User talk:Esprit15d
Archived discussions
[edit]- From August 12, 2005 — December 31, 2005
- From January 1, 2006 — June 30, 2006
- From July 1, 2006 — December 31, 2006
- From January 1, 2007 — June 30, 2007
- From July 1, 2007 — December 31, 2007
- From January 1, 2008 — June 30, 2008
- From July 1, 2008 — December 31, 2008
- From January 1, 2009 — June 30, 2009
- From July 1, 2009 — December 31, 2010
- From January 1, 2010 — June 30, 2010
- From July 1, 2010 — December 31, 2010
- From January 1, 2011 — June 30, 2011
- From July 1, 2011 — June 30, 2014
- From July 1, 2014 — June 30, 2018
- From July 1, 2018 — December 31, 2018
"Last" is used for three or more things. "Latter" is used for two things.
I agree. The three things are "arson, manslaughter, and six counts of first-degree murder".
Thanks.
Eac2222 (talk) 22:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
Rami Malek
[edit]Hello:
The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Rami Malek has been completed.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.
I certainly think the article is at the stage where it can be nominated, and would achieve, Good Article status.
Over the long term I have a couple of suggestions. I did not check, but I suspect that a number of statements are supported by two or three citations. This is overkill - one reputable/renowned source will do, as I'm sure you know. Not surprisingly with so many contributors the citation style is inconsistent and should also be looked at. Neither of these should prevent the article from achieving Good Article status. I like the fact it has not fallen prey to the tendency to include laundry lists of reviews, quotes etc... It is nice and succinct, covering the salient points,
Best of luck with the GA nomination when you get to it.
Regards,
Twofingered Typist
- @Twofingered Typist: Thank you so much for your feedback and help. I'll take a look at your suggestions. If I have any questions, I'll let you know. Thanks again.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Esprit15d: I saw your note to contributors to the Malek article. What I meant about the citations is to make sure the fields are in the correct order for the type of citation being used. For example the template cite web has the following in the order specified: For references with author credit
The cite web citation includes in this orderf: |url= |title= |last= |first= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=
For references without author credit
The cite web citation includes in this order |url= |title= |author= |date= |website= |publisher= |access-date= |quote=}}
The date of the article, and the date the article was accessed by the person using it as a citation will be different. An access-date must be included, but it will not match the article date.
This article Wikipedia:Citing sources (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources} has links to each of the types of citation and their format. I hope this clarifies what I meant, Sorry for the confusion. Twofingered Typist (talk) 20:37, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of podcasting companies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC Radio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 18 January 2019 (UTC)
Question
[edit]Hello! I am interested in an edit you made to the page
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josh_Tyrangiel
In which you wrote (and more recently reinstated) a "list of notable interviews"
Question: where is this information from?
Any help much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaojiocoijcoij (talk • contribs) 03:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Iaojiocoijcoij:: At a glance, it appears that some of them already have references and some were cover articles (presumably from when he was at Time). I can't say for sure where that information was originally sourced from, but I can assist you in finding references. I'm working on another project at the moment, but when I get a chance, I'll drop in.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 03:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks so much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iaojiocoijcoij (talk • contribs) 04:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Icw
[edit]Template:Icw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [Username Needed] 11:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Book Your Own Fucking Life listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Book Your Own Fucking Life. Since you had some involvement with the Book Your Own Fucking Life redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Icw
[edit]Template:Icw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. [Username Needed] 14:47, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Leading ladies (game) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leading ladies (game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading ladies (game) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xain36 (talk) 17:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Rapture of Canaan for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Rapture of Canaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Rapture of Canaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Leviv ich 03:31, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Matthews Band - Bartender.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dave Matthews Band - Bartender.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The-Lonely-Island-Popstar-Never-Stop-Never-Stopping-Album.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:The-Lonely-Island-Popstar-Never-Stop-Never-Stopping-Album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of accolades received by Amadeus (film)
[edit]Hello, Esprit15d. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of accolades received by Amadeus".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 04:36, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Sam's Town logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
[edit]- Hi Esprit15d! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 15:02, Friday, April 19, 2019 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Georgia Tann article
[edit]I was looking at the Georgia Tann article, and noticed what looks like an error in the "Notable cases" section you added: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Georgia_Tann&diff=888117071&oldid=888045697
Based on the dates listed the babies in question would have been born ~ 1955, or 5 years after Georgia Tann's death. You've added a paper magazine as a reference here, so I can't check where the error originates. If you've still got access to that magazine, could you double check whether the numbers are correct? Or whether it is printing an interview that was conducted years earlier, maybe? --James (talk) 07:40, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- @James:I didn't do the math when I added the statement, but you are correct, their birth would have been 5 years after she died. But, I reviewed the article again (you can see an abstract here: http://www.readabstracts(DOT)com/Family-and-marriage/Happy-families-As-young-as-they-feel-age-is-a-state-of-mind.html - replace "DOT" ) and it did say that her twins were born 37 years previously. So, clearly she's mistaken, and the article didn't fact check. I will just remove the statement from the article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:26, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
File:With a Little Help From My Friends - Joe Cocker.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:With a Little Help From My Friends - Joe Cocker.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 06:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
Barnett article
[edit]When I added the advertisement tag, I did nmot mean particularly advertising for the subject's firm, but for the causes they advocate for & the people they defend. No matter how highly I think of the merits, it still isn't right for an encyclopedia . DGG ( talk ) 02:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- @DGG:I admit a was a bit surprised to see that tag added. I am all for collaboration, so I read through the article again more critically, but I'm not really seeing any language that would justify a tag at the top of the article. I'm curious to know if you can give specific examples of as advocacy for the cause, promotional external links, or NPOV language. I'm open to discussion, but I'm not seeing a justification for the use of that tag. --Esprit15d • talk • contribs 02:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- I agree we need a better tag to avoid confusion. I ought to write one. But I will also look again at the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- We'll keep chipping away at it.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- I've looked at it again. Problems include: the material and references discussing Kardashian West's sponsorship of her organization, which seems peripherial and disproportate in length. Then, there is some ambiguity in the number of people she for whom she helped get clemency for. It claims 17, which is probably the number for her organization as a whole. It only mentions two , and I assume these are ones for whome she was either the principal attorney, or one of the principal attorneys--it is't clear which. More basic, and what caught my eye, is section 3, discussing in some detail two of the cases, If we have articles on the cases, the material would belong there; I do not think we do, so probably a single sentence each might be appropriate. (they are also mentioned earlier, and I think that's the appropriate content) The inclusion of the comments of the judges is advocacy for the cause. The inclusion of herself praising her own work, complete with full caps, is puffery.
- We'll keep chipping away at it.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:10, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- I agree we need a better tag to avoid confusion. I ought to write one. But I will also look again at the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- there are similar problems with some of the cases for Kathleen Zellner. How to balance articles on lawyers like this is a problem, that has not been solved. How to deal with tneed to advocate here for things one wants to advocate for is a recurrent problem. I personally tend to be rather cold-blooded, because I'm concerned with setting an example to be used by promotional editors writing articles for attorneys. But I can understand a view that one should get in as much information as one can without being too conspicuous about it. I would support full articles on the individuals in wrongful conviction cases whenever possible. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- @DGG:I by no means think the article is complete or perfect. But, I'll address your specific issues individually:
the material and references discussing Kardashian West's sponsorship of her organization, which seems peripherial and disproportate in length
The references about Kim Kardashian's relation to the issue aren't really "references." They are substantiating the assertion in the article that the issue was widely reported on, which they undoubtedly were. The coverage of her involvement is not disproportionate either. Kardashian is the primary (if not sole) funder the effort and is essentially the "celebrity face" of Barnett, which Kardashian openly admits. As there is no question that Kardashian's personal meetings with Jared Kushner, Ivanka Trump, and other members of Trump's cabinet, as well as a meeting with the president himself (that he personally insisted be covered by the White House press staff as well outside reporters) is notable. True, whenever Kim Kardashian shows up (not to even mention Trump himself) the tone is a bit salacious because of their public images. But that is not relevant to the fact that it was a notable event and relevant to Barnett's efforts, since that meeting directly led to Trump continuing Obama's policy of clemency for nonviolent drug offenses (which I doubt he would have done otherwise), as well as the the introduction of the First Step Act into law. It claims 17, which is probably the number for her organization as a whole. It only mentions two , and I assume these are ones for whome she was either the principal attorney, or one of the principal attorneys--it is't clear which.
Barnett is the only attorney in her "organization," although she is a professor at her alma mater and enlists the help of the law students to do some of her research. The number 17 is the the prisoners that been released in the last three months--not total--and the article mentions that she worked with another attorney names MiAngel during the campaign. That is absolutely verifiable. I could actually include citations of docket cases in the article, but it would go against Wikipedia's policy WP:PRIMARY. Not all of the cases notable, and so not all of them are discussed here. I've only included cases that had wide media coverage.- In response to this:
More basic, and what caught my eye, is section 3, discussing in some detail two of the cases. If we have articles on the cases, the material would belong there; I do not think we do, so probably a single sentence each might be appropriate.
, while I respect your opinion, it doesn't reflect [Wikipedia policy or precedent: there is EXTENSIVE precedent in Wikipedia for law offices, lawyers, and judges articles to include notable cases. Barnet has litigated MANY cases, not only in advocacy, but in the financial world. However, most of them are not notable and should not be included in wikipedia. The ones included, however, are notable, because they received widespread coverage in the media. This is the equivalent of a singer articles including coverage his/her discography, or a senator's article including coverage of principle legislation that she/he authored. Covering summaries of notable cases of a lawyer is the same. For examples of other comparable articles that have FA or GA standing, see the following: Jack Thompson (activist), Sonia Sotomayor, F. Lee Bailey, Antonin Scalia, Henry W. Sawyer, Kenesaw Mountain Landis, Learned Hand, Tom Denning, Baron Denning, Richard Goldstone, Patrick Hastings, Adrian S. Fisher, Ted Frank, Clifford Scott Green. I'll also include my comments on the talk page of the article.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
- @DGG:I by no means think the article is complete or perfect. But, I'll address your specific issues individually:
- there are similar problems with some of the cases for Kathleen Zellner. How to balance articles on lawyers like this is a problem, that has not been solved. How to deal with tneed to advocate here for things one wants to advocate for is a recurrent problem. I personally tend to be rather cold-blooded, because I'm concerned with setting an example to be used by promotional editors writing articles for attorneys. But I can understand a view that one should get in as much information as one can without being too conspicuous about it. I would support full articles on the individuals in wrongful conviction cases whenever possible. DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
- I'll reply on the article talk p. , DGG ( talk ) 10:45, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
- but, briefly,1/not all have discussion of individual cases; 2/ the ones that do have less detailed discussion of the individual cases they mention--sometimes very much less discussion; 3 /it's more justified in an article about a supreme court judge, whose rulings make actual law 4/some of this are truly historic cases, 4/ WP:EINSTEIN . DGG ( talk ) 03:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of GA quick-fail user talk messages
[edit]Template:QF-NPOV, Template:QF-source, Template:QF-tags, Template:QF-unfolding and Template:QF-unstable have been nominated for merging with Template:QF. Since you had some involvement with the creation of these templates, you might be interested in participating in the discussion. eπi (talk | contribs) 00:13, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Updating dates in "use mdy" templates
[edit]Hi, Esprit15d. In script edits like this one, is it intentional that the month year date in the "use mdy" template is being updated from when the template was added to the current month? -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- @JHunterJ: Yes. According to the template usage notes, "Use the parameter |date= for the month and year that an editor or bot last checked the article for inconsistent date formatting and fixed any found." Happy editing!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:52, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Brothers Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Make Your Move (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Producers-logo.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Producers-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Scott-Living-Logo-Final-300x300.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Scott-Living-Logo-Final-300x300.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Scott Brothers Entertainment.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:The Scott Brothers Entertainment.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:The Scott Brothers logo.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:The Scott Brothers logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scott Brothers Global, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Wang (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 00:40, 27 June 2019 (UTC)
The file File:Ocean's 12 soundtrack.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Ocean's Twelve#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Rami Malek
[edit]Hi, I placed the article Rami Malek on hold, I've also placed my comments concerning the article here. Please feel free to message me on my Talk Page if you have any questions or obligations. NightBag10 (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
Just wondering…
[edit]Just wondering how changing № to No. can be considered a spelling/typo issue when the numero sign article itself utilises №? Also, what's wrong with №? DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:09, 18 July 2019 (UTC)
- @DynamoDegsy:, please refer to policy MOS:NUMBERSIGN.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
"middle ages" isn't a typo
[edit]See this discussion at MOS. Internal consistency is more important, and in that article's case I was following the style of a source I had quoted. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 09:02, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
New Albion edits
[edit]Thank you so much for the edits you made to the New Albion article. Your edits are not ones with which I am familiar, and I appreciate the assistance in improving this article. I will adapt my future writing to incorporate what I learned from your work.Hu Nhu (talk) 01:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
- @Hu Nhu:Glad I could help!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 01:25, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 16
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derek Waters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Second City (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:28, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Walter Mercado
[edit]On 4 November 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Walter Mercado, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 15:14, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Hi. I've opened a GAR on the The Killers article for which you are a main contributor. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing and other issues. Following the guidelines at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment, I'm letting you know in case you're interested in helping to resolve the concerns, though you are under no obligation to do anything. See Talk:The Killers/GA1 for more details. SilkTork (talk) 05:07, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 3
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berndnaut Smilde, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RWA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
Esprit15d, just a reminder that you have had this review open for months, and had promised to return to it nearly three weeks ago. Please give it attention at your next opportunity. Thank you. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:50, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
- Esprit15d, it's been another two weeks without any action on the review. I hope you're having a happy holiday season. If you can't return by the end of the year, I'll do my best to find a new reviewer; it isn't fair to the nominator to be left hanging for over three months like this. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:08, 26 December 2019 (UTC)
- Please consider yourself off this review effective immediately. I will be finding a new reviewer. I'm sorry this didn't work out, but it's been nearly four months, which is too long to expect any nominator to wait. I hope you're having a Happy New Year. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
"Human penis size/Archive 2" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Human penis size/Archive 2. Since you had some involvement with the Human penis size/Archive 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:44, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Wonderland Village
[edit]An older article of mine. Looks like a lot of the sources are 404 so that doesn't help. But this seems like exactly the kind of significant coverage we're looking for. I'm working on adding more Detroit Free Press articles to give historical context. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 21:51, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- ETA: One source I added claims that at the time of construction, it had the largest Montgomery Ward store in the chain. Given that notability is not temporary, would this be a sufficient enough claim to notability? Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:04, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TenPoundHammer:I saw that the article was created in the Wild West days of WP. But the Montgomery Ward mention definitely seems more notable.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- If you feel that's enough for notability, you can withdraw. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:45, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- @TenPoundHammer:I saw that the article was created in the Wild West days of WP. But the Montgomery Ward mention definitely seems more notable.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:46, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
FAN for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album)
[edit]Hi. I have recently opened a featured-article nomination for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album). I found your name at a past FA review and wanted to ask if you would be interested in offering a review to the nomination. isento (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:WEASeL" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:WEASeL. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:WEASeL redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 16:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
[edit]Great job on the Phoebe Judge additions! JoelWhy?(talk) 20:30, 23 April 2020 (UTC) |
- Thank you! She deserves a quality article!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:29, 24 April 2020 (UTC)
File:Phoebe Judge's signature.png listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Phoebe Judge's signature.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:NCR
[edit]Template:NCR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 06:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of The Infographics Show for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Infographics Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infographics Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ❤︎PrincessPandaWiki (talk | contribs) 17:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TIGlogo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:TIGlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Samples of "These Foolish Things (Remind Me of You)" at FFD
[edit]Hello. I nominated the audio samples of "These Foolish Things (Remind Me of You)", which you uploaded, for discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 June 2#Recordings of "These Foolish Things (Remind Me of You)", to which I'm inviting you. --George Ho (talk) 20:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
"Exception(computing)" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Exception(computing). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 5#Exception(computing) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Tea2min (talk) 09:37, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
Half Million Award
[edit]The Half Million Award | |
For your contributions to bring Manchester by the Sea (film) (estimated annual readership: 685,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Half Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 14:07, 6 June 2020 (UTC) |
- @Reidgreg: Thank you! I'm sincerely delighted.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:52, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
Manchester by the Sea (film)
[edit]Hello, Esprit15d. This is a courtesy notice that the copy edit you requested for Manchester by the Sea (film) at the Guild of Copy Editors requests page is now complete. All feedback welcome! Cheers, Baffle☿gab 09:27, 10 June 2020 (UTC) |
Nomination of Ramani Durvasula for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ramani Durvasula is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramani Durvasula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hatchens (talk) 11:40, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
AWB editing
[edit]Hallo, please check that AWB is actually proposing sensible edits. In this edit, as well as usefully fixing a couple of slanted apostrophes, and adding birth and death date cats, you managed to add some stray commas before references. The next editor then reverted the whole lot. I've rescued what was OK of your edit, but please slow down and check. Thanks. PamD 14:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- @PamD:I think what happened is the original editor puts commas between references if there is more than one for some reason. AWB moved the comma before the reference, but there was also a period there. Anyway, if I see that again, I'll catch it.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:14, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's not very clever of AWB! I've already dropped a note to the other editor to point out that refs aren't separated by either spaces or commas: couldn't find anything in MOS to say so but showed him the example of today's Featured Article as an example of how to do it. PamD 16:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- @PamD:Thanks for the heads up. I'll keep an eye out if I come across double punctuation again.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 16:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hmm, that's not very clever of AWB! I've already dropped a note to the other editor to point out that refs aren't separated by either spaces or commas: couldn't find anything in MOS to say so but showed him the example of today's Featured Article as an example of how to do it. PamD 16:43, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
AWB and Short Description
[edit]Hi - I see you just edited Krupp using AWB just after I edited it. Unfortunately the current released binary moves hatnotes above short description, in violation of MOS:ORDER. The AWB guys fixed the bug soon after releasing 6.1.0.1, nearly a year ago, and I've been trying to get their attention for a new binary. Other people have been fixing the bug with two double-clicks. I have a binary built from the latest source if you're interested. David Brooks (talk) 17:07, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks:Thanks for letting me know! I wasn't aware. I'll keep that in mind going forward. BTW, I wasn't correcting your edit deliberately; the timing on that was coincidence.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:02, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound like an accusation! Thanks for responding. And I said two double-clicks because, unfortunately, AWB diff sees the change as separate delete+insert (not move) so you have to undo both changes. David Brooks (talk) 18:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- @DavidBrooks:I took it as you meant it. Thanks again for the tip!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 21:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't mean that to sound like an accusation! Thanks for responding. And I said two double-clicks because, unfortunately, AWB diff sees the change as separate delete+insert (not move) so you have to undo both changes. David Brooks (talk) 18:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:UE
[edit]Template:UE has been nominated for merging with Template:Uselanguage. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 13:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:LIVE" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Wikipedia:LIVE. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 1#Wikipedia:LIVE until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Sysages (talk | contribs) 17:25, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Women in Red
[edit]Hi there, Esprit15d, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to have another new member with years of Wikipedia experience. I see you've created a number of biographies, including several about women. We look forward to many more. If you have not already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Ipigott:Thank you so much for the welcome, and I can't wait to help out. I will look over that essay. Thanks again!--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:33, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Clocks" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Clocks. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 29#Clocks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Me and Bobby McGee - Roger Miller.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Me and Bobby McGee - Roger Miller.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Notifications
[edit]To create a ping, you must simultaneously place a ping template and sign a post. Adding a ping to an existing talk item does nothing (to make it work, you’d also have to change the signature time stamp). Schwede66 19:12, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for merging of Template:Duflu
[edit]Template:Duflu has been nominated for merging with Template:Needtrans. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. – SD0001 (talk) 06:30, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Presidency of Joe Biden (November 7)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Presidency of Joe Biden and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Presidency of Joe Biden, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Esprit15d!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zoozaz1 talk 22:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
|
- FYI for anyone reading this--this wasn't my article. I was trying to determine if an article that was in drafts related to the Biden presidency with a soft redirect had to be used, or if we could start over from scratch. We ultimately started over from scratch because the draft version was in poor condition.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 17:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erick Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lawndale, Chicago.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Erick Williams moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Erick Williams, is too highly promotional as written to remain published. It needs to not resemble a web page or advertisement for the chef or his restaurant. Probably removing the quotations would be a good first step, but it would need considerable rewriting. I would have listed it for deletion except that it ddes have decent references. (and remove the see also's to better-known chefs--that's namedropping) I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DGG ( talk ) 06:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- @DGG:While I respect your opinion, I am not a fan of this chef, nor do I have any particular interest in him beyond the fact that he is repeatedly coming up in my online and radio journey, and he merits an article. I have been adding information to his article as I've perused sources and listened to interviews, which I am still in the process of doing. Also, those chefs are not namedropping whatsoever, they are all chefs in the Chicago gastronomic community, especially that make ethnocentric cuisine. You may not realize he is that same caliber chef as they are, and was the executive chef at MK for years.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 11:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm glad you have no COI, but it is customary to ask.
- listing better known people as see also (or in the article) without a very direct connection with the subject, not just " chefs in ... Chicago" is unambiguously name dropping. You seem to have made it much worse. It needs to be half the length, not double He probably deserves an article, so why not write something that doesnt sound like PR? DGG ( talk ) 17:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- @DGG:I'm sincerely at a loss at what about it sounds like PR, especially since writing about him feels like another day at the office. I just re-read the policy on NPOV to see if there was something I was missing: my sources are unbiased, I don't make any subjective assertions about him (e.g "he's an outstanding chef"), I've included "verifiable public and scholarly critiques", couldn't find any weasel words. I also didn't see any undue weight on any particular topic, although I'd welcome specific feedback if someone disagreed with that. I deleted the See Also section (shrug). To be honest, I don't really "write" articles ever, especially in this case since my knowledge of him is limited. I'm just building it based on sources I have access to: Newspaper.com, Ebscohost, Gale, Google (obviously) through my Wikipedia library account. I am making my way through the sources about him, and if there is something that seems biographic in it, I add it to the article with a reference. Many of the articles I skip because it's just him talking with another chef or interviewer about Chicago, or Brionna Taylor, or his grandma. So asking me to not write PR, from my perspective, seems like, don't add what you see in the sources. Because I completely ambivalent about this topic. If you gave more specific feedback I could review it for what your'e referring to.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- I guess we were passing each other. I'll review your comments.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- Just mentioning, it's not that it's PR, but that it reads like PR. It can be very hard to avoid, since almost all the writing in the sources is PR. DGG ( talk ) 18:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
- @DGG:I'm sincerely at a loss at what about it sounds like PR, especially since writing about him feels like another day at the office. I just re-read the policy on NPOV to see if there was something I was missing: my sources are unbiased, I don't make any subjective assertions about him (e.g "he's an outstanding chef"), I've included "verifiable public and scholarly critiques", couldn't find any weasel words. I also didn't see any undue weight on any particular topic, although I'd welcome specific feedback if someone disagreed with that. I deleted the See Also section (shrug). To be honest, I don't really "write" articles ever, especially in this case since my knowledge of him is limited. I'm just building it based on sources I have access to: Newspaper.com, Ebscohost, Gale, Google (obviously) through my Wikipedia library account. I am making my way through the sources about him, and if there is something that seems biographic in it, I add it to the article with a reference. Many of the articles I skip because it's just him talking with another chef or interviewer about Chicago, or Brionna Taylor, or his grandma. So asking me to not write PR, from my perspective, seems like, don't add what you see in the sources. Because I completely ambivalent about this topic. If you gave more specific feedback I could review it for what your'e referring to.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of First 100 days of Joe Biden's presidency for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article First 100 days of Joe Biden's presidency is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/First 100 days of Joe Biden's presidency until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG talk 20:15, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK reviews
[edit]Hi, thanks for helping out with DYK reviews. Please read WP:DYK and WP:DYKSG to familiarize yourself with all the criteria. I have just returned Template:Did you know nominations/Michelle Curran to the nominations page because you gave approval ticks without even doing a review. Yoninah (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Orphaned non-free image File:Don Henley - Boys of Summer.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Don Henley - Boys of Summer.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:30, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Sean Cole
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Sean Cole at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Innisfree987 (talk) 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
- These notices always seem to be in a hurry, so just to say, no rush. Happy editing, Innisfree987 (talk) 00:59, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
December with Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:43, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Jessie Maltin for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jessie Maltin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jessie Maltin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 06:37, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
GOCE copyedit request
[edit]I've begun my first pass at copyediting the article Ira Glass. Please expect a ping on the article's talk page as I will most likely have questions. My process can be found here. —Tenryuu 🐲 ( 💬 • 📝 ) (🎁 Wishlist! 🎁) 21:33, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK for Sean Cole
[edit]On 14 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sean Cole, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that This American Life producer and Boston native Sean Cole spoke with an affected British accent from age 14 to 16? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sean Cole. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sean Cole), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
—valereee (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
Merry Christmas
[edit]Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2021! | |
Hello Esprit15d, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2021. Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages. |
Celebrate this Christmas with great joy, happiness and gratitude. Merry Christmas to you and your family!RAJIVVASUDEV (talk) 05:02, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
The Boys of Summer (song) audio samples at FFD
[edit]File:DJ Sammy - Boys of Summer.ogg and File:The Ataris - Boys Of Summer.ogg, which you listed, are listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 December 27. --George Ho (talk) 07:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
A New Year With Women in Red!
[edit]Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:48, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Natalie Merchant Ophelia.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Natalie Merchant Ophelia.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
April editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Concern regarding Draft:Erick Williams
[edit]Hello, Esprit15d. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Erick Williams, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:35, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Your draft article, Draft:Erick Williams
[edit]Hello, Esprit15d. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Erick Williams".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:53, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
June 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Weezer - Peace.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Weezer - Peace.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:05, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021
[edit]Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive | |
July 2021 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Matthews Band - Typical Situation.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dave Matthews Band - Typical Situation.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Matthews Band - Jimi Thing.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Dave Matthews Band - Jimi Thing.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
August Editathons at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:24, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Céline Dion - The Power of Love.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Céline Dion - The Power of Love.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
October 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:35, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The file File:Dave Matthews Band - -34.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sample insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
The file File:The White Stripes -- In the Cold Cold Night.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sample insufficiently supported by critical commentary of Meg White. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
- File:Lazaretto (excerpt).ogg
- File:John Mayer - Free Fallin'.ogg
- File:Dave Matthews Band - Grey Street.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
File:DMB - Ants Marching.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:DMB - Ants Marching.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
- File:DMB - Satellite.ogg
- File:Dave Matthews Band - Two Step.ogg
- File:DMB - What Would You Say.ogg
- File:DMB - Crash.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Jack owens - hukilau song sample 1.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
- File:Who Did You Think I Was.ogg
- File:Elton John I Guess That's Why They Call It the Blues.ogg
- File:Kinks, The - Picture Book.ogg
- File:Hukilau - BIG Pineapple 4.ogg
- File:John Mayer - Try.ogg
- File:John Mayer - Waiting on the World to Change.ogg
- File:Great High Mountain - Jack White.ogg
- File:Island Music - Hawaiian - Don Ho - Hukilau Song (1) 4.ogg
- File:Johnny Cash - One Piece at a Time.ogg
- File:Billie Jean Chris Cornell.ogg
- File:Sitting on Top of the World - Jack White.ogg
- File:Don Henley - Taking You Home 6.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Franz Ferdinand - Take Me Out.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Franz Ferdinand - Take Me Out.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
- File:Franz Ferdinand - The Fallen.ogg
- File:Common - Go.ogg
- File:Franz Ferdinand - Eleanor Put Your Boots On.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Michael Bublé Feeling Good.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Michael Bublé Feeling Good.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
Also:
- File:Carterguncongo.jpg
- File:Carterkemcongo.jpg
- File:Cartermomlimo.jpg
- File:Coldplay - Clocks.ogg
- File:Janis Joplin - Me and Bobby McGee.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Various Artists - Bridget Jones - The Edge Of Reason.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Various Artists - Bridget Jones - The Edge Of Reason.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Franz Ferdinand - Do You Want To.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary of Do You Want To. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
- File:John Mayer - Slow Dancing in a Burning Room.ogg
- File:K-Ci and JoJo - All My Life.ogg
- File:Brett Dennen - Ain't No Reason.ogg
- File:Franz Ferdinand - Walk Away.ogg
- File:Coldplay - Fix You.ogg
- File:The Killers - Romeo and Juliet -Live-.ogg
- File:Gin Blossoms - Allison Road.ogg
- File:Gin Blossoms - Til I Hear it From You.ogg
- File:The Killers - Tranquilize.ogg
- File:Gin Blossoms - Follow You Down.ogg
- File:Rascal Flatts - Fast Cars and Freedom.ogg
- File:Gin Blossoms - Found Out About You.ogg
- File:Rascal Flatts - Feels Like Today.ogg
- File:John Mayer - Gravity.ogg
- File:Fantasia - I Believe.ogg
- File:The Raconteurs - Salute Your Solution.ogg
- File:Gin Blossoms - Until I Fall Away.ogg
- File:Salute Your Solution video screencap.jpg
- File:Michael Buble - You Don't Know Me.ogg
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Michael Buble - You Don't Know Me.ogg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Michael Buble - You Don't Know Me.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Waiting on the World to Change Limited Edition EP.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
November 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:27, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
The file File:India.Arie - Heart of the Matter.ogg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary about The Heart of the Matter (song). May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Also:
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:OFAN
[edit]Template:OFAN has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:09, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]December 2021 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:10, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
File:Gin Blossoms - Hey Jealousy.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gin Blossoms - Hey Jealousy.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
The file File:Foo Fighters - Next Year.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Insufficiently supported by critical commentary in context. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022 Women in Red
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022
[edit]Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive | |
January 2022 Backlog Drive:
| |
Other ways to participate: | |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive.
Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. |
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).
The file File:My House the scott brothers eric paslay.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Cover art insufficiently supported by critical commentary. May fail WP:NFCC#8.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:02, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
February with Women in Red
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
[edit]Women in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:37, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Category:Song articles missing an audio sample
[edit]Category:Song articles missing an audio sample has been nominated for renaming to Category:Wikipedia requested audio of songs. Please see WP:CFDS. – Fayenatic London 12:57, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
April Editathons from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination for deletion of Template:2020 Webby Awards
[edit]Template:2020 Webby Awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sybil DVD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Sybil DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
May Women in Red events
[edit]Women in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
[edit]Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. |
June events from Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:20, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of The Infographics Show for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infographics Show (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DannyC55 (Talk) 23:15, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red in July 2022
[edit]Women in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:45, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in August 2022
[edit]Women in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:57, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
[edit]Women in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:34, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
File:10,000 Maniacs Because The Night.ogg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:10,000 Maniacs Because The Night.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2022
[edit]Women in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 14:58, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
[edit]Women in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2022
[edit]Women in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:53, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2023
[edit]Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:00, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Wikipedia:ALF" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Wikipedia:ALF and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 30 § Wikipedia:ALF until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zerbu Talk 02:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SBP logo.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:SBP logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red in February 2023
[edit] Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
[edit] Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
"Tracy LaGondino" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Tracy LaGondino has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 15 § Tracy LaGondino until a consensus is reached. {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 21:35, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2023
[edit] Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:The Newlyweds DVD.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:The Newlyweds DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who convert reference tags has been nominated for discussion
[edit]Category:Wikipedians who convert reference tags has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:32, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, following that consensus I have also nominated Template:User ref for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion#May_4,_2023. – Fayenatic London 11:13, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2023
[edit] Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
[edit] Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on Edward William Cox
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Edward William Cox, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can William Cox&preloadparams%5b%5d=1164044111 report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
[edit]Women in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
[edit] Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women In Red
[edit] Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Under Great White Norther Lights - Meg and Jack.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Under Great White Norther Lights - Meg and Jack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red October 2023
[edit] Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
[edit] Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
[edit] Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
15 years ago... question about source
[edit]Can you find the Uncut magazine source you used for this edit, including the quote "quality control is close to impeccable"? It's such a strange thing for a critic to say. Binksternet (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Women in Red January 2024
[edit]Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Unreferenced articles February 2024 backlog drive
[edit]WikiProject Unreferenced articles | February 2024 Backlog Drive | |
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.
| |
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Menendez brothers - mug shot.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Menendez brothers - mug shot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red February 2024
[edit]Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
CS1 error on The Frozen Deep
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page The Frozen Deep, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to join New pages patrol
[edit]Hello Esprit15d!
- The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.
Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red March 2024
[edit]Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New page reviewer granted
[edit]Hi Esprit15d. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers
" user group. Please check back at the permissions page in case your user right is time-limited or probationary. This user group allows you to review new pages through the Curation system and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or nominate them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is vital to maintaining the integrity of the encyclopedia. If you have not already done so, you must read the tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the deletion policy. If you need any help or want to discuss the process, you are welcome to use the new page reviewer talk page or ask via the NPP Discord. In addition, please remember:
- Be nice to new editors. They are usually not aware that they are doing anything wrong. Do make use of the message feature when tagging pages for maintenance so that they are aware.
- You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted. Please be formal and polite in your approach to them – even if they are not.
- If you are not sure what to do with a page, don't review it – just leave it for another reviewer.
- Accuracy is more important than speed. Take your time to patrol each page, including checking for copyright violations using Earwig's copyright violation detector, checking for duplicate articles, and evaluating sources (both in the article, and if needed, via a Google search) for compliance with the general notability guideline.
- Please review some of our flowcharts (1, 2) to help ensure you don't forget any steps.
- Use the message feature to communicate with article creators and offer advice as much as possible.
The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you also may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In cases of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, or long-term inactivity, the right may be withdrawn at administrator discretion. If you can read any languages other than English, please add yourself to the list of new page reviewers with language proficiencies. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:36, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2024
[edit]Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024
[edit]Hello Esprit15d,
Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.
Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.
Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.
It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!
2023 Awards
Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!
WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.
Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.
Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Pages Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2024
[edit]Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of The Infographics Show for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Infographics Show (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.2003 LN6 19:09, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red June 2024
[edit]Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Highdeal, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:01, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red July 2024
[edit]Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
[edit]Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive
[edit]New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
September 2024 at Women in Red
[edit]Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
[edit]Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:05, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
WikiProject Unreferenced articles November 2024 backlog drive
[edit]WikiProject Unreferenced articles | November 2024 Backlog Drive | |
There is a substantial backlog of unsourced articles on Wikipedia, and we need your help! The purpose of this drive is to add sources to these unsourced articles and make a meaningful impact.
| |
You're receiving this message because you have subscribed to the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:06, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
[edit]Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:46, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Welcome to the drive!
[edit]Welcome, welcome, welcome Esprit15d! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
Cielquiparle (talk) 12:14, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
CS1 error on Emmy Braun
[edit]Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Emmy Braun, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2024 (UTC)