Jump to content

User talk:Coolhawks88

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Coolhawks88! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 21:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Welcome to WikiProject EastEnders!

[edit]

Here are some things you can do to help:



-Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 23:30, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LT

[edit]
Welcome!

Hi, and welcome to the London Transport WikiProject! We're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of London's transport system.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project also provides templates to help you make the perfect article.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask another fellow member, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around!

— From the members of WikiProject London Transport

14:49, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Hi Coolhawks88

[edit]

Welcome Coolhawks88

Thank you for joining the Law Enforcement Wikiproject on the English Wikipedia! As you would have guessed we are a group dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to law enforcement

Since you now are a member you get to have our userbox or banner on your userpage! To add these use:

  1. {{User WikiprojectPolice}} -- our userbox, or
  2. {{Lawenforcementmember}} -- our member banner.

Here are some more tips to get you started:

  • Creating articles: See here for articles you can create, but dont forget to add [[Category:Law enforcement]] to the base of the article and our project banner to the talk page of the article using {{Law enforcement}}
  • Participate on our talk page: It is highly recommended that you watchlist it. There are also a number of small projects on the talk page as well that may be of interest to you!
  • Check the bullentin board: For news and information, please read the bulletin board regularly or add it to you userpage using: {{Lawenforcementbulletinboard}}
  • Improve an article: Click here to find all the really short articles, pick one from that list and improve it. When you are done go to the talk page of that article and removed {{Law enforcement| class=Stub}} the bit in bold and another editor will be along to see how well you have done and reassess the article to a much higher class.

All members are reminded:

In a nutshell:

  1. SGGH speak! (Project Co-ordinator)
  2. Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) (Assistant Co-ordinator)
  3. Or any project co-ordinator listed on the main project page or members page.

Again, Thank you and Welcome


Hope we make you feel welcomed!

Dep. Garcia ( Talk + | Help Desk | Complaints ) 22:04, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please re-register

[edit]

Hello, Coolhawks88! You are receiving this notice because the WikiProject BBC is attempting to determine which members are still active. As a result of this all people on the active members list are being asked to re-register.

To re-register please see Wikipedia:WikiProject BBC/Re-Registration.

If you do not re-register within 15 days of receiving this notice your name will be removed from the active members list and put onto the inactive members list (if for any reason you were unable to reply to this notice in time, you can just move your name back).

Boy1jhn 14:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lugia

[edit]

You forgot to put the actor who voice's lugia his name is Eric Rath —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.112.23.57 (talk) 22:54, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Geri Halliwell And David Walliams.jpg

[edit]

Hi did you take this pic?19:45, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit]

Please stop removing valid redlinks. Redlinks on potentially valid topics are supposed to be in articles, to encourage people to create articles on these subjects, and you are deleting large numbers of clearly valid redlinks. — iridescent 20:28, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Tumolo

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Bob Tumolo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page consists only of one sentence and may be about you or a friend.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as Bob Tumolo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 21:41, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

November 2007

[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Tiddly-Tom 19:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Wessex Children

[edit]

Dear Sir, you are cordially invited to join a discussion on this matter at WikiProject British Royalty. Yours in anticipation, DBD 16:53, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

[edit]

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over a Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:25, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "Prince/ss X of Wales" Issue

[edit]

Just thought I'd let you know that there's a discussion about the above at the WikiProject, and I'm inviting all of the members to join in DBD 13:40, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Could you explain to me why my image Image:Battersea Powerstation - Across Thames - London - 020504.jpg appears on your Flickr account with no attribution and a changed licence? Much the same could be asked about your lifting Image:Hyde Park Albert Memorial Jan 2006.jpg as this. Bottom line: just exactly what the hell do you think you're playing at? --Tagishsimon (talk) 12:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetups - Sunday May 11th

[edit]

We're hoping to have regular meetups in London. The next one is on May 11th Wikipedia:Meetup/London 9. Another Sunday lunch in Holborn. Come along! -- Harry Wood (talk) 11:35, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Law Enforcement Barnstar Proposal Poll

[edit]

Hello there Coolhawks88,

We here at Wikiproject Law Enforcement are currently in the process of deciding wither or not to make this WikiProject Law Enforcement's official Barnstar award. Being that you are a member of Wikiproject Law Enforcement, we are humbly asking you to voice your opinion here about our new Barnstar.


Thank You and All the Best, Mifter (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


--Mifter (talk) 20:48, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Northern Ireland

[edit]

Hi,

I'd like to take the opportunity to advise you on two matters which, being a member or former member of the Northern Ireland WikiProject or it's sister project on Belfast, you might be interested in the following submission about a recent terrorist attack Wikipedia:Northern Irish Wikipedians' notice board#News.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to ask for your help in reviving the Northern Ireland WikiProject. Given that there are only a small number of Wikipedians from Northern Ireland or interested specifically in the region, the project needs all the help it can get.

Cheers, --Setanta747 (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cheshire newsletter

[edit]
Delivered on 19 January 2009 by Nev1. If you do not wish to receive future newsletters, please add two *s by your username on the Project Mainpage.


Questionnaire

[edit]

In an effort to assess the progress of Wikiproject Cheshire, it has been decided to send a questionnaire to members. To answer, please copy this questionnaire and paste your answers on the answer page. While participation is, of course, not compulsory, thoughtful answers will help the project to develop and improve. Thank you.

1. The project is always looking for new members, so we want to find out which ways of attracting and approaching potential members work best. Do you remember how and why you joined?
Answer:
2. How would you describe your involvement in the project? What activities do you undertake and how often do you edit Cheshire-related article?
Answer:
3. Do you feel like you receive adequate support/contact from project members?
Answer:
4. The project talk page is intended to be the hub of the project, where members discuss articles and help each other improving them. Until very recently it has been almost inactive, but do you check the project talk page?
Answer:
4a. If the talk page was more active, would you get involved in discussions there?
Answer:
5. When viewing Cheshire-related articles, are there any issues that have stood out as needing attention or frustrated you? (Traditional counties POV, poor coverage about a particular subject, vandalism going unnoticed etc)
Answer:
6. Maintaining the Cheshire portal is one of the Cheshire WikiProject's main aims, providing a display of the best and most up to date articles that are part of the project. There is currently a drive to promote it to featured status, but input from a wide range of members is needed. Do you have the portal on your watchlist?
Answer:
7. Would you be interesting in subscribing to a newsletter covering North West England, with details of work done by WikiProjects representing Cheshire, Greater Manchester, and Merseyside?
Answer:
8. Finally, are there any improvements or initiatives you'd like to see WP:CHES undertake, or general comments you'd like to make?
Answer:

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

[edit]
Wikimedia UK logo
Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12


Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

Time for resolution

[edit]

Hiya. For several months now, the article naming for 18th Century British royals has been ever-which-where — all over the shop. In an attempt to solve this, I have prepared a page for discussion: here. Please, please, please come and discuss, even contribute to the Poll. Cheers! DBD 15:29, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Croome Park

[edit]

. --Kudpung (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits...

[edit]

...to Railpower GG20B, Slug (railroad), and BNSF Railway, have been reverted. Please STOP removing redlinks, as you were warned about above. You should also avoid overlinking articles, as you did in all 3 of these cases. WuhWuzDat 19:22, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In some of your recent edits to articles you added links which did not add meaning, or repeated the same link in the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. -Fnlayson (talk) 21:59, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...to American Express were reverted due to overlinking. Please stop overlinking. Thanks. --EPadmirateur (talk) 20:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Coolhawks you appear to be still adding links to articles that have to be removed either because they are not needed or link to non relevant content. I appreciate you are trying to help but you need to understand that what you are doing is creating extra work for others and could be seen as disruptive. It would be a shame to see you blocked for disruptive behaviour so can you please STOP adding links until you understand the relevant guidelines and policies. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 23:01, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Harewood

[edit]

Hi, just a note on your edit to the Harewood article. According to the MOS the caption in this case should not end with a full stop as it is not a sentence. Thanks Keith D (talk) 20:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please...

[edit]

–Signalhead < T > 13:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

–Signalhead < T > 10:22, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


I refer you again to my comments above. –Signalhead < T > 17:47, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passer rating

[edit]

Coolhawks88—FYI, passer rating is not a percentage, but a number, similar to octane rating. Samer (talk) 04:09, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Improper categorisation

[edit]

Please note, adding pages to Category:Wikipedia semi-protected pages does not automatically protect pages and you do not have the authority to protect pages. If you think that a page warrants protection you need to request page protection so that an administrator can protect a page. You have inappropriately added a number of articles to Category:Wikipedia semi-protected pages today and I would suggest that you self-revert the inappropriate addition on pages where this has not already been done by other editors. --AussieLegend (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subcategories

[edit]

Regarding several of your recent edits (e.g., [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9]), please note that it is generally unnecessary for an article to be in a category and one or more of its subcategories (see Wikipedia:Subcategorization). In each of the cases linked, you added a high-level category when the article was already in one or more of its subcategories; for example:

Please review the Categorization guideline before making additional large-scale category changes. Thank you, -- Black Falcon (talk) 19:02, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

The best way to think about WP:Categories on Wikipedia is a structured hierarchy, like a large pyramid, with articles contained within small granular categories at the bottom and these categories contained in fewer, but increasingly larger categories as we get closer to the top. The model of subsidiarity applies, so articles are always contained within the lowest suitable categories. An alternative model would be the "keywords" model (as used on sites like flickr.com) where an article is placed in all categories that are associated with it, even if the connection is vague. Wikipedia does not use this model. MRSC (talk) 17:00, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Golf Wives and Girlfriends

[edit]

I have nominated Category:Golf Wives and Girlfriends (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 00:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Clegg

[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:British_atheists Clegg does not fit in the atheist cat, please see these conditions of adding the cat, which he does not fit into, This category contains Atheists,

  • who have expressed being an atheist, * and of whom it is known how they define their atheism.

thanks. Off2riorob (talk) 22:39, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Subcategories, again

[edit]

I have noticed that you are more frequently applying lower-level subcategories to articles, and I want to express my appreciation to you for that. I want to ask, however, that you take even greater care to not add redundant categories. For example, it was not necessary to place:

  1. Kiss (band) in Category:1972 establishments (diff) because the article already is in Category:Musical groups established in 1972;
  2. Quiznos in Category:1981 establishments (diff) because the article already is in Category:Companies established in 1981;
  3. Rita's Water Ice in Category:1984 establishments (diff) because the article already is in Category:Companies established in 1984;
  4. Council Rock High School South in Category:2002 establishments (diff) because the article already is in Category:Educational institutions established in 2002;
  5. Harrods in Category:1834 establishments (diff) because the article already is in Category:Companies established in 1834; and
  6. Samantha Cameron in Category:British people (diff) because the article already is in Category:English businesspeople.

I also ask that you be more cautious with adding categories in general, for example:

  1. The Chinstrap Penguin (diff) is a bird found in the Antarctic region (the region surrounding the South Pole), but not a bird of the Arctic (the region surrounding the North Pole).
  2. Nick Clegg should not have been placed in Category:British atheists (diff) without a source in the article to confirm this; see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Categories.

Thank you, -- Black Falcon (talk) 05:22, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Railway station categories

[edit]

Hi, regarding these edits: 1, 2 - we don't normally use [[Category:xxxx establishments]] on railway stations: these categories have special subcategories [[Category:Railway stations opened in xxxx]]. Since the two stations concerned were already in Category:Railway stations opened in 1906 and Category:Railway stations opened in 1852, there was no need for them to also be in Category:1906 establishments and Category:1852 establishments, so I have reverted both. --Redrose64 (talk) 17:17, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Licia Ronzulli

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Licia Ronzulli. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HotCat

[edit]

Please stop adding nonexistent categories to articles.--Terrillja talk 23:04, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Particularly categories that have been deleted through discussion. Dougweller (talk) 07:30, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop doing simliar things as you did here. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:47, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of responses to warnings and complaints

[edit]

I see a number of warnings/complaints on this page, and that you have never responded to any of them. This is a collaborative work and communication with other editors is vital and not optional. If you won't communicate and have this many complaints you are not showing yourself to be a benefit to Wikipedia. Unless you make it clear that you are going to communicate in the future, and in the latest instance agree to stop adding non-existent categories, I'll block you. Dougweller (talk) 07:36, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please stop adding unnecessary categories. Winner 42 Talk to me! 23:50, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Meredith Kercher

[edit]

How do. I have undone this edit as I don't think the category is appropriate for the article. pablo 10:33, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization

[edit]

Category:Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 03:25, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Coolhawks88 Books

[edit]

Category:Coolhawks88 Books, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HotCat

[edit]

Please stop abusing the HotCat tool by adding empty categories. Rndomuser (talk) 02:34, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Liverpool F.C. wiki

[edit]

Hello, I am the lead sysop on the Liverpool F.C. wiki. It is a wiki dedicated solely to Liverpool F.C.. We aim to make the ultimate database for the club we all love. Since adopting the incredibly inactive wiki about a month ago we have greatly increased the article count and modernized it from it's previous state. The problem is there are not many active members on the site and we need more for the site to properly grow. It is well organized and on it's way to be a great site we just need more editors to expand. It is based on Wikia's network of wikis. Like Wikipedia it is free to use and the editing process is exactly the same. If you know how to edit Wikipedia you will know how to edit the Liverpool F.C. wiki. Now for the question you may be asking yourself. Why edit there? Wikipedia has articles on Liverpool. This is true. At the Liverpool wiki it is all about Liverpool. We allow editors to edit anything about Liverpool no matter how trivial. We allow edits on reserve and academy players, and even things as trivial as the fitness coaches for the year 2011. We also do not lock pages to registered users. That means if you have something to say about Steven Gerrard you can click edit and not view source and actually write something. I would love for you to come by and check the wiki out. Feel free to edit any page. Every time you click edit your ARE helping this wiki grow. Thanks for taking the time to read this! http://liverpoolfc.wikia.com/wiki/Liverpool_FC_Wiki --Coffeeclub213 (talk) 02:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Celtic F.C. task force

[edit]

Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football.
If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 19:53, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost Interview

[edit]
Brought to you by Simply south...... eating shoes for 5 years So much for ER 18:36, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

[edit]
Hello, Coolhawks88. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.


Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Coolhawks88 Books

[edit]

Category:Coolhawks88 Books, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 16:06, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

[edit]
WikiWomen Unite!
Hi Coolhawks88! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 22:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge

[edit]

Hi, at Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge we're striving to bring about 10,000 article improvements and creations for the UK and Ireland and inspire others to create more content. In order to achieve this we need diversity of content, in all parts of the UK and Ireland on all topics. Eventually a regional contest will be held for all parts of the British Isles, like they were for Wales and the Wedt Country. We currently have just over 1900 articles and need contributors! If you think you'd be interested in collaborating on this and helping reach the target quicker, please sign up and begin listing your entries there as soon as possible! Thanks.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Coolhawks88. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Futuristic shooting games has been nominated for renaming

[edit]

Category:Futuristic shooting games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:36, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dmartin969. An edit that you recently made to Lionhead rabbit seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! –DMartin 04:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Science fiction shooter video games has been nominated for merging

[edit]

Category:Science fiction shooter video games has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 22:33, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NO ACTION

[edit]

The CfD nomination for Category:Science fiction shooter video games has successfully been passed about 2 weeks ago, but the category hasn't been merged yet. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Coolhawks88&oldid=1241810036"