User talk:Monkey Bounce

Turkish gialli

I would definitely be interested in more info about them. Шизомби (talk) 13:03, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Queen of Swords

I was wondering why you deleted my two paragraphs on Queen of Swprds and the link to Jose Feliciano song. This is rare, the song was never released and a complete version in English is hard to find. Queen of Swords Titles has only the last verse. Maybe I should have put it as a new section ==Music== REVUpminster (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement. I don't know if you are in the UK but this show had its first broadcast here in August then only on a minor satellite channel. It has just finished its third run and I have become quite an expert especially after buying an official dvd(French) as opposed to the bootleg American. I included the bit in the plot summary about her running away to fight another day because she did. In only two episodes did she take on the whole town garrison. I did alter the statement that she was Tessa by day and the Queen by night to by day and night because most of the adventures took place in the day.REVUpminster (talk) 23:21, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the kind words

Apparently some internet superheros think they can do whatever they want to articles on Wikipedia. I always go back to the first revision before the vandalism started or else you end up undoing some and putting more back in (as you can see I did here and here!) But in the end everything worked out as soon as it was protected, as it usually does. It might pay to put articles that you see getting attacked like that on your watchlist just in case! The vanadalism had been up for almost half an hour before someone noticed. Happy editing! Matty (talk) 23:53, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Lazy-man sandwiches

I've removed your speedy tag from this article; please see WP:NONSENSE for what does and does-not fall into this category. I have instead PRODed it under WP:MADEUP. Ironholds (talk) 06:30, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

IPv6Gate / User_Talk:213.197.27.252

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#IPv6Gate and 'vote' for blocking both User_Talk:213.197.27.252 and User_Talk:94.75.219.73 permanently. See further text on the noticeboard. Jeroen (talk) 12:59, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

re User talk:Martin451#You wuz reported to AIV

You don't half make it difficult for us power crazed admins to swing the banhammer, what with your prompt explanations/apologies and everything... I think I should block you for that (but I suddenly am unable to find the bleck button!!!) LessHeard vanU (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

It happens to us all

Martin451 (talk) wishes you peace!

Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{subst:WikiPeace}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message.

Rollback

I have Bounce granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 13:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Confused

What do you mean page blanking i removed unsourced material and with material of no relevance to the topic i also added sourced material maybe you should actually read before you send out messages 86.158.237.159 (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2009 (UTC) The edit summary was for Wikireader41 a know islamophobic editor do you want proof ?. Anyways i added sourced material yet you removed it please explain and NO i removed a unsourced claim and one sourced claim which has no relevance to the article at hand its about kashmir to indias demands to USA so please stop accusing me of blanking let me repear i removed 1 unsourced claim and 1 sourced irrelevant one AND i added 2 sources and info about recent events cheers 86.158.237.159 (talk) 11:28, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] This is my reason for calling wikireader41 a pov pushing vandal take a peek into his attacks on pakistan and islam if you have time that is if not dont worry 86.158.237.159 (talk) 11:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

No problem sorry for being a bit over hyper about my comments and edit summary take care and keep up your good work on wikipedia :) 86.158.237.159 (talk) 11:48, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

86.158.237.159 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

This appears to be banned User Nangparbat. he is a banned POV pushing Vandal. please ignore him.

Nangparbat (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Re wrong Warning

Yes, I noticed my mistake, I am very sorry for these things, mistakes happen right, didn't think twice, your name was very similar to the vandal's. My apologies. Gsmgm (talk) 10:21, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Club Mahindra Holidays

Hi

Apologies for the "spam"; I'm writing to you and other editors because you have edited the Club Mahindra Holidays article recently.

Concern has been expressed that the article is too promotional and is about a non-notable subject. I do not necessarily agree with this, however I am concerned that unless these issues are addressed then the article may be deleted. I am therefore asking for your help in improving the article, and wish to make the following suggestions:

• The article should avoid being a promotional vehicle for Club Mahindra: the article should adhere to Wikipedia's policies of neutral point of view.
• The article should avoid being an attack on Club Mahindra: while some criticism is to be expected the article should not be an attack page.
• Positive and negative comments about Club Mahindra should be referenced by reliable sources such as major newspapers and business magazines.
• Controversial claims - either for or against Club Mahindra - should be discussed on the article's talk page.

Once again, apologies for disturbing you with this matter but I hope I can look forward to working with you on improving this article!

Cheers, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 10:12, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for replying. I tend to agree with you: notable enough, but subject to pro/anti editing. Hopefully many eyes will keep that in check. Thanks again, This flag once was red^propaganda_deeds 11:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello and thank you

For deleting those instigative comments that a certain user made on ScottOring's and my user pages. Ironic, I have not logged on to my Wikipedia account for quite some time and when I do it's shortly after BZ has returned out of the blue. Quietmartialartist (talk) 18:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Lake Forest Plaza

Are you familiar with the area? I lived there for 35 years. Yes, the inrease in section 8 housing brought a huge wave of crime into the area and every single (literally) person who was so moved via section eight was black. It might make you uncomfortable but if you want to understand what happened to the area, you should probably butt the hell out. Or do you have some personal experience that contradicts these facts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.114.34.128 (talk) 07:41, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

It's not worth fighting over unsourced material. Better to cut it out and start over with solid material and good sources.   Will Beback  talk  08:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

No worries :D and Thanks

It was abit wasnt it? Sorry about that, didnt realise, but thanks for the heads up there I appreciaite it.

NO problems at all :D sorry for the trouble caused. --Jamesootas (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the revert on my talk page while I was busy blocking that account. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:36, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

AIV report

Thanks for the AIV report on that IP vandal. You beat me to it, and it was my user page and contributions he was vandalising :) How'd you spot it, just out of interest? Orpheus (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

And help with the cleanup too... nice one. This particular user has a long history of being childish, by the way, under several different IPs (usually from the 86. range). Feel free to ping me if you notice him getting up to it again. Orpheus (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

I see you've been dragged into the whole thing now... sigh. Sockpuppet reports are more for the long-term abuse by registered users - in this case, you're better off making a post at WP:AN/I instead. See here for an example, which resulted in this. The fact that he's editing despite a block will guarantee a swift response. Orpheus (talk) 14:03, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Richard Carpenter (theologian)

Would you be so kind to review the article once again. I tried to wiki it so to speak. Thks! Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)