User talk:FloridaArmy/Archive 77

Archive 70

←

Archive 75

Archive 76

Archive 77

Archive 78

Archive 79

Archive 80

Your submission at Articles for creation: Murder of Marsh Cook has been accepted

Murder of Marsh Cook, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:02, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Frank A. Burr

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank A. Burr, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Walter Kirkpatrick Brice

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Walter Kirkpatrick Brice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:47, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Belka Games

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Belka Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:40, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Henry Lafetra

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Henry Lafetra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Clifford Roscoe Moore Sr.

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clifford Roscoe Moore Sr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Solomon Golat

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Solomon Golat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mary Augusto

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mary Augusto, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capitol Hill High School (Oklahoma) has been accepted

Capitol Hill High School (Oklahoma), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scorpions13256 (talk) 00:24, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swayne College (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Swayne College and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Swayne College, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, FloridaArmy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 08:31, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rossonian Hotel has been accepted

Rossonian Hotel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Emory Cole has been accepted

Emory Cole, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 10:20, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ted Tunnell has been accepted

Ted Tunnell, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maurice Pledger

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maurice Pledger".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarboro High (February 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarboro High and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Tarboro High, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 09:53, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vontae Diggs has been accepted

Vontae Diggs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Empire State Library Network

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Empire State Library Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

Richard J. Hinton

I am working on him today and to avoid stepping on each others' toes, I'd papreciate it if you waited a day or two before making revisions to it. Thank you. deisenbe (talk) 11:50, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Of course. Sorry about disrupting your good efforts. FloridaArmy (talk) 11:53, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Gags and Gals

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gags and Gals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Soundies Distributing Corporation of America

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Soundies Distributing Corporation of America, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:O. S. B. Wall

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:O. S. B. Wall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:04, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frederick W. Wells has been accepted

Frederick W. Wells, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jack Frost (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mitchell Goggins

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mitchell Goggins, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hardy Brian

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hardy Brian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edgar George Brown has been accepted

Edgar George Brown, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Acebulf ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:40, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel J. Sharfstein

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel J. Sharfstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Sharfstein has been accepted

Daniel Sharfstein, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Joseph Smothers has been accepted

Joseph Smothers, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mitchell Goggins has been accepted

Mitchell Goggins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:20, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Cosgrove (South Carolina) has been accepted

James Cosgrove (South Carolina), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reuben Gaither has been accepted

Reuben Gaither, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Allison W. Hough has been accepted

Allison W. Hough, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 22:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:P. C. Fludd has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:P. C. Fludd. Thanks! Rusalkii (talk) 22:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zachariah Wines has been accepted

Zachariah Wines, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Can you do put in a little more work with your citations?

Can you try to use the various cite templates in the future? It's very tedious to come in behind people and try to clean up those citations.Evvekk (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

FloridaArmy, I appreciate the work you do but I have to agree with Evveek on this one. I wish to the drafts you submitted were cleaner. S0091 (talk) 00:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Plato Fludd has been accepted

Plato Fludd, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathaniel T. Spencer has been accepted

Nathaniel T. Spencer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Irvin G. Wylie

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Irvin G. Wylie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian Cumber (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lillian Cumber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lillian Cumber, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rusalkii (talk) 18:36, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: They Know Their Groceries (February 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devonian Wombat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:They Know Their Groceries and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:They Know Their Groceries, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:13, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louis J. Winston has been accepted

Louis J. Winston, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hardy Brian has been accepted

Hardy Brian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 21:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Unless something has changed...

Please remember the total tally you are allowed of simultaneous AFC submissions. I won't restate it here. Please also remember that I only leave these messages for you to seek to ensure your continued ability to edit. I value your contributions, even those that are declined. This shows your current AFC submissions Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Instead of posting this notice why not just move them to mainspace User:Timtrent? "Problem" solved. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Instead of snarking, please just understand the spirit of goodwill in which this message was left. I'm perfectly happy not to be on your side of that will assist. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 21:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Who's snarking? You posted a warning message, and I inquired why you don't do something to fix the problem. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

A great deal of your pending AFC submissions simply aren't ready for the mainspace, moving them doesn't "fix" the problem so much as just change it. In particular, you need to work your use of the citation templates, like in this edit. It would also help to develop your articles more, instead of writing just a few sentences like this.Evvekk (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

You cite a draft I started that I haven't submitted as a problem? I also noticed you removed citations from an article I was working on.

Wikipedia is a collaborative enterprise and it's not my responsibility to work single-handedly on any subject.

The problem is that notable subjects are excluded from Wikipedia. This is what needs fixing. Not attacking someone working on the problem. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Please don't think I'm trying to attack. Like Timtrent says, you do a lot of great work in an underrepresented area. I've never once said any of your stubs are non-notable. I'm just saying that a reason a lot of your pending stuff isn't in mainspace is because it still needs work.

Valid point on me pointing out a draft, so here's another example. In Hardy Brian, you cited Sipress, Joel (2008). "A Narrowing of Vision: Hardy L. Brian and the Fate of Louisiana Populism". The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. 7 (1): 43–67. doi:10.1017/S1537781400001729. JSTOR 25144508. S2CID 163650688 – via JSTOR. It's 26 pages on the man, his life, his work, and the impact he had on his community. The only thing you pulled from it was a single sentence that said he existed. And that's fine, it's just not well developed.

RE: removing citations: If you're talking about edits like this, it's because if all you're saying is the work exists, then the existence of the thing is citation enough. Here's another example of the same. I'm having a hard time finding any other kind situation where I simply removed references vice changed the cite template. If you find a situation, or have any issues with my edits, just let me know and we can talk it over.Evvekk (talk) 23:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

And I thought I sent you a friendly message. Ah well. The story of the written word versus the spoken word. I'm not going to have a fight with you over this. I care, but not enough to get bent out of shape over it. You create a very useful quantity of decent stubs, some bigger than that. You major on an under-represented area, and your work is a net benefit. Good. I reckon the reason you survive without further formal censure is that others hold the same view as I do about your work. Good. But please stop pushing the envelope. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 22:25, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Leo D. Sullivan

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leo D. Sullivan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lillian Cumber has been accepted

Lillian Cumber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Kansas City Sun has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kansas City Sun. Thanks! Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:34, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Don't give up. You are appreciated! Unbroken Chain (talk) 02:54, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you User:Unbroken Chain. The answer to your question is 1) to acknowledge there is a problem and 2) help and support editors working to fix the problem. This is what you and many others have done and I appreciate it. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Merton L. Dillon

I pulled Merton L. Dillon out of the AfC process and into mainspace, and have done a little work on it. Thank you. Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Great! Thank you. Please let me know if I can ever be of assistance User: Djm-leighpark. Thanks again. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:45, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft comments

Hey, is there a better way for you to leave comments like "Notable as a prize winning author and leading legal scholar." and "Daniel Sharfstein should link here" (on Draft:Daniel J. Sharfstein) than plain text at the top of the draft? It's another thing that the reviewer needs to remember to clean up after accepting, which isn't a huge deal but does get a little annoying sometimes. One option might be to use the AfC comment template, which is cleaned up automatically by the script. Rusalkii (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

I don't know of a better way. I think the discussion should be together. I don't think it's helpful that it's not threaded like other discussions and I don't think complocating it with templates is worthwhile. I am happy to remove the comments once an entry is approved and don't find it difficult. As far as maintenance instructions those normally go at the top and I am happy to do the redirects. They are important and I don't leave them sitting uselessly on articles as is commonly done with so many of our maintenance templates. Thabks so much for your help and reviews! I am happy to do whatI can to make ot easier but I am stuck with using AfC so I have to adapt as best I can. Cheers. FloridaArmy (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

FA and {[ping|Rusalkii}} I agree there should be a better way. Rusalkii, do you mind maybe posting something this on the AfC talkpage? There could be a template or something that none of us know about (or something). Whatever the solution AfC reviewers need to be aware so we are on the same page. FA, in the longer term, lets work towards getting away from you having to submit through AfC. I know its frustrating to say the least but in order for that to happen I think you need a strong record of "approval ready" drafts. Many are but still some are not and some of the issues are simple things like citation formatting (as noted below). What do you think about about seeing if some stats could be gathered like the percentage of your drafts that are accepted? Do you think that would help? S0091 (talk) 01:45, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Messed up the ping @Rusalkii:. S0091 (talk) 01:46, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

@S0091 I've posted to the talk page, let's see if anything comes out of it. Rusalkii (talk) 00:43, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Cornelius Asbury has been accepted

John Cornelius Asbury, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Pioneer and News

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pioneer and News, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Schexnayder House

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schexnayder House, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Colored Citizen has been accepted

The Colored Citizen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Evvekk (talk) 17:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pope B. Billups has been accepted

Pope B. Billups, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Evvekk (talk) 19:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Louisiana Historical Association

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Louisiana Historical Association, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Source needed for Gouldtown, New Jersey

Can you add the source needed for this edit to the article for Gouldtown, New Jersey? Alansohn (talk) 19:27, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Here User:Alansohn. It's an annual yearbook and seems to be in at least several of them. I haven't looked in the earliest editiom and don't know if it's in all of them. The study noted also looks interesting. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:47, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add that to the article, as required. Thanks! Alansohn (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

I added the study as a further reading. FloridaArmy (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Your edit to Draft:Trinity School (Athens, Alabama) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

I can't see what was removed but I do recall accidentally pasting a short section of text. I tried to fix it and modify it sufficiently to meet muster. And it was cited. It also appears to me that the original source of the text are AMA documents from the late 19th and early 20th century. But I will try to be more careful. I don't think Amistad is the copyright holder if there is any becaus the source are AMA records as per the note at the bottom of the Amostad page. Are they violating a copyright? http://amistadresearchcenter.tulane.edu/archon/?p=collections/controlcard&id=28 And the AMA records are in turn from the school itself which no longer exists as that instution which ceased operations as a lriavte entity some 70+ years ago. FloridaArmy (talk) 23:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Samuel Armstead

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samuel Armstead, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gillespie-Selden Historic District has been accepted

Gillespie-Selden Historic District, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 15:21, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lubliner and Trinz

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lubliner and Trinz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:04, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godson Orélus (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Godson Orélus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Godson Orélus, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 02:40, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Four years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Merline Pitre

Hello, FloridaArmy. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Merline Pitre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paula Barra has been accepted

Paula Barra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herman Dreer has been accepted

Herman Dreer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 14:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James A. Cobb has been accepted

James A. Cobb, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 21:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James G. Leyburn (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:James G. Leyburn and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:James G. Leyburn, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 00:49, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Leo D. Sullivan

Hi! Stumbled on your draft when I was looking up something on Floyd Norman. Sullivan is clearly notable so I've expanded and mainspaced. Thanks for the links within, sources I hadn't found in my search. Star Mississippi 02:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks User:Star Mississippi! His work and efforts are interesting and noteworthy. I was worried the subject would be lost to the Wikipedia meat grinder as I haven't had good luck with subjects of African American history and leadership. I am glad you were able to help. Thanks again. Please let me know if I can ever be of any assistance. The Soul Train locomotive animation is a classic. FloridaArmy (talk) 00:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Calvin Ross

I have started Draft:Calvin Ross, and thought this might be in your realm of interest. Cheers! BD2412 T 17:58, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Interesting subject User:BD2412. I haven't had a lot of time recently to work on article subjects and continie to be under duress here but I will try to help as best I am able. Take care and thabks so much for all your good efforts!!! FloridaArmy (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Understood, and thank you for your efforts as well! BD2412 T 01:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:James G. Leyburn has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:James G. Leyburn. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mt. Olivet Baptist Church has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mt. Olivet Baptist Church. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:58, 2 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mt. Olivet Baptist Church (Harlem, New York) has been accepted

Mt. Olivet Baptist Church (Harlem, New York), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:21, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

User:FloridaArmy - If there are any more churches to be listed, you may edit the disambiguation page, or submit any drafts and ping me and I will look at them. Robert McClenon (talk) 07:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kangaroo Records

Hello, FloridaArmy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kangaroo Records".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Capital Hill Colored School has been accepted

Capital Hill Colored School, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Hitro talk 18:39, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Moved one into place; hope you like what I did

See Irvin G. Wyllie. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Looks great. Thanks User:Orangemike. FloridaArmy (talk) 19:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Legislators are one of my things

Legislators are kind of a specialty of mine, and I'm proud to say I've done several articles on African-American legislators (mostly freedmen) from my home state of Tennessee. Feel free to drop me a note if you're having trouble with articles. --Orange Mike | Talk 03:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Will do. Thanks very much for the kind offer of assistance. Is there a book on Temnessee's African American legislators of the Reconstruction era? Jim Crow? I recall working on a couple but not sure how many there were? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: James Ephraim McGirt has been accepted

James Ephraim McGirt, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:45, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Victor Rochon has been accepted

Victor Rochon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 17:34, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert R. Jackson has been accepted

Robert R. Jackson, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 22:14, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kansas City Sun has been accepted

Kansas City Sun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Star Mississippi 20:39, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

• ooh, glad to see this was one of yours I cleared from the queue. I think there's probably more sourcing available especially about what made Sun rise when Son faltered, but this is fine for mainspace. Star Mississippi 21:06, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Star Mississippi I always love to see entries expanded and often do so myself. We have to start somewhere. Thanks for your good works. Draft:Robert R. Jackson seems good to go? FloridaArmy (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

thanks for flagging that one. Let me see what I can do on it to be sure it will survive in mainspace, but I think you're right that it's mostly good to go.

Happy to help on any of your history focused ones, but if you have any museum/culture ones pending, especially feel free to ping on those. Star Mississippi 21:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

User:Star Mississippi I think Draft:Yamekraw is a fascinating subject and neither the locality, the song it inspired, or the movie the song inspired appear to be covered on Wikipedia. For reasons that baffle me since I'm always told to merge stuff this entry has been blocked for having the audacity to cover all three. Thanks for your interest and help. Please let me know if I can be useful in some way. FloridaArmy (talk) 21:48, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Booker T. Washington School (Montgomery, Alabama) where a teenager went before being executed in a sham trial after being accused of raping a white woman is certainly missing from our coverage. Another girl at the school who was inspired by her teachers and the injustice of her schoolmate's execution refused to give up her seat on a bus for a white woman and was jailed and convicted. Her appeals went to the Supreme Court with Fred Gray as her attorney and she won. But her case didn't rwceive the notoriety that Rosa Parks received when she did the same thing months later because she was a more attractive figure to media and advocates.

There's also Draft:Sterling High School (South Carolina) where Jesse Jackson and other notables went.

Most of schools that served African Americans closed in the wake of desegregation and remain omitted from Wikipedia.

C'est la vie? I did an entry on a school that won its league's state football championship 8 times. EIGHT but still can't get it accepted. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:00, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Mississippi specific work-in-progress subjects include:

• Draft:Eatonville, Mississippi
• Draft:George Washington (Mississippi)
• Draft:George White (Mississippi)
• Draft:Willis Davis (Mississippi)
• Draft:John H. Morgan (Mississippi)
• Draft:Robert Thompson (Mississippi politician)
• Draft:James S. Simmons (Mississippi)
• Draft:Sprint Mart
• Draft:David Sansing
• Draft:Bay Springs High School

Not museum of cultural venues per se.. FloridaArmy (talk) 22:21, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

• Thanks for the list above, and the background. Will see what I can do with these in the coming weeks. In the interim, Robert R. Jackson is done. There's more than can be added, especially from this article, but I ran short on time today. Would love to find more on his work with the Leland Giants. Talk about a well rounded man in terms of all of his work. Star Mississippi 22:18, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Franklin Durden has been accepted

Robert Franklin Durden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– robertsky (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saroja Sirisena (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Saroja Sirisena and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Saroja Sirisena, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)

• User:Whisperjanes could you please help with this one? FloridaArmy (talk) 19:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
  • Added some info! She's held so many positions at the UN and elsewhere, it's hard to include them all. Feel free to add any significant positions if it seems I've missed important ones.
    It may also be worth asking Women in Red if she seems to pass notability or not? I think it seems she does (even just from routine coverage of her appointments and duties), but I'm not used to writing about diplomats or politicians. - Whisperjanes (talk) 19:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Saroja Sirisena has been accepted

Saroja Sirisena, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 03:06, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Patriot War (Florida) has been accepted

Patriot War (Florida), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 11:59, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trinity School (Athens, Alabama) has been accepted

Trinity School (Athens, Alabama), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 21:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)