User talk:Fingerz/Archive 1
Recently you tagged an article I wrote about Michigan state rep. Vincent Gregory, saying "This article may not meet the general notability guideline. Please help to establish notability by adding reliable, secondary sources about the topic. If notability cannot be established, the article is likely to be merged or deleted." According to the guidlines, a member of a state legislature is considered "notable". Most of the information in the article was obtained through an email correspondence with the State Rep. and is not available online anywhere else. I hope that I have established notablility and the tag can be removed. Chflitwick (talk) 19:49, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Muhammad salallahho alayhi wasalam article
[edit]I don't think it was vandalism, it was just a dictionary definition. I've redirected it to Peace be upon him (Islam), a few other versions of it already redirect there.[1]. —Snigbrook 22:30, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Black magic
[edit]There really wasn't much content, nor was the notability established. All the article said is that some woman invented it about three years ago by mixing Red Bull with something or other. Looked made-up to me, but if you feel it's notable, please feel free to recreate it if you wish. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:25, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Kupuaina
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Kupuaina, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kupuaina. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. andy (talk) 23:50, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
Speedy tagging
[edit]I am glad you are a reformed vandal who is now patrolling the new pages, but you might want to look at Wikipedia:Speedy as there are many more tags that can be used apart from db-vandalism. Using the right tag can ensure an admin knows what they are looking for before deleting it :) I Grave Rob (talk) 00:32, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]I see you're seeking adoption. I just took one on, but it wouldn't be a bad idea to group 2 together. Kill two birds with one stone, ya know? Let me know if you're interested. ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 03:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it would be great if you could adopt me. I'm eager to improve my contributions to wikipedia. FingersOnRoids (talk) 20:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- Sounds good. First off add {{Adoptee|wadester16}} to your userpage to replace the other one. Now, if you will, go here and answer some introductory questions for me. Thanks! ~ ωαdεstεr16«talkstalk» 21:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
WikiPorject Novels
[edit]I saw you attached a bio stub to the David Keck page I created. If you found that page because you are a fan of the author, or maybe you are just a fan of books in general. If so:
Wikipedia ads | file info – #87 |
Alan16 (talk) 00:49, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
CSD for Sowelu The Best 2002 - 20009
[edit]Hi, I wanted to let you know that I took off the CSD you put on Sowelu The Best 2002 - 20009. Unfortunately {{db-band}} only applies to the bands themselves and you cannot speedily delete an album under WP:A7, though if you want you could propose deletion through {{prod}} if you wish. Thanks, Valley2city‽ 02:52, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi there - see you added a prod to the article. No opinion yet on notability (though the article as it stands certainly doesn't establish it), but what makes you think it's a hoax? I didn't get that impression at all. Gonzonoir (talk) 21:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Me again :) Could you look at this diff and tell me whether I'm crazy, or whether the rewrite of the lead was just really, really small? *g* Gonzonoir (talk) 22:41, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hm, interesting question. I don't think copyvio technically does apply here, since copyright would relate to the literal, specific phrasing in the original. This is also rather more nicely written than the average Bablefish rambling. What's the page you think might be the source? Gonzonoir (talk) 22:50, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Micro
[edit]Hi there, thanks for joining the Wikiproject! Tim Vickers (talk) 01:10, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Algae categorisation
[edit]Hi, it could be easily done: just spell out exactly what the bot should do and I should be able to code it. I seem to recall WikiProject Plants disowning the algae, though - you should check with the wikiproject before the talk pages are tagged. Also note that all the new articles are categorised at a family level - I'm not sure what further categorisation is necessary. Martin (Smith609 – Talk) 18:35, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- Why the heck would a genus require a basionym to be redirected to? What? --KP Botany (talk) 06:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm not sure where the discussion is. However, I did remove the prods. I checked a couple of articles and they were valid genera, if no validated (not necessarily no valid) species. Algae are in flux, huge flux, so it's not that big of an issue to have a genus without a species. It should be. Still, I'd leave them, merge the basionym to the genus if possible. --KP Botany (talk) 06:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
ginger snaps
[edit]Don't delete my page please! It is for a newly formed band that is trying to goe publicity! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amicianthony (talk • contribs) 03:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks. Could I make a regular (not WP:BAND) article about the band then? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amicianthony (talk • contribs) 03:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Hi FoR: Following our discussion about this article I've copyedited the text. I think it no longer reads like a straight translation of the French UNESCO source. Could you give it a look over and see if it looks all right? Cheers. Gonzonoir (talk) 13:53, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
Algae Stubs
[edit]Hey, I noticed that you deleted the botany templates at the bottom of a bunch of algae stubs, and said in your edit summary it was because it wasn't within the scope of the plant wikiproject. Well, correct me if I'm wrong, but in the {{botany}} template, under plants, it lists algae. So did they change the scope of the wikiproject and forget to update the template? Regards, FingersOnRoids 00:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I removed {{botany}} from the algae stubs because it's one of those summary templates that's really only to be used to navigate between large topic areas, like those listed in the template. It's not meant to be on every individual species, genus, or family article. I removed {{WikiProject Plants}} from the talk page of a few algae stubs because the only algae WP:PLANTS is concerned with are the green algae, the Chlorophyta and Charophyta. I believe the stubs I said were not within our scope were red algae, which strictly speaking are not plants. Taxonomies and classifications differ, but green algae are usually considered to be in the same clade as land plants, though we frequently get misinformed high school kids changing the kingdom on articles like Volvox from Plantae to Protista (their textbooks are either outdated or chose to ignore new classification information; I recently taught an intro biology course at a community college and the book chosen -- not my choice -- still listed green algae as Protists and referred to all botanical divisions as phyla!). Hope that clears everything up. --Rkitko (talk) 02:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
- E.g., Brachysiraceae, which you recently created. It is not considered to be a plant. It's a family of diatoms and thus wouldn't warrant {{WikiProject Plants}} on its talk page. --Rkitko (talk) 22:51, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
- The best advice I can offer is to look at multiple sources. ITIS often uses outdated taxonomy. Diatoms haven't been included in Plantae for quite some time. Additionally, our article on plants has the proper circumscription - among algae, only the green algae (Chlorophyta and Charophyta) are plants. All others, including brown algae, red algae, diatoms, etc., are not plants. Does that help? --Rkitko (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Adoption
[edit]Hey, I was wondering if you're still interested in the adoption process. Your adoption page has sat stale for more than two weeks. If you're no longer interested, that's perfectly fine, no hard feelings. I just wanted to make sure. ~ ωαdεstεr16♣kiss mei'm Irish♣ 15:14, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
I need some help formating an image on Berching (Apartment and Tower). You can check on Berching's discussion page for what I need help with, but I basically need to know some basic formating information for Wikipedia. Thanks! Amicianthony (talk) 18:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Hello. I see you've added a "copyright infringement" tag to the Scott Yee biography page. May I ask why? There wasn't any infringement on the page, that I could see. CJCurrie (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think I see the problem here. I believe the other site in question was actually a Wiki-mirror page. CJCurrie (talk) 00:39, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Prod tag on National Register of Historic Places listings in Wythe County, Virginia
[edit]Hi Fingers ... I've removed the Prod tag you placed on National Register of Historic Places listings in Wythe County, Virginia and included a brief explanation in the edit summary. This list and hundreds of others like it have been generated by members of WP:NRHP. They are a very valuable resource for people interested in learning about historic properties and consolidate information in a way that is not available elsewhere. If you feel strongly that such lists do not belong on WP, please make your argument at WT:NRHP. --sanfranman59 (talk) 22:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Bubble tea!
[edit]-download | sign! has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
DYK for It's Just a Plant
[edit]Interesting article! Why didn't you take expansion credit? You certainly did enough work to earn it! More than one author can take full credit. Royalbroil 12:15, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering
[edit]--Dravecky (talk) 07:54, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cannibaloki 22:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Re: Laura Wins Game
[edit]Re your message: It was a bit of a stretch, I'll admit. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:58, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: I'm quite well aware that it's a bit bitey. But if you want, I'll restore it and you can AfD the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
- Re your message: Done. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Turkish people
[edit]But i put some references! You can look!
HG
[edit]Thanks for letting me know about my mistake! I'll be more careful in the future. CTJF83Talk 22:18, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
I did not edit the article with any intention to vandalize what was previously posted; conversely, I did edit the article with an intention--to make clearer the references to "chef," "cooking," and "fish." I did not post information, on [2], prior to what you refered to as my "... intentionally ... incorrect information...." I ask that you review, more thoroughly, my contribution to wikipedia; please consider reverting your action. I do hope that you do not mean to discourage editing on wikipedia? I do expect a prompt response. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.118.73 (talk) 22:50, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Redirect for 2009 predictions
[edit]Over at WP:Articles for creation/Redirects, it appears that while you accepted 2009 predictions as a redirect, you didn't actually create it. I've now done so, on the off chance you care. Best, Dori (Talk • Contribs) 03:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe James A.C
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 17:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- And just a heads-up that I also replied to your follow-up message, also at the above link. Thanks, Raven1977Talk to meMy edits 21:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Tommy Knight
[edit]I've undone your copyedit to Tommy Knight - he's British, as is Doctor Who Magazine, and they would have used UK spelling of paediatrician, not pediatrician. They both redirect to pediatrics anyway. See WP:ENGVAR. -- Arwel Parry (talk) 11:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Caridina gracilirostris
[edit]Gatoclass (talk) 15:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
G3
[edit]Good work in general, just thought I'd drop you a note re. Faraware, which I just came across. You do know that MH (probably) meant "Blatant and obvious misinformation" when he speedied under G3? Quite appropriate then, that it should be speedied, but I'm not too fussed either way. You are, of course, welcome to disagree! ;) - Jarry1250 (t, c) 16:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Mesangiospermae
[edit]Shubinator (talk) 21:55, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Third Opinion on Okashina Okashi
[edit]Hi! I think there was a little confusion over my request for a third opinion on Okashina Okashi - Strange Candy. The third party comment on the talk page was from editor assistance. Now I'd like a third opinion, since the dispute is still ongoing. I'm going to add back the request, so please let the person giving the third opinion remove it. Thanks! Ancemy (talk) 23:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
My PAGE
[edit]Stop editing MY PAGE-PeRmEtHiUs (talk) 12:17, 1 April 2009
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
DYK for Geoffrey Cornish
[edit]Shubinator (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Your ER
[edit]Hello, I had to archive your ER due to your inactivity and the inactivity on that page. Don't hesitate to open another in the future.--Truco 02:46, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hi FingersonRoids. I noticed that you are a member of the Guild of Copyeditors. I was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at my latest FAC, the Han Dynasty. The prose needs to be improved a bit, especially in regards to long sentences that need to be broken up into two or three. If you have any spare time to copyedit the article, it would be greatly appreciated. Cheers.--Pericles of AthensTalk 02:39, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
UAA
[edit]Hi - thanks for your comments at UAA. Just a quick note - there is no requirement for the alleged promotional username to be "blatant". That word is not mentioned in WP:U. There are two known facts about this user: 1) it is a name of a group/club, and 2) it was promoting it's own group on a page with the same name. It seems pretty clear that violates policy. Regards, JCutter (talk) 03:55, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Raw Signature
[edit]Also just a friendly note that your raw signature doesn't include a talk link. I don't know if they are required, but it seems pretty common to include them when customizing. Regards, JCutter (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Re:AfC
[edit]Alright, thanks for the heads up :) CanadianNine 01:41, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- Just out of curiosity, where can you find page protection articles? Ie. to find the protecting admin/reasons for original protection. Thanks, CanadianNine 01:47, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
: 27 April 2009
[edit]- Book reviews: Reviews of Lazy Virtues: Teaching Writing in the Age of Wikipedia
- News and notes: Usability study, Wiki Loves Art, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia Art dispute, and brief headlines
- WikiProject report: Interview on WikiProject Final Fantasy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot II (talk) at 04:12, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
KQJZ issues
[edit]I've overhauled the KQJZ article recently created at AfC because, as it stood, it was little more than a poorly-patched copy of the KIBG article with most of the infobox data and all of the history copied verbatim. This meant that even the most basic things were wrong, including the FCC database link since this is an AM radio station and the template was for FM station data. I've already left a note with the IP "author" of the first version of the article. - Dravecky (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
Not my name, just giving credit for who actually wrote it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Communism123 (talk • contribs) 22:25, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
She helped create and design the "Forreston History Book", a 400+ page book on Forreston, and yes, I do personally know her as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Communism123 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
Kolaid page
[edit]The page creation was vandalism, except the vandal misspelled "Koolaid" (Koolaid redirecting to Urine). As far as I know there is no word "kolaid" in any language, certainly not in English. The same editor is mostly a vandal-only account. I think it should be deleted. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 03:01, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm really not getting your point. Why should someone who is looking for Koolaid be redirected to urine? Koolaid has nothing to do with urine except in the mind of a vandal. As a secondary argument, I don't think the manufacturers of Koolaid would appreciate the redirect to urine. If I had had a beverage company that redirected to urine on Wikipedia, I would invite Wikiepedia to take the matter up with my libel attorney. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 03:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, my apologies. I misunderstood and thought you were reverting to a urine redirect. That's what I get for not reading carefully. Thanks. Ward3001 (talk) 03:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
: 11 May 2009
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimania 2010, usability project, link rot, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Quote hoax replicated in traditional media, and more
- Dispatches: WikiProject Birds reaches an FA milestone
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Michael Jackson
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 21:47, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
Copyedit request
[edit]Hi. I saw your name at the GOCE, and was wondering if you wouldn't mind taking a look at an article. Ralph Bakshi is currently listed over at FAC, and reviewers have suggested that the prose needs work. Could you help out? Thanks in advance. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 17:49, 15 May 2009 (UTC))
Your edits
[edit]After taking some time to look over your edits, I'm impressed. Keep up the good work. I especially like things like this (and the talks that came beforehand) and the cluefulness of this. Also, keep up the good work with the edit summaries. Your vandal fighting is good; keep up with the warnings. Also, this didn't hurt either. ;-) Again, you may want to consider an editor review. They are much better at reviewing now than they used to be. wadester16 | Talk→ 20:25, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Criteria for Proposed Task Force
[edit]How do we know what the criteria is for a proposed task force to become a new task force ? --InnocentsAbroad2 (talk) 00:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- I think the page you are looking for is at WP:TASKFORCE. Let me know if you need help with anything else! ƒingersonRoids 00:18, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Moth genera articles
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you're creating a good number of moth genera stubs. The problem is, they seem to be devoid of references. Do you plan on adding them? Or are you just leaving them as is? Regards, ƒingersonRoids 23:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Technically, since they're only stubs, they don't require references, although I do intend on adding them if/when I add more content. JJ (talk) 23:08, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I have to say I've never run across that policy. Can you point me to it? Thanks, ƒingersonRoids 23:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Don't know if there is one one way or the other- it's more of an "unwritten rule" IIRC. (not everything is written in a clear-cut policy...) However, feel free to prove me wrong if you find a link somewhere- I'll go back and add refs if need be. It just never seemed to be a problem in the past. JJ (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'd have to say the first sentence of WP:SOURCES pretty much says that there should be references. ƒingersonRoids 23:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm? Howso? Keep in mind these are one-sentence stubs meant as almost placeholders for articles to be written at some point, not entire articles in themselves... if I were to add any more content, then yes, I would add refs. With the current lack of anything that should referenced at the moment, though, I still don't see anything to convince me why I should reference the stubs thus far... hope I said that all correctly, it got a bit confusing. :) JJ (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it's not really a big deal, since there's no material in there that would be disputed and probably nothing that's factually wrong, unless you made a mistake on the whole article, which I doubt would happen. I guess I'm just saying that it would be nice if you put refs up to show that the genera actually exist, something like what is expected for articles on towns or cities.ƒingersonRoids 00:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Ah, OK, I see what you mean now. :) But yeah, I'll see if I can incorporate some additional info with refs when I create those in the future. JJ (talk) 00:26, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, it's not really a big deal, since there's no material in there that would be disputed and probably nothing that's factually wrong, unless you made a mistake on the whole article, which I doubt would happen. I guess I'm just saying that it would be nice if you put refs up to show that the genera actually exist, something like what is expected for articles on towns or cities.ƒingersonRoids 00:06, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
- Hmm? Howso? Keep in mind these are one-sentence stubs meant as almost placeholders for articles to be written at some point, not entire articles in themselves... if I were to add any more content, then yes, I would add refs. With the current lack of anything that should referenced at the moment, though, I still don't see anything to convince me why I should reference the stubs thus far... hope I said that all correctly, it got a bit confusing. :) JJ (talk) 23:57, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Well, I'd have to say the first sentence of WP:SOURCES pretty much says that there should be references. ƒingersonRoids 23:36, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Don't know if there is one one way or the other- it's more of an "unwritten rule" IIRC. (not everything is written in a clear-cut policy...) However, feel free to prove me wrong if you find a link somewhere- I'll go back and add refs if need be. It just never seemed to be a problem in the past. JJ (talk) 23:22, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I have to say I've never run across that policy. Can you point me to it? Thanks, ƒingersonRoids 23:15, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
: 18 May 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Writers needed
- Special report: WikiChemists and Chemical Abstracts announce collaboration
- Special report: Embassies sponsor article-writing contests in three languages
- News and notes: Wiki Loves Arts winners, Wikimania Conference Japan, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Arbitrator blogs, French government edits, brief headlines
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Opera
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 12:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Quote
[edit]I just wanted to say kudos for the quote on your user page, I enjoyed it. 04:32, 25 May 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sufitul (talk • contribs)
: 25 May 2009
[edit]- License update: Licensing vote results announced, resolution passed
- News and notes: New board member, flagged revisions, Eurovision interviews
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia: threat or menace?
- WikiProject report: WikiProject LGBT studies
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:32, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
UAA Clarification
[edit]I have posted a message for you over at UAA. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 01:08, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Linking categories
[edit]Regarding [3], you can make a link to a category by placing ':' in front. [[:Category:All articles lacking sources]]
produces Category:All articles lacking sources. PrimeHunter (talk) 22:03, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Haha, thank you, I was having quite a bit of trouble making the category link show up. Its a bit of irony I guess, that I was the one needing help editing Wikipedia.FingersOnRoids 22:19, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
Re: The Barnstar of Good Humor
[edit]Thank you very much! I was a bit worried that I should just be ignoring the silly little sock puppet, but I do have a hope that by engaging with it it may one day understand why it's constantly being reverted and blocked.
Cheers, This flag once was redpropagandadeeds 12:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Mighty Ducks pages
[edit]I just moved back those pages, upon your request. I believe the moves went properly, but let me know if I epic failed with something. ;-) Thanks, Jamie☆S93 22:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
: 1 June 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Browsing the archives
- Book review: Review of The Future of the Internet
- Scientology: End of Scientology arbitration brings blocks, media coverage
- News and notes: Picture of the Year, Wikipedia's first logo, Board elections, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Tamil Wikipedia, Internet Watch Foundation, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 22:22, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Colds7ream (talk) 16:01, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
: 15 June 2009
[edit]- Book review :Review of Cyberchiefs: Autonomy and Authority in Online Tribes
- News and notes: License update, Google Translate, GLAM conference, Paid editing
- Wikipedia in the news: In the Google News, London Review of Books, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Chemistry
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 11:26, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
Automatic processing of your editor review
[edit]This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 June 2009 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions. End of line. DustyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
: 22 June 2009
[edit]- Special report:Study of vandalism survival times
- News and notes: Wikizine, video editing, milestones
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia impacts town's reputation, assorted blogging
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Re: Admin coaching
[edit]Hmmm... I already have quite a few coachees, but I'd be able to do more informal admin coaching. Would that work? –Juliancolton | Talk 05:24, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Lenine
[edit]Thanks for catching that! My mistake, apologies for making extra effort necessary. Thanks for the super-speedy resolution too. 58.8.1.199 (talk) 06:55, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- No problem, Fingerz 06:57, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism hunting
[edit]- The link was for a high school reunion apprently. But since its been broken for two years and no one has fixed it and the page no longer exists and has been left in its present shape, Its hard to tell wether the website was spam or not. I think the contributer didnt intend on it being vandlaism as some of the other material that he added was valid but it still was embedded. Feel free to remove it, i think you had a good eye for tracing it back so far ;) Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Anybot's mess
[edit][4] You identified errors early on, but the bot owner did not correct them and the community ignored you. Good work for noticing what was wrong, and for continuing to try to correct it. I think the barnstar is supposed to be posted on your discussion page then moved to your user page, you probably know better than I.
I'm sorry you are dealing with a family emergency right now and may not see this. If people had listened to you, this whole mess could have been averted or at least minimized. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
The Original Barnstar | ||
The Original Barnstar is awarded to User:FingersOnRoids, who has first noticed serious problems with bot-generated algae articles and attempted to work with the bot owner and the community to fix the problems early on. Thank you for your contributions to an accurate and reliable encyclopedia. 69.226.103.13 (talk) 17:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC) |
- Thanks! I thought I was alone on trying to fix them, and I finally gave up, a while ago. It's nice to know other people noticed the errors and tried to fix the articles, though the sheer amount of articles with errors is astounding.FingersOnRoids 10:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
- 4077 of them were deleted today. Again, thanks for trying to be heard. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 06:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
: 29 June 2009
[edit]- News and notes: Jackson's death, new data center, more
- Wikipedia in the news: Google News Support, Wired editor plagiarizes Wikipedia, Rohde's kidnapping, Michael Jackson
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 01:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
New page User:Floropolou
[edit]Hello!
I was asking the question about creating a new page named CITY College, International Faculty of University of Sheffield. Many thanks for your help and quick answer.
I am sorry because I obviously misunderstood how article should look like.
As far as I understood now it should be more neutral with basic information.
Can I please rewrite the article and then send it to you to tell me if the content is appropriate?
I will start working on the text now and as soon and it is done, I will send it to you.
I hope that you can help me.
Many thanks so far and in advance.
Best regards,
Floropoulou. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Floropoulou (talk • contribs) 09:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, I think it'd be better if you submitted it at articles for creation. Doing so would give the article a much better chance of surviving, because you would get more input from different editors, while if you only sent it to me, you would only get my opinion. Regards, Fingerz 02:04, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Fedcap Rehabilitation Services
[edit]Hiya,
You asked me a couple of weeks ago why I'd declined an AFC for this; the version I reviewed here was a copyvio, and hence (on that page) the info has now been blanked.
Cheers, Chzz ► 20:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
DYK for Fedcap Rehabilitation Services
[edit]Wikiproject:Did you know 20:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Correcting redirect
[edit]Did you make this edit based on knowledge of the algae or were you merely correcting the bot's misplacement of the redirect? If you know something about the algal genera concerned and want the redirect to remain, please do nothing. However, if your correction was only of coding, please request the redirect be deleted by copying and pasting this line:
* <s>[[:Microglena]]: (1 edits, 1 major, +279) <span class="plainlinks">'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=272296379 (+279)]'''</span></s> '''delete'''
to:
User:Kurt Shaped Box/Anybot edits
Thanks for correcting bot additions, regardless of the reasoning behind this one. --69.226.103.13 (talk) 18:55, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
: 27 July 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Welcome to the build-your-own edition of the Signpost
- Board elections: Board of Trustees elections draw 18 candidates for 3 seats
- Wiki-Conference: Wikimedians and others gather for Wiki-Conference New York
- Wikipedia Academy: Volunteers lead Wikipedia Academy at National Institutes of Health
- News and notes: Things that happened in the Wikimedia world
- Wikipedia in the news: Assorted news coverage of Wikipedia
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Oregon
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by -- Tinu Cherian BOT - 09:08, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
Strawberry Swing
[edit]As an editor with a history of personal attacks[5] and of creating attack pages, I disagree that it wasn't appropriate. --JD554 (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Irbisgreif (talk) 17:57, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Re: Journal of Cheminformatics
[edit]In its current form, merging sort of makes sense, I guess... the merger did loose some information, such as ISSN and feed URL... I liked the split set up, as the info box information is available as RDF via the DBPedia project... about independent info about the journal, that is pretty scarce indeed... I'm not affiliated with the journal, and wrote a critical note about it in my blog [6]... would that qualify as independent? and the fact that I would add that to WP myself is no problem? EgonWillighagen (talk) 09:45, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
: 10 August 2009
[edit]- Special story: Tropenmuseum to host partnered exhibit with Wikimedia community
- News and notes: Tech news, strategic planning, BLP task force, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Shrinking community, GLAM-Wiki, and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 03:32, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
: 17 August 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Where should the Signpost go from here?
- Radio review: Review of Bigipedia radio series
- News and notes: Three million articles, Chen, Walsh and Klein win board election, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Reports of Wikipedia's imminent death greatly exaggerated, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 02:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Groovesharkcompanylogo.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Groovesharkcompanylogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
: 24 August 2009
[edit]- News and notes: $500,000 grant, Wikimania, Wikipedia Loves Art winners
- Wikipedia in the news: Health care coverage, 3 million articles, inkblots, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 04:14, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
: 31 August 2009
[edit]- Flagged protection and patrolled revisions: Misleading media storm over flagged revisions
- Flagged protection background: An extended look at how we got to flagged protection and patrolled revisions
- Wikimania: Report on Wikimania 2009
- News and notes: $2 million grant, new board members
- Wikipedia in the news: WikiTrust, Azerbaijan-Armenia edit wars
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 September 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Call for opinion pieces
- News and notes: Footnotes updated, WMF office and jobs, Strategic Planning and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wales everywhere, participation statistics, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Video games
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 September 2009
[edit]- Opinion essay: White Barbarian
- Localisation improvements: LocalisationUpdate has gone live
- Office hours: Sue Gardner answers questions from community
- News and notes: Vibber resigns, Staff office hours, Flagged Revs, new research and more
- Wikipedia in the news: Stunting of growth, Polanski protected and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Register of Historic Places
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 October 2009
[edit]- New talk pages: LiquidThreads in Beta
- Sockpuppet scandal: The Law affair
- News and notes: Article Incubator, Wikipedians take Manhattan, new features in testing, and much more
- Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia used by UN, strange AFDs, iPhone reality
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: New developments at the Military history WikiProject
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 October 2009
[edit]- From the editor: Perspectives from other projects
- Special story: Memorial and Collaboration
- Bing search: Bing launches Wikipedia search
- News and notes: New WMF hire, new stats, and more
- Wikipedia in the news: IOC sues over Creative Commons license, Wikipedia at Yale, and more
- Dispatches: Sounds
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Tropical cyclones
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 October 2009
[edit]- News and notes: WikiReader, Meetup in Pakistan, Audit committee elections, and more
- In the news: Sanger controversy reignited, Limbaugh libelled, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 October 2009
[edit]- Interview: Interview with John Blossom
- News and notes: New hires, German Wikipedian dies, new book tool, and more
- In the news: Editor profiled in Washington Post, Wikia magazines, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 November 2009
[edit]- Article contest: Durova wins 2009 WikiCup
- Conference report: WikiSym features research on Wikipedia
- Election report: 2009 ArbCom elections report
- Audit Subcommittee: Inaugural Audit Subcommittee elections underway
- Dispatches: Wikipedia remembers the Wall
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: Project banner meta-templates
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
CE request
[edit]Hi, I noticed you on the Guild of Copy Editors participant list, are you interested in providing copy-editing help on the "The Chinese Restaurant" article? Thanks.--Music26/11 15:24, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 November 2009
[edit]- New pages experiment: Wikipedians test the water at new page patrol
- German controversy: German Wikipedia under fire from inclusionists
- Multimedia usability: Multimedia usability meeting concludes in Paris
- Election report: Arbitration Committee candidate nominations open 10 November
- News and notes: Ant images, public outreach, and more
- In the news: Beefeater vandalism, interview, and more
- Sister projects: Meta-wiki interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 16 November 2009
[edit]- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser begins
- Bulgarian award: Bulgarian Wikipedia gets a prestigious award
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Several candidates standing
- In the news: German lawsuit, Jimbo interview and more
- Sister projects: Wiktionary interview
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Articles for Creation Article Review
[edit]Hello Fingerz. I saw your post at Wikipedia:Reward_board#Active_requests#Articles for Creation Article Review, so I thought I would try my hand at it. Think it was a good idea to work outside the box a little and bring attention to this worthy project. With that said, I provide my diffs here Kindly Calmer Waters 08:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 23 November 2009
[edit]- Uploading tool: New tool for photo scavenger hunts
- Election report: Arbitration Committee Election: Nominations closing November 24
- Fundraiser: "Wikipedia Forever" fundraiser continues
- News and notes: Government stubs, Suriname exhibit, milestones and more
- In the news: The Decline of Wikipedia, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
"No Size"
[edit]Hi! I just had to delete it again; it was yet another copyvio by the user who originally posted the article, one User:Stevensclan. The other deletions were because of a lack of content other than an opening sentennce, itself suspiciously "copyvio-ish." Sounds as if an article on this book would be most welcomed, though. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 30 November 2009
[edit]- Election report: ArbCom election begins December 1, using SecurePoll
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 December 2009
[edit]- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 December 2009
[edit]- Election report: Voting closes in the Arbitration Committee Elections
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 December 2009
[edit]- Election report: ArbCom election result announced
- News and notes: Fundraiser update, milestones and more
- In the news: Accusation of bias, misreported death, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 December 2009
[edit]- News and notes: Flagged revisions petitions, image donations, brief news
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 January 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Fundraiser ends, content contests, image donation, and more
- In the news: Financial Times, death rumors, Google maps and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
WikiProject Algae
[edit]WikiProject Algae was started as a meeting space on Wikipedia for improving the taxonomic representations of the groups of organisms called algae. Please join other editors at the talk page (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Algae) to discuss a higher level taxonomy for algae to be used on Wikipedia. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 19:24, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 11 January 2010
[edit]- From the editor: Call for writers
- 2009 in review: 2009 in Review
- Books: New Book namespace created
- News and notes: Wikimania 2011, Flaggedrevs, Global sysops and more
- Features and admins: Approved this week
The Wikipedia Signpost: 18 January 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Wikipedia's birthday and more
- In the news: Wikipedia on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Reward Board Notification
[edit]Just thought you should be reminded that your reward is nearing its expiration date with no responses to it, just in case you wish to expand the expiration date on it. --ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 02:30, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 25 January 2010
[edit]- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Wikipedia biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Wikipedia the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 February 2010
[edit]- From the editor: Writers wanted to cover strategy, public policy
- Strategic planning: The challenges of strategic planning in a volunteer community
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Dinosaurs
- Sister projects: Sister project roundup
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 February 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more
- In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more
- Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 February 2010
[edit]- News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 February 2010
[edit]- In the news: Macmillan's Wiki-textbooks and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Mammals
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
[edit]- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
[edit]- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
[edit]- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 29 March 2010
[edit]- Sister projects: A handful of happenings
- WikiProject report: The WikiProject Bulletin: news roundup and WikiProject Chicago feature
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 April 2010
[edit]- News and notes: New board member, rights elections, April 1st activities, videos
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Baseball and news roundup
- Features and admins: This week in approvals
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 April 2010
[edit]- Sanger allegations: Larry Sanger accuses Wikimedia of hosting illegal images
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Motorcycling
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 April 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Berlin WikiConference, Brooklyn Museum & Google.org collaborations, review backlog removed, 1 billion edits
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Environment
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 April 2010
[edit]- From the team: Introducing Signpost Sidebars
- Museums conference: Wikimedians meet with museum leaders
- News and notes: Wikimedia announcements, Wikipedia advertising, and more!
- In the news: Making sausage, Jimmy Wales on TV, and more!
- Sister projects: Milestones, Openings, and Wikinews contest
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Gastropods
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 3 May 2010
[edit]- Book review: Review of The World and Wikipedia
- News and notes: iPhone app update, Vector rollout for May 13, brief news
- In the news: Government promotes Tamil Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U.S. Roads
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 10 May 2010
[edit]- From the editor: Reviewers and reporters wanted
- Commons deletions: Porn madness
- Wikipedia books launched: Wikipedia books launched worldwide
- News and notes: Public Policy and Books for All
- In the news: Commons pornography purge, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Birds
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 17 May 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Backstage at the British Museum
- In the news: In the news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Essays
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 24 May 2010
[edit]- News and notes: New puzzle globe, feature for admins, Israel's "Wikipedia Bill", unsourced bios declining
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Saints
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 31 May 2010
[edit]- Photography: Making money with free photos
- News and notes: Wikimedians at Maker Faire, brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Zoo
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
The Wikipedia Signpost: 7 June 2010
[edit]- From the team: Changes to the Signpost
- News and notes: "Pending changes" trial, Chief hires, British Museum prizes, Interwiki debate, and more
- Free Travel-Shirts: "Free Travel-Shirts" signed by Jimmy Wales and others purchasable
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Comedy
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Grab some glory, and a barnstar
[edit]Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:20, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 14 June 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Pending changes goes live, first state-funded Wikipedia project concludes, brief news
- In the news: Hoaxes in France and at university, Wikipedia used in Indian court, Is Wikipedia a cult?, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 21 June 2010
[edit]- Sister projects: Picture of the Year results declared on Wikimedia Commons
- News and notes: Collaboration with the British Museum and in Serbia, Interaction with researchers, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject U2
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 28 June 2010
[edit]- Objectionable material: Board resolution on offensive content
- In the news: Wikipedia controlled by pedophiles, left-wing trolls, Islamofascists and Communist commandos?
- Public Policy Initiative: Introducing the Public Policy Initiative
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Ships
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
See: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nontheism.
Greetings, I see that you have chosen to conspicuously identify as a "Nontheistic Wikipedian" Me too! Currently there is a proposal to delete the article Nontheism or merge and redirect it to Atheism. Greg Bard (talk) 22:25, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 5 July 2010
[edit]- Wikimania preview: Gearing up for Wikimania in Gdańsk
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Children's Literature
- Features and admins: This week's highlights
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010
[edit]- UK COI edits: British politicians accused of WP cover-ups
- News and notes: Board changes, Wikimania, Public Policy Initiative
- Discussion report: Article ownership, WikiProjects vs. Manual of Style, Unverifiable village
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Apple Inc.
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Politician defends editing own article, Google translation, Row about a small Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Up close with WikiProject Animals
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom to appoint CU/OS positions after dumping election results
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010
[edit]- News and notes: New interwiki project improves biographies, and other news
- In the news: Wikipedia leads in customer satisfaction, Google Translate and India, Citizendium transition, Jimbo's media accolade
- WikiProject report: These Are the Voyages of WikiProject Star Trek
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Discussion report: Controversial e-mail proposal, Invalid AfD
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 2 August 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Canadian political edits, Swedish royal wedding, Italian "right of reply" bill, Chapter reports
- In the news: Gardner and Sanger on why people edit Wikipedia, Fancy and frugal reading devices, Medical article assessed
- WikiProject report: Always Expanding: WikiProject Images and Media
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
The Wikipedia Signpost: 9 August 2010
[edit]- News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee
- In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more
- Sister projects: Strategic Planning update
- WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 16 August 2010
[edit]- WikiProject report: A Pit Stop with WikiProject NASCAR
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: ArbCom releases names of CU/OS applicants after delay
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 23 August 2010
[edit]
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Cryptozoology
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision of climate change case posted
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 August 2010
[edit]- In the news: Agatha Christie spoiled, Wales on Wikileaks, University students improve Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: Studying WikiProject Universities
- Features and admins: Featured article milestone: 3,000
- Arbitration report: What does the Race and intelligence case tell us?
Paramathasara
[edit]Hey! I noticed you removed my speedy deletion. You said "There's context there". Yeah, that's true, but there's not enough, nor is it real. (I looked it up, I got nothing that has to do with that.) So are you okay that I go ahead and add it back? Thanks for helping! :) Endofskull (talk) 22:06, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- One last thing. I'm about to archive my talk page, because it's getting kind of long. So don't think I'm just ignoring you. My reply was "Oh, I understand now. I never knew that. Alright, thanks for the notification!" Again, thanks so much for notifying me on that! Endofskull (talk) 22:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
- It doesn't have enough context? I believe that the first few words in the article,"Paramarthasara" is a sanskrit word", make the subject of the article very clear. Regardless of whether the definition is correct or not, or whether the word even exists, the article doesn't fit under A1. However, feel free to PROD it if you like for not having correct information, or adding the correct information yourself. I don't believe that the article fits under any other CSD. Fingerz 22:19, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Holly wain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non notable model, fails WP-BIO
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paste Let’s have a chat. 17:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 September 2010
[edit]- Book review: Cognitive Surplus, by Clay Shirky
- WikiProject report: Putting articles in their place: the Uncategorized Task Force
- Features and admins: Bumper crop of admins; Obama featured portal marks our 150th
- Arbitration report: Interim desysopping, CU/OS appointments, and more
- Technology report: Development transparency, resource loading, GSoC: extension management
The Signpost: 13 September 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Page-edit stats, French National Library partnership, Mass page blanking, Jimbo on Pending changes
- Public Policy Initiative: Experiments with article assessment
- Sister projects: Biography bloopers – update on the Death Anomalies collaboration
- WikiProject report: Getting the picture – an interview with the Graphic lab
- Features and admins: "Magnificent" warthog not so cute, says featured picture judge
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 September 2010
[edit]- From the editor: New ways to read and share the Signpost
- News and notes: Dutch National Archives donation, French photo raid, brief notes
- In the news: Rush Limbaugh falls for Wikipedia hoax, Public Policy Initiative, Nature cites Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: All Aboard WikiProject Trains
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Dispatches: Tools, part 2: Internal links and page histories
- Arbitration report: Discretionary sanctions clarification and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
See agonist. Sure is weird to see a common-language word like "antagonist" with its negation prefix removed. DMacks (talk) 03:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 September 2010
[edit]- News and notes: French million, controversial content, Citizendium charter, Pending changes, and more
- WikiProject report: Designing WikiProject Architecture
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: EEML amendment requests & more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 4 October 2010
[edit]- WikiProject report: Hot topics with WikiProject Volcanoes
- Features and admins: Milestone: 2,500th featured picture
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Code reviewers, October Engineering update, brief news
The Signpost: 11 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Board resolutions, fundraiser challenge, traffic report, ten thousand good articles, and more
- In the news: Free culture conference, "The Register" retracts accusations, students blog about Wikipedia, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Smithsonian Institution
- Features and admins: Big week for ships and music
- Dispatches: Tools, part 3: Style tools and wikEd
- Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 18 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedia fundraiser event, Frankfurt book fair, news in brief
- WikiProject report: Show Me the Money: WikiProject Numismatics
- Features and admins: A week for marine creatures
- Dispatches: Common issues seen in Peer review
- Arbitration report: Climate change case closes after 4 months
- Technology report: Video subtitling tool, staff vs. volunteer developers, brief news
The Signpost: 25 October 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Mike Godwin leaves the Foundation, ArbCom election announced
- In the news: Good faith vs. bad faith, climate change, court citations, weirdest medieval fact, brief news
- WikiProject report: Nightmare on Wiki Street: WikiProject Horror
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- ArbCom interview: So what is being an arbitrator actually like?
- Arbitration report: Case closes within 1 month
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 1 November 2010
[edit]- In the news: Airplane construction with Wikipedia, lessons from the strategy project, logic over rhetoric
- WikiProject report: Scoring with WikiProject Ice Hockey
- Features and admins: Good-lookin' slugs and snails
- Arbitration report: Arb resignation during plagiarism discussion; election RfC closing in 2 days
- Technology report: Foundation office switches to closed source, secure browsing, brief news
The Signpost: 8 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Second Wikipedian in Residence, {{citation needed}} for sanity
- WikiProject report: WikiProject California
- Features and admins: No, not science fiction—real science
- Election report: The countdown begins
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Date delinking sanctions reduced for one party; History ban extended
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 15 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Fundraisers start for Wikipedia and Citizendium; controversial content and leadership
- WikiProject report: Sizzling: WikiProject Bacon
- Features and admins: Of lakes and mountains
- Dispatches: A guide to the Good Article Review Process
- Arbitration report: No cases this week; Amendments filed on Climate Change and Date Delinking; Motion passed on EEML
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 22 November 2010
[edit]- News and notes: No further Bundesarchiv image donations; Dutch and German awards; anniversary preparations
- Book review: The Myth of the Britannica, by Harvey Einbinder
- WikiProject report: WikiProject College Football
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Candidates still stepping forward
- Arbitration report: Brews ohare site-banned; climate change topic-ban broadened
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 29 November 2010
[edit]- In the news: Fundraising banners continue to provoke; plagiarism charges against congressional climate change report
- WikiProject report: Celebrate WikiProject Holidays
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: Voting in full swing
- Arbitration report: New case: Longevity; Biophys topic ban likely to stay in place
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
[edit]- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
[edit]- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
[edit]- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
[edit]- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 3 January 2011
[edit]- 2010 in review: Review of the year
- In the news: Fundraising success media coverage; brief news
- WikiProject report: Where are they now? Redux
- Features and admins: Featured sound choice of the year
- Arbitration report: Motion proposed in W/B – Judea and Samaria case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 10 January 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Anniversary preparations, new Community fellow, brief news
- In the news: Anniversary coverage begins; Wikipedia as new layer of information authority; inclusionist project
- WikiProject report: Her Majesty's Waterways
- Features and admins: Featured topic of the year
- Arbitration report: World War II case comes to a close; ban appeal, motions, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 17 January 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Talking wicket with WikiProject Cricket
- Features and admins: First featured picture from the legally disputed NPG images; two Chicago icons
- Arbitration report: New case: Shakespeare authorship question; lack of recent input in Longevity case
- Technology report: January Engineering Update; Dutch Hack-a-ton; brief news
The Signpost: 24 January 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Wikimedia fellow working on cultural collaborations; video animation about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Life Inside the Beltway
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: 23 editors submit evidence in 'Shakespeare' case, Longevity case awaits proposed decision, and more
- Technology report: File licensing metadata; Multimedia Usability project; brief news
The Signpost: 31 January 2011
[edit]- The Science Hall of Fame: Building a pantheon of scientists from Wikipedia and Google Books
- WikiProject report: WikiWarriors
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Evidence in Shakespeare case moves to a close; Longevity case awaits proposed decision; AUSC RfC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 7 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: New General Counsel hired; reuse of Google Art Project debated; GLAM newsletter started; news in brief
- WikiProject report: Stargazing aboard WikiProject Spaceflight
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Open cases: Shakespeare authorship – Longevity; Motions on Date delinking, Eastern European mailing list
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation report; gender statistics; DMCA takedowns; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia wrongly blamed for Super Bowl gaffe; "digital natives" naive about Wikipedia; brief news
- WikiProject report: Articles for Creation
- Features and admins: RFAs and active admins—concerns expressed over the continuing drought
- Arbitration report: Proposed decisions in Shakespeare and Longevity; two new cases; motions passed, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 21 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Gender gap and sexual images; India consultant; brief news
- In the news: Egyptian revolution and Wikimania 2008; Jimmy Wales' move to the UK, Africa and systemic bias; brief news
- WikiProject report: More than numbers: WikiProject Mathematics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Longevity and Shakespeare cases close; what do these decisions tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 28 February 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Newbies vs. patrollers; Indian statistics; brief news
- Arbitration statistics: Arbitration Committee hearing fewer cases; longer decision times
- WikiProject report: In Tune with WikiProject Classical Music
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC applications open; interim desysopping; two pending cases
- Technology report: HTML5 adopted but soon reverted; brief news
The Signpost: 7 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation looking for "storyteller" and research fellows; new GLAM newsletter; brief news
- Deletion controversy: Deletion of article about website angers gaming community
- WikiProject report: Talking with WikiProject Feminism
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case opened after interim desysop last week; three pending cases
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
The Signpost: 21 March 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Medicpedia — WikiProject Medicine
- Features and admins: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: One closed case, one suspended case, and two other cases
- Technology report: What is: localisation?; the proposed "personal image filter" explained; and more in brief
The Signpost: 28 March 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news
- In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news
- WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify
- Features and admins: Featured list milestone
- Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 4 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: 1 April activities; RIAA takedown notice; brief news
- Editor retention: Fighting the decline by restricting article creation?
- WikiProject report: Out of this world — WikiProject Solar System
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments, new case, proposed decision for Coanda case, and motion regarding CU/OS
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 11 April 2011
[edit]- Recent research: Research literature surveys; drug reliability; editor roles; BLPs; Muhammad debate analyzed
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Japan
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases closed – what does the Coanda decision tell us?
- Technology report: The Toolserver explained; brief news
The Signpost: 18 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news
- In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news
- WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us?
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 25 April 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Survey of French Wikipedians; first Wikipedian-in-Residence at Smithsonian; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Somerset
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Request to amend prior case; further voting in AEsh case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 2 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Picture of the Year voting begins; Internet culture covered in Sweden and consulted in Russia; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Physics of a WikiProject: WikiProject Physics
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two new cases open – including Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Call for RTL developers, varied sign-up pages and news in brief
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]
The Guild of Copy Editors – May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive The Guild of Copy Editors invite you to participate in the May 2011 Backlog Elimination Drive, a month-long effort to reduce the backlog of articles that require copy-editing. The drive began on May 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on May 31 at 23:59 (UTC). The goals of this backlog elimination drive are to eliminate as many articles as possible from the 2009 backlog and to reduce the overall backlog by 15%. ! NEW ! In an effort to encourage the final elimination of all 2009 articles, we will be tracking them on the leaderboard for this drive. Awards and barnstars We look forward to meeting you on the drive! Your GOCE coordinators: SMasters, Diannaa, Tea with toast, Chaosdruid, and Torchiest |
You are receiving a copy of this newsletter as you are a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, or have participated in one of our drives. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add you name here. Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:21, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
The Signpost: 9 May 2011
[edit]- In the news: Billionaire trying to sue Wikipedians; "Critical Point of View" book published; World Bank contest; brief news
- WikiProject report: Game Night at WikiProject Board and Table Games
- Features and admins: Featured articles bounce back
- Arbitration report: AEsh case comes to a close - what does the decision tell us?
The Signpost: 16 May 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: Back to Life: Reviving WikiProjects
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motions - hyphens and dashes dispute
- Technology report: Berlin Hackathon; April Engineering Report; brief news
The Signpost: 23 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: GLAM workshop; legal policies; brief news
- In the news: Death of the expert?; superinjunctions saga continues; World Heritage status petitioned and debated; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Formula One
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Injunction – preliminary protection levels for BLP articles when removing PC
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 30 May 2011
[edit]- News and notes: ArbCom referendum goes live; US National Archives residency; financial planning; brief news
- In the news: Collaboration with academia; world heritage; xkcd; eG8 summit; ISP subpoena; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Royal Railway
- Featured content: Whipping fantasies, American–British naval rivalry, and a medieval mix of purity and eroticism
- Arbitration report: Update – injunction from last week has expired
- Technology report: Wikimedia down for an hour; What is: Wikipedia Offline?
The Signpost: 6 June 2011
[edit]- Board elections: Time to vote
- News and notes: Board resolution on controversial content; WMF Summer of Research; indigenous workshop; brief news
- Recent research: Various metrics of quality and trust; leadership; nerd stereotypes
- WikiProject report: Make your own book with Wikiproject Wikipedia-Books
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Two cases pending resolution; temporary desysop; dashes/hyphens update
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 13 June 2011
[edit]- News and notes: Wikipedians 90% male and largely altruist; 800 public policy students add 8.8 million bytes; brief news
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Aircraft
- Featured content: Featured lists hit the main page
- Arbitration report: More workshop proposals in Tree shaping case; further votes in PD of other case
- Technology report: 1.18 extension bundling; mobile testers needed; brief news
The Signpost: 20 June 2011
[edit]- News and notes: WMF Board election results; Indian campus ambassadors gear up; Wikimedia UK plans; Malayalam Wikisource CD; brief news
- WikiProject report: The Elemental WikiProject
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: One case comes to a close; initiator of a new case blocked as sockpuppet
The Signpost: 27 June 2011
[edit]- WikiProject report: The Continuous Convention: WikiProject Comics
- Featured content: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision for Tree shaping case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their September 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy editing backlog. The drive will begin on September 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and will end on September 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles in the backlog, as we want to copy edit as many of those as possible. Please consider copy editing an article that was tagged in 2010. Barnstars will be given to anyone who edits more than 4,000 words, with special awards for the top 5 in the categories "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". See you at the drive! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
GOCE drive newsletter
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their November 2011 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on November 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on November 30 at 23:59 (UTC). We will be tracking the number of 2010 articles (and specifically will be targeting the oldest three months), as we want to copy edit as many of these as possible. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Diannaa, Chaosdruid, The Utahraptor, Slon02, and SMasters. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:05, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
GOCE newsletter
[edit]Greetings from the Guild of Copy Editors
Elections are currently underway for our third tranche of Guild coordinators. The voting period will run for 14 days: 00:01 UTC, 16 December – 23:59 UTC, 31 December. All GOCE members, as well as past participants of any of the Guild's Backlog elimination drives, are eligible to vote. There are five candidates vying for four positions. Your vote really matters! Cast your vote today. |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:40, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
[edit]Guild of Copy Editors 2011 Year-End Report
We have reached the end of the year, and what a year it has been! The Guild of Copy Editors was full of activity, and we achieved numerous important milestones in 2011. Read all about these in the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report.
Get your copy of the Guild's 2011 Year-End Report here
On behalf of the Guild, we take this opportunity to wish you Season's Greetings and Happy New Year. We look forward to your support in 2012! – Your 2011 Coordinators: Diannaa (lead), The Utahraptor, and Slon02 and SMasters (emeritus). |
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:16, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March copy edit drive
[edit]Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their March 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on March 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on March 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goal for the drive will be to eliminate the remaining 2010 articles from the queue. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 5 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", and "Number of articles of over 5,000 words". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa, Stfg, and Coordinator emeritus SMasters. 19:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC) To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
The article National Republican Trust Political Action Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Attack page consisting entirely of biased criticism.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Lionel (talk) 01:47, 18 March 2012 (UTC)