Jump to content

User:RAJIVVASUDEV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
European spruce bark beetle

The European spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus), is a species of bark beetle in the true weevil family, Curculionidae. It is found in Europe and Asia Minor and east to China, Japan, North Korea and South Korea. Bark beetles are so named because they reproduce in the inner bark, living and dead phloem tissues, of trees. Their preferred trees in which to reside include spruces, firs, pines and larches. The species has the ability to spread quickly over large areas and some scientists hypothesize that long-distance movements originating from the Iberian Peninsula may have contributed to its invasion of northern Norway spruce forests. This female European spruce bark beetle was photographed in Naninne in the province of Namur, Belgium.

Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus
FRV DANA

RV is my pseudonym, and I am a textile professional and an avid reader with a strong interest in learning about new technologies. I have a passion for both historical and modern textile subjects, and the majority of my editing work focuses on topics related to textiles.

Welcome to my User Page

[edit]

Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. This usually means that secular academia is given prominence over any individual sect's doctrines, though those doctrines may be discussed in an appropriate section that clearly labels those beliefs for what they are. — User:Ian.thomson

Tip of the day

[edit]
Editing articles for web accessibility

Web accessibility is the goal of making web pages easier to navigate and read. While this is primarily intended to assist those with disabilities, it can be helpful to all readers.

While editing articles, keep in mind the goal of making Wikipedia web accessible. All users, regardless of ability, should be able to read, navigate, and contribute to Wikipedia easily.

The Accessibility section of Wikipedia's Manual of Style (MOS) is a valuable resource that provides helpful guidelines. In addition, Accessibility dos and do nots is a quick summary of the most important guidelines for editors.

WikiProject Accessibility is a group of editors promoting better access for disabled and other users. For more information, such as what you can do to help, see the main project page.

To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use {{totd}}

Motto

[edit]
Bookshelf

Today's motto...

Hook update

[edit]
Hook update
Your hook reached 15,970 views (665.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of December 2022 – nice work!
Hook update
Your hook reached 14,794 views (616.4 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2023 – nice work!
Hook update
Your hook reached 19,051 views (793.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2023 – nice work!

User boxes

[edit]
My User boxes
This user is a participant in WikiProject Reliability.
This user is a member of the WikiProject Unreferenced articles.
This editor is a WikiGnome.
This user is a member of
WikiProject Textile Arts.
This user is a member of the Fashion WikiProject.
This user is a participant in WikiProject History.
This user is a Microwikipædian.
This user uses HotCat.
This user is a participant in WikiProject Short descriptions.
This user has extended confirmed rights on the English Wikipedia. (verify)
This user fixes citations with the help of Citation bot.
This user is a WikiSloth.
This user is a native of Asia.
I try to do the right thing. If I make a mistake, please let me know.
This user has written or expanded 34 articles featured in the Did You Know section on the Main Page.
What did you do?This user includes edit summaries in their contributions and thinks that everybody should use them as well.
This user has been vaccinated against COVID-19.
This user is interested in the
Middle Ages

The barnstar

[edit]
Your contributions are appreciated.
Great work on adding to and helping to preserve Bolt 7&6=thirteen () 15:54, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
Thanks for your efforts in building up the encyclopedia. 7&6=thirteen () 18:51, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
The Christianity Barnstar
Dear RAJIVVASUDEV, I award you The Christianity Barnstar for all your hard work in WikiProject Christianity-related articles, especially your recent creation of care cloth. Keep up the good work! Your efforts are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 08:46, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Rescue list

[edit]

Tips and tools

[edit]

Objective

[edit]
  • Wikipedia's goal is to build and maintain an encyclopedia covering all branches of human knowledge.[1]
  • Medical topics: Jimmy Wales response

No, you have to be kidding me. Every single person who signed this petition needs to go back to check their premises and think harder about what it means to be honest, factual, truthful.

Wikipedia’s policies around this kind of thing are exactly spot-on and correct. If you can get your work published in respectable scientific journals – that is to say, if you can produce evidence through replicable scientific experiments, then Wikipedia will cover it appropriately. What we won’t do is pretend that the work of lunatic charlatans is the equivalent of “true scientific discourse. It isn’t.

Nicely done. Wales is essentially saying, we have standards. Deal with it.[2][3]

  • Wikipedia co-founder calls alt-medicine practitioners “lunatic charlatans”[4]
  • Knowledge is often defined as justified true belief.
    Knowledge, Awareness of facts or being competent.
Useful links
Mentors

Mentors

To do list

[edit]

Smiles

[edit]

[2][3][4]



Category:WikiProject Reliability participants Category:WikiProject Historical information participants Category:WikiProject Textile Arts

  1. ^ "Wikipedia:Did you know", Wikipedia, 2021-07-08, retrieved 2021-08-04
  2. ^ March 24, oracknows on; 2014. "An excellent response to complaints about medical topics on Wikipedia | ScienceBlogs". scienceblogs.com. Retrieved 2023-04-03. {{cite web}}: |last2= has numeric name (help)CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ "Standards of Evidence – Wikipedia Edition - NeuroLogica Blog". NeuroLogica Blog - Your Daily Fix of Neuroscience, Skepticism, and Critical Thinking. 2014-03-25. Retrieved 2023-04-03.
  4. ^ Geuss, Megan (2014-03-25). "Wikipedia founder calls alt-medicine practitioners "lunatic charlatans"". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2023-04-03.