User talk:Wumpism

These are the Words of the Month:

Apr. 2009 - Wumparium, Wumpi, Wumpist, Wumpit

Previous Words of the Month

Nov. 2008 - Wump, Wumpy, Wumpier, Wumpified

Dec. 2008 - Wumpism, Wumpian, Wumpracle, Wumpable

Jan. 2009 - Wumpmanship, Wumpee, Wumper, Wumpill

Feb. 2009 - Wumpability, Wumpological, Wumpret, Wumpiwump

Mar. 2009 - Wumpamatical, Wumpreteer, Wumpician, Wumpimania

April 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Wikipedia:Bookshelf/A-Z/1. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Susan118 (talk) 22:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Wumpism

User:Wumpism, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wumpism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Wumpism during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:30, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: Wikipedia is not for things made up at school one day nor your webhosting service. Please do not remove the Miscellany for deletion tag on your user page. Doing so will not stop the deletion discussion. If you oppose the deletion, you may participate in the deletion discussion at the linked page by explaining your reasons that your user page should remain. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:13, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:Wumpism

A tag has been placed on User:Wumpism, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Many otters • One hammer • HELP)} 18:59, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]