User talk:Deisenbe/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Deisenbe. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Vicksburg
Your added mention about July 4th is duplicated in the same section, but also questioned. Valetude (talk) 16:17, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abdulrahman Ibrahim Ibn Sori, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Foster (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Treatment of slaves in the United States, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William L. Garrison (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:25, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
Category:Recipients of aid from Lewis Tappan has been nominated for discussion
Category:Recipients of aid from Lewis Tappan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
A Barnstar for you
|
The Content Creativity Barnstar | |
| For the creation of Union Literary Institute apparently from scratch in a short time. While there is no doubt further work to be done, this is an excellent addition to Wikipedia. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 02:12, 8 October 2019 (UTC) |
keeping the official NRHP name in NRHP infoboxes and NRHP list-articles
Hi Deisenbe, this edit by you caught my eye. And then I see you edited a bunch at Prudence Crandall Museum article. Offhand it looks like you have made good improvements. But hey, the NRHP infobox about a place needs to be titled by the official NRHP name for the place. And the county-level list of NRHP-listed places needs to show the official NRHP names for them. Even if, as I suppose might be the case here, the common name now for the place, or the otherwise better name for the article, is different. It is okay by me that the article is at "Museum", but the NRHP listing name is "House". And the NRHP name, if different, should usually be stated in bold in the lede of an article. All of this serves the reader who is looking for the NRHP place of that name, and we want to tell them that this article is what covers that. I hope you don't mind but I just edited at the article to restore the NRHP name in infobox and lede, and I will also change the list-article back to display the NRHP name. (Also, it is a lesser point, but some NRHP editors prefer for the link to go out to the NRHP name, and for readers then to be redirected to the different name of the article. That's a small, technical argument, probably not worth discussing.)
I hope you don't mind my addressing you this way, on this, i am just trying to be efficient. Now that I've said this much, though, can you please accept these things, or please do let's discuss further? And did you make similar changes elsewhere? sincerely, --Doncram (talk) 02:12, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Canterbury Female Boarding School, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reservation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Angelina Grimké, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page More (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:16, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
Cognitive dissonance
I see your edit count, and various accolades from other editors, where you seem to be helpful to WP. But then I see this (upon noticing the revert) and am rightfully confused. What prompted you to make that addition? It does not follow as substantiated from the article. So I am surprised that apparently knowing the guidelines/rules/etc - and it not being near April 1st - you tried to slip that into the article. Was this an aberration, or really your best judgement? Shenme (talk) 04:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
@Shenme: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pete-buttigieg-wouldnt-be-americas-first-gay-president/2019/03/26/0b7b1eb4-41de-11e9-922c-64d6b7840b82_story.html
Did you read Buchanan's Personal Life section? deisenbe (talk) 08:17, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
- It seems to me the WaPo article is yet more rehashing the same as found in the personal life section. Gems such as "At most it could suggest Buchanan was bisexual.", which in itself is 'establishing' a conclusion that can't be shown. The article said absolutely nothing new, nothing illuminating. It can *not* be used as a justification for your edit.
- As for the language, the particular words used, as mentioned again in that article, we have so many modern misunderstandings of text of even 100 years ago I'd mistrust near anyone's modern assumptions. Just recently at WP:ANI (FramGate) we had someone *freak* out at a word, either 'scold' or 'nag'. Yet it was *because* they had had no contact with older texts, no understanding of how words were used in even the recent past (which the other more conversant editor did know and use correctly) that they assumed something very prejudicial had been implied.
- I became sensitized to the seeming mis-usings of past figures for current agendas quite awhile ago when reading Agnes_Moorehead#Sexuality. Here is a whole section based on the gossip of a known character assassin and some author's "was reported to". I look at that section and wonder why is this here? Whose purposes does it serve? I don't wonder about her sexuality. I honestly don't care. I don't know who would care. For what purpose is that section there?
- I worry about the current mania to label people definitively. Whether it is 'RINO', 'liberal', "Never Trumper" or some specific politics, economic stance, or sexuality. We're up to 6 letters now, LGBTIQ? If we now accept differences, including that some people just don't care or want to opt out of the madness, why is it so important to definitively pin down a dead person's sexuality?
- That isn't the graceful acceptance of people's sexuality, being consequential only as they choose, and unimportant to the rest of the world with respect to all other conduct/accomplishments. Instead I'm reminded of counting coup. Please, we don't need more warriors putting feathers in their hair. Shenme (talk) 02:51, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lost Cause of the Confederacy. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Deceptive edit summaries at this point? You certainly know better. SummerPhDv2.0 02:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:27, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)
Sorry!
Sorry, I should be more clear. DMS means degrees (°), minutes(′), seconds(″). For example, Buckingham Palace's coordinates are given on Wikipedia as 51°30′3″N 0°8′31″W. D.dddd° is a decimal version with four digits of expansion, of slightly more precision than DMS. For example, the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City coordinates are given as 40.7794°N 73.9631°W for better centering on the main entry. In general, nearly every object on Earth can be assigned coordinates of either degrees, minutes, seconds or D.dddd. Some small objects such as statues and some objects that fall halfway between seconds of arc may require DMS.s, such as can be seen in the article on the Cherry Hill Fountain in Central Park. Going to or past DMS.ss or D.dddddd levels of expansion does not assist the reader, and exceeds the accuracy of Google maps, Bing maps, etc. Abductive (reasoning) 22:12, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
DYK for Union Literary Institute
On 7 November 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Union Literary Institute, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Union Literary Institute was established after the Indiana General Assembly barred African Americans from attending public schools? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Union Literary Institute. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Union Literary Institute), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lane Theological Seminary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antebellum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Taylor & Francis book
According to your user page, you have access to Taylor & Francis. Does that include T&F books or just journal articles? If the former, would you please send me chapters 4 &5 of this book? I would really appreciate it. Also, WP:RX is a great place to share resources. It is more active than the reference desk. buidhe 05:15, 30 November 2019 (UTC)
- {{cite book |last1=Feenan |first1=Dermot |title=Informal Criminal Justice|url=https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315182117 |date=2002 |publisher=Ashgate Publishing|location=Farnham |isbn=978-0-7546-2220-8 ||language=en
you:
- I'm sorry but I do not have access to it. With all of these collections of material, they're usually not complete. Sometimes they host books by cntract with their publishers but do not have the rights. I dd find these two articles by the author, if either interests you:
- Researching paramilitary violence in Northern Ireland
Dermot Feenan International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Volume 5, 2002 - Issue 2 Published Online: 26 Nov 2010
- Life, work and capital in legal practice
Dermot Feenan, James Hand & Barry Hough International Journal of the Legal Profession, Volume 23, 2016 - Issue 1 Published Online: 02 Mar 2016
deisenbe (talk) 00:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lyman Beecher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Rankin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 18:06, 16 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jamaican Maroons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashanti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jacob Ezekiel
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Jacob Ezekiel you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of From Hill To Shore -- From Hill To Shore (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Jacob Ezekiel
The article Jacob Ezekiel you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Jacob Ezekiel for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of From Hill To Shore -- From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:01, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 5
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Abolitionism in the United States (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mob
- Pennsylvania Hall (Philadelphia) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Venue
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
Cannabidiol edits
If you are going to edit medical content on Wikipedia, please follow WP:MEDRS for sourcing and be careful about adding misleading preliminary research into the encyclopedia. Your edits beginning here added weak journals from weak research, and were reverted. You can discuss here further, if you wish. Acta Neurol Taiwan has an impact factor of 0.3, so is unusable; Frontiers in Psych and Antioxidants are predatory journals discouraged from use on Wikipedia by WP:CITEWATCH. I'm attaching a video you can review to better understand MEDRS. --Zefr (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- I don't find anything on Citewatch about those journals. What is the evidence they are predatory?
- I thought this was reliable: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/lstrc/jsel.html
deisenbe (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Both Antioxidants and Front Psych are easy to find, and are certainly predatory, dubious sources for medical content - the former under MDPI journals, and the latter under Frontiers Media. I don't know what point you're trying to make by showing the Medline link (which is irrelevant to my reasons for reverting your edit). It appears from your contribution history you may not be experienced with the medical literature, so you should use caution or avoid editing encyclopedia medical topics, WP:CIR. --Zefr (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- I have no idea how to find them or what mdpi stands for. deisenbe (talk) 17:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
- Both Antioxidants and Front Psych are easy to find, and are certainly predatory, dubious sources for medical content - the former under MDPI journals, and the latter under Frontiers Media. I don't know what point you're trying to make by showing the Medline link (which is irrelevant to my reasons for reverting your edit). It appears from your contribution history you may not be experienced with the medical literature, so you should use caution or avoid editing encyclopedia medical topics, WP:CIR. --Zefr (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Your thread has been archived
|
|
Hi Deisenbe! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|