appreciate your welcome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfwaviator (talk • contribs) 17:24, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Filing a complaint

I would like to file a complaint. What are the procedures for filing a complaint. Clearly there are conflicts of interest in regards to my edit of Airliners.net. I would like to appeal the deletion of my edit, and the existing edit that was connected to my edit that was deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dfwaviator (talk • contribs) 18:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Be Nice

Being nice

Throughout the entire process of NP patrol, it is important to remember not to bite the newbies. Far from being a monolithic horde of vandals, trolls, and spammers, the available evidence seems to indicate that newcomers write most of Wikipedia's content. If you see a new user or IP address contributing, {{welcome}} or {{welcome-anon}} them if you're so inclined, and include a pointer or two of feedback about how they can make their contributions even better. Most will gladly welcome the support. It is also important to assume good faith as much as possible, or, minimally to assume incompetence instead of malice. For example, remember not everyone is as computer-literate as you; some people will accidentally blank or damage pages when attempting to cut and paste material from Wikipedia. Others may not understand that, yes, their changes really are visible to the entire world.

You and your cohorts could try to be nice and ask me why I posted the information that I did, in private allowed me to give you background and supporting information (which I have) and then given me advice how to post the information correctly, instead of being nasty.

Dfwaviator (talk) 19:27, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Acceptance

I am very curious. Within 15 minutes of me signing up, and adding (what I feel is very valuable) information. You just jump in and delete it. As I read thru the terms and instructions throughout Wikipedia, it speaks of discussing information. You also deleted information that was already there and accused me of doing so. Your friend Whuwuzdat sent me a threatening message. I am very disappointed in the un-professionalism and lack of disregard. You could have offered advice or information on how to reword the information to make it fit the guidelines. Instead you chose to be an unfriendly person and just deleted it. You could have been nice.

You are an unfriendly self serving individual. If you want to be helpful, do so......You could respond to my messages instead of ignoring me.Dfwaviator (talk) 23:55, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

You have requested that I leave you alone, so I have not answered any of your messages on your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Restland Cemetery & Copyright

If you would look closely, I edited the material to make it just factual instead of advertising material. It is also fact. I can document all information posted.Dfwaviator (talk) 16:56, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Picking on Me

You must have some sort of axe to grind, or have no life. This is supposed to be open to the public. The information is factual that I posted regarding Restland Cemetery is factual. It can be found by searching the records of the Texas Funeral Service Commission. I am a licensed Mortician in the states of Arkansas and Texas and have a vast knowlege of many of the cemetery properties in both states, and would like to add that information. Stevie Ray Vaughn's aunt was recently buried at Restland, and he is Buried at Laurel Land in Dallas. That information is notable, and historic in value...I assume however that you will delete that as well. I fully intend to file a complaint against you with wiki as soon as I sift through the information and figure out how to do it. You seem to do this to many people. Dfwaviator (talk) 17:04, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Restland Cemetery

Say for example, in theory....I was an employee of Stewart Enterprises (Parent Company of Restland Cemetery) and I edited the information from the website (which I did, it is not verbatim, go back and look at it.) I changed key information that appeared to be aimed in a marketing fashion and changed it to more matter of fact language, It would fit the criteria. And in theory If I were an employee of said company, I would be able to verify the information being posted as fact. In theory.

Maybe, just maybe if you would have been civil, and took a chance to talk to me, you might have learned something. Instead you chose to act before asking. I will revert the information. Go read it. Dfwaviator (talk) 20:54, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Metairie Cemetery

This cemetery is also owned by Stewart Enterprises, is also on the National Register, and contains information from the Lakelawn Metairie website, yet you have not deleted itDfwaviator (talk) 21:06, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:28, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for reverting that vandalism to my user page (and for blocking the vandal). Appreciate it! Snappy (talk) 06:38, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

No problem. =) I had the block button loaded and ready to go with him as I figured he wasn't going to stop after the final warning. He snuck that second vandalism in just before I clicked the submit button. Sorry about that. On a side note, don't forget to substitute the user warning templates. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:43, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Urgh, sorry, I skipped over the instructions on your talk page. Bleah. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:55, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

User:BobSmith007

I think this is the same user as Plastics017‎ (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), check that users history as well. Nableezy (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:14, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Your speedy deletion of my contribution

I'm not happy with my contribution being deleted within seconds of publishing it. It took me time to compose and submit and if you had simply left me a message about why it should state that it is unique and should be allowed on wikipedia and given me some time I would have then added that content. I was going to do so when I saw you flagged my page but now the page is gone and it appears I have lost my work with no way to retrieve it. This is not the way to get the community involved in wikipedia. Has it gotten so big the little people (who built wikipedia) no longer matter? I am clearly not a vandalizer or someone who is out to do anything but improve the body of knowledge for everyone on the internet but I feel like I've been treated as a vandalizer. There is nothing else on the web like Ajarn Wiki and it is unique in several ways so if you would only allow me a chance to add that information I think you will agree that it does have a place on wikipedia. Can you reply to my message as quickly as you deleted my contribution? --Ajarn Eric (talk) 16:14, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:19, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Razorweiner

The user obviously has a very high degree of silliness and would probably be headed for a block anyway, but I'm not seeing the sockery thing. The user does seem to be the IP that was trying persistently to add homosexuality to Edward Low's attributes. However this seems more like a case of an anonymous user who finally got around to getting a username, which could be taken as a positive step out of the darkness. --Dynaflow babble 16:23, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Never mind; just found Aranesp (talk · contribs). Good block. --Dynaflow babble 16:41, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:56, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

mvrockman

So you told me to read the Advert rules and such regarding my addition to a few athletes pages about oneseason, the sports trading market influenced by the popularity of the players. I just want to clear this up with you to make sure I get it right. I believe the issue was I put the website name making it seem like i was advertising it, however if I link it to the sites wiki page then it is appropriate? If that is not correct please let me know what I would need to do to make it appropriate.

Thanks for the help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mvrockman (talk • contribs) 17:42, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:44, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Jayy Buddy

Please can you delete this again - must've crossed wires when putting tag on. Quantpole (talk) 23:47, 10 June 2009 (UTC) Already done. Quantpole (talk) 23:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

bob

it's in the OED - 2007. please check your facts before making random deletions. this is poor practice! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ewebiquitous (talk • contribs) 00:12, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:14, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Only warning

Why do I only get one warning wen everyvody else gets 4? SteveUrkelAwesome (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:49, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Zane Savage

Why do you keep taking down the Zane Savage article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Simulate you (talk • contribs) 04:16, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:19, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

User:DigOurGame/User:69.69.40.12

Thanks, I was just going to ask for help at WP:ANI. If you look at his anonymous edits, you'll see that he's been undoing quite a few of my other edits today. Do you think I'm safe in reverting those? One of them, at BossInGame, was his removing an AFD template. I don't want to run afoul of WP:3RR. Wyatt Riot (talk) 05:14, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

I see that he has been active under that IP for quite some time trying to put his game into the MMOG list. I didn't notice that. Stalking your past edits is not a good thing either. As for the removal of the AfD template, that would be vandalism, so reverting the removal would be exempt from 3RR. I reverted the removal. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Cheers! Wyatt Riot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

DigOurGame

I have unblocked DigOurGame (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). He has been counseled regarding Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. He is required to request renaming of his account before he does any editing. Fred Talk 01:09, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:55, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

I Love Money 3

Hi, as you were one of the admins to delete I Love Money 3, I thought you might want to have a look at I Love Money (season 3). I will inform the other admin as well. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 09:01, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Orangemike deleted the recreation. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 03:53, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Spamming Is Allowed?

I was checking vandalism on your page, noticed a snide remark someone left you and I checked that user's talk page for your response: Now instead of not. That's a rather humorous typo. ;) -WarthogDemon 05:34, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Re

You're welcome! Abce2|AccessDenied 18:37, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Phoenix23

Hi

I am looknig for more info on band Phoenix23. They are referred to on the 50 Dead Men Walking film page, having written 3 songs in the film sound track and I am keen to find out more about the band.

When I click on the link the Phoenix23 page just refers to not having a page.

Will they be having a page?

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.195.220.41 (talk) 11:20, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

If the band meets the notability guidelines for musical acts and somebody is willing to create an article for them, then the band will have an article. You are welcome to create an account and start the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:09, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

202.76.169.2

You blocked 202.76.169.2 yesterday for one year. However, there seems to be something wrong with the block, as the anon is still cheerfully vandalising! --Geronimo20 (talk) 05:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:51, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Tombstone's pages

I undeleted all of them per Tombstone's request using {{adminhelp}}; I did not remove the CSD tags, forgetting thay had been there. Did Tombstone ask for them to be redeleted? -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Cardmaker)} 07:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:27, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Www.wchfoundation.org.au

How did you delete this? The log points out that you deleted it earlier for G11. Me and jimfbleak ran into a problem deleting the article, he can probably explain further. If you feel compelled to respond on my talk page, don't bother with a new section; just edit the blanking section, it's the one regarding the problem. —LedgendGamer 07:13, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:33, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

The Wolfram Alpha Society

You deleted a reference to a new usage of the Wolfram Alpha search engine which has a facebook, meetup and web presence. I am the creator of the site and am currently in discussions with Wolfram Alpha's business development group. I believe it is a valid reference since it's concept is to take wolfram alpha's abilities and use it on a meta level. Think BING and YOUTUBE. Please advise what criteria you require to enable this post to be reinstated.

Please also confirm whether you have censored this post due to the competitive nature of such an idea with Wikipedia and fear over Wolfram Alpha becoming a "wikipedia killer." I personally think that such ideas are unfounded and if anything the wikipedia format would only be increased by such websites as mine being developed.

Thanks, Steve Necel Snecel (talk) 23:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Snecel (talk • contribs) 22:54, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 01:21, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

User:Gurwlsww

Still a vandal, can you help? SpaceFlight89 (talk) 16:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Phantom Lapboard

Hi

I am the current CEO if Phantom Entertainment and my posts to the "Phantom Lapboard" are getting deleted. Can you please advise what I need to do to update the info on our pages?

Thank You,

John Landino Phei.comeback (talk) 02:00, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Deleted....??

Why did you delete Daniel Berman? Is he not significant enough for you? Just because he doesn't mean anything to you doesn't mean he means nothing to everyone else. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 0yia (talk • contribs) 02:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 02:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

First Selectman

Really? How blind and dumb are you? It stated that he was running for first selectman of our town. Does wikipedia only think people running for more "important" offices are good enough to be included on its website? I don't see it as such a great source anyway... why not let even people running for the lowliest offices be considered important? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Concernedcook (talk • contribs) 13:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 15:58, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Could you close this?

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Dharok1337 User's only contributions are creating the RFA and answering the questions for it. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents 16:03, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Never mind. Abce2|Free LemonadeOnly 25 cents 16:04, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

RE

No problem.--WillC 21:07, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Efusjon deletion.

Good evening. I do not understand why the Efusjon page would be deemed not notable. It would seem that providing un-biased information for people to make a real informed decision would be useful against a potential scam.

Not only is it a REAL MLM, which admits to using the matrix compensation plan, I provided links to official pages by the company that verify the content of the Efusjon page I tried to post. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericba (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

help plz

why did you delete my post .. please help me —Preceding unsigned comment added by Trauboth (talk • contribs)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:50, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

please post it again the text..

but im writing about a real person.. proberly the best in the world.. ill add redrences and so on .. but my text is now GONE .. please put it in and give me 24 hours and i will have pictures, links, fotos and so on.(Trauboth (talk) 22:56, 26 June 2009 (UTC))(Trauboth (talk) 23:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC))

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:08, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

thanks for keeping the article..

just very new at this sorry for the inconveninc.

trauboth Trauboth (talk) 23:13, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

sorry for the problems.. i will correct it so it meets your guide lines. best regards Dennis Ingemann Decastro aka. Trauboth (talk) 23:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

just reading through the notes and it says im writing about my self .. wich im not. is there a like to writing bio about a player from my contry .. do you have a link to the rules that apply.. Dennis Ingemann Decastro Trauboth (talk) 23:23, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

wrote the whole story

wrote the hole story. with links and so on. D. Ingemann aka. Trauboth (talk) 01:19, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

can you move my article to main

i have finished the article but could you please move it into main. i simply cant get it to work best regards

D.Ingemann aka. (Trauboth (talk) 01:36, 27 June 2009 (UTC))

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:21, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Are You My Daddy?

User:Gogo-dada <- Someone appears to think you are. Should that be usernameblocked? -WarthogDemon 19:33, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:39, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

I'm kind of new (as you can tell), and I'm trying to teach myself how to use anti-vandal tools. I'll remember to use it in the future. :-) --Serveux (talk) 07:32, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:19, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Okay

I'll take your comment into account. Thanks.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 07:34, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Is there a fast way of substituting templates?--The Legendary Sky Attacker 08:58, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Topology - expansion material

Thanks, and well done working out where I meant to put it. How did you know, can you read minds? SpinningSpark 18:48, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:56, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

I know you already have a heap of these but;

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For going that extra mile when you didn't have to. Due diligence before deleting and then some. SpinningSpark 19:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Gary Carr (Actor)

Hey, if you don't mind could you have a look at this article? I'm not sure that it qualifies for speedy deletion, and a prod was removed by the author (who has an extreme COI and has no edits outside this vanity page). Should this now be taken to AfD? -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 18:49, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Alright, thanks. -T'Shael, Lord of the Vulcans 19:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Message from Bobmonkey98

Why did you delete my bob monkey enterprises page? it was not blatant advertising. Please tell me what to do to have it deemed ok by you and wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobmonkey98 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:43, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Redmond, Washington page

Why remove the information on council candidates? This is useful information. If it's not on Wikipedia, it will be nowhere as the city doesn't have a list of candidates. And, certainly, this sort of information is in many other places on Wikipedia. I agree that the fact that Kim Allen is running for re-election doesn't belong in the list of current council members (but not because it's COI -- I don't care who put it in). RoyLeban (talk) 06:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

You might want to look at List of election results by country. There are lots of election results and lots of election information on Wikipedia and the information in this article is a lot less than you can find elsewhere. If you find something that you think doesn't belong in a particular article and that thing has had multiple editors over a long period of time, I would suggest taking it to the article's talk page rather than assuming all those other editors are wrong. And don't let the obvious COI edits by one candidate (clearly a new editor on Wikipedia) sway you to thinking the whole section doesn't belong. RoyLeban (talk) 23:01, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Points noted. I did not do the revert, though I did do some post-revert cleanup. You might want to check out this article Seattle mayoral election, 2009. If that deserves an entire article, certainly Redmond deserves a section on the upcoming election, where half of the city council will be elected. I think your argument is better for removing/pruning the results of the previous election (and note that I and others already pruned it back from what it was during and immediately after the election). RoyLeban (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)